1) The document outlines key performance indicators (KPIs) and consequence management for roles like RDM, RTO, SBC SPoC, and FME.
2) It specifies targets for daily work order closure rates and updates.
3) Consequences for missing targets include warnings, queries, replacements, and potential releases depending on the number of violations and whether issues are within the roles' control.
1) The document outlines key performance indicators (KPIs) and consequence management for roles like RDM, RTO, SBC SPoC, and FME.
2) It specifies targets for daily work order closure rates and updates.
3) Consequences for missing targets include warnings, queries, replacements, and potential releases depending on the number of violations and whether issues are within the roles' control.
1) The document outlines key performance indicators (KPIs) and consequence management for roles like RDM, RTO, SBC SPoC, and FME.
2) It specifies targets for daily work order closure rates and updates.
3) Consequences for missing targets include warnings, queries, replacements, and potential releases depending on the number of violations and whether issues are within the roles' control.
**Note: These three KPIs are sacrosanct, above consequence management ap
** 5:00 pm Data shall be used to make this decision. CONSEQUENCE MANAGEMENT Target ACTION TO TAKEN
1st & 2nd time violation within the week,
oral warning; ≥ 3 times violation within the week, HR documented query & warning based on the response; For OS: Target: 85% Closure Rate @ 5:00pm. documented query from Employer & Violation: {< 85% closure rate} warning based on the response
1st & 2nd time violation within the week,
oral warning; ≥ 3 times violation within the week, HR documented query & warning based on the response; For OS: Target: 85% Closure Rate @ 5:00pm. documented query from Employer & Violation: {< 85% closure rate} warning based on the response
1st & 2nd time violation within the week,
oral warning; ≥ 3 times violation within the week, Request CEG to issue SBC query, Target: 85% Closure Rate @ 5:00pm. based on the response SPoC will be Violation: {< 85% closure rate} replaced
1st & 2nd time violation within the week,
oral warning; ≥ 3 times violation within the week, FSC request SBC to issue query to Target: 85% Closure Rate @ 5:00pm. FME, based on the response FME may be Violation: {< 85% closure rate} replaced
1st & 2nd time violation within the week,
oral warning; ≥ 3 times violation within the week, HR documented query & warning Target: 100% Closure of all WO with based on the response; For OS: Recovery Time (RT). Violation: {< 95% documented query from Employer & closure of all WO with RT} warning based on the response
1st & 2nd time violation within the week,
oral warning; ≥ 3 times violation within the week, HR documented query & warning Target: 100% Closure of all WO with based on the response; For OS: Recovery Time (RT). Violation: {< 95% documented query from Employer & closure of all WO with RT} warning based on the response
1st & 2nd time violation within the week,
oral warning; ≥ 3 times violation within the Target: 100% Closure of all WO with week, Request CEG to issue SBC query, Recovery Time (RT). Violation: {< 95% based on the response SPoC will be closure of all WO with RT} replaced
1st & 2nd time violation within the week,
oral warning; ≥ 3 times violation within the Target: 100% Closure of all WO with week, FSC request SBC to issue query to Recovery Time (RT). Violation: {< 95% FME, based on the response FME may be closure of all WO with RT} replaced 1st & 2nd time violation within the week, oral warning; ≥ 3 times violation within the week, HR documented query & warning Target: 100% Update on all running WO based on the response; For OS: without RT that has exceeded SLA. documented query from Employer & Violation: {If achieved is < 95%} warning based on the response
1st & 2nd time violation within the week,
oral warning; ≥ 3 times violation within the week, HR documented query & warning Target: 100% Update on all running WO based on the response; For OS: without RT that has exceeded SLA. documented query from Employer & Violation: {If achieved is < 95%} warning based on the response
1st & 2nd time violation within the week,
oral warning; ≥ 3 times violation within the Target: 100% Update on all running WO week, Request CEG to issue SBC query, without RT that has exceeded SLA. based on the response SPoC will be Violation: {If achieved is < 95%} replaced
1st & 2nd time violation within the week,
Target: Provide feedback on 100% of all oral warning; ≥ 3 times violation within the running WO without RT that has week, FSC request SBC to issue query to exceeded SLA. Violation: {If achieved is FME, based on the response FME may be < 95%} replaced
osanct, above consequence management applies on violation of any of the them
e used to make this decision. OUTCOME
1) Warning letter if issue concerned is within RDM control; 2)
Arrange to handle the issue responsible if confirmed; 3) Release after 2nd warning letter.
1) Warning letter if issue concerned is within RTO control; 2)
Arrange to handle the issue responsible if confirmed; 3) Release after 2nd warning letter.
1) SBC replace SPoC if issue concerned is within SPoC control;
2) Arrange to handle the issue responsible if confirmed.
1) FSC request release of FME if issue concerned is within FME
control; 2) Arrange to handle the issue responsible if confirmed.
1) Warning letter if issue concerned is within RDM control; 2)
Arrange to handle the issue responsible if confirmed; 3) Release after 2nd warning letter.
1) Warning letter if issue concerned is within RTO control; 2)
Arrange to handle the issue responsible if confirmed; 3) Release after 2nd warning letter.
1) SBC replace SPoC if issue concerned is within SPoC control;
2) Arrange to handle the issue responsible if confirmed.
1) FSC request release of FME if issue concerned is within FME
control; 2) Arrange to handle the issue responsible if confirmed. 1) Warning letter if issue concerned is within RDM control; 2) Arrange to handle the issue responsible if confirmed; 3) Release after 2nd warning letter.
1) Warning letter if issue concerned is within RTO control; 2)
Arrange to handle the issue responsible if confirmed; 3) Release after 2nd warning letter.
1) SBC replace SPoC if issue concerned is within SPoC control;
2) Arrange to handle the issue responsible if confirmed.
1) FSC request release of FME if issue concerned is within FME
control; 2) Arrange to handle the issue responsible if confirmed.