Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Report
Report
GREEN_COMPUTING_rm_paper[1][1]
by Code More
General metrics
19,196 2,713 209 10 min 51 sec 20 min 52 sec
characters words sentences reading speaking
time time
88 79 79
Issues left Critical Advanced
Sentence Length 13
Measures average sentence length words per sentence
GREEN_COMPUTING_rm_paper[1][1]
PROCRASTINATION
Prathyush SG, Shashank MS, Punith V, Srinidhi Pujar
Vivekananda Institute of Technology, Bangalore
INTRODUCTION
Procrastination, a term we're all too familiar with, is the act of delaying or
postponing tasks or actions. Often viewed negatively, it's a common
phenomenon that affects people across all walks of life.
The roots of procrastination are complex. It's not just about laziness or poor
time management, but also involves psychological factors like fear of failure,
perfectionism, and low self-efficacy. It's a battle between the present self, who
prefers immediate gratification, and the future self, who values long-term
rewards. Procrastination can lead to stress, guilt, and the loss of productivity.
It can also lead to missed opportunities and feelings of regret. However, not all
procrastination is harmful. 'Beneficial procrastination' can provide time for
reflection, creativity, and strategic planning. Understanding and acknowledging
one's procrastination patterns is the first step toward overcoming them.
Various strategies like time management techniques, setting realistic goals,
mindfulness, and seeking professional help can be effective in combating
procrastination.
Remember, everyone, procrastinates to some extent, but it's the degree and
frequency of procrastination that determines its impact on our life
SURVEY ON PROCRASTINATION
Most research has focused on students and has covered topics like definition,
classification, antecedents, consequences, and interventions related to
procrastination. However, procrastination in diverse contexts and groups
remains underexplored. While personality differences (such as the five-factor
model, temperament, character, emotional intelligence, and impulsivity) have
been studied, external factors like task characteristics and environmental
conditions have received less attention. Randomized controlled trials are
commonly used, but reliance on self-reported data and limited longitudinal
designs pose challenges in validation. Procrastination, often viewed as the
thief of time, is the act of delaying or postponing tasks. Despite its universal
prevalence, it is a habit that can lead to a multitude of negative consequences.
TYPES
Perfectionist Procrastinator:
Issue: High standards and fear of not meeting expectations.
Behavior: They put off work because they fear they won't do it correctly.
Dreamer Procrastinator:
Issue: Big goals but no concrete plan for success.
Behavior: Envisions grand outcomes but lacks practical steps to achieve them.
Worrier Procrastinator:
Issue: Fear of change and worst-case scenario thinking.
Behavior: Resists risk-taking and avoids unfamiliar situations.
Deifier Procrastinator:
Issue: Promise-maker with poor follow-through.
Behaviour: Offers excuses or reasons for not doing the task
CAUSES OF PROCRASTINATION
. Lack of motivation Motivation is the driving force behind our actions,
influencing our behavior, goals, and overall well-being. However, there are
times when we experience a lack of motivation. External Pressure: When we
feel pressured by external expectations—such as academic performance, work
deadlines, or societal norms—we may lose motivation. The fear of failure or
disappointing others can be overwhelming.
Lack of Clarity: Unclear goals or a vague sense of purpose can lead to
demotivation. Without a clear direction, it's challenging to stay motivated.
Monotony and Routine: Repetitive tasks or a monotonous routine can drain our
enthusiasm. A lack of novelty can make us lose interest.
Burnout: Excessive stress, long hours, and constant demands can lead to
burnout. When we're mentally and physically exhausted, motivation wanes.
Negative Self-Talk: Our inner dialogue matters. If we constantly doubt
ourselves or focus on our shortcomings, motivation suffers.
Low self-confidence is characterized by a lack of belief in oneself and one's
abilities. People with low confidence often feel inadequate, unlovable, or
awkward. Negative self-talk becomes a constant companion, eroding their
sense of self-worth. Fear of making mistakes or disappointing others keeps
them from taking risks. They hesitate to assert themselves, fearing judgment or
rejection. Low confidence affects relationships, work, and overall well-being.
Celebrating small victories becomes challenging, as self-doubt lingers.
Building self-esteem involves practicing self-care, positive affirmations, and
focusing on the positives. Recognizing signs of low confidence is crucial for
personal growth. It signifies trust in one's abilities to achieve goals. Positive
attitudes from parents, peers, and teachers foster self-confidence, while
negative attitudes hinder it. Self-confidence significantly influences academic
performance, learning, and overall success. Students with positive self-
confidence exhibit a realistic self-image, handle criticism effectively, and
approach challenges optimistically. Past successes play a crucial role in
developing self-confidence. It encourages risk-taking, the pursuit of novel
ideas, and the acquisition of new skills
Distraction is the process of diverting the attention of an individual or group
from a desired area of focus and thereby blocking or diminishing the reception
of desired information. Distraction is caused by: the lack of ability to pay
attention; lack of interest in the object of attention; or the great intensity,
EFFECTS ON ACADEMICS
For example student who has a week to study for an exam but ends up
cramming the night before, despite intending to start earlier.
Another example is a student who procrastinates working on an important
project until right before the deadline.
Other instances include wasting time on social media before starting
homework, delaying test preparation by doing unimportant chores, or
repeatedly postponing work on a thesis.
Students often report that procrastination occupies over a third of their daily
activities.
METHODOLOGY
Focus on your "why." Procrastinators focus more on short-term gains (avoiding
the distress associated with the task), as opposed to long-term results (the
stress of not doing it, as well as the consequences of avoiding this task).
Instead, try focusing on why you are doing this task: What are the benefits of
completing it?
If you've been putting off cleaning out a closet, imagine walking into the closet
when it is decluttered and how good that will feel. And consider how much
money you will make by selling the items on eBay, or how those in need will feel
when they receive these items as donations.
If it is an exercise program you have been avoiding, focus on how exercising will
help you have more positive energy, give you a boost of self-esteem, and serve
as a great role model for your children.
Get out of your calendar. Projects that will get done "when I have time" (as in "I
will do it when I have time") tend not to get done very often, if ever. You need to
schedule when you are going to work on a project and block out that time, just
as you would an important meeting. When it is time to do your work, set a timer
so you can be focused for the entire allotted time.
Be realistic. As you establish your schedule, set yourself up for success.
Projects often take much longer than expected, so bake in some extra time.
Look for ways to make it easier on yourself: If, for example, you are not a
morning person, don't expect yourself to get up an hour early to start the
exercise program you have put off for months. It might be better to schedule
that activity during lunch or before dinner.
Set Clear Goals: Begin by defining your objectives for the day. What tasks or
activities do you want to accomplish? Prioritize Tasks: Identify the most
important and urgent tasks. Focus on these first. Allocate Time Blocks: Divide
your day into chunks of time. Assign specific tasks to each block.
Include Breaks: Don't forget to schedule short breaks. They help maintain
productivity and prevent burnout. Be Realistic: Set achievable goals. Avoid
overloading your schedule. Time for Self-Care: Allocate time for exercise,
relaxation, and self-care. Use a Planner or App: Write down your schedule or
use a digital tool to keep track. Review and Adjust: Regularly assess your
progress and adjust your schedule as needed. Void Multitasking: Focus on one
task at a time to improve efficiency. Stick to It: Consistency is key. Follow your
schedule consistently to build good habits.
CONCLUSION
Distraction for students in this study derived both from a lack of satisfaction
with class stimuli and factors competing for their attention. When interest in
what is happening in class wanes, students easily find something else to
occupy their attention. Additionally, when another stimulus demands their
attention, students become distracted. The researchers identified three
overarching themes in the interview data describing sources of distraction and
engagement: social presence and social responsibility, effects on cognitive
load, and virtual and physical environments. Social presence. Findings from
this research are consistent with other studies suggesting that a majority of
students prefer in-person over remote classes because of the high salience of
social presence (Grieve et al., 2016; O'Neill et al., 2021). Interviewees
connected greater social presence with higher engagement; many expressed a
preference for in-person classes. This study provides a nuanced understanding
of how low social presence contributes to students violating typical social and
classroom norms, particularly attending to and being respectful of instructors
and other students. Similarly, the findings indicate that greater social presence
makes social accountability more salient and increases students' ability to
perform student roles and pay attention. This study also hints at the difficulty
for instructors in trying to simulate social presence in the synchronous remote
learning environment. Interviewees felt that some of the teaching methods
intended to create social presence were artificial or associated with grades,
rather than achieving the desired social connection. Cognitive load.
Environmental role strain, self-consciousness, and "Zoom fatigue" increased
cognitive load, putting non-academic issues into working memory and
interfering with the ability of students to attend to course content and
constructive interaction. Students in this study reported that they experienced
symptoms of role strain not because of their interpersonal roles with others,
but because of environmental factors. Compartmentalization, a method of
managing role strain by ignoring inconsistency, is more difficult when one is
limited to a certain physical environment in their classroom. Students found
themselves using a single physical environment to accommodate inconsistent
role obligations and as a result, experienced increased cognitive load. The
authors refer to this as environmental role strain, which contributes another
dimension to the theory of role strain developed by Goode (1960). Students had
mixed feelings about camera use, consistent with findings by Castelli and
Sarvary (2021). Many interviewees reported a loss of psychological safety when
cameras were on, but also believed that a camera requirement could improve a
sense of social presence. The findings here suggest that in attempting to create
a social presence by requiring cameras, instructors run the risk of negatively
affecting students' cognitive load. Finally, students reported suffering from
Zoom fatigue, which is consistent with Balinese (2021), who argues that
nonverbal overload and reduced mobility contribute to inability to engage
.
REFERENCES
Ginns, P., & Leppink, J. (2019). Special issue on cognitive load theory: Editorial.
Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 255–259.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09474-4 Goode, W. J. (1960). A theory of
role strain. American Sociological Review, 25(4), 483–496.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2092933 Grieve, R., Padgett, C. R., & Moffitt, R. L.
(2016). Assignments 2.0: The role of social presence and computer attitudes in
student preferences for online versus offline marking.
Jin, E., & Brown-Devlin, N. (2021). When others are here: The combinative
effects of social presence and threat appeals in climate change message
effectiveness. Mass Communication and Society,
https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2021.1910962
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self and Society (Vol. 111). University of Chicago
Press. Means, B., & Neisler, J. (2021). Teaching and Learning in the Time of
COVID: The Student Perspective. Online Learning, 25(1), 8–27. Mishler, E. G.
(1986). Research interviewing: Context and narrative. Harvard University Press.
O'Neill, K., Lopes, N., Nesbit, J., Reinhardt, S., & Jayasundera, K. (2021).
Modeling undergraduates' selection of course modality: A large sample, multi-
discipline study. The Internet and Higher Education, 48, 100776.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100776
Ramachandran, R., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2020). Student perspectives on remote
learning in a large organic chemistry lecture course. Journal of Chemical
Education, 97(9), 2565–2572. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00572