First of all, I will think of such a dilemma: If something goes wrong in my house, I may lose all

my favorite things, but if I have a chance to pick one of my most precious items from the inside,
what will it be? Why is this particular item so important? I think this is a difficult question to
answer because the things at home are the most familiar and most needed things in our life, so I
think it is difficult to choose one from so many things.

In the face of such a heartbreaking situation, our instinctive desire to save what we cherish shows
the depth of our emotional attachment. For me, I may not choose something that is very valuable,
but I will choose something that has memories. Like my junior high school diary. Probably in
terms of value, it's not worth much, because it's a very ordinary book. But it is also unique and
cannot be obtained with money or anything. The book is filled with my previous memories and
stories of what happened between me and my friends, hiding countless thoughts and experiences
that have shaped the core of who I am.

This diary is not just a collection of words on paper; It is a record of my life's journey. The
importance of this diary is that it takes me back to moments that I might otherwise forget. For
example, when I was in junior high school, I learned tennis with some good friends. The learning
pressure of junior high school is not small, and it is the last year of junior high school, we are
about to face the first big exam in this life. The study of tennis is usually after we finish the course
of the day, we run on the playground to release the pressure, or enjoy the happiness of tennis
together. That time was also very tiring because it was a huge test of our physical strength, there
were sweat and tears on the playground, but we encouraged each other to continue, and it did not
make that time very difficult. During the training, we would write a diary every day and record the
interesting things in the day. We would also pick up a leaf on the ground and stick it on the diary at
the end of the training. Generally speaking, the memories of that time were interesting and happy.
My close friends and I saw less and less of each other after junior high school because we chose
different paths, so that memory was precious to each of us because it could not be replicated again.
More than financially valuable, the diary became my lifeline, preserving intangible but priceless
aspects of my life.

In a broader context, this situation leads us to think about the nature of property. Often, we are
surrounded by material objects of sentimental value, but it takes a crisis to reveal what really
defines our sense of self. The hypothetical act of saving an object forces us to confront the most
important nature of life.

Our answers may remain valuable until we are confronted with a real choice because we have not
yet left these objects of our history. But once the choice is really in front of us, I think most people
don't choose ordinary values, and choose this recall value. Because we know that money can be
acquired later in life, but if some of the things that record memories disappear, we lose a large part
of the emotional value. It reminds us that our most cherished possessions are not just objects, but
containers of memories, emotions, and self-discovery.

My opinion is against this decision. Insurance companies can't treat people who die from
vaccines as suicides and won't cover the original family compensation.

First of all, although people have the right to choose whether to get vaccinated or not,
people also want to get vaccinated because they need to protect against the effects of
viruses or influenza. Vaccines are often used by society in the face of serious diseases or
dangerous viruses, so people who choose not to be vaccinated also have a chance of
dying. Although before vaccination, health care workers or experts will mention the side
effects of the vaccine or it also has the risk of death, but this is not a probability event,
more often people are vaccinated to protect themselves from the virus.

Second, people who want to get vaccinated do not want to commit suicide in the first
place, and death from vaccination is an accident, and insurance companies cannot view
this as a way for people to commit suicide. If a person wants to commit suicide, he will
not choose this way, because the probability of dying in this way is not high. This matter
counts as accidental death but not suicide. For example, when people travel, there is a
risk of death due to traffic accidents, so when people die in traffic accidents, does this
act count as suicide?

This decision is unfair because the death caused by a small probability cannot be
counted as an act of suicide.