DIRECT REPORT’S NAME ROLE/POSITION

MARY JOY ROBLE INDUSTRIAL ENGINEER

DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE PERIOD
OPERATIONS EXCELLENCE 06/26/2023 – 02/15/2024
DEPARTMENT HEAD REVIEW DATE
WORK & DEVELOPMENT
02/15/24
PLAN
This form is to be completed by the direct report and the department head.

PART A: OVERALL PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT

(Prepared by the Department Head with inputs from Direct Report and other performance feedback providers. Indicates either one
of the following general assessment: OEE – Overall Exceeding Expectations or OME – Overall Meeting Expectations or OFE – Overall
Failing Expectations and provides explanations on the assessment. Refer to the Guidelines below.)

MARY JOY ROBLE (Signature over Printed Name of Direct Report)

o Overall exceeding expectations

o Overall meeting expectations
o Overall failing expectations
Supporting Statements:

We recommend MARY JOY ROBLE for regularization effective December 26, 2023.

We recommend a salary increase of _____% on her base pay.

Perf.
SLG D2D CEC COC TOT
Areas
Total
40% 30% 20% 10% 100%
Weight
Indiv. SLG SLG SLG D2D D2D D2D D2D D2D CEC CEC CEC
COC
Factor 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3
Indiv.
13.3% 13.3% 13.3% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.7% 6.7% 6.7% 10% 100%
Weight
Quali.
Rating
(EE, EE EE EE
ME,
FE)
Quant.
Rating
(120%, 120% 120% 120%
100%,
0%)
Final
15.96 15.96 15.96
Rating
 Guidelines Range SLG D2D CEC COC Remarks
All 3
Overall 2 of 3 must Must be To get OEE, all
Exceeding OEE 120%-114.7% must be 3 of 5 must be EE be ME ME or factors must be a
Expectations EE or better “Yes”
better
No
Overall No more To get OME, all
114.7%- more Must be
Meeting OME than 1 No more than 1 FE factors must be a
70.7% than ME
Expectations FE “Yes”
1 FE
Overall More More To get OFE, a
Must be
Failed OFE Below 70.7% than 1 More than 1 FE than “Yes” to just one
FE
Expectations FE 1 FE factor
PART B: DIRECT REPORT’S COMMENTS
Prepared by the Direct Report to reflect his or her own comments, if any, on the content of W&DP document.

PART C: FULL DOCUMENT SIGNATURES

Confirms that the W&DP has been reviewed and discussed by the Direct Report and Department Head. Any disagreements between
the direct report and department head have been addressed, and the direct report has been given an opportunity to explicitly
express it on the document and to attach additional comments.

MARY JOY ROBLE LLOYD INEZ ENGR. REY TABADA

_______________________ _______________________ _______________________
Direct Report Immediate Head/Supervisor Department Head

_______________________ _______________________ _______________________

Date Date Date
PART D: WORK PLAN & RESULTS REVIEW
Prepared by the Direct Report and revised as needed upon inputs of the Immediate Head/Department Head
D.2. DAY TOSTRATEGY
D.1. DAY OPERATIONAL WORK=PLAN
LINKED GOALS = 30%Weight
40% Total Total Weight
FINAL RATING
QUALI. RATING
DAY
SLGTO DAY (Top
(MUST BE 3)5) SUCCESS MEASURES RESULTS (Quant. x Ind.
(EE, ME, FE)
Weight)
(6.0%
(13.3%Ind.
Ind.Weight)
Weight) Confidently and
Able to
effectively
FINANCIAL Collect and gather data as accommodate
collects data as
PERSPECTIVE: As a new
input department with
for process multiple and
needed with ME 6
limited resources,
documentation be able varied
processtasks with
Operate with limited to operate at optimal minimal
documentation 13.3 x 120%
resource and asset output level and be supervision and EE
= 15.96
(6.0% Ind. Weight)
requirements flexible enough to handle guidance. Enabled
diverse tasks and Utilized all
use of cost-free
activities. available
technology tools
and
Establish Process Mapping
(hardware
innovations&to
Activities utilizing the EE 6
software) to
improve output.
collected data
properly conduct
(13.3% Ind. Weight) Process Mapping
(6.0% Ind. Weight)
ORGANIZATIONAL Exhibit
CAPACITY: Collaborate with internal proficiency
Has performedand
and external
Detailed customers
organization of to technical know-
satisfactorily in
Maximize available ME 6
improve department
documents and files. and how in handling
the areas of SOP 13.3 x 120%
resources and EE
hospital
Exposurewide services
to new Process different
Documentation = 15.96
technology Improvement Projects. activities.
System and QMS
Project.
(6.0% Ind. Weight)
Assess other Departments’
Able react well
needs regarding urgent
even in tight
policies and SOPs to EE 6
(13.3% Ind. Weight) situations such as
support and give
the DOH Audits.
immediate response
INTERNAL PROCESS: Was able to
Embodies the scope of
support the
(6.0% Ind. Weight) Systems and Procedures
Design and operate documentation
Was able to
while effectively
Checking needs of the
as Systems and supportingprevious
specificSOP quickly 13.3 x 120%
Procedure and slowly input to new organizationthe
understand EE
organizational needs. ME = 15.96
6
Department with template and align it with relevantsituation
current within
Accurately understand the
priority to DOH our NEW Masterlist the given
and react
hospital-wide business
Requirements timeframes
accordingly.such
model
as DOH Audits

GUIDELINES MULTIPLIER DESCRIPTION

Exceeding Expectations EE 120% Exceeding the performance standards.
Meeting Expectations ME 100% Meeting the performance standards.
Failing Expectations FE 0% Not meeting the performance standards.
D.3. SIGNATURES
Please sign over and indicate date. Confirms that the Work Plan and/or Results Review has/have been reviewed and discussed by
the signatories below.
Signature: Signature: Signature:

Name: MARY JOY ROBLE Name: LLOYD INEZ Name: ENGR. REY TABADA
DIRECT REPORT IMMEDIATE HEAD/SUPERVISOR DEPARTMENT HEAD
Date: Date: Date:

PART E: COMPETENCIES ASSESSMENT

Prepared by Department Head with inputs from Direct Report and other performance feedback providers. Refer to the Guidelines
below. For Staff, ME (Meeting Expectations) is benchmarked against “Beginner” Level in the Competencies Progression, for
Manager to Senior Manager against “Proficient” and AVPs and Up against “Expert”.)

QUALI FINAL
E.1. CORE EMPLOYEE COMPETENCIES ASSESSMENT SUPPORTING RATING
RATING
= 20% TOTAL WEIGHT STATEMENTS (Quant. x Ind.
(EE, ME, FE) Weight)
Trustworthiness
(6.7% Ind. Weight)
Proficient: Regularly engages self and Highly dependable and do highly
others in improving job performance complex work with minimal ME 6.7
and overall productivity of the business supervision.
unit. Consistently complete and
comply with the same.
Customer Care
(6.7% Ind. Weight)
Proficient: Shows confidence in
making customers understand the
situation by explaining procedures to
Always sensitive and patient to
patients/customers providing updates
handle internal and external EE 6.7
regularly. Able to teach co-workers
customers.
how patient or customers can be
handled better, especially in difficult
situations. Suggests and implements
changes to improve the quality of
service.
Self-Management
(6.7% Ind. Weight)
Proficient: Makes use of available Using entrepreneurial skills in
skills and resources to achieve assigned understanding and handling key
tasks and encourages others to stay business concepts which makes ME 6.7
focused and get things done as well. process documentation more
Makes every effort to make detailed and accurate.
improvements to systems and process
when required.
QUALI FINAL
E.2. CODE OF CONDUCT ASSESSMENT SUPPORTING RATING
RATING
= 10% TOTAL WEIGHT STATEMENTS (Quant. x Ind.
(EE, ME, FE) Weight)
  EE = 0 verbal warning
100% adherence to the code of
 ME = with verbal warning/s
conduct EE 10
(10.0% Ind. Weight)  FE = with at least 1 written
warning
MISSION-CRITICAL DEVELOPMENT AREA
Prepared by the Department Head. Indicated which one or more core employee competencies and/or code of conduct is/are
observed as chronic development areas of the direct report (if any) and that hindered him or her to deliver expectations. Provide
explanations on each.)
Personnel Development / Advancement
 Undergo Technical Trainings (Green Belt Lean Six Sigma, ISO Auditor Certification, etc.)
 Undergo Leadership Training for future departmental setup

GUIDELINES MULTIPLIER DESCRIPTION

Exceeding Expectations EE 120% Exceeding the performance standards.
Meeting Expectations ME 100% Meeting the performance standards.
Failing Expectations FE 0% Not meeting the performance standards.