Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Background
commodities, and services. It was founded by a man named Kenneth Lay in the
merger of two; the merged company, HNG InterNorth, was renamed Enron in 1986.
The company was located in Houston, Texas, in the United States of America.
However, they also had, at the same time, some overseas assets.
At its peak, before its bankruptcy, Enron was once worth 70 billion US dollars,
Enron was formed in 1985 by Kenneth Lay in the merger of Houston Natural Gas
and InterNorth. By the time Jeffrey Skilling became the company's chief operating
officer, Enron had transformed itself into an energy trader and supplier. Under
Skilling's leadership, Enron was able to generate huge profits on its trades and, as a
result, became a leader in the market for natural-gas contracts. One of Skilling's
As Enron faced increased competition and profits decreased rapidly; however, they
used MTM to hide financial losses and other operations of the company. This
allowed Enron to write unrealized future gains from trading contracts into current
income statements. Moreover, if the revenue from an asset were less than the
projected amount, the company would transfer the asset to special purpose entities
(SPEs) owned by Enron's chief financial officer Andrew Fastow, abusing the practice
by making the losses go unreported and appear less severe than they really were.
This type of accounting allowed Enron to hide losses and make the company look
profitable.
Besides Lay and Skilling, another major player in the scandal was Enron's
accounting firm, Arthur Andersen, one of the largest and most reputable accounting
firms in the United States. Despite this, they ignored, failed to report, and played a
part in the questionable accounting and auditing practices surrounding the Enron
scandal. Moreover, the accounting firm shredded documents and evidence related to
Enron audits.
Around this time, Enron announced its first quarterly loss, which caught the attention
of the SEC and made them begin an investigation on transactions between Enron
and Fastow's SPEs. As the details of the accounting fraud were discovered, the
company started to collapse. Fastow was fired from the company. Enron had losses
of $591 million and also $690 million in debt. Enron filed for bankruptcy on
December 2, 2001.
e. Main Players in the Story
Ø Kenneth Lay - the business's founder, chairman, and CEO, was the primary culprit
making false public assertions about the profitability of the company. When he saw
that the company was going out of business, he sold his stock while simultaneously
encouraging his staff to make additional stock purchases. While Enron's stock was
falling rapidly in the days leading up to the company's bankruptcy, the company's top
executives were able to sell $1 billion worth of shares. In contrast, the stocks of
Ø Jeffrey Skilling - who later became the Chief Operating Officer, employed a
method of accounting called mark to market (MTM), which enabled Enron to register
Ø Andy Fastow, - The Chief Financial Officer of Enron, kept the company's stock
price unnaturally high by hiding the company's debts and losses through the use of
Ø Lou Pai - the Chief Executive Officer of Enron Energy Services He utilized the
company jet for his own personal travel and charged his own expenses to the Enron
Ø Tim Belden - who oversaw the trading desk for Enron's west coast operations,
including Arthur Anderson, a firm specializing in accounting, Vinson & Elkins, a firm
II.Analysis – Using the Applicable Financial Analysis and How could the scandal be
In 1990, Jefferey Skilling joined the company and introduced the MTM
technique. This technique was innovative then; however, it used fair value instead of
book value. They use projected earnings more than actual earnings, and when there
are losses, they put the losses on an offshore company. To prevent this, we suggest
that Enron should not use the MTM technique and give reasons to be sure.
In the 90s, many companies due to being too aggressive and fooling many investors
into investing, thereby vastly inflating the worth of the company way more than its
actual worth. Of course, we would suggest that Enron take investors without
overinflation. The need for investors was that Enron also had competitors. Instead of
vastly overinflating its actual worth, Enron should rather market itself as innovative or
something trendy for the 90s. It is not illegal to market themselves as innovative or
something worth investing in. Just don't take too many investments, more than the
bank. At the same time, Enron was too aggressive at mergers and other business
dealings. Instead of the aggressive approach, use the moderate one and market
Another accounting technique Enron used that allowed inflating revenues further was
the "merchant model," in which the entire value of each of its trades is reported as
conventional "agent model" used by other trading companies wherein only the
should perform their duties up to the standards and uphold their ethics in auditing so
as to detect red flags in the financial statements and fraudulent practices, as well as
alert the public and report to the proper authorities when needed.
After it was discovered that the firm's values and norms were being altered by
the organizational structure that had been implemented, the corporation should have
been forced to abandon the structure and find a new one to use instead. The
company, rather than the newly established internal authority, should have been in
charge of conducting the review of the staff members. The culture of independence
and "keeping an eye out for one another "would not have been sufficient if this had
been done, as the reviews would have been honest as a result. Additionally, the new
members of management should have been granted the autonomy and ability to
younger managers and assists them in adjusting to their new roles within the
organization.
The management team of the corporation should have been more outspoken
regarding the state of the company's finances. The management of the company
ought to have been equipped with mechanisms that would have required it to report
and make available to shareholders the report on the balance sheet. It is important
prevent problems similar to those that plagued Enron. This is due to the possibility
that, if given the opportunity to run the firm without any oversight, they will collide
with one another and bring the corporation to its knees, just as Enron did.
IV References
https://www.britannica.com/event/Enron-scandal
Dharan, B. G., & Bufkins, W. R. (2008). Red flags in Enron's reporting of revenues &
https://nac-cna.ca/en/englishtheatre/studyguide/enron/background
Segal, T. (2021, November 27). Investopedia: Enron Scandal The Fall of a Wall
summary/