Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ENGLISH
QUARTER 3-MODULE 4
Literary Criticism
1
DAY 1
Directions: Read each item carefully and choose the letter of your answer. Write
the letter on a separate sheet of paper.
2. This is the study of the text that focuses on the form and structure
A. formalism B. feminism C. historical D. reader - response
5. This pertains to a word or phrase that possesses a separate meaning from its
literal definition.
A. sound devices B. alliteration C. rhyme scheme D. figure of speech
8. This refers to the occurrence of the same sounds in words at the end of
matching lines of poetry.
A. repetition B. rhythm C. rhyme scheme D. rhyme
9. This is a figure of speech that attributes human traits or traits of other living
things to inanimate objects.
A. irony B. hyperbole C. personification D. metaphor
2
11. This is an approach in literary criticism that focuses on the reader and
his/her experience of a literary work.
A. formalism B. feminism C. historical D. reader - response
12. This is a literary device utilized by writers to create mental pictures with the
use of descriptive language.
A. rhyme scheme C. sensory imagery
B. sound devices D. figures of speech
14. He was the writer of the very popular poem entitled Trees.
A. Langston Hughes C. Guy De Maupassant
B. Joyce Kilmer D. Elizabeth Barrett Browning
15. All of these are guide questions in studying a text using the reader –
response approach, EXCEPT:
A. What is the plot of the text?
B. What is your overall reaction to the text?
C. How well did you enjoy the text as a work of art?
D. What does the text have to do with you personally?
Lesson Formalism/Structuralism
1
General Instruction: In all of the activities, write your answers on separate sheets
of paper.
3
What’s New
Are you familiar with this nursery rhyme? Sing it then answer the questions that
follow.
Questions;
1. What words are repeated in the song? a.___________ b. _____________
2. What words rhyme? a. ____________ b. _______________
3. What figure of speech is used in the last line? ____________
What Is It
What you have just done in the previous activity is the initial step in conducting a
literary criticism.
In poetry, the structures or elements are listed below, although some forms of
poetry do not necessarily include all of them.
A. Stanza – a group of lines in a poem
Stanzas of 2 lines are called a couplet
3 lines are called a tercet
4 lines are called a quatrain
5 lines are called a cinquain
6 lines are called a sestet
7 lines are called a septet
8 lines are called an octave
4
You mark rhyme in a poem with the letters of the alphabet. For instance, in
this stanza:
Whose woods these are think I know, (a)
His house is in the village though; (a)
He will not see me stopping here (b)
To watch his woods fill up with snow. (a)
The rhyme scheme is aaba (because “know,” “though,” and “snow” rhyme,
they are marked “a,” while “here” is another rhyme, and is marked “b”).
Trees
by Joyce Kilmer
5
7 A tree that may in Summer wear
8 A nest of robins in her hair;
What I Can Do
Directions: Read the poem closely. In one to two paragraphs, analyze and interpret
the poem using the formalistic method.
Dreams
by Langston Hughes
6
7 Life is a barren field
8 Frozen with snow.
DAY 2
Reader – Response
What’s In
Instructions: Rearrange the jumbled letters to form a word. The first letter is done
for you.
M I L F S R M O A
Answer: F_________________
7
What is the definition of the word that you have just formed?
_________________________________________________________________________________.
What’s New
Directions: Listen to this song and take note of the lyrics. Then do the tasks that
follow.
There You'll Be
by Faith Hill
Questions:
1. What did you feel after hearing the song?
2. What made you feel that way?
8
Write your ideas about an exciting and memorable experience which you can relate
to the song. Use the thought balloons below.
My Past My Present
My Future
What Is It
Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate and interpret the text on the basis of
their personal experience, previous knowledge and opinion.
The following are some guide questions that you can use in analyzing and
interpreting the text employing the reader-response method:
What does the text have to do with you, personally, and with your life
(past, present or future)? It is not acceptable to write that the text has
NOTHING to do with you, since just about everything humans can write has
to do in some way with every other human.
How much does the text agree or clash with your view of the world, and
what you consider right and wrong? Use several quotes as examples of
how they agree with and support what you think about the world, about
right and wrong, and about what you think it is to be human.
How did you learn, and to what extent were your views and opinions
challenged or changed by this text, if at all? Did the text communicate
with you? Why or why not? Give examples of how your views might have
changed or been strengthened (or perhaps, of why the text failed to convince
you, the way it is). Please do not write "I agree with everything the author
wrote," since everybody disagrees about something, even if it is a tiny point.
Use quotes to illustrate your points of challenge or where you were
persuaded.
How well does it address things that you, personally, care about and
consider important to the world? How does it address things that are
important to your family, your community, your ethnic group, to people of
your economic or social class or background, or your faith tradition? If not,
9
who does or did the text serve? Did it pass the "Who cares?" test? Use
quotes to illustrate.
Critique the text. Reading and writing "critically" does not mean the same
thing as "criticizing," in everyday language (complaining or griping, fault-
finding, nit-picking). Your "critique" can and should be positive and
praise the text if possible, as well as pointing out problems, disagreements
and shortcomings.
How well did you enjoy the text (or not) as entertainment or as a work
of art? Use quotes or examples to illustrate the quality of the text as art or
entertainment. Of course, be aware that some texts are not meant to be
entertainment or art--a news report or textbook, for instance, may be neither
entertaining or artistic, but may still be important and successful.
To sum up, what is your overall reaction to the text? Would you read
something else like this, or by this author, in the future or not? Why or why
not? To whom would you recommend this text?
Below is an example of a literary criticism of a the very popular story utilizing the
reader-response approach.
Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare is said to be one of the greatest works of
classic literature and the epitome of romance writing. Though now personally I find
the work a bit over-dramatic and an unrealistic view of love and life in the time
period but can understand how depending on the age group reading this work and
the personal experiences of the reader can drastically affect how the work is viewed.
I first read Romeo and Juliet during my freshman year of high school when I was 14
years old, the same age as Juliet. That was my first encounter with the work, and
at the time I believed that it was exactly how love is and how love worked. It was
my inexperience and naivety like Juliet’s that lead me to feeling that way. It took
the harsh realities of living that showed me that love and life is not and cannot be
like that. One relationship should not be worth dying for at such a young age.
I personally do enjoy the story, I love the language and the diction and found the
humor marvelous, but I also found it soppy and overly dramatic. But the story also
brought up several other personal correlations into my real modern life. Dancing
with people that you do not know, being concerned for the family name, and that
there are some people you are simply not to associate with. I understand the fear of
being associated with someone the family considers to be a threat or just unworthy.
There are other concerns I had with looking at Romeo and Juliet the fact that this
story happens in such a short amount of time, the story is said to take place in
only one week. In one week, this couple meets, marries, and dies for each other. I
have a hard time accepting the idea that a couple in one week’s time was infatuated
enough to die for within one week.
Love at first sight was a concept I was willing to accept until recently. Talking with
others about the topic, I find that some are willing to admit that they believe in it
and others scoff at the very idea. Perhaps the issue is societal. That when we are
10
young, we are willing to entertain the notion of extremes in love and our society
allows it. As if our society knows that all it will take is that first serious break up to
snap us back to our senses and back to the reality that this is not how life works.
We then snap out of it and our hearts harden. We then cannot accept the idea of
love at first sight and a love so strong and so fiery that we are willing to die for it or
cannot live without it.
In closing, Romeo and Juliet is a fantastic work of literature written by the world’s
most famed playwright. This is considered a classic love story but has been met
with increasing cynicism and skepticism about its relevance in today’s society.
Enjoying this piece through reader-response criticism allows each reader to draw
their own personal conclusions and be affected by their own personal biases which
create a unique reading experience from person to person.
What I Can Do
Directions: Read the selection below. In one to two paragraphs, write an analysis
of the short story using the reader - response method.
The Necklace
by Guy De Maupassant
The story takes place in France a long time ago. Mathilde Loisel lives in a flat with
her husband, who works as a clerk for the Minister of Education. Their lives are
not luxurious, but they are not poor, merely simple. Mathilde, however, longs to be
rich. She envies her friend Jeanne who has a large house and lots of jewelry.
One day her husband brings home an invitation to a ball. He thinks his wife will be
excited to attend such a fancy party, but instead she is upset. She complains that
she has nothing suitable to wear to such an extravagant occasion. Her kind
husband agrees to give her the four hundred francs that he had been saving to buy
a new rifle to get herself a gown.
The week of the party, Mathilde seems anxious again. When her husband asks her
why, she frets that she has no jewelry to wear with her dress. He suggests that
perhaps she could borrow something from her friend Jeanne Forestier. Mathilde
goes to Jeanne's house and picks out a sparkling diamond necklace to borrow.
She and her husband attend the gala and have a fabulous time. She loves amazing
and dances all night. Finally, they head home in the wee hours of the morning.
When they arrive home, Mathilde realizes that the necklace is missing. They
wonder if it fell off in the carriage that they took home, but neither of them noticed
the number. Her husband goes out to search the streets but returns empty
handed. To stall for time, Mathilde writes to her friend that she broke the clasp and
is having it repaired. In the meantime, they find another necklace that matches the
missing one, but it costs thirty-six thousand francs. Her husband fortunately
inherited eighteen thousand francs from his father, but they will need to borrow the
11
rest of the money. Finally, they have enough to purchase the replacement necklace
and Mathilde gives it to Jeanne who doesn't even look at it.
The next ten years Mathilde's life changes dramatically. They move to a smaller
apartment where she has to cook and clean for herself. She also does work on the
side while her husband works multiple jobs to pay back all the money they
borrowed. After the ten years, the money is all paid back, but Mathilde has aged a
great deal.
One day she sees Jeanne Forestier on the street. She decides to tell her the truth
about the necklace. Jeanne is stunned by Mathilde's rough and very poor
appearance. Mathilde explains that it is indirectly because of Jeanne since she lost
the necklace she borrowed from her and had to pay for a replacement. Shocked,
Jeanne confesses that the necklace Mathilde borrowed was a fake, made of paste,
worth no more than five hundred francs.
DAY 3
Sensory Imagery
What’s In
12
How do you see a mango?
Amazon.in
Write one sentence which is the most likely thought or perspective for each of the
individuals listed below. The first one is done for you.
Most of the time, we look at things from different perspectives. Just like in looking
at the same mango fruit, there are varied points of view.
In analyzing any literary work, there are also different approaches. Day 1 of this
module talks about formalism, and Day 2 on reader-response method. Below is an
analogy on the difference between these two approaches.
In looking at the mango fruit, a formalist would think: What shape and diameter is
the mango fruit?
while a reader-response theorist would ask: What does the mango taste like?
What does the mango remind us of?
In literary criticism, how you study and analyze a particular literary work depends
on the kind of method or approach that you use. There are still many other
methods you need to explore as you advance in your studies.
What’s New
What Is It
In the previous activity, you identified objects in the picture that appeal to your
senses. You can also imagine these things by using words alone, without any aid of
a picture. Pictures created in your mind with the use of words are called sensory
images.
What I Can Do
Direction: Classify each of the following sensory images to its proper column.
Sensory Images
14
3. cinnamon – scented candle 11. the golden sunset in Manila Bay
4. chirping of birds 12. warm summer air
5. gust of cold wind 13. the flashing blue lights
6. muffled cry of a woman 14. cracking of wood splitting
7. fragrance of spring flowers 15. sour lemonade
8. sweet and juicy orange
DAY 4
What’s More
15
16 Out in the fields with God.
Task B. In one to two paragraphs, compose a literary criticism of the poem Out in
the Fields with God. Indicate the method and the title of the literary work. You may
use the formalistic or reader-response approach. Be guided by the criteria below.
DAY 5
Assessment (Post-Test)
16
Directions: Read each item carefully and choose the letter of your answer. Write
your answers on a separate sheet of paper.
2. This is the study of the text that focuses on the form and structure
A. formalism B. feminism C. historical D. reader – response
5. This pertains to a word or phrase that possesses a separate meaning from its
literal definition.
B. sound devices B. alliteration C. rhyme scheme D. figure of speech
7. This refers to the occurrence of the same sounds in words at the end of
matching lines of poetry.
B. repetition B. rhythm C. rhyme scheme D. rhyme
8. This is a figure of speech that attributes human traits or traits of other living
things to inanimate objects.
B. irony B. hyperbole C. personification D. metaphor
10. This is a literary device utilized by writers to create mental pictures with the
use of descriptive language.
C. rhyme scheme C. sensory imagery
D. sound devices D. figures of speech
Classify each of the given sentences the predominant sense that it appeals to.
Write
only the letter.
A. sight B. sound C. smell D. touch E. taste
17
13. The familiar tang of his grandmother’s cranberry sauce reminded him of his
youth. - ___
14. The concert was so loud that her ears rang for days afterward. - ___
15. The tree bark was rough against her skin. - ___
References
Books
https://amandaactually.wordpress.com/2018/07/30/reader-response-
criticism-romeo-and-juliet/
https://courses.lumenlearning.com/introliterature/chapter/reader-
response-criticism/
https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/subject_specific_writing/writing_in_literature/l
iterary_theory_
http://utminers.utep.edu/omwilliamson/engl0310/readerresponse.htm
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320911543_A_Formalist_Analysi
s_of_Joyce_Kilmer's_Trees_with_Reference_to_Translation_into_Arabic
Acknowledgement
English – Grade 10
Quarter 3- Module 4: Literary Criticism
18