Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I. I NTRODUCTION 4
The presence of the human body and hand affect input 5
Attenuator
impedance, far-field radiation pattern, radiation efficiency, and
90° hybrid coupler
the magnitude of the near field([1]). With the continuous trend
to smaller hand-held devices with more functionality and more
wireless bands, the possible insufficient over-the-air (OTA)
performance becomes a growing concern for service providers. Mismatch detection & Automatching algorithm
To improve antenna radiation performance, antennas have
high radiation efficiency and mismatched efficiency. Therefore,
since adaptive impedance matching system seem to be the Fig. 1. Proposed adaptive load impedance matching control.
promising solution for improving antenna impedance, many
researchers have been working on adaptive hand effect tuning
system([2]-[5]). The proposed adaptive matching system, which is illustrated in
Adaptive impedance tuning systems have been reported Fig. 1, consists of three blocks: a 5-port reflectometer, a control
using magnitude and phase measurement, phase difference unit and an impedance tuner. Once the reflectometer detects a
measurement, or standing wave ratio measurement. But the mismatched antenna impedance, it triggers the control unit
reported method have some disadvantages, as follows: Vec- which will adjust the impedance tuner to compensate the
tor(magnitude and phase) measurement based on analytic com- mismatch. In this structure, a controller tunes the matching net-
putation. Usually this requires a computationally expensive work and calculates real component and reactive component
control loop. Adaptation methods that use the sign of the of antenna impedance based on the measurement of the reflec-
phase difference to tune a reactive component to zero. These tometer using simple computation. The measured mismatched
methods usually employ RF phase detectors or FosterSeeley antenna impedance can be improved by the impedance tuner
discriminators and can’t tune a real component to 50 ohm. op- and matching algorithm.
timization techniques have been commonly used to minimize
standing wave ratio(SWR). Different optimization approaches, II. A NTENNA I MPEDANCE M EASUREMENT
such as simplex and single step, genetic algorithm, have been
used to minimize the network input reflection coefficient as In order to measure antenna impedance, The 5-port reflec-
much as possible or at least down to an acceptable level. These tometer consists of a directional coupler, a Wilkinson divider,
optimization methods search for the right component tuning an attenuator, a ring hybrid, three power detectors. Antenna
setting through an iterative process, consuming a considerable impedance can be calculated using the power detected by the
amount of time to reach the tuning goal. In addition, depending port3, port4, port5. The antenna impedance can be matched
on the optimizer choice and its initial settings, there is a risk by using a tuner core. It consists of one tunable capacitor in
of converging into local minima. series ( C1 ) and two tunable capacitors in shunt (C2 , C3 ). The
In this work, we use a 5-port reflectometer to measure impedance control unit can control the total impedance of the
antenna impedance with improved computation complexity. tuner core impedance and antenna impedance.
Start
a1 a2
Five-port Reflectometer ZL Measure imaginary part using (4)
b1 b2
P4> P5 P4< P5
Γ2 Increase C 1 δ 1 = P 4 -P 5 =0 ? Decrease C 1
a3 b3 a4 b4 a5 b5
Minimize δ 2 = |P 4 -0.5 |
P3 P4 P5
NO Matching condition? NO
Fig. 2. Block diagram of proposed 5-port reflectometer.
YES
End
Im
q5
Fig. 4. Flow chart of proposed matching algorithm.
Γ2 = x + yj (3a)
1 1 1 1
P4 = ( √ + √ Γ2 )2 , P5 = ( √ − √ Γ2 )2 (3b)
|Γ|=1 2 2 2 2 2 2
q4
x = P4 − P5 (3c)
The forward power P3 , the sum(Σ) port power P4 , and the y = P 4 − P5 (4b)
delta(Δ) port power P5 are extracted by 5-port structure. In From the above equations, it is noted that the proposed 5-
Fig. 2, reflected power wave each port can be expressed as port reflectometer only need 2 addition operation. For six-port
a3 a4 a5 reflectometer needs 12 multiplication, 9 addition and 2 division
Γ3 = = 0, Γ4 = = 0, Γ5 = = 0, (1a) operations. The reflection coefficient of Fig. 3 illustrates the
b3 b4 b5
−j basic operation of the proposed reflectometer.
b3 = √ (C + IT Γ2 )a1 (1b)
2
−1 1 III. M ATCHING A LGORITHM
b4 = (C + IT Γ2 )a1 − √ k Φ(I + CT Γ2 )a1 (1c) The matching algorithm was developed for adaptive load
2 2
j −j impedance matching. From (4) and (2) perfect matching
b5 = (C + IT Γ2 )a1 + √ k Φ(I + CT Γ2 )a1 (1d) 1
condition can be expressed as, when k = 2√ , Φ = −90◦
2 2 2
Where the letters T , I, C, k and Φ are used for convenience in δ1 = P4 − P5 = 0, y = 0 (5a)
order to indicate through, isolation, coupled, attenuation and 1
δ2 = P4 − = 0, x = 0 (5b)
phase shift, respectively. If the directional coupler is ideal, viz. 2
the directivity of the coupler is infinite(I = 0, T = 1), The Our algorithm can be written as follows:
sum(Σ) port power P4 , and the delta(Δ) port power P5 can Step 1: When it is determined that imaginary part of
be expressed as reflection coefficient Γ2 is positive(P4 > P5 ), the impedance
controller continuously increases the capacitance value of the
b4 2 1
P4 = | | = ( √ + k Φ · Γ2 ) 2 (2a) variable capacitor C1 , and determines whether or not an
b3 2 increase/decrease in the imaginary part value is reversed(y =
b5 2 1 0). That is, on the assumption that the total impedance of
P5 = | | = ( √ − k Φ · Γ2 )2 (2b)
b3 2 the antenna is located in the inductive region, the imagi-
nary part of reflection coefficient decreases as the impedance
858
2013 Asia-Pacific Microwave Conference Proceedings
V. C ONCLUSION
C2 L1
Five-port architectures are proposed as a reflectometer for
Γ2 adaptive load impedance matching. The proposed reflectome-
ter requires computationally simple control loop. Moreover,
experimental results show that the proposed Five-port architec-
C1 C3 L2 tures can be used as a low-cost, simple and high-performance
reflectometer in adaptive load matching systems.
0.8
120 60
1.0
0.8
120 60 www.speag.com.
0.6 0.6
150 30 150 30
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
R EFERENCES
0.0 180 0 0.0 180 0
0.2 0.2
[1] C. H. Li, E. Ofli, N. Chavannes and N. Kuster, “Effects of hand
0.4 0.4 phantom on mobile phone antenna performance,” IEEE Trans. Antennas
0.6
210 330
0.6
210 330
& Propagat., vol. 57, pp. 2763–2770, Sep. 2009.
0.8 0.8 [2] F. Meng, A. van Bezooijen, and R. Mahmoudi, “A mismatch detector for
240 300 240 300
1.0
270
1.0
270 adaptive impedance matching” in Proc. 36th Eur. Microw. Conf., 2006,
a) b) pp. 1457–1460.
1.0
90 [3] J. de Mingo, A. Valdovinos, A. Crespo, D. Navarro, and P. Garcia, “An
0.8
120 60
RF electronically controlled impedance tuning network design and its
0.6
150 30 MCU(8051) Impedance tuner
application to an antenna input impedance automatic matching system,”
0.4
(Tunable BST capacitors)
IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 52, pp. 489–497, Feb. 2004.
0.2 [4] Q. Gu, J. R. de Luis, A. S. Morris and J. Hilbert, “An analytical algorithm
0.0 180 0
Port 1
Port 2
Antenna(QIFA)
for pi-network impedance tuners,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I, Reg.
0.2
0.4
Signal generator
915 MHz ,20 dBm
Proposed
5-port
Papers, vol. 58, pp. 2894–2905, Dec. 2011.
Reflectometer
0.6
210 330
Port 3 Port 4 Port 5
[5] E. L. Firrao, A. J. Annema and B. Nauta, “An automatic antenna tuning
0.8 system using only RF signal amplitudes,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II,
1.0
240
270
300
Exp. Briefs, vol. 55, pp. 833–837, Sep. 2008.
c) d)
859