The social issues that contribute to the preterm labor in the United Kingdom

Preterm and premature both refer to early. Preterm labor is defined as labor that starts prior to the

37th week of pregnancy. A woman’s body experiences labor when her baby is born. Premature

birth can be caused by preterm labor. When the baby gets born early, before 37 weeks of the

pregnancy, it is known as a premature birth. For optimal growth and development, the baby

needs to spend about forty weeks in the mother's womb before being born. Babies born

prematurely may experience severe health issues both during infancy and in the future Preterm

infants are those that are born alive before the full 37 weeks of pregnancy. Preterm birth can be

divided into many groups according to gestational age: extremely preterm (before 28 weeks),

very preterm (28 to fewer than 32 weeks) and mild to late preterm period (32–37 weeks)

(Delnord et al., 2019).

In 2020, approximately 13.4 million infants were delivered prematurely. That is greater than one

baby out of ten. 2019 has seen almost 900, 000 children lose their lives due to complications

from premature birth. A lifetime of difficulties, including as vision and hearing impairments and

learning disorders, await many survivors. Prematurity is the primary cause of mortality for

children below the age of five worldwide. There are significant disparities in survival rates

among countries. In low-income settings, the absence of practical, affordable care—such as

warmth, breastfeeding assistance, and basic treatment for infections and respiratory difficulties—

causes the death of half of babies delivered at or below 32 weeks, or two months early. In

wealthy nations, nearly all of these infants make it through. Preterm newborns that endure the

neonatal period have an increased risk of impairment due to poor utilization of technology in

middle-class settings (Dadi et al., 2020).

1
Premature newborns have lower levels of development than babies delivered at term. What

developmental stage they have reached can be inferred from their gestational age. This ultimately

relates to the kind of medical care they will require. A hospital's neonatal intensive care

unit (NICU) or special care nursery (for newborns who are a bit healthier compared to those

requiring intensive care) often contain the medical staff and supplies needed to care for preterm

babies. The breathing, heart rate, nutrition, temperature, and stomach and bowel functions of

newborns are all supported and monitored by equipment in the NICU. Being aware of the

warning signals is necessary to prevent preterm labor. It can be quite beneficial to act quickly.

The signs of preterm labor include the following symptoms: (a) A backache, most commonly in

the lower back. Even if you shift postures or take other comfort measures, this won't go away; it

could be continuous or occasional. (b) Faster and more intense contractions that occur at least

once every ten minutes. (c) Lower abdominal pains or cramps similar to menstruation. These

might feel like diarrhea-related gas pains. (d) Fluid coming out of the vagina. (e) Flu-like

symptoms, such as diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting. (f) Elevated pressure in the vagina or pelvis.

(g) A rise in the discharge from the vagina. (h) Vaginal hemorrhage, including minor bleeding

(Cormack et al., 2019) (Quenby et al., 2021).

Many times, it's unclear what specifically causes preterm birth. However, several factors may

increase the risk. Among the risk factors related to both preceding and present pregnancies are:

(a) Pregnancy involving multiples, such as twins or triplets. (b) Intervals between pregnancies of

fewer than six months. A gap of 18 to 24 months is optimal between pregnancies. (c) Treatments

known as assisted reproduction, such as in vitro fertilization that help you become pregnant. (d)

Several abortions or miscarriages. (e) A preterm birth in the past. Premature delivery is more

likely in cases of certain health issues, such as: (a) Issues pertaining to the placenta, cervix, or

2
uterus. (b) A few infections, primarily affecting the lower genital tract and amniotic fluid. (c)

Persistent health issues including diabetes and high blood pressure. (d) Trauma or injuries to the

body (Quenby et al., 2021).

A preterm pregnancy can also be increased by certain lifestyle choices, such as: (a) Smoking

cigarettes, abusing illegal substances, or consuming large amounts of alcohol when expecting.

(b) Being overweight or underweight before to becoming pregnant. (c) Becoming pregnant after

35 years old or prior to the age of 17. (d) Going through trying times in life, such a loved one

passing away or experiencing domestic abuse (Delnord et al., 2019).

Smoking has been proven to be a significant risk factor for premature delivery, which can

have negative effects on both moms and babies. With consideration to pertinent epidemiological,

biological, and socioeconomic factors, the goal of this article is to present a thorough

examination of the relationship between smoking and premature labor in the United Kingdom.

Preterm labor and smoking are strongly associated, according to epidemiological research. In the

UK, despite widespread public health initiatives, a significant percentage of expectant mothers

smoke. About 10% of pregnant women in the UK smoke throughout their pregnancy, in

accordance to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Regional

differences in this frequency are evident, with larger rates found in areas with lower

socioeconomic status. A pregnant woman's risk of premature labor increases with the number of

cigarettes she smokes, as there is a dose-dependent relationship among smoking and preterm

delivery. Secondhand smoke, which is commonly referred to as passive smoking exposure,

increases this risk even more. Unknowingly contributing to unfavorable pregnancy outcomes

might be spouses or family members that smoke (Smith et al., 2019).

3
 Developing successful therapies requires an understanding of the molecular pathways

through which smoking effects premature labor. The main addictive ingredient in tobacco,

nicotine, narrows blood vessels and lowers the flow of blood to the uterus, depriving the growing

fetus of oxygen and nutrients. One of the main contributing factors to the start of premature labor

is this impaired uteroplacental circulation. Furthermore, smoking causes oxidative stress and

systemic inflammation, each of which have been linked to the pathophysiology of premature

delivery. The delicate equilibrium between pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines is upset by

inflammatory processes, which may lead to early uterine spasms and cervical abnormalities

(Brooks et al., 2020).

The relationship between smoking and premature labor is significantly influenced by

social variables, such as socioeconomic level. Smoking is more common among pregnant

women coming from lower socioeconomic backgrounds, which is consistent with larger trends

of health disparity. These women may experience difficulties including poor nutrition, elevated

stress levels, and restricted access to healthcare, all of which raise the risk of premature delivery.

Smoking's effects on preterm labor are frequently entwined with additional risk factors that are

common in underprivileged communities, such exposure to environmental toxins, insufficient

prenatal care, and subpar nutrition. Creating comprehensive initiatives to lower the UK's preterm

birth rate requires addressing these complex issues (Amjad et al., 2019).

In the UK, efforts have been made to reduce the incidence of smoking during the

pregnancy and, as a result, premature labor. Programs for antenatal care include a strong

emphasis on medication, behavioral support, counseling, and other smoking cessation strategies.

Personalized methods, cultural awareness, and accessibility are necessary for these initiatives to

be successful. Campaigns for public health, including the "Smoke free" project, have increased

4
knowledge of the dangers of smoking while pregnant. These initiatives recognize the need of a

supportive atmosphere for effective smoking cessation and target not just pregnant women as

well as their partners and family. In the UK, there are still obstacles standing in the way of

meaningfully lowering the rates of smoking during pregnancy and the consequently high rates of

premature births. A diversified strategy is needed to address the intricate interactions between

biological, socioeconomic, and psychological factors. A comprehensive plan must address

underlying social factors, improve access to tools for quitting smoking, and strengthen

community-based treatments (Cormack et al., 2019).

The possible negative effects of alcohol intake on the health of both the mother and the

fetus have drawn attention to the influence of drinking alcohol on premature delivery in the

United Kingdom. In order to better understand the relationship between alcohol misuse and

preterm delivery in the UK, this article will examine epidemiological patterns, biological

processes, and public health consequences. Even if alcohol use in the United Kingdom has

decreased generally in the past few years, a sizable segment of the populace still engages in risky

drinking habits. In 2020, 20% of individuals reported drinking at amounts that would potentially

be harmful to their health, according to a poll conducted by the Bureau for National Statistics

(ONS). The discussion of premature labor should take into account the prevalence of alcohol

intake, as it has been found that maternal alcohol abuse is a controllable risk factor. Alcohol use

and preterm birth are regularly linked in a dose-dependent manner, according to epidemiological

research. The more and more often a pregnant woman drinks alcohol, the higher the danger.

Different socioeconomic and demographic characteristics influence the prevalence of alcohol

consumption during pregnancy; women with less schooling and those who are socially

5
disadvantaged tend to have greater rates of consuming alcohol during pregnancy (Delnord et al.,

2019).

For intervention measures to be effective, it is essential to comprehend the biological factors

underlying the link between alcohol addiction and premature labor. Alcohol is easily absorbed by

the placenta and can have harmful consequences on the growing fetus. Fetal alcohol spectrum

disorders (FASD) are a group of disorders that can arise from exposure to alcohol during

pregnancy. Even moderate alcohol consumption can have subtle but significant effects, such as

an increased chance of preterm delivery, even though severe instances of FASD are typified by

both physical and cognitive abnormalities. Alcohol impacts organ development, interferes with

cellular processes, and weakens the placenta, all of which are detrimental to proper embryonic

development. Preterm labor can result from any disturbance in the placenta's function, which is

crucial for maintaining the developing fetus. Furthermore, early uterine spasms and cervical

abnormalities may result in alcohol-induced inflammation plus oxidative stress, which might

eventually cause preterm delivery. Socioeconomic issues are frequently linked to the correlation

between alcohol misuse and premature labor. Harmful drinking practices during pregnancy may

be more common among women who experience financial difficulties, have restricted

availability of healthcare, and have little social support. In order to reduce the prevalence of

preterm births in disadvantaged communities, specific treatments that address the socioeconomic

drivers of alcohol consumption must be developed (Cormack et al., 2019).

The relevance of managing alcohol use during pregnancy is acknowledged by UK

antenatal care programs. Medical professionals often check for alcohol usage in expectant

mothers and warn them about the possible hazards to the developing fetus. However, cultural

sensitivity, accessibility to healthcare services, and the development of a trustworthy patient-

6
provider relationship are all necessary for these treatments to be effective. Raising awareness of

the dangers of maternal alcohol intake is largely accomplished through public health efforts, such

as those that support alcohol-free pregnancies. The "Drink Free Days" initiative, which has the

support of the United Kingdom's Chief Medical Officers, promotes a healthy lifestyle, especially

for expectant mothers, by encouraging people to skip alcohol for a few days each week.

Effectively managing alcohol-related preterm labor still presents hurdles despite continuous

efforts. Reaching and involving high-risk individuals is challenging because to the stigma

associated with alcohol consumption during pregnancy, a lack of knowledge, and the intricate

interaction of social variables. Improved availability of mental health services, community-based

initiatives, and tailored assistance for vulnerable persons are all necessary components of a

complete approach aimed at maximizing the impact of treatments (Brooks et al., 2020).

Preterm birth and other unfavorable pregnancy outcomes have been linked to substance

usage, which includes using illegal substances and prescription pharmaceuticals for purposes

other than medical ones. Through the integration of biological processes, socio-economic factors,

and epidemiological trends, this article seeks to give a thorough study of the relationship

between drug addiction and premature labor in the UK. To appreciate the extent of the problem

in the UK, one must grasp the epidemiological context of drug abuse during pregnancy. The use

of illegal substances such as heroin, cocaine, and cannabis, in addition to the non-medical

consumption of prescription pharmaceuticals, especially benzodiazepines and opioids, are

examples of substance abuse. The UK has a concerning high incidence of drug abuse among

pregnant women, according to epidemiological research, with rates that vary according to

demographic, socioeconomic, and geographic characteristics. Around 5% of pregnant women in

the UK acknowledge using illegal drugs during their pregnancy, while non-medical use of

7
prescription pharmaceuticals is also a known risk, in accordance with data gathered by the

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (Cormack et al., 2019).

Misuse of substances during the pregnancy can have a direct biological influence on the

health of the mother and the fetus. Prescription medicines and illicit substances can easily pass

the placenta and expose the growing baby to their pharmacological impacts. Different chemicals

have varying impacts on a developing fetus. Stimulant substances such as cocaine and

methamphetamines, for instance, have the ability to narrow blood vessels, which may hinder

blood circulation to the uterus and could result in placental abruption, a dangerous consequence

linked to premature delivery. Contrarily, opioid usage can lead to low birth weight and neonatal

abstinence syndrome (NAS), both of which are risk factors for premature delivery. Substance

abuse has an effect that goes beyond its immediate physiological consequences. Preterm labor

risk is further raised by the co-occurrence of drug use with unhealthy habits, insufficient prenatal

care, and an elevated risk of infectious infections. While research on the effects of marijuana

usage during pregnancy is still underway, several studies indicate to a possible connection

among marijuana use and premature birth. The psychotropic ingredient in marijuana,

Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), has the ability to pass through the placenta and impact the growing

fetus. Preterm labor may result from marijuana use's disturbance of the endocannabinoid system,

which is essential for sustaining pregnancy. Additionally, the burning of marijuana releases

poisons such as carbon monoxide, which might hinder the fetus's ability to get oxygen.

Complications including restricted intrauterine growth and premature delivery might result from

this oxygen shortage (Dadi et al., 2020).

Socioeconomic issues are intricately linked to substance abuse and its correlation with

premature labor. People who are unemployed, in difficult financial situations, or who reside in

8
impoverished neighborhoods may be more likely to abuse drugs. These socioeconomic problems

add to a complicated network of risk factors that raise the possibility of preterm delivery, such as

inadequate nutrition, mental health conditions, and restricted access to treatment. Furthermore,

people may be discouraged from getting appropriate prenatal care and assistance due to the

stigma associated with substance usage. Missed chances for intervention and delayed risk factor

identification may arise from this lack of interaction with healthcare professionals. In the UK,

efforts to reduce drug abuse and its connection to premature labor entail a multifaceted strategy.

Antenatal care programs place a strong emphasis on routine screening for drug abuse, which

enables medical professionals to recognize and assist expectant patients who are battling with

addiction. To reduce the dangers related to drug abuse during pregnancy, early intervention by

means of counseling, addiction rehabilitation programs, as well as harm reduction techniques is

essential. Initiatives pertaining to public health are essential in increasing consciousness and

diminishing the shame associated with substance abuse. Efforts to increase knowledge,

compassion, and availability of resources for pregnant women with drug abuse problems are

being made through educational campaigns aimed at both the general public and healthcare

professionals (Brooks et al., 2020) (Delnord et al., 2019).

Premature labor and substance abuse during pregnancy are complicated issues that call

for continuous care and focused solutions. The socioeconomic factors of drug usage, stigma, and

a lack of access towards addiction treatment programs all contribute to the ongoing nature of this

problem. Addiction experts, social services, community groups, and healthcare practitioners

must work together to develop a comprehensive strategy to address drug abuse in the setting of

premature labor. To minimize the occurrence of preterm birth linked to substance usage in the

UK, a comprehensive approach must include strengthening support networks, increasing

9
availability of addiction treatment, and advocating harm reduction techniques (Quenby et al.,

2021).

Even while improvements in healthcare have led to better outcomes for mothers and

newborns, socioeconomic differences continue to be important factors that affect how a

pregnancy turns out. By examining the complex interactions between social, medical, and

economic issues, we aim to shed light on the ways that low socioeconomic status women in the

UK contribute to premature labor. Moreover, we will also look at the potential impact that poor

educational attainment may have in this phenomena. In order to design targeted treatments and

promote equitable maternal outcomes, it is imperative to examine the complex relationships

between educational gaps and premature labor. Low socioeconomic position is frequently linked

to financial limitations which impact one's ability to get healthcare. Delayed commencement of

prenatal treatment is a significant problem among lower-income mothers. Healthcare

professionals have fewer opportunity to recognize and address risk factors that might lead to

premature labor when patients enter treatment later in life. Furthermore, the likelihood of

unfavorable outcomes may increase if access to necessary prenatal examinations and therapies is

restricted due to financial constraints (Cormack et al., 2019).

A lack of financial means can also lead to substandard housing and poor nutrition, which

are both associated with a higher risk of premature labor. It is critical to address economic

inequality and improve poor groups' ability to access healthcare services in order to reduce these

risk factors. Poorer educational attainment is frequently linked to poorer socioeconomic position,

which exacerbates health literacy gaps. Low-income women may find it more difficult to make

educated decisions about pregnancy if they have inadequate knowledge about the significance of

prenatal treatment, healthy lifestyle options, and identifying possible risk factors. It is important

10
to provide educational interventions aimed at low-income areas in order to close the knowledge

gap and provide women with the necessary information to ensure the best possible pregnancy

outcomes. In order to address health literacy issues, healthcare practitioners must give clear,

understandable information and create an atmosphere that encourages candid dialogue (Dadi et

al., 2020).

Women from low-income backgrounds typically work in professions that require a lot of

mental and physical strain. Preterm labor can be increased by physically hard employment,

prolonged hours at work, and encounters with workplace dangers. When employment security is

insecure, women could feel pressured to work in hazardous environments when expecting a

child. Advocating for regulations that prioritize maternal health in the workplace, guaranteeing a

right to maternity leave, and offering accommodations for pregnant staff members are some of

the steps taken to address work-related variables that contribute to premature labor. Pregnant

women can work in safer conditions thanks in large part to occupational health initiatives (Smith

et al., 2019).

Psychosocial distress among low-income women is mostly influenced by socioeconomic

obstacles, such as housing instability, interpersonal disputes, as well as exposure to

neighborhood violence. Stress hormones that might affect the course of a pregnancy are released

when the body's stress response system is triggered by prolonged stress. Preterm birth risk is

associated with mental health difficulties, which are more common in lower socioeconomic

groups. Untreated depression and anxiety can lead to unfavorable pregnancy outcomes. It is

essential to incorporate mental health assistance into community initiatives and prenatal care in

order to alleviate psychosocial stresses and enhance overall health. Due to budgetary limitations,

low-income women may have trouble getting access to wholesome food. There is evidence that

11
insufficient nutrition during pregnancy increases the risk of premature labor. Inadequate

availability of fresh produce, fruits, and other vital nutrients might affect fetal development and

cause problems for the health of mothers. Community-based programs that offer financial

assistance for nutritious food and information on cost-effective healthy eating can help tackle

these issues and assist low-income pregnant women in consuming a balanced diet. The

integration of nutritional assistance into the larger context of maternity care necessitates

collaborations between healthcare practitioners and community groups (Delnord et al., 2019).

Women with lower levels of education may have trouble identifying and controlling the

risk factors linked to premature childbirth. This covers lifestyle choices such drug and alcohol

misuse, smoking, and inadequate eating. An elevated incidence of premature labor in this

population may result from delayed identification and treatment of these risk factors.

Community-based initiatives with an emphasis on early risk detection and management may be

very helpful, particularly for groups with lower levels of knowledge. To guarantee prompt

intervention and assistance, these programs should place a high priority on easily accessible

information, outreach programs, and partnerships with nearby healthcare practitioners. There

exists a strong correlation between lifestyle choices and educational attainment. Individuals with

lower levels of education are more likely to participate in activities that raise the risk of

premature labor. This includes abusing drugs or alcohol, smoking, and not knowing how these

habits affect the course of pregnancy. Preterm labor risk can be effectively decreased in groups

with lower educational attainment by implementing targeted treatments that emphasize healthy

lifestyle decisions and offer assistance for quitting unhealthy habits. Programs rooted in the

community and educational initiatives ought to tackle the unique requirements and obstacles

encountered by these people (Cormack et al., 2019).

12
 In conclusion, a number of variables, such as smoking, alcoholism, substance abuse, low

socioeconomic status, and low educational attainment, all contribute to the risk of premature

labor in the UK. Through complex biological mechanisms and socioeconomic backgrounds,

several factors lead to premature labor. It is crucial to understand the intricate interactions

between these components in order to fully address and reduce these risks. Holistic methods

including healthcare professionals, legislators, educators, and community groups should be

implemented. One major risk factor for preterm birth in the UK is smoking. In addition to being

biological, the impact is also impacted by socioeconomic variables. It is essential to comprehend

this relationship in order to develop interventions and strategies for public health that are

effective. The UK can significantly lower the risk of preterm births and improve the health of

expectant mothers and newborns by implementing a comprehensive strategy to combat smoking

during pregnancy. In the UK, drug addiction and alcoholism can have a major impact on

premature labor. A comprehensive approach is required to lower the incidence of preterm birth

linked to mother alcohol intake and drug abuse since both biological and socioeconomic

variables are involved. The UK will be able to make major progress in encouraging healthier

pregnancies and enhancing mother and newborn outcomes if these challenges are fully addressed

(Smith et al., 2019).

Low socioeconomic income also presents a risk for premature labor, with issues related

to the economy, society, and healthcare. The risk is increased by a number of factors, including

unequal accessibility to healthcare, educational and economic inequities, work-related pressures,

psychological stress, and dietary challenges. Reducing these gaps requires a multifaceted

strategy including community organizations, legislators, educators, and healthcare professionals.

The main areas of concentration should be on resolving financial difficulties, improving

13
healthcare access, offering educational interventions, making workplaces safer, managing

psychological stresses, and guaranteeing that people have access to a healthy diet. In order to

create a more equal healthcare system within the UK, it is imperative that the socio-economic

factors of premature labor are acknowledged and addressed. This strategy attempts to enhance

maternal and newborn outcomes and lessen the impact of preterm delivery for all women,

regardless of socioeconomic background. In the UK, there is also a correlation between the risk

of premature labor and poor educational attainment. The significance of comprehending these

relationships is highlighted by a complex interaction of factors, such as low health literacy,

delayed identification of risk factors, socioeconomic inequities, obstacles to accessing

healthcare, and unhealthy lifestyle choices. Increasing access to resources and services, lowering

socioeconomic gaps, encouraging healthy lifestyle choices, and raising health literacy are all part

of a focused strategy. Through tackling these variables, the United Kingdom may endeavor to

establish a healthcare system that is more equitable, therefore enhancing maternal and delivery

outcomes for women of all educational backgrounds (Amjad et al., 2019).

Hence, a thorough and integrated strategy is necessary due to the complex nature of

preterm birth risk in the UK. The necessity for initiatives that take into account both biological

mechanisms plus socio-economic determinants is highlighted by the interrelated impacts of

smoking, consumption of alcohol, drug usage, poor socio-economic income, as well as low

educational levels. The United Kingdom has the potential to significantly lower the rate of

preterm labor and improve the health of mothers and newborns by tackling these causes together,

integrating many stakeholders, and putting focused measures into place. Improving the well-

being of pregnant women along with their newborns in the UK requires the creation of a more

14
equitable healthcare system that takes socioeconomic factors and educational differences into

account (Quenby et al., 2021) (Brooks et al., 2020) (Smith et al., 2019).

References

Amjad, S., MacDonald, I., Chambers, T., Osornio‐Vargas, A., Chandra, S., Voaklander, D. and

Ospina, M.B., 2019. Social determinants of health and adverse maternal and birth

outcomes in adolescent pregnancies: a systematic review and meta ‐analysis. Paediatric

and perinatal epidemiology, 33(1), pp.88-99.

Berghella, V. and Saccone, G., 2019. Fetal fibronectin testing for reducing the risk of preterm

birth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (7).

Brooks, S.K., Weston, D. and Greenberg, N., 2020. Psychological impact of infectious disease

outbreaks on pregnant women: rapid evidence review. Public health, 189, pp.26-36.

Chersich, M.F., Pham, M.D., Areal, A., Haghighi, M.M., Manyuchi, A., Swift, C.P., Wernecke,

B., Robinson, M., Hetem, R., Boeckmann, M. and Hajat, S., 2020. Associations between

high temperatures in pregnancy and risk of preterm birth, low birth weight, and

stillbirths: systematic review and meta-analysis. bmj, 371.

Cormack, B.E., Harding, J.E., Miller, S.P. and Bloomfield, F.H., 2019. The influence of early

nutrition on brain growth and neurodevelopment in extremely preterm babies: a narrative

review. Nutrients, 11(9), p.2029.

15
Dadi, A.F., Miller, E.R., Bisetegn, T.A. and Mwanri, L., 2020. Global burden of antenatal

depression and its association with adverse birth outcomes: an umbrella review. BMC

public health, 20, pp.1-16.

Delnord, M. and Zeitlin, J., 2019, February. Epidemiology of late preterm and early term births–

An international perspective. In Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine (Vol. 24, No.

1, pp. 3-10). WB Saunders.

Elovitz, M.A., Gajer, P., Riis, V., Brown, A.G., Humphrys, M.S., Holm, J.B. and Ravel, J., 2019.

Cervicovaginal microbiota and local immune response modulate the risk of spontaneous

preterm delivery. Nature communications, 10(1), p.1305.

Fekadu Dadi, A., Miller, E.R. and Mwanri, L., 2020. Antenatal depression and its association

with adverse birth outcomes in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review

and meta-analysis. PloS one, 15(1), p.e0227323.

Gale, C., Quigley, M.A., Placzek, A., Knight, M., Ladhani, S., Draper, E.S., Sharkey, D.,

Doherty, C., Mactier, H. and Kurinczuk, J.J., 2021. Characteristics and outcomes of

neonatal SARS-CoV-2 infection in the UK: a prospective national cohort study using

active surveillance. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 5(2), pp.113-121.

Knight, M., Bunch, K., Vousden, N., Morris, E., Simpson, N., Gale, C., O’Brien, P., Quigley,

M., Brocklehurst, P. and Kurinczuk, J.J., 2020. Characteristics and outcomes of pregnant

women admitted to hospital with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in UK: national

population based cohort study. bmj, 369.

16
Kotlar, B., Gerson, E., Petrillo, S., Langer, A. and Tiemeier, H., 2021. The impact of the

COVID-19 pandemic on maternal and perinatal health: a scoping review. Reproductive

health, 18, pp.1-39.

Kulkarni, A., Squire, G., Hogrefe, K. and Waseem Osman, M., 2021. Peripartum

cardiomyopathy. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist, 23(4), pp.278-289.

Matthews, T., Danese, A., Caspi, A., Fisher, H.L., Goldman-Mellor, S., Kepa, A., Moffitt, T.E.,

Odgers, C.L. and Arseneault, L., 2019. Lonely young adults in modern Britain: findings

from an epidemiological cohort study. Psychological medicine, 49(2), pp.268-277.

Mullins, E., Hudak, M.L., Banerjee, J., Getzlaff, T., Townson, J., Barnette, K., Playle, R., Perry,

A., Bourne, T., Lees, C.C. and PAN‐COVID investigators and the National Perinatal

COVID‐19 Registry Study Group, 2021. Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of COVID ‐

19: coreporting of common outcomes from PAN‐COVID and AAP‐SONPM registries.

Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 57(4), pp.573-581.

Quenby, S., Gallos, I.D., Dhillon-Smith, R.K., Podesek, M., Stephenson, M.D., Fisher, J.,

Brosens, J.J., Brewin, J., Ramhorst, R., Lucas, E.S. and McCoy, R.C., 2021. Miscarriage

matters: the epidemiological, physical, psychological, and economic costs of early

pregnancy loss. The Lancet, 397(10285), pp.1658-1667.

Smaill, F.M. and Vazquez, J.C., 2019. Antibiotics for asymptomatic bacteriuria in

pregnancy. Cochrane database of systematic reviews, (11).

Smith, G.D., Blane, D. and Bartley, M.E.L., 2019. Explanations for socio—economic

differentials in mortality: Evidence from Britain and elsewhere. In Management of

Healthcare (pp. 49-62). Routledge.

17
Thébaud, B., Goss, K.N., Laughon, M., Whitsett, J.A., Abman, S.H., Steinhorn, R.H., Aschner,

J.L., Davis, P.G., McGrath-Morrow, S.A., Soll, R.F. and Jobe, A.H., 2019.

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Nature reviews Disease primers, 5(1), p.78.

18