Professional Documents
Culture Documents
• The requirement was put in place starting Fall 2021 for all A.A.
students and Fall 2022 for all A.S. students.
The Federalists:
• Favored a stronger central government
• Were united in their support for the Constitution
• Wrote a series of 85 essays known today as "The
Federalist Papers"
• Written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison,
and John Jay.
The Antifederalists:
• Favored strong state government and a weak
national government
• Favored a more decentralized federal government
• Were divided over possible alternatives to the
Constitution
The Fight for Ratification: Tyranny
U.S. Constitution
Strong Centralized Government
Compromise
• The Great Compromise – created the bicameral
legislature with one house based on population and
the other on equal representation.
Constitutional • The 3/5 Compromise – enslaved people were
counted as 3/5 a person for purposes
Philosophy of representation in the House of Represenatives.
Federalism
The Great Compromise
• Implied powers
• Also known as the necessary and proper clause or the elastic clause of
the Constitution
• Gives Congress the power to make all laws “necessary and proper” to
carry out enumerated powers
The Constitution: The Executive Branch
FEDERALISTS ANTIFEDERALISTS
Who were they? Property owners, creditors, merchants Small farmers, frontiersmen,
debtors, shopkeepers, some state
government officials
What did they believe? Believed that elites were most fit to Believed that government should be
govern; feared “excessive democracy” closer to the people; feared
concentration of power in hands of
the elites
What system of government did they Favored strong national government; Favored retention of power by state
favor? believed in “filtration” so that only governments and protection of
elites would obtain governmental individual rights
power
Who were their leaders? Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, Patrick Henry, George Mason,
George Washington Elbridge Gerry, George Clinton
The Fight for Ratification: Representation
The Antifederalists wanted representatives who shared the same financial
interests as those they represented.
They feared only the rich would be elected and that they would act
against everyone else’s interests.
Popular sovereignty
means that
Popular sovereignty democratic
means that the government is BY THE
Rousseau was an
people are the PEOPLE AND FOR THE
advocate for popular
ultimate source of the PEOPLE—for the
sovereignty.
authority of their benefit of the people,
government. not for the benefit of
those who govern in
their name.
U.S. Citizenship
• Mandatory Duties
• Obey the law
• Paying taxes
• Jury duty
• Registering with the Selective Service
• Only for males ages 18 to 25
• Voluntary Responsibilities
• Voting
• Staying informed
• Community involvement
• Tolerance
• Respecting the diversity of opinions,
religion, cultures and ethnic groups.
• Passing it on
The United States: A Constitutional Republic
Governor Ron DeSantis (R) Senator Rick Scott (R) Senator Marco Rubio (R)
Political Parties
Court Cases
Cases Regarding Powers of the Government
Marbury v Madison (1803) • Established the Court's power of judicial review
• The Court determined the Bill of Rights did not apply to the state governments, establishing a
Barron v. Baltimore (1833) precedent that lasted until the 14th amendment
Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857) • the Court held that US citizenship did not extend to people of African descent
• the Court held that military tribunals to try civilians when civil courts are operating is
Ex parte Milligan (1866) unconstitutional
• The Court ordered President Nixon to deliver tape recordings and subpoenaed materials to a
United States v. Nixon (1974) federal district court; executive privilege is not absolute. Rule of law applies to president.
• The different standards of courting votes in different counties violated the Equal Protection
Bush v. Gore (2000) clause.
District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) • The 2nd amendment allows for firearms in the home for lawful purpose of self defense
Cases Regarding the First Amendment
• the words used by Schenck created a "clear and present danger" and were not protected by the 1st
Schenck v. United States (1919) amendment
Near v. Minnesota (1931) • prior restraint in publications under the Minnesota law was a violation of the 1st amendment
West Virginia v. Barnette (1943) • first amendment freedom of speech protects students from being forced to salute the flag in school
• Unconstitutional for state officials to compose an official school prayer and encourage its recitation
Engel v. Vitale (1962) in public schools – violation of establishment clause
• a newspaper cannot be held liable for making false and defamatory statements about the conduct
New York Times v. Sullivan (1964) of an official unless those statements were made with malice
• a public school could not punish a student for peaceful protest if it did not interfere with school
Tinker v. Des Moines (1969) discipline
• school administrators could exercise prior restraint of school sponsored expression if its related to
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier (1988) legitimate concerns
Texas v. Johnson (1989) • burning the American flag is protected by the first amendment as it is symbolic speech
Citizens United v. Federal Election • the government cannot restrict independent expenditures for political campaigns from
Commission (2010) corporations, labor unions, and others
Cases Regarding Due Process
• Evidence obtained unconstitutionally cannot be used in court (fourth Amendment)
Mapp v. Ohio (1961) • Exclusionary rule applied to states.
Gideon v. Wainwright • states must provide attorneys to criminal defendants who are unable to afford their
own (sixth)
(1963)
Miranda v. Arizona • Prosecutors cannot use a person's statements in response to interrogation in police
custody unless they can prove that person has been informed of their rights
(1966) • Protection from self incrimination (fifth)
• Juveniles tried for crimes in delinquency proceedings are also protected under due
In re Gault (1967) process (fifth and sixth)
Cases Regarding Equal Protection
Regents of the
Plessy v. Ferguson Brown v. Board of Obergefell v. Hodges
University of California
(1896) Education (1954) (2015)
v. Bakke (1978)
• Relevant cases
Cases • Griswold v. Connecticut 1965 – married couples should be able
to access contraception without government
Regarding interference. Constitutional right to privacy.
• Roe v. Wade 1973 - a woman has liberty to choose to have an
Privacy Rights abortion; but this freedom is not absolute and must be balanced
against the health of the mother and fetus.
• Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health 2022 - the constitution does
not confer a right to an abortion. Roe v. Wade is overturned,
and abortion laws are now determined by the states.
• Privacy has also been invoked to protect rights for LGBTQ+
individuals.
Cases Regarding Federalism
Final Practice the Quizlet and Immigration test to see how good
your recall is. Try to do these without notes and all at once
Thoughts
to recreate the exam conditions as much as possible.
When you leave the exam – before doing anything else – find a quiet
spot to jot down notes about what you remember. If you do not pass
and need to do a retake, you will have an idea of what you need to
study.