ASSIGNMENT / TUGASAN

1/20
 ABPC2203
ETHICS IN PSYCHOLOGY
JANUARY 2024 SEMESTER
___________________________________________________________________________

SPECIFIC INSTRUCTION / ARAHAN KHUSUS

1. Answer in Malay or English. /

Jawab dalam Bahasa Melayu atau Bahasa Inggeris.

2. Number of words: 2500 – 3000 words excluding references. /

Jumlah patah perkataan: 2500 – 3000 patah perkataan tidak termasuk rujukan.

3. Submit your assignment ONCE only in a MULTIPLE file. /

Hantar tugasan SEKALI sahaja dalam PELBAGAI fail.

4. Submit your assignment ONLINE. /

Tugasan ini dihantar secara ONLINE.

5. Submission date : 10th MARCH 2024/

Tarikh penghantaran : 10 MAC 2024.

6. This assignment accounts for 60% of the total marks for the course. /
Tugasan ini menyumbang sebanyak 60% dari jumlah markah kursus.

ASSIGNMENT QUESTION

PURPOSE

2/20
The purpose of this assignment is to enhance learners’ knowledge about good ethics and
consequences of unethical practice.

PART I

QUESTION 1: REPORT WRITING (30%)

Scenario:
Dr. Emily Rodriguez is a psychologist conducting a research study on the long-term effects of
childhood trauma on adult mental health. Her study involves collecting sensitive information
through interviews with participants who have experienced various forms of trauma during
their childhood. Dr. Rodriguez faces an ethical dilemma regarding the balance between
transparency in research and the protection of participant privacy. As Dr. Rodriguez analyzes
the data, she discovers compelling findings that could contribute significantly to the
understanding of the impact of childhood trauma. However, some of the participants shared
stories during interviews that could potentially identify them, even with anonymization
efforts in place. Dr. Rodriguez is now torn between the ethical obligation to disseminate
valuable research findings for the greater good and the responsibility to protect the
confidentiality and privacy of her study participants.

Based on the given scenario, you are required to answer the following questions and
support with relevant examples and literature from reliable and reputable sources.

1. Suggest how Dr. Rodriguez might emotionally react when she discovers compelling
findings in her research that could significantly contribute to the field but also
realizes that some participants’ privacy could be compromised.

2. Discuss the ethical values that are in conflict for Dr. Rodriguez as she struggles with
the decision to balance transparency in research and the protection of participant
privacy. Which priorities might she weigh more heavily, and why?
3. Examine the steps Dr. Rodriguez could take to organize her research findings in a
way that maximizes transparency while minimizing potential harm to participants’
privacy.

3/20
 4. Imagine Dr. Rodriguez decides to prioritize participant privacy over full transparency
in reporting. Suggest your viewpoint on how this decision might impact her
credibility and ethical standing of her work.

[Total: 30 marks]

QUESTION 2: POWERPOINT SLIDES AND VIDEO PRESENTATION (20%)

You are required to record your presentation on ethics codes on professional competence.
Organize your content into PowerPoint slides and deliver a presentation on the topic. The
presentation must be recorded within 10 to 15 minutes, and the video is required to be
uploaded in a separate video file (MPEG/mp4/etc.). Kindly test your video recording before

4/20
submission to avoid any technical glitches. The video presentation must have the following
deliverables:

1. Introduction.
2. Examine on various codes of ethics on professional competence standards. Highlight
the essential principles in each code that should upheld within the professional
competence. (Professional competence is a crucial aspect of ethical practice in
psychology. Various codes of ethics provide guidance on the essential principles that
should be upheld within professional competence. The American Psychological
Association (APA) Code of Ethics (2010) states that psychologists should provide
services, teach, and conduct research only within the boundaries of their competence
based on their education, training, supervised experience, consultation, study, or
professional experience. The Australian Psychological Society (APS) Code of Ethics
(2007) emphasizes that psychologists should bring and maintain appropriate skills
and learning to their areas of professional practice. They should only provide
psychological services that are within their competence, and they should seek
supervision or refer clients to other professionals when necessary.The American
Counseling Association (ACA) Code of Ethics (2005) states that counselors should
recognize the need for continuing education to acquire and maintain a reasonable
level of awareness of current scientific and professional information in their fields of
activity. They should take steps to maintain competence and seek additional training
or supervision when necessary. The Board of Counselors Code of Ethics (2016)
emphasizes that counselors have a responsibility to read, understand, and follow the
code of ethics and adhere to applicable laws and regulations. They should engage in
ongoing study, education, training, and consultation in their areas of practice.Overall,
the essential principles of professional competence include acquiring and maintaining
appropriate skills and learning, recognizing the boundaries of one's competence,
seeking supervision or referring clients to other professionals when necessary,
engaging in ongoing education and training, and adhering to ethical and legal
standards. These principles are crucial for ensuring that psychologists and counselors
provide effective and ethical services to their clients.)

5/20
 3. Reflect on how valuing and upholding the ethical standards contribute to the
trustworthiness and effectiveness of the psychologist in their professional role.
(Valuing and upholding ethical standards is crucial for psychologists to maintain their
trustworthiness and effectiveness in their professional role. Ethical standards provide
a framework for psychologists to ensure that they are providing services that are
both effective and ethical. By adhering to ethical standards, psychologists can build
trust with their clients, colleagues, and the broader community.When psychologists
uphold ethical standards, they demonstrate their commitment to protecting the
rights and well-being of their clients. This can help to build trust with clients, who are
more likely to feel comfortable sharing personal information and seeking help when
they believe that their psychologist is acting in their best interests. Additionally,
upholding ethical standards can help to prevent harm to clients, which is a
fundamental principle of ethical practice in psychology.Furthermore, valuing and
upholding ethical standards can enhance the effectiveness of psychologists in their
professional role. By adhering to ethical standards, psychologists can ensure that they
are providing services that are based on sound scientific principles and that are
tailored to the unique needs of their clients. This can help to improve the quality of
psychological services and increase the likelihood of positive outcomes for clients.)
4. Conclusion.

The video must consist of both the presenter's appearance and the slideshow. Please ensure
that the audio and video are clear and free of interruptions. Check your presentation slide
and ensure your presentation slides have as minimal grammatical errors as possible before
submitting it. You are expected to submit the slides from your PowerPoint presentation and
also the video presentation through the platform that has been provided to you by the
Assessment and Examination Division.

[Total: 50 marks]

6/20
PART II: ONLINE CLASS PARTICIPATION (10%)

This part requires students to participate actively in the MyINSPIRE eforum. Discuss the
following topics with your tutor and peers in the eforum online discussion and then submit
proof of your participation.

1. In your opinion, what are the potential long-term consequences of unethical

practices in a professional setting for both individual practitioner and industry?
2. From your perspective, what roles does the ethical conduct play in fostering a
positive and collaborative work environment?

Support your discussions with relevant examples.

[Total: 10 marks]

7/20
 SOALAN TUGASAN

TUJUAN

Tujuan tugasan ini adalah untuk meningkatkan pengetahuan pelajar tentang etika yang baik
dan kesan praktis yang tidak beretika.

Bahagian I
SOALAN 1: PENULISAN LAPORAN (30%)

Dr. Emily Rodriguez ialah ahli psikologi yang menjalankan kajian penyelidikan tentang
kesan jangka panjang trauma kanak-kanak terhadap kesihatan mental orang dewasa.
Kajian beliau melibatkan pengumpulan maklumat sensitif melalui temu bual dengan
peserta yang pernah mengalami pelbagai bentuk trauma semasa zaman kanak-kanak.
Dr. Rodriguez menghadapi dilema etika mengenai keseimbangan antara ketelusan
dalam penyelidikan dan perlindungan privasi peserta. Semasa Dr. Rodriguez
menganalisis data, beliau mendapati penemuan menarik yang boleh menyumbang
dengan ketara kepada pemahaman tentang kesan trauma zaman kanak-kanak. Walau
bagaimanapun, sesetengah peserta yang berkongsi cerita semasa sesi temu bual,
berpotensi untuk dikenal pasti, walaupun identiti mereka telah dilindungi. Dr. Rodriguez
kini tersepit antara kewajipan etika untuk menyebarkan penemuan penyelidikan yang
berharga demi kebaikan yang lebih besar dan tanggungjawab untuk melindungi
kerahsiaan dan privasi peserta kajiannya.

Berdasarkan situasi yang diberikan, anda dikehendaki untuk menjawab soalan-soalan

berikut dan sokong jawapan anda dengan literatur dari sumber yang boleh dipercayai
dan bereputasi.

8/20
1. Cadangkan kemungkinan tindak balas emosi Dr. Rodriguez apabila dia menemui
penemuan menarik dalam penyelidikannya yang boleh menyumbang dengan
ketara kepada bidang tersebut tetapi juga menyedari bahawa sesetengah privasi
peserta boleh terjejas.
2. Bincangkan konflik nilai etika yang dihadapi oleh Dr. Rodriguez ketika dia
bergelut dengan keputusan untuk mengimbangi ketelusan dalam penyelidikan
dan perlindungan privasi peserta. Keutamaan mana yang mungkin dia lebih
menitik beratkan, dan mengapa?
3. Teliti langkah yang boleh diambil oleh Dr. Rodriguez untuk menyusun penemuan
penyelidikannya dengan cara yang memaksimumkan ketelusan sambil
meminimumkan potensi bahaya kepada privasi peserta.
4. Bayangkan Dr. Rodriguez memutuskan untuk mengutamakan privasi peserta
berbanding ketelusan penuh dalam pelaporan. Cadangkan pandangan anda
tentang cara keputusan ini boleh memberi kesan kepada kredibiliti dan
kedudukan etika kerjanya.
[Jumlah: 30 markah]

9/20
SOALAN 2: SLAID POWERPOINT DAN PENYAMPAIAN VIDEO (20%)

Anda dikehendaki merekodkan pembentangan anda tentang kod etika mengenai kecekapan
profesional. Susun kandungan anda ke dalam slaid PowerPoint dan sampaikan
pembentangan mengenai topik tersebut. Pembentangan mesti dirakam dalam masa 10
hingga 15 minit dan video perlu dimuat naik dalam fail video yang berasingan
(MPEG/mp4/dll.). Sila uji rakaman video anda sebelum penyerahan untuk mengelakkan
sebarang gangguan teknikal. Persembahan video mesti mempunyai kriteria berikut:

1. Pengenalan.
2. Meneliti pelbagai kod etika mengenai piawaian kecekapan profesional. Serlahkan
prinsip penting dalam setiap kod yang harus ditegakkan dalam kecekapan
profesional.
3. Refleksi bagaimana menghargai dan mempertahankan piawaian etika menyumbang
kepada kebolehpercayaan dan keberkesanan ahli psikologi dalam peranan
profesional mereka.
4. Kesimpulan.

Video mesti terdiri daripada penampilan penyampai dan tayangan slaid. Sila pastikan
bahawa audio dan video adalah jelas dan bebas daripada gangguan. Anda diminta untuk
menyemak slaid powerpoint anda dan pastikan isi kandungannya mempunyai kesalahan
tatabahasa yang rendah. Anda diharapkan untuk menghantar slaid PowerPoint dan video
melalui platform yang telah disediakan oleh Bahagian Penilaian dan Peperiksaan.

[Jumlah: 20 markah]

10/20
Bahagian II: PENYERTAAN KELAS DALAM TALIAN (10%)

Bahagian ini memerlukan pelajar untuk mengambil bahagian secara aktif dalam eforum
MyINSPIRE. Bincangkan topik berikut bersama tutor dan rakan anda melalui perbincangan
eforum dan hantarkan bukti penyertaan anda.

1. Pada pendapat anda, apakah kesan jangka masa panjang untuk praktis yang tidak
beretika didalam konteks profesional terhadap individu dan industri?
2. Pada pendapat anda, apakah peranan yang dimainkan oleh tingkah laku beretika
dalam memupuk persekitaran kerja yang positif dan kolaboratif?

Sokong perbincangan anda dengan contoh yang berkaitan.

[Jumlah: 10 markah]

11/20
 ATTACHMENT
ASSIGNMENT RUBRICS - PART I
ABPC2203/ ETHICS IN PSYCHOLOGY/JANUARY 2024
QUESTION/ SOALAN 1: REPORT WRITING (30%)

Unsatisfactory/
Excellent/ Good/ Fair/ Poor/
*QN/ Criteria/ Weight/ Tidak Max
CLO Cemerlang Baik Sederhana Lemah
*NS Kriteria Pemberat memuaskan Marks
4 3 2 1 0

1 3 Introduction. Excellent and very Good and Quite good and quite Poor introduction. There is no
comprehensive comprehensive comprehensive introduction
introduction. introduction. introduction. provided.
0.5 2
Pengenalan. Pengenalan yang Pengenalan yang Pengenalan yang Pengenalan yang Tiada
sangat baik dan baik dan agak baik dan agak lemah. pengenalan.
sangat komprehensif. komprehensif.
komprehensif.

1 3 Suggest how Dr. 1.5 The suggestion was The suggestion was The suggestion was The suggestion was There is no 6
Rodriguez might comprehensive clear with relevant brief with no vague and confusing. suggestion
emotionally react with relevant examples and examples. provided.
when she discovers examples and supported by
compelling findings in supported by literature from
her research that could literature from reputable sources.
significantly contribute reputable sources.
to the field but also
realizes that some
participants’ privacy
could be compromised.

Cadangan ringkas Cadangan samar-

Cadangkan Cadangan Cadangan jelas tanpa sebarang samar dan

12/20
 kemungkinan komprehensif dengan contoh yang contoh. mengelirukan. Tiada cadangan.
tindak balas emosi dengan contoh relevan dan
Dr. Rodriguez relevan yang jelas disokong oleh
apabila dia dan disokong oleh tinjauan literatur
menemui tinjauan literatur daripada sumber
penemuan menarik daripada sumber yang bereputasi.
dalam yang bereputasi.
penyelidikannya
yang boleh
menyumbang
dengan ketara
kepada bidang
tersebut tetapi juga
menyedari bahawa
sesetengah privasi
peserta boleh
terjejas.

1 3 Discuss the ethical 1.5 The discussion was The discussion was The discussion was The discussion was There is no 6
values that are in comprehensive clear with relevant brief with no vague and confusing. discussion
conflict for Dr. with relevant examples and examples. provided.
Rodriguez as she examples and supported by
struggles with the supported by literature from
decision to balance literature from reputable sources.
transparency in reputable sources.
research and the
protection of
participant privacy.
Which priorities might
she weigh more
heavily, and why? (The
discussion was
comprehensive with
relevant examples and
supported by literature Perbincangan jelas Perbincangan ringkas Perbincangan samar- Tiada

13/20
 from reputable Perbincangan dengan contoh yang tanpa sebarang samar dan perbincangan.
sources.) komprehensif relevan dan contoh. mengelirukan.
dengan contoh disokong oleh
relevan yang jelas tinjauan literatur
dan disokong oleh daripada sumber
tinjauan literatur yang bereputasi.
Bincangkan konflik daripada sumber
nilai etika yang yang bereputasi.
dihadapi oleh Dr.
Rodriguez ketika
dia bergelut
dengan keputusan
untuk
mengimbangi
ketelusan dalam
penyelidikan dan
perlindungan
privasi peserta.
Keutamaan mana
yang mungkin dia
lebih menitik
beratkan, dan
mengapa?

1 3 Examine the steps Dr. 1.5 The examination The examination The examination was The examination was There is no 6
Rodriguez could take to was comprehensive was clear with brief with no vague and confusing. examination
organize her research with relevant relevant examples examples. provided.
findings in a way that examples and and supported by
maximizes supported by literature from
transparency while literature from reputable sources.
minimizing potential reputable sources.
harm to participants’
privacy.

14/20
 Penelitian samar-
Penelitian jelas Penelitian ringkas samar dan
Teliti langkah yang Penelitian dengan contoh yang tanpa sebarang mengelirukan. Tiada penelitian.
boleh diambil oleh komprehensif relevan dan contoh.
Dr. Rodriguez dengan contoh disokong oleh
untuk menyusun relevan yang jelas tinjauan literatur
penemuan dan disokong oleh daripada sumber
penyelidikannya tinjauan literatur yang bereputasi.
dengan cara yang daripada sumber
memaksimumkan yang bereputasi.
ketelusan sambil
meminimumkan
potensi bahaya
kepada privasi
peserta.

1 3 Imagine Dr. Rodriguez 1.5 The suggestion was The suggestion was The suggestion was The suggestion was There is no 6
decides to prioritize comprehensive clear with relevant brief with no vague and confusing. suggestion
participant privacy with relevant examples and examples. provided.
over full transparency examples and supported by
in reporting. Suggest supported by literature from
your viewpoint on how literature from reputable sources.
this decision might reputable sources.
impact her credibility
and ethical standing of
her work.

Bayangkan Dr. Cadangan Cadangan jelas Cadangan ringkas Cadangan samar- Tiada cadangan.
Rodriguez komprehensif dengan contoh yang tanpa sebarang samar dan
memutuskan dengan contoh relevan dan contoh. mengelirukan.
untuk disokong oleh

15/20
 mengutamakan relevan yang jelas tinjauan literatur
privasi peserta dan disokong oleh daripada sumber
berbanding tinjauan literatur yang bereputasi.
ketelusan penuh daripada sumber
dalam pelaporan. yang bereputasi.
Cadangkan
pandangan anda
tentang cara
keputusan ini
boleh memberi
kesan kepada
kredibiliti dan
kedudukan etika
kerjanya.

1 1 Conclusion. The conclusion is The conclusion is The conclusion is There is no definite. There is no
excellent and links good and links the satisfactory but does The writing ends conclusion
the introduction, introduction, not link with the abruptly. provided.
content and is well content and is well introduction and
summarized. summarized. content.

Kesimpulan. 0.5 Kesimpulan sangat Kesimpulan adalah Kesimpulan Tidak kesimpulan yang Tiada kesimpulan 2
baik, menyimpulkan baik, menyimpulkan memuaskan tetapi jelas. Penulisan akhir diberikan.
semua bahagian semua bahagian tidak menyimpulkan begitu sahaja.
pengenalan, pengenalan, bahagian pengenalan
kandungan dan kandungan dan dan kandungan.
diringkaskan dengan diringkaskan dengan
baik. baik.

1 1 Citation and 0.5 More than four Four citations and Four citations and Less than four There is no 2
References citations and references provided references provided citations and citation or
references provided and all citations but not according to references provided. reference
and all citations sources and APA style. provided in this
sources and references assignment.

16/20
 references according to APA
according to APA style.
style.
Petikan dan rujukan Empat petikan dan Kurang daripada Tiada petikan dan
Menyatakan lebih Empat petikan dan rujukan diberikan empat petikan dan rujukan diberikan
daripada empat rujukan diberikan tetapi tidak mengikut rujukan diberikan. dalam tugasan ini
petikan dan rujukan dan semua sumber gaya APA.
diberikan dan petikan dan rujukan
semua sumber mengikut gaya APA.
petikan dan rujukan
mengikut gaya APA.

Total 7.5 30
*QN = Question Number

17/20
QUESTION/ SOALAN 2: POWERPOINT SLIDES AND VIDEO PRESENTATION (20%)

Excellent Good Fair Poor

Criteria Unsatisfactory Max
*QN CLO Weight
Marks
4 3 2 1 0

2 3 Presentation skill 1.0 Excellent eye contact, Good eye contact, no Inconsistent with Poor eye contact, No 4
no distracting distracting gestures, has eye contact, volume, volume too low or presentation
gestures, appropriate appropriate volume, and enunciation. loud, poor video.
volume, clear and overall clear Obvious distracting enunciation
consistent enunciation. mannerism(s).
enunciation. Creative
and charismatic.

Kemahiran Kontak mata yang Kontak mata yang baik, Tidak konsisten Kontak mata yang Tiada
pembentangan sangat baik, tiada tiada gerak isyarat yang dengan kontak mata, lemah, kelantangan pembentangan
gerak isyarat yang mengganggu, kelantangan dan terlalu rendah atau video
mengganggu, mempunyai kelantangan sebutan. kuat, sebutan yang
kelantangan yang yang sesuai, sebutan Mannerisme yang lemah
sesuai, sebutan yang yang jelas secara jelas mengganggu.
jelas dan konsisten. keseluruhan.
Kreatif dan
berkarisma.

2 3 Content 2.0 Comprehensive and Most important Much of the Majority of information All information 8
complete presentation information presented information irrelevant irrelevant and irrelevant and
of information. with little irrelevant info. and presentation only significant points left out of topic.
on some of major out.
points.

Penyampaian maklumat Maklumat yang paling
yang menyeluruh dan penting dibentangkan
lengkap. dengan sedikit maklumat
yang tidak berkaitan.
Kebanyakan maklumat Majoriti maklumat tidak Semua maklumat
tidak relevan dan relevan dan perkara tidak relevan dan
pembentangan hanya penting ditinggalkan. di luar topik.
pada beberapa perkara
utama.

2 3 Slides 1.0 All slides are 3-4 slides are attractive 2-3 slides are easy to The slides are not No slides 4

18/20
presentation attractive; and generally well- read. Amount of easy to read; badly
professional, clear, designed. Text is easy text is too great for designed. The font is
concise, and to read. Half of the the amount of space too small to be easily
appropriate. Text is slides use graphics to provided. Less than seen. Too much
easy to read. More enhance the half the slides have information is
than half of the slides presentation. Font size graphics. Font size is included.
use graphics to is appropriate for appropriate for Unimportant
enhance the reading. Appropriate reading. material is
presentation. The font information is included. highlighted. Listeners
on visuals is large may be confused.
enough to be seen by The amount of text is
all. Information is too great for the
organized to space provided.
maximize audience There is little use of
understanding. graphics or effects.
Details are minimized
so that the main
points stand out.

Persembahan Semua slaid menarik; 3-4 slaid adalah menarik 2-3 slaid mudah Slaid tidak mudah Tiada slaid
slaid profesional, jelas, dan umumnya direka dibaca. Jumlah teks dibaca; direka dengan
ringkas dan sesuai. dengan baik. Teks terlalu besar untuk teruk. Fon terlalu
Teks mudah dibaca. mudah dibaca. Separuh jumlah ruang yang kecil untuk dilihat
Lebih separuh daripada slaid disediakan. Kurang dengan mudah.
daripada slaid menggunakan grafik daripada separuh Terlalu banyak
menggunakan grafik untuk meningkatkan slaid mempunyai maklumat disertakan.
untuk meningkatkan persembahan. Saiz fon grafik. Saiz fon sesuai Bahan yang tidak
persembahan. Fon sesuai untuk membaca. untuk membaca. penting diserlahkan.
pada visual cukup Maklumat yang sesuai Pendengar mungkin
besar untuk dilihat disertakan. keliru. Jumlah teks
oleh semua orang. terlalu besar untuk
Maklumat disusun ruang yang
untuk disediakan. Terdapat
memaksimumkan sedikit penggunaan
pemahaman khalayak. grafik atau kesan.

19/20
 Butiran diminimumkan
supaya perkara utama
menonjol.

2 3 Overall 0.5 Learner is able to Learner uses more time Learner uses less The presentation is Poor overall 2
presentation present within the to present their output. time to present their too short, only presentation
quality time frame given. output. within 5 minutes. quality

Kualiti Pelajar dapat Pelajar menggunakan Pelajar Penyampaian terlalu Kualiti

persembahan membentangkan lebih banyak masa menggunakan lebih singkat, hanya dalam persembahan
keseluruhan dalam tempoh masa untuk membentangkan sedikit masa untuk masa 5 minit. keseluruhan
yang diberikan. hasil mereka. membentangkan yang lemah
hasil mereka.

2 3 Grammatical 0.5 Presentation slides Presentation slides Presentation slides Presentation slides Presentation 2
errors in have no or very less have few grammatical have several have numerous slides have lots
presentation grammatical error(s) errors (4-5 errors) grammatical errors (more than 7 errors). of grammatical
slides (1-2 errors) (6-7 errors). errors (10
errors).
Kesalahan
tatabahasa di Slaid pembentangan Slaid pembentangan Slaid pembentangan Slaid pembentangan Slaid
dalam slaid tidak mempunyai atau mempunyai kesalahan mempunyai mempunyai pembentangan
pembetangan mempunyai kesalahan tatabahasa yang sedikit beberapa kesalahan kesalahan tatabahasa mempunyai
tatabahasa yang (4-5 kesalahan). tatabahasa (6-7 yang agak banyak kesalahan
sangat minimal (1-2 kesalahan). (lebih dari 7 tatabahasa
kesalahan) kesalahan). yang sangat
banyak
(melebihi 10
kesalahan).

Total 5.0 20

*QN = Question Number

20/20
INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO SUBMIT PROOF OF ONLINE CLASS PARTICIPATION (10%)
Do the following:
1) Select the best FIVE (5) postings from the forum discussion set up by your tutor.
2) Do screenshots of the postings and include them as images in your assignment.
3) The screenshots should be in an image file (either in JPG or PNG format). Refer to the
sample of Screen Grab below
4) The screenshots should contain: Name, Title of the discussion, Day, Date and Time.

ARAHAN BAGI TATACARA PENGHANTARAN SEBAGAI BUKTI AKTIVITI ONLINE CLASS

PARTICIPATION (10%)

Laksanakan perkara berikut:

1) Pilih LIMA (5) postings terbaik dari perbincangan dalam talian yang telah disediakan
oleh tutor anda.
2) Laksanakan screen shot posting dan isikan dalam tugasan anda sebagai file imej.
3) Imej screen shot mesti dalam format imej (sama ada JPG atau PNG). Rujuk pada
contoh screen shot di bawah.
4) Screen shot mesti mengandungi: Nama, Tajuk Perbincangan, Hari, Tarikh dan Masa.

21/20
 PART II: ONLINE CLASS PARTICIPATION (10%)

Excellent Good Fair Poor Unsatisfactory Max

QN CLO Criteria Weightage 4 3 2 1 0 marks

Quality of All five comments Four of the Two or three of the One post submitted. OR All Postings done past
Postings are good, comments are good, comments are posts done in one day. assignment
appropriate, appropriate, somewhat good, OR None of the comments timeline.
relevant, meaningful, relevant, meaningful, appropriate, are good and relevant. OR No postings
and respectful. and respectful. meaningful and OR Comments are short given as proof of
Postings reflect Postings reflect respectful. responses that are not participation in
active participation participation within Postings show substantial nor meaningful. discussion.
within assignment assignment timeline. relatively short Minimum effort (e.g. “I agree
timeline. participation time. with Tina”).

1 3 2.5 10
Kualiti Kelima-lima komen Empat Dua atau tiga komen Satu penghantaran Postings melepasi
Postings baik, sesuai, relevan, komen baik, sesuai, baik, sesuai, ATAU Semua penghantaran tempoh tugasan.
bermakna dan relevan, bermakna relevan,bermakna dan dibuat dalam satu hari . ATAU ATAU Tiada
berhemah. dan berhemah. berhemah Tiada komen yang baik dan Postings diberi
Postings Postings Postings menunjukkan relevan. ATAU Komen hanya sebagai bukti
mencerminkan mencerminkan penyertaan dalam respon yang ringkas dan tidak penyertaan dalam
penyertaan aktif penyertaan jangakamasa yang meluas dan tidak perbincangan
sepanjang tempoh sepanjang tempoh singkat. bermakna.Usaha minimum
tugasan. tugasan. (Cth: “Saya bersetuju dengan
Tina”)

Total Marks/
2.5 10
Jumlah Markah

*QN = Question Number

22/20