The document outlines key questions an interviewer should address before conducting an oral history interview to ensure informed consent and clear communication of the project's goals and risks. Specifically, it states that the interviewer should obtain documented consent, clarify the project's goals and any risks of participation, and provide an opportunity for the narrator to review and approve the final interview. It also notes the importance of preliminary research on the topic to fully understand the narrator's perspective.
The document outlines key questions an interviewer should address before conducting an oral history interview to ensure informed consent and clear communication of the project's goals and risks. Specifically, it states that the interviewer should obtain documented consent, clarify the project's goals and any risks of participation, and provide an opportunity for the narrator to review and approve the final interview. It also notes the importance of preliminary research on the topic to fully understand the narrator's perspective.
The document outlines key questions an interviewer should address before conducting an oral history interview to ensure informed consent and clear communication of the project's goals and risks. Specifically, it states that the interviewer should obtain documented consent, clarify the project's goals and any risks of participation, and provide an opportunity for the narrator to review and approve the final interview. It also notes the importance of preliminary research on the topic to fully understand the narrator's perspective.
IS THERE CLEAR INFORMED CONSENT? Prior to the beginning of an
interview, the interviewer should clearly obtain and document the narrator’s agreement to participate in the process and the project. ARE THE GOALS OF THE PROJECT CLEAR? The interviewer should clearly communicate the goals of the project, any potential risks in participation that exist, and the understanding that once accessible, oral history can be used countless ways by any number of unknown people. This may occur within the interview itself, or with supporting documentation. DID THE INTERVIEWER PROVIDE THE NARRATOR WITH THE OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW AND APPROVE THE INTERVIEW? Though not always immediately discernable from the interview itself, thorough research should include confirmation of this so that utilizing the oral history interview as a source can be done with the affirmation that the interview portrays the correct information that narrator wished to share. WAS PRELIMINARY RESEARCH ON THE TOPIC OF STUDY CONDUCTED? This element requires thoughtfulness by the consumer, in the form of consideration of whether the interviewer was conscious of all the information that contributed to the narrator’s words and complete story.
Information gathered from
the Oral History Association, Statement on Ethics oralhistory.org