Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Economic Disparities?
Pakistan in detail in order to understand how the disparity and
bitterness grew. (The actual control of the state remained with
West Pakistan; the army, the bureaucracy, the politicians - all of
them were largely from West Pakistan, As industry was based on a
private market economy, the people who were already strong
financially became even stronger, Since, compared to East Pakistan, the
infrastructure in West Pakistan was more highly developed, industry
naturally grew in the latter region. Combined with this was the fact that
investment was provided largely by West Pakistan. The industrialisation.
programmes of various governments were more concentrated in the
western wing, while the resources came from the eastern one.
Economic disparity fostered feelings of economic injustice which was
the main cause behind the political alienation of East Pakistan. During
1951-1952, the per capita income of East Pakistan was only 85% of
that of West Pakistan: this figure continued to fall, until by 1969-1970,
the per capita income of East Pakistan was 60% of that of West
Pakistan. Of the total industry of Pakistan, West Pakistanis owned more
than 85% and a major part of the industry was located in West
Pakistan.)
The East Pakistanis believed that the development of the
western part had taken place at the expense of the eastern one. Blatant
resource transfer was alleged to have taken place. The exports from
East Pakistan in the years. 1950 to 1970 were 50% to 60% af Pakistan's
total exports. The imports, on the other hand, were only 30% for East
Pakistan out of the total imports for Pakistan. East Pakistan was able
to have the larger exports because of its main produce, jute, that
was in demand the world over. (The earnings from the jute were
utilised more in West Pakistan than in East Pakistan.) Thus, Pakistan's
economy was based on the export earnings of East Pakistan. This situation.
continued until the late 1960s, by which time West Pakistan was able to
finance its industry substantially. However, it was felt that the bill for the
consumer and capital goods, being imported into West Pakistan, was
being paid by East Pakistan. It is estimated that during the 1950s, resource
transfer from the eastern to the western wing via international trade was nearly
as much as Rs. 1000 million per year (it became substantially lower in the
1960s).
The laws that govern economics are based on actual availability of
resources. As the economy became stronger, with East Pakistan
maintaining huge surpluses, inflation reared its ugly head More money
was needed now to buy the same things. The principal demand of the
eastern province was rice: as more money incomes became available,
more demand for rice became apparent. This demand could not be met by
West Pakistan, as it did not produce enough rice and there was also a
government enforced ban on movement of rice between the two wings. The result
was that a larger amount of money wae need to hùu riaa .
Scanned with CamScanner
Cultural Disparities
While political and economic causes of disunity were
mainly responsible for the eventual creation of Bangladesh, cultural and
social conflicts also played a great role. In West Pakistan, there was more
internal
281
282
puty which presented the Muslims of India, Pམy was born in Bengal, its first
wII]
284