Writing a literature review can be a daunting task for many students and researchers.

It requires
extensive research, critical analysis, and concise writing to effectively summarize existing literature
on a particular topic. The process can be time-consuming and overwhelming, especially for those new
to academic writing or unfamiliar with the structure and requirements of a literature review.

One of the biggest challenges in writing a literature review is synthesizing a vast amount of
information from various sources into a coherent and cohesive narrative. It involves not only
summarizing the key findings and arguments of different studies but also evaluating their
methodological rigor, theoretical framework, and relevance to the research topic. Additionally, writers
must identify gaps in the existing literature and propose avenues for future research.

Another difficulty is ensuring that the literature review is well-organized and flows logically from
one point to the next. Writers must carefully structure their review to guide readers through the key
themes, debates, and controversies in the field while maintaining clarity and coherence.

Moreover, maintaining objectivity and avoiding bias can be challenging, especially when dealing
with controversial or conflicting viewpoints. Writers must critically evaluate the strengths and
weaknesses of each study and present a balanced perspective that reflects the complexity of the topic.

Given the complexities involved, many students and researchers opt to seek assistance with writing
their literature reviews. ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers professional writing services to help individuals
navigate the challenges of crafting a high-quality literature review. With a team of experienced
writers who are well-versed in academic writing conventions and proficient in various subject areas,
⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ can provide expert guidance and support to ensure that your literature review
meets the highest standards of quality and professionalism.

Whether you're struggling to get started or need assistance with polishing your draft, ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔ is here to help. Place your order today and let us assist you in creating a literature
review that is thorough, insightful, and compelling.
The proper sequence allows moving from one question to another, avoiding chaos in writing. E.g., a
body part in the standard literature review samples often is organized chronologically, moving from
the older findings to the newest research. This question aims to assess whether reported prevalence
rates of disordered eating and EDs differ across ethnic groups. Any opinions or recommendations
discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. In simple words, what key
points will be added to the body part. Here are examples of other sections, usually in the form of a
single paragraph, you may need to include depending on the type of review you write: Current
Situation: Information necessary to understand the current topic or focus of the literature review.
Digital Sales Sell your publications commission-free as single issues or ongoing subscriptions.
However, studies on laser acupuncture regarding this specific theme are scarce, in spite of the
reported advantages of this technique over the use of needles. Telescopic overdenture on natural
teeth: prosthetic rehabilitation on (OFD) syndromic patient and a review on available literature.
Please include what you were doing when this page came up and the Cloudflare Ray ID found at the
bottom of this page. Then, just as you would for most other academic forms of writing, rewrite or
rework the language of your review so that you’ve presented your information in the most concise
manner possible. This is where you’ll present, analyse, evaluate and synthesise the existing research.
It provides an overview of current knowledge, allowing you to identify relevant theories, methods,
and gaps in the existing research that you can later apply to your paper, thesis, or dissertation topic.
However, humanities and social sciences give more room regarding the age of sources used. JN is
lead convenor of the Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group. VGTI is seeking
professional-track faculty candidates with demonstrated potential for creative collaborations in
infectious disease. The randomization process reported 100% of the studies with a low risk of bias.
The purpose, rather, is to demonstrate how considering various arguments and approaches improves
our understanding essay hvor lang engages us in new questions. It can easily export data to a review
processor for desktop publishing of references. Where plentiful reviews already exist, a team may
decide to conduct a review of reviews 5 by including multiple QES within a mega-synthesis 28 29 (
table 2, item R6). Generally, for my undergraduate research students, I recommend a narrative
review, where themes can be generated in order for the students to develop sufficient understanding
of the topic so they can build upon the themes using unique methods or novel research questions.
Pivotal publications: are there any influential theories or studies that changed the direction of the
field. Furthermore, data suggests that laser acupuncture is a highly successful treatment for TMJ
problems. For those for whom conservative therapy was selected, laser acupuncture is a safe,
noninvasive, and efficient therapeutic choice since it lessens the chronic pain linked to TMD and has
no negative side effects. The narrower your topic, the easier it will be to limit the number of sources
you need to read in order to get a good survey of the material. You will often see the terms “the
research,” “the scholarship,” and “the literature” used mostly interchangeably. Such use will assist
panels in reviewing large numbers of studies and documenting each by stated relevancy criteria. Give
a thorough overview of each theme, integrating source data, and conclude with a summary of the
current state of knowledge then suggestions for future research based upon your evaluation of what
is lacking in the literature. Our sample literature review documents contain examples, guidelines, and
sample brief information about literature review writing and research paper. The content will look
slightly different in each case, but the process of conducting a literature review follows the same
steps. If our above questions meet your queries, then you have landed to the right destination.
Specifically, whenever a QES is abbreviated or accelerated, a team should ensure that the review
question is agreed by a minimum number of knowledge users with expertise or experience that
reflects all the important review perspectives and with authority to approve the final version 2 5 11 (
table 2, item R1).
The body of your literature review should do just as the description of this chapter suggests. The
sources include government simple reports, IT software websites, scholarly articles, etc. Does the
research use established frameworks or take an innovative approach. Further Readings Generative AI
and Writing USC Libraries Tutorials and Other Guides Bibliography A literature review surveys prior
research published in books, scholarly articles, and any other sources relevant to a particular issue,
area of research, or theory, and by so doing, provides a description, summary, and critical evaluation
of these works in relation to the research problem being investigated. Frodeman, Robert. The Oxford
Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. Debates, conflicts and contradictions: where do sources disagree.
You can use our template to summarize and evaluate sources you’re thinking about using. The
thematic approach is the most common approach and is useful for structuring literature reviews in
most fields. Nevertheless, the thesis is expected to demonstrate that you have read a lot and can
show the findings to the interested audience. The introduction should clearly establish the focus and
purpose of the literature review. Is there any detailed template, additional to this. With my
undergraduate research students (who tend to conduct small-scale qualitative studies ), I encourage
them to conduct a narrative literature review whereby they can identify key themes in the literature.
Comprehensive knowledge of the literature of the field is essential to most research papers. Maybe
you’re on the verge of getting a doctorate and want a literature review to be just ideal. Relevant
literature will also be identified from the reference lists of included studies. We will provide a
descriptive numerical summary of the characteristics of included studies. Brindley, Geoff (2001).
Assessment. In R. Carter and D. Nunan (Eds). The. To this end, they conducted a comprehensive
search on multiple databases using highly sensitive search strategies without language or publication-
type restrictions to identify all rct s that are eligible for inclusion. If a single reviewer undertakes full-
text screening, 8 the team should identify likely risks to trustworthiness of findings and focus quality
control procedures (eg, use of additional reviewers and percentages for double screening) on specific
threats 14 ( table 2, item R13). Bring your conclusion to a close by identifying and discussing the
significance of a specific research question that will drive the rest of your research project. Published
examples typically use a single reviewer for data extraction 8 with use of two independent reviewers
being the exception. It is often assigned as part of the research process for a paper. The present
scoping review aims to examine the extent, range and nature of research activity into disordered
eating and EDs in the UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand providing a comprehensive overview
of the existing literature. The overall ranking showed no studies with low risk of bias. This may
include empirical studies or conceptual papers that initiated a line of investigation, changed how
problems or questions were framed, introduced new methods or concepts, or engendered important
debate ( Cooper, 1988 ). Right? Wrong! The “literature” of a literature review refers to any collection
of materials on a topic, not necessarily the great literary texts of the world. “Literature” could be
anything from a set of government pamphlets on British colonial methods in Africa to scholarly
articles on the treatment of a torn ACL. Understanding the use of balanced scorecard in the context
of state owned ent. However, only include what is necessary for the reader to locate your study
within the larger scholarship about the research problem. A pre-existing framework, where readily
identified, may help to structure the data extraction template. 15 37 The same framework may be
used to present the findings. If the same authors, books or articles keep appearing in your reading,
make sure to seek them out.
This helps you remember what you read and saves time later in the process. The stage was set for a
more balanced style of evaluation. Acupuncture medical therapy and its underlying mechanisms: a
systematic review. This is the reason, many literature reviews are mistily focused. Much of the
information used in an annotated bibliography can be used also in a literature review, so you’ll be
not only partially drafting your lit review as you research, but also developing your sense of the
larger conversation going on among scholars, professionals, and any other stakeholders in your topic.
AB led on drafting the work and revising it critically for important intellectual content. For instance,
Levy and Ellis (2006) proposed a generic framework for conducting such reviews. Publication
performance and trends in bruxism research: A bibliometric analysis. Usually, it’s unnecessary, but if
an abstract is mentioned in the requirements, consider adding it to the working plan. Methodological
If you draw your sources from different disciplines or fields that use a variety of research methods,
you might want to compare the results and conclusions that emerge from different approaches.
Studies will be classified and grouped according to their characteristics. Once you’ve decided on the
organizational method for the body of the review, the sections you need to include in the paper
should be easy to figure out. Is there any detailed template, additional to this. Sample 1 (PDF) A
brief literature review within a political scientists’ National Science Foundation Graduate Research
Fellowship grant Sample 2 (PDF) A several-page literature review at the beginning of a published,
academic article about philosophy Sample 3 (PDF) A brief literature review at the beginning of a
published, academic article about photochemistry Academic and Professional Writing This is an
accordion element with a series of buttons that open and close related content panels. Resources
Dive into our extensive resources on the topic that interests you. If necessary, as we become more
familiar with the existing literature our research questions will be refined and modified accordingly.
You should also determine such guidelines as the number of sources to include, the source types,
and how to format your paper. The Wow-effect can be achieved only if you focus all your efforts on
this task or if you contact professional writers and request for assistance. In comparison to the
placebo group, the VAS ratings, the masseter, the temporal tendon, and the insertion of the internal
pterygoid muscles, as well as the overall pain intensity, were all considerably reduced in the LLLT
and LAT groups. The clearer and narrower your focus, the deeper you can dive into the topic (which
is typically where the magic lies). Issues with the academic writing style and field-specific
terminology just make matters worse. It is our hope that our descriptive account will serve as a
valuable source for those conducting, evaluating or using reviews in this important and growing
domain. A rigorous example of one such review in the eHealth domain is presented by Mickan,
Atherton, Roberts, Heneghan, and Tilson (2014) on the use of handheld computers by healthcare
professionals and their impact on access to information and clinical decision-making. Data to be
extracted will include some standard information about the paper. Effects of CB2 receptor
modulation on macrophage polarization in Pediatric Celiac Disease. Then you look up a book written
in 1968 with information on how sperm whales have been portrayed in other forms of art, such as in
Alaskan poetry, in French painting, or on whale bone, as the whale hunters in the late 19th century
used to do. Five key themes were found in the literature: poor communication can lead to various
negative outcomes, discontinuity of care, compromise of patient safety, patient dissatisfaction, and
inefficient use of resources. For scholars, the depth and breadth of the literature review emphasizes
the credibility of the writer in his or her field. First, exhaustive coverage means an effort is made to
be as comprehensive as possible in order to ensure that all relevant studies, published and
unpublished, are included in the review and, thus, conclusions are based on this all-inclusive
knowledge base. Make a list of keywords Start by creating a list of keywords related to your
research question.
Once the issue is clarified, sticking to it without giving any unnecessary information is essential.
Body: Contains your discussion of sources and is organized either chronologically, thematically, or
methodologically (see below for more information on each). Steps in the Literature Review Process
Define your research question Determine inclusion and exclusion criteria Choose databases and
search Review Results Synthesize Results Analyze Results Librarian Support What is a Literature
Review. When we say “literature review” or refer to “the literature,” we are talking about the
research ( scholarship ) in a given field. Point the way in fulfilling a need for additional research.
Question 6: do ED treatment experiences differ across ethnic groups. A summary is a recap of the
important information of the source, whereas a synthesis is a re-organization, or a reshuffling, of that
information. Prevalence of oral behaviours in general dental patients attending a university clinic in
Italy. Theories may be unearthed within the topic search or be already known to team members, fro
example, Theory of Planned Behaviour. 29 Options for managing the quantity and quality of studies
and data emerge during the scoping (see above). Take notes and cite your sources As you read, you
should also begin the writing process. Panel Chair s may review this search themselves, or they may
send it to review literatures. Those templates are collected online so we do not claim the ownership
of those templates. According to that, nobody is allowed to share your information with those from
outside. The main focus of an academic research paper is to develop a new argument, and a research
paper is likely to contain a literature review as one of its parts. Pivotal publications: are there any
influential theories or studies that changed the direction of the field. We researched the most
effective protective measures and put them into practice, which made our platform riskless. When
doing and writing a literature review, it is good practice to: summarise and analyse previous research
and theories; identify areas of controversy and contested claims; highlight any gaps that may exist in
research to date. However high efficacy of Laser Acupuncture in the treatment of
temporomandibular disorders was reported. The following data were extracted and included in Table
1. These are people interested in the same issues and who are usually working in a similar field. You
will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Of course, your professor will not expect you to read every source on the topic. Competing interests
AB is co-convenor of the Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group. There is an
increasing interest in the visual aspects of social media. The present scoping review aims to identify
and describe studies reporting on disordered eating and EDs in minority ethnic groups in the UK,
Canada, Australia and New Zealand; to our knowledge, this will be the first review to do so.
Rudestam, K.E. and Newton, R.R. (1992) Surviving your dissertation: A comprehensive guide to
content and process. Let’s Recap In this article, we’ve discussed how to structure your literature
review for maximum impact. However, sometimes you may need to add additional sections that are
necessary for your study, but do not fit in the organizational strategy of the body. Social Posts Create
on-brand social posts and Articles in minutes.
It also ensures neither the research analysis was done before nor it is a replication study. Conclude by
providing some insight into the relationship between the central topic of the literature review and a
larger area of study such as a discipline, a scientific endeavor, or a profession. Prevalence of oral
behaviours in general dental patients attending a university clinic in Italy. There are various
approaches to organizing the body of a literature review. It is important to make sure that the same
subject is presented in every source as well as your own dissertation. Literature reviews are written
occasionally in the humanities, but mostly in the sciences and social sciences; in experiment and lab
reports, they constitute a section of the paper. Clinical effectiveness of laser acupuncture: a
systematic review. Brilliant work, well understood, many thanks I like how this was so clear with
simple language. Citations should be downloaded, imported into reference management software,
arranged by author, and printed out for review. If you are writing the literature review section of a
dissertation or research paper, you will search for literature related to your research problem and
questions. Conducting a literature review Focusing on different aspects of your literature review can
be useful to help plan, develop, refine and write it. Like descriptive reviews, the research questions
are generic and usually relate to publication patterns and trends. Hire a verified Ph.D. and get a
thorough overview of topic-relevant sources. Your reactions and conclusions are important; so, make
your own arguments. The basic research question — what works? — which is usually associated
with systematic reviews changes to: what is it about this intervention that works, for whom, in what
circumstances, in what respects and why. Hamilton found that people imagined 3.3 men to each
woman in the masculine “generic” condition and 1.5 men per woman in the unbiased condition. How
much of the review should be theoretical?” and so on. Identify the gaps in the literature and show
how your research links to these. A young researcher's guide to writing a literature review 4 min
read. For example: Look at what results have emerged in qualitative versus quantitative research
Discuss how the topic has been approached by empirical versus theoretical scholarship Divide the
literature into sociological, historical, and cultural sources Theoretical A literature review is often the
foundation for a theoretical framework. The team should consider whether a conceptual model,
theory or framework offers a rapid way for organising, coding, interpreting and presenting findings (
table 2, item R18). Efficacy of acupuncture and laser acupuncture in temporomandibular The aim of
this study is to perform a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the scientific literature regarding the
use of acupuncture and laser acupuncture in the treatment of pain associated with
temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). Starting is the hardest thing, especially if it’s a literature
review. Their in-depth analysis of the literature signalled that there is little solid evidence from
randomized controlled trials or other studies through the use of phr s. What other sections you
include in the body is up to you. Performance Measurement in Service Businesses London: The
Chartered Institute of. Telescopic overdenture on natural teeth: prosthetic rehabilitation on (OFD)
syndromic patient and a review on available literature. Critical thinking As with other forms of
academic writing, your literature review needs to demonstrate good academic practice by following
the Code of Student Conduct and acknowledging the work of others through citing and referencing
your sources. The focus of a literature review is to summarize and synthesize the arguments and ideas
of others without adding new contributions, whereas academic research papers present and develop
new arguments that build upon the previously available body of literature. Simply following an
example may not be enough, so asking a writing expert for help is a good option.
It is a process of reviewing the literature, as well as a form of writing. I am doing a research on
nanofluids how can l structure it. Each stage will involve two reviewers independently screening the
identified studies against the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The pool of writers on this platform
encompasses experts in every literature review type. A scoping review was chosen as the most
appropriate methodology. Your instructor will probably not expect you to read everything that’s out
there on the topic, but you’ll make your job easier if you first limit your scope. This is particularly
true in disciplines in medicine and the sciences where research conducted becomes obsolete very
quickly as new discoveries are made. Many student writers struggle to synthesize because they feel
they don’t have anything to add to the scholars they are citing; here are some strategies to help you:
It often helps to remember that the point of these kinds of syntheses is to show your readers how
you understand your research, to help them read the rest of your paper. One needs to inform the
objective of the review in the initial paragraphs. If data and resources permit, qualitative findings
relating to treatment experiences of minority ethnic individuals will be synthesised following
Thomas and Harden’s 35 thematic synthesis approach. It’s necessary at least to be a perfect writer,
information seeker, and analyst. Does it confirm, add to, or challenge established knowledge. As you
present your evaluation, do out cautiously with thorough carry why explanation. You have not
worked on papers of such kinds before; thus, it is not clear for you how you should plan your work
and how to make your assigned literature review successful from the perspective of your professor.
Source: O verview: This study examines the relationship between cholesterol and Alzheimer’s
disease (AD). Adobe InDesign Design pixel-perfect content like flyers, magazines and more with
Adobe InDesign. Identify areas of prior scholarship to prevent duplication of effort. Nevertheless,
the thesis is expected to demonstrate that you have read a lot and can show the findings to the
interested audience. You do proper evaluation of the discovered sources and your readers should
know for sure that academic sources are valid. To this end, they conducted a comprehensive search
on multiple databases using highly sensitive search strategies without language or publication-type
restrictions to identify all rct s that are eligible for inclusion. The literature review gives you a chance
to: Demonstrate your familiarity with the topic and its scholarly context Develop a theoretical
framework and methodology for your research Position your work in relation to other researchers and
theorists Show how your research addresses a gap or contributes to a debate Evaluate the current
state of research and demonstrate your knowledge of the scholarly debates around your topic. Look
at sources the authors cite to in their work. Where plentiful reviews already exist, a team may decide
to conduct a review of reviews 5 by including multiple QES within a mega-synthesis 28 29 ( table 2,
item R6). Each kind has its special purpose and particularities. Involvement of topic experts can
ensure that the rQES is responsive to need. 14 17 One Cochrane rQES saved considerable time by
agreeing the review topic within a single meeting and one-phase iteration. 9 Decisions on topics to be
omitted are also informed by a knowledge of existing QESs. 17 An information specialist can help to
manage the quantity and quality of available evidence by setting conceptual boundaries and logistic
limits. For example, weave references to other sources into what you are writing but maintain your
own voice by starting and ending the paragraph with your own ideas and wording. But there is
relatively no continuity among subjects here. You can use our free APA Reference Generator for
quick, correct, consistent citations. You have now created a draft of a Short Literature Review. The
images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons
licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.
Eligibility criteria will be further refined and finalised following the first round of screening if
necessary. Question 1: what topics are being addressed by the current literature. All eleven RCTs
reported the results in terms of pain intensity by VAS. Retrieval and copying requires a high level of
effort. Systematic Review Examples This type of literature review is more structured and rigorous
than a narrative review. Acquiring the vocabulary of the discussion is an important part of being able
to carry yourself with clarity and precision. To achieve this, your literature review needs a well-
thought-out structure. 15 Literature Review Examples (2024) Also known as a traditional literature
review, the narrative review provides a broad overview of the studies done on a particular topic. Ann
Arbor, Michigan Jolanta Grembecka, PhD, Professor Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter —
what matters in science, free to your inbox daily. Provenance and peer review Not commissioned;
externally peer reviewed. Systematic searches were conducted in 3 electronic databases up to July
2023; PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases. When considering the studies to include in this
analysis, 2 groups were identified and selected based on the criteria required for the systematic
review. There are various referencing styles, and non-compliance with them might affect your grade.
Current Cochrane guidance informs selection of tools for quality assessment and of synthesis
method. Put a flag on it. A busy developer's guide to feature toggles. Further, the guideline
development process literatures searching on a much larger scale than is usually done by most
researchers or librarians. These authors synthesized published articles that describe the development
process of mobile health ( m-health ) interventions for patients’ cancer care self-management. Include
each of the key concepts or variables you’re interested in, and list any synonyms and related terms.
You can add to this list as you discover new keywords in the process of your literature search. If you
read a source and find that it has nothing or little of value to offer on your topic and research
question, then do not include it in the literature review case study benchmarking the first place.
Focus on the questions you want to raise and analyze whether the part of a review is too general or
insufficiently wide. It would not offer appropriate solutions for not-for-. Issues with the academic
writing style and field-specific terminology just make matters worse. VGTI is seeking professional-
track faculty candidates with demonstrated potential for creative collaborations in infectious disease.
Please do not use this list as a model for the format of your own reference list, as it may not match
the citation style you are using. Each literature review research paper is created from scratch based
on your instructions. Instead, looking for similar themes and subjects, you are supposed to discuss
how different researchers approached the same issues. Thank you very much, very helpful This is
very educative and precise. If you have limited time to conduct research, literature reviews can give
you an overview or act as a stepping stone. Nobody wants to have their reputation damaged by a
written literature review that contains plagiarism. Please include what you were doing when this
page came up and the Cloudflare Ray ID found at the bottom of this page. Frameworks, Warwick:
Warwick Business School Research Paper.