Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Musical Times Publications Ltd. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to The Musical Times
t(' i uwilD i
t htaaah
....... . .... .. .. . yi
Xnh Fr .......... . to .'..i{.i. . ...it .itI...
aeta aa.aOa'~~
G -IFTED AR IS S JO
INUNIQEgRECITALt at att3.00 a t, wail
N............-----
ahetoRhth l.RCa'Ll.t ' e..... ......a.'
th}1#i o e, A Ye-1
M la akl'o,
wyM k eviola".n
a C, Wi;nt, ++
J'?.tI,
ithl
::++:++++++ ++i++; +ii++
,.,,R.N~i
a"dad a it u'a~-'aa
F it ARWtilii'wi t
hionlaatatatwaOn agia a a'8awiaaiial I'
o'iaay faa: lta hi:ltta[ a rto [o t [-aoo . Vataa. t'> a 1 h:h e]] It. Ill4 !i'taa: at.aaaadaaaaa.taal -gaita.it': tai tta}i:
'itt
? 5it:,!kteit
ilat.laa , a. a, igat
aatdtaatai'alaai . ..a ha ta .. :it
12. A brief review in trio heard last night, with all the emphasis of a Liszt tainted with sentimentality) and that women who
Vogue (15 April and carry on with the sturdiness of a John Ireland or strove to go beyond this limited sphere were unnat-
1918) first consid- Frank Bridge. ural (they were trying to be men, usurping a mascu-
ers Anthony Trent [London] Star line vocabulary that they could only possibly use in-
and Frank Bridge, authentically) and were condemned or at best treat-
mentioning Clarke The reviewer who remarks on Clarke's strength re- ed with curiosity. It is this curiosity - a polite, dis-
as a composer only
alises that this complement casts her femininity into tancing, patronising inquisitiveness - that permeates
as an afterthought:
'One should not, question. Thus the writer must qualify the remark - a 1926 review in the Musical Times of Clarke's Mid-
too, overlook Miss humorously, of course - to emphasise that if Clarke summer moon for violin and piano. Rather than con-
Clarke's own is unladylike in her creative efforts, at least she is sider the aesthetic value of this piece, the critic takes
picturesque compo- still within the bounds of propriety as far as her the opportunity to weigh the virtues of an abstracted
sitions, the 'Lullaby' physical attributes are concerned. 'new "woman-composer" ' against the 'old'.
and 'Grotesque' for
viola and cello.' The conservative turn of post-World War I Britain
has been memorably described in a recent book, The In reading Miss Rebecca Clarke's 'Midsummer
Moon' our first impression is one of relief and grati-
13. Cyrilla Barr female malady: women, madness and English culture,
presents a broad tude: for the new "woman-composer" is at least free
1830-1980, by Elaine Showalter, who notes 'the shift
perspective of from the cloying sentimentality of the old. ... May
of feminist interests away from questions of women's
Coolidge's influence nights and moonlight are no longer the source of
independence to questions of women's relationships
in 'A style of her gushing platitudes. The modern woman looks upon
own: reflections on with men.' She considers the emergence of what psy-
these things with the detachment of a scientist .
the patronage of choanalysts dubbed the 'masculinity complex',
She has an eye for the picturesque, but it is an eye
Elizabeth Sprague which saw feminists as women who sublimate their
undimmed by a rising tear. She is too keen, too de-
Coolidge', forth- desire to be men by 'following masculine pursuits of termined and too interested to be easily moved; her
coming in Cultivat- an intellectual and professional nature', and the in-ecstasy is of the mind rather than of the emotions.
ing music in Ameri-
fluence of Sigmund Freud, whose theories were re-This is all so much pure gain. At worst she can only
ca: women patrons
and activists since ceived enthusiastically in Britain.'1 This backlash toleave us cold; the others, when they really tried
1860, edited by first-wave feminism brought with it, then, the Victo- could be loathsome. With the instinct for change
Ralph P. Locke and rian double bind: that women who worked within and variety, with the flair for fashions which is wom-
Cyrilla Barr the acceptably feminine sphere were considered to an's own gift, she reaches the goal while the more
(Berkeley & Los cautious male hesitates and counts the cost. In the
be of little value (insignificant, in the lesser genres,
School at 4:30 to I go to sleep - I've got to have it in my mind all the I can understand Hitler when I see boys playing in
hear trios played by time and if one allows too many other things to take sand-box: 'It's mine' 'No, it's mine.' I fear war will al-
Mr and Mrs over one is liable not to be able to do it, that's been ways exist.
M[annes] and my experience.
Casals. Casals, who 69
played very badly So Clarke's impulse to compose was submerged but My fingers are puckered from all the washing I have
indeed last night, not gone. In 1939 came another accident - not a to do - self, children, bedding, dishes. Hard to play
played most happy one for Clarke or for anyone, but it did effec- well that way.
beautifully today. tively separate her from the distractions that kept
Sat with Friskin and
her from composing - World War II. 102
talked a lot with
As relatives tell the story, Clarke was visiting her Difficult to realise that the sun still shines in London
him, queer, shy
brothers in the US during the summer of 1939 when as much as it ever does.
thing that he is.
Nothing in the Britain declared war. Since London was being evacu-
152
evening.' ated, she decided to remain with her brothers and
their families. These years, 1939-42, were a remark- Unreal experiences seem quite natural while they
23. These letters are are present. But one sometimes thinks even at the
able compositional efflorescence, and Clarke's final
among the few that time: I shall not believe I have ever done this. We are
survive in Clarke's period of musical creativity. There was ultimately
friction in both families as the wives saw Rebecca as adaptable creatures.
estate. They remain
in the 'Tall Gals' attempting to usurp roles of leadership within the 172
shoe box (size 11) family, and she saw her brothers as taking on the
Letter from England - mirage-like effect switching
that she stored cruelty of their father. It was a very unhappy time for
them in. me away from this hour's failure.
Clarke, but unlike her unhappy involvement with
24. Clarke and John Goss, it was musically productive. In this way, 188
Friskin were with Clarke living within the confines of her family, I compose them [the children] to sleep
married on 23 there might be some parallels to the years when, as
September 1944 a teenager still cowering before her father, Clarke 214
(marriage certificate had first started to compose. Strange that an absent-minded moody musician
in Clarke's estate).
The ten pieces from this period include a broad should be doing this!
Joseph Clarke died
on 23 September range of styles - particularly striking is the Prelude,
1920, as document- allegro, and pastorale. Here the lyrical breadth and Clarke's chance meeting on a Manhattan street
ed in Rebecca's rich, developmental thematic treatment of her earli- with pianist James Friskin in early 1944 was de-
diary and er music is replaced by a tautness, contrapuntalscribed as 'rain in the desert'.20 They had been stu-
Stammtafeln der agility, crisp melodic style, and an energetic use ofdents together at the Royal College, with Friskin
Familie Ranke
asymmetrical rhythms that suggests comparison studying composition and piano. He had given up
(Cologne, 1976),
p.20. with the neo-classical Stravinsky. This piece was onecomposition on accepting a position at the Juilliard
of 35 works included in the 1942 meeting of the In-School.21 They had also known each other during
Clarke to Friskin:
N CO P h: .. ....... ......
Did I tell you,James, that I love you?! Do you know
that, more and more, I feel - just as you told me you
it1 )j,1 - A-4
did - that all my life has been a kind of preparation
for you?
4 . ...........
24 August 1944
Friskin to Clarke:
24 July IT,
Ai"iii:i U1.
iii:i'ii ii
Clarke does not respond to this directly (or at least iLt.i- iJ,
none survives). Instead, her letter of 20 August in-
cludes a traditionally feminine token of devotion:
'Will you someday let me knit something for you?' Artur Rubinstein summed up the
25. Letter opinion
from Ru- o
Surely some part of her conscious or unconscious the luminaries that she, before World War II, binstein to Clarke
mind was aware that her wedding took place on the worked with on a regular basis, when he called her(10 February 1966),
anniversary of her father's death.24 At last Clarke had 'The glorious Rebecca Clarke'!25 quoted by Christo-
pher Johnson in
found a man who gave her a sense of deep satisfac- By recognising that Clarke's identity as a composer
notes to the North-
tion and equilibrium. Clarke and Friskin were both clashed with her identity as a woman, I do not mean eastern recording of
58 when they married. Apart from one last song, and to portray Clarke as weak or as victimised but simplyClarke's viola music
some revisions of earlier works, Clarke would not to recognise some of the forces that shaped her - we all(LP 1985,
compose for the rest of her life, 35 more years. have to balance the tensions that pull our lives in dif-CD 1989).
Rebecca Clarke remained active and mentally ag- ferent directions. This is certainly part of her appeal as
ile until her death at 93. Documents such as her fas- a figure - her self-doubt makes her a figure of empa-
cinating memoir, which she started writing after her thy, giving her a human warmth that so many of her
husband's death, reveal her reflections and revela- male contemporaries in the panoply of 'great' com-
tions on events decades earlier. Thus writing in the posers lack. Her entire mature life, Clarke held onto to
1960s, she contemplates that she grew up in a sexu- her identity as a composer but she also constantly
I gratefully ac-
ally repressive age, and in her memoir and in the in- struggled with this identity. Our century has seen
knowledge the
terviews finally observes that, as a woman compos- many changes, great upheavals in the nature and defi- generosity of
er, she was occasionally treated unfairly. During the nition of music, and with them changes in the identi- Clarke's heirs, in
course of her long life, Clarke touched a great many ty of what a composer is; the roles defined for women particular
lives with her deep love of chamber music, the com- have changed as well. While today obstacles remain Christopher
it John-
son and Daniel C.
pelling voice of her compositions, and also her is encouraging and uplifting that Clarke lived into an
Braden, for access
warmth and charm. She taught extensively, but, to age in which women could be more honestly accepted
to and permission
my knowledge, entirely privately, viola, violin, theo- as composers. She lived to see that the artistic worth to
of quote from un-
ry and composition. Even those who knew her only her music was being rediscovered, a process that con- published material
late in life speak of her energy and lively wit. And tinues today in Clarke's estate.