Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BP1/57636/23
DBAM 902: RESEARCH METHODS IN BUSINESS
ASSIGNMENT: CONCEPTUAL AND THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
INTRODUCTION
Theoretical and conceptual frameworks guide the paths of a research and offers the
foundation for establishing its credibility. Though these terms seem similar, they are different
from each other in concept and in their roles in the research inquiry.
The theoretical and conceptual framework explains the path of a research and grounds it
firmly in theoretical constructs. The overall aim of the two frameworks is to make research
findings more meaningful, acceptable to the theoretical constructs in the research field and
ensures generalizability.
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Theoretical framework is a framework based on an existing theory in a field of inquiry that is
related and/or reflects the hypothesis of a study. It is a blueprint that is often borrowed by the
researcher to build his/her own house or research inquiry. It serves as the foundation upon
which a research is constructed and guides the researcher so that he would not deviate from
the confines of the accepted theories to make his final contribution scholarly and academic.
A theoretical framework provides the theoretical assumptions for the larger context of a study,
and is the foundation by which a study is developed. This framework helps to ground the
research focus understudy within theoretical underpinnings and to frame the inquiry for data
analysis and interpretation (Grant & Osanloo 2014).
The theoretical framework consists of theoretical principles, constructs, concepts, and tenants
of a theory (Grant & Osanloo, 2014).
1. Grand Theories
Grand theories are broad and abstract, offering a comprehensive perspective on complex
phenomena. They are not meant to provide specific predictions or explanations for particular
situations but rather offer a wide lens through which to understand large-scale and complex
interactions. Example is the Human Capital Theory founded in HRM, positing that employees
are assets to the organization whose value can be enhanced through investment in their
education, training, and development. Systems Theory which views organizations as complex
systems composed of interrelated and interdependent parts is also an example of grand
theories.
2. Middle-Range Theories
Middle-range theories are more focused than grand theories and are designed to address
specific phenomena or concepts. These theories are particularly valued for their ability to
connect abstract theoretical ideas with empirical observation, making them highly applicable
across various disciplines, including sociology, nursing, psychology, and business. A good
example is
Kurt Lewin's Change Management Model that describes organizational change as a three-
stage process: unfreezing, changing, and refreezing. This model has been fundamental in
understanding how organizations implement change and has informed countless strategies for
managing organizational change.
3. Substantive Theories
Substantive theories are specific to a particular problem or area of inquiry. They are
developed based on empirical data collected from specific field studies and are designed to
explain phenomena within a particular context or setting. These theories are often used in
grounded theory research, where the theory emerges from the data collected during the
research process.
Equity Theory in HRM which focuses on employee perceptions of fairness in compensation,
recognition, and workload is an example. Employee Engagement Theory which explores the
psychological conditions and workplace environments that foster a high level of employee
involvement, enthusiasm, and commitment to their work and organization is another example
of substantive theory as it looks at factors that influence engagement levels and how they
impact organizational performance.
4. Descriptive Theories
Descriptive theories aim to thoroughly describe a phenomenon, situation, or behaviour rather
than predict or explain it. They provide a systematic depiction of the characteristics, qualities,
and functions of the phenomena studied. Descriptive theories are valuable in the early stages
of studying new or complex phenomena. Examples are HRM Practice Models that describe
specific HR practices or systems and their application within organizations. Examples include
descriptions of various recruitment and selection practices, training and development
programs, performance management systems, and compensation and benefits structures. They
detail the components, processes, and effectiveness of these practices in organizational
settings.
6. Analytical Theories
Analytical theories provide a framework for understanding the underlying mechanisms or
processes that explain phenomena. These theories dissect complex phenomena into simpler
components to understand how they work together. Analytical theories are common in fields
such as economics, where models are used to predict market behaviours, or in psychology, to
understand cognitive processes. Example is Supply and Demand theory which is a
fundamental analytical theory in economics that explains how the prices of goods and services
are determined in a market. It analyses the interaction between the supply of products and the
demand from consumers, demonstrating how changes in these factors influence market
equilibrium and prices.
Production function theory analyses the relationship between inputs (such as labour and
capital) and outputs (goods and services) in the production process is also an analytical
theory. It provides a mathematical representation of how factors of production contribute to
the creation of goods and services, aiding in optimizing production efficiency
7. Empirical Theories
Empirical theories are developed based on observed phenomena and are grounded in
empirical evidence. They aim to explain and predict phenomena by drawing on systematic
observations or experiments. Empirical theories are testable and are often used in the natural
and social sciences. Psychological Contract Theory describes the unwritten expectations and
obligations that exist between employees and employers. Social Exchange Theory, applied in
HRM, explains the dynamics of employment relationships based on the principle of
reciprocity. Employees contribute effort, time, and skills to the organization, expecting certain
rewards in return. This theory has empirical support in explaining employee attitudes,
commitment, and performance in the workplace.
8. Interdisciplinary Theories
Interdisciplinary theories draw upon concepts and propositions from multiple disciplines to
create a comprehensive framework that spans beyond the boundaries of a single field. These
theories are particularly useful in addressing complex issues that cannot be fully understood
through a single disciplinary lens, such as environmental studies, public health, and global
studies. Examples include:
Behavioural Economics
Disciplines involved: Economics, Psychology.
Behavioural economics integrates insights from psychology into economic theory,
challenging traditional assumptions about rational decision-making. It explores how
psychological factors, such as cognitive biases and emotions, influence economic choices and
market outcomes.
Social Entrepreneurship
Disciplines involved: Business, Sociology, Social Sciences.
Social entrepreneurship combines business principles with social and environmental goals. It
explores how entrepreneurial strategies can address societal challenges, emphasizing social
impact alongside financial sustainability.
To make an appropriate selection of a theoretical context, one must consider the guiding
principles of the study and situate the problem in relation to it. The research questions of the
study and the purpose of the study must entail noticeable aspects of the theoretical framework
and must agree with the assertions promulgated by the theorists of the selected theory.
After the entire study has been conducted, the research findings accrued from the study must
corroborate, extend, or modify the existing theory that was borrowed for the study. The
researcher may critique, develop and/or expand the theory that served as a guide for his/her
study vis-à-vis the findings gleaned from the study (Grant & Osanloo, 2014).
Simon and Goes (2011) suggested some points that can help articulate the theory for an
informed research as follows:
1. Clearly Define Your Research Problem or Question:
Articulate the specific research problem or question you aim to address. This clarity is
essential to identify relevant theories that can inform your study.
2. Review Existing Literature:
Conduct a thorough literature review to identify existing theories and frameworks relevant to
your research problem. This review helps you understand the current state of knowledge in
your field.
3. Identify Key Concepts and Variables:
Extract key concepts, variables, and relationships from the theories you've reviewed. Clearly
define these elements as they will form the basis of your theoretical framework.
4. Justify the Choice of Theoretical Framework:
Explain why you have chosen a particular theoretical framework. Discuss its relevance,
applicability, and explanatory power in the context of your research problem.
5. Operationalize Concepts and Variables:
Operationalize the abstract concepts and variables from your theoretical framework into
measurable and observable terms. This step is crucial for designing your research
methodology.
6. Hypothesize Relationships:
Develop hypotheses based on the relationships proposed by the theoretical framework.
Clearly state the expected connections between variables and concepts.
7. Align Research Questions/Objectives:
Ensure that your research questions or objectives align with the concepts and relationships
outlined in your theoretical framework. This alignment ensures that your study directly
addresses the issues identified in the literature.
8. Guide the Research Design:
Use the theoretical framework to guide the selection of your research design, data collection
methods, and data analysis techniques. The framework should inform your choices and help
you structure your study.
9. Consider Limitations and Alternative Explanations:
Acknowledge any limitations or alternative explanations provided by the theoretical
framework. Consider potential criticisms or alternative viewpoints to strengthen the
robustness of your study.
10. Incorporate Theoretical Insights in Analysis and Interpretation:
During the data analysis phase, apply the theoretical insights from your framework. Interpret
your findings in light of the theoretical concepts and relationships you've identified.
11. Discuss Implications and Contributions:
Discuss the implications of your study's findings in the context of the theoretical framework.
Highlight how your research contributes to or challenges existing theories and knowledge in
the field.
12. Synthesize Findings with Theoretical Constructs:
In your conclusion, synthesize your study's findings with the theoretical constructs. Discuss
how your empirical results either support or challenge the theoretical predictions.
13. Recommendations for Future Research:
Propose recommendations for future research based on the insights gained from your study.
Consider how further research can build upon or refine the theoretical framework.
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
A conceptual framework outlines the specific ideas or concepts that a study will investigate. It
is a system of concepts, assumptions, expectations, beliefs, and theories that supports and
informs research. The conceptual framework serves to connect the researcher's general
research approach to the specific inquiry. It helps in clarifying the research's direction by
defining the key concepts, their relationships, and the context within which the research is
conducted.
A conceptual framework is a structure which the researcher believes can best explain the
natural progression of the phenomenon to be studied. (Camp, 2001). It is the researcher’s
explanation of how the research problem would be explored and it is linked with the concepts,
empirical research and important theories used in promoting and systemizing the knowledge
espoused by the researcher (Peshkin, 1993).
The conceptual framework presents an integrated way of looking at a problem under study. In
a statistical perspective, the conceptual framework describes the relationship between the
main concepts of a study. It is arranged in a logical structure to aid provide a picture or visual
display of how ideas in a study relate to one another (Grant & Osanloo, 2014). It shows the
series of action the researcher intends carrying out in a research study.
The framework makes it easier for the researcher to easily specify and define the concepts
within the problem of the study (Luse, Mennecke & Townsend, 2012).
Fisher (2007) noted that a good conceptual framework must also be expressed in writing for
it to be understood clearly. This means that after a researcher has craftily produced a
diagrammatic representation of the main variables of the study, he has to explain the relations
among them and how their complementation helps in answering the major research problem
defined.
The following steps can be followed in constructing a conceptual framework:
1. Identify and Review Relevant Literature: Start by conducting a thorough literature
review to identify key concepts, theories, and gaps in the existing research.
2. Define Key Concepts: Clearly define the concepts that are central to your research
question.
3. Establish Relationships: Determine how these concepts are related to each other
within the context of your study.
4. Visual Representation: Optionally, create a visual diagram to represent these
relationships, making the conceptual framework more accessible.
Source: Adapted from West and Dawson (2012); and Njenga and Gachunga (2016)
Dependent Variable Independent Variable
Training and
development
Employee
productivity
Occupational
safety and health
practices
Intrinsic rewards
(Recognition)
Mediating Variable
Source: Adapted from West and Dawson (2012); and Njenga and Gachunga (2016)
REFERENCES
Akintoye, A. (2015). Developing Theoretical and Conceptual Frameworks.
Camp, W. G. (2001). Formulating and Evaluating Theoretical Frameworks for Career and
Technical Education Research. Journal of Vocational Educational Research, 26 (1), 27-39.
Evans, M. (2007). Recent Research (2000 - 2006) into Applied Linguistics and Language
Teaching with Specific Reference to L2 French. Language Teaching, 40: 211 - 230.
Latham,J.(2017).ConceptualFramework.http://johnlatham.me/frameworks/
researchmethods-framework/conceptual-framework
Luse, A., Mennecke, B., & Townsend, A. (2012). Selecting a Research Topic: A
Framework for Doctoral Students. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 7, 143-152.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Source
Book (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. 23-29
Ravitch, S. M. & Carl, N. M. (2016). Qualitative Research: Bridging the Conceptual,
Theoretical and Methodological. Los Angeles, U.S.A.: SAGE Publications