Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Definition
In a suitable category (like RepK Q , A-Mod K-Vect) pair of morphisms i p with
( ) ( , )
cod i dom p is called a short exact sequence iff i is injective, p is surjective and
( ) = ( )
Im i p.
( ) = ker( )
X ⏪i⏫ Y ⏪p⏫ Z
◊
Observation
By the first isomorphism theorem, Y / ker( ) ≅p Im p .( )
Y p Im p
Y - Im i Z
dim( / ker( )) = dim( ( ))
Y- X Z
dim( ) dim( ( )) = dim( )
dim( Y X
) = dim( ) + dim( Z ).
Definition
The dimension vector of a representation V of a quiver Q is V Vi i Q Z Q .
dim ( ) = (dim( )) ∈
0
0 = { 1,..., } dim ( ) ∈
Proposition
The dimension vector is additive on exact sequences:
if U ⏪⏫ V ⏪⏫ W is an exact sequence of representations of Q, then,
𝜄 𝜋
dim ( V ) = dim ( U ) + dim ( W. )
Proof
Component-wise, we have for every i Q : ∈ 0
Ui ⏪i⏫ Vi ⏪i⏫ Wi and we claim that this is an exact sequence of vector spaces.
𝜄 𝜋
Im i
0 0
(𝜄 ) = ker(𝜋 ) i
for all i Q . ∈ 0
Definition
Let Q be a quiver. From the equivalence relation "isomorphism of representations", we
consider the quotient class XQ . We write Z XQ to denote the free Abelian group with basis ⟨ ⟩
XQ .
In Z XQ , let EQ be the subgroup generated by the set
⟨ ⟩
K Q Z XQ EQ 0( ) := ⟨ ⟩/
V U W.
[ ] = [ ]+[ ]
Proposition
Let Q be a quiver with vertex set Q n. = { 1,..., }
Φ: 0
( )→ Φ([ ]) = dim ( )
Proof.
If V and W are isomorphic representations, then Vi ≅ Wi are isomorphic vector spaces, hence,
they have the same dimension. Thus, V W [ ] = [ ] ⟹ dim ( V W.
) = dim ( )
V - U - W
0 = Φ([ ]) Φ([ ]) Φ([ ]) = Φ([ V-U-W
] [ ] [ ])
Thus, since EQ
Φ( Zn , there is a unique group homomorphism
) = 0 Φ: Z XQ EQ Zn such
⟨ ⟩/ →
Z XQ
Φ
⟨ ⟩ Zn
𝜋
Φ
Z XQ EQ
⟨ ⟩/
Definition/Proposition
Let A be a finite dimensional algebra and M ≠ 0 a finite dimensional A-module. Then, there
is a "finite filtration" M M
0 =
(0)
𝜄1
(1)
𝜄2
... M k such that the quotients M i M i-
𝜄 k ( ) ( )
/
( 1)
are simple.
In particular, M i-( 1)
i M i ⏪i⏫ M i M i-
𝜄
( )
𝜋
( )
/
( 1)
is short exact.
A filtration like that is called a "composition series" of M, and the quotients, counted with
multiplicity, are called the "composition factors".
Proof.
Claim 1. M admits a maximal proper submodule.
Recall that M is a finite dimensional vector space, so, any of its subspaces will also be finite
dimensional, in particular, all submodules are finite dimensional.
If M did not have a maximal proper submodule, then, for any proper submodule L M, ⊂
However, we can apply this argument arbitrarily, which would contradict the condition of M
being finite dimensional.
Hence, M admits a maximal proper submodule L M. ⊂
Claim 1 is proven.
We can repeat the argument by replacing M with L and L with a maximal submodule of L.
This process will terminate, as the dimension of the maximal submodule strictly decreases.
𝜄i is just an inclusion!
Theorem
Let Q be an acyclic quiver with Q n . Then, the group homomorphism
= { 1,..., }
Φ: 0( )→ {[ ( )] : ∈ 0} ⊆ 0( )
K Q.0( )
Proof.
We prove that {[ Si i Q
( )] : ∈ 0} is a basis by showing linear independence and spanning.
Notice that dim ( S i ei Zn , the i-th basis vector of the canonical basis.
( )) = ∈
∑
i
n
If ai S i [ ( )] = 0 , where ai ∈ Z, then we can apply Φ ∑
i
n
to get ai dim ( Si
( )) = ∑i n aiei ,
= 0
so ai for all i.
=1 =1 =1
= 0
Si i Q K Q.
⟨{[ ( )] : ∈ 0 }⟩ = 0( )
Since M i- i
M i ⏪i⏫ M i M i- is short exact for all i Q , we have that
( 1)
𝜄
( )
𝜋
( )
/
( 1)
∈ 0
Mi ( )
= M i- M i M i-
( 1)
+
( )
/
( 1)
M (1)
= M M M
(0)
+
(1)
/
(0)
M (2)
= M M M
(1)
+
(2)
/
(1)
M (3)
= M M M
(2)
+
(3)
/
(2)
...
Mk ( )
= M k- M k M k-
( 1)
+
( )
/
( 1)
because { Si i Q
( ): ∈ 0} is a complete set of representatives of the simple representations.
Theorem (Jordan-Hölder)
Let Q be an acyclic quiver with Q n . Let V be a representation. Then, V
0 = { 1,..., } ≠ 0
admits a composition series and its composition factors are given by the dimension vector
(counted with multiplicity).
Proof.
Recall:
Let f G G be a group homomorphism, H a normal subgroup and f H
: → ' ( ) = 1 G . Then, there
is a unique map ⏨
f G H G such that the following diagram commutes:
'
: / → '
f
G G '
𝜋 ⏨f
G H /
In other words, f ⏨f . = ∘𝜋
Indeed, define ⏨
f G H G by g ⏨f g : / → ' [ ] ↦ ([ ]) = f g . We check that it is well defined:
( )
[g- g
1] = [ 2]
gg H 1
∈
f g g- f g f g- f g f g -
1 2
1 1 1
1 2
= ( 1) 2
= ( 1) ( 2) = 1
fg fg
( 1) = ( 2)
⏨f g
([ 1 ]) = ⏨f g
([ 2 ]).