Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. Survey research – involves asking people to report on their own attitudes and behavior.
Advantage – provide insight into how individuals see themselves and allows the researcher to
obtain information about people’s thoughts and feelings that cannot be directly observed.
Disadvantage – self- report may not be accurate because people are deceiving
themselves or trying to deceive the researcher.
2. Interviews – interviews are one-on-one conversations directed by a researcher that can take place in
person, over the phone, or via e-mail.
- interviews are also subject to interviewer bias – interviewer Bias: the interviewer may
provide verbal or nonverbal cues that impact how the participant responds.
Advantage:
- The one-on-one nature of an interview may inspire the participant to take the research more
seriously.
- The interviewer can take note of not only the participant’s response but also the manner in
which the participant delivers the response.
- Face-to-face interviews are especially rich sources for observing nonverbal cues such as facial
expressions, hand gestures, pauses, and posture.
- Finally, interviews can allow for question clarification or follow-up questions, although this
depends on how structured the interviews.
STRUCTURED INTERVIEWS- Are characterized by a predetermined list of questions that interviewers ask
all candidate. All questions, follow-up questions, and responses by the interviewer are determined
beforehand to ensure that all the participants have a very similar experience.
SEMI_STRUCTURED interviews – there is a set of core questions or topics that the interviewer will follow,
but the interviewer may prompt for more information, ask follow-up questions, or clarify questions as
the interviewer deems necessary.
UNSTRUCTURED INTERVIEW – are more like free-flowing conversation, taking different directions based
on the candidate.
- additionally, research suggest that online questionnaires yield results similar to those
completed in person, although the utility of online questionnaires may vary based on the topic studied.
“It much more rely on watch what I do, not what I say.”
- One of the biggest and recurring issue in observational research is that it is prone to”
1. Observer bias – the observers pay closer attention to behavior that support their
expectations or interpret behaviors in ways that support their expectations or lose their focus
on the target behavior. Desired demographics can really be difficult to achieved.
* Blind- observer are not informed of the hypotheses in order to reduce observer bias. Meaning they
do not know what the hypotheses are they are not aware.
It is also wise to have more than one observer; this allows you to compare observation and test their
inter-rater reliability. They do not know other scores or core. In here we expect a very high correlation
or agreement in order to establish the reliability observation measure.
CODE SHEET – it is a piece of paper upon which the observer records his observation.
1. Narrative – a narrative account of what the participant did (detailed account of behaviors’ or
responses)
2. Checklist – a list of qualities or behaviors that are checked if present. Ex. Gender, age, specific
behavior occurred.
3. Duration – How long a behavior last. The time the participants showed the behavior of interest
4. Task Completion time – how long it takes to complete a task. The observer might also be record the
timing of behavior.
5. reaction time – how long it takes a participant to respond to a stimulus or the time a behavior was
triggered.
6. Latency – the time between stopping one task and beginning a new task.
7. rating scale – a numerical rating of a particular quality. To assess the intensity of a behavior. The
observers my code behavior that are live or recorded that allows for a higher accuracy because the
observer can examine the recording many times. If there are discrepancy between observer’s code, it
can be easily investigated by examining the recording. The decision to do a live observation or to
record the situation also depend on other decisions that researchers mixed. One of which is:
Covert- observations are made without the participants’ awareness. The participants
of the study are not aware. This are designed to capture the participants’ natural
spontaneous reaction to situation. But one of its down side it prompts a wide variety
of ethical complications as the participants of the study are not aware that they ae
being observe. Their behavior is recorded and analyzed hence an able to give consents
specially if it is being recorded.
Overt – no attempts are made to hide the observation. There is awareness of the
participants. Concerned about this is that those participants who knows that they are
being observe may change their behavior. This is due to social desirability bias. So this
will greatly affect the reliability of the observation.
ARCHIVAL METHOD - it involves describing data that existed before the time of the study. In other
words, the data were not generated as part of the study. One type of research method which will use
the existing or any existing primary data and that primary data will be use in order for us to arrive in a
conclusion or result of our existing research.
ARCHIVE RECORDS- are the public or private documents that describe the activities of the individual,
institutions, government and other groups. These are the records that are available to the public.
Advantages:
Versatility – it is designed to study almost in any social issues, it is applicable in almost all
(even on a simple issues).
Efficiency – you can quickly assess the result of the study
Generalizability – the result can be generalized from the representative sample to a larger
population without having to ask every single person from the sample.
Disadvantage:
Validity of answer – there are times that the research instrument used is poorly design that
would result in an inaccurate answer.
Representativeness – how the representative is chosen from the larger representative
population.
Rigidity - the instrument not standardized.
Advantages:
Information more reliable and free from bias
Easier to note effects environmental influences on specific outcomes
Easier to observe certain groups.
Disadvantages:
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
♠ Descriptive Validity – is a research term that refers to the accuracy and objectivity of the
information gathered. In order for us to have a valid descriptive research the measure use
must be valid and for us to have a valid measure it also must be reliable. Because the
reliability of a certain studies surely consistency and stability of a measure or score.
♠ Validity – is the extent to which a measure actually measures what it is intended to measure.
The truthfulness of a measure
A test can be reliable and not be valid.
- This is how researcher took about the extent that result represent reality. It is important
because it determine what survey to use and help ensure the researcher are using questions.
Measurement Validity – is the extent to which the measure in a study actually measure what
they intend to measure. It is about measuring what the researcher wants them to measure
Internal Validity – is the extent to which you can demonstrate a casual link between
your variables. It is degree to which a researcher can draw accurate conclusion. If the
effect of the dependent variable is only due to the independent variable, then internal
validity is achive.
External Validity – is the extent to which results of one study generalize to other
samples, settings and methods. The external validity of the study depends on whole
population of interest is and how the sample was obtain.
The importance of the external and internal validity varies base on the study design. In descriptive
research examine the Who, What, Where, When and How but that not examine the Why. In other
words, descriptive research does not seek to explain what cause a situation, feeling or behavior, purely
descriptive studies do not examine the relationship among variables. Because of this internal validity
is not a concern in a descriptive research, instead external validity is of primary concern in descriptive
research.
Probability Sampling – it is a random sampling; it is a sampling method that uses random selection in
which all members of a particular population are subpopulation have an equal chance of being
selected.
1. Simple random sampling – is a type of probability sampling in which every member of the
population has an equal chance of being selected as sample.
Steps:
Define the population
Identify all the members of the population
Randomly select a sample from the population
Collect data from that sample.
Steps:
Define the population
Identify the groups that you want to be proportionately represented in the
sample
Identify all the members of the population and to which strata each member
they belong
Divide the population based on which group you identified
Determine the proportion of population represent each group, randomly
select a sample form each group of population
Collect data from the sample.
3. Cluster sampling – is a type of probability sampling in which groups or clusters were randomly
selected instead of individuals.
Steps:
Define the population
Identify cluster within the population
Randomly select a sample of cluster
Collect the data.
Advantages of cluster sampling:
1. Time and cost efficient
2. High external validity
3. Practicality and ease.
1. CONVENIENCE SAMPLING – is a sampling strategy in which the researcher will choose their sample
based solely on the convenience.
2. Quota Sampling – is a sampling that result in the sample representing the key subpopulations based
on the characteristics such as age, gender, and ethnicity.
Steps:
Define the population
Identify the groups that you want to be proportionately represent in your
sample.
Determine the proportion of approximate proportion of the population
represented by each group
Decide where and when you will b able to find a sample of the groups you
identified.
Collect data form each group in proportions equal to those of the population.
3. Maximum variation sampling – is a sampling strategy in which the researcher seeks out the full
range of extremes in the population.
Steps:
Define the population
Identify the extremes in the populations
Seek out members of the population that represent various extremes as well
as those who represent the average.
Collect data.
4. Snowball Sampling – is a sampling strategy in which participants recruit other to be part of the
sample.
Steps:
Define the population
Identify the extremes in the populations
Seek out members of the population that represent various extremes as well
as those who represent the average.
Collect data.
- It goes hand in hand with correlational research in which one topic can collect other variables
that also need to be analyzed.