Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LABORATORY MANUAL
for
BE8332
TRANSPORTATION
ENGINEERING
SINGAPORE POLYTECHNIC
School of Architecture and the Built Environment
Diploma in Civil Engineering
Table of Contents
Table of Contents.............................................................................................. i
i
Official (Closed), Non‐Sensitive
SINGAPORE POLYTECHNIC
School of Architecture and the Built Environment
Diploma in Civil Engineering
Students must:
1. be alert and vigilant;
2. put on proper footwear;
3. wear a face mask;
4. put on high-visibility safety vests;
5. no mixing between groups;
6. keep a safe distancing of 1m between individuals should be observed; and
7. keep a safe distance from the traffic flow when carrying out any roadside
experiment.
ii
Official (Closed), Non‐Sensitive
In the event of inclement weather conditions (e.g. rain, lightning, hail, haze),
students must seek approval from the lecturer in charge before proceeding
with any outdoor experiment.
REPORT ASSESSMENT
iii
Official (Closed), Non‐Sensitive
SINGAPORE POLYTECHNIC
School of Architecture and the Built Environment
Diploma in Civil Engineering
EXPERIMENT NO. 1
Traffic Volume Count at Intersection
AIM
INTRODUCTION
APPARATUS
Manual counters
PROCEDURE
RESULTS / CALCULATIONS
REPORTING OF RESULTS
1
Cars & vans = 1 PCU. Light goods vehicles = 1.5 PCU. Heavy goods vehicles = 2.5 PCU
Very heavy goods vehicles = 3 PCU. Small buses = 1.6 PCU. Large buses = 2.5 PCU.
Motorcycles = 0.7 PCU.
1
Official (Closed), Non‐Sensitive
DISCUSSION
2
Official (Closed), Non‐Sensitive
DATA SHEET
DATE:
TIME:
TESTER:
WEATHER:
Time interval Cars/Vans LGV HGV VHGV Small bus Large bus Motorcycle
Left-Turning Vehicles
Time interval Cars/Vans LGV HGV VHGV Small bus Large bus Motorcycle
3
Official (Closed), Non‐Sensitive
Right-Turning Vehicles
Time interval Cars/Vans LGV HGV VHGV Small bus Large bus Motorcycle
4
Official (Closed), Non‐Sensitive
SINGAPORE POLYTECHNIC
School of Architecture and the Built Environment
Diploma in Civil Engineering
EXPERIMENT NO. 2
Speed Study
AIM
INTRODUCTION
APPARATUS
PROCEDURE
CALCULATIONS
REPORTING OF RESULTS
(a) Plot a histogram chart each category of vehicles (i.e. passenger cars
and commercial vehicles)
(b) Plot the cumulative percentage graphs for both categories of vehicles
on the same diagram
2
Passenger car category includes taxis
3
Commercial vehicle category includes vans, trucks, all types of buses, etc.
5
Official (Closed), Non‐Sensitive
(c) Determine the 15, 50 and 85 percentile speeds of the two categories of
vehicles
6
Official (Closed), Non‐Sensitive
DISCUSSION
RESULTS
7
Official (Closed), Non‐Sensitive
LOCATION: METHOD:
DATE: TIME:
TESTER: WEATHER:
S/N TIME (sec) SPEED (km/h) S/N TIME (sec) SPEED (km/h)
1 26
2 27
3 28
4 29
5 30
6 31
7 32
8 33
9 34
10 35
11 36
12 37
13 38
14 39
15 40
16 41
17 42
18 43
19 44
20 45
21 46
22 47
23 48
24 49
25 50
8
Official (Closed), Non‐Sensitive
LOCATION: METHOD:
DATE: TIME:
TESTER: WEATHER:
S/N TIME (sec) SPEED (km/h) S/N TIME (sec) SPEED (km/h)
1 26
2 27
3 28
4 29
5 30
6 31
7 32
8 33
9 34
10 35
11 36
12 37
13 38
14 39
15 40
16 41
17 42
18 43
19 44
20 45
21 46
22 47
23 48
24 49
25 50
9
Official (Closed), Non‐Sensitive
SINGAPORE POLYTECHNIC
School of Architecture and the Built Environment
Diploma in Civil Engineering
EXPERIMENT NO. 3
Abrasion Test
AIM
APPARATUS
INTRODUCTION
Due to the movement of traffic, the road stones used in the surfacing are
subjected to wearing action at the top of the pavement. Resistance to wear or
hardness is hence an essential property of the road aggregates, especially
when used in the wearing course.
The Los Angeles Abrasion Test is commonly used to determine the abrasion
resistance of the aggregates.
The principle of Los Angeles Abrasion Test is to find the percentage of wear
due to the rubbing action between the aggregates and the abrasive charge,
the steel spheres. The rubbing and pounding action simulate the field
conditions where both the abrasion and impact occur.
PROCEDURE
10
Official (Closed), Non‐Sensitive
CALCULATIONS
W 1 W 2
Percentage wear = 100%
W1
RESULTS
Type of aggregate =
Grading of aggregate =
Weight of charge =
DISCUSSION
(a) Name the other tests which can be used to determine the quality of the
aggregates
(b) How is Los Angeles Abrasion Value expressed?
REFERENCE
11
Official (Closed), Non‐Sensitive
SINGAPORE POLYTECHNIC
School of Architecture and the Built Environment
Diploma in Civil Engineering
EXPERIMENT NO. 4
Softening Point of Bitumen
AIM
INTRODUCTION
APPARATUS
(a) Rings
(b) Pouring plate
(c) Balls
(d) Ball-centering guides
(e) Bath
(f) Ring holder and assembly
(g) Thermometer
PROCEDURE
2. The rings and assembly, and two ball bearings, are placed in a liquid
bath filled to a depth of 105 ± 3 mm and the whole maintained at a
temperature of 5 ± 1 °C for 15 minutes.
12
Official (Closed), Non‐Sensitive
DATA SHEET
RESULTS
13
Official (Closed), Non‐Sensitive
DISCUSSION
1. Check whether the difference between the higher and lower readings is
within the maximum allowable range. If the maximum range is
exceeded, discuss possible causes and suggest ways to improve the
readings.
REFERENCE
14
Official (Closed), Non‐Sensitive
SINGAPORE POLYTECHNIC
School of Architecture and the Built Environment
Diploma in Civil Engineering
EXPERIMENT NO. 5
Marshall Stability Test
AIM
APPARATUS
(a) Oven
(b) Thermometer
(c) Spatula
(d) Mould assembly
(e) Compaction machine
(f) Extractor
(g) Marshall testing machine
INTRODUCTION
When a road is designed, the road engineer has to design a suitable paving
mixture of bitumen and aggregate to carry the vehicular loads.
The stability of the test specimen is the maximum load which the standard test
specimen will develop. The flow value is the total movement occurring in the
specimen between no load and the maximum load during the stability test.
PROCEDURE
15
Official (Closed), Non‐Sensitive
1.5
0.5
40 50 60 70 80
Specimen Height (mm)
The standard height (or thickness) of the specimen is 63.5 mm (or 2.5 in). In
cases where the specimen height deviates from 63.5 mm, the measured
Marshall Stability value need to be corrected. This is done by multiplying the
measured Marshall Stability value by an appropriate correction factor as given
in the chart above or using the Table below:
Thickness of
Specimen Correction Factor
(mm)
57.10 1.19
58.70 1.14
60.30 1.09
61.90 1.04
63.50 1.00
65.10 0.96
66.70 0.93
68.30 0.89
69.90 0.86
RESULTS
16
Official (Closed), Non‐Sensitive
REPORTING OF RESULTS
Report the Marshall Stability Value (kN) and Flow (in 0.254mm units) of the
specimen
DISCUSSION
(a) Discuss the significance of the Marshall Stability Value and Flow
(b) Check whether the Marshall Stability Value and Flow meets the LTA’s
requirement for Asphaltic Concrete. If not, discuss the possible
adjustments to the binder content and aggregate grading to satisfy the
requirement
REFERENCE
ASTM Standard D6927, 2006, "Standard Test Method for Marshall Stability
and Flow of Bituminous Mixtures," ASTM International, West Conshohocken,
PA, 2006, www.astm.org.
17
Official (Closed), Non‐Sensitive
SINGAPORE POLYTECHNIC
School of Architecture and the Built Environment
Diploma in Civil Engineering
EXPERIMENT NO. 6
Sieve Analysis of Aggregates for Subbase Material
AIM
INTRODUCTION
APPARATUS
18
Official (Closed), Non‐Sensitive
PROCEDURE
b) The sample consists of coarse aggregates between 400 g and 500g & fine
aggregates between 500 g and 600 g respectively.
d) Place the sieve stack on the mechanical sieve shaker. The shaker shall run
for 10 minutes, controlled by an automatic shut-off timer.
e) Remove the sieve stack from the sieve shaker and weigh the amount of
aggregates retained on each sieve.
a) Enter all information into the data sheet provided and calculate the
percentage passing each sieve.
Date: __________
75
37.5
10
0.600
0.075
Pan
Total
19
Official (Closed), Non‐Sensitive
DISCUSSION
b) List at least three (3) precautions that you should take to ensure best
results.
c) Comment on the grading curve of the sample and state whether it comply
with the mix gradation specified by LTA.
REFERENCE
20
Official (Closed), Non‐Sensitive
21
Official (Closed), Non‐Sensitive
SINGAPORE POLYTECHNIC
School of Architecture and the Built Environment
Diploma in Civil Engineering
EXPERIMENT NO. 7
California Bearing Ratio Test
AIM
To evaluate the relative quality of sub-grade, sub-base and base soils for
pavements in terms of their load-bearing capacities based on the California
Bearing Ratio (CBR).
INTRODUCTION
All materials used in road construction (i.e. existing sub-grade, sub-base and
base course) should be tested to determine the amount of cover material
required to prevent failure of the soil layer resulting from traffic loading. The
thickness of each of these layers depends on the CBR value of the layer
below.
APPARATUS
(a) CBR standard mould: diameter 152 mm, height 127 mm with
detachable base-plate and extension collar
(b) Metal rammer: weight 4.5 kg, standard drop 450 mm
(c) Constant rate strain compression machine for applying test load on
metal plunger: plunger area 19.35 cm2
(d) Surcharge weights
PROCEDURE
22
Official (Closed), Non‐Sensitive
(e) Put a filter paper on the bottom of the mould and fill the mould in 5
equal layers, each layer compacted with 61 blows of the standard
rammer
(f) Remove the collar and trim the surface flush with the top of the mould.
Determine the weight of the mould with the base-plate and soil
(g) Place the mould onto the testing machine. Cover the soil with a piece
of filter paper
(h) Lower the plunger to sit on the soil with a load of about 50 N. Set the
dial gauges to zero
(i) Start the compression machine (which has been set at a rate of 1.25
mm/min) and take readings of the load at penetrations given in the data
sheet
(j) Stop the machine, raise the plunger and remove the mould
(k) Determine moisture content of the sample
RESULTS
Enter all the information collected above in the data sheet provided.
CALCULATIONS
(d) From a curve of load against penetration, determine the load for 2.5-
mm and 5-mm penetration. Find the percentage ratio of this load
against a standard load of 13.2 kN for 2.5 mm and 20.0 kN for 5 mm.
The higher value is rounded off to the nearest integer and taken as the
CBR. Make any necessary corrections for the curves drawn.
REFERENCES
AASHTO (2013). T193-13: Standard Method of Test for the California Bearing
Ratio. Washington, American Association of State and Highway
Transportation Officials.
23
Official (Closed), Non‐Sensitive
DATA SHEET
● DETERMINATION OF DENSITY
Mass of soil kg
Volume of mould m3
Sample number 1 2
Container number
Mass of container g
Mass of water g
Moisture content6 %
4
Wet density = Mass of wet soil / Volume of mould
5
Dry density = Wet density / [1 + (Moisture Content / 100%)]
6
Moisture content = (Mass of water / Mass of dry sample) × 100%
24
Official (Closed), Non‐Sensitive
● LOAD/PENETRATION RELATIONSHIP
0.50
0.75
1.00
1.50
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
Plot Plunger Load (kN) versus Plunger Penetration (mm) on graph paper
DISCUSSION
Based on the CBR of the soil sample tested, discuss its suitability as sub-
grade, sub-base and base material for the construction of Singapore roads.
25
Official (Closed), Non‐Sensitive
SINGAPORE POLYTECHNIC
School of Architecture and the Built Environment
Diploma in Civil Engineering
EXPERIMENT NO. 8
Skid Resistance Test
AIM
APPARATUS
INTRODUCTION
PROCEDURE
REPORT OF RESULTS
26
Official (Closed), Non‐Sensitive
DATA SHEET
- Asphalt
- Concrete
DISCUSSION
(a) Explain briefly the significance of the skid resistance for bituminous
surfacings
(b) Discuss the suitability of the skid resistance value for the site where the
tests were conducted
REFERENCE
27