Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Week 6 Discussion
Todays Objective
Student should be:
1. Able to Differentiate Sieve Analysis from Hydrometer Analysis.
2. Able to Analyze the data of Distribution curve.
3. Able to interpret the data from sieve analysis.
4. Able solve the three soil basic parameters.
•Gravels are pieces of rocks with occasional particles of quartz, feldspar, and other minerals.
•Sand particles are made of mostly quartz and feldspar. Other mineral grains may also be present
at times.
•Silts are the microscopic soil fractions that consist of very fine quartz grains and some
flake-shaped particles that are fragments of micaceous minerals.
•Clays are mostly flake-shaped microscopic and submicroscopic particles of mica, clay minerals, and
other minerals
Name of Organization Grain size (mm)
Gravel Sand Silt Clay
U.S. Department of >2 2 to 0.05 0.05 to 0.002 < 0.002
Agriculture (USDA)
American Association of 76.2 to 2 2 to 0.075 to <0.002
State Highway and 0.075mm 0.002
Transportation Officials
(AASHTO)
Unified Soil 76.2 to 4.75 to 0.075 Fines (i.e., silts and clays)
Classification System 4.75 for <0.075
Massachusetts Institute 60mm to 2.0mm to 0.06mm to 0.002
Technology Classification 2mm 0.06mm 0.002mm
(MIT)
Mechanical Analysis of Soil
Sieve Hydrometer
Analysis Analysis
Sieve Analysis
The sieve analysis determines the grain size distribution curve of soil samples
by passing them through a stack of sieves of decreasing mesh opening sizes and
by measuring the weight retained on each sieve. The sieve analysis is generally
applied to the soil fraction larger than 75 μmm(#200). Grains smaller than
75μmm are sorted by using sedimentation or Hydrometer Analysis.
Sieve Analysis Sieve # Opening (mm)
4 4.750
6 3.350
8 2.360
10 2.000
16 1.180
Sieve Analysis
20 0.850
30 0.600
40 0.425
50 0.300
60 0.250
80 0.180
100 0.150
140 0.106
Hydrometer
170 0.088
Analysis
200 0.075
270 0.053
Laboratory Procedure
Pan
4 0
10 60
20 80
40 95
60 130
80 140
100 180
200 56
Pan 12
Cumulative Mass-M1 +M2+… + Mi
Cumulative mass
Mass soil retained
U.S Sieve size Opening (mm) retained above
(g)
each sieve (g)
4 4.75 0 0
10 2.00 60 0+60= 60
20 0.850 80 60+80=140
40 0.425 95 140+95=235
60 0.250 130 235+130=365
80 0.180 140 365+140=505
100 0.150 180 505+180=685
200 0.075 56 685+56=741
Pan - 12 741+12=753 =ƩM
For Percentage% of finer:
●
Cumulative
Opening Mass soil mass retained Percent Finer
U.S Sieve size
(mm) retained (g) above each %
sieve (g)
4 4.75 0 0 100
10 2.00 60 0+60= 60 92.03
20 0.850 80 60+80=140 81.41
40 0.425 95 140+95=235 68.79
60 0.250 130 235+130=365 51.52
80 0.180 140 365+140=505 32.93
100 0.150 180 505+180=685 9.03
200 0.075 56 685+56=741 1.89
741+12=753
Pan - 12 0
=ƩM
Three basic soil parameters
Effective size
Coefficient
Uniformity
of
coefficient
gradation
Curve I Curve-II Curve III
Represent Poorly represents well represents Gap
Graded Soil Graded Soil Graded Soil
Gravels are considered to be well graded when Cu > 4 and 1 < Cc < 3. Sands are
considered to be well graded when Cu > 6 and 1 < Cc < 3.
For Percentage% of finer:
●
Cumulative
Opening Mass soil mass retained Percent Finer
U.S Sieve size
(mm) retained (g) above each %
sieve (g)
4 4.75 0 0 100
10 2.00 60 0+60= 60 92.03
20 0.850 80 60+80=140 81.41
40 0.425 95 140+95=235 68.79
60 0.250 130 235+130=365 51.52
80 0.180 140 365+140=505 32.93
100 0.150 180 505+180=685 9.03
200 0.075 56 685+56=741 1.89
741+12=753
Pan - 12 0
=ƩM
Problem 2
For the particle-size distribution curve shown on previous problem 1, determine the following:
Percent Passing
Sieve No. Diameter(mm) Sample # 1 Sample # 2
4 4.76 100 90
8 2.38 99 64
10 2.0 98 58
20 0.85 92 35
40 0.425 70 22
60 0.250 46 15
100 0.15 25 10
200 0.074 0 4
Plot grain size distribution curve to determine Cc and Cu
Gravels are considered to be well graded when Cu > 4 and 1 < Cc < 3. Sands are
considered to be well graded when Cu > 6 and 1 < Cc < 3.
Soil Sample # 2
#200 #4 3”
100
90
#200 #4 3”
100 C
90