You are on page 1of 80

‭DR.

AKHILESH DAS GUPTA INSTITUTE OF PROFESSIONAL‬


‭STUDIES,‬
‭SHASTRI PARK, DELHI - 110053‬

‭ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING‬


‭(ERP)‬
‭REPORT‬
‭OF MAJOR PROJECT‬

‭BACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY‬

‭INFORMATION & TECHNOLOGY (IT)‬

‭SUBMITTED BY‬

‭ EEPANSHU BISHT: 02815603120‬


D
‭HIMANSHU GUPTA: 05215603120‬
‭HITANSH GUPTA: 05415603120‬
‭PRANAV GARG: 35115603120‬

‭MARCH, 2024‬
‭CANDIDATES DECLARATION‬

‭We,‬‭Deepanshu‬‭Bisht,‬‭Himanshu‬‭Gupta,‬‭Hitansh‬‭Gupta‬‭and‬‭Pranav‬‭Garg‬‭,‬‭the‬‭students‬‭of‬
‭Dr.‬ ‭Akhilesh‬ ‭Das‬ ‭Gupta‬ ‭Institute‬ ‭of‬ ‭Professional‬ ‭Studies‬ ‭pursuing‬ ‭B.Tech‬ ‭in‬ ‭Information‬
‭Technology‬ ‭(IT),‬ ‭jointly‬ ‭declare‬‭that‬‭the‬‭minor‬‭project‬‭titled‬‭"‭E
‬ nterprise‬‭Resource‬‭Planning‬
‭(ERP)‬‭"‬‭is‬‭the‬‭outcome‬‭of‬‭our‬‭collective‬‭effort.‬‭We‬‭have‬‭not‬‭submitted‬‭this‬‭work‬‭elsewhere‬‭for‬
‭any academic purpose.‬

‭We‬‭further‬‭declare‬‭that‬‭the‬‭sources‬‭of‬‭information‬‭and‬‭data‬‭used‬‭in‬‭this‬‭project‬‭have‬‭been‬‭duly‬
‭acknowledged.‬ ‭All‬ ‭assistance,‬ ‭guidance,‬ ‭and‬ ‭collaboration‬ ‭received‬ ‭from‬ ‭individuals‬ ‭or‬
‭institutions during the project have been properly credited.‬

‭We‬‭understand‬‭that‬‭any‬‭act‬‭of‬‭plagiarism‬‭or‬‭unauthorized‬‭use‬‭of‬‭others'‬‭work‬‭in‬‭our‬‭project‬‭may‬
‭result in disciplinary action as per the rules and regulations of the university.‬

‭Date:‬

‭Signatures:‬

‭1.‬ ‭DEEPANSHU BISHT Enrollment Number: 02815603120‬

‭2.‬ ‭HIMANSHU GUPTA Enrollment Number: 05215603120‬

‭3.‬ ‭HITANSH GUPTA Enrollment Number: 05415603120‬

‭4.‬ ‭PRANAV GARG Enrollment Number: 35115603120‬

‭B.Tech (IT) , 7th Semester‬

‭DR. AKHILESH DAS GUPTA INSTITUTE OF PROFESSIONAL STUDIES,‬


‭Approved‬ ‭by‬ ‭AICTE‬ ‭and‬ ‭Affiliated‬ ‭with‬ ‭Guru‬ ‭Gobind‬ ‭Singh‬ ‭Indraprastha‬ ‭University‬
‭(GGSIPU).‬
‭CERTIFICATE‬

‭We‬ ‭hereby‬ ‭certify‬ ‭that‬ ‭the‬ ‭work‬ ‭presented‬ ‭in‬ ‭the‬ ‭project‬ ‭report‬ ‭entitled‬ ‭"ENTERPRISE‬
‭RESOURCE‬ ‭PLANNING"‬ ‭is‬ ‭to‬ ‭the‬ ‭partial‬ ‭fulfillment‬‭of‬‭the‬‭requirements‬‭for‬‭the‬‭award‬‭of‬
‭the‬‭degree‬‭of‬‭Bachelor‬‭of‬‭Technology‬‭in‬‭Information‬‭Technology‬‭from‬‭Dr.‬‭Akhilesh‬‭Das‬‭Gupta‬
‭Institute‬ ‭of‬ ‭Professional‬ ‭Studies,‬ ‭New‬ ‭Delhi.‬ ‭This‬ ‭is‬ ‭an‬ ‭authentic‬ ‭record‬ ‭of‬ ‭our‬ ‭own‬ ‭work‬
‭carried‬ ‭out‬ ‭during‬ ‭the‬ ‭period‬ ‭from‬ ‭February‬ ‭2024‬ ‭to‬ ‭May‬ ‭2024‬ ‭under‬ ‭the‬ ‭guidance‬ ‭of‬ ‭our‬
‭Mentor,‬‭Ms. Anshika (Associate Professor)‬‭, IT department.‬

‭The‬ ‭matter‬ ‭presented‬ ‭in‬ ‭this‬ ‭project‬ ‭has‬ ‭not‬ ‭been‬ ‭submitted‬ ‭by‬‭us‬‭for‬‭the‬‭award‬‭of‬‭any‬‭other‬
‭degree elsewhere.‬

‭Date:‬

‭Signatures:‬
‭1.‬ ‭DEEPANSHU BISHT Enrollment Number: 02815603120‬

‭2.‬ ‭HIMANSHU GUPTA Enrollment Number: 05215603120‬

‭3.‬ ‭HITANSH GUPTA Enrollment Number: 05415603120‬

‭4.‬ ‭PRANAV GARG Enrollment Number: 3515603120‬

‭B.Tech (IT) , 7th Semester‬

‭This‬ ‭is‬ ‭to‬ ‭certify‬‭that‬‭the‬‭above‬‭statement‬‭made‬‭by‬‭the‬‭candidates‬‭is‬‭correct‬‭to‬‭the‬‭best‬‭of‬‭my‬


k‭ nowledge. They are permitted to appear in the Major Project External Examination.‬

‭ r. Ankit Agarwal‬
D ‭ r. Anil Kumar, IT Deptt.‬
D
‭(HOD, IT Department)‬ ‭(Project Coordinator Head)‬

‭ he‬ ‭B.Tech‬ ‭Minor‬ ‭Project‬ ‭Viva-Voce‬ ‭Examination‬ ‭of‬ ‭Deepanshu‬ ‭Bisht‬ ‭(02815603120),‬
T
‭Himanshu‬ ‭Gupta‬ ‭(05215603120),‬ ‭Hitansh‬ ‭Gupta‬ ‭(05415603120)‬ ‭and‬ ‭Pranav‬ ‭Garg‬
‭(35115603120), has been held on ________.‬

‭(Signature of External Examiner)‬ ‭Ms. Anshika,‬‭IT Deptt.‬


‭(Project Mentor)‬
‭ACKNOWLEDGMENT‬
‭We‬‭express‬‭our‬‭sincere‬‭gratitude‬‭to‬‭all‬‭those‬‭who‬‭have‬‭contributed‬‭to‬‭the‬‭successful‬‭completion‬
‭of‬‭our‬‭minor‬‭project,‬‭“‬‭Enterprise‬‭Resource‬‭Planning‬‭(ERP).”‬‭This‬‭endeavour‬‭would‬‭not‬‭have‬
‭been possible without the support and guidance of various individuals and resources.‬

‭We‬ ‭would‬ ‭like‬ ‭to‬ ‭extend‬ ‭our‬ ‭heartfelt‬ ‭thanks‬ ‭to‬ ‭our‬ ‭project‬ ‭guide/mentor,‬ ‭Ms.‬ ‭Anshika‬
‭(Associate‬ ‭Professor)‬‭,‬ ‭for‬ ‭their‬ ‭valuable‬ ‭supervision,‬ ‭insightful‬ ‭feedback,‬ ‭and‬ ‭constant‬
‭encouragement‬ ‭throughout‬ ‭the‬ ‭project‬ ‭duration.‬ ‭Their‬ ‭expertise‬ ‭and‬ ‭willingness‬ ‭to‬ ‭share‬
‭knowledge have been instrumental in shaping the project.‬

‭Our‬ ‭appreciation‬ ‭goes‬ ‭to‬ ‭Dr.‬ ‭Anil‬ ‭Kumar‬ ‭(Project‬ ‭Coordinator‬ ‭Head),‬ ‭whose‬ ‭inputs‬ ‭and‬
‭assistance have added significant value to our work.‬

‭We‬ ‭are‬ ‭also‬ ‭thankful‬ ‭to‬‭the‬‭faculty‬‭members‬‭of‬‭the‬‭Department‬‭of‬‭Information‬‭Technology‬‭at‬


‭Dr.‬ ‭Akhilesh‬ ‭Das‬ ‭Gupta‬ ‭Institute‬ ‭of‬ ‭Professional‬ ‭Studies‬ ‭for‬ ‭providing‬ ‭a‬ ‭conducive‬
‭academic environment and resources for our project.‬

‭Thank you to everyone who played a part in making this project a reality.‬

‭Date:‬

‭Signatures:‬

‭1.‬ ‭DEEPANSHU BISHT Enrollment Number: 02815603120‬

‭2.‬ ‭HIMANSHU GUPTA Enrollment Number: 05215603120‬

‭3.‬ ‭HITANSH GUPTA Enrollment Number: 05415603120‬

‭4.‬ ‭PRANAV GARG Enrollment Number: 3515603120‬

‭B.Tech (IT) , 7th Semester‬

‭DR. AKHILESH DAS GUPTA INSTITUTE OF PROFESSIONAL STUDIES,‬


‭Approved‬ ‭by‬ ‭AICTE‬ ‭and‬ ‭Affiliated‬ ‭with‬ ‭Guru‬ ‭Gobind‬ ‭Singh‬ ‭Indraprastha‬ ‭University‬
‭(GGSIPU).‬
‭ABSTRACT‬
‭Enterprise‬ ‭Resource‬ ‭Planning‬ ‭(ERP)‬ ‭systems‬ ‭play‬ ‭a‬ ‭pivotal‬ ‭role‬ ‭in‬ ‭enhancing‬ ‭organizational‬
‭efficiency‬‭by‬‭integrating‬‭various‬‭business‬‭processes.‬‭This‬‭project‬‭presents‬‭the‬‭development‬‭of‬‭a‬
‭comprehensive‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭system‬ ‭using‬ ‭modern‬ ‭web‬ ‭technologies.‬ ‭The‬ ‭system‬ ‭utilizes‬ ‭Django‬‭,‬ ‭a‬
‭robust‬ ‭Python‬‭web‬‭framework,‬‭as‬‭the‬‭backend‬‭,‬‭and‬‭leverages‬‭HTML,‬‭CSS,‬‭and‬‭JavaScript‬
‭for‬‭the‬‭frontend‬‭interface‬‭.‬‭SQLite‬‭is‬‭employed‬‭as‬‭the‬‭database‬‭management‬‭system‬‭to‬‭store‬
‭and manage enterprise data.‬

‭The‬‭ERP‬‭system‬‭is‬‭designed‬‭to‬‭streamline‬‭and‬‭automate‬‭key‬‭business‬‭functions,‬‭including‬‭but‬
‭not‬ ‭limited‬ ‭to,‬ ‭inventory‬ ‭management,‬ ‭human‬ ‭resources,‬ ‭finance,‬ ‭and‬ ‭customer‬ ‭relationship‬
‭management.‬ ‭The‬ ‭use‬ ‭of‬ ‭Django‬ ‭provides‬ ‭a‬ ‭scalable‬ ‭and‬ ‭maintainable‬ ‭backend‬ ‭structure,‬
‭ensuring robustness and security in handling sensitive enterprise data.‬

‭The‬‭frontend,‬‭developed‬‭with‬‭HTML‬‭for‬‭structure,‬‭CSS‬‭for‬‭styling,‬‭and‬‭JavaScript‬‭for‬‭dynamic‬
‭interactions,‬ ‭offers‬ ‭an‬ ‭intuitive‬ ‭and‬ ‭user-friendly‬ ‭interface.‬ ‭This‬ ‭allows‬ ‭users‬ ‭to‬ ‭seamlessly‬
‭navigate‬ ‭through‬ ‭the‬ ‭system,‬ ‭interact‬ ‭with‬ ‭data,‬ ‭and‬ ‭perform‬ ‭essential‬ ‭tasks‬ ‭with‬ ‭minimal‬
‭training.‬

‭The‬‭choice‬‭of‬‭SQLite‬‭as‬‭the‬‭database‬‭management‬‭system‬‭ensures‬‭data‬‭integrity‬‭and‬‭reliability,‬
‭making‬ ‭it‬ ‭suitable‬ ‭for‬ ‭small‬ ‭to‬ ‭medium-sized‬ ‭enterprises.‬ ‭The‬ ‭system's‬ ‭modular‬ ‭architecture‬
‭allows for easy customization and integration with existing enterprise systems.‬

‭The‬‭successful‬‭implementation‬‭of‬‭this‬‭ERP‬‭system‬‭holds‬‭the‬‭potential‬‭to‬‭significantly‬‭improve‬
‭organizational‬ ‭workflows,‬ ‭reduce‬ ‭operational‬ ‭redundancies,‬‭and‬‭provide‬‭real-time‬‭insights‬‭for‬
‭better‬‭decision-making.‬‭This‬‭project‬‭serves‬‭as‬‭a‬‭demonstration‬‭of‬‭the‬‭synergy‬‭between‬‭backend,‬
‭frontend,‬ ‭and‬ ‭database‬ ‭technologies‬ ‭in‬ ‭creating‬ ‭a‬ ‭powerful‬ ‭and‬ ‭efficient‬ ‭enterprise-level‬
‭solution.‬

‭In‬ ‭conclusion,‬ ‭this‬ ‭project‬ ‭provides‬ ‭a‬ ‭holistic‬ ‭view‬ ‭of‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭systems,‬ ‭combining‬ ‭theoretical‬
‭knowledge‬ ‭with‬ ‭practical‬ ‭insights.‬ ‭It‬ ‭serves‬ ‭as‬ ‭a‬ ‭valuable‬ ‭resource‬ ‭for‬ ‭organizations‬
‭contemplating‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭implementation,‬ ‭offering‬ ‭a‬ ‭roadmap‬ ‭for‬ ‭successful‬ ‭integration‬ ‭and‬
‭optimization of business processes.‬
‭TABLE CONTENTS‬
‭●‬ ‭CHAPTER ONE‬
‭1.‬ ‭INTRODUCTION‬
‭1.2‬ ‭Organizational Background‬
‭1.3‬ ‭Organizational Structure‬
‭1.4‬ ‭Motivation‬
‭1.5‬ ‭Problem Statement‬
‭1.6‬ ‭Objectives of the Project‬
‭1.7‬ ‭Feasibility Study‬
1‭ .7.1‬ ‭Economic Feasibility‬
‭1.7.2‬ ‭Technical Feasibility‬
‭1.7.3‬ ‭Operational Feasibility‬
‭1.7.4‬ ‭Political Feasibility‬
‭1.7.5‬ ‭Schedule Feasibility‬
‭1.8‬ ‭Significance of the Project‬
‭1.9‬ ‭Beneficiaries of the System‬
‭1.10‬‭Software Requirement Specification‬
‭1.11‬‭Software Development Model‬
‭1.12‬‭Methodology‬
‭1.13‬‭Scope and Limitation of the Project‬
‭1.13.1‬ ‭Scope‬
‭1.13.2‬ ‭Limitations‬
‭1.14‬‭Tasks of the Team Member in the Project‬
‭1.15‬‭Time Schedule for the Project‬
1‭ .15.1‬ ‭Gantt Chart‬
‭1.15.2‬ ‭PERT Chart‬
‭1.15.3‬ ‭Critical Path Method‬
‭1.16‬‭Cost and Effort Measurement‬
‭1.16.1‬ ‭Cost Measurement‬
‭1.16.2‬ ‭Effort Measurement‬

‭●‬ ‭CHAPTER TWO‬


‭2.‬ ‭LITERATURE REVIEW‬
‭2.1‬ ‭Related Work‬
‭2.2‬ ‭Identification and Classification Faults‬
‭●‬ ‭CHAPTER THREE‬
‭3.‬ ‭BUSINESS AREA ANALYSIS AND REQUIREMENT ANALYSIS‬
‭3.1‬ ‭Introduction‬
‭3.2‬ ‭Description of the Existing System‬
‭3.3‬ ‭Activities Provided by the Existing System‬
‭3.4‬ ‭Major Functions of the Existing System‬
‭3.5‬ ‭Strength and Weakness of the Existing System‬
‭3.6‬ ‭Player of the Existing System‬
‭3.7‬ ‭Business Rule Identification‬
‭3.8‬ ‭Evidence in the Existing System‬
‭3.9‬ ‭Problems in the Existing System‬
‭3.10‬‭Practice to be Preserved‬
‭3.11‬‭The Proposed System‬
‭3.12‬‭Functional Requirements‬
‭3.13‬‭Non - Functional Requirements‬
‭3.13.1‬ ‭Correctness‬
‭3.13.2‬ ‭User Friendly / System Interface‬
‭3.13.3‬ ‭Response time‬
‭3.13.4‬ ‭Reliability‬
‭3.13.5‬ ‭Performance‬
‭3.13.6‬ ‭Robustness‬
‭3.13.7‬ ‭Maintainability‬
‭3.13.8‬ ‭Effectiveness‬
‭3.13.9‬ ‭Efficiency‬
‭3.13.10‬‭Portability‬
‭3.13.11‬‭Development Costs‬
‭3.13.12‬‭Operational Costs‬
‭3.13.13‬‭Security‬
‭3.13.14‬‭Compatibility‬
‭3.13.15‬‭Availability‬

‭●‬ ‭CHAPTER FOUR‬


‭4.‬ ‭ANALYSIS AND DELIVERABLES OF THE NEW SYSTEM‬
‭4.1‬ ‭Case Study of Proposed System‬
‭4.2‬ ‭Use Case Diagram of the System‬
‭4.2.1‬ ‭Description of Actors‬
4‭ .2.2‬ ‭Description of System Use Case‬
‭4.2.3‬ ‭Use Case Diagram‬
‭4.3‬ ‭Class Diagram‬
‭4.4‬ ‭Object Diagram‬
‭4.5‬ ‭Sequence Diagram‬

‭●‬ ‭CHAPTER FIVE‬


‭5.‬ ‭SYSTEM DESIGN AND ARCHITECTURE‬
‭5.1‬ ‭Introduction‬
‭5.2‬ ‭DFD‬
‭5.2.1‬ ‭Context Data Flow Diagram‬
‭5.2.2‬ ‭N Level of Data Flow Diagram‬
‭5.3‬ ‭Entity Relationship Diagram‬
‭5.4‬ ‭Logical Model‬
‭5.5‬ ‭Physical Model‬
‭5.6‬ ‭Normalization of Data Base‬
‭5.7‬ ‭Activity Diagram‬
‭5.8‬ ‭Collaboration Diagram‬
‭5.9‬ ‭State Diagram‬
‭5.10‬‭Component Diagram‬
‭5.11‬‭Deployment Diagram‬
‭5.12‬‭Persistence Diagram‬
‭5.13‬‭User Interface Design‬

‭●‬ ‭CHAPTER SIX‬


‭6.‬ ‭RESULT AND DISCUSSION‬
‭6.1‬ ‭Merit, Demerit and Application‬

‭●‬ ‭CHAPTER SEVEN‬


‭7.‬ ‭Conclusion‬
‭7.1‬ ‭Future Scope‬

‭REFERENCES‬
‭CHAPTER ONE‬
‭1.‬ ‭Introduction‬
‭In‬ ‭the‬ ‭ever-evolving‬ ‭realm‬ ‭of‬ ‭business,‬ ‭organizations‬ ‭continually‬ ‭strive‬ ‭to‬ ‭elevate‬ ‭their‬
‭operational‬ ‭efficiency,‬ ‭agility,‬ ‭and‬ ‭competitiveness.‬ ‭A‬ ‭crucial‬ ‭avenue‬ ‭for‬ ‭achieving‬ ‭these‬
‭objectives‬ ‭lies‬ ‭in‬ ‭the‬ ‭seamless‬ ‭integration‬ ‭and‬ ‭adept‬ ‭management‬ ‭of‬ ‭essential‬ ‭business‬
‭functions.‬ ‭Enterprise‬‭Resource‬‭Planning‬‭(ERP)‬‭emerges‬‭as‬‭a‬‭comprehensive‬‭software‬‭solution‬
‭uniquely‬ ‭poised‬ ‭to‬ ‭address‬‭this‬‭imperative‬‭by‬‭streamlining‬‭and‬‭consolidating‬‭diverse‬‭business‬
‭processes into a unified platform.‬

‭ERP‬‭systems‬‭play‬‭a‬‭pivotal‬‭role‬‭in‬‭fostering‬‭seamless‬‭communication‬‭and‬‭collaboration‬‭across‬
‭various‬ ‭departments,‬ ‭encompassing‬ ‭critical‬ ‭areas‬ ‭such‬ ‭as‬ ‭finance,‬ ‭human‬ ‭resources,‬ ‭supply‬
‭chain,‬ ‭procurement,‬ ‭manufacturing,‬ ‭and‬ ‭more.‬ ‭By‬ ‭establishing‬ ‭a‬ ‭centralized‬ ‭repository‬ ‭of‬
‭real-time‬ ‭data‬ ‭and‬ ‭standardized‬ ‭processes,‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭empowers‬ ‭organizations‬ ‭to‬ ‭make‬ ‭informed‬
‭decisions, optimize resource allocation, and elevate overall productivity.‬

‭Nevertheless,‬‭the‬‭successful‬‭implementation‬‭of‬‭ERP‬‭represents‬‭a‬‭multifaceted‬‭endeavour,‬‭often‬
‭accompanied‬ ‭by‬ ‭challenges‬ ‭related‬ ‭to‬ ‭change‬ ‭management,‬ ‭technology‬ ‭integration,‬ ‭cost‬
‭considerations,‬‭and‬‭organizational‬‭readiness.‬‭Despite‬‭these‬‭challenges,‬‭the‬‭potential‬‭benefits‬‭of‬
‭ERP‬ ‭adoption‬ ‭are‬ ‭substantial,‬ ‭spanning‬ ‭from‬ ‭heightened‬ ‭operational‬ ‭efficiency‬‭and‬‭enhanced‬
‭data accuracy to improved customer service and more robust financial management.‬

‭This‬ ‭research‬ ‭endeavours‬ ‭to‬ ‭delve‬ ‭deep‬ ‭into‬ ‭the‬ ‭realm‬ ‭of‬ ‭ERP,‬ ‭exploring‬ ‭its‬ ‭transformative‬
‭potential‬ ‭in‬ ‭revolutionizing‬ ‭how‬ ‭organizations‬ ‭manage‬ ‭their‬ ‭resources,‬ ‭streamline‬‭operations,‬
‭and‬ ‭navigate‬ ‭an‬ ‭increasingly‬ ‭competitive‬ ‭business‬ ‭landscape.‬ ‭By‬ ‭comprehending‬ ‭the‬ ‭core‬
‭functionalities‬ ‭and‬ ‭benefits‬ ‭of‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭systems,‬ ‭organizations‬ ‭can‬ ‭make‬ ‭judicious‬ ‭decisions‬
‭regarding‬ ‭adoption‬ ‭and‬ ‭tailor‬ ‭implementations‬ ‭to‬ ‭suit‬ ‭their‬ ‭unique‬ ‭requirements.‬ ‭Ultimately,‬
‭this‬ ‭study‬ ‭aims‬‭to‬‭illuminate‬‭how‬‭ERP‬‭can‬‭act‬‭as‬‭a‬‭catalyst‬‭for‬‭positive‬‭transformation‬‭within‬
‭organizations, fostering sustainable growth and enduring success.‬

‭1.2‬‭Organizational Background‬
‭The organizational background of ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) involves understanding‬
‭why businesses adopt ERP systems. Here is an overview:‬

‭1‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭1.‬ ‭Business Complexity:‬‭As companies grow, managing multiple processes becomes‬
‭complex, driving the need for unified systems.‬
‭2.‬ ‭Operational Efficiency‬‭: ERP integrates functions like‬‭finance and supply chain for‬
‭streamlined operations.‬
‭3.‬ ‭Real-time Decision-Making:‬‭Access to real-time data‬‭enables quick, informed‬
‭decisions.‬
‭4.‬ ‭Data Accuracy:‬‭ERP ensures standardized, reliable‬‭data across the organization.‬
‭5.‬ ‭Collaboration:‬‭ERP fosters seamless communication‬‭and teamwork.‬
‭6.‬ ‭Competitive Edge:‬‭ERP helps organizations respond‬‭to market changes swiftly.‬
‭7.‬ ‭Cost Optimization:‬‭Though an investment, ERP leads‬‭to long-term savings.‬
‭8.‬ ‭Implementation Challenges:‬‭Hurdles include change‬‭management and technology‬
‭integration.‬
‭9.‬ ‭Transformational Potential‬‭: ERP is seen as a tool‬‭for revolutionizing resource‬
‭management and adapting to change.‬

‭Understanding‬ ‭the‬ ‭organizational‬ ‭background‬ ‭of‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭is‬‭essential‬‭for‬‭successful‬‭adoption‬‭and‬


‭implementation.‬‭It‬‭involves‬‭aligning‬‭the‬‭ERP‬‭strategy‬‭with‬‭the‬‭organization's‬‭goals,‬‭addressing‬
‭challenges‬ ‭proactively,‬ ‭and‬ ‭leveraging‬ ‭the‬ ‭transformative‬ ‭potential‬ ‭of‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭to‬ ‭drive‬ ‭positive‬
‭change within the organization.‬

‭1.3‬‭Organizational Structure‬
‭The‬ ‭organizational‬ ‭structure‬ ‭of‬ ‭an‬ ‭Enterprise‬ ‭Resource‬ ‭Planning‬ ‭(ERP)‬ ‭system‬ ‭typically‬
‭involves‬‭different‬‭components‬‭and‬‭roles‬‭to‬‭ensure‬‭effective‬‭implementation,‬‭management,‬‭and‬
‭utilization‬ ‭of‬ ‭the‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭software‬ ‭within‬‭an‬‭organization.‬‭Here‬‭is‬‭a‬‭general‬‭overview‬‭of‬‭the‬‭key‬
‭elements in the organizational structure of ERP:‬

‭1.‬ ‭Executive Sponsorship:‬


‭●‬ ‭Role: High-level executives providing strategic direction and resources.‬
‭●‬ ‭Responsibilities: Setting goals and overseeing progress.‬
‭2.‬ ‭ERP Steering Committee:‬
‭●‬ ‭Role: Cross-functional leaders guiding decision-making.‬
‭●‬ ‭Responsibilities: Prioritizing issues and ensuring alignment.‬
‭3.‬ ‭Project Manager:‬
‭●‬ ‭Role: Oversees day-to-day operations.‬

‭2‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭●‬ ‭Responsibilities: Planning, coordination, and staying on schedule.‬
‭4.‬ ‭ERP Project Team:‬
‭●‬ ‭Role: Cross-functional members involved in design and testing.‬
‭●‬ ‭Responsibilities: Contributing expertise and ensuring department needs are met.‬
‭5.‬ ‭ERP Consultant(s):‬
‭●‬ ‭Role: Experts advising on best practices.‬
‭●‬ ‭Responsibilities: Offering guidance and assistance during implementation.‬
‭6.‬ ‭IT Department:‬
‭●‬ ‭Role: Handles technical aspects.‬
‭●‬ ‭Responsibilities: Installing, configuring, and maintaining software.‬
‭7.‬ ‭End Users:‬
‭●‬ ‭Role: Employees interacting with the system daily.‬
‭●‬ ‭Responsibilities: Using the system and providing feedback.‬
‭8.‬ ‭Change Management Team:‬
‭●‬ ‭Role: Manages organizational change.‬
‭●‬ ‭Responsibilities: Developing strategies and facilitating training.‬
‭9.‬ ‭Quality Assurance/Testing Team:‬
‭●‬ ‭Role: Ensures system meets quality standards.‬
‭●‬ ‭Responsibilities: Conducting testing and resolving issues.‬
‭10.‬‭Post-Implementation Support Team:‬
‭●‬ ‭Role: Provides ongoing support.‬
‭●‬ ‭Responsibilities: Addresses user issues and implements updates.‬
‭The‬ ‭exact‬‭structure‬‭may‬‭vary‬‭depending‬‭on‬‭the‬‭organization's‬‭size,‬‭industry,‬‭and‬‭specific‬‭ERP‬
‭solution.‬ ‭Successful‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭implementation‬ ‭often‬ ‭involves‬ ‭collaboration‬ ‭and‬ ‭communication‬
‭among these different elements within the organizational structure.‬

‭1.4‬‭Motivation‬
‭In‬ ‭today's‬ ‭dynamic‬ ‭business‬ ‭environment,‬ ‭achieving‬ ‭operational‬ ‭excellence‬ ‭is‬ ‭crucial.‬
‭Enterprise‬ ‭Resource‬‭Planning‬‭(ERP)‬‭offers‬‭a‬‭transformative‬‭solution,‬‭integrating‬‭functions‬‭for‬
‭streamlined‬ ‭processes‬ ‭and‬ ‭real-time‬ ‭insights.‬‭ERP‬‭implementation‬‭is‬‭motivated‬‭by‬‭the‬‭pursuit‬

‭3‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭of‬ ‭efficiency,‬ ‭collaboration,‬ ‭and‬ ‭strategic‬ ‭decision-making.‬ ‭It‬ ‭signifies‬ ‭a‬ ‭commitment‬ ‭to‬
‭organizational‬ ‭excellence‬ ‭and‬ ‭leveraging‬ ‭technology‬ ‭for‬ ‭innovation‬ ‭and‬ ‭industry‬ ‭leadership.‬
‭Through‬‭exploring‬‭ERP,‬‭we‬‭aim‬‭to‬‭unlock‬‭its‬‭potential‬‭for‬‭sustainable‬‭growth‬‭and‬‭agility‬‭in‬‭our‬
‭organization.‬

‭1.5‬‭Problem Statement‬
‭In‬ ‭the‬ ‭dynamic‬ ‭landscape‬ ‭of‬ ‭our‬ ‭organization,‬ ‭the‬ ‭current‬ ‭operational‬ ‭framework‬ ‭faces‬
‭challenges‬ ‭that‬ ‭impede‬ ‭efficiency,‬ ‭collaboration,‬ ‭and‬ ‭data‬ ‭integrity.‬ ‭The‬ ‭absence‬ ‭of‬ ‭a‬ ‭unified‬
‭system‬ ‭results‬ ‭in‬ ‭disjointed‬ ‭processes,‬ ‭leading‬ ‭to‬ ‭delays,‬ ‭inaccuracies,‬ ‭and‬ ‭an‬ ‭overall‬‭lack‬‭of‬
‭agility in responding to market demands.‬

‭Key issues include:‬

‭1.‬ ‭Disparate‬ ‭Systems:‬ ‭Various‬ ‭departments‬ ‭operate‬ ‭in‬ ‭silos‬ ‭with‬ ‭independent‬ ‭software‬
‭solutions,‬‭leading‬‭to‬‭a‬‭lack‬‭of‬‭real-time‬‭synchronization‬‭and‬‭hindering‬‭cross-functional‬
‭collaboration.‬

‭2.‬ ‭Data‬‭Inconsistency:‬‭Inconsistent‬‭data‬‭across‬‭departments‬‭hampers‬‭decision-making,‬‭as‬
‭conflicting‬ ‭information‬ ‭emerges‬ ‭from‬ ‭different‬ ‭sources,‬ ‭leading‬ ‭to‬ ‭errors‬ ‭and‬
‭misalignments.‬

‭3.‬ ‭Manual‬ ‭Processes:‬ ‭Many‬ ‭critical‬ ‭processes‬ ‭rely‬ ‭heavily‬ ‭on‬ ‭manual‬ ‭interventions,‬
‭resulting in inefficiencies, increased response times, and a higher likelihood of errors.‬

‭4.‬ ‭Limited‬ ‭Visibility:‬ ‭The‬ ‭current‬ ‭system‬ ‭provides‬ ‭limited‬ ‭visibility‬ ‭into‬ ‭organizational‬
‭processes,‬ ‭making‬ ‭it‬ ‭challenging‬‭to‬‭obtain‬‭comprehensive‬‭insights‬‭crucial‬‭for‬‭strategic‬
‭decision-making.‬

‭5.‬ ‭Scalability‬ ‭Concerns:‬ ‭As‬ ‭our‬ ‭organization‬ ‭grows,‬ ‭the‬ ‭existing‬ ‭systems‬ ‭prove‬
‭inadequate‬ ‭in‬ ‭scaling‬ ‭operations,‬ ‭resulting‬ ‭in‬ ‭bottlenecks,‬ ‭and‬ ‭hindering‬ ‭the‬ ‭seamless‬
‭incorporation of new business units.‬

‭The‬ ‭identified‬ ‭problems‬ ‭underscore‬ ‭the‬ ‭urgent‬ ‭need‬ ‭for‬ ‭a‬ ‭comprehensive‬ ‭solution‬ ‭that‬ ‭can‬
‭address‬ ‭these‬ ‭challenges.‬ ‭The‬ ‭implementation‬ ‭of‬ ‭an‬ ‭Enterprise‬ ‭Resource‬ ‭Planning‬ ‭(ERP)‬
‭system‬ ‭emerges‬ ‭as‬ ‭the‬ ‭strategic‬ ‭remedy‬ ‭to‬ ‭unite‬ ‭disparate‬‭processes,‬‭ensure‬‭data‬‭consistency,‬
‭automate manual tasks, enhance visibility, and provide scalability for future growth.‬

‭4‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭This‬ ‭project‬ ‭aims‬ ‭to‬ ‭explore,‬ ‭design,‬ ‭and‬ ‭implement‬ ‭an‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭system‬ ‭tailored‬ ‭to‬ ‭our‬
‭organizational‬ ‭needs,‬ ‭ultimately‬ ‭fostering‬ ‭a‬ ‭more‬ ‭agile,‬ ‭interconnected,‬ ‭and‬ ‭efficient‬
‭operational environment.‬

‭5‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭1.6‬‭Objectives of the Project‬
‭The‬‭objectives‬‭of‬‭ERP‬‭(Enterprise‬‭Resource‬‭Planning)‬‭projects‬‭can‬‭vary‬‭based‬‭on‬‭the‬‭specific‬
‭needs and goals of an organization. However, common objectives include:‬

‭1.‬ ‭Integrated‬‭Business‬‭Processes:‬‭To‬‭streamline‬‭and‬‭integrate‬‭various‬‭business‬‭processes‬
‭across different departments and functions within the organization.‬

‭2.‬ ‭Real-Time‬ ‭Data‬ ‭Access:‬ ‭To‬ ‭provide‬ ‭timely‬ ‭and‬ ‭accurate‬ ‭information‬ ‭to‬ ‭users‬ ‭for‬
‭informed decision-making.‬

‭3.‬ ‭Improved‬ ‭Data‬ ‭Accuracy:‬ ‭To‬ ‭eliminate‬ ‭data‬ ‭discrepancies‬ ‭and‬ ‭errors‬ ‭through‬
‭standardized and centralized data management.‬

‭4.‬ ‭Enhanced‬ ‭Collaboration:‬ ‭To‬ ‭facilitate‬ ‭communication‬ ‭and‬ ‭collaboration‬ ‭among‬


‭different departments and teams.‬

‭5.‬ ‭Increased‬ ‭Productivity:‬ ‭To‬ ‭streamline‬ ‭and‬ ‭automate‬ ‭routine‬ ‭tasks,‬ ‭reducing‬ ‭manual‬
‭efforts.‬

‭6.‬ ‭Cost Reduction:‬‭To identify and eliminate inefficiencies,‬‭reducing operational costs.‬

‭7.‬ ‭Scalability:‬ ‭To‬ ‭create‬ ‭a‬ ‭system‬ ‭that‬ ‭can‬ ‭adapt‬ ‭and‬ ‭scale‬ ‭with‬ ‭the‬ ‭growth‬ ‭of‬ ‭the‬
‭organization.‬

‭8.‬ ‭Regulatory‬ ‭Compliance:‬ ‭To‬ ‭ensure‬ ‭that‬ ‭the‬‭organization‬‭adheres‬‭to‬‭relevant‬‭industry‬


‭regulations and compliance standards.‬

‭9.‬ ‭Enhanced‬‭Customer‬‭Service:‬‭To‬‭improve‬‭customer‬‭service‬‭by‬‭providing‬‭quick‬‭access‬
‭to customer information and order processing.‬

‭10.‬‭Change‬ ‭Management:‬ ‭To‬ ‭manage‬ ‭and‬ ‭ease‬ ‭the‬ ‭transition‬ ‭for‬ ‭employees‬ ‭adapting‬ ‭to‬
‭new processes and systems.‬

‭11.‬‭Data‬ ‭Security:‬ ‭To‬ ‭implement‬ ‭robust‬ ‭security‬ ‭measures‬ ‭to‬ ‭protect‬ ‭sensitive‬
‭organizational data.‬

‭Defining‬ ‭clear‬ ‭and‬ ‭measurable‬ ‭objectives‬ ‭is‬ ‭critical‬ ‭for‬ ‭the‬ ‭success‬‭of‬‭an‬‭ERP‬‭project.‬‭These‬
‭objectives‬ ‭serve‬ ‭as‬ ‭benchmarks‬ ‭to‬ ‭evaluate‬ ‭the‬ ‭effectiveness‬ ‭of‬ ‭the‬ ‭implementation‬ ‭and‬ ‭its‬
‭impact on the organization.‬

‭6‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭1.7‬ ‭Feasibility Study‬
‭A‬ ‭feasibility‬ ‭study‬ ‭for‬ ‭an‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭(Enterprise‬ ‭Resource‬ ‭Planning)‬ ‭project‬ ‭is‬ ‭a‬ ‭crucial‬ ‭step‬ ‭in‬
‭assessing‬ ‭the‬ ‭viability‬ ‭and‬ ‭potential‬ ‭success‬ ‭of‬ ‭implementing‬ ‭an‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭system‬ ‭within‬ ‭an‬
‭organization.‬ ‭The‬ ‭study‬ ‭typically‬ ‭covers‬ ‭various‬‭aspects‬‭to‬‭ensure‬‭that‬‭the‬‭project‬‭aligns‬‭with‬
‭the‬‭organization's‬‭goals,‬‭resources,‬‭and‬‭capabilities.‬‭Here‬‭are‬‭the‬‭key‬‭elements‬‭to‬‭consider‬‭in‬‭an‬
‭ERP feasibility study:‬

‭1.7.1.‬‭Economic Feasibility:‬

‭●‬ ‭Objective:‬‭Evaluate the financial aspects of implementing‬‭an ERP system.‬

‭●‬ ‭Considerations:‬ ‭Estimate‬ ‭the‬ ‭costs‬ ‭associated‬ ‭with‬ ‭licensing,‬‭implementation,‬


‭training,‬ ‭and‬ ‭ongoing‬ ‭maintenance.‬ ‭Compare‬ ‭these‬ ‭costs‬ ‭against‬ ‭the‬ ‭potential‬
‭benefits and return on investment (ROI).‬

‭1.7.2.‬‭Technical Feasibility:‬

‭●‬ ‭Objective:‬‭Evaluate‬‭the‬‭technical‬‭requirements,‬‭compatibility,‬‭and‬‭infrastructure‬
‭needed for the ERP system.‬

‭●‬ ‭Considerations:‬ ‭Assess‬ ‭the‬ ‭organization's‬ ‭IT‬ ‭infrastructure,‬ ‭software‬


‭compatibility,‬ ‭and‬ ‭hardware‬ ‭requirements‬ ‭to‬ ‭ensure‬ ‭the‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭system‬ ‭can‬ ‭be‬
‭effectively implemented.‬

‭1.7.3.‬‭Operational Feasibility:‬

‭●‬ ‭Objective:‬ ‭Assess‬ ‭the‬ ‭practicality‬ ‭of‬ ‭implementing‬‭the‬‭ERP‬‭system‬‭within‬‭the‬


‭existing operational environment.‬

‭●‬ ‭Considerations:‬‭Analyse‬‭how‬‭well‬‭the‬‭ERP‬‭system‬‭aligns‬‭with‬‭current‬‭business‬
‭processes, workflows, and organizational structure.‬

‭1.7.4.‬‭Political Feasibility:‬

‭●‬ ‭Objective:‬ ‭Assess‬ ‭the‬ ‭level‬ ‭of‬ ‭support‬ ‭and‬ ‭acceptance‬ ‭for‬ ‭the‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭project‬
‭within the organization's political landscape.‬

‭●‬ ‭Considerations:‬‭Evaluate‬‭the‬‭alignment‬‭of‬‭the‬‭ERP‬‭project‬‭with‬‭organizational‬
‭priorities,‬ ‭the‬ ‭support‬ ‭of‬ ‭key‬ ‭stakeholders,‬‭and‬‭the‬‭potential‬‭impact‬‭of‬‭political‬
‭factors on project success.‬

‭7‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭1.7.5.‬‭Schedule Feasibility:‬

‭●‬ ‭Objective:‬‭Assess‬‭the‬‭feasibility‬‭of‬‭completing‬‭the‬‭ERP‬‭implementation‬‭within‬
‭a reasonable timeframe.‬

‭●‬ ‭Considerations:‬ ‭Develop‬ ‭a‬ ‭realistic‬ ‭project‬ ‭schedule,‬ ‭considering‬ ‭the‬


‭organization's‬ ‭deadlines,‬ ‭milestones,‬ ‭and‬ ‭any‬ ‭external‬ ‭factors‬ ‭affecting‬ ‭the‬
‭timeline.‬

‭The‬ ‭feasibility‬ ‭study‬ ‭should‬ ‭provide‬ ‭a‬‭comprehensive‬‭understanding‬‭of‬‭the‬‭potential‬‭benefits,‬


‭challenges,‬ ‭and‬ ‭risks‬ ‭associated‬ ‭with‬ ‭implementing‬ ‭an‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭system.‬‭It‬‭serves‬‭as‬‭a‬‭foundation‬
‭for‬ ‭informed‬ ‭decision-making‬ ‭and‬ ‭helps‬ ‭stakeholders‬ ‭determine‬ ‭whether‬ ‭proceeding‬‭with‬‭the‬
‭ERP project is a viable and strategic choice for the organization.‬

‭1.8‬‭Significance of the Project‬


‭The‬‭significance‬‭of‬‭an‬‭ERP‬‭(Enterprise‬‭Resource‬‭Planning)‬‭project‬‭lies‬‭in‬‭its‬‭potential‬‭to‬‭bring‬
‭about‬ ‭transformative‬ ‭changes‬ ‭and‬ ‭improvements‬ ‭across‬ ‭various‬ ‭aspects‬ ‭of‬ ‭an‬ ‭organization.‬
‭Here are key points highlighting the significance of an ERP project:‬

‭1.‬ ‭Streamlined Operations:‬

‭●‬ ‭Significance:‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭systems‬ ‭integrate‬ ‭and‬ ‭streamline‬ ‭business‬ ‭processes,‬


‭reducing manual interventions, redundancies, and delays.‬

‭●‬ ‭Impact:‬ ‭Enhanced‬ ‭operational‬ ‭efficiency‬ ‭leads‬ ‭to‬ ‭smoother‬ ‭workflows,‬ ‭faster‬
‭response times, and overall productivity gains.‬

‭2.‬ ‭Improved Decision-Making:‬

‭●‬ ‭Significance:‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭provides‬ ‭real-time‬ ‭access‬ ‭to‬ ‭accurate‬ ‭data‬ ‭across‬
‭departments.‬

‭●‬ ‭Impact:‬ ‭Informed‬ ‭decision-making‬ ‭is‬ ‭facilitated,‬ ‭enabling‬ ‭executives‬ ‭to‬ ‭make‬
‭strategic and data-driven choices that align with organizational objectives.‬

‭3.‬ ‭Enhanced Data Accuracy:‬

‭●‬ ‭Significance:‬‭ERP centralizes data, minimizing errors‬‭and inconsistencies.‬

‭8‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭●‬ ‭Impact:‬ ‭Reliable‬ ‭data‬ ‭improves‬ ‭the‬ ‭accuracy‬ ‭of‬ ‭reporting,‬ ‭forecasting,‬ ‭and‬
‭analytics, fostering better business insights.‬

‭4.‬ ‭Cross-Functional Collaboration:‬

‭●‬ ‭Significance:‬‭ERP fosters collaboration by breaking‬‭down departmental silos.‬

‭●‬ ‭Impact:‬‭Improved‬‭communication‬‭and‬‭cooperation‬‭between‬‭departments‬‭lead‬‭to‬
‭a more cohesive organizational structure.‬

‭5.‬ ‭Resource Optimization:‬

‭●‬ ‭Significance:‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭helps‬ ‭in‬ ‭optimizing‬ ‭the‬ ‭use‬ ‭of‬ ‭resources,‬ ‭both‬ ‭human‬ ‭and‬
‭material.‬

‭●‬ ‭Impact:‬‭Efficient‬‭resource‬‭allocation‬‭results‬‭in‬‭cost‬‭savings,‬‭reduced‬‭waste,‬‭and‬
‭improved overall resource utilization.‬

‭6.‬ ‭Customer Satisfaction:‬

‭●‬ ‭Significance:‬ ‭ERP's‬ ‭integrated‬ ‭CRM‬ ‭modules‬ ‭enhance‬ ‭customer‬ ‭relationship‬


‭management.‬

‭●‬ ‭Impact:‬ ‭Improved‬ ‭customer‬ ‭service,‬ ‭quick‬ ‭response‬ ‭times,‬ ‭and‬ ‭accurate‬‭order‬
‭processing contribute to higher customer satisfaction.‬

‭7.‬ ‭Compliance with Regulations:‬

‭●‬ ‭Significance:‬‭ERP helps organizations stay compliant‬‭with industry regulations.‬

‭●‬ ‭Impact:‬ ‭Avoidance‬ ‭of‬ ‭legal‬ ‭issues,‬‭penalties,‬‭and‬‭reputational‬‭damage‬‭through‬


‭adherence to relevant laws.‬

‭8.‬ ‭Strategic Planning and Forecasting:‬

‭●‬ ‭Significance:‬‭ERP provides a solid foundation for‬‭strategic planning.‬

‭●‬ ‭Impact:‬ ‭Organizations‬ ‭can‬ ‭forecast‬ ‭more‬ ‭accurately,‬ ‭plan‬ ‭strategically,‬ ‭and‬
‭proactively respond to market changes.‬

‭9.‬ ‭Data Security:‬

‭●‬ ‭Significance:‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭systems‬ ‭implement‬ ‭robust‬ ‭security‬ ‭measures‬ ‭to‬ ‭protect‬
‭sensitive data.‬

‭9‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭●‬ ‭Impact:‬ ‭Mitigation‬ ‭of‬ ‭security‬ ‭risks,‬ ‭ensuring‬ ‭the‬ ‭confidentiality‬‭and‬‭integrity‬
‭of critical organizational information.‬

‭10‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭1.9‬‭Beneficiaries of the System‬
‭The‬ ‭beneficiaries‬ ‭of‬ ‭an‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭(Enterprise‬ ‭Resource‬ ‭Planning)‬ ‭system‬ ‭are‬ ‭diverse‬ ‭and‬ ‭include‬
‭various stakeholders within an organization. Here are key groups of beneficiaries:‬

‭1.‬ ‭Management and Executives:‬


‭●‬ ‭Benefits:‬
‭●‬ ‭Improved decision-making through real-time access to accurate data.‬
‭●‬ ‭Enhanced strategic planning and forecasting capabilities.‬
‭2.‬ ‭Operations and Department Heads:‬
‭●‬ ‭Benefits:‬
‭●‬ ‭Streamlined and automated business processes.‬
‭●‬ ‭Cross-functional collaboration and communication.‬
‭3.‬ ‭IT Department:‬
‭●‬ ‭Benefits:‬
‭●‬ ‭Improved technical infrastructure and data management.‬
‭●‬ ‭Enhanced security measures and data integrity.‬
‭4.‬ ‭Employees:‬
‭●‬ ‭Benefits:‬
‭●‬ ‭Simplified and standardized processes, reducing manual tasks.‬
‭●‬ ‭Increased job satisfaction through improved work efficiency.‬
‭5.‬ ‭Customers:‬
‭●‬ ‭Benefits:‬
‭●‬ ‭Improved customer service through streamlined processes.‬
‭●‬ ‭Accurate order processing and fulfilment.‬
‭6.‬ ‭Investors and Shareholders:‬
‭●‬ ‭Benefits:‬
‭●‬ ‭Increased confidence in the organization's ability to manage resources.‬
‭●‬ ‭Potential for increased shareholder value through operational efficiency.‬

‭11‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭1.10‬ ‭Software Requirement Specifications‬
‭Writing‬ ‭a‬ ‭Software‬ ‭Requirements‬ ‭Specification‬ ‭(SRS)‬ ‭is‬ ‭a‬ ‭critical‬ ‭step‬ ‭in‬ ‭the‬ ‭software‬
‭development‬ ‭process.‬ ‭The‬ ‭SRS‬ ‭document‬ ‭serves‬ ‭as‬ ‭a‬ ‭blueprint‬ ‭for‬ ‭the‬ ‭development‬ ‭team,‬
‭outlining what the software is supposed to achieve and how it should function.‬

‭Business Rules:‬

‭1.‬ ‭Data Integrity:‬

‭●‬ ‭Business‬‭Rule:‬‭All‬‭data‬‭entered,‬‭the‬‭ERP‬‭system‬‭must‬‭adhere‬‭to‬‭predefined‬‭data‬
‭integrity standards to ensure accuracy and consistency.‬

‭●‬ ‭Enforcement:‬ ‭The‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭system‬ ‭will‬ ‭include‬ ‭validation‬ ‭checks‬ ‭to‬ ‭enforce‬ ‭data‬
‭integrity rules during data entry.‬

‭2.‬ ‭User Authentication:‬

‭●‬ ‭Business‬‭Rule:‬‭User‬‭access‬‭to‬‭different‬‭modules‬‭within‬‭the‬‭ERP‬‭system‬‭is‬‭based‬
‭on predefined roles, and authentication is required for system entry.‬

‭●‬ ‭Enforcement:‬ ‭The‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭system‬ ‭will‬ ‭implement‬ ‭secure‬ ‭login‬ ‭credentials‬ ‭and‬
‭role-based access control to protect sensitive information.‬

‭3.‬ ‭Real-Time Updates:‬

‭●‬ ‭Business‬ ‭Rule:‬ ‭All‬ ‭information‬ ‭updates,‬ ‭such‬ ‭as‬ ‭student‬ ‭enrollment,‬ ‭course‬
‭changes, and financial transactions, must be reflected in real-time.‬

‭●‬ ‭Enforcement:‬ ‭The‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭system‬ ‭will‬ ‭utilize‬ ‭a‬ ‭centralized‬ ‭database‬ ‭to‬ ‭ensure‬
‭real-time updates across all modules.‬

‭4.‬ ‭Consistent Communication:‬

‭●‬ ‭Business‬ ‭Rule:‬ ‭The‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭system‬ ‭should‬ ‭facilitate‬ ‭consistent‬ ‭and‬ ‭timely‬
‭communication among students, faculty, and administrators.‬

‭●‬ ‭Enforcement:‬ ‭A‬ ‭communication‬ ‭module‬ ‭within‬ ‭the‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭system‬ ‭will‬ ‭provide‬
‭channels for announcements, notifications, and messages.‬

‭12‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭Functionalities:‬

‭1.‬ ‭Database‬ ‭and‬ ‭UI‬ ‭Creation:‬ ‭Design‬ ‭secure‬ ‭database‬ ‭structure‬ ‭and‬ ‭intuitive‬ ‭user‬
‭interface‬‭.‬

‭2.‬ ‭Student‬ ‭Information‬ ‭System:‬ ‭Manage‬ ‭student‬ ‭profiles,‬ ‭enrollment,‬ ‭and‬ ‭self-service‬
‭updates.‬

‭3.‬ ‭Staff Management System:‬‭Maintain staff details and‬‭enable self-update.‬

‭4.‬ ‭Course‬ ‭and‬ ‭Curriculum‬ ‭Management:‬ ‭Administer‬ ‭course‬ ‭details‬ ‭and‬ ‭facilitate‬
‭faculty submissions.‬

‭5.‬ ‭Attendance‬ ‭Management:‬ ‭Track‬ ‭attendance,‬ ‭generate‬ ‭reports,‬ ‭and‬ ‭facilitate‬ ‭faculty‬
‭marking.‬

‭6.‬ ‭Examination‬ ‭and‬ ‭Grading‬ ‭System‬‭:‬ ‭Manage‬ ‭exams,‬ ‭automate‬ ‭grading,‬ ‭and‬ ‭publish‬
‭results.‬

‭7.‬ ‭Communication‬ ‭and‬ ‭Notification‬ ‭System‬‭:‬ ‭Implement‬ ‭messaging‬‭for‬‭announcements‬


‭and facilitate communication.‬

‭8.‬ ‭Integration‬ ‭with‬ ‭External‬ ‭Systems:‬ ‭Establish‬ ‭seamless‬ ‭integration‬ ‭with‬ ‭external‬
‭systems.‬

‭Problem Statement:‬

‭Title: Transforming College Operations through an Enhanced ERP System‬

‭Problem:‬ ‭The‬ ‭current‬ ‭college‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭system‬ ‭is‬ ‭outdated,‬ ‭causing‬ ‭inefficiencies,‬ ‭and‬ ‭hindering‬
‭the‬‭seamless‬‭management‬‭of‬‭academic‬‭and‬‭administrative‬‭processes.‬‭Manual‬‭data‬‭entry,‬‭lack‬‭of‬
‭real-time‬ ‭updates,‬ ‭and‬ ‭disjointed‬ ‭communication‬ ‭channels‬ ‭contribute‬ ‭to‬ ‭a‬ ‭suboptimal‬ ‭user‬
‭experience for students, faculty, and administrators.‬

‭Challenges:‬

‭●‬ ‭Inconsistent and manual management of student and staff information.‬

‭●‬ ‭Cumbersome processes for course and curriculum management.‬

‭●‬ ‭Inefficient attendance tracking and examination grading.‬

‭●‬ ‭Fee-related transactions are not user-friendly.‬

‭13‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭●‬ ‭Limited communication channels and notifications.‬

‭●‬ ‭Lack of integration with external systems hinders overall efficiency.‬

‭Objectives:‬ ‭The‬ ‭goal‬ ‭is‬ ‭to‬ ‭implement‬ ‭an‬ ‭upgraded‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭system‬ ‭that‬ ‭addresses‬ ‭these‬
‭challenges,‬‭introducing‬‭a‬‭centralized‬‭and‬‭user-friendly‬‭platform.‬‭This‬‭enhanced‬‭system‬‭aims‬‭to‬
‭improve‬ ‭data‬ ‭accuracy,‬ ‭streamline‬ ‭administrative‬ ‭processes,‬ ‭and‬ ‭enhance‬ ‭communication‬
‭across‬ ‭the‬ ‭college‬ ‭community.‬ ‭The‬ ‭new‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭system‬ ‭will‬ ‭be‬ ‭designed‬ ‭to‬ ‭meet‬ ‭the‬ ‭evolving‬
‭needs of the college and ensure a seamless experience for all stakeholders.‬

‭1.11‬ ‭Software Development Model‬

‭Choosing‬ ‭an‬ ‭appropriate‬ ‭software‬ ‭development‬ ‭model‬ ‭for‬ ‭an‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭(Enterprise‬ ‭Resource‬
‭Planning)‬ ‭system‬ ‭is‬ ‭crucial‬ ‭for‬ ‭the‬ ‭success‬ ‭of‬ ‭the‬ ‭project.‬ ‭The‬ ‭choice‬ ‭often‬ ‭depends‬ ‭on‬
‭factors‬ ‭such‬ ‭as‬ ‭project‬‭size,‬‭complexity,‬‭requirements‬‭clarity,‬‭and‬‭the‬‭development‬‭team's‬
‭familiarity‬‭with‬‭the‬‭model.‬‭Here‬‭we‬‭are‬‭using‬‭Evolutionary‬‭Prototype‬‭Model‬‭as‬‭software‬
‭development model for our ERP project:‬

‭Evolutionary‬ ‭Prototype‬ ‭Model:‬‭The‬ ‭Evolutionary‬ ‭Prototype‬ ‭Model‬ ‭is‬ ‭a‬


‭combination‬‭of ‬‭Iterative ‬‭and ‭I‬ ncremental‬‭model‬‭of‬‭software‬‭development‬‭life‬‭cycle.‬‭It‬‭is‬‭an‬
‭iterative‬‭software‬‭development‬‭model‬‭that‬‭involves‬‭the‬‭creation‬‭of‬‭a‬‭working‬‭prototype‬‭of‬
‭the‬‭system‬‭in‬‭small,‬‭incremental‬‭cycles.‬‭This‬‭prototype‬‭is‬‭continually‬‭refined‬‭and‬‭improved‬
‭based‬ ‭on‬ ‭feedback‬ ‭from‬ ‭stakeholders,‬ ‭leading‬ ‭to‬ ‭the‬ ‭development‬ ‭of‬ ‭a‬ ‭fully‬ ‭functional‬
‭system.‬

‭Phases of Evolutionary Prototype Model:‬

‭1.‬ ‭Requirements Gathering:‬

‭●‬ ‭Initial requirements collected through stakeholder discussions.‬


‭●‬ ‭Focus on capturing essential system features.‬
‭2.‬ ‭Quick Design:‬
‭●‬ ‭Basic system design provides a visual representation.‬
‭●‬ ‭Includes key components and interactions.‬
‭3.‬ ‭Prototype Development:‬
‭●‬ ‭Working prototype developed based on quick design.‬
‭14‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭●‬ ‭Showcases core functionalities.‬

‭15‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭4.‬ ‭User Evaluation:‬
‭●‬ ‭Prototype presented to stakeholders for feedback.‬
‭●‬ ‭Users interact to provide usability and functionality feedback.‬
‭5.‬ ‭Refinement Iterations:‬
‭●‬ ‭Development team iteratively enhances prototype based on feedback.‬
‭●‬ ‭Each iteration refines and adds features.‬
‭6.‬ ‭Incremental Development:‬
‭●‬ ‭New features incrementally added to evolving prototype.‬
‭●‬ ‭Development cycles build upon previous iterations.‬
‭7.‬ ‭System Integration:‬
‭●‬ ‭Integrated components combined into cohesive system.‬
‭●‬ ‭System-wide testing ensures seamless functionality.‬
‭8.‬ ‭Deployment:‬
‭●‬ ‭Thoroughly tested system deployed for use.‬
‭●‬ ‭Users trained and remaining issues addressed.‬
‭9.‬ ‭Continuous Improvement:‬
‭●‬ ‭System continuously improved based on feedback and requirements.‬
‭●‬ ‭Updates and enhancements meet evolving needs.‬

‭Benefits of Using Evolutionary Prototype Model for ERP:‬

‭1.‬ ‭Adaptability to Changing Requirements‬


‭2.‬ ‭Early User Involvement‬
‭3.‬ ‭Risk Mitigation‬
‭4.‬ ‭Quick Delivery of Core Functionality‬
‭5.‬ ‭Reduced Implementation Risk‬
‭6.‬ ‭User Training Alignment‬

‭7.‬ ‭Continuous Improvement Post-Deployment‬


‭Implementing‬ ‭the‬ ‭Evolutionary‬‭Prototype‬‭Model‬‭in‬‭ERP‬‭development‬‭allows‬‭organizations‬‭to‬
‭build‬‭a‬‭system‬‭that‬‭is‬‭not‬‭only‬‭aligned‬‭with‬‭current‬‭requirements‬‭but‬‭is‬‭also‬‭adaptable‬‭to‬‭future‬
‭changes, fostering a more resilient and user-friendly ERP environment.‬

‭16‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭Figure-1.1: Evolutionary Prototype Model‬

‭17‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭1.12‬ ‭Methodology‬
‭Developing‬ ‭an‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭(Enterprise‬ ‭Resource‬ ‭Planning)‬ ‭system‬ ‭using‬ ‭an‬ ‭agile‬ ‭and‬ ‭interactive‬
‭methodology‬‭involves‬‭iterative‬‭development,‬‭close‬‭collaboration‬‭with‬‭stakeholders,‬‭and‬‭a‬‭focus‬
‭on delivering incremental value.‬

‭Agile and Interactive Methodology:‬

‭The‬‭combination‬‭of‬‭Agile‬‭and‬‭an‬‭interactive‬‭approach‬‭often‬‭implies‬‭a‬‭development‬‭process‬‭that‬
‭incorporates the principles of both methodologies. In such a scenario:‬

‭●‬ ‭Iterative‬ ‭Development:‬ ‭The‬ ‭project‬ ‭progresses‬ ‭through‬ ‭iterative‬ ‭cycles,‬ ‭allowing‬ ‭for‬
‭continuous improvement and adaptation.‬

‭●‬ ‭Regular‬‭Stakeholder‬‭Interaction:‬‭Stakeholders,‬‭including‬‭users,‬‭are‬‭actively‬‭involved‬
‭in‬ ‭the‬ ‭development‬ ‭process,‬ ‭providing‬ ‭feedback,‬ ‭and‬ ‭steering‬ ‭the‬ ‭direction‬ ‭of‬ ‭the‬
‭project.‬

‭●‬ ‭Flexibility:‬ ‭The‬ ‭development‬ ‭team‬ ‭is‬ ‭responsive‬ ‭to‬ ‭changing‬ ‭requirements,‬ ‭and‬ ‭the‬
‭project adapts to evolving needs.‬

‭●‬ ‭Continuous‬ ‭Delivery:‬ ‭The‬ ‭product‬ ‭is‬ ‭delivered‬ ‭incrementally,‬ ‭and‬ ‭each‬ ‭delivery‬
‭incorporates feedback to enhance subsequent iterations.‬

‭While‬‭not‬‭a‬‭specific‬‭named‬‭methodology,‬‭the‬‭combination‬‭of‬‭Agile‬‭and‬‭an‬‭interactive‬‭approach‬
‭reflects‬‭a‬‭dynamic‬‭and‬‭collaborative‬‭development‬‭process‬‭that‬‭aims‬‭to‬‭create‬‭a‬‭product‬‭closely‬
‭aligned with user expectations.‬

‭1.13‬ ‭Scope and Limitation of the Project‬

‭Scope of ERP System:‬

‭1.‬ ‭Comprehensive Business Integration:‬


‭●‬ ‭The‬ ‭ERP‬‭system‬‭aims‬‭to‬‭integrate‬‭various‬‭business‬‭functions‬‭seamlessly,‬‭covering‬
‭areas‬ ‭such‬ ‭as‬ ‭finance,‬ ‭human‬ ‭resources,‬ ‭supply‬ ‭chain‬ ‭management,‬ ‭procurement,‬
‭manufacturing, and customer relationship management.‬
‭2.‬ ‭Real-time Data Access:‬

‭18‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭●‬ ‭The‬ ‭system‬ ‭facilitates‬ ‭real-time‬ ‭data‬ ‭access,‬ ‭allowing‬ ‭users‬ ‭to‬ ‭make‬ ‭informed‬
‭decisions‬ ‭based‬ ‭on‬ ‭up-to-date‬ ‭information,‬ ‭enhancing‬ ‭organizational‬ ‭agility‬ ‭and‬
‭responsiveness.‬

‭19‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭3.‬ ‭Standardized Processes:‬
‭●‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭promotes‬ ‭standardized‬ ‭processes‬ ‭across‬ ‭different‬ ‭departments,‬ ‭streamlining‬
‭operations‬ ‭and‬ ‭ensuring‬ ‭consistency‬ ‭in‬ ‭workflows,‬ ‭thereby‬ ‭reducing‬ ‭redundancy,‬
‭and improving overall efficiency.‬
‭4.‬ ‭Enhanced Reporting and Analytics:‬
‭●‬ ‭The‬ ‭system‬ ‭provides‬ ‭robust‬ ‭reporting‬ ‭and‬ ‭analytics‬ ‭capabilities,‬ ‭offering‬ ‭insights‬
‭into‬ ‭key‬ ‭performance‬ ‭indicators‬ ‭(KPIs)‬ ‭and‬ ‭supporting‬ ‭data-driven‬
‭decision-making.‬
‭5.‬ ‭Integration with External Systems:‬
‭●‬ ‭The‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭system‬ ‭includes‬ ‭the‬ ‭capability‬ ‭to‬ ‭integrate‬ ‭with‬ ‭external‬ ‭systems,‬
‭fostering‬ ‭interoperability‬ ‭and‬ ‭data‬ ‭exchange‬ ‭with‬ ‭other‬ ‭tools‬ ‭or‬ ‭platforms‬ ‭used‬
‭within the organization's ecosystem.‬
‭6.‬ ‭Mobile Accessibility:‬
‭●‬ ‭The‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭system‬ ‭ensures‬ ‭mobile‬ ‭accessibility,‬ ‭allowing‬ ‭users‬ ‭to‬ ‭access‬ ‭critical‬
‭information‬ ‭and‬ ‭perform‬ ‭tasks‬ ‭on-the-go,‬ ‭enhancing‬ ‭user‬ ‭productivity‬ ‭and‬
‭responsiveness.‬

‭Limitations of ERP System:‬

‭1.‬ ‭High Implementation Costs:‬


‭●‬ ‭One‬ ‭of‬ ‭the‬ ‭major‬ ‭limitations‬ ‭of‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭systems‬ ‭is‬ ‭the‬ ‭high‬ ‭initial‬ ‭implementation‬
‭cost.‬ ‭This‬ ‭includes‬ ‭software‬ ‭licensing,‬ ‭hardware‬ ‭infrastructure,‬ ‭and‬ ‭costs‬
‭associated with training and consulting.‬
‭2.‬ ‭Complexity and Time-Consuming Implementation:‬
‭●‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭implementation‬ ‭can‬ ‭be‬ ‭complex‬ ‭and‬ ‭time-consuming.‬ ‭It‬ ‭requires‬ ‭careful‬
‭planning,‬ ‭customization,‬ ‭and‬ ‭extensive‬ ‭training‬ ‭for‬ ‭users,‬ ‭which‬ ‭may‬ ‭disrupt‬
‭regular business operations.‬
‭3.‬ ‭Resistance to Change:‬
‭●‬ ‭Employees‬ ‭may‬ ‭resist‬ ‭the‬ ‭significant‬ ‭changes‬ ‭introduced‬ ‭by‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭systems.‬
‭Resistance‬ ‭to‬ ‭change‬ ‭can‬ ‭affect‬ ‭the‬ ‭smooth‬ ‭adoption‬ ‭of‬ ‭the‬ ‭system,‬ ‭requiring‬
‭effective change management strategies.‬
‭4.‬ ‭Customization Challenges:‬
‭●‬ ‭While‬‭ERP‬‭systems‬‭offer‬‭a‬‭range‬‭of‬‭modules,‬‭organizations‬‭with‬‭unique‬‭processes‬
‭may‬ ‭face‬ ‭challenges‬ ‭in‬ ‭customizing‬ ‭the‬ ‭system‬ ‭to‬ ‭align‬ ‭with‬ ‭their‬ ‭specific‬
‭requirements.‬

‭20‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭21‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭5.‬ ‭Data Security Concerns:‬
‭●‬ ‭The‬ ‭consolidation‬ ‭of‬ ‭data‬ ‭in‬ ‭a‬ ‭centralized‬ ‭system‬ ‭raises‬ ‭concerns‬ ‭about‬ ‭data‬
‭security.‬ ‭Organizations‬ ‭need‬ ‭to‬ ‭implement‬ ‭robust‬‭security‬‭measures‬‭to‬‭safeguard‬
‭sensitive information.‬
‭6.‬ ‭Scalability Issues:‬
‭●‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭systems‬ ‭may‬ ‭encounter‬ ‭scalability‬ ‭issues‬ ‭as‬ ‭the‬ ‭organization‬ ‭grows.‬ ‭The‬
‭system‬‭must‬‭be‬‭able‬‭to‬‭adapt‬‭to‬‭increased‬‭data‬‭volume‬‭and‬‭transaction‬‭complexity‬
‭to remain effective.‬
‭7.‬ ‭Data Migration Challenges:‬
‭●‬ ‭The‬ ‭process‬ ‭of‬ ‭migrating‬ ‭existing‬ ‭data‬ ‭to‬ ‭the‬ ‭new‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭system‬ ‭can‬ ‭pose‬
‭challenges.‬ ‭Inaccurate‬ ‭or‬ ‭incomplete‬ ‭data‬ ‭migration‬ ‭can‬‭impact‬‭the‬‭reliability‬‭of‬
‭the system and hinder its functionality.‬

‭1.14‬ ‭Tasks of the Team Members in the Project‬


‭In‬ ‭an‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭project‬ ‭with‬ ‭a‬‭team‬‭of‬‭4‬‭members,‬‭where‬‭2‬‭are‬‭responsible‬‭for‬‭the‬‭backend‬‭(using‬
‭Django)‬ ‭and‬‭2‬‭for‬‭the‬‭frontend‬‭(using‬‭HTML,‬‭CSS,‬‭and‬‭JavaScript),‬‭tasks‬‭are‬‭allocated‬‭based‬
‭on their expertise. Here is a detailed breakdown of tasks for each team member:‬

‭Backend Team:‬

‭1. Backend Developer 1: Hitansh Gupta‬

‭●‬ ‭Database‬ ‭Design:‬ ‭Design‬ ‭the‬ ‭database‬ ‭schema‬ ‭for‬ ‭the‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭system,‬ ‭considering‬
‭modules like finance, human resources, supply chain, etc.‬

‭●‬ ‭Data‬ ‭Model‬ ‭Implementation:‬ ‭Implement‬ ‭the‬ ‭database‬ ‭structure‬ ‭using‬ ‭the‬ ‭chosen‬
‭database management system (e.g., MySQL, PostgreSQL).‬

‭●‬ ‭Backend‬ ‭Logic:‬‭Develop‬ ‭backend‬ ‭logic‬‭for‬‭core‬‭functionalities‬‭such‬‭as‬‭data‬‭retrieval,‬


‭storage, and manipulation.‬

‭2. Backend Developer 2: Deepanshu Bisht‬

‭●‬ ‭Server-Side‬ ‭Development:‬ ‭Implement‬ ‭server-side‬ ‭functionality‬ ‭using‬ ‭Django,‬ ‭the‬


‭chosen backend framework.‬

‭22‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭●‬ ‭API‬ ‭Development:‬ ‭Develop‬ ‭APIs‬ ‭to‬ ‭facilitate‬ ‭communication‬ ‭between‬ ‭the‬ ‭frontend‬
‭and backend components.‬

‭●‬ ‭Integration‬‭with‬‭External‬‭Systems:‬‭Implement‬‭any‬‭required‬‭integrations‬‭with‬‭external‬
‭systems or services.‬

‭Frontend Team:‬

‭3. Frontend Developer 1: Himanshu Gupta‬

‭●‬ ‭UI/UX‬ ‭Design:‬ ‭Design‬ ‭the‬ ‭user‬ ‭interface‬ ‭to‬ ‭ensure‬ ‭a‬ ‭visually‬ ‭appealing‬ ‭and‬
‭user-friendly experience.‬

‭●‬ ‭Frontend‬ ‭Architecture:‬‭Define‬ ‭the‬ ‭overall‬ ‭frontend‬ ‭architecture,‬ ‭incorporating‬‭React‬


‭components for modularity.‬

‭●‬ ‭Module‬ ‭Implementation:‬ ‭Implement‬ ‭frontend‬ ‭modules‬ ‭for‬ ‭specific‬ ‭functionalities‬


‭(e.g., finance, human resources) following the design guidelines.‬

‭4. Frontend Developer 2: Pranav Garg‬

‭●‬ ‭User‬ ‭Interaction:‬ ‭Implement‬ ‭interactive‬ ‭features‬ ‭and‬ ‭user‬ ‭input‬ ‭validations‬ ‭using‬
‭HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.‬

‭●‬ ‭Integration‬ ‭with‬ ‭Backend:‬‭Integrate‬ ‭the‬ ‭frontend‬‭with‬‭the‬‭backend‬‭using‬‭the‬‭defined‬


‭APIs.‬

‭Collaborative Tasks:‬

‭5. Team Collaboration:‬

‭●‬ ‭Regular‬‭Meetings:‬‭Conduct‬‭regular‬‭team‬‭meetings‬‭to‬‭discuss‬‭progress,‬‭challenges,‬‭and‬
‭upcoming tasks.‬

‭●‬ ‭Code‬ ‭Reviews:‬ ‭Conduct‬ ‭code‬ ‭reviews‬ ‭to‬ ‭ensure‬ ‭code‬ ‭quality,‬ ‭adherence‬ ‭to‬ ‭coding‬
‭standards, and knowledge sharing.‬

‭●‬ ‭Documentation:‬ ‭Collaboratively‬ ‭document‬ ‭the‬ ‭system‬ ‭architecture,‬ ‭APIs,‬ ‭and‬ ‭any‬
‭significant design decisions.‬

‭23‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭1.15‬ ‭Time Schedule for the Project‬

‭Here are the processes that are involved in our ERP System:‬
‭Process A:‬‭User Interface‬
‭Process B:‬‭Database Management‬
‭Process C:‬‭Student Information System (Dependent on‬‭Process B)‬
‭Process D:‬‭Staff Management System (Dependent on Process‬‭B)‬
‭Process E:‬‭Course and Curriculum Management (Dependent‬‭on Process C)‬
‭Process F:‬‭Attendance Management (Dependent on Process‬‭B & C)‬
‭Process G:‬‭Examination & Grading System (Dependent‬‭on Process B, E & F)‬
‭Process H:‬‭Communication & Notification System (Dependent‬‭on Process D)‬
‭Process I:‬‭Security & Access Control (Dependent on‬‭Process C)‬

‭Below‬ ‭is‬ ‭a‬ ‭time‬ ‭schedule‬ ‭for‬ ‭the‬ ‭College‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭project,‬ ‭considering‬ ‭a‬ ‭40-day‬ ‭duration‬ ‭from‬
‭October‬‭1,‬‭2023,‬‭to‬‭November‬‭10,‬‭2023.‬‭This‬‭schedule‬‭outlines‬‭the‬‭start‬‭and‬‭end‬‭dates‬‭for‬‭each‬
‭task:‬

‭Figure-1.2: Time Schedule of the Project‬

‭This‬ ‭schedule‬ ‭represents‬ ‭the‬ ‭planned‬ ‭start‬ ‭and‬ ‭end‬ ‭dates‬ ‭for‬ ‭each‬ ‭task‬ ‭based‬ ‭on‬ ‭the‬
‭specified duration.‬

‭24‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭1.15.1‬ ‭Gantt Chart‬
‭Creating‬ ‭a‬ ‭Gantt‬ ‭Chart‬ ‭for‬ ‭the‬ ‭Software‬‭Development‬‭Life‬‭Cycle‬‭(SDLC)‬‭with‬‭the‬‭given‬
‭processes‬‭involves‬‭outlining‬‭the‬‭tasks,‬‭dependencies,‬‭and‬‭timeline‬‭for‬‭each‬‭process.‬‭Below‬
‭is a simplified Gantt Chart for the provided processes.‬

‭Figure-1.3: Gantt Chart‬


‭In this Gantt Chart:‬
‭●‬ ‭Each task is represented by a horizontal bar.‬
‭●‬ ‭The length of the bar corresponds to the task duration.‬
‭●‬ ‭Dependencies are shown by the sequence of tasks.‬

‭The‬ ‭Gantt‬ ‭Chart‬ ‭provides‬ ‭a‬ ‭visual‬ ‭representation‬ ‭of‬ ‭the‬ ‭project‬ ‭schedule,‬ ‭helping‬ ‭in‬
‭tracking progress and managing dependencies effectively.‬

‭1.15.2‬ ‭PERT Chart‬


‭A‬‭Program‬‭Evaluation‬‭and‬‭Review‬‭Technique‬‭(PERT)‬‭chart‬‭is‬‭a‬‭visual‬‭representation‬‭of‬‭a‬
‭project's‬ ‭tasks‬ ‭and‬ ‭their‬ ‭dependencies.‬ ‭PERT‬ ‭charts‬‭are‬‭used‬‭to‬‭represent‬‭and‬‭analyse‬‭the‬
‭tasks‬‭and‬‭dependencies‬‭in‬‭a‬‭project.‬‭Below‬‭is‬‭a‬‭simplified‬‭PERT‬‭chart‬‭for‬‭the‬‭College‬‭ERP‬
‭project based on the provided tasks, durations, and dependencies.‬

‭25‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭Figure-1.4: PERT Chart‬
‭In this PERT chart:‬
‭●‬ ‭Tasks are represented as nodes.‬
‭●‬ ‭Arrows represent dependencies between tasks.‬
‭●‬ ‭The chart starts with the "Start" node and ends with the "End" node.‬
‭The‬ ‭chart‬ ‭helps‬ ‭visualize‬ ‭the‬ ‭sequence‬ ‭of‬ ‭tasks‬ ‭and‬ ‭their‬ ‭dependencies.‬ ‭Critical‬ ‭paths,‬
‭which‬‭are‬‭the‬‭longest‬‭paths‬‭through‬‭the‬‭network,‬‭can‬‭be‬‭identified‬‭by‬‭analysing‬‭the‬‭chart.‬
‭Critical paths indicate the minimum time required to complete the project.‬

‭1.15.3‬ ‭Critical Method Path‬


‭The‬ ‭Critical‬ ‭Path‬ ‭Method‬ ‭(CPM)‬ ‭is‬ ‭a‬ ‭project‬ ‭management‬‭technique‬‭used‬‭to‬‭identify‬‭the‬
‭sequence‬ ‭of‬ ‭tasks‬ ‭that‬ ‭determine‬ ‭the‬ ‭overall‬ ‭duration‬ ‭of‬ ‭a‬ ‭project.‬ ‭The‬ ‭critical‬ ‭path‬
‭represents‬ ‭the‬ ‭longest‬ ‭path‬ ‭through‬ ‭a‬ ‭network‬ ‭diagram‬ ‭and‬ ‭identifies‬ ‭the‬ ‭minimum‬ ‭time‬
‭needed‬ ‭to‬ ‭complete‬ ‭the‬ ‭project.‬ ‭In‬ ‭the‬‭context‬‭of‬‭the‬‭College‬‭ERP‬‭project,‬‭let‬‭us‬‭identify‬
‭the critical path based on the tasks, durations, and dependencies provided:‬

‭26‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭Figure-1.5: Critical Path Method‬

‭In this diagram:‬


‭Critical Path:‬‭Start -> A -> D -> F -> G -> H -> End‬

‭In‬‭this‬‭scenario,‬‭the‬‭critical‬‭path‬‭is‬‭the‬‭sequence‬‭of‬‭tasks‬‭that‬‭collectively‬‭take‬‭the‬‭longest‬
‭time‬‭to‬‭complete.‬‭Any‬‭delay‬‭in‬‭a‬‭task‬‭along‬‭the‬‭critical‬‭path‬‭will‬‭directly‬‭impact‬‭the‬‭overall‬
‭project‬‭timeline.‬‭Other‬‭non-critical‬‭tasks‬‭may‬‭have‬‭some‬‭flexibility‬‭in‬‭their‬‭start‬‭and‬‭finish‬
‭dates without affecting the project's total duration.‬

‭1.16‬ ‭Cost and Effort Measurement‬


‭COCOMO‬ ‭(Constructive‬ ‭Cost‬ ‭Model)‬ ‭is‬ ‭a‬ ‭widely‬ ‭used‬ ‭software‬ ‭cost‬ ‭estimation‬ ‭model‬
‭developed‬ ‭by‬ ‭Barry‬ ‭Boehm.‬ ‭COCOMO‬ ‭has‬ ‭three‬ ‭levels‬ ‭of‬‭estimation:‬‭Basic,‬‭Intermediate,‬
‭and‬ ‭Detailed‬‭.‬ ‭Here,‬ ‭we‬ ‭are‬ ‭using‬ ‭the‬ ‭Intermediate‬ ‭level‬‭.‬ ‭The‬ ‭Intermediate‬ ‭COCOMO‬
‭model‬‭is further divided into three categories:‬‭Organic,‬‭Semi Detached, and Embedded‬‭.‬

‭In‬ ‭our‬ ‭case,‬ ‭we‬ ‭are‬‭interested‬‭in‬‭the‬‭Semi-Detached‬‭category‬‭.‬‭The‬‭Semidetached‬‭category‬‭is‬


‭applicable‬‭to‬‭projects‬‭that‬‭fall‬‭between‬‭the‬‭characteristics‬‭of‬‭organic‬‭and‬‭embedded‬‭projects.‬‭It‬
‭assumes a moderate level of complexity.‬

‭Effort Measurement:‬

‭The Intermediate COCOMO model formula for effort and duration is as follows:‬

‭27‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭Effort‬‭=‭A
‬ ‭×
‬ (‬‭Size‬‭)‭B
‬ ‬‭×‭E
‬ AF‬

‭Duration‬‭=‭C
‬ ‬‭×(‬‭Effort‬‭)‬‭D‬

‭Where:‬

‭●‬ ‭ ize‬ ‭is‬ ‭the‬ ‭estimated‬ ‭size‬ ‭of‬ ‭the‬ ‭software‬ ‭in‬ ‭delivered‬ ‭source‬ ‭instructions‬ ‭(KLOC‬ ‭-‬
S
‭Thousand Lines of Code).‬
‭●‬ ‭EAF‬‭is the Effort Adjustment Factor based on various‬‭project attributes.‬
‭●‬ ‭ ‭,‬‬‭B‭,‬‬‭C‭,‬‬‭and‬‭D‬‭,‬‭are‬‭constants‬‭that‬‭depend‬‭on‬‭the‬‭project‬‭type‬‭(organic,‬‭semi-detached,‬‭or‬
A
‭embedded).‬
‭The specific values of‬‭A‭,‬‬‭B‬‭,‬‭C‭,‬ and‬‭D‬‭for the Semi-Detached‬‭category‬‭are as follows:‬

‭●‬ ‭A‬‭=3.0‬
‭●‬ ‭B‬‭=1.12‬
‭●‬ ‭C‭=
‬ 2.5‬
‭●‬ ‭D‬‭=0.35‬

‭Project Calculation:‬
‭In our project, the‬‭Size‬‭is 10K LOC and for‬‭EAF:‬

‭1.‬ ‭Required Software Reliability (RELY):‬‭High (Rating:‬‭3)‬


‭2.‬ ‭Database Size (DATA):‬‭Moderate (e.g., 100 KB) (Rating:‬‭2)‬
‭3.‬ ‭Product Complexity (CPLX):‬‭Very High (Rating: 4)‬
‭4.‬ ‭Developed for Reusability (RUSE):‬‭Nominal (Rating:‬‭1)‬
‭5.‬ ‭Documentation Match to Life-Cycle Needs (DOCU):‬‭High‬‭(Rating: 3)‬
‭6.‬ ‭Execution Time Constraint (TIME):‬‭Moderate (Rating:‬‭2)‬
‭7.‬ ‭Main Storage Constraint (STOR):‬‭Low (Rating: 1)‬
‭8.‬ ‭Platform Volatility (PVOL):‬‭Nominal (Rating: 1)‬
‭9.‬ ‭Analyst Capability (ACAP):‬‭High (Rating: 3)‬
‭10.‬‭Programmer Capability (PCAP):‬‭Very High (Rating: 4)‬
‭Now, let us calculate the EAF using these values:‬

‭⇨‬ ‭EAF = (100(3+2+4+1+3+2+1+1+3+4)​)b‬

‭Let us assume‬‭b‬‭=0.91 (an arbitrary exponent value).‬

‭EAF = (0.22)‬‭0.91‬

‭28‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭EAF ≈ 0.806‬
‭Therefore,‬

‭⇨‬ ‭Effort‬‭=‬‭A‬‭× (‬‭Size‬‭)‬‭B‬‭×‬‭EAF‬

‭⇨‬ ‭Effort‬‭= 3.0 × (10) 1.12 × 0.806‬


‭⇨‬ ‭Effort‬‭= 27.0816 Person - Months‬

‭⇨‬ ‭Duration‬‭=‬‭C‬‭× (‬‭Effort‬‭)‬‭D‬

‭⇨‬ ‭Duration‬‭= 2.5 × (27.0816) 0.35‬

‭⇨‬ ‭Duration‬‭= 24 Months‬

‭Cost Measurement:‬

‭Calculating‬‭the‬‭cost‬‭in‬‭the‬‭context‬‭of‬‭software‬‭development‬‭using‬‭the‬‭COCOMO‬‭(Constructive‬
‭Cost‬‭Model)‬‭involves‬‭estimating‬‭the‬‭effort‬‭required‬‭and‬‭then‬‭applying‬‭cost‬‭factors‬‭to‬‭determine‬
‭the‬‭overall‬‭project‬‭cost.‬‭The‬‭COCOMO‬‭model‬‭provides‬‭a‬‭systematic‬‭way‬‭to‬‭estimate‬‭software‬
‭development‬‭effort‬‭and,‬‭subsequently,‬‭cost.‬‭The‬‭formula‬‭for‬‭calculating‬‭cost‬‭in‬‭the‬‭COCOMO‬
‭model is as follows:‬

‭Cost = Effort × Staffing × Salary‬

‭Here:‬

‭●‬ ‭Effort‬‭is the total person-months required for the‬‭project.‬

‭●‬ ‭Staffing‬‭is the number of personnel required for the‬‭project.‬

‭●‬ ‭Salary‬‭is the average monthly salary per person.‬

‭Project Calculation:‬

‭In our project, the‬‭Effort‬‭is‬ ‭, Staffing‬ ‭is 4 and‬‭Salary‬‭is Rs. 20,000‬

‭Therefore,‬

‭⇨‬ ‭Cost = Effort × Staffing × Salary‬


‭⇨‬ ‭Cost = 27.0816 × 4 × 10000‬
‭⇨‬ ‭Cost = ₹ 10,83,264‬
‭29‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭CHAPTER TWO‬

‭2.‬ ‭LITERATURE REVIEW‬

‭2.1‬‭Literature Review‬
‭Enterprise‬‭Resource‬‭Planning‬‭(ERP)‬‭systems‬‭play‬‭a‬‭vital‬‭role‬‭in‬‭modern‬‭organizational‬
‭management,‬ ‭integrating‬ ‭diverse‬ ‭business‬ ‭processes.‬ ‭This‬ ‭section‬ ‭explores‬ ‭existing‬
‭literature,‬ ‭case‬ ‭studies,‬ ‭and‬ ‭research‬ ‭on‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭systems,‬ ‭focusing‬ ‭on‬ ‭their‬ ‭evolution,‬
‭implementation‬ ‭challenges,‬ ‭benefits,‬ ‭and‬ ‭future‬ ‭trends.‬ ‭Understanding‬ ‭these‬‭aspects‬‭is‬
‭essential for contributing to the ongoing discourse in this dynamic field.‬
‭What Is a Higher Education ERP System?‬
‭ERP‬ ‭systems‬ ‭have‬ ‭been‬ ‭tailored‬ ‭for‬ ‭higher‬ ‭education‬ ‭institutions,‬ ‭aiding‬ ‭in‬‭managing‬
‭business‬ ‭workflows‬ ‭and‬ ‭streamlining‬ ‭information‬ ‭across‬ ‭functions‬ ‭and‬ ‭departments.‬
‭They‬‭impact‬‭academic‬‭resource‬‭planning,‬‭student‬‭lifecycle‬‭automation,‬‭and‬‭lecturer‬‭task‬
‭management.‬ ‭These‬ ‭systems‬ ‭facilitate‬ ‭digitization‬ ‭in‬ ‭line‬ ‭with‬ ‭global‬ ‭digital‬
‭transformation trends.‬

‭Why ERP In the Education Sector?‬


‭Implementing‬‭the‬‭ERP‬‭system‬‭in‬‭higher‬‭education‬‭improves‬‭productivity‬‭and‬‭efficiency‬
‭and has many other benefits for institutions. These include:‬
‭●‬ ‭Enhanced‬‭Control‬‭–‬‭with‬‭a‬‭centralised‬‭database‬‭and‬‭all‬‭information‬‭necessary‬‭at‬‭your‬
‭fingertips,‬ ‭this‬ ‭software‬ ‭solution‬ ‭will‬ ‭enable‬ ‭institutions‬ ‭to‬ ‭control‬ ‭all‬ ‭administrative‬
‭processes from one integrated platform.‬
‭●‬ ‭Better‬‭connectivity‬‭–‬‭this‬‭system‬‭aims‬‭to‬‭improve‬‭connectivity‬‭among‬‭all‬‭institutional‬
‭stakeholders,‬ ‭including‬ ‭students,‬ ‭lecturers,‬ ‭parents,‬ ‭and‬ ‭staff.‬ ‭All‬ ‭stakeholders‬ ‭can‬
‭effectively find the information required and receive answers to questions quickly.‬
‭●‬ ‭Smart‬ ‭technology‬‭–‬ ‭the‬ ‭new‬ ‭generation‬ ‭of‬ ‭students‬ ‭is‬ ‭technology-focused,‬ ‭which‬
‭means‬‭that‬‭ERP‬‭systems‬‭must‬‭be‬‭agile‬‭enough‬‭to‬‭move‬‭with‬‭the‬‭times‬‭and‬‭adapt‬‭to‬‭the‬
‭latest‬ ‭technology‬ ‭needs‬ ‭of‬ ‭students,‬ ‭such‬ ‭as‬ ‭the‬ ‭provision‬ ‭for‬ ‭self-service‬ ‭portals‬ ‭and‬
‭remote access to libraries etc. This kind of software makes provision for this.‬

‭30‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭●‬ ‭Streamlined‬ ‭Reporting‬‭–‬ ‭this‬ ‭kind‬ ‭of‬ ‭solution‬ ‭provides‬ ‭streamlined,‬ ‭aligned,‬ ‭and‬
‭integrated‬ ‭reporting‬ ‭capabilities‬ ‭that‬ ‭will‬ ‭allow‬ ‭you‬ ‭to‬ ‭access‬ ‭essential‬ ‭business‬ ‭and‬
‭student‬ ‭analytics‬ ‭related‬ ‭to‬ ‭fees,‬ ‭headcounts,‬ ‭employee‬ ‭records‬ ‭and‬ ‭more‬ ‭in‬ ‭almost‬
‭real-time. Enhancing accuracy and reliability.‬

‭Why is ERP essential to Educational Institutes?‬

‭From an Institution’s Perspective‬

‭An‬‭ERP‬‭system‬‭streamlines‬‭the‬‭institution’s‬‭operations‬‭across‬‭departments‬‭and‬‭tasks.‬‭It‬
‭enables‬‭the‬‭automation‬‭of‬‭different‬‭tasks‬‭to‬‭save‬‭staff‬‭time‬‭and‬‭resources.‬‭For‬‭example,‬
‭automated‬ ‭marketing‬ ‭and‬ ‭communication‬ ‭responses‬ ‭can‬ ‭provide‬ ‭faster‬ ‭responses.‬ ‭Fee‬
‭collections‬ ‭can‬ ‭be‬ ‭automated,‬ ‭as‬ ‭can‬ ‭the‬ ‭admissions‬ ‭process,‬ ‭making‬ ‭both‬ ‭processes‬
‭more‬ ‭efficient.‬ ‭Each‬ ‭of‬ ‭these‬ ‭elements‬ ‭dramatically‬ ‭improves‬ ‭the‬ ‭overall‬ ‭student‬
‭experience,‬ ‭which‬ ‭is‬ ‭critical‬ ‭to‬ ‭growing‬ ‭the‬ ‭business.‬ ‭With‬ ‭an‬ ‭integrated‬ ‭and‬
‭consolidated‬‭ERP‬‭platform,‬‭you‬‭can‬‭also‬‭get‬‭a‬‭faster‬‭comparison‬‭of‬‭department‬‭metrics‬
‭to‬ ‭make‬ ‭informed‬ ‭decisions‬ ‭based‬ ‭on‬ ‭accurate‬ ‭data‬ ‭relating‬ ‭to‬ ‭head‬ ‭counts,‬‭residence‬
‭accommodation, lecture room sizes, equipment requirements and more.‬

‭From a Student Perspective‬

‭An‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭solution‬ ‭brings‬ ‭many‬ ‭different‬ ‭benefits‬ ‭for‬ ‭students.‬ ‭This‬ ‭includes‬ ‭fast‬ ‭and‬
‭efficient‬‭access‬‭to‬‭timetables,‬‭coursework‬‭etc.,‬‭that‬‭can‬‭all‬‭be‬‭accessed‬‭from‬‭self-service‬
‭platforms.‬ ‭This‬ ‭allows‬ ‭students‬ ‭to‬ ‭have‬ ‭a‬ ‭personalized‬ ‭learning‬ ‭experience,‬ ‭ask‬ ‭more‬
‭questions,‬‭engage‬‭with‬‭their‬‭lecturers‬‭more,‬‭and‬‭find‬‭all‬‭the‬‭information‬‭they‬‭need‬‭at‬‭the‬
‭click of a button.‬

‭From a Facility Member Perspective‬

‭From‬ ‭a‬ ‭faculty‬ ‭member’s‬ ‭perspective,‬ ‭using‬ ‭an‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭means‬ ‭saving‬ ‭time‬ ‭on‬ ‭repetitive‬
‭tasks‬ ‭thanks‬ ‭to‬ ‭automation.‬ ‭Faculty‬ ‭can‬ ‭also‬‭quickly‬‭and‬‭effectively‬‭use‬‭the‬‭system‬‭to‬
‭enhance‬‭collaboration‬‭with‬‭students‬‭and‬‭other‬‭departments‬‭and‬‭upload‬‭course‬‭materials,‬
‭submissions‬‭and‬‭gradings‬‭from‬‭one‬‭user-friendly‬‭centralised‬‭system.‬‭This‬‭enhances‬‭the‬
‭overall teaching and learning experience.‬

‭Some popular ERP system used in Educational Institutions in India:‬


‭1.‬ ‭SAP ERP for Education:‬

‭31‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭●‬ ‭Overview:‬ ‭SAP,‬ ‭a‬ ‭globally‬ ‭renowned‬ ‭enterprise‬ ‭software‬ ‭provider,‬ ‭offers‬ ‭a‬
‭specialized‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭solution‬ ‭for‬ ‭the‬ ‭education‬ ‭sector.‬ ‭This‬ ‭system‬ ‭is‬ ‭designed‬ ‭to‬
‭meet‬‭the‬‭diverse‬‭needs‬‭of‬‭educational‬‭institutions,‬‭providing‬‭integrated‬‭modules‬
‭for finance, human resources, and student management.‬
‭●‬ ‭Key Features:‬
‭●‬ ‭Integration‬‭of‬‭Administrative‬‭and‬‭Academic‬‭Processes:‬‭SAP‬‭ERP‬‭for‬
‭Education‬ ‭facilitates‬ ‭seamless‬ ‭integration‬ ‭between‬ ‭administrative‬ ‭and‬
‭academic functions, allowing for efficient information flow.‬
‭●‬ ‭Advanced‬ ‭Analytics‬ ‭and‬ ‭Reporting:‬ ‭The‬ ‭system‬ ‭includes‬ ‭robust‬
‭analytics‬ ‭and‬ ‭reporting‬ ‭tools,‬ ‭empowering‬ ‭institutions‬ ‭to‬ ‭derive‬
‭meaningful insights from data for informed decision-making.‬
‭●‬ ‭Student‬ ‭Lifecycle‬ ‭Management:‬ ‭With‬ ‭dedicated‬ ‭features‬ ‭for‬ ‭student‬
‭lifecycle‬ ‭management,‬ ‭the‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭system‬ ‭supports‬ ‭various‬ ‭stages‬ ‭from‬
‭admission to graduation.‬

‭2.‬ ‭Oracle PeopleSoft Campus Solutions:‬


‭●‬ ‭Overview:‬ ‭Oracle‬ ‭PeopleSoft‬ ‭Campus‬ ‭Solutions‬ ‭is‬ ‭a‬ ‭comprehensive‬ ‭ERP‬
‭system‬ ‭tailored‬ ‭specifically‬ ‭for‬ ‭higher‬ ‭education‬ ‭institutions.‬ ‭It‬ ‭encompasses‬‭a‬
‭wide array of functionalities crucial for colleges and universities.‬

‭●‬ ‭Key Features:‬


‭●‬ ‭Student‬ ‭Administration‬ ‭and‬ ‭Enrollment‬ ‭Management:‬ ‭PeopleSoft‬
‭facilitates‬ ‭effective‬ ‭student‬ ‭administration,‬ ‭including‬ ‭enrollment‬
‭processes and academic record management.‬
‭●‬ ‭Academic‬ ‭Advising‬ ‭and‬ ‭Progress‬ ‭Tracking:‬ ‭The‬ ‭system‬ ‭supports‬
‭academic‬ ‭advising‬ ‭services‬ ‭and‬ ‭enables‬ ‭tracking‬ ‭of‬ ‭student‬ ‭progress,‬
‭ensuring timely interventions.‬
‭●‬ ‭Financial‬ ‭Aid‬ ‭Management:‬ ‭Institutions‬ ‭can‬ ‭manage‬ ‭financial‬ ‭aid‬
‭programs‬ ‭efficiently,‬ ‭ensuring‬ ‭proper‬ ‭distribution‬ ‭and‬ ‭tracking‬ ‭of‬
‭financial support.‬

‭3.‬ ‭Fedena:‬

‭32‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭●‬ ‭Overview:‬ ‭Fedena‬ ‭is‬ ‭an‬ ‭open-source‬ ‭school‬ ‭management‬ ‭software‬ ‭that‬ ‭has‬
‭gained‬‭popularity‬‭in‬‭India,‬‭serving‬‭educational‬‭institutions‬‭ranging‬‭from‬‭schools‬
‭to colleges.‬
‭●‬ ‭Key Features:‬
‭●‬ ‭Student‬‭Information‬‭System:‬‭Fedena‬‭includes‬‭a‬‭comprehensive‬‭student‬
‭information‬ ‭system‬ ‭with‬‭features‬‭like‬‭attendance‬‭tracking‬‭and‬‭academic‬
‭records management.‬
‭●‬ ‭Examination‬ ‭Management‬ ‭and‬ ‭Grading:‬ ‭The‬ ‭system‬ ‭supports‬
‭end-to-end‬‭examination‬‭management,‬‭including‬‭scheduling,‬‭grading,‬‭and‬
‭result processing.‬
‭●‬ ‭Communication‬ ‭and‬ ‭Collaboration‬ ‭Tools:‬ ‭Fedena‬ ‭provides‬ ‭tools‬ ‭for‬
‭effective‬ ‭communication‬‭and‬‭collaboration‬‭among‬‭students,‬‭faculty,‬‭and‬
‭administrators.‬

‭4.‬ ‭eLite SIS (Student Information System):‬


‭●‬ ‭Overview:‬ ‭eLite‬ ‭SIS‬ ‭is‬ ‭a‬ ‭Student‬ ‭Information‬ ‭System‬ ‭designed‬ ‭to‬ ‭meet‬ ‭the‬
‭specific‬ ‭needs‬ ‭of‬ ‭educational‬ ‭institutions‬ ‭in‬ ‭India,‬ ‭offering‬‭features‬‭for‬‭student‬
‭management and academic administration.‬
‭●‬ ‭Key Features:‬
‭●‬ ‭Admission‬ ‭and‬ ‭Enrollment‬ ‭Management:‬ ‭eLite‬ ‭SIS‬ ‭streamlines‬
‭admission‬ ‭and‬ ‭enrollment‬ ‭processes,‬ ‭ensuring‬ ‭a‬ ‭smooth‬ ‭experience‬ ‭for‬
‭both institutions and students.‬
‭●‬ ‭Examination‬ ‭Scheduling‬ ‭and‬ ‭Result‬ ‭Processing:‬ ‭The‬ ‭system‬
‭facilitates‬ ‭efficient‬ ‭examination‬ ‭scheduling‬ ‭and‬ ‭result‬ ‭processing,‬
‭contributing to a transparent and organized assessment process.‬
‭●‬ ‭Financial‬ ‭Management‬ ‭for‬ ‭Fee‬ ‭Collection:‬ ‭eLite‬ ‭SIS‬ ‭includes‬
‭financial‬‭management‬‭capabilities,‬‭particularly‬‭around‬‭fee‬‭collection‬‭and‬
‭related transactions.‬

‭5.‬ ‭Campus Management:‬


‭●‬ ‭Overview:‬ ‭Campus‬ ‭Management‬ ‭provides‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭solutions‬ ‭tailored‬ ‭specifically‬
‭for‬‭higher‬‭education‬‭institutions.‬‭While‬‭it‬‭has‬‭a‬‭stronger‬‭presence‬‭in‬‭the‬‭United‬
‭States, some colleges in India have adopted its systems.‬
‭●‬ ‭Key Features:‬

‭33‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭●‬ ‭Student‬ ‭Lifecycle‬ ‭Management:‬ ‭Campus‬ ‭Management's‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭system‬
‭supports‬‭the‬‭entire‬‭student‬‭lifecycle,‬‭from‬‭admissions‬‭to‬‭alumni‬‭relations,‬
‭ensuring a holistic approach to student management.‬
‭●‬ ‭Academic‬ ‭Program‬ ‭Management:‬ ‭The‬ ‭system‬ ‭aids‬ ‭in‬ ‭the‬ ‭effective‬
‭management‬ ‭of‬ ‭academic‬ ‭programs,‬ ‭course‬ ‭offerings,‬ ‭and‬ ‭curriculum‬
‭development.‬
‭●‬ ‭Analytics‬ ‭and‬ ‭Reporting:‬ ‭Robust‬ ‭analytics‬ ‭and‬ ‭reporting‬ ‭features‬
‭enable‬ ‭institutions‬ ‭to‬ ‭gain‬ ‭insights‬ ‭into‬ ‭various‬ ‭aspects‬ ‭of‬ ‭their‬
‭operations for continuous improvement.‬
‭These‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭systems‬ ‭play‬ ‭a‬ ‭crucial‬ ‭role‬ ‭in‬ ‭enhancing‬ ‭the‬ ‭efficiency,‬ ‭organization,‬ ‭and‬
‭overall‬ ‭management‬ ‭of‬ ‭educational‬ ‭institutions‬ ‭in‬ ‭India.‬‭Institutions‬‭may‬‭choose‬‭these‬
‭systems‬ ‭based‬ ‭on‬ ‭their‬ ‭specific‬ ‭requirements,‬ ‭and‬ ‭the‬ ‭features‬‭offered‬‭by‬‭each‬‭system‬
‭contribute to the seamless functioning of academic and administrative processes.‬

‭2.2‬‭Related Work‬
‭Enterprise‬ ‭Resource‬ ‭Planning‬ ‭(ERP)‬ ‭systems‬ ‭have‬ ‭emerged‬ ‭as‬ ‭integral‬ ‭tools‬ ‭in‬
‭contemporary‬ ‭organizational‬ ‭management,‬ ‭providing‬ ‭a‬ ‭comprehensive‬ ‭solution‬ ‭for‬
‭integrating diverse business processes.‬

‭Some Best College ERP Software in India ‬

‭1.‬ ‭Birlamedisoft Medical College Campus Management Software‬


‭One‬ ‭of‬ ‭the‬‭top-rated‬‭medical‬‭college‬‭management‬‭software‬‭that‬‭helps‬‭manage‬‭medical‬
‭colleges‬ ‭and‬ ‭the‬ ‭hospitals‬ ‭attached‬ ‭to‬ ‭them. ‭B
‬ irlamedisoft‬ ‭Medical‬ ‭College‬ ‭Campus‬
‭Management‬‭Software‬‭ERP‬‭for‬‭college‬‭management‬‭provides‬‭a‬‭campus‬‭wide‬‭integrated‬
‭system‬ ‭that‬ ‭automates‬ ‭and‬ ‭assimilates‬ ‭the‬ ‭diverse‬ ‭resources,‬ ‭operations,‬ ‭and‬
‭management of an educational institution.‬
‭It comes embedded with several rich modules, such as:‬
‭●‬ ‭Admission management‬
‭●‬ ‭Student fee instalments‬
‭●‬ ‭Attendance tracking‬
‭●‬ ‭Leave management‬
‭●‬ ‭Examination management‬
‭Birlamedisoft Medical College Campus Management Software Specifications‬
‭●‬ ‭Free Trial:‬‭Available‬
‭34‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭●‬ ‭Free Version:‬‭Available‬
‭●‬ ‭Operating System:‬‭Windows‬

‭Pros and Cons of Birlamedisoft‬


‭●‬ ‭You can also manage the schedule of your college staff with this software.‬
‭●‬ ‭It also helps manage the score of your students.‬
‭●‬ ‭It takes a lot of time to transport students’ data.‬

‭2.‬ ‭Swastin Cloud ERP – School & College‬


‭By‬ ‭using ‭S
‬ wastin‬ ‭Cloud‬ ‭ERP‬‭,‬ ‭you‬ ‭can‬ ‭manage‬ ‭several‬ ‭different‬ ‭functions‬ ‭of‬ ‭an‬
‭educational‬ ‭institution.‬ ‭Functions‬ ‭such‬ ‭as‬ ‭the‬ ‭various‬ ‭admission‬ ‭procedures,‬
‭transportation‬ ‭system,‬ ‭conduct‬ ‭annual‬ ‭examinations,‬ ‭students’‬ ‭progress‬ ‭report‬ ‭cards,‬
‭create‬ ‭student‬ ‭ID‬ ‭cards.‬ ‭Also,‬ ‭educational‬ ‭institutions‬ ‭can‬ ‭maintain‬ ‭a‬ ‭record‬ ‭of‬ ‭daily‬
‭attendance of students.‬
‭Modules of Swastin‬
‭●‬ ‭Student academic records‬
‭●‬ ‭Fees Collection & instalment payment reminders‬
‭●‬ ‭Route wise transport management‬
‭●‬ ‭Birthday SMS to students and parents‬
‭●‬ ‭Fees dues tracking‬
‭●‬ ‭Defaulters list creation‬
‭Specifications of Swastin Cloud ERP‬
‭●‬ ‭Free Trial:‬‭Not available‬
‭●‬ ‭Free Version:‬‭Not Available‬
‭●‬ ‭Operating System:‬‭Windows, Android, and iOS‬
‭Pros and Cons of Swastin‬
‭●‬ ‭It can be used for managing all the finances of your college‬
‭●‬ ‭You can also keep track of student attendance with this ERP.‬
‭●‬ ‭Limited options available to customize the software.‬
‭3.‬ ‭Rushda College Management Software‬
‭Boasting‬‭a‬‭highly‬‭integrated‬‭module‬‭structure, ‭R
‬ ushda‬‭College‬‭Management‬‭Software‬‭is‬
‭a‬ ‭unique‬ ‭college‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭software.‬ ‭This‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭college‬ ‭management‬ ‭system‬ ‭offers‬ ‭a‬ ‭user‬
‭defined‬ ‭password‬ ‭scheme‬ ‭enabling‬ ‭each‬ ‭college‬ ‭institution‬ ‭to‬ ‭customize‬ ‭its‬ ‭security‬

‭35‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭features.‬‭Furthermore,‬‭you‬‭can‬‭generate‬‭reports‬‭at‬‭your‬‭convenience‬‭with‬‭its‬‭easy‬‭to‬‭use‬
‭and intuitive interface.‬
‭Features of Rushda College Management Software‬
‭●‬ ‭Registration management‬
‭●‬ ‭Admission process‬
‭●‬ ‭Fee & other dues‬
‭●‬ ‭Payroll processing‬
‭●‬ ‭Library management‬
‭●‬ ‭Accounting & bookkeeping‬
‭●‬ ‭Store Keeping‬
‭●‬ ‭Transport management‬
‭●‬ ‭Hostel administration‬
‭●‬ ‭Scholarship detail‬
‭Specifications of Rushda College Management Software‬
‭●‬ ‭Free Trial:‬‭Not available‬
‭●‬ ‭Free Version:‬‭Not Available‬
‭●‬ ‭Operating System:‬‭Cloud based and it supports all‬‭major operating systems‬
‭Pros and Cons of Rushda‬
‭●‬ ‭The software is very easy to use and navigate.‬
‭●‬ ‭The payroll processing of this college ERP is very quick.‬
‭●‬ ‭Its data loading speed is very low.‬

‭2.3.‬ ‭Identification and Classification Faults‬


‭Identification and Classification of Faults in Previous and Existing ERP Systems:‬

‭1.‬ ‭User Interface Issues:‬

‭●‬ I‭ dentification:‬ ‭User‬ ‭complaints‬ ‭about‬ ‭non-intuitive‬ ‭interfaces‬ ‭and‬ ‭navigation‬


‭challenges.‬

‭●‬ ‭Classification: Usability and Interface Design Faults.‬

‭2.‬ ‭Data Migration Problems:‬

‭●‬ I‭ dentification:‬ ‭Reports‬ ‭of‬ ‭data‬ ‭inconsistencies‬ ‭and‬ ‭system‬ ‭crashes‬ ‭during‬
‭migration.‬

‭●‬ ‭Classification: Data Integrity and Performance Faults.‬


‭36‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭3.‬ ‭Integration Failures:‬

‭●‬ I‭ dentification:‬‭Unsuccessful‬‭integration‬‭with‬‭third-party‬‭applications‬‭and‬‭delays‬
‭in information exchange.‬

‭●‬ ‭Classification: Integration and Communication Faults.‬

‭4.‬ ‭Customization Challenges:‬

‭●‬ I‭ dentification:‬ ‭Requests‬ ‭for‬ ‭functionalities‬ ‭beyond‬ ‭system‬ ‭capabilities‬ ‭and‬


‭difficulty in modifying workflows.‬

‭●‬ ‭Classification: Customization and Flexibility Faults.‬

‭5.‬ ‭Security Vulnerabilities:‬

‭●‬ ‭Identification: Reports of data breaches and failed security audits.‬

‭●‬ ‭Classification: Security and Access Control Faults.‬

‭6.‬ ‭Performance Bottlenecks:‬

‭●‬ I‭ dentification:‬ ‭Complaints‬ ‭about‬ ‭slow‬ ‭response‬ ‭times‬ ‭and‬ ‭frequent‬ ‭system‬
‭downtimes.‬

‭●‬ ‭Classification: Performance and Scalability Faults.‬

‭7.‬ ‭Incomplete Documentation:‬

‭●‬ I‭ dentification:‬ ‭Lack‬ ‭of‬ ‭comprehensive‬ ‭documentation‬ ‭and‬ ‭difficulty‬ ‭in‬ ‭finding‬
‭relevant information.‬

‭●‬ ‭Classification: Documentation and Communication Faults.‬

‭8.‬ ‭Resistance to Change:‬

‭●‬ I‭ dentification:‬ ‭Increased‬ ‭support‬ ‭requests‬ ‭and‬ ‭decline‬ ‭in‬ ‭productivity‬ ‭after‬
‭system updates.‬

‭●‬ ‭Classification: Change Management and User Adoption Faults.‬

‭9.‬ ‭Vendor Dependence:‬

‭●‬ I‭ dentification:‬ ‭Challenges‬ ‭in‬ ‭implementing‬ ‭updates‬ ‭and‬‭concerns‬‭about‬‭limited‬


‭support options.‬

‭●‬ ‭Classification: Vendor Lock-In and Flexibility Faults.‬

‭37‬‭|‬‭Page‬
I‭ dentifying‬ ‭and‬ ‭classifying‬ ‭faults‬ ‭in‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭systems‬ ‭is‬ ‭an‬‭ongoing‬‭process‬‭that‬‭involves‬‭a‬
‭combination‬ ‭of‬‭user‬‭feedback,‬‭system‬‭monitoring,‬‭and‬‭proactive‬‭analysis.‬‭The‬‭goal‬‭is‬‭to‬
‭address‬‭these‬‭faults‬‭systematically,‬‭ensuring‬‭the‬‭continued‬‭effectiveness‬‭and‬‭efficiency‬‭of‬
‭the ERP system within an organization.‬

‭CHAPTER THREE‬

‭3.‬ ‭BUSINESS AREA ANALYSES AND REQUIREMENT‬


‭ANALYSIS‬
‭3.1.‬ ‭Introduction‬
‭"Business‬ ‭Area‬ ‭Analyses‬ ‭and‬ ‭Requirement‬ ‭Analysis"‬ ‭is‬ ‭a‬ ‭critical‬ ‭phase‬ ‭in‬ ‭the‬
‭development‬ ‭of‬ ‭information‬ ‭systems‬ ‭and‬ ‭software‬ ‭projects.‬ ‭This‬ ‭phase‬ ‭involves‬
‭understanding‬ ‭the‬ ‭business‬ ‭context,‬ ‭identifying‬ ‭stakeholder‬ ‭needs,‬ ‭and‬ ‭defining‬ ‭the‬
‭requirements‬ ‭that‬ ‭the‬ ‭system‬ ‭must‬ ‭fulfil.‬ ‭Here‬ ‭is‬ ‭a‬ ‭breakdown‬ ‭of‬‭the‬‭key‬‭activities‬‭and‬
‭considerations in this phase:‬
‭1.‬ ‭Business Area Analyses:‬
‭●‬ ‭Understand the business environment.‬
‭●‬ ‭Identify goals, objectives, and stakeholders.‬
‭2.‬ ‭Requirement Analysis:‬
‭●‬ ‭Elicit requirements through interviews, surveys, and workshops.‬
‭●‬ ‭Document functional and non-functional requirements.‬
‭●‬ ‭Analyse, prioritize, and validate requirements.‬
‭●‬ ‭Establish traceability and manage changes.‬
‭●‬ ‭Use prototypes for validation.‬
‭3.‬ ‭Documentation:‬
‭●‬ ‭Document findings, requirements, and analyses using standardized templates.‬
‭4.‬ ‭Review and Approval:‬
‭●‬ ‭Review requirements with stakeholders.‬
‭●‬ ‭Obtain formal approval.‬
‭5.‬ ‭Communication:‬
‭●‬ ‭Maintain clear communication channels.‬
‭●‬ ‭Establish a communication plan.‬

‭38‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭This‬‭phase‬‭ensures‬‭a‬‭solid‬‭foundation‬‭for‬‭system‬‭development‬‭by‬‭clearly‬‭defining‬‭project‬
‭goals and requirements.‬

‭39‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭3.2.‬ ‭Description of the Existing System‬‭-‬‭Focus Softnet‬
‭Focus‬‭Softnet‬‭is‬‭an‬‭established‬‭ERP‬‭solution‬‭designed‬‭to‬‭streamline‬‭and‬‭integrate‬‭various‬
‭business‬ ‭processes‬ ‭within‬ ‭an‬ ‭organization.‬ ‭It‬ ‭caters‬ ‭to‬ ‭diverse‬ ‭industry‬ ‭verticals,‬
‭providing a comprehensive suite of modules to support key functions.‬
‭Core Modules:‬
‭1.‬ ‭Finance:‬
‭●‬ ‭Manages financial transactions, accounting, and reporting.‬
‭●‬ ‭Includes features for budgeting, financial analysis, and compliance.‬
‭2.‬ ‭Human Resources:‬
‭●‬ ‭Covers employee management, payroll, attendance, and performance evaluation.‬
‭●‬ ‭Facilitates HR processes from recruitment to retirement.‬
‭3.‬ ‭Supply Chain Management:‬
‭●‬ ‭Handles procurement, inventory management, and order fulfilment.‬
‭●‬ ‭Optimizes the supply chain for efficiency and cost-effectiveness.‬
‭4.‬ ‭Sales and Customer Relationship Management (CRM):‬
‭●‬ ‭Manages the sales pipeline, customer interactions, and order processing.‬
‭●‬ ‭Enhances customer engagement and satisfaction.‬
‭5.‬ ‭Manufacturing:‬
‭●‬ ‭Supports production planning, scheduling, and quality control.‬
‭●‬ ‭Integrates with other modules for seamless coordination.‬
‭6.‬ ‭Business Intelligence and Analytics:‬
‭●‬ ‭Provides tools for data analysis, reporting, and decision-making.‬
‭●‬ ‭Enables users to gain insights into business performance.‬

‭Key Features:‬
‭●‬ ‭User-Friendly Interface:‬
‭●‬ ‭Offers an intuitive and easy-to-navigate user interface.‬
‭●‬ ‭Enhances user adoption and productivity.‬
‭●‬ ‭Customization and Scalability:‬
‭●‬ ‭Allows customization to adapt to specific business requirements.‬
‭●‬ ‭Scales to accommodate the growth and evolving needs of the organization.‬
‭●‬ ‭Integration Capabilities:‬
‭●‬ ‭Integrates with third-party applications and external systems.‬
‭●‬ ‭Ensures data consistency and real-time information flow.‬
‭40‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭●‬ ‭Security and Compliance:‬
‭●‬ ‭Implements robust security measures to protect sensitive data.‬
‭●‬ ‭Complies with industry regulations and standards.‬
‭Technology Stack:‬
‭●‬ ‭Utilizes‬ ‭modern‬ ‭technologies‬ ‭such‬ ‭as‬ ‭cloud‬ ‭computing,‬ ‭mobile‬ ‭applications,‬ ‭and‬
‭web-based interfaces.‬
‭●‬ ‭Supports integration with other enterprise technologies.‬
‭Client Base:‬
‭●‬ ‭Focus‬ ‭Softnet‬ ‭caters‬ ‭to‬ ‭a‬ ‭diverse‬ ‭client‬ ‭base‬ ‭across‬ ‭industries‬ ‭such‬ ‭as‬ ‭manufacturing,‬
‭retail, healthcare, and services.‬
‭Ongoing Updates and Support:‬
‭●‬ ‭Focus‬ ‭Softnet‬ ‭regularly‬ ‭releases‬ ‭updates‬ ‭to‬ ‭enhance‬‭functionality‬‭and‬‭address‬‭security‬
‭concerns.‬
‭●‬ ‭Provides comprehensive customer support and training programs.‬

‭3.3.‬ ‭Activities Provided by the Existing System‬


‭The types of activities that ERP providers like Focus Softnet typically offer:‬
‭1.‬ ‭Implementation Services:‬
‭●‬ ‭Assistance in the installation and setup of the ERP system.‬
‭●‬ ‭Configuration to align with the specific needs of the organization.‬
‭2.‬ ‭Training and Support:‬
‭●‬ ‭Training‬ ‭programs‬ ‭for‬ ‭end-users‬ ‭to‬ ‭ensure‬ ‭effective‬ ‭utilization‬ ‭of‬ ‭the‬‭ERP‬
‭system.‬
‭●‬ ‭Ongoing customer support for issue resolution and system maintenance.‬
‭3.‬ ‭Customization:‬
‭●‬ ‭Tailoring the ERP system to meet the unique requirements of the business.‬
‭●‬ ‭Development of custom modules or features if needed.‬
‭4.‬ ‭Upgrades and Updates:‬
‭●‬ ‭Providing regular updates and upgrades to improve system functionality.‬
‭●‬ ‭Ensuring‬ ‭that‬ ‭the‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭system‬ ‭is‬ ‭up-to-date‬ ‭with‬ ‭the‬ ‭latest‬ ‭features‬ ‭and‬
‭security patches.‬

‭41‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭5.‬ ‭Consultation:‬
‭●‬ ‭Consultation‬ ‭services‬ ‭to‬ ‭help‬ ‭businesses‬ ‭identify‬ ‭the‬ ‭most‬ ‭suitable‬ ‭ERP‬
‭modules.‬
‭●‬ ‭Providing insights into best practices for ERP implementation.‬
‭6.‬ ‭Integration Services:‬
‭●‬ ‭Integration‬ ‭of‬ ‭the‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭system‬ ‭with‬ ‭other‬ ‭enterprise‬ ‭applications‬ ‭or‬
‭third-party systems.‬
‭●‬ ‭Ensuring smooth data flow and consistency across the organization.‬
‭7.‬ ‭Data Migration:‬
‭●‬ ‭Assisting‬ ‭in‬ ‭the‬ ‭migration‬ ‭of‬ ‭data‬ ‭from‬ ‭legacy‬ ‭systems‬ ‭to‬ ‭the‬ ‭new‬ ‭ERP‬
‭system.‬
‭●‬ ‭Ensuring data integrity and accuracy during the transition.‬
‭8.‬ ‭Business Intelligence and Analytics:‬
‭●‬ ‭Offering tools and features for data analysis and reporting.‬
‭●‬ ‭Helping businesses derive meaningful insights from their data.‬
‭9.‬ ‭Security Measures:‬
‭●‬ ‭Implementing security features to safeguard sensitive business data.‬
‭●‬ ‭Providing‬ ‭guidelines‬ ‭for‬ ‭ensuring‬ ‭compliance‬ ‭with‬ ‭data‬ ‭protection‬
‭regulations.‬
‭10.‬‭Cloud Services:‬
‭●‬ ‭Offering‬ ‭cloud-based‬ ‭solutions‬ ‭for‬ ‭organizations‬ ‭seeking‬ ‭flexibility‬ ‭and‬
‭scalability.‬
‭●‬ ‭Facilitating remote access and collaboration.‬

‭3.4.‬ ‭Major Functions of the Existing System‬


‭The Major Functions that ERP providers like Focus Softnet typically offer:‬
‭1.‬ ‭Financial Management:‬
‭●‬ ‭General Ledger‬
‭●‬ ‭Accounts Payable and Receivable‬
‭●‬ ‭Financial Reporting‬
‭2.‬ ‭Human Resources Management:‬
‭●‬ ‭Employee Information Management‬
‭●‬ ‭Payroll Processing‬

‭42‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭3.‬ ‭Supply Chain Management:‬
‭●‬ ‭Inventory Management‬
‭●‬ ‭Procurement‬
‭4.‬ ‭Sales and Customer Relationship Management (CRM):‬
‭●‬ ‭Sales Order Management‬
‭●‬ ‭Customer Database Management‬
‭5.‬ ‭Manufacturing Management:‬
‭●‬ ‭Production Planning‬
‭●‬ ‭Work Order Management‬
‭6.‬ ‭Business Intelligence and Analytics:‬
‭●‬ ‭Data Analysis and Reporting‬
‭●‬ ‭Dashboards and KPI Monitoring‬
‭7.‬ ‭Integration Capabilities:‬
‭●‬ ‭Integration with Third-Party Applications‬
‭●‬ ‭APIs for Data Exchange‬
‭8.‬ ‭Security and Compliance:‬
‭●‬ ‭User Access Controls‬
‭●‬ ‭Compliance with Industry Regulations‬
‭9.‬ ‭Customization and Flexibility:‬
‭●‬ ‭Tailoring the ERP system to meet specific business requirements.‬

‭3.5.‬ ‭Strength and Weakness of the Existing System‬


‭The strengths and weaknesses of an ERP software like Focus Softnet are:‬

‭Strengths:‬

‭1.‬ ‭Comprehensive ERP Functionality:‬

‭●‬ ‭Focus‬ ‭Softnet‬ ‭typically‬ ‭offers‬ ‭a‬ ‭wide‬ ‭range‬ ‭of‬‭ERP‬‭modules‬‭covering‬‭finance,‬


‭human resources, supply chain, and more.‬

‭2.‬ ‭Customization Capabilities:‬

‭●‬ ‭The‬ ‭ability‬ ‭to‬ ‭tailor‬ ‭the‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭system‬ ‭to‬ ‭meet‬ ‭the‬ ‭specific‬ ‭needs‬ ‭of‬ ‭different‬
‭industries and businesses.‬

‭43‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭3.‬ ‭Integration Capabilities:‬

‭●‬ ‭Integration‬ ‭with‬ ‭third-party‬ ‭applications‬ ‭and‬ ‭systems,‬ ‭facilitating‬ ‭a‬ ‭seamless‬
‭flow of data.‬

‭4.‬ ‭User-Friendly Interface:‬

‭●‬ ‭Providing an intuitive and easy-to-use interface for end-users.‬

‭5.‬ ‭Business Intelligence and Analytics:‬

‭●‬ ‭Robust‬ ‭tools‬ ‭for‬ ‭data‬ ‭analysis‬ ‭and‬ ‭reporting,‬ ‭enabling‬ ‭informed‬
‭decision-making.‬

‭6.‬ ‭Ongoing Support and Updates:‬

‭●‬ ‭Regular‬ ‭updates‬ ‭and‬ ‭ongoing‬ ‭customer‬ ‭support‬ ‭to‬ ‭address‬ ‭issues‬ ‭and‬ ‭provide‬
‭improvements.‬

‭7.‬ ‭Security Measures:‬

‭●‬ ‭Implementing robust security features to protect sensitive business data.‬

‭Weaknesses:‬

‭1.‬ ‭Cost Considerations:‬

‭●‬ ‭ERP‬‭solutions,‬‭including‬‭Focus‬‭Softnet,‬‭may‬‭involve‬‭significant‬‭initial‬‭costs‬‭and‬
‭ongoing expenses.‬

‭2.‬ ‭Learning Curve:‬

‭●‬ ‭The‬‭complexity‬‭of‬‭ERP‬‭systems‬‭can‬‭lead‬‭to‬‭a‬‭learning‬‭curve‬‭for‬‭users,‬‭especially‬
‭during the implementation phase.‬

‭3.‬ ‭Dependency on Internet Connectivity:‬

‭●‬ ‭Cloud-based‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭solutions‬ ‭may‬ ‭be‬ ‭dependent‬ ‭on‬ ‭stable‬ ‭internet‬ ‭connectivity,‬
‭which can be a limitation in certain environments.‬

‭4.‬ ‭Customization Complexity:‬

‭●‬ ‭Extensive‬ ‭customization‬ ‭may‬ ‭require‬ ‭specialized‬ ‭skills‬ ‭and‬ ‭can‬ ‭complicate‬
‭future updates.‬

‭44‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭5.‬ ‭Competitive Landscape:‬

‭●‬ ‭The‬‭ERP‬‭market‬‭is‬‭competitive,‬‭and‬‭weaknesses‬‭may‬‭be‬‭relative‬‭to‬‭the‬‭offerings‬
‭of other ERP providers.‬

‭6.‬ ‭Implementation Challenges:‬

‭●‬ ‭ERP‬‭implementations‬‭can‬‭face‬‭challenges‬‭related‬‭to‬‭data‬‭migration,‬‭training,‬‭and‬
‭organizational change management.‬

‭3.6.‬ ‭Player of the Existing System‬


‭Here are the key players typically associated with the Focus Softnet ERP system:‬

‭1.‬ ‭Management:‬
‭●‬ ‭Top-level‬ ‭executives‬ ‭and‬ ‭decision-makers‬ ‭who‬ ‭oversee‬ ‭the‬ ‭implementation‬ ‭of‬
‭the ERP system.‬
‭●‬ ‭Responsible‬ ‭for‬ ‭setting‬ ‭organizational‬ ‭goals‬ ‭and‬ ‭aligning‬ ‭them‬ ‭with‬ ‭the‬ ‭ERP‬
‭strategy.‬
‭2.‬ ‭End Users:‬
‭●‬ ‭Employees‬‭at‬‭various‬‭levels‬‭who‬‭directly‬‭interact‬‭with‬‭the‬‭ERP‬‭system‬‭for‬‭their‬
‭daily tasks.‬
‭●‬ ‭Include‬‭staff‬‭from‬‭different‬‭departments‬‭such‬‭as‬‭finance,‬‭human‬‭resources,‬‭sales,‬
‭and operations.‬
‭3.‬ ‭IT Department:‬
‭●‬ ‭IT‬‭professionals‬‭responsible‬‭for‬‭the‬‭installation,‬‭configuration,‬‭and‬‭maintenance‬
‭of the Focus Softnet ERP system.‬
‭●‬ ‭Involved‬ ‭in‬ ‭system‬ ‭updates,‬ ‭troubleshooting,‬ ‭and‬ ‭ensuring‬ ‭overall‬ ‭system‬
‭performance.‬
‭4.‬ ‭Implementation Team:‬
‭●‬ ‭Consultants‬ ‭and‬ ‭experts‬ ‭from‬ ‭Focus‬ ‭Softnet‬ ‭or‬ ‭third-party‬ ‭implementation‬
‭partners.‬
‭●‬ ‭Tasked‬ ‭with‬ ‭customizing‬ ‭the‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭system‬ ‭to‬ ‭meet‬ ‭the‬ ‭specific‬ ‭needs‬ ‭of‬ ‭the‬
‭organization and ensuring a smooth deployment.‬
‭5.‬ ‭Regulatory Bodies:‬
‭●‬ ‭Entities overseeing industry regulations and compliance standards.‬

‭45‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭●‬ ‭Relevant‬ ‭for‬ ‭organizations‬ ‭using‬ ‭the‬ ‭Focus‬ ‭Softnet‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭system‬ ‭in‬ ‭industries‬
‭with specific regulatory requirements.‬

‭3.7.‬ ‭Business Rule Identification‬


‭Business‬ ‭rule‬ ‭identification‬ ‭is‬ ‭a‬ ‭crucial‬ ‭step‬ ‭in‬ ‭the‬ ‭process‬ ‭of‬ ‭understanding‬ ‭and‬
‭formalizing‬ ‭the‬ ‭rules‬ ‭that‬ ‭govern‬ ‭an‬ ‭organization's‬ ‭processes,‬ ‭data,‬‭and‬‭decision-making.‬
‭Business‬‭rules‬‭are‬‭specific‬‭statements‬‭that‬‭define‬‭or‬‭constrain‬‭some‬‭aspect‬‭of‬‭the‬‭business.‬
‭They‬‭play‬‭a‬‭key‬‭role‬‭in‬‭guiding‬‭and‬‭regulating‬‭business‬‭operations.‬‭Here‬‭is‬‭a‬‭guide‬‭on‬‭how‬
‭to identify business rules:‬

‭1. Understand Business Processes:‬

‭●‬ ‭Analyse and document existing business processes.‬


‭●‬ ‭Identify decision points within these processes where rules influence outcomes.‬
‭2. Engage Stakeholders:‬

‭●‬ ‭Collaborate with subject matter experts, business analysts, and end-users.‬
‭●‬ ‭Collect insights on how decisions are made and what criteria are considered.‬
‭3. Review Documentation:‬

‭●‬ ‭Examine existing documentation, such as policies, procedures, and manuals.‬


‭●‬ ‭Look for explicit rules or implicit rules embedded in the language.‬
‭4. Data Analysis:‬

‭●‬ ‭Explore the data used in business processes.‬


‭●‬ ‭Identify rules governing data validation, transformation, and usage.‬
‭5. Regulatory Compliance:‬

‭●‬ ‭Consider industry regulations and legal requirements.‬


‭●‬ ‭Identify rules mandated by external authorities that the organization must adhere to.‬
‭6. Identify Constraints:‬

‭●‬ ‭Recognize constraints that apply to specific processes or data.‬


‭●‬ ‭Constraints may include limitations on values, ranges, or conditions.‬
‭7. Use Cases and Scenarios:‬

‭●‬ ‭analyse various use cases and scenarios.‬


‭●‬ ‭Identify rules that apply under different circumstances.‬
‭8. Business Rule Management Systems (BRMS):‬
‭46‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭●‬ ‭Leverage BRMS tools if available.‬
‭●‬ ‭These systems help document, manage, and automate business rules.‬
‭9. Collaborative Workshops:‬

‭●‬ ‭Conduct workshops with stakeholders to elicit rules.‬


‭●‬ ‭Facilitate discussions to uncover implicit knowledge.‬
‭10. Prototype Validation:‬

‭●‬ ‭Develop prototypes or proof of concepts.‬


‭●‬ ‭Validate rules through iterative testing and feedback.‬
‭11. Continuous Review:‬

‭●‬ ‭Recognize that business rules may evolve.‬


‭●‬ ‭Conduct regular reviews and updates as needed.‬

‭3.8.‬ ‭Evidence in the Existing System‬


‭The‬‭term‬‭"evidence"‬‭in‬‭the‬‭context‬‭of‬‭an‬‭ERP‬‭system‬‭like‬‭Focus‬‭Softnet‬‭typically‬‭refers‬‭to‬
‭information,‬ ‭documentation,‬ ‭or‬ ‭records‬ ‭that‬ ‭validate‬ ‭and‬ ‭support‬ ‭various‬ ‭aspects‬ ‭of‬ ‭the‬
‭system.‬ ‭Here‬ ‭are‬ ‭different‬ ‭types‬ ‭of‬ ‭evidence‬ ‭that‬ ‭might‬ ‭be‬ ‭associated‬ ‭with‬ ‭the‬ ‭Focus‬
‭Softnet ERP system:‬

‭1.‬ ‭Implementation Documentation:‬


‭●‬ ‭Project‬ ‭Plan:‬ ‭Detailed‬ ‭documentation‬ ‭outlining‬ ‭the‬‭plan‬‭for‬‭implementing‬‭the‬
‭Focus‬ ‭Softnet‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭system,‬ ‭including‬ ‭milestones,‬ ‭timelines,‬ ‭and‬ ‭resource‬
‭allocation.‬
‭●‬ ‭Customization‬ ‭Records:‬ ‭Documentation‬ ‭of‬ ‭any‬ ‭customizations‬ ‭or‬
‭modifications‬ ‭made‬ ‭to‬‭the‬‭standard‬‭Focus‬‭Softnet‬‭ERP‬‭system‬‭to‬‭meet‬‭specific‬
‭organizational requirements.‬
‭2.‬ ‭Training Materials:‬
‭●‬ ‭User‬ ‭Manuals:‬‭Comprehensive‬‭guides‬‭or‬‭manuals‬‭that‬‭provide‬‭instructions‬‭for‬
‭end-users on how to use different features of the Focus Softnet ERP system.‬
‭●‬ ‭Training‬ ‭Videos:‬ ‭Recorded‬ ‭training‬ ‭sessions‬ ‭or‬ ‭instructional‬ ‭videos‬
‭demonstrating key functionalities and processes within the ERP system.‬
‭3.‬ ‭System Configuration Records:‬
‭●‬ ‭Documentation‬ ‭outlining‬ ‭the‬ ‭configuration‬ ‭settings‬ ‭and‬ ‭parameters‬ ‭chosen‬
‭during the setup of the Focus Softnet ERP system.‬
‭47‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭●‬ ‭Configuration‬ ‭records‬ ‭for‬ ‭modules‬ ‭such‬ ‭as‬ ‭finance,‬ ‭human‬ ‭resources,‬ ‭and‬
‭inventory.‬
‭4.‬ ‭Support and Maintenance Records:‬
‭●‬ ‭Troubleshooting‬ ‭Logs‬‭:‬ ‭Records‬ ‭of‬ ‭issues,‬ ‭errors,‬ ‭and‬ ‭their‬ ‭resolutions‬ ‭during‬
‭the operation of the Focus Softnet ERP system.‬
‭●‬ ‭Patch‬‭and‬‭Update‬‭Logs:‬‭Documentation‬‭of‬‭patches,‬‭updates,‬‭and‬‭new‬‭releases‬
‭applied to the ERP system for maintenance and improvement.‬
‭5.‬ ‭User Feedback and Surveys:‬
‭●‬ ‭Records‬‭of‬‭user‬‭feedback,‬‭comments,‬‭and‬‭suggestions‬‭collected‬‭through‬‭surveys‬
‭or feedback forms.‬
‭●‬ ‭Reports‬ ‭summarizing‬ ‭user‬ ‭satisfaction‬ ‭levels‬ ‭and‬ ‭areas‬‭for‬‭improvement‬‭in‬‭the‬
‭Focus Softnet ERP system.‬
‭6.‬ ‭Performance Reports:‬
‭●‬ ‭System‬ ‭Performance‬ ‭Metrics:‬ ‭Metrics‬ ‭and‬ ‭reports‬ ‭on‬ ‭the‬ ‭performance‬ ‭of‬ ‭the‬
‭Focus‬ ‭Softnet‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭system,‬ ‭including‬ ‭response‬ ‭times,‬ ‭system‬ ‭availability,‬ ‭and‬
‭resource utilization.‬
‭7.‬ ‭Compliance and Audit Documents:‬
‭●‬ ‭Compliance‬ ‭Reports:‬ ‭Documentation‬ ‭demonstrating‬ ‭how‬ ‭the‬ ‭Focus‬ ‭Softnet‬
‭ERP system aligns with industry standards and regulatory requirements.‬
‭●‬ ‭Audit‬ ‭Trail‬ ‭Records‬‭:‬ ‭Records‬ ‭of‬ ‭system‬ ‭activities‬ ‭and‬ ‭changes‬ ‭for‬ ‭audit‬
‭purposes, ensuring data integrity and accountability.‬

‭3.9.‬ ‭Problems in the Existing System‬

‭Common problems reported with Focus Softnet ERP systems:‬

‭1.‬ ‭Customization Challenges:‬


‭●‬ ‭Adapting the ERP system to specific organizational needs can be complex.‬
‭●‬ ‭Customizations may lead to compatibility issues during system upgrades.‬
‭2.‬ ‭User Resistance:‬
‭●‬ ‭Employees may resist adopting the new ERP system, leading to underutilization.‬
‭●‬ ‭Inadequate training or communication can contribute to user resistance.‬
‭3.‬ ‭Integration Issues:‬
‭●‬ ‭Challenges in integrating the ERP system with existing legacy systems.‬

‭48‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭●‬ ‭Data‬ ‭inconsistencies‬ ‭may‬ ‭arise‬ ‭when‬ ‭integrating‬ ‭with‬ ‭other‬ ‭enterprise‬
‭applications.‬
‭4.‬ ‭Data Quality and Accuracy:‬
‭●‬ ‭Inaccurate or incomplete data entry can compromise the integrity of reports.‬
‭●‬ ‭Maintaining data quality requires ongoing vigilance and cleaning processes.‬
‭5.‬ ‭Cost Overruns:‬
‭●‬ ‭Implementation costs may exceed initial estimates.‬
‭●‬ ‭Unforeseen‬ ‭expenses‬ ‭related‬ ‭to‬ ‭customization,‬ ‭training,‬ ‭or‬ ‭support‬ ‭can‬
‭contribute to budget overruns.‬
‭6.‬ ‭Performance Bottlenecks:‬
‭●‬ ‭Slow system response times, particularly during peak usage periods.‬
‭●‬ ‭Inefficient‬ ‭database‬ ‭queries‬ ‭or‬ ‭inadequate‬ ‭server‬ ‭resources‬ ‭can‬ ‭contribute‬ ‭to‬
‭performance issues.‬

‭3.10.‬ ‭Practice to be Preserved‬

‭The‬‭phrase‬‭"practice‬‭to‬‭be‬‭preserved"‬‭suggests‬‭the‬‭idea‬‭of‬‭maintaining‬‭or‬‭safeguarding‬‭a‬
‭particular‬‭practice‬‭or‬‭tradition.‬‭Preserving‬‭best‬‭practices‬‭in‬‭an‬‭ERP‬‭(Enterprise‬‭Resource‬
‭Planning)‬ ‭system‬ ‭is‬ ‭crucial‬ ‭for‬ ‭ensuring‬ ‭its‬ ‭effective‬ ‭and‬ ‭efficient‬ ‭operation.‬ ‭Here‬ ‭are‬
‭some‬‭key‬‭practices‬‭to‬‭consider‬‭for‬‭preserving‬‭and‬‭enhancing‬‭the‬‭performance‬‭of‬‭an‬‭ERP‬
‭system:‬

‭1.‬ ‭Regular Backups:‬

‭●‬ ‭Implement regular and automated backups of the ERP system and its data.‬

‭●‬ ‭Store backups securely for quick recovery in case of data loss or system failures.‬

‭2.‬ ‭Version Control:‬

‭●‬ ‭Maintain a version control system for customizations and configurations.‬

‭●‬ ‭Document changes made to the system for troubleshooting and updates.‬

‭3.‬ ‭User Training and Documentation:‬

‭●‬ ‭Provide comprehensive training to users on the proper use of the ERP system.‬

‭●‬ ‭Develop and maintain user documentation as a reference for common tasks.‬

‭49‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭4.‬ ‭Security Protocols:‬

‭●‬ ‭Implement robust security measures to protect sensitive data.‬

‭●‬ ‭Regularly‬ ‭update‬ ‭security‬ ‭protocols‬ ‭and‬ ‭conduct‬ ‭audits‬ ‭to‬ ‭address‬
‭vulnerabilities.‬

‭5.‬ ‭Customization Best Practices:‬

‭●‬ ‭Adhere to best practices when customizing or extending the ERP system.‬

‭●‬ ‭Document customizations thoroughly for future maintainability.‬

‭6.‬ ‭Regular System Audits:‬

‭●‬ ‭Conduct‬ ‭periodic‬ ‭audits‬ ‭of‬ ‭system‬ ‭configurations,‬ ‭settings,‬ ‭and‬ ‭user‬
‭permissions.‬

‭●‬ ‭Identify and rectify discrepancies or unauthorized changes.‬

‭7.‬ ‭Performance Monitoring:‬

‭●‬ ‭Implement tools for monitoring system performance and resource usage.‬

‭●‬ ‭Address performance issues promptly to ensure optimal system responsiveness.‬

‭8.‬ ‭Change Management Processes:‬

‭●‬ ‭Establish‬ ‭formal‬ ‭change‬ ‭management‬ ‭processes‬ ‭for‬ ‭system‬ ‭updates‬ ‭and‬
‭modifications.‬

‭●‬ ‭Test‬ ‭changes‬ ‭in‬ ‭a‬ ‭controlled‬ ‭environment‬ ‭before‬ ‭applying‬ ‭them‬ ‭to‬ ‭the‬ ‭live‬
‭system.‬

‭9.‬ ‭Scalability Planning:‬

‭●‬ ‭Regularly‬ ‭assess‬ ‭the‬ ‭scalability‬ ‭of‬ ‭the‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭system‬ ‭based‬ ‭on‬ ‭organizational‬
‭growth.‬

‭●‬ ‭Plan‬ ‭and‬ ‭implement‬ ‭necessary‬ ‭upgrades‬ ‭or‬ ‭enhancements‬ ‭to‬ ‭accommodate‬
‭increased demands.‬

‭10.‬‭Disaster Recovery Planning:‬

‭●‬ ‭Develop and maintain a comprehensive disaster recovery plan.‬

‭50‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭●‬ ‭Regularly‬‭test‬‭the‬‭plan‬‭to‬‭ensure‬‭a‬‭swift‬‭and‬‭effective‬‭response‬‭in‬‭the‬‭event‬‭of‬‭a‬
‭disaster.‬

‭11.‬‭Regular Software Updates:‬

‭●‬ ‭Keep the ERP system software up to date with the latest patches and updates.‬

‭●‬ ‭Schedule‬ ‭regular‬ ‭maintenance‬ ‭windows‬ ‭to‬ ‭apply‬ ‭updates‬ ‭without‬ ‭disrupting‬
‭operations.‬

‭12.‬‭Data Governance:‬

‭●‬ ‭Implement‬ ‭data‬ ‭governance‬ ‭practices‬ ‭to‬ ‭ensure‬ ‭data‬ ‭quality,‬ ‭integrity,‬ ‭and‬
‭consistency.‬

‭●‬ ‭Define and enforce data standards and policies.‬

‭13.‬‭User Feedback and Continuous Improvement:‬

‭●‬ ‭Encourage users to provide feedback on the system's usability and functionality.‬

‭●‬ ‭Use feedback to drive continuous improvement initiatives.‬

‭3.11.‬ ‭The Proposed System‬


‭Proposed System: Integrated College ERP Solution‬

‭In‬ ‭response‬ ‭to‬ ‭the‬ ‭diverse‬ ‭needs‬ ‭of‬ ‭educational‬ ‭institutions,‬ ‭we‬ ‭propose‬ ‭an‬ ‭integrated‬
‭College‬‭ERP‬‭solution‬‭that‬‭combines‬‭the‬‭essential‬‭features‬‭of‬‭various‬‭College‬‭ERP‬‭systems‬
‭into‬‭a‬‭unified‬‭platform.‬‭This‬‭comprehensive‬‭system‬‭is‬‭designed‬‭to‬‭streamline‬‭and‬‭enhance‬
‭academic,‬ ‭administrative,‬ ‭and‬ ‭financial‬ ‭processes,‬ ‭providing‬ ‭a‬‭cohesive‬‭and‬‭user-friendly‬
‭experience.‬

‭Key Features:‬

‭1.‬ ‭Student Information Management:‬


‭●‬ ‭Efficient enrollment and registration processes.‬
‭●‬ ‭Comprehensive student profiles with academic history.‬
‭2.‬ ‭Staff Information Management:‬
‭●‬ ‭Efficient enrollment and registration processes.‬
‭●‬ ‭Comprehensive Staff profiles with academic history.‬
‭3.‬ ‭Course Management:‬

‭51‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭●‬ ‭Creation and management of academic courses.‬
‭●‬ ‭Assignment of faculty and timetable generation.‬
‭4.‬ ‭Attendance Tracking:‬
‭●‬ ‭Automated attendance tracking with biometric integration.‬
‭●‬ ‭Real-time attendance records for accurate monitoring.‬
‭5.‬ ‭Grading and Transcripts:‬
‭●‬ ‭Recording and calculation of student grades.‬
‭●‬ ‭Generation of detailed academic transcripts.‬
‭6.‬ ‭Security and Access Control:‬
‭●‬ ‭Role-based access control for user security.‬
‭●‬ ‭Encryption and secure authentication.‬
‭7.‬ ‭User-friendly Interface:‬
‭●‬ ‭Intuitive UI/UX design for easy navigation.‬
‭●‬ ‭Responsive design for accessibility across devices.‬

‭3.12.‬ ‭Functional Requirements‬

‭Functional‬ ‭requirements‬ ‭for‬ ‭an‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭system‬ ‭encompass‬‭various‬‭modules‬‭and‬‭features‬


‭that‬ ‭support‬ ‭the‬ ‭management‬ ‭of‬ ‭academic,‬ ‭administrative,‬ ‭and‬ ‭financial‬ ‭processes‬
‭within‬ ‭an‬ ‭educational‬ ‭institution.‬ ‭Here‬ ‭is‬ ‭a‬ ‭comprehensive‬ ‭list‬ ‭of‬ ‭functional‬
‭requirements for our ERP system:‬
‭1.‬ ‭Student Information Management:‬
‭●‬ ‭Student enrollment and registration.‬
‭●‬ ‭Profile‬ ‭management,‬ ‭including‬ ‭personal‬ ‭details,‬ ‭contact‬ ‭information,‬ ‭and‬
‭academic history.‬
‭●‬ ‭Generation of unique student identifiers.‬
‭2.‬ ‭Course Management:‬
‭●‬ ‭Creation and management of academic courses.‬
‭●‬ ‭Assignment of faculty to courses.‬
‭●‬ ‭Course scheduling and timetable generation.‬
‭3.‬ ‭Attendance Tracking:‬
‭●‬ ‭Automated attendance tracking for students in various courses.‬
‭●‬ ‭Integration with biometric systems or RFID for accurate attendance records.‬
‭4.‬ ‭Grading and Transcripts:‬
‭●‬ ‭Recording and calculation of student grades.‬
‭52‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭●‬ ‭Transcript generation with detailed academic history.‬
‭5.‬ ‭Examination Management:‬
‭●‬ ‭Exam scheduling and timetable generation.‬
‭●‬ ‭Online and offline exam management.‬
‭●‬ ‭Result publication and analysis.‬
‭6.‬ ‭Faculty Information System:‬
‭●‬ ‭Faculty profile management.‬
‭●‬ ‭Course assignment and workload management.‬
‭●‬ ‭Leave management for faculty.‬
‭7.‬ ‭Communication and Notifications:‬
‭●‬ ‭Internal messaging system for faculty, students, and staff.‬
‭●‬ ‭Automated notifications for events, deadlines, and announcements.‬
‭8.‬ ‭Security and Access Control:‬
‭●‬ ‭Role-based access control for different user roles.‬
‭●‬ ‭Encryption of sensitive data and secure authentication.‬

‭3.13.‬‭Non - Functional Requirements‬


‭These‬ ‭non-functional‬ ‭requirements‬ ‭address‬ ‭various‬ ‭aspects‬‭of‬‭the‬‭system's‬‭behaviour,‬
‭usability, performance, and operational considerations.‬

‭3.13.1.‬ ‭Correctness‬
‭●‬ ‭The‬‭system‬‭must‬‭produce‬‭accurate‬‭results‬‭in‬‭accordance‬‭with‬‭defined‬‭business‬
‭rules and logic.‬
‭●‬ ‭Data validation checks should be implemented to ensure correctness.‬
‭3.13.2.‬ ‭User Friendly / System Interface‬
‭●‬ ‭The user interface should be intuitive and easy to navigate.‬
‭●‬ ‭Provide contextual help and documentation for users.‬
‭3.13.3.‬ ‭Response time‬
‭●‬ ‭The system should respond to user inputs within a defined time frame.‬
‭●‬ ‭Response times for critical functions should be optimized for efficiency.‬
‭3.13.4.‬ ‭Reliability‬
‭●‬ ‭The system should operate reliably without frequent disruptions.‬
‭●‬ ‭Implement fault-tolerant mechanisms to handle unexpected failures.‬

‭53‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭3.13.5.‬ ‭Performance‬
‭●‬ ‭The system should perform efficiently under various load conditions.‬
‭●‬ ‭Performance metrics should meet or exceed defined benchmarks.‬
‭3.13.6.‬ ‭Robustness‬
‭●‬ ‭The system should handle unexpected inputs and errors gracefully.‬
‭●‬ ‭Implement error handling and recovery mechanisms.‬
‭3.13.7.‬ ‭Maintainability‬
‭●‬ ‭The system should be designed for ease of maintenance and updates.‬
‭●‬ ‭Provide clear and comprehensive documentation for developers.‬
‭3.13.8.‬ ‭Effectiveness‬
‭●‬ ‭The system should effectively support users in achieving their goals.‬
‭●‬ ‭Regularly assess and enhance features based on user feedback.‬
‭3.13.9.‬ ‭Efficiency‬
‭●‬ ‭Use system resources efficiently to minimize response times.‬
‭●‬ ‭Optimize code and algorithms for resource utilization.‬

‭3.13.10.‬ ‭Portability‬
‭●‬ ‭The system should be compatible with different operating systems and devices.‬
‭●‬ ‭Ensure compatibility with major web browsers and mobile platforms.‬

‭3.13.11.‬ ‭Development Costs‬


‭●‬ ‭Manage development costs within the allocated budget.‬
‭●‬ ‭Prioritize features based on cost-benefit analysis.‬

‭3.13.12.‬ ‭Operational Costs‬


‭●‬ ‭Optimize operational costs related to hosting, maintenance, and support.‬
‭●‬ ‭Consider scalability and resource consumption in cost projections.‬

‭3.13.13.‬ ‭Security‬
‭●‬ ‭Implement robust security measures to protect against unauthorized access.‬
‭●‬ ‭Encrypt sensitive data and ensure compliance with data protection regulations.‬
‭3.13.14.‬ ‭Compatibility‬
‭●‬ ‭Ensure compatibility with existing hardware, software, and infrastructure.‬
‭●‬ ‭Provide migration paths for data and configurations from legacy systems.‬

‭3.13.15.‬ ‭Availability‬

‭54‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭●‬ ‭Aim for high system availability to minimize downtime.‬
‭●‬ ‭Implement backup and recovery strategies for quick system restoration.‬

‭CHAPTER FOUR‬
‭4.‬ ‭ANALYSIS AND DELIVERABLES OF THE NEW SYSTEM‬

‭4.1‬‭Case Study of Proposed System‬

‭Case Study: Implementation of an ERP System in XYZ College‬

‭Challenges Faced:‬
‭1.‬ ‭Siloed‬ ‭Information:‬ ‭Various‬‭departments‬‭managed‬‭data‬‭independently,‬‭leading‬
‭to duplication and inconsistency.‬
‭2.‬‭Manual‬‭Processes:‬‭Tedious‬‭manual‬‭workflows‬‭for‬‭admissions,‬‭student‬‭records,‬
‭finance, and HR resulted in inefficiencies and errors.‬
‭3.‬ ‭Lack‬ ‭of‬ ‭Integration:‬ ‭Disparate‬ ‭systems‬ ‭hindered‬ ‭collaboration‬ ‭and‬
‭decision-making across departments.‬
‭Solutions Implemented:‬
‭1.‬ ‭Requirements‬ ‭Gathering:‬ ‭Engaged‬ ‭stakeholders‬ ‭-‬ ‭faculty,‬ ‭administration,‬
‭finance,‬ ‭IT,‬ ‭and‬ ‭students‬ ‭-‬ ‭to‬ ‭understand‬ ‭pain‬ ‭points‬ ‭and‬ ‭requirements‬ ‭for‬ ‭an‬
‭integrated system.‬
‭2.‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭Selection:‬ ‭Choose‬ ‭an‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭solution‬ ‭tailored‬ ‭for‬ ‭educational‬ ‭institutions,‬
‭considering scalability, customization, and integration capabilities.‬
‭3. Architecture and Implementation:‬
‭Modules Implemented:‬
‭●‬ ‭Student‬ ‭Information‬ ‭System‬ ‭(SIS):‬ ‭Admissions,‬ ‭registration,‬ ‭grades,‬
‭schedules, etc.‬
‭●‬ ‭Human‬ ‭Resource‬ ‭Management‬ ‭(HRM):‬ ‭Employee‬ ‭information,‬ ‭payroll,‬
‭attendance, etc.‬
‭●‬ ‭Finance and Accounting:‬‭Budgeting, expenses, invoicing,‬‭etc.‬
‭●‬ ‭CRM/PRM‬‭: Student, alumni, and stakeholder interaction‬‭management.‬
‭●‬ ‭Business Intelligence:‬‭Analytics and reporting.‬
‭●‬ ‭Customization:‬ ‭Tailored‬ ‭modules‬ ‭to‬‭suit‬‭college-specific‬‭workflows‬‭while‬
‭ensuring compatibility with existing systems.‬
‭55‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭●‬ ‭Database‬ ‭and‬ ‭Infrastructure:‬ ‭Opted‬ ‭for‬ ‭a‬ ‭cloud-based‬ ‭solution‬ ‭for‬
‭scalability and accessibility.‬
‭●‬ ‭Integration‬ ‭and‬ ‭Testing:‬ ‭Ensured‬ ‭seamless‬ ‭integration‬ ‭between‬ ‭modules‬
‭and conducted rigorous testing for functionality and data accuracy.‬
‭4. Implementation Process:‬
‭Phased‬‭Rollout:‬‭Started‬‭with‬‭SIS‬‭and‬‭HRM,‬‭gradually‬‭integrating‬‭other‬‭modules‬‭over‬
‭phases to minimize disruption.‬
‭User‬‭Training:‬‭Comprehensive‬‭training‬‭programs‬‭for‬‭faculty,‬‭administration,‬‭and‬‭staff‬
‭to ensure effective utilization.‬
‭5. Results and Benefits:‬
‭●‬ ‭Streamlined‬‭Operations:‬‭Reduced‬‭manual‬‭work,‬‭improved‬‭data‬‭accuracy,‬‭and‬
‭eliminated duplication.‬
‭●‬ ‭Enhanced‬ ‭Collaboration:‬ ‭Facilitated‬ ‭cross-departmental‬ ‭collaboration‬ ‭and‬
‭data sharing.‬
‭●‬ ‭Improved‬ ‭Decision-making:‬ ‭Access‬ ‭to‬ ‭real-time‬ ‭data‬ ‭and‬ ‭analytics‬
‭empowered informed decision-making.‬
‭●‬ ‭Increased‬ ‭Efficiency:‬ ‭Automated‬ ‭workflows‬ ‭accelerated‬ ‭processes,‬ ‭saving‬
‭time and resources.‬
‭6. Post - Implementation:‬
‭●‬ ‭Support‬‭and‬‭Maintenance:‬‭Established‬‭a‬‭dedicated‬‭support‬‭team‬‭for‬‭ongoing‬
‭technical assistance and system updates.‬
‭●‬ ‭Continuous‬ ‭Improvement:‬ ‭Gathered‬ ‭feedback‬ ‭and‬ ‭made‬ ‭incremental‬
‭enhancements to address evolving needs.‬
‭7. Lessons Learned:‬
‭●‬ ‭Change‬ ‭Management:‬ ‭Importance‬ ‭of‬ ‭managing‬ ‭organizational‬ ‭change‬ ‭and‬
‭ensuring buy-in from all stakeholders.‬
‭●‬ ‭Data‬ ‭Governance:‬ ‭Maintaining‬ ‭data‬ ‭accuracy,‬ ‭integrity,‬ ‭and‬ ‭security‬ ‭as‬ ‭an‬
‭ongoing priority.‬
‭●‬ ‭Scalability:‬ ‭Ensuring‬ ‭the‬ ‭system‬ ‭is‬ ‭adaptable‬ ‭to‬ ‭future‬ ‭growth‬ ‭and‬ ‭evolving‬
‭requirements.‬
‭Conclusion:‬
‭The‬ ‭implementation‬ ‭of‬ ‭the‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭system‬ ‭transformed‬ ‭XYZ‬ ‭College's‬ ‭operations,‬
‭fostering‬ ‭efficiency,‬ ‭collaboration,‬ ‭and‬ ‭data-driven‬ ‭decision-making.‬ ‭Continuous‬

‭56‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭improvement‬‭and‬‭adaptation‬‭remain‬‭key‬‭for‬‭leveraging‬‭the‬‭system's‬‭full‬‭potential‬‭and‬
‭meeting evolving educational needs.‬

‭4.2‬‭Use Case Diagram of the System‬


‭4.2.1‬‭Descriptions of Actors:‬
‭1.‬ A ‭ dmin:‬
‭●‬ ‭Description:‬ ‭Oversees‬ ‭the‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭system,‬ ‭manages‬ ‭user‬ ‭access,‬ ‭and‬
‭handles‬ ‭critical‬ ‭administrative‬ ‭functions‬ ‭such‬ ‭as‬ ‭admissions,‬ ‭student,‬
‭and faculty management, and generating reports.‬
‭2.‬ ‭Faculty:‬
‭●‬ ‭Description:‬ ‭Academic‬ ‭staff‬ ‭responsible‬ ‭for‬ ‭teaching‬ ‭and‬ ‭research.‬
‭Utilizes‬ ‭the‬ ‭ERP‬ ‭system‬ ‭for‬ ‭recording‬ ‭grades,‬ ‭managing‬ ‭course‬
‭materials,‬ ‭communicating‬ ‭with‬‭students,‬‭and‬‭accessing‬‭student‬‭records‬
‭to streamline teaching and administrative tasks.‬
‭3.‬ ‭Student:‬
‭●‬ ‭Description:‬ ‭Enrolled‬ ‭individuals‬‭who‬‭use‬‭the‬‭ERP‬‭system‬‭to‬‭manage‬
‭their‬ ‭academic‬ ‭journey,‬ ‭including‬ ‭updating‬ ‭personal‬ ‭information,‬
‭registering‬ ‭for‬ ‭courses,‬ ‭checking‬‭grades‬‭and‬‭attendance,‬‭and‬‭accessing‬
‭course materials and notifications for a seamless learning experience.‬

‭4.2.2‬‭Descriptions of System Use Case:‬


‭1.‬ ‭Manage‬‭Student‬‭&‬‭Faculty‬‭Information:‬‭Admin,‬‭Faculty,‬‭and‬‭Staff‬‭can‬
‭view‬ ‭and‬ ‭update‬ ‭student‬ ‭details,‬ ‭academic‬ ‭records,‬ ‭and‬ ‭contact‬
‭information.‬
‭2.‬ ‭Manage‬ ‭Admissions:‬ ‭Admin‬ ‭handles‬ ‭the‬ ‭admission‬ ‭process,‬ ‭including‬
‭application reviews, acceptance, and enrollment.‬
‭3.‬ ‭Courses‬ ‭and‬ ‭Curriculum:‬ ‭Students‬ ‭and‬ ‭Admin‬ ‭manage‬ ‭course‬
‭selections, enrollment, and class schedules.‬
‭4.‬ ‭Feedback‬ ‭and‬ ‭Notifications:‬ ‭Faculty‬ ‭and‬ ‭admin‬ ‭manages‬‭the‬‭feedbacks‬
‭approaches from students and faculty and handle notifications.‬
‭5.‬ ‭Placement‬ ‭and‬ ‭Examinations:‬ ‭Various‬ ‭information‬ ‭regarding‬ ‭students,‬
‭placement and examination notices are managed by admin and faculties.‬
‭6.‬ ‭Access‬‭Reports‬‭and‬‭Students‬‭Data:‬‭Students‬‭can‬‭access‬‭their‬‭reports‬‭and‬
‭data related to their courses, performance, and personal information.‬
‭7.‬ ‭Record‬ ‭Grades‬ ‭and‬ ‭Assessments:‬ ‭Faculty‬ ‭records‬ ‭grades,‬ ‭assessments,‬
‭and academic performance, accessible to students and administrators.‬
‭8.‬ ‭Manage‬ ‭Attendance‬ ‭&‬ ‭Leaves:‬ ‭Faculty‬ ‭&‬ ‭Staff‬ ‭maintains‬ ‭Students‬
‭attendance records, handles leaves approval & rejection.‬

‭57‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭9.‬ ‭Handle‬‭Procurement‬‭and‬‭Inventory:‬‭Staff‬‭manages‬‭procurement,‬‭tracks‬
‭inventory, and handles supply chain activities.‬
‭10.‬‭Generate‬ ‭Reports‬ ‭and‬ ‭Analytics:‬ ‭Various‬ ‭stakeholders‬ ‭access‬ ‭analytics‬
‭and reports generated from different modules for decision-making.‬

‭4.2.3‬‭Use Case Diagram:‬

‭58‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭Figure-4.1: Use Case Diagram Representation for College Management‬
‭System ERP Model‬

‭59‬‭|‬‭Page‬
4‭ .3‬ ‭Class Diagram‬‭:‬
‭4.4‬ ‭Object Diagram‬‭:‬
‭4.5‬ ‭Sequence Diagram‬‭:‬

‭60‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭CHAPTER FIVE‬
‭5.‬ ‭SYSTEM DESIGN AND ARCHITECTURE‬
‭5.1.‬ ‭Introduction‬
‭Designing‬ ‭an‬ ‭Enterprise‬ ‭Resource‬ ‭Planning‬ ‭(ERP)‬ ‭system‬ ‭involves‬ ‭creating‬ ‭a‬
‭comprehensive‬ ‭framework‬ ‭that‬ ‭integrates‬ ‭various‬ ‭business‬ ‭processes‬ ‭and‬ ‭functions‬
‭into‬‭a‬‭centralized‬‭system.‬‭An‬‭ERP‬‭system‬‭for‬‭an‬‭institute‬‭involves‬‭integrating‬‭various‬
‭functionalities and processes to streamline operations. Here is an overview:‬
‭Components:‬
‭1.‬ ‭Supply Chain Management:‬
‭●‬ ‭Inventory‬‭Management:‬‭Tracks‬‭Students‬‭and‬‭Faculty,‬‭and‬‭manages‬‭inventory‬
‭effectively.‬
‭●‬ ‭Procurement: Handles salaries processes efficiently.‬
‭2.‬ ‭Human Resource Management:‬
‭●‬ ‭Employee‬ ‭&‬ ‭Student‬ ‭Database:‬ ‭Stores‬ ‭employee‬ ‭and‬ ‭student‬ ‭information‬
‭securely.‬
‭●‬ ‭Performance Management: Tracks student performance accurately.‬
‭3.‬ ‭Public/Customer Relationship Management (PRM/CRM):‬
‭●‬ ‭Manages‬ ‭interactions‬ ‭with‬ ‭stakeholders‬ ‭-‬ ‭students,‬ ‭parents,‬ ‭alumni,‬ ‭etc.,‬
‭effectively.‬ ‭Includes‬ ‭handling‬ ‭inquiries,‬ ‭providing‬ ‭support,‬ ‭and‬ ‭facilitating‬
‭seamless communication.‬
‭Architecture:‬
‭●‬ ‭Database‬ ‭Layer:‬ ‭Utilizes‬ ‭a‬ ‭central‬ ‭database(s)‬ ‭to‬ ‭store‬ ‭and‬ ‭manage‬ ‭all‬ ‭data‬
‭securely,‬ ‭with‬ ‭flexibility‬ ‭to‬ ‭choose‬ ‭between‬ ‭relational‬ ‭(SQL)‬ ‭or‬ ‭NoSQL‬
‭databases based on requirements.‬
‭●‬ ‭Server‬‭Infrastructure:‬‭Could‬‭be‬‭on-premises‬‭or‬‭cloud-based,‬‭leveraging‬‭cloud‬
‭advantages such as scalability and accessibility.‬
‭●‬ ‭Front-end‬ ‭Interface:‬ ‭Offers‬ ‭web-based‬ ‭or‬ ‭mobile‬ ‭interfaces‬ ‭for‬ ‭user‬
‭interaction, with responsive design for accessibility on various devices.‬
‭●‬ ‭Middleware/Integration‬‭Layer:‬‭Connects‬‭various‬‭modules,‬‭manages‬‭data‬‭flow,‬
‭and‬ ‭ensures‬ ‭smooth‬ ‭communication‬ ‭between‬ ‭different‬ ‭parts‬ ‭of‬ ‭the‬ ‭system‬
‭seamlessly.‬

‭61‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭●‬ ‭Security‬ ‭Layer:‬ ‭Implements‬ ‭encryption,‬ ‭authentication‬ ‭mechanisms,‬ ‭access‬
‭controls,‬ ‭and‬ ‭conducts‬ ‭regular‬ ‭security‬ ‭audits‬ ‭to‬ ‭protect‬ ‭sensitive‬ ‭data‬
‭effectively.‬

‭5.2.‬ ‭DFD‬
‭5.2.1.‬‭Context Data Flow Diagram‬

‭Figure-5.1: Zero Level DFD‬

‭5.2.2.‬‭N Level of Data Flow Diagram‬

‭62‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭Figure-5.2: 2 Level DFD‬

‭5.3.‬ ‭Entity Relationship Diagram‬

‭63‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭Figure-5.3: ER Diagram for College Management System‬

5‭ .4.‬ L‭ ogical Model‬


‭5.5.‬ ‭Physical Model‬

‭64‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭5.6.‬ ‭Normalization of Data Base‬
‭Normalization‬ ‭in‬ ‭database‬ ‭design‬ ‭aims‬ ‭to‬ ‭organize‬ ‭data‬ ‭efficiently‬ ‭by‬ ‭reducing‬
‭redundancy‬ ‭and‬ ‭dependency‬ ‭while‬ ‭maintaining‬ ‭data‬ ‭integrity.‬ ‭It‬ ‭involves‬
‭structuring‬ ‭a‬ ‭relational‬ ‭database‬ ‭to‬ ‭minimize‬ ‭duplication,‬ ‭prevent‬ ‭anomalies,‬ ‭and‬
‭enhance‬ ‭data‬ ‭consistency.‬ ‭This‬ ‭process‬ ‭follows‬ ‭various‬ ‭normal‬ ‭forms‬ ‭(1NF,‬‭2NF,‬
‭3NF, BCNF, 4NF, 5NF), each specifying rules for organizing data effectively.‬
‭First Normal Form (1NF):‬
‭●‬ ‭Eliminates‬ ‭repeating‬ ‭groups‬ ‭within‬ ‭a‬ ‭table‬ ‭by‬ ‭ensuring‬ ‭that‬ ‭each‬ ‭column‬
‭contains atomic (indivisible) values.‬
‭●‬ ‭All‬ ‭columns‬ ‭should‬ ‭contain‬ ‭only‬ ‭single‬ ‭values,‬ ‭and‬ ‭each‬ ‭row‬ ‭should‬ ‭be‬
‭uniquely identifiable.‬
‭Second Normal Form (2NF):‬
‭●‬ ‭Builds‬ ‭on‬ ‭1NF‬ ‭and‬ ‭eliminates‬ ‭partial‬ ‭dependencies‬ ‭by‬ ‭ensuring‬ ‭that‬ ‭all‬
‭non-key attributes are fully dependent on the primary key.‬
‭●‬ ‭A‬‭table‬‭is‬‭in‬‭2NF‬‭if‬‭it‬‭is‬‭in‬‭1NF‬‭and‬‭all‬‭non-key‬‭attributes‬‭are‬‭dependent‬‭on‬
‭the entire primary key, not just a part of it.‬
‭Third Normal Form (3NF):‬
‭●‬ ‭Builds‬ ‭on‬ ‭2NF‬ ‭and‬ ‭eliminates‬ ‭transitive‬ ‭dependencies‬ ‭by‬ ‭ensuring‬ ‭that‬
‭non-key attributes are not dependent on other non-key attributes.‬
‭●‬ A
‭ ‬ ‭table‬ ‭is‬ ‭in‬ ‭3NF‬ ‭if‬ ‭it‬ ‭is‬ ‭in‬ ‭2NF‬ ‭and‬ ‭there‬ ‭are‬ ‭no‬ ‭transitive‬‭dependencies‬
‭between non-key attributes.‬

‭Figure- 5.6: Normalization of Database‬

‭65‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭5.7.‬ ‭Activity Diagram‬

‭Figure- 5.7: Activity Diagram‬


‭5.8.‬ ‭Collaboration Diagram‬

‭66‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭5.9.‬ ‭State Diagram‬

‭Figure- 5.9: State Diagram‬

‭67‬‭|‬‭Page‬
5‭ .10.‬‭Component Diagram‬
‭5.11.‬‭Deployment Diagram‬
‭5.12.‬‭Persistence Diagram‬

‭68‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭5.13.‬‭User Interface Design‬

‭69‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭70‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭Figure- 5.13: User Interface Snapshots‬

‭71‬‭|‬‭Page‬
‭REFERENCES‬

‭●‬ ‭https://www.sap.com/india/products/erp/what-is-erp.html#:~:text=ERP%20stands‬
‭%20for%20enterprise%20resource,services%2C%20procurement%2C%20and%2‬
‭0others.‬
‭●‬ ‭https://www.oracle.com/in/erp/what-is-erp/‬
‭●‬ ‭https://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/erp.asp‬
‭●‬ ‭https://camudigitalcampus.com/cloud-campus-management-software-ppc-india-202‬
‭3/?utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=search&keyword=colle‬
‭ge%20erp&location=9061679&adgroup=153797812531&gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0‬
‭KCQiA7OqrBhD9ARIsAK3UXh3OplhCG9CVAmTFjyzJSTuh4lhEMB8aoRFvfsN‬
‭ALiveYTX1o02cbH0aAjLFEALw_wcB‬
‭●‬ ‭https://www.sonetmicrosystems.com/products/college-erp-software.php#:~:text=Coll‬
‭ege%20management%20systems%20are%20cloud,assignments%2C%20library%‬
‭20books%20and%20more.‬
‭●‬ ‭https://chat.openai.com/‬
‭●‬ ‭https://www.ibm.com/topics/software-testing‬
‭●‬ ‭https://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/sample-test-cases-for-testing-graphs-and-chart‬
‭s/‬
‭●‬ ‭https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/software-engineering-structure-charts/‬
‭●‬ ‭https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos-basic-skills?topic=zos-what-is-database-managem‬
‭ent-system‬
‭●‬ ‭https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/database-design-basics-eb2159cf-1e30-40‬
‭1a-8084-bd4f9c9ca1f5‬
‭●‬ ‭https://www.djangoproject.com/‬
‭●‬ ‭https://www.w3schools.com/html/‬
‭●‬ ‭https://www.w3schools.com/css/‬
‭●‬ ‭https://jquery.com/‬
‭●‬ ‭https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript‬
‭●‬ ‭https://github.com/‬

‭72‬‭|‬‭Page‬

You might also like