You are on page 1of 63

JNAFAU SCHOOL OF PLANNING AND

ARCHITECTURE
Mahaveer Marg, Hyderabad – 500 028

DEPARTMENT OF FACILITIES AND SERVICES PLANNING

BUILDING SERVICES STUDIO VII


PORTFOLIO – 01

SUBMITTED TO: SUBMITTED BY:

MR. M.VINAY SIR CH.DILEEP PAVAN BABU[20011BB021]

MR. S. SANTHOSH KUMAR SIR P.SAI PRANAV [20011BB013]

M. JANSI [20011BB016]

HOD: AR. Divya Patil Mam EXTERNAL EXAMINER:


TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION

BUILDING OVERVIEW

SUSTAINABLE BUILDING FEATURES

ENERGY CONSUMPTION ANALYSIS

WATER CONSUMPTION ANALYSIS

MATERIAL AND REUSE CHOICES

ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION

CASE STUDY ANALYSIS

IMPROVEMENTS

CONCLUSION

REFERENCES
SITE NAME : CII SOHRABJI GODREJ GREEN
BUSINESS CENTRE
LOACTION : HYDERABAD
SITE AREA : 4.5 ACRES
BUILT UP AREA : 20,000 SQ FT
ARCHITECT : AR. Karan Grover
OWNED BY : CII[Confederation of Indian Industry]
CONCEPTION YEAR : 2000
COMPLETION YEAR : 2004 JULY
TYPOLOGY : Commercial and Institutional
ARCHITECTURAL STYLE : Modern and
Traditional Green building
FACING : South East Direction
RATING : LEED PLATINUM RATING
COST OF BUILDNG : 8CR By AP Govt & 5CR By
GODREJ For Construction
COMMENTS : INDIA’S FIRST LEED PLATINUM
RATED BUILDING
BUILDING OVERVIEW

CII SOHRABJI GODREJ GREEN BUSINESS CENTRE is in financial


district of Hyderabad, surrounded by landmarks such as Shilparamam,
Hitex exhibition centre, and some business centres like Cyber towers,
GOOGLE, ORACLE, DELLOITTE.
70% of existing landscape and contour was retained on surface the water
body is preserved at site in NORTH side of site, site is flat on SOUTH
WEST side and Plateau on EAST side . site is densely covered with
vegetation and various species of animals and birds.

ENVIRONMENTAL & ECONOMIC BENEFITS


 IMPROVED AIR AND WATER QUALITY
 REDUCE WASTE STREAMS
 CONSERVE AND RESTORE NATURAL RESOURCES

 ENHANCE AND PROTECT BIODIVERSITY


 REDUCE OPERATIONAL COSTS
 IMPROVE OCCUPANT PRODUCTIVITY
LOCATION

SITE ENTRANCE : the site has an access from secondary road which
subdues the traffic load to and from the campus the circular form carves a
arc route by tress and shrubs , further which gets divided towards parking
such as arrangement ensures security and privacy.

MAIN GATE
ENTRANCE

PARKING : The parking area is close to the entrance yet placed on oblique
axis to minimize visibility the vista around the entrance reduces the impact
of the mechanical vehicles making the site more alive and green.

WIND TOWER : Wind towers


are generally a traditional technique to maintain the circulation of natural
air inside the building. This is basically, a tall tower with an opening at the
top to catch prevailing winds and bring it down to cool the interior of the
building. As a result, this is one of the best strategies for heat
management. In this building wind tower’s role is to pass the pre-cooled
air directly to the Air Handling Unit, so that the mechanism burden of
AHU can be controlled.
RAIN WATER HARVESTING POND : The pond itself acts as a surface
water reservoir, helps to recharge groundwater and reduce the salinity
levels.

JAALI WALLS : Jaali walls act


us a screen wall also provides
sufficient amount of natural
ventilation and daylight inside the building. This also performs aesthetically in the building’s
exterior. Huge trees are planting near the jaali wall to block and prevent the heat from direct
sunlight. 90% of daylight is using efficiently inside the building which results in the
reduction of electricity usage during day times.

PRESERVED VEGETATION ON SITE

SOLAR PANELS
ROOFGARDENS : Absorbing heat and radiating it into the building

DOUBLE GLAZED GLASS


this is minimized through the roof gardens covering 55% of roof area Main advantage of
these glasses they reduce and rain water is also harvested by it.
heat transfer by conduction and radiation.
HIGHLIGHTING KEY FEATURES
 55% REDUCTION WITH ASHRAE 90% AS THE BASELINE
120,000 KWH/YEAR.
 35% REDUCTION IN POTABLE WATER CONSUMPTION.
 20% OF BUILDING ENERGY REQUIREMNETS ARE CATERED
BY SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAICS THE SOLAR PV HAS AN
INSTALLED CAPACITY OF 235 KW.
 80% OF MATERIALS USED IN BUILDING ARE OUTSOURCED
WITHIN 500 MILES FROM THE PROJECT SITE.
 20% REDUCTION OF LOAD ON AIR CONDITIONING
SYSTEM BY THE USE OF WIND TOWERS.
 88% OF THE INDOORS ARE ACCESSIBLE TO NATURAL
DAYLIGHTING.
SUSTAINABLE SITE
FEATURES

LEED FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION V2.0


SUSTAINABLE SITES

SS Prerequisite 1: Construction Activity Pollution


Prevention Required
Specifications of Erosion and Sediment Controls
Preventive Measures listed in EPA Standards are used in the Landscape and Site
development works of CII site, to control erosion, retain sediments on the site and reduce the
environmental effect of runoff and to ameliorate the effects of reduced soil permeability
resulting from site development.
1. Erosion controls
Erosion controls proposed for CII site include:
A. Preserving Topsoil and Limiting disturbance.
B. Contour Trenching
C. Seeds, Mulches and fertilizers
D. Sodding
These measures will reduce the amount of sediments that will be detached during
construction of structures on site and prevent sediments from entering runoff.
2. Sediment controls
Sediment controls proposed for CII site include:
A. Soak pits / Wells
B. Geotextiles
C. Grassed Swales with Trench Drains
D. Drainage structures
E. Filtration and Detention basins with sand filter
i. for piped drainage
ii. for surface swales
F. Water body with overflow connected to storm outfall of site.
These measures will help in capturing sediment that is transported in runoff from the site.
Sequence of implementing
Sequence of implementing the above measures is important for the effectiveness of erosion
and sediment controls. This includes
A. Development and stabilization measures necessary before construction.
B. Development and stabilization measures, during construction.
C. Development and stabilization measures, post construction.
The details of ground disturbances are given below
Ground Disturbances of the site :
SITE AREA – 23,5625 SQM.
AREA OF TOP SOIL STRIPPED -8,900 SQM.
AREA OF TOP SOIL STACKED – 2,775 SQM.
AREA OF BUILT STRUCTURE – 1,175 SQM.
AREA OF ROADS , PARKING – 1,150 SQM.

CONCLUSION As per credit requirement CII GBC has taken Good soil erosion and
sediment control measures so it can achieve this credit.

SS CREDIT 1 : SITE SELECTION [ 1 POINT ]


INTENT : AVOID DEVELOPMENT OF INAPPROPRIATE SITES AND REDUCE THE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FROM THE LOCATION OF A BUILDING ON A SITE.
REQUIREMENTS: do not develop buildings on portions of sites that meet any one of the
following criteria
 Prime farmland as defined by the local farmland trust.
 Land whose elevation is lower than 5feet above the elevation of 100 year flood as
defined by FEMA.
 Land which provides habitat for nay species on the Federal or state , threatened or
endangered list.
 Within 100 feet of any wetland as defined by 40 CFR, parts 230-233 and part 22 or
defined by local or state rule or law, whichever is more stringent.
 Land which prior to acquisition for the project was public parkland, unless land of
equal or greater value as parkland is accepted in trade by the public landowner.
EXPLANATION:
The site for GBC-CII building is located on the north-east outskirts of Hyderabad in Andhra
Pradesh. Hyderabad is a rapidly growing center for Information Technology related industry,
and the Hyderabad Urban Development Authority has designated the north east outskirts
(where the site is located) as "Cyberabad Development Zone" to promote the growth of
industry.The site falls within a rocky area designated for urban development by the
Hyderabad Urban Development Authority. It is not prime farmland, nor is it suitable for
agriculture. The site does not fall within flood plains. The site has an elevation of +610.000 to
+620.00 (data from soil report) above mean level. The site does not have endangered species,
indigenous wildlife. It does not support perennial indigenous vegetation. Also the site is not
located within 100 feet of the wetland.
FIGURE 01 : SITE

CONCLUSION: as per provided data the building can earn the points of this credit.as it
satisfies the above regulations like it is not prime farmland, nor is it suitable for agriculture.
The site does not fall within flood plains. The site has an elevation of +610.000 to +620.00
(data from soil report) above mean level. The site does not have endangered species,
indigenous wildlife. It does not support perennial indigenous vegetation. Also the site is not
located within 100 feet of the wetland.

SS CREDIT 4.1 : ALTERNATIVE


TRANSPORTATION: PUBLIC
TRANSPORTATION ACCESS. [1 POINT ]
INTENT : REDUCE THE POLLUTION AND LAND DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS FROM
AUTOMOBILE USE.
REQUIREMENTS : locate building within ½ mile of a commuter rail, light rail or subway
station or ¼ mile of 2 or more bus lines.
EXPLANATION: There are several public transport facilities with taxi , auto facilities that
are available near to site
TSRTC BUSSTOP = 0.27 miles from the site building
OLA / RAPIDO STOP 01 = 0.14 miles from the site building
OLA / RAPIDO STOP 02 = 0.18 miles from the site building
CAD drawing [SS 4.1] is provided. This area drawing highlights the building location,
showing the local transport stops .
CONCLUSION: as per provided data the building can earn the points of this credit, as there
are bus stop and taxi pickup points that are located within ¼ from the site.

SS CREDIT 4.2 : ALTERNATIVE TRANSPORTATION: BICYCLE


STORAGE AND CHANGING ROOMS [ 1 POINT ]
INTENT : REDUCE POLLUTION AND LAND DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS FROM
AUTOMOBILE USE.
REQUIREMENTS: provide suitable means for securing bicycles with convenient
changing/shower facilities for use by the cyclists for 5% or more of the building occupants.
EXPLANATION :
CAD drawing [SS 4.2] is provided which represents the access for cyclists and their parking.
And locations of shower rooms in building.
CALCULATION :
PERMANENT OCCUPANCY – 45
NUMBER OF MEN - 25
NUMBER OF WOMEN - 20
5 % of PERMANENT OCUUPANTS – 2.25 = 3
TOILET FACILITIES – 7
SHOWER ROOMS PROVIDED EACH FOR MEN AND WOMEN.
CONCLUSION : as per provided data the building can earn the points of this credit, as the
facilities that are present in the site accommodate 5% or more of the building occupants.

SS CREDIT 4.3: ALTERNATIVE


TRANSPORTATION: LOW EMITTING AND
FUEL EFFICIENT VEHICLES [ 1 POINT ]
INTENT : REDUCE POLLUTION AND LAND DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS FROM
AUTOMOBILE USE.
REQUIREMENTS : install alternative fuel refilling station for 3% of the total vehicular
parking capacity of the site.
EXPLANATION :
CAD drawing [SS 4.3] is provided which represents the location of recharging facility for
battery powered vehicles in site.

CALCULATION :
TOTAL VEHICULAR PARKING – 24
3% OF TOTAL VEHICULAR PARKING = 0.72 = 1
ALTERNATIVE REFUELING FACILITY FOR I VEHICLE IS PROVIDED WHICH IS
GREATER THAN 3% OF TOTAL PARKING.
CONCLUSION : as per provided data the building can earn the points of this credit, as the
facilities provided accommodate 3% or more of the total parking capacity.

SS CREDIT 4.4: ALTERNATIVE


TRANSPORTATION: PARKING CAPACITY [ 1
POINT ]
INTENT : REDUCE POLLUTION AND LAND DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS FROM
AUTOMOBILE USE.
REQUIREMENTS: size parking capacity not to exceed minimum local zoning requirements
and provide preferred parking for carpools or vanpools capable of serving 5% of building
occupants. [OPTION-1].
EXPLANATION :
CAD drawing [ SS 4.4] is provided which represents parking which capable of serving 5% of
building occupants.
CALCULATION :
PARKING AREA :
TOTAL BUILTUP AREA – 17926.00 SQFT
GROSS PARKING AREA PROVIDED – 14000.00 SQFTT
PARKING REQUIRED AS PER LOCAL ZONING LAWS – 8154.00 SQFT
CAR POOL PARKING
TOTALPERMANENT OCCUPANCY – 45
5% OF BUILDING OCCUPANTS – 2.25
PREFERED CAR POOL PARKING PROVIDED - 3
CONCLUSION : as per provided data the building can earn the points of this credit, as the
site provides preferred parking for carpools or vanpools for 5% of the total provided parking
spaces.

SS CREDIT 5.1: SITE DEVELOPMENT:


PROTECT OR RESTORE HABITAT
[ 1 POINT ]
INTENT : CONSERVE EXISTING NATURAL AREAS AND RESTORE DAMAGED
AREAS TO PROVIDE HABITAT AND PROMOTE BIODIVERSITY.
REQUIREMENTS : On greenfield sites, limit all site disturbance to 40 feet beyond the
building perimeter; 10 feet beyond surface,walkways, patios, surface parking and utilities less
than 12 inches in diameter; 15 feet beyond primary roadway curbs and main utility branch
trenches; and 25 feet beyond constructed areas with permeable surfaces (such as pervious
paving areas, stormwater detention facilities and playing fields) that require additional
staging areas in order to limit compaction in the constructed area.
[OPTION-1]
EXPLANATION : CAD drawing [SS 5.1] is provided which represents the limits of site
disturbance.
CONCLUSION : as per provided data in the cad plan which represents the limits of site
disturbances the building can earn the points of this credit as the limit of sites disturbance
satisfies OPTION-1.

SS CREDIT 5.2: SITE DEVELOPMENT:


MAXIMIZE OPEN SPACE [ 1 POINT ]
INTENT : PROVIDE A HIGH RATIO OF OPEN SPACE TO DEVELOPMENT
FOOTPRINT TO PROMOTE BIODIVERSITY.
REQUIREMENTS : Reduce the development footprint (defined as the total area of the
building footprint, hardscape, access roads and parking) and/or provide vegetated open space
within the project boundary to exceed the local zoning’s open space requirement for the site
by 25%.[OPTION-1].
EXPLANATION : CAD drawing [SS 5.2] is provided which represents the building
footprint exceeds the local zoning open space criteria for the site by 25%.
CALCULATION :
AREA OF THE SITE – 253505 SQFT
PERMISSIBLE DEVELOPED AREA ON PLOT AS PER LOCAL ZONING LAWS
– 101402 SQFT
AREA OF BUILDING FOOT PRINT – 32882 SQFT

WHICH EXCEEDS LOCAL ZONING REQUIREMENTS BY MORE THAN 25%.


= 40%
So the points of this credit can be achieved by the building
CONCLUSION : as per provided data the building can earn the points of this credit as the
data provided shows that the project exceeds the local zoning requirements by more than
25%.

SS CREDIT 6.1: STROM WATER DESIGN:


QUALITY CONTROL [ 1 POINT ]
INTENT : LIMIT DISRUPTION OF NATURAL WATER HYDROLOGY BY REDUCING
IMPERVIOUS COVER, INCREASING ON SITE INFILTRATION, REDUCING OR
ELIMINATING POLLUTION FROM STROM WATER RUNOFF AND ELIMINATING
CONTAMINANTS.
REQUIREMENTS : CASE 1 — EXISTING IMPERVIOUSNESS IS LESS THAN OR
EQUAL TO 50% Implement a stormwater management plan that prevents the post-
development peak discharge rate and quantity from exceeding the pre-development peak
discharge rate and quantity for the one- and two-year 24-hour design storms.
EXPLANATION :
Area statement of different surfaces prior to development :
Site Area -23,562 sqm
SLOPES AREA
rocks 722 sqm
slopes > 33%. 840sqm
slopes > 10% 5560sqm
slopes 3% to 10%. 4630sqm
slopes 1% to 3%nnn. 9810sqm
slopes 0% to 1%. 2000sqm
TOTAL. 23,562 sqm

Calculations :
IMPERVIOUS AREA = SURFACE AREA X RUNOFF COEFFICIENT
Type. Surface area Runoff coeff Impervious area
Rocks 722 sqm. 0.95 686 sqm
Turf slopes
0% to 1% 2000 sqm 0.25 500 sqm
1% to 3% 9810 sqm 0.35. 3434 sqm
3% to 10% 4630 sqm 0.40. 1852 sqm
> 10% 6400 sqm 0.45 2880 sqm
TOTAL AREA 23562 sqm
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA. 9352 sqm

IMPERVIOUSNESS = TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA / TOTAL AREA


9352sqm /23562sqm = 39.69%.
as the imperviousness is less than 50% it comes under CASE 1
ONEDAY RAINFALL CALCULATION :
AVERAGE RAINFALL INTENSITY CONSIDERED [ M/ DAY ]= 0.016
Total rainwater run-off captured from roof and non roof areas in cum/day = 149.48 cum
Lets take approximate value as 150 cum.
1 CUM = 1000 L
150 CUM = 1,50,000 L PER DAY
A rainwater harvesting pond is there with capacity = 8,00,000 LPD
So that concludes that is has more capacity than 150 KLPD it can store more day one day
peak rainfall
STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN CII GBC : rain water management is
carried in CII GBC by
 Rain water harvesting pond with capacity of 8 lakh litre capacity.
 Drains are available at roof level and also present various areas of floor.
 Several rainwater harvesting pits are present all over building area where they collect
the rain water from the drain present on roof area.
 And the rainwater collected from the roof area and other areas within the building are
sent to rain water harvesting pond.
 Aeration pond is present beside this pond which carries oxidation continuously
 The water is used for various purposes like for landscaping etc

FIGURE 01 : RAINWATER
HARVESTING POND

FIGURE 02 : AERATION POND

CONCLUSION : as per provided data the building can earn the points of this credit , as the
results from the calculations performed are falling under the CASE-1 requirements of this
credit i.e is imperviousness of the site is 39.69% which is less than 50%. And the rainwater
harvesting system which is present in the building which has 8 lakhs lpd capacity where peak
rainfall is 150 klpd so it can handle more than one day rainfall.

SS CREDIT 6.2: STROM WATER DESIGN: QUALITY CONTROL


[ 1 POINT ]
INTENT : LIMIT DISRUPTION AND POLLUTION OF NATURAL WATER FLOWS BY
MANAGING STROMWATER RUNOFF.
REQUIREMENTS : implement a storm water management plan that results in : treatment
systems designed to remove 80% of the average annual post development phosphorus [TP]
by implementing best management practices [BMPs] outlined in EPA’s Guidance specifying
management measures for sources of non-point pollution in coastal waters [ EPA 840-B-92-
002 1/93].
EXPLANATION:
Area statement of different surfaces on completion of construction activity
Site Area 23.562 sqm
Roof Area of Built structures 1,175 sqm
Area of Roads, Parking 1,150 sqm
Area of gravel paths 770 sqm
Area of rocks 722 sqm
Area of planting 19,107 sqm
i Roof lawn. 782 sqm
Native grasses and shrubs
ii On slopes > 33% 840 sqm
Native grasses and shrubs
iii Forests ( trees and native grasses and shrubs) on
a. slopes 10% to 33% 4,170 sqm
b. slopes 3% to 10% 1,295 sqm
c. slopes 1% to 3% 7,865 sqm
d. slopes 0 to 1% 270 sqm
iv. grassed areas in maintained landscape, grass swales, treatment basins
a. slopes 10% to 33% 1,130 sqm
b. slopes 1% to 3% 1,220 sqm
c. slopes 0% to 1% 1,005 sqm
v. shrubs 1% to 3% in maintained landscape 530 sqm
Area of drainage / treatment structures
1. water body 1.0mn deep 1055sqm
2. filtration and detention pond for surface swales 60sqm
3. filtration and detention pond for piped drainage 20 sqm
4. soak pits Snos.(@7sqm (17.5 cum). 35 sqm
5. Root zone treatment. 250 sqm

Measures for removal of TSS and TP, Specifications


Development on the CII site will reduce the permeability of the land, increase in runoff and
reduce the time in which runoff is concentrated. Resulting in erosion, increased contaminated
storm water runoff from roads, parking lots, and roof drains. Thus increasing pollution and
sediments in the storm water runoff from the sit,
choking storm water channels.
Thus measures need be taken on site to accomplish the following
1. decreasing the erosive potential of increased runoff volumes and velocities associated with
development induced changes in hydrology. Retarding storm water runoff via various water
impoundment techniques so that peak runoff for frequent storms (10 year or less recurrence
probability) will be no greater after
development than before.
2. removing suspended solids and associated pollutants entrained in runoff that result from
activities occurring during and after development: Removal of 80 percent of total suspended
solids (TSS) is assured to control heavy metals, phosphorus, and other pollutants.
3. retain hydrological conditions to closely resemble those of the pre disturbance condition.
EPA Standards
MEASURES FOR REMOVAL OF TSS AND TP, SPECIFICATIONS
Measures proposed for CII, Hyderabad and based on EPA Standards to control runoff
include:
1. Minimizing the use of paved drains and drainage pipes and maximizing the use of
vegetated
drainage swales.. This is achieved by
1A. Use of paved drains and drainage pipes for roof drains only.
IB. Use of vegetated drainage swales for draining paths, roads, parking lots, landscaped areas
and slopes.
2. Infiltration measures.
Providing maximum opportunity for rain waters to infiltrate the soil by
2A. Contour Trenching
2B. Grassed Swales with Trench Drains.
2C. Vegetation Cover
2D. Soak pits / Wells
2E. Porous Paving
2F. Geotextiles
VEGETATION COVER
Vegetation impedes runoff and facilitate a greater degree of infiltration. The site will be
covered by an area of 16765 sqm of vegetative cover. This includes permanent forest cover of
native tree species, natural grasses, shrubs, agriculture crops and grass lawns and maintained
landscape around the built structures only. This is indicated on Plan showing erosion and
sediment controls, post construction measures.
Vegetation Cover.

Area of planting 19,107 sqm


-Roof lawn 782 sqm
Native grasses and shrubs
-On slopes> 33% 840 sqm
Native grasses and shrubs
-Forests ( trees and native grasses and shrubs) on
slopes 10% to 33% 4,170 sqm
slopes 3% to 10% 1,295 sqm
slopes 1% to 3% 7,865 sqm
slopes 0 to l%. 270 sqm
- grassed areas in maintained landscape, grass swales, treatment basins.
slopes 10% to 33% 1,130 sqm
slopes 1% to 3% 1,220 sqm
slopes 0% to 1%. 1,005 sqm
shrubs 1% to 3% in maintained landscape. 530 sqm
TABLE SHOWS LIST OF NATIVE TREES
These minimal maintenance landscape strategies help in substantially reducing nonpoint
source impacts associated with the application of fertilizers, pesticides & herbicides which
are a result of landscape development of the site, The vegetative cover helps in reducing soil
erosion and run off from the site.
CONCLUSION : as per provided data the building can earn the points of this credit , as
measures followed are helping in reducing polluting of natural water and satisfying the
requirements.

SS CREDIT 7.2: HEAT ISLAND EFFECT: ROOF [ 1 POINT ]


INTENT : REDUCE HEAT ISLANDS [ THERMAL GRADIENT DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN DEVELOPED AND UNDEVELOPED AREAS , TO MINIMIZE IMPACT ON
MICROCLIMATE AND HUMAN AND WILDLIFE HABITAT.
REQUIREMENTS : Install a vegetated roof for at least 50% of the roof area
[OPTION-2].
EXPLANATION : CAD drawing [SS 7.2] is provided which represents the areas where
terrace/roof gardens are present in the building.
ROOF AREA CALCULATIONS SHOWING TERRACE GARDENS
AREA CALCULATIONS
AREA OF TERRACE GARDEN A – 199 SQM
AREA OF TERRACE GARDEN B – 28 SQM
AREA OF TERRACE GARDEN C – 13 SQM
AREA OF TERRACE GARDEN D – 69 SQM
AREA OF TERRACE GARDEN E – 35 SQM
AREA OF TERRACE GARDEN F – 234 SQM
AREA OF TERRACE GARDEN G – 40SQM
AREA OF TERRACE GARDEN H – 18 SQM
AREA OF TERRACE GARDEN I – 30 SQM
AREA OF TERRACE GARDEN J – 32 SQM
AREA OF TERRACE GARDEN K – 84 SQM
TOTAL ROOF AREA – 1175 SQM
TOTAL LAWN AREA – 7825 SQM [ AREA INDICATED IN GREEN COLOUR ]
CONCLUSION : as per provided data the building earn the points of this credit , as the
vegetated roof of the building exceeds the 50% of the roof area.

WATER
CONSUMPTION
ANALYSIS
WATER EFFICIENCY
WE CREDIT 1.1 : WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPING : REDUCE
BY 50% [1 POINT]
INTENT: LIMIT OR ELIMINATE THE USE OF POTABLE WATER, OR OTHER
NATURAL SURFACE OR SUBSURFACE WATER RESOURCES AVALIABLE ON NEAR
THE PROJECT SITE FOR LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION.
REQUIREMENTS : Reduce potable water consumption for irrigation by 50% from a
calculated mid-summer baseline case. Reductions shall be attributed to any combination of
the following items
 Plant species factor
 Irrigation efficiency
 Use of captured rainwater
 Use of recycled wastewater
 Use of water treated and conveyed by a public agency specifically for non-potable
uses

WE CREDIT 1.2 : WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPING : NO


POTABLE WATER USE OR NO IRRIGATION [ 1 POINT IN
ADDITION TO WE CREDIT 1.1]
INTENT : ELIMINATE THE USE OF POTABLE WATER , OR OTHER NATURAL
SURFACE OR SUBSURFACE WATER RESOURCES AVALIABLE ON OR NEAR THE
PROJECT SITE , FOR LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION.
REQUIREMENTS : Achieve WE Credit 1.1.and: Use only captured rainwater, recycled
wastewater, recycled greywater, or water treated and conveyed by a public agency
specifically for non-potable uses for irrigation.

SOIL TYPE ANNUAL RAINFALL REQ [ IN MM ]

TREE SPECIES SHALLOW ROCKY MINIMUM MAXIMUM


albizia amara 5 5 500 1000
azadirachta indica 6 8 450 1150
bauhinia variegata 5 5 500 2750
cassia fistula 5 5 500 3000
cassia siamea 7 7 500 700
erythrina indica 5 6 500 1500
grewia tenax - shrub 7 7 200 1000
hatdwick binnata 8 8 250 1500
melea azedirach 5 6 350 2000
parkinsonia aculeate - shrub 7 8 200 1000
madhuca latifolia 5 7 550 1500
zizyphus nummularia - shrub 7 7 100 1000

TABLE IS THE LIST OF NATIVE TREE SPECIES AND THEIR RAINFALL AREA
DISTRIBUTION OF THE LANDSCAPE
1. LAWN AREA 3355 SQM
2. SHRUBS IN MAINTAINED LAND SCAPE 530 SQM
3. NATIVE SHRUBS 840 SQM
4. NATIVE TREES 13600 SQM
5. ROOF LAWN 782 SQM

TOTAL - 19,107 SQM

FIXTURES FLOW RATES


WC 6/3 LPF
FAUCET 4 LPM
SHOWERS 6 LPM
WATER LESS URINAL 0 LPM
HEALTH FAUCET 4 LPM
TAP 4 LPM

TABLE : FIXTURE AND FLOWRATES


estimation of water requirement
TOTAL NUMBER OF OCCUPANTS = 85
MALE OCCUPANTS = 62
FEMALE OCCUPANTS =23
BASELINE FIXTURE BASED WATER CONSUMPTION :
MALE WATER CONSUMPTION :
[ 6 X 62] X 1 + [ 4 X 62] X 4 + [6 X 62] 1 X [ 6 X 62] X 6 + [ 10 X 62] X 1= 4588 LPD
FEMALE WATER CONSUMPTION :
[ 6 X 23] X 1+ [ 3 X 23 ] X 4 + [ 6 X 23 ] X 1+ [ 6 X 23 ] X 6 +[ 10 X 23 ]X 1=1710 LPD
TOTAL WATER CONSUMPTION PER DAY = 6298 LPD
NUMBER OF WORKING DAYS = 250 DAYS
ANNUAL WATER CONSUMPTION = 6298 X 250 = 15,74,500 LPA
WATER EFFICIENT FIXTURES BASED WATER CONSUMPTION :
MALE WATER CONSUMPTION :
[ 6 X 62 ] X 1 + [ 4 X 62 ] X 1 + [ 4 X 62 ] X 6 + [ 6 X 62 ] X 1 = 2480 LPD
FEMALE WATER CONSUMPTION :
[ 6 X 23 ] X 1 + [ 4 X 23 ] X 1 +[ 3 X 23 ] X 4 + [ 4 X 23 ] X 6 +[ 6 X 23 ]X 1=1196 LPD
TOTAL WATER CONSUMPTION PER DAY = 3676 LPD
ANNUAL WATER CONSUMPTION = 3676 X 250 = 9,19,000 LPA
WATER SAVING PERCENTAGE = 41.6%
41.6% OF POTABLE WATER CONSUMPTION IS SAVED BY USING WATER
EFFICEINT PLUMBING FIXTURES .
Rain water harvesting :
Total rainwater run-off captured from roof and non roof areas in cum/day = 149.48 cum
Lets take approximate value as 150 cum.
1 CUM = 1000 L
150 CUM = 1,50,000 L PER DAY
A rainwater harvesting pond is there with capacity = 8,00,000 LPD
So that concludes that is has more capacity than 150 KLPD it can store more day one day
peak rainfall
 Rain water harvesting pond with capacity of 8 lakh litre capacity.
 Drains are available at roof level and also present various areas of floor.
 Several rainwater harvesting pits are present all over building area where they collect
the rain water from the drain present on roof area.
 And the rainwater collected from the roof area and other areas within the building are
sent to rain water harvesting pond.
 Aeration pond is present beside this pond which carries oxidation continuously
 The water is used for various purposes like for landscaping etc
 greywater from washings such as those from sinks, showers etc, for flushing toilets.
The generated wastewater can be treated on site to minimize the load on the municipal
efficient treatment system which, in turn can be recycled for application in irrigation
or for flushing.
Together of usage of water efficient fixtures , drought tolerant species and rainwater
harvesting CII GBC has eliminated usage of potable water by 50%.
CONCLUSION: as per provided data the building earn the points of these credits, as the
usage of potable water is reduced by 50% and the entire recycled water or harvested
rainwater is used for only irrigation purposes in the site.

WE CREDIT 2 : INNOVATIVE WASTEWATER TECHNOLOGIES


[ 1 POINT ]
INTENT: REDUCE GENERATION OF WASTEWATER AND POTABLE WATER
DEMAND WHILE INCREASING THE LOCAL AQUIFER RECHARGE.
REQUIREMENTS : Reduce potable water use for building sewage conveyance by 50%
through the use of water-conserving fixtures (water closets, urinals) or non-potable water
(captured rainwater, recycled greywater, and on-site or municipally treated wastewater).
[OPTION-1].
EXPLANATION: In the building, the wastewater generation minimized by the utilization of
low-flow fixtures, automatic controls and sensors. Also it can be attempted to utilize the
rainwater which is harvested , greywater from washings such as those from sinks, showers
etc, for flushing toilets. The generated wastewater can be treated on site to minimize the load
on the municipal efficient treatment system which, in turn can be recycled for application in
irrigation or for flushing. The building has a permanent occupancy of 85 with the male-
female ratio of 3:1. The fixtures and their flow rates to be used in the toilets are given in
Table

FIXTURES FLOW RATES


WC 6/3 LPF
FAUCET 4 LPM
SHOWERS 6 LPM
WATER LESS URINAL 0 LPM
HEALTH FAUCET 4 LPM
TAP 4 LPM

TABLE : FIXTURE AND FLOWRATES


BASELINE CRITERIA WATER CONSUMPTION :
TOTAL WATER CONSUMPTION PER DAY = 6298 LPD
NUMBER OF WORKING DAYS = 250 DAYS
ANNUAL WATER CONSUMPTION = 6298 X 250 = 15,74,500 LPA
WATER SAVING CRITERIA WATER CONSUMPTION :
TOTAL WATER CONSUMPTION PER DAY = 3676 LPD
ANNUAL WATER CONSUMPTION = 3676 X 250 = 9,19,000 LPA
WATER SAVING PERCENTAGE = 41.6%
41.6% OF POTABLE WATER CONSUMPTION IS SAVED BY USING WATER
EFFICEINT PLUMBING FIXTURES .
CONCLUSION : as per provided data the building can earn the points of this credit as the
use of innovative wastewater technologies option 1 by use of water efficient fixtures with low
flowrates and sensors and non potable water usage for irrigation , lushing and landscaping.

WE CREDIT 3.1 : WATER USE REDUCTION : REDUCE BY 20%


[1 POINT]
INTENT: MAXIMIZE WATER EFFICIENCY WITHIN BUILDINGS TO REDUCE THE
BURDEN ON MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY AND WASTE WATER SYSTEMS.
REQUIREMENTS : Employ strategies that in aggregate use 20% less water than the water
use baseline calculated for the building

WE CREDIT 3.2 : WATER USE REDUCTION : REDUCE BY 30% [


1 POINT IN ADDITION TO WE CREDIT 3.1]
INTENT : MAXIMIZE WATER EFFICIENCY WITHIN BUILDINGS TO REDUCE THE
BURDEN ON MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY AND WASTEWATER SYSTEMS.
REQUIREMENTS : Employ strategies that in aggregate use 30% less water than the water
use baseline calculated for the building (not including irrigation).
EXPLANATION :
Estimation of Potable water Use
as already given in above credit explanation the calculations made are
BASELINE CRITERIA WATER CONSUMPTION :
TOTAL WATER CONSUMPTION PER DAY = 6298 LPD
NUMBER OF WORKING DAYS = 250 DAYS
ANNUAL WATER CONSUMPTION = 6298 X 250 = 15,74,500 LPA
WATER SAVING CRITERIA WATER CONSUMPTION :
TOTAL WATER CONSUMPTION PER DAY = 3676 LPD
ANNUAL WATER CONSUMPTION = 3676 X 250 = 9,19,000 LPA
WATER SAVING PERCENTAGE = 41.6%
41.6% OF POTABLE WATER CONSUMPTION IS SAVED BY USING WATER
EFFICEINT PLUMBING FIXTURES .

FIXTURES FLOW RATES


WC 6/3 LPF
FAUCET 4 LPM
SHOWERS 6 LPM
WATER LESS URINAL 0 LPM
HEALTH FAUCET 4 LPM
TAP 4 LPM

TABLE : FIXTURE AND FLOWRATES

Root zone treatment system for the wastewater treatment


It is proposed to use a rootzone systems for the treatment of Wastewater from bathrooms,
toilets and kitchens for a daily occupancy of 85. This would result in daily generation of 3.5kl
of Wastewater. The rootzone method is based on the subsurface flow of wastewater. It uses
soil as the filtration medium for treating impurities such as heavy metals, phosphates nitrates
in the wastewater, This is a more efficient system due to the presence of large colonies of
microorganisms as the reed beds create the favourable conditions for the wide variety of
strains of microorganisms both the aerobic and anaerobic conditions, The proposed
wastewater treatment with an area of 250 sq.m is placed away from the building in the green
area Drawing performance of the similar system for treatment of wastewater from building is
shown below.
CONCLUSION : as per data provided the building can earn the points of these credits as the
use of low flow fixtures along with sensors results in saving potable water of 41.6%

ENERGY
CONSUMPTION
ANALYSIS
ENERGY AND ATMOSPHERE

BASIS OF DESIGN
Introduction
A central HVAC system shall be designed to provide year round thermal environmental
control for the Green Building Centre at Hyderabad.
Outdoor Design Conditions
Weather data file Wedco, which has been jointly compiled by TERI & ISHRAE has been
referred for creating A/C load profile by TERI.
Indoor Design Conditions :
Inside conditions considered for occupied areas as per brief given by TERI are as follows:
DESCRIPTION CONNECTED LOAD [ KW ]
LIGHTING @ 1.3 W / SFT [ AS PER
22
TERI ]
CONVENIENCE POWER [@ 1W / SFT
17
]
HVAC SYSTEM 75.3
PLUMBING AND DRAINAGE
28
SYSTEM
EXTERNAL LIGHTING 10
TOTAL CONNECTED LOAD 152.3 KW
MAXIMUM DEMAND WITH OVER
122 KW
ALL DIVERSITY 80%
AT PF OF 0.92 133 KW
TRANSFORMER SELECTED 1 NO .200 KVA
EA CREDIT 1 : OPTIMIZE ENERGY PERFORMANCE [1 – 10
POINTS]
INTENT : ACHIEVE INCREASING LEVELS OF ENERGY PERFORMANCE
ABOVE THE BASELINE IN THE PREREQUISITE STANDARD TO REDUCE
ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECONOMIC IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH
EXCESSIVE ENERGY USE.

NON RESIDENTIAL
OPAQUE ELEMENTS ASSEMBLY INSULATION MIN
MAXIMUM R VALUE
ROOFS
INSULATION ENTIRELY
ABOVE DECK U-0.063 R-15.0 ci
WALLS, ABOVE GRADE
MASS U-0.580 NR
FLOORS
MASS U-0.322 NR
SUB ON GRADE FLOORS
UNHEATED F-0.730 NR
OPAQUE DOORS
SWINGING U-0.700 NR
NON SWINGING U-1.450
ASSEMBLY ASSEMBLY MAX
FENESTRATION
MAXIMUM U SHGC
VERTICAL GLAZING % OF SHGCall-
WALL 10.1-20.0% Ufixed -1.22 0.19 ,SHGCnorth-0.61
SKYLIGHT WITH
CURB,GLASS% OF ROOF 0- SHGCall-0.19,
2.0% Uall-1.98 SHGCnorth-0.61
SKY LIGHT WITH CURB, SHGCall-
GLASS % OF ROOF 2.1-5.0% Uall-1.98 0.19,SHGCall-0.19
TABLE B1 MANDATORY BUILDING ENVELOPE REQUIREMENTS FOR GBC AS
PER ASHRAE 90.1-2001

SYSTEMS DESIGN NARRATIVE


Lighting Design
illumination levels
Increased system efficiency is the final step towards energy conservation where state of art
equipment is used to the minimized load, following the implementation of the first two steps.
The lighting system for the GBC we been designed to meet the ASHRAE/ IESNA standards
at a minimum load. Efficient lamps have primarily 15 Led. The fixtures have been chosen to
avoid direct glare and indirect lighting fixtures have mostly been The lighting scheme with
the predicted levels have been determined using Wipro lighting and LUMEN Vero 2000 and
has been attached. The lighting demand has been minimised to meet the IESNA standards for
illumination by providing task lighting for specific needs thereby reducing general lighting
requirements. The recommended horizontal and vertical illumination category for the spaces
which has been catered to in GBC are as follows
Area horizontal plane. Vertical plane
Conference room. D B
(meeting)
Offices. D
(general and private)
Oher plan offices D B
(extensive VDT use )
Lobies, lounges, reception. C A
Corridor B
Kitchen E A
Dining C A
Toilet B. A
Exhibition hall C. A
Flat display on
vertical surfaces
Museum. D
General Gallery C. A
A-30 lux, B- 50 lux, C-100 lux, D-300 lux, E- 500 lux

Lighting Controls
Automatic light shut off and space controls, The GBC building is primarily an office-cum-
exhibition/meeting complex, which variable occupancy pattern. the occupancy trend in the
permanent technology centre, meeting room, seminar hall has been modelled as per
occupancy schedules provided by the client. Occupancy control devices instead of time
scheduling is felt to be the control option, as the time-of-day requirement for lighting may
vary. The task lighting used in the permanent technology centre is used as display and accent
lighting which is Essential function performed in the area and is considered exempt from
calculation of interior lighting Clause S 9.3.1 of ASHRAE 90.1-1999 Users' Manual.
Separate switching control is provided for the same.
Light power density: Installed Lighting power calculation by space by space method
Since the GBC building has multifunctional usage, hence space by space method has been
adopted to determine the lighting power allowance.The lighting power density, which have
been adopted for the GBC building as a mandatory compliance and to quantify savings are as
follows:

AREA DEFINITION AS LPD [W/SQFT BASE CORRESPONDING


PER ASHRAE 90.1- CASE] LPD [ W/SQFT GBC AREA
2001,TABLE 93.12 PROPOSED CASE]
OPEN PLAN OFFICE 1.3 OPEN PLAN OFFICE
MEETING ROOM 1 & 2
CONFERENCE/MEETING 1.5 OPEN PLAN OFFICE
PURPOSES MEETING ROOM 1 & 2
CLASSROOM/TRAINING 1.6 SEMINAR ROOM
LOBBY 1.8 RECEPTION / LOBBY
FOOD PREPERATION 2.2 KITCHEN
RESTROOMS 1 RESTROOMS
CONVENTION CENTRE 3.3 PERMANENT
EXHIBITION SPACE TECHNOLOGY
CENTRE
CORRIDORS 0.7 CORRIDOR
ELECTRICAL/ 1.3 AHU / PLANT ROOM
MECHANICAL
OFFICE ENCLOSED 1.5 CABINS IN OFFICE

As per the 9.3.1.2 of the ASHRAE 90.1-1999 Users' Manual clause 9.3.1.2.1, additional
interior lighting power of 1.0 W/Ft is allowed for decorative wall scones, chandeliers type
luminaires and lighting to highlight art or special building feature. .
HVAC systems
The HVAC Systems for the project have been conceptualized acceptable design standards
laid down by ASHRAE & LEED to achieve highest LEED certification. documented for
records. Operating staff shall be provided with instructions manual for proper operational use
of systems and equipment.

I. HVAC SYSTEM
Duct construction standards as per revelent BIS codes ,air filters as per ASHRAE Standard
52.1-1992, Indoor air quality as per ASHRAE standard 62 – 1999
Motor , cabling , wiring and accessories as per BIS codes.

BASIS OF DESIGN :
INTRODUCTION : A central HVAC system shall be designed to provide year round
thermal environmental control for the GBC at Hyderabad.
OUTDOOR DESIGN CONDITIONS : Weather data file wedco, which has been jointly
compiled by TERI & ISHRAE has been refered for creating A/C load profile by TERI. the
weather data file is attached as annexure to the report .

INDOOR DESIGN CONDITIONS

Indoor Design Conditions :Inside conditions considered for occupied areas are as follows:
General Office
DB:24 + 1 Deg C (75 +2 Deg F)
RH: Less than 60%
Design Parameters
Chiller:
Performance rating of the chilling machine shall be based on following design parameters:
Temperature of chilled water entering chiller:54 deg F (12.2 deg C)
Temperature of chilled water leaving chiller :44 deg F (6.6 deg C)
Fouling factor for chiller in FPS unit :0.0005
temperature of condenser water entering Condenser :85 deg F (29.5 deg C)
Temperature of condenser water leaving Condenser : 95 deg F (35 deg C)
Fouling factor for condenser in FPS unit: 0.001
Refrigerant for chilling machine 0.001 : R-134A
minimum COP for chilling machine at ARI Conditions :4.45

Design parameters for selection of air handling unit and its components shall be:
Maximum face velocity across filters : 100M/min
Maximum face velocity across cooling coils :150M/Min
Maximum fan outlet velocity : 550M/Min
Maximum fan speed : 1000 RPM
Maximum fan motor speed : 1450 RPM

Piping shall be sized for the following design parameters Maximum velocity : 2.5 M/sec
Maximum friction: 5M/100 M Run

3.4 Design parameter for duct design shall be :


Maximum flow velocity : 450 M/Min
Maximum friction : 1cm WG / 100 M Run
Maximum velocity at supply air outlet :150 M/ Min.

TOTAL A/C LOAD


(as determined by DOE 2.1E simulation results) : 64.5 TR SAY :65 TR
Diversity @95%: 62 TR
Machine Selected : 1 No. 62 TR Screw Chilling Machine .

Electrical System
Source Of Power Supply
Based on our past experience in Hyderabad city power supply for our requirement is expected
to be available at 11 KV HT. Metering by the city shall be carried out at the entry gate in the
driveway. In addition, 20 KW solar power is expected to be generated in-house through
photo-voltaic cells.
Distribution
11 KV High voltage panel (VCB) shall receive the mains power from the metering panel and
feed to 1 No, 200 KVA 11/0.433 KV, 3 phase, 50 cycles oil cooled, step down outdoor
transformer.
Transformer shall be copper wound and connections shall be delta on high voltage side and
star on low voltage side with neutral terminal brought out for solid earthing (grounding)
corresponding to the vector symbol DYN-11. OFF load tap change on HV side shall be
provided for the standard variation from (+)2.5% to ()7.5% in five steps of 2.5% each. The
magnetic core shall be made up of cold rolled, grain oriented, low-loss steel stampings.
Lt Power Distribution
Due to wide voltage fluctuations encountered in Andhra Pradesh, LT voltage stabilizer shall
be provided on-line down-stream of the transformer, with manual by-pass arrangement to
facilitate maintenance. The stabilizer shall be located on ground floor. Power from the voltage
stabilizer shall be brought to LT panel located on ground floor. In addition, er from solar
photo-voltaic cells shall also be received at the LI panel. Further distribution from panel to
the various areas / facilities shall be carried out through a network of PVC insulated,
Aluminium conductor. armoured cables of 1100 volts grade insulation. Aluminium bus bar
shall be provided for all power distribution panels and for all motor control centres. panel
shall supply power to Main Distribution Board (MDB), Sub Distribution Boards (SDB's) and
tal Distribution Boards (FDB's) located on area basis.

PROPOSED BUDGET PROPOSE


ENERG BUILDING BUILDING D/BUDGET
END USE Y TYPE ENER PEAK [ 10 ENER PEAK ENERGY
GY CU BTU / GY [ 10 CU %
[KWH] H ] [KWH BTU / H ]
]
LIGHTING- ELECTR 7036 68.92 46772 68.92 15%
CONDITION ICITY
ED
LIGHTING - 3120 20.47 3120 20.47 1%
UNCONDITI
ONED
SPACE NONE
HEATING
[1]
SPACE NONE
HEATING
[2]
SPACE ELECTR 131451 187.32 227617 344.612 58%
COOLING ICITY
PUMPS 5737 13.98 10469 37.19 55%
HEAT 28764 34.8 -
REJECTION
FANS- 9710 25.59 13216 40.94 73.50%
INTERIOR
VENTILATI
ON
TOTAL 185818 351.08x 10 301194 512.132X
BUILDING cu BTU/h 10 Cu btu/
CONSUMPT h
ION

ENERGY SUMMARY BY END USE [ REGULATED LOADS ONLY ]

REGULATED – ENERGY SUMMARY BY END USE

PROPOSED BUDGET
BUILDING BUILDING
ENERGY COST ENERGY COST
[ kWh ] [RS ] [kWh] [ RS ]
ELECTRICITY 185818 929090 301194 1505970
SOLAR OR SITE -
-28000 0 0
RECOVERED 140000
TOTAL
INCLUDING 157818 789090 301199 1505970
SOLAR

ENERGY SUMMARY BY END USE [ NON REGULATED LOADS ONLY ]

PROPOSED BUDGET
BUILDING BUILDING
ENERGY COST ENERGY COST
[ kWh ] [RS ] [kWh] [ RS ]

ELECTRICITY 77292 386460 77292 386460

TOTAL
INCLUDING 77292 386460 77292 386460
SOLAR

NON REGULATED ENERGY SUMMARY BY END USE


% SAVINGS = 100 X (15,05,970 – 789090 ) / 15,05,970B = 47.6%
%RENEWABLES = 100 X 1,40,000/7,89,900 = 17.7%
Unconditioned lighting 6Kw @ 50% For 4 hours / working day
From the above calculations it shows that the energy saving percentage is 47.6% in that
renewable energy percentage is 17.7% so it meets the requirement present in criteria to
achieve the maximum points of this credit.
CONCLUSION : as per provided data this building can earn the points of this credit

EA CREDIT 2 :ON SITE RENEWABLE ENERGY [ 1-3 POINTS ]


INTENT : ENCOURAGE AND RECOGNIZE INCREASING LEVELS OF ON SITE
RENEWABLE ENERGY SELF SUPPLY IN ORDER TO REDUCE ENVIRONMENTAL
AND ECONOMIC IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH FOSSIL FUEL ENERGY USE.
REQUIREMENTS : Use on-site renewable energy systems to offset building energy cost.
Calculate project performance by expressing the energy produced by the renewable systems
as a percentage of the building annual energy cost and using the table below to determine the
number of points achieved. Use the building annual energy cost calculated in EA Credit 1 or
use the Department of Energy (DOE) Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey
(CBECS) database to determine the estimated electricity use.
(Table of use for different building types is provided in the Reference Guide.)
% Renewable Energy Points
2.5% - 1
7.5% - 2
12.5% - 3
EXPLANATION :
CALCULATION :
ENERGY USAGE TABLE

PROPOSED BUDGET
BUILDING BUILDING
ENERGY COST ENERGY COST
[ kWh ] [RS ] [kWh] [ RS ]

ELECTRICITY 77292 386460 77292 386460

TOTAL
INCLUDING 77292 386460 77292 386460
SOLAR
ENERGY SUMMARY BY END USE
% SAVINGS = 100 X (15,05,970 – 789090 ) / 15,05,970B = 47.6%
%RENEWABLES = 100 X 1,40,000/7,89,900 = 17.7%
Unconditioned lighting 6Kw @ 50% For 4 hours / working day
From the above calculations it concluded that the renewable energy source in CII GBC solar
photovoltaic systems provides more than 12.5% of energy for needs in the building.
A roof mounted 20kWp solar photovoltaic systems is proposed to provide 28000 kWh units
of electricity. The ECB compliance form as attached shows that the percent renewables as
calculated based on equation 1 of the LEED’s reference guide 2.0 is 17.7%.
CONCLUSION: as per provided data the building can earn the points of this credit. As the
percentage of renewables is 17.7%>12.5%.

EA CREDIT 3 : ENHANCED COMISSIONING [ I POINT ]


INTENT : BEGIN THE COMISSIONING PROCESS EARLY DURING THE DESIGN
PROCESS AND EXECUTE ADDITIONAL ACTIVITIES AFTER SYSTEMS
PERFORMANCE VERIFICATION IS COMPLETED.
EXPLANATION :
OWNER : CII/GODREJ
ARCHITECT : KARAN GROVER ASSOCIATES
COMISSIONING AUTHORITY ; C.R. NARAYANA RAO ARCHITECTS AND
ENGINEERS.
Other strategic partners are :
DISCIPLINE
A. root zone treatment systems
STRATEGIC PARTNERS :GODREJ
COORDINATION/TERMINATION
i. inlet of sullage connection
ii. power to electro-mechanical equipment
iii storage of treated effluent.

B. Drip irrigation
STRATEGICPARTNERS : HARVEL/RAINBIRD
COORDINATION/TERMINATION
i. availability of irrigation water
ii. power to electro mechanical equipment

C. Sanitary fixtures
STRATEGICPARTNERS:
PARRYWARE/HINDUSTAN
COORDINATION/TERMINATION
i. fixing of selected fixture
ii. water supply to the selected fixture
iii. disposal of sullage & waste from fixture

D. water chilling machines


STRATEGIC PARTNERS : TRANE
COORDINATION/TERMINATION
i. power to machines
ii. chilled & condensing water pipe connections

E. building automation & Fire alarm


STRATEGIC PARTNERS :Johnson control india

COORDINATION/TERMINATION
i. no volt contact in HVAC/ELEC/PLUM Systems

ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONING
To ensure that the building is designed, constructed and calibrated to operate as intended.
Requirements and procedures:
7. Focused review of design prior to construction documents.
8. Focused review of construction documents prior to completion.
9. Selective review of contractor submittals for commissioned equipment.
10. Prepare a recommissioning management manual.
11. Implement a contract for near warranty end or post occupancy review.
12. Provide signed certifications for above tasks.
Documents under review (provided by KGA)
9. Site Plan
10. Floor Plans
11. Sections and Elevations
12. HVAC System Layout.
13. Toilet Details
14. Design Basis and Area statements.
15. Services Report
16. Landscape Report.

CONSTRUCTION IAQ MANAGEMENT PLAN

Prevent Indoor Air Quality problems arising out of construction and sustain long term
occupant health and comfort.
Requirements:
3. Meet or exceed the minimum requirements of the SMACNA IAQ Guideline 1995, and
protect on site material from moisture damage and replace filtration media prior to
occupancy. Filtration Media should have. a "Minimum Efficiency Reporting Value (MERV)"
as determined by ASHRAE 52.2-1999.
4. Conduct a two week (minimum) building flush out with new media at 100% outside air
after construction ends prior to occupancy or conduct a baseline indoor air quality testing
procedure based on current EPA Protocol for Environmental Requirements, Baseline IAQ and
Materials.
Procedures:
3. Contractor to implement a construction IAQ Management Plan after approval by
Commissioning Authority. The Plan should address HVAC protection, source control,
pathway interruption, housekeeping and scheduling. Submit a copy of the plan to the
Commissioning Authority to review; provide photographs showing construction IAQ
management procedures; provide cut sheets of filtration media with MERV values
highlighted.
4. Indicate actual dates of building flush out and flushing procedures with approval by
Commissioning Authority.
CONCLUSION : as per provided data the building can earn the points of this credit.
EA CREDIT 4 : ENHANCED REFRIGERANT MANAGEMENT [ 1
POINT ]
INTENT : REDUCE OZONE DEPLETION AND SUPPORT EARLY COMPLIANCE
WITH MONTREAL PROTOCOL WHILE MINIMIZING DIRECT CONTRIBUTIONS TO
GLOBAL WARMING.
REQUIREMENT : Install base building level HVAC and refrigeration equipment and fire
suppression systems that do not contain HCFC’S or Halon.
EXPLANATION :
The air conditioning system being designed for the building consists of 60 TR water cooled
chilling machine employing R-134a HFC refrigerant. No other refrigeration equipment is
proposed to be installed within the building.
All fire extinguishers proposed in the building shall also be free of HCFC's and Ralon
Following type of extinguishers shall be used

TABLE DESCRIPTION ABOUT THE EXTINGUISHER SYSTEMS IN CII GBC

SNO DESCRIPTION OF EXTINGUISHER


PLACE OF INSTALLATION
1. TWO NOS 2 KG DCP EXTINGUISHERS
SUB STATION AREA
2. TWO NOS 2 KG DCP EXTINGUISHERS
LT PANEL ROOM
3. TWO NOS 2 KG DCP EXTINGUISHERS
DG SET
4. TOTAL 4 NOS 5KG DCP EXTINGUISHERS
PLANT ROOM
5. ONE NO. 5 KG DCP EXTINGUISHER
AT EACH AHU ROOM
6. ABC[POWDER TYPE] OF 2KG CAPACITY
FOR EVERY 250 SQM [APPROX]
FIGURE : LETTER STATING THE USE OF R134a Refrigerant In CII GBC
CONCLUSION : as per provided data the building can the points of this credit, as they
satisfy the requirements of this credit.
MATERIAL AND
REUSE CHOICES

MATERIALS AND RESOURCES


MR CREDIT 2.1 : CONSTRUCTION WASTE MANAGEMNT :
DIVERT 50% FROM DISPOSAL.
INTENT : DIVERT CONSTRUCTION , DEMOLITION AND LAND CLEARING
DEBRIS FROM DISPOSAL IN LANDFILLS AND INCINERATORS.REDIRECT
RECYCLABLE RECOVERED RESOURCES BACK TO THE MANUFACTURING
PROCESS. REDIRECT REUSABLE MATERIALS TO APPROPRIATE SITES.
REQUIREMENT : develop and implement a waste management plan quantifying material
diversion by weight. Recycle and / or salvage at least 50% [by weight] of construction,
demolition and land clearing waste.
EXPLANATION : CAD drawing [MR 2.1 2.2] represents the plinth of the building which
will accommodate the most of excavated earth and rocks in the forms of filling
SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT FOR SITE AND CONSTRUCTION
WASTE MANAGEMENT :
1. contractor approved [ design & materials ] boundaries/ barricades around the site as per
following requirement. The contractor shall not dump/ or stack materials, equipment and
excavated soil or disturb the site in any more.
i. 40 feet beyond the building perimeter.
ii. 5 feet beyond primary roadway curbs , walkways and main utility branch trenches.
iii. 25 feet beyond previous paving areas that require additional staging areas in order to limit
compaction in the paved areas.
2. contractor made necessary storage facilities for the materials collected on site which
require to be recycled / salvages.
3. proper records of materials which are used after recycling / salvaging contractor provided
calculations on end of project , recycling rates , salvage rates and landfill rates demonstrating
that 50% of construction wastes were recycled or salvaged.
Use of construction waste :
Amount of earth excavated during the construction process used within the site itself, in form
of foundation and plinth filling
CALCULATION :
Quantity of excavated earth = 25578 CU.FT
In Foundation Filling = 15346 CU.FT
In Plinth Filling = 7761 CU.FT
In Road Filling = 3000 CU.FT
TOTAL QUANTITY = 26109 CU.FT
CONCLUSION : as per provided data the building can earn the points of this credit.

MR CREDIT 3.1 : MATERIALS REUSE : 5% [ 1 POINT ]


INTENT: REUSE BUILDING MATERIALS AND PRODUCTS IN ORDER TO REUCE
DEMAND FOR VIRIGIN MATERIALS AND TO REDUCE WASTE THEREBY
REDUCING IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE EXTRACTION AND PROCESSING
OF VIRGIN RESOURCES.
REQUIREMENTS : Specify salvaged or refurbished materials for 5% of building materials.
EXPLANATION :
SALVAGE RATE % = SALVAGED MATERIAL COST [RS.] / TOTAL MATERIALS COST
[RS.] = 859,425.85/161,27,996.82
= 5.33% > 5.00% [ REQUIREMENT ].
LIST OF SALVAGED MATERIALS
1. CHINA MOSAIC TILES
2. PVC PIPE SLEEVES
3. GI PIPE SLEEVES
4. STRUCTURAL STEEL ANGLES
5. STRUCTURAL STEEL PLATES
6. STRUCTURAL STEEL HOLLOW TUBULAR SECTIONS.
CONCLUSION : as per provided data the building can earn the points of this credit as reuse
rate is more than 5% i.e 5.33%

MR CREDIT 4.1 : RECYCLED CONTENT : 10% [ POST-


CONSUMER + ½ PRE-CONSUMER]
[ 1 POINT ]
INTENT : INCREASE DEMAND FOR BUILDING PRODUCTS THAT INCORPARATE
RECYCLED CONTENT MATERIALS, THERE BY REDUCING IMPACTS RESULTING
FROM EXTRACTION AND PROCESSING OF VIRGIN MATERIALS.
REQUIREMENTS : specify a minimum of 25% of building materials that contain in a
aggregate a minimum of 20% post-consumer recycled content material, OR a minimum
weighted average of 40% industrial recycled content material.
EXPLANATION :
RECYCLED CONTENTS RATE
= RECYCLED CONTENT VALUE [Rs.] / TOTAL MATERIALS COST [Rs.]
= 753,47,353.19/161,27,997.32 X 100
= 33.15% > 25% [ REQUIREMENT ]
HOLLOW FLY ASH / CEMENT BLOCKS – 8” THICK [ 1 block consumes 35 kg of mortar
mix ]

RECYCLE
S CONCRETE PERCENTAG
WEIGH D
NO COMPONENT E BY
T [LBS] CONTENT
. S WEIGHT [%]
[%]

1 WATER 11.02 5
2 CEMENT 11.02 5
3 FLY ASH 44.08 100% 20
4 GYPSUM 2.2 1
5 LIME 15.43 7
QUARRY
6 50.69 100% 23
DUST
6MM COARSE
7 85.96 39
AGGREGATES
220.4 100

CONCLUSION : as per provided data the building can achieve the points of this credit as
the recycled content rate exceeds 25% i.e 33.15%.

MR CREDIT 5.1 : REGIONAL MATERIALS : 10% EXTRACTED ,


PROCESSED AND MANUFACTURED REGIONALLY
[ 1 POINT ]
INTENT : INCREASE DEMAND FOR BUILDING AMTERIALS AND PRODUCTS
THAT ARE EXTRACTED AND MANUFACTURED WITHIN THE REGION THERE BY
SUPPORTING THE USE OF INDIGENOUS RESOURCES AND REDUCING THE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS RESULTING FROM TRANSPORTATION.
REQUIREMENTS : specify a minimum of 20% of building materials that are
manufactured are regionally within the radius of 500 miles.

MR CREDIT 5.2 : REGIONAL MATERIALS : 20% EXTRACTED,


PROCESSED & MANUFACTURED REGIONALLY
[ 1 POINT IN ADDITION TO MR CREDIT 5.1]
INTENT : INCREASE DEMAND FOR BUILDING MATERIALS AND PRODUCTS
THAT ARE EXTRACTED AND MANUFACTURED WITHIN THE REGION THEREBY
SUPPORTING THE USE OF INDIGENOUS RESOURCES AND REDUCING THE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS RESULTING FROM TRANSPORTATION.
REQUIREMENTS :of these regionally materials specify that a minimum of 50% that rae
extracted, harvested, recovered within 500 miles.
EXPLANATION :
CREDIT 5.1 [ I POINT ] LOCAL / REGIONAL MANUFACTURING RATE %
= LOCAL / REGIONAL MANUFACTURING COST [Rs.]/
TOTAL MATERIALS COST [Rs.]
= 1,20,05,149.90 X 100 / 1,61,27,996 = 82
= 74.43% > 20% [ REQUIREMNT ]
CREDIT 5.2 [ 1 POINT ]
LOCAL / REGIONAL EXTRACTION RATE %
= LOCAL / REGIONAL EXTRACTION COST [Rs.]/ LOCAL /
REGIONAL MANUFACTURING COST [Rs.]
= 66,09,400.83 X 100 / 1,20,05,149.90
= 55.05% > 50% [ REQUIREMENT ]

S.NO DESCRITION AVALIABILITY FROM THE SITE


within 500 miles radius from project
1 CEMENT
site
within 500 miles radius from project
2 SAND
site
within 500 miles radius from project
3 METAL 20MM
site
within 500 miles radius from project
4 MS/ TOR REINFORCEMENT
site
within 500 miles radius from project
5 AEROCON BLOCKS
site
within 500 miles radius from project
6 BRICKS
site
within 500 miles radius from project
7 KOTA STONE
site
within 500 miles radius from project
8 D P KOTA STONE
site
within 500 miles radius from project
9 GRANITE SLABS
site
within 500 miles radius from project
10 CERAMIC TILES
site
11 SAND STONE within 500 miles radius from project
site
within 500 miles radius from project
12 CHINA MOSAIC
site
within 500 miles radius from project
13 MS PLATES
site
within 500 miles radius from project
14 STRUCTURAL STEELS, ANGLES, PLATES ETC
site
within 500 miles radius from project
15 STURATURAL STEEL - HOLLOW SECTIONS
site
within 500 miles radius from project
16 UNDERDECK INSULATION
site
within 500 miles radius from project
17 FALSE CEILING
site

TABLE SHOWS LOCAL MATERIALS AND THEIR AVALIABILITY


CONCLUSION : as per provided data the building can the points of these credits, as the
materials used are available within the radius of 500 miles from the site.

ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION
the CII – Sohrabji Godrej Green Business Centre (CII GBC), a division
of Confederation of Indian Industry (CII). Located in Hyderabad, the
CII is India’s premier developmental institution, offering advisory
services to the industry on environmental aspects and working in the
areas of Green Buildings, Energy Efficiency, Water Management,
Environment Management, Renewable Energy, Green Business
Incubation and Climate Change activities. The LEED Platinum for
New Construction (NC) v 2.0 certified CII – Godrej GBC building is
also home to India’s first and largest built greenroof (2003).
represents a successful model of public-private partnership between the
Government of Andhra Pradesh [Present CII GBC is in Telangana], the
Pirojsha Godrej Foundation and the CII, with technical support from
the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).
CII-Sohrabji Godrej announced itself as a ‘Net-Zero Energy’
Platinum-rated building, with the goal of improving year after year;
making it a great study model due to its design philosophies, use (and
re-use) of materials as well as energy efficiency techniques.
The

Green Business Centre earned a LEED rating of 56 credits and became


certified LEED Platinum for New Construction (NC) v 2.0 back in 2003 –
the first in the country, and the first outside of the United Sates. Among
many other features, vegetated roofs coat 55-60% of the building’s roofs,
and the remainder of the roof is covered by solar panels with a 24 KW
capacity. The 100-120 units of power generated every day is fed into the
grid, thus satisfying roughly 20% of the total energy cost of the building.
The property produces a 50% saving in overall energy consumption,
35% reduction in potable water consumption and usage of 80% of
recycled material. And most importantly – CII-Sohrabji Godrej sparked
the widespread green building movement in India. In 2000, the Indian
Green Building Council (IGBC) – part of CII-Godrej Green Business
Centre – and created its own LEED ® Green Building Standard by fine-
tuning the ratings to reflect Indian conditions and priorities .

LEED CERTIFICATION [ PLATINUM ] IGBC CERTIFICATION


CASE STUDY ANALYSIS
Case study site : CII SOHRABJI GODREJ GREEN BUSINESS CENTRE
Date : 07-09-2023
Guided by : Ms. Rekha Mam

NARRATIVE :
 CII – CONFERDERATION OF INDIAN INDUSTRY.
 CII GBC was construction completed in 2004 july.
 Got trained by USGBC for green building initiatives and practices.
 Certified as LEED PLATINUM rated building by USGBC.
 Building has solar panel systems which generates 20kW capacity.
 Solar power system it is connected to power grid.
 CII GBC has a number of 100 members of staff working here.
 Total land area is 5 acres in which 3 acres are undisturbed for preservation of
ecosystem and environmental conditions.
 During and after construction they have kept the efforts for more vegetation in site.
Vegetation enhances the microclimate.
 They have good ecosystem for 25+ types of butterflies and 30+ types of birds that
have been visiting the site.
 Site has been maintaining good biodiversity even it is in urban region.
 Heat island effect is also reduced by the help of vegetation in the site.
 In parking area the heat island effect is reduced by providing tree shade.
 In roof area the heat island effect is reduced by usage of roof garden, High SRI paints.
 In CII GBC as roof are covered by most of solar panels so high SRI paints are used on
roof area where solar panels are present.
 And roof gardens are also provided. SRI Paints reflect heat and doesn’t allow the heat
to pass through roofs.
 The building is in circular shape because of high heat transfer from both south and
west direction.
 Central courtyards, pocket of opening spaces allowing daylight and ventilation into
indoors.
BIRDS AND BUTTERFLIES
SPOTTED IN CII GBC

TREE SHADE PROVIDED AT PARKING AREA


COURTYARDS
 North east direction
receives less heat as per energy simulation performed for CII GBC before
construction.
 In terms of energy, heat energy get transferred from roofs, walls, windows. Where
window glasses radiates heat
 As we are in tropical country where south and west receive more heat so these places
contain less glass openings provided.
 So North light is used has low glare 17 degree slope has taken to match the latitude of
Hyderabad where it pass great amount of daylighting .Most of the time day lighting is
used.
 Double glazed glass is used as they have inert gas in them which has low U value as
they reduce heat transfer and radiation.
 Aerocon bricks which are fly ash bricks used in the construction. They contain air
pores which reduces heat transfer.
 Fly ash brick is good sustainable building material. Before in past time only 17% of
fly ash is used for making blocks and now nearly 70% of fly ash is recyclable.

FLY ASH BRICKS


GLASS OPENINGS THAT ALLOWS NORTH LIGHT

 Water cooled chillers are used in CII GBC


 Wind towers are passive system which naturally cools the building.
 Lighting used here are LED systems Before CFL are used.

MINIATURE MODEL

WIND TOWER
 Refrigerant that is used has minimal effects on environment, has no impact on ozone
layer.
 RECHARGE – 8 lakh litre pond is present , site has collecting pits and natural drains
where they are inter linked to rain water harvesting pond.
 REDUCE- water fixtures need to be efficient here in male washrooms waterless
urinals are used these water less urinals contains blue seal liquid which has high g
value. It pulls the wate to th drain and doesn’t release any bad smells. Need to get
change it for every 5-6 months, and water fixtures which are used here are low-flow
fixtures.
 In conventional use where there are 3/6 fixtures used but here 2/4 fixtures are used jut
by usage of low flow fixtures in green building a person water consumption gets
highly reduced upto 12-15 litres per day. Taps also has aerators fixed for low flow.
 RECYCLE- Biologically wastewater treatment methods are used where treated water
is used for gardening purposes.
 LOW VOC paints are used
 Fire hydrant system is used for fire fighting purposes in this building.
 In terms of water conservation native plants are used they use less water 1000+
species are planted.
 In terms of material usage RECYCLE- reduce the use of virgin materials ,use
materials like fly ash bricks , REUSE – salvaged materials [ tiles, furniture ],
REGIONAL – they are locally available materials, good availability, less
transportation cost.

FURNITURE MADE UP OF
SUGAR CANE BASED WOOD
[ BAGASSE]

WATER LESS URINAL


SALVAGED FURNITURE
 BAGASSE Wood is sugarcane based wood it is not pure wood, it is composite wood
material and it is rapidly renewable material.
 Vertical gardening has patches of perlite based soil and cocopit which has high
mineral content for plant growth they act as vertical curtains which act as sound
barriers and reduce heat transfer.
 Soil erosion is controlled by grid pavement system. They have these grip pavment
systems throughout the lawn area.

VERTICAL GARDENING
GRID PAVEMENT SYSTEM
 in conventional usage we see STP but
here the waste water is treated in a
biological method which is called phytoremediation
 use of plants for treatment they use specific wetland plants which leaves oxygen from
roots.
 From septic tanks where water is free from sediments at filtration pond where it has
aggregates and passes through the roots of plants so it will be free from micro
organisms then it is passes to polishing pond then go to underground sump.
 Water is passed from pit by pit by gravitational force.
 No power required like for conventional STP.
 Contains butterfly garden it is active as they are nectar and host trees present in the
site
 Swales are the natural drains where the water get collected and sent to water
harvesting pit.
 In pond aeration occurs by fountains which prevents the formation of algae.
 In wind tower Aerocon bricks are used as they have good thermal resistance.
 3-5 degrees of temperature can be dropped by wind tower .
 Fresh air is taken from outside and the air is cooled and it is sent into the building.
 Pavement systems used here are porous concrete pavers.
 Drains are available outdoors they connect directly to pit

RAIN WATER DRAIN

COLLECTION PIT

DRAIN LINES

AERATION
FOUNTAIN
COLLECTION POND
VERTICAL PLANTED SOLAR
PANEL

PHYTOREMEDIATION SYSTEM

 Most of the indoors are exposed to daylighting conditions.


 Having exposure to outdoor environment.
 Low VOC materials in paints, furniture and low chemical based eco friendly
house keeping materials are used.

CASE STUDY PICTURES


IMPROVEMENTS
 CII GBC is net zero energy building.
 Where net zero has different types they are energy , water, carbon emission,
wastes.
 As of now it is a green building and as net zero building in terms of energy.
 CII has established IGBC in 2001.
 From 2007 Projects are certified by IGBC.
 Solar panels are used here are bifacial solar panels , they are transparent and
805 more efficient than conventional type panels.
 Their speciality is they can absorb the solar energy from bottom part also.
 Placed 1 ½ metre above the roof level
 They got updated in 2019
 138 kw of solar power generation has made CII GBC as net zero energy
building in terms of energy.
 Lighting used here are LED systems before CFL are used.
 Root zone treatment system got replaced by phytoremediation as the pipes are
getting blocked by sand accumulation.

CONCLUSION
In conclusion, the CII Sohrabji Godrej Green Business Centre stands as a
remarkable exemplar of sustainable architecture and environmentally
conscious practices. The incorporation of sustainable building features,
such as passive solar design, energy-efficient systems, and green roofs,
showcases a commitment to reducing the environmental impact of the
facility. Furthermore, the water consumption analysis and energy
consumption analysis underscore the centre’s dedication to resource
efficiency. By effectively managing water and energy resources, the centre
not only reduces operational costs but also minimizes its ecological
footprint. The emphasis on material selection and reuse purposes also
aligns with the principles of sustainability, promoting the responsible use
of resources. However, there remains room for improvement in terms of
optimizing water and energy usage further and exploring innovative
materials and technologies. In conclusion, the CII Sohrabji Godrej Green
Business Centre serves as a noteworthy case study, illustrating how
sustainable building practices can be effectively integrated into
commercial facilities, while also inspiring us to continue pushing the
boundaries of sustainable design and resource conservation in the future.
SITE PLAN

REFERENCES

 LEED for New construction v2.0


 CII GBC’s LEED submission modules.

You might also like