Crafting a literature review for your Statement of Purpose can be a daunting task.

It requires
meticulous research, critical analysis, and effective synthesis of existing scholarly works to provide a
comprehensive understanding of the topic at hand. The process involves sifting through numerous
academic articles, books, and other sources to identify relevant literature and evaluate its
significance to your research objectives.

Writing a literature review demands not only a thorough understanding of the subject matter but also
strong analytical and writing skills to effectively summarize, critique, and integrate the findings of
various studies. It requires the ability to identify gaps in existing research and articulate how your
study contributes to filling those gaps.

Moreover, adhering to academic standards and citation styles adds another layer of complexity to the
task. Failure to properly cite sources or accurately represent existing literature can lead to accusations
of plagiarism or academic dishonesty, jeopardizing the integrity of your work.

Given the challenges associated with writing a literature review, seeking professional assistance can
be a wise decision. ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers expert guidance and support to students and
researchers struggling with their literature reviews. Our team of experienced writers specializes in
crafting high-quality literature reviews tailored to your specific requirements. By entrusting your
literature review to ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can ensure that your Statement of Purpose reflects a
thorough understanding of the existing literature and positions your research within the broader
scholarly conversation.

Don't let the complexities of writing a literature review hinder your academic or professional
aspirations. Order from ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ today and take the first step towards achieving your
goals.
Your educational institution may also require them, so be sure to check their specific guidelines.
Bisphosphonate use and the risk of undergoing total knee arthroplasty in osteoporotic patients with
osteoarthritis: a nationwide cohort study in Taiwan. Is the author's perspective too biased in one
direction or are opposing studies and viewpoints also considered. Academic dishonesty refers to
deceitful or misleading behavior in an academic setting. Not convinced yet? Send in your free sample
today and see for yourself. How to write a literature review Purpose of the literature review The
purpose of the literature review is to provide a critical written account of the current state of research
on a selected topic: Identifies areas of prior scholarship; Places each source in the context of its
contribution to the understanding of the specific issue, area of research, or theory under review. They
are also commonly used in nursing and healthcare, or as a brainstorming technique for students. It’s a
non-experimental type of quantitative research. It is advisable then to reformulate such quotes with
your own words in the final draft. Authority: It’s just a language model and is not considered a
trustworthy source of factual information. If your paper does not depend entirely on references, then
it will be short. It is always good to have a condensed summary that is self-contained and
independent of the rest of your review. Fink, Arlene. Conducting Research Literature Reviews:
From the Internet to Paper. Findings show that ideologies, especially those associated with religious
beliefs, are used to establish successful trends in motivation, interaction, leadership and experience in
a business context. What are the key concepts and how are they defined. Theorists playing with this
model, including Yeung, Hassibi and Effros also proposed network coding and solved the problem
for multi-user multicast erasure network. It also represents an excellent opportunity to get feedback
from renowned experts in your field. Depending on the length and type of document, you might also
include a literature review or theoretical framework before the methodology. To cite a literature
review in APA style, you need to provide the author's name, the title of the article, and the year of
publication. The exact keywords can be extended to widen your research over other databases and
academic search engines like: Google Scholar Microsoft Academic Science.gov Besides, it is not
advisable to go through every resource word by word. Writing the Literature Review The final step is
to finally write the paper from scratch. State-of-the-Art Review The State-of-the-Art review is
conducted periodically, focusing on the most recent research. As a student, I am excited about the
fact that combination of IT and network has not been completed, since it means great potential for
network information theory. Address the research question or objective stated in the introduction.
This literature review synthesizes key findings from various studies: a. It’s important to note that
these strategies are not mutually exclusive, and a literature review may combine elements of more
than one approach. Inductive reasoning is a method of drawing conclusions by going from the
specific to the general. But all the same I’ll make use of this opportunity to the fullest. So, pay close
attention to the keywords used in the journal articles you read and use those keywords to search for
more articles. You might argue for the relevance of a specific theoretical approach, or combine
various theoretical concepts to create a framework for your research.
Given this, the purpose of a literature review is to: Place each work in the context of its contribution
to understanding the research problem being studied. There is an increasing interest in the visual
aspects of social media. A literature review is important because it: Explains the background of
research on a topic. When it is just a chapter, sources should equal the total number of pages in your
article's body. The exceptions are when you have statements describing events that happened earlier
than the literature you are reviewing or events that are currently occurring; then, you can use the past
perfect or present perfect tenses. To communicate your key findings to those who don’t have time to
read the whole paper. Each of these is its own dependent variable with its own research question. In
many cases, a general topic will simply be too broad to effectively research. For most proofreading
jobs, experience and demonstrated skills are more important than specific qualifications. Writing a
literature review can be challenging because: you need to coordinate many sources and ideas into a
logical argument you may be dealing with language and ideas you haven't fully mastered yet there
are no fixed rules for what to include or how to organise your writing. However, our editors are
language specialists, not academic experts in your field. You could potentially structure your
literature review chapter according to theme, group, variables, chronologically or per concepts in
your field of research. In other words, the planning fallacy refers to inaccurate predictions about the
time we need to finish a task, while procrastination is a deliberate delay due to psychological factors.
Some types of sources are nearly always primary: works of art and literature, raw statistical data,
official documents and records, and personal communications (e.g. letters, interviews ). You can
keep data confidential by using aggregate information in your research report, so that you only refer
to groups of participants rather than individuals. By using the said matrix, the academician
conducting research was able to define the main issues that were explored in relation to elderly
homeless women. The choice of strategy depends on the research question, the nature of the literature
available, and the goals of the review. By combining information from all relevant studies, meta-
analysis can provide more precise estimates of the effects than those derived from the individual
studies included within a review. Thematic: If you have found some recurring central themes that
you will continue working with throughout your piece, you can organize your literature review into
subsections that address different aspects of the topic. Show the reader how scholarship on the topic
has changed over time. The current evidence indicates that medications used to treat osteoporosis are
also effective for treating OA. Our sense of possibility is shaped by the metaphors we choose. A
literature review is a document or section of a document that collects key sources on a topic and
discusses those sources in conversation with each other (also called synthesis ). You might work on it
(alongside other classes) for the entirety of the final year, or for the last six months. In contrast, you
might only need to refer to 5-15 sources at the undergraduate level. The first approach would be to
look level you are at as a researcher. In quota sampling, you first need to divide your population of
interest into subgroups (strata) and estimate their proportions (quota) in the population. Craft a list of
search terms to use to identify likely sources. Open-ended or long-form questions allow respondents
to answer in their own words. The literature review is an important part of any research project
because it allows the writer to look at previous studies on a topic and determine existing gaps in the
literature, as well as what has already been done.
This, in turn, can cause us to misjudge ourselves or others. Appreciate and good reference in guiding
me in my research journey. Each article identified was independently reviewed and included in this
review if it was a human or animal study investigating the effect of osteoporosis medications on OA.
Make sure your research question is not too broad or too narrow. Once you’ve done that, give your
writing to a friend or colleague who is not a subject matter expert and ask them if they understand
the overall discussion. To identify a false cause fallacy, you need to carefully analyse the argument:
When someone claims that one event directly causes another, ask if there is sufficient evidence to
establish a cause-and-effect relationship. Verbs are almost always used along with a noun or pronoun
to describe what the noun or pronoun is doing. Instead, you need to read first and distil the
information, then plan and execute the writing. A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources
on a specific topic. The Scribbr Reference Generator is developed using the open-source Citation
Style Language (CSL) project and Frank Bennett’s citeproc-js. It can be difficult in a saturated field
to find many areas that have not yet been covered, but when you do, it will be much easier to explain
why your topic and approach are essential and original. There are many different types of inductive
reasoning that people use formally or informally. This aids in the development of a theoretical
framework for the current research. Uses more resources to recruit participants, administer sessions,
cover costs, etc. If your research is mainly quantitative, you won’t include many quotes, but if it’s
more qualitative, you may need to quote from the data you collected. A statistic refers to measures
about the sample, while a parameter refers to measures about the population. This identification of
factors and interactions contribute to a wider understanding of the relationship between success and
knowledge transfer and thus allows boundaries and parameters to fortify a knowledge transfer arena
from which to establish metrics. Rule 3: Take Notes While Reading If you read the papers first, and
only afterwards start writing the review, you will need a very good memory to remember who wrote
what, and what your impressions and associations were while reading each single paper. Write the
review Thompson Writing Studio This link opens in a new window Need to write a systematic
review. An in-depth analysis of each review is beyond the scope of this article; rather, the primary
findings are summarized. Your librarian can help you determine the best databases to use for your
topic, assess scope, and formulate a search strategy. In single-stage sampling, you collect data from
every unit within the selected clusters. Pathetic fallacy is a figure of speech, at least in most
contexts, and not a reasoning error. It can summarise texts of up to 1,200 words for free, or up to
6,000 with a premium subscription. You need to follow the below-mentioned steps, to write a
literature review: Outline the purpose behind the literature review Search relevant literature Examine
and assess the relevant resources Discover connections by drawing deep insights from the resources
Structure planning to write a good literature review 1. The acknowledgements are generally included
at the very beginning of your thesis or dissertation, directly after the title page and before the
abstract. For this reason, it is wrong to try to outlaw firearms in the United States today.” Clearly
there is a step missing in this line of reasoning and the conclusion does not follow from the premise,
resulting in a non sequitur fallacy. Additionally, you must spend surplus time assessing the quality
and relevance of resources. There are numerous ways to find relevant literature, but I’ll cover my top
four tactics here. Accuracy: It bases its responses on patterns rather than evidence and is unable to
cite its sources.
Body: The body of the literature review is where you provide a comprehensive analysis of existing
literature, grouping studies based on themes, methodologies, or other relevant criteria. But in general,
it is a relatively brief but thorough exploration of past and current work on a topic. Qualitative versus
quantitative research Empirical versus theoretical scholarship Divide the research by sociological,
historical, or cultural sources Theoretical: In many humanities articles, the literature review is the
foundation for the theoretical framework. They are statements that sound convincing at first but can
be disproven through logical reasoning. A summary is a recap of the important information of the
source, but a synthesis is a re-organization, or a reshuffling, of that information in a way that informs
how you are planning to investigate a research problem. The main difference between this and a true
experiment is that the groups are not randomly assigned. Argumentative Review This form examines
literature selectively in order to support or refute an argument, deeply embedded assumption, or
philosophical problem already established in the literature. Sources for a literature review should be
as current as possible or not older than ten years. While analyzing the sources, you should look to
find out answers to questions like: What question or problem has the author been describing and
debating. On the other hand, content validity assesses how well the test represents all aspects of the
construct. An experimental group, also known as a treatment group, receives the treatment whose
effect researchers wish to study, whereas a control group does not. A literature review is a survey of
scholarly sources on a specific topic. Quantitative observations involve measuring or counting
something and expressing the result in numerical form, while qualitative observations involve
describing something in non-numerical terms, such as its appearance, texture, or color. For this
reason, it’s important to also ask for feedback from people who have experience with college essays
and who know you well. The process of turning abstract concepts into measurable variables and
indicators is called operationalisation. Random sampling enhances the external validity or
generalisability of your results, while random assignment improves the internal validity of your study.
It can make variables appear to be correlated when they are not, or vice versa. Sometimes a
bibliography also contains other sources that you used in your research, but did not cite in the text.
Then, you take a broad scan of your data and search for patterns. But remember that a literature
review is an ongoing process, and it may be necessary to revisit and update it as your research
progresses. What challenges does this research paper pose to the existing theory What are the
possible contributions or benefits it adds to the subject domain. In other words, a post hoc fallacy
occurs when there is a lack of a cause-and-effect relationship, while a non sequitur fallacy occurs
when there is a lack of logical connection. Very comprehensive and eye opener for me as beginner in
postgraduate study. Periodically, UT Libraries runs a workshop covering the basics and library
support for literature reviews. The goals and objectives of the research question determine what goes
inside these three sections. When creating a literature review, a lot of writers just sum up the material
collected from sources they have browsed, and this is a huge mistake. Ideally, the literature review
should take up 15%-40% of the total length of your manuscript. A well-written literature review is
an art form in and of itself. A literature review is meant to help your readers understand the
relevance of your research question and where it fits within the existing body of knowledge.
Templates for Writing Thesis Statements This template provides a two-step guide for writing thesis
statements.
If some aspects are missing or irrelevant parts are included, the test has low content validity.
Literature reviews are designed to provide an overview of sources you have used in researching a
particular topic and to demonstrate to your readers how your research fits within existing scholarship
about the topic. You Might Also Like: 16 Comments Thanks for this review. To know what literature
you will need to review, you need to understand precisely what you are being asked to do in your
paper. Like definite articles, they are a type of determiner. Neither the layout of the building nor the
activities available seem to make much difference. I think Shannon’s experience with real
communication systems during World War. Reference the source with an in-text citation and a full
reference so your reader can easily find the original text. Keep reading to enter the exciting world of
literature reviews. Some scientists may be overly enthusiastic about what they have published, and
thus risk giving too much importance to their own findings in the review. The purpose is to place
research in a historical context to show familiarity with state-of-the-art developments and identify
future research's likely directions. There are a number of ways you can deal with slippery slope
arguments especially when you suspect these are fallacious: Slippery slope arguments take advantage
of the gray area between an initial action or decision and the possible next steps that might lead to
the undesirable outcome. In this article, we will walk you through the important processes for writing
an excellent literature review. Academic dishonesty can be intentional or unintentional, ranging from
something as simple as claiming to have read something you didn’t to copying your neighbour’s
answers on an exam. Based on your reading and notes, you can look for: Trends and patterns (in
theory, method or results): do certain approaches become more or less popular over time. Reading
combined with critical analysis can help to refine a topic and frame research questions. You will
receive the sample edit within 24 hours after placing your order. It serves two main purposes: To help
potential readers determine the relevance of your paper for their own research. You can organise the
questions logically, with a clear progression from simple to complex, or randomly between
respondents. You should not include any citations in this section, because you will do that later in the
paper. There are a number of different situations where you might write a literature review, each
with slightly different expectations; different disciplines, too, have field-specific expectations for
what a literature review is and does. As a publication, a lit review usually is meant to help make
other scholars’ lives easier by collecting and summarizing, synthesizing, and analyzing existing
research on a topic. A literature review may offer new interpretations, theoretical approaches, or
other ideas; if it is part of a research proposal or report it should demonstrate the relationship of the
proposed or reported research to others' work; but whatever else it does, it must provide a critical
overview of the current state of research efforts. With the increased knowledge of and experience in
the topic as you proceed, your understanding of the topic will increase. In these instances, use an
example that demonstrates the problem with slippery slope arguments in general (e.g., by using
statements to reach a conclusion that is not necessarily relevant to the initial statement). It involves
more in-depth research and interpretation of sources and data. Give your interpretation of how and
why certain developments occurred (as mentioned previously, this may not be appropriate in your
discipline — check with a teacher or mentor if you’re unsure). Whether you’re publishing a blog,
submitting a research paper, or even just writing an important email, there are a few techniques you
can use to make sure it’s error-free: Take a break: Set your work aside for at least a few hours so that
you can look at it with fresh eyes. Sunk cost fallacy is the tendency to stick with a decision or a plan
even when it’s failing. Make certain that all of the citations and references are correct and that you
are referencing in the appropriate style for your discipline.