‫ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ‪16‬‬ ‫ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻄﻴﺔ‬

‫ﺿﻴﺎء ﻧﻌﻴﻢ ﺃﺣﻤﺪ‬

‫ﻲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻄﻲ‬ ‫ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻄﻮﻳﺮ‬

‫ﺍﻟﺨﻼﺻﺔ‪:‬‬

‫ﻳﻘﻊ ﺣﻘﻞ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻴﺲ ﺍﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺪﻳﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺼﺮﺓ ﻭﺣﻘﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﻣﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺎﻟﻲ ‪ ،‬ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻢ ﺣﻔﺮ )‪ (22‬ﺑﺌﺮﺍ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺤﻘﻞ ‪،‬‬
‫ﻣﻨﻬﺎ )‪ (6‬ﺁﺑﺎﺭ ﻣﻨﺘﺠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻜﻤﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﺑﻴﺮ ‪ ،‬ﻭ)‪ (7‬ﺁﺑﺎﺭ ﻣﻨﺘﺠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻜﻤﻦ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﺿﺮ ‪.‬‬
‫ﺃﻥ ﺗﻘﺎﺩﻡ ﺍﻷﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﻟﻼﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻄﻴﺔ ﻓﻲ ﻓﻲ ﺣﻘﻞ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻴﺲ ﺃﺩﻯ ﺍﻟﻰ ﺍﻧﺨﻔﺎﺽ ﺿﻐﻮﻁﻬﺎ ﻭﺗﻮﻗﻒ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ‬
‫ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﺮﺍﻗﺒﺔ ﻣﺴﺘﻤﺮﺓ ﻟﻤﺘﻐﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﻟﻬﺬﻩ ﺍﻻﺑﺎﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺿﻐﻮﻁ ﺳﻄﺤﻴﺔ ﻭﻗﻌﺮﻳﺔ ﻭﻓﺘﺤﺎﺕ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻖ ‪....‬ﺍﻟﺦ‬
‫ﻭﺑﻔﺘﺮﺍﺕ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﺭﺑﺔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻣﻤﺎ ﺍﺩﻯ ﺍﻟﻰ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﺗﺨﻔﻴﺾ ﺿﻐﻂ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻝ ﻟﻠﻤﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﻟﻰ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻀﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﻤﺮﺍﺭ‬
‫ﺍﻷﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺑﺎﺭ ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻥ ﺗﺨﻔﻴﺾ ﺍﻟﻀﻐﻂ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﻐﻴﻠﻲ ﻟﻀﻔﺎﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻝ ﻓﻲ ﻣﺤﻄﺔ ﻋﺰﻝ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺯ ﺃﺩﻯ ﺍﻟﻰ ﺍﻧﺨﻔﺎﺽ ﺿﻐﻂ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﻤﺼﺎﺣﺐ ﻟﻠﻨﻔﻂ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺘﺞ ﻣﻤﺎ ﺍﺩﻯ ﺑﺪﻭﺭﻩ ﺍﻟﻰ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻤﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﻤﺼﺎﺣﺐ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻏﻲ ﻗﺎﺩﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻰ‬
‫ﻭﺣﺪﺓ ﺍﻝ ‪ NGL‬ﺑﻀﻐﻂ ﻳﺴﻤﺢ ﺑﺄﺳﺘﺜﻤﺎﺭ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺯ )ﻳﺠﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺿﻐﻂ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺯ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻭﺻﻮﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﻰ ﻭﺣﺪﺓ ﺍﻝ ‪NGL‬‬
‫ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻀﻐﻂ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﻐﻴﻠﻲ ﻟﻬﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺎﻟﻎ ‪ 400‬ﺑﺎﻭﻧﺪ‪/‬ﺍﻧﺞ‪ (2‬ﺍﺧﺬﻳﻦ ﺑﻨﻈﺮ ﺍﻷﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻓﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺟﺰء ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻀﻐﻂ‬
‫ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺍﻷﺣﺘﻜﺎﻙ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻻﻧﺎﺑﻴﺐ ﺍﻷﻧﺘﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﺃﺛﻨﺎء ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻂ ﻣﻦ ﺿﻔﺎﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻝ ﻓﻲ ﺣﻘﻞ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻴﺲ ﺍﻟﻰ ﻭﺣﺪﺓ ﺍﻝ ‪NGL‬‬
‫ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺮﻣﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻭﻫﻲ ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺔ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺼﻴﺮﺓ ﻭﻣﻤﺎ ﺳﺎﻋﺪ ﻓﻲ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﻫﻮ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺗﻮﻓﺮ ﻛﺎﺑﺴﺎﺕ ﻟﺮﻓﻊ ﺿﻐﻂ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﻤﺼﺎﺣﺐ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻋﺰﻟﻪ ﻓﻲ ﻣﺤﻄﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻝ ‪.‬‬
‫ﻓﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺗﻢ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺍﻟﻀﻐﻂ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﻐﻴﻠﻲ ﻟﻌﺎﺯﻻﺕ ﺿﻔﺎﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻝ ﻓﻲ ﻣﺤﻄﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻝ ﻋﻦ ﻁﺮﻳﻖ ﺃﻋﺎﺩﺓ‬
‫ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﻐﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻷﻧﺘﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﻟﻼﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻄﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺘﺠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺿﻐﻮﻁ ﺳﻄﺤﻴﺔ ﻭﻓﺘﺤﺎﺕ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻖ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺮﺍﻣﺠﻴﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻬﻴﺪﺭﻭﻟﻴﻜﻴﺔ ) ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﺠﻲ‪ Prosper‬ﻭ ‪ GAP‬ﻟﻠﺠﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻮﺩﻱ ﻭﺍﻷﻓﻘﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﻟﻲ ( ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺳﻴﺆﺩﻱ ﺑﺪﻭﺭﻩ ﺍﻟﻰ‬
‫ﺭﻓﻊ ﺿﻐﻂ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺘﺞ ﺑﻤﺎ ﻳﺴﻤﺢ ﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﻰ ﻭﺣﺪﺓ ﺍﻝ ‪ NGL‬ﺑﻀﻐﻂ ﻻ ﻳﻘﻞ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻀﻐﻂ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﻐﻴﻠﻲ‬
‫ﻟﻬﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺪﺓ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺗﻢ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺻﻞ ﺍﻟﻰ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺿﻐﻂ ﺍﻟﻤﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻻﻭﻟﻰ ﻓﻲ ﻣﺤﻄﺔ ﻋﺰﻝ ﻏﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻴﺲ ﺍﻟﻰ )‪ (36‬ﻛﻐﻢ‪/‬ﺳﻢ‪ 2‬ﻭﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ‬
‫ﻓﺘﺤﺎﺕ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻖ ﺍﻵﺑﺎﺭ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻣﺒﻴﻦ ﻓﻲ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﻭﺍﻋﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻤﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﻤﺼﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺘﺞ ﻣﻊ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻓﻲ ﻣﻌﺪﻝ ﺃﻧﺘﺎﺝ‬
‫ﺍ ﻟﻨﻔﻂ ﻓﻲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻧﺨﻔﺎﺽ ﻣﻌﺪﻝ ﺍﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻂ ﺑﻤﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﻗﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﺫﺍ ﺭﻏﺒﻨﺎ ﺑﺮﻓﻊ ﺿﻐﻂ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻝ ﺍﻟﻰ )‪(42‬ﻛﻐﻢ‪/‬ﺳﻢ‪ 2‬ﻣﻊ‬
‫ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻤﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﻤﺼﺎﺣﺐ‪.‬‬

‫‪A34‬‬
 ‫ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ‪16‬‬ ‫ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻄﻴﺔ‬

‫ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﻣﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﺑﺪﺃ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺤﻘﻞ ﻋﺎﻡ ‪ 1976‬ﺑﻠﻎ ﻣﻌﺪﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﺣﻮﺍﻟﻲ )‪ (84.4‬ﺍﻟﻒ ﺏ‪/‬ﻱ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺷﻬﺮ ﺗﻤﻮﺯ‪ ، 2016/‬ﻋﻠﻤﺎ ﺍﻥ‬
‫ﻣﺤﻄﺔ ﻋﺰﻝ ﻏﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻴﺲ ﺗﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ )‪ (3‬ﺿﻔﺎﻑ ﻟﻠﻌﺰﻝ ‪ ،‬ﻭﺗﻌﻤﻞ ﻋﺎﺯﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻻﻭﻟﻰ ﺑﻀﻐﻂ ﺗﺸﻐﻴﻠﻲ ﻳﺒﻠﻎ )‪(28‬‬
‫ﻛﻐﻢ‪/‬ﺳﻢ‪. 2‬‬
‫ﻭﻧﻈﺮﺍ ﻟﺘﻘﺎﺩﻡ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺍﻟﺤﻘﻞ ﻭﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﺘﺎﺑﻌﺔ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ﻭﻣﺴﺘﻤﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻧﺎﺣﻴﺔ ﻣﺘﺎﺑﻌﺔ ﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻻﺑﺎﺭ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺤﻘﻞ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻜﻢ‬
‫ﺑﺎﻟﻤﺘﻐﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺗﺆﺛﺮ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﻣﺒﺎﺷﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻌﺪﻻﺕ ﺍﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻻﺑﺎﺭ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻅﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻝ ﻓﻲ ﻣﺤﻄﺔ ﻋﺰﻝ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺯ ﻭﺧﺎﺻﺔ‬
‫ﻓﺘﺤﺎﺕ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻖ ﺍﻻﺑﺎﺭ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻼﺯﻡ ﻣﺘﺎﺑﻌﺘﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﻤﺮﺍﺭ ﻭﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﻫﺎ ﺑﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﻭﻅﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﻟﺒﺌﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺍﻟﻀﻐﻮﻁ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺴﻄﺤﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺠﺮﻳﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺎﻛﻨﺔ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻗﺎﻁﻊ ﺍﻟﻤﺎء ﻟﻠﻨﻔﻂ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺘﺞ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺿﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﻤﺮﺍﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻻﺑﺎﺭ‬
‫ﻭﻋﺪﻡ ﺣﺼﻮﻝ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺛﻨﺎﺋﻲ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺭ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﻜﻤﻦ ﻣﻤﺎ ﺳﻴﺆﺩﻱ ﺍﻟﻰ ﺗﻮﻗﻒ ﺍﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻂ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻻﺑﺎﺭ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻻﺟﻞ ﺿﻤﺎﻥ ﻛﻔﺎءﺓ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺎﺑﻌﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺗﺒﺮﺯ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﺟﺔ ﺍﻟﻰ ﺍﺟﺮﺍء ﻗﻴﺎﺳﺎﺕ ﻭﻓﺤﻮﺻﺎﺕ ﻣﺴﺘﻤﺮﺓ ﻟﻬﺬﻩ ﺍﻻﺑﺎﺭ ﻭﺑﺸﻜﻞ‬
‫ﺩﻭﺭﻱ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻥ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻣﺘﺎﺑﻌﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻻﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﺩﻯ ﺍﻟﻰ ﺃﻧﺨﻔﺎﺽ ﺿﻐﻮﻁﻬﺎ ﻭﺑﺎﻟﺘﺎﻟﻲ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﺗﺨﻔﻴﺾ ﺿﻐﻮﻁ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻝ ﻓﻲ ﻣﺤﻄﺔ ﻋﺰﻝ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺯ‬
‫ﻟﻀﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﻤﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻂ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻻﺑﺎﺭ ﻭﻟﻮ ﺑﻤﻌﺪﻻﺕ ﺍﻗﻞ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺑﺪﻭﺭﻩ ﺳﻴﺆﺩﻱ ﺍﻟﻰ ﺃﻧﺨﻔﺎﺽ ﺿﻐﻂ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﻤﺼﺎﺣﺐ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺘﺞ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ‪.‬‬
‫ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺤﺎﻓﻈ ﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻻﺑﺎﺭ ﺑﻬﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺘﺒﺮ ﺍﻟﺤﻞ ﺍﻷﻣﺜﻞ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻰ ﺍﻻﺑﺎﺭ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﻭﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ‬
‫ﻅﺮﻭﻓﻬﺎ ﺍﻷﻧﺘﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﻷﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻬﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺳﺘﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺍ ﺗﻠﻮ ﺍﻻﺧﺮ ‪.‬‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﻭﻧﻈﺮﺍ ﻟﻌﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻛﺎﺑﺴﺔ ﻟﻠﻐﺎﺯ ﻟﻠﻤﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻻﻭﻟﻰ ﻓﻲ ﻣﺤﻄﺔ ﻋﺰﻝ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺯ ﺗﻌﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺍﻟﻀﻐﻂ ﻣﻦ )‪ (28‬ﻛﻐﻢ‪/‬ﺳﻢ ﺍﻟﻰ‬
‫)‪ (42-36‬ﻛﻐﻢ‪/‬ﺳﻢ‪ ، 2‬ﻭﻟﻠﺮﻏﺒﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻤﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﻤﺼﺎﺣﺐ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻻ ﻳﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﻷﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﺓ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺣﺎﻟﻴﺎ ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺑﺤﺜﻨﺎ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺭﻓﻊ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻀﻐﻂ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﻐﻴﻠﻲ ﻟﻠﻤﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻻﻭﻟﻰ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﺤﻄﺔ ﺍﻟﻰ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻀﻐﻮﻁ ﻭﺍﺳﺘﻐﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺯ ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺗﺄﺛﻴﺮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻌﺪﻝ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﻘﻖ ﻟﻠﻨﻔﻂ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺎﺯ‪.‬‬
‫ﺗﻢ ﺃﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺮﻣﺠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻬﻴﺪﺭﻭﻟﻴﻜﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻮﺩﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﻓﻘﻴﺔ ) ‪ Prosper‬ﻭ ‪ ( GAP‬ﻓﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺃﺧﺘﺼﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ‬
‫ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻋﺪﺩ ﺧﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺘﺮﺡ ﻟﻠﻈﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﻷﻧﺘﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﻟﻬﺬﻩ ﺍﻻﺑﺎﺭ ﻟﻠﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻰ ﺃﻓﻀﻞ ﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻌﻬﺎ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻬﺪﻑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﻭﺿﻤﻦ ﺍﻟﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻤﻮﺣﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻧﺎﺣﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻈﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﻟﻤﻜﻤﻨﻴﺔ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﻮﺍﺻﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻂ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺘﺞ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﻰ‬
‫ﻁﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺍﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻻﺑﺎﺭ ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺠﺪﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﻤﻼﺣﻈﺔ ‪ ،‬ﺍﻥ ﺩﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﺤﺼﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ‪ ،‬ﺗﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﺑﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺩﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺤﻘﻠﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺎﺳﺔ ﻛﻤﻌﺪﻻﺕ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺎﺝ ‪ ،‬ﻗﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻀﻐﻮﻁ ﺍﻟﻤﻜﻤﻨﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻄﺤﻴﺔ ‪ ،‬ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﻓﺘﺤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺨﻮﺍﻧﻖ ﻭﻗﻴﺎﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﺬﺟﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻄﺤﻴﺔ ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﺑﺨﻼﻑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﻗﺪ ﻻﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺔ ‪ ،‬ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻌﻴﺪﺓ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺑﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﻛﺒﻴﺮﺓ ‪.‬‬

‫‪A35‬‬
 ‫ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ‪16‬‬ ‫ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻄﻴﺔ‬

‫ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﺿﻐﻂ ﺍﻟﻤﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﻟﻰ ﺑﺎﻷﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﻷﻧﺘﺎﺟﻴﺔ ‪:‬‬

‫‪ -1‬ﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﻀﻐﻂ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﻐﻴﻠﻲ ﻟﻠﻌﺎﺯﻟﺔ ﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺿﻐﻂ ﺍﻟﺠﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻓﻲ ﺃﻧﺎﺑﻴﺐ ﺍﻷﻧﺘﺎﺝ ‪ Tubing‬ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻨﻔﻂ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺨﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻭﺍﻥ ﺍﻱ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻀﻐﻂ ﻳﺆﺩﻱ ﺍﻟﻰ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﻓﻲ ﻛﺜﺎﻓﺔ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺯ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻔﻂ ‪ ،‬ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺴﺮﻉ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻤﻮﺡ ﺑﻬﺎ ﻭﻓﻲ ﺣﺠﻢ ﺍﻟﺠﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻠﻲ ‪.‬‬

‫ﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﺛﻴﺮ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻓﻲ ﻓﻲ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻀﻐﻂ ﻫﻮ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻓﻲ ﺳﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺯﻟﺔ ﻟﻠﻐﺎﺯ ‪ /‬ﺍﻟﻤﺼﺪﺭ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪. (1‬‬
‫‪ -2‬ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﺎﺋﻲ ﻟﻤﻨﻈﻮﻣﺔ ﺍﻷﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﻻ ﻳﻤﻜﻦ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﺩﺍﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻜﻤﻦ ﻭﻣﻨﻈﻮﻣﺔ ﻧﻘﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻂ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺘﺞ ﺍﻟﻰ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺨﺰﺍﻧﺎﺕ‪ .‬ﺍﻥ ﻛﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻂ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺧﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻰ ﺟﻮﻑ ﺍﻟﺒﺌﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﻜﻤﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻄﻲ ﺗﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺒﻮﻁ ﺍﻟﻀﻐﻂ ﻓﻲ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﻣﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻞ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺎﻥ ﻫﺒﻮﻁ ﺍﻟﻀﻐﻂ ﻓﻲ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻞ ﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻂ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺗﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﻈﻮﻣﺔ‬
‫ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻳﺠﺐ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﻭﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﻈﻮﻣﺔ ﺍﻷﻧﺘﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﻛﻮﺣﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ‪.‬ﻻ ﻳﻤﻜﻦ ﺗﺤﺪﻳﺪ ﺃﺩﺍﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺘﺠﺔ ﺑﻤﺤﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﻗﻴﺎﺳﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺃﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺍﻟﻤﺆﺛﺮﺓ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﻈﻮﻣﺔ ﺍﻷﻧﺘﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﻭﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﻣﻨﻌﺰﻝ ﻋﻦ ﺑﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺍﻣﻞ ‪.‬ﺃﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ‬
‫ﺑﺎﻷﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺗﺤﺪﻳﺪ ﺗﺄﺛﻴﺮ ﻛﻞ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﻣﻨﻔﺼﻞ ﻳﻤﻜﻦ ﺃﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻈﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﻟﻤﺜﻠﻰ ﻟﺘﺸﻐﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﻈﻮﻣﺔ ﺍﻷﻧﺘﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ‬
‫ﻳﻀﻤﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﺮﺩﻭﺩﺍﻷﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﻴﺮ‪ .‬ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﺗﺒﻴﻦ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﻴﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﻧﺘﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﻟﻼﺑﺎﺭ ﻭﺑﺎﻟﺘﺎﻟﻲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻤﺮﺩﻭﺩ ﺍﻷﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺒﺎﻟﻎ ﻗﺪ ﺗﻢ ﺧﺴﺎﺭﺗﻬﺎ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺍﻟﻤﺤﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﻴﺮﺓ ﻟﻼﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﻋﻦ ﻁﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﺃﻧﺎﺑﻴﺐ ﺃﻧﺘﺎﺝ‬
‫ﺻﻐﻴﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﺮ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﺳﺘﻐﻼﻝ ﺃﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻜﻤﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻄﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺎﺣﺔ ﻟﻸﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻻﻣﻦ ﺑﺤﻴﺚ ﻳﻤﻜﻦ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﻗﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻷﻧﺘﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﺃﻧﺎﺑﻴﺐ ﺃﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻛﺒﺮ ﻗﻄﺮﺍ‪.‬ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﻲ ﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﺃﻧﺎﺑﻴﺐ ﺃﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺃﻗﻄﺎﺭ ﻛﺒﻴﺮﺓ ﺟﺪﺍ ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﺳﻴﺆﺩﻱ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻰ ﺍﻧﺨﻔﺎﺽ ﺍﻷﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﻭﺭﺑﻤﺎ ﺗﻮﻗﻔﻪ ﻟﻌﺪﻡ ﺗﻄﺎﺑﻖ ﺃﻗﻄﺎﺭ ﺍﻧﺎﺑﻴﺐ ﺍﻷﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﺨﺪﻣﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﻜﻤﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻄﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺎﺣﺔ‬
‫ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻂ ﻭﻅﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﻟﺒﺌﺮ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺘﺞ ﻭﻣﻨﻈﻮﻣﺔ ﺍﻷﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﻐﻴﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺑﺪﻭﺭﻩ ﺳﻴﺆﺩﻱ ﺍﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﺟﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺒﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻰ‬
‫ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﻭﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻷﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻮﻳﺔ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻟﻤﻀﺨﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻁﺴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺮﻓﻊ ﺑﺎﻟﻐﺎﺯ‪.‬ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻳﺠﺐ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻈﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﻷﻧﺘﺎﺟﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻤﺜﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺗﻀﻤﻦ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﻓﻀﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺮﺩﻭﺩ ﺍﻷﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺴﺐ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﻜﻤﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻄﻲ ﻭﻧﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻂ‬
‫ﻭﻅﺮﻭﻑ ﺃﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻷﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺘﺠﺔ ﻭﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﻧﻘﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻂ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺘﺞ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺿﻐﻮﻁ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻝ ﻓﻲ ﻣﺤﻄﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻝ ﻛﻮﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﺘﻜﺎﻣﻠﺔ ‪/‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻤﺼﺪﺭ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪. (2‬‬

‫‪A36‬‬
 ‫ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ‪16‬‬ ‫ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻄﻴﺔ‬

‫ﺭﺳﻢ ﺗﺨﻄﻴﻄﻲ ﻳﻮﺿﺢ ﻣﺴﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻂ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﻡ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻌﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﺌﺮ ﺍﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺨﺰﺍﺕ ﻣﺮﻭﺭﺍ ﺑﻤﺤﻄﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﻀﻐﻮﻁ ﺍﻟﻤﺆﺛﺮﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻂ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻛﺎﻓﺔ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺎﺭ‬

‫ﻳﺘﻀﺢ ﺟﻠﻴﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﺼﺎﺩﺭ ﺍﻟﻤﺬﻛﻮﺭﺓ ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﻭﺛﻴﻘﺔ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺿﻐﻮﻁ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻝ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺯﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻄﻴﺔ ﻓﻲ ﻣﺤﻄﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻝ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﻀﻐﻮﻁ ﺍﻟﺠﺮﻳﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻌﺮﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻄﺤﻴﺔ ﻟﻼﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻁﻮﻝ ﻭﺃﻗﻄﺎﺭ ﺃﻧﺎﺑﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻞ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻻﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﻭﻣﺤﻄﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻝ ‪.‬‬

‫ﻁﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ‪:‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﺗﻢ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﺞ ﺣﺴﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺠﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻮﺩﻱ )‪ (PROSPER‬ﻟﻤﻮﺍﺋﻤﺔ ﻣﻌﺪﻻﺕ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺎﺳﺔ ﻣﻊ ﻣﺎﻳﺤﺴﺒﻪ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﺮﻧﺎﻣﺞ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺍﻟﻀﻐﻮﻁ ﺍﻟﻘﻌﺮﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻄﺤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺎﺳﺔ ‪.‬‬

‫‪ -2‬ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺮﻧﺎﻣﺞ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻫﺰ )‪ (GAP‬ﻟﺤﺴﺎﺏ ﺍﺩﺍﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺠﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻻﻓﻘﻲ ﻭﻣﻮﺍﺋﻤﺘﻬﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻀﻐﻮﻁ ﺍﻟﺴﻄﺤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺎﺳﺔ ﻭﻓﺘﺤﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺨﻮﺍﻧﻖ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺍﻟﻀﻐﻂ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﻐﻴﻠﻲ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﻟﻲ )‪ (28‬ﻛﻐﻢ‪/‬ﺳﻢ‪. 2‬‬

‫‪ -3‬ﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﻣﻌﺪﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﻘﻖ ﻭﻛﻤﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﻤﺼﺎﺣﺒﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺿﻐﻂ ﺍﻟﻤﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻻﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﻰ )‪(42-36‬‬
‫ﻛﻐﻢ‪/‬ﺳﻢ‪. 2‬‬

‫‪ -4‬ﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﺍﻓﻀﻞ ﻣﻌﺪﻝ ﻟﻼﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﻓﻲ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻗﻴﺎﺳﺎﺕ ﻣﺜﻠﻰ )‪ (Optimum‬ﻟﻔﺘﺤﺎﺕ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻖ ﺍﻵﺑﺎﺭ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻗﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻀﻐﻮﻁ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻤﻔﺘﺮﺿﺔ ﻟﻀﻐﻂ ﺍﻟﻤﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻻﻭﻟﻰ ‪.‬‬

‫‪A37‬‬
 ‫ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ‪16‬‬ ‫ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻄﻴﺔ‬

‫ﺍﻟﻤﺪﺧﻼﺕ‪:‬‬
‫ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺪﺧﻠﺔ ﻟﻠﺒﺮﻣﺠﻴﺎﺕ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ ‪:‬‬
‫ﺑﻴﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺍﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻵﺑﺎﺭ ‪ .‬ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (A1‬ﻣﻠﺤﻖ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪. (1‬‬ ‫‪-‬‬

‫ﺑﻴﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺨﻮﺍﺹ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﺰﻳﺎﻭﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺮﻣﻮﺩﻳﻨﺎﻣﻴﻜﻴﺔ ‪ .‬ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (A2‬ﻣﻠﺤﻖ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪. (2‬‬ ‫‪-‬‬

‫ﻣﻌﺪﻻﺕ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺎﺝ ‪ ،‬ﻗﻴﺎﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻀﻐﻮﻁ ﺍﻟﺴﻄﺤﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻌﺮﻳﺔ ‪ ،‬ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﻓﺘﺤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺨﻮﺍﻧﻖ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻤﺬﺟﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻄﺤﻴﺔ ‪ .‬ﺟﺪﻭﻝ‬ ‫‪-‬‬
‫ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (A3‬ﻣﻠﺤﻖ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪. (3‬‬

‫ﺑﻴﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻰ ﻣﺤﻄﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻝ ‪ .‬ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (A4‬ﻣﻠﺤﻖ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪. (4‬‬ ‫‪-‬‬

‫ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﺗﻢ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺤﻘﻠﻴﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺠﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (A1‬ﻣﻠﺤﻖ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ ، (1‬ﺍﻟﺠﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (A2‬ﻣﻠﺤﻖ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (2‬ﻭﺍﻟﺠﺪﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﺠﺪﻭﻝ‬
‫ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (A3‬ﻣﻠﺤﻖ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪:(3‬‬
‫)‪ (18‬ﺍﻟﻒ ﺏ‪/‬ﻱ ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﻦ‬ ‫‪ -1‬ﺍﻣﻜﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﺋﻤﺔ ﻣﻌﺪﻻﺕ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺎﺳﺔ ﻟﻶﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺘﺠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻜﻤﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﺑﻴﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺎﻟﻐﺔ ﺣﻮﺍﻟﻲ‬
‫ﺍﻵﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺘﺠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻜﻤﻦ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺎﻟﻐﺔ )‪ (29‬ﺍﻟﻒ ﺏ‪/‬ﻱ ‪ ،‬ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﺞ ﺣﺴﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺠﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻮﺩﻱ‬
‫)‪ (PROSPER‬ﻭﺍﻻﺷﻜﺎﻝ )‪ (13-1‬ﺗﺒﻴﻦ ﺧﻼﺻﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ‪.‬‬

‫‪ -2‬ﺍﺩﺧﻠﺖ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻰ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﺞ ﺣﺴﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺠﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻻﻓﻘﻲ )‪ (GAP‬ﻵﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻤﻜﻤﻨﻴﻦ ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺍﻣﻜﻦ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﺍﻟﻤﻮﺍﺋﻤﺔ ﻟﻤﻌﺪﻻﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺎﺳﺔ ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﻀﻐﻮﻁ ﺍﻟﺴﻄﺤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺤﻘﻠﻴﺔ ﻟﺮﺅﻭﺱ ﺍﻵﺑﺎﺭ ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍء ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺪﻳﻼﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﺘﺤﺎﺕ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻖ‬
‫ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻵﺑﺎﺭ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻌﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺻﻴﺎﻧﺔ ﺩﻭﺭﻳﺔ ﻛﻔﻮءﺓ ﻭﻣﺴﺘﻤﺮﺓ ﻟﻬﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺨﻮﺍﻧﻖ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﻳﻀﻤﻦ ﺩﻗﺘﻬﺎ ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﻗﺔ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﻘﻘﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﻜﻤﻨﻴﻦ ﺣﻮﺍﻟﻲ )‪ (47‬ﺍﻟﻒ ﺏ‪/‬ﻱ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺿﻐﻂ ﺍﻟﻤﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻻﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﻟﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺎﻟﻎ )‪ (28‬ﻛﻐﻢ‪/‬ﺳﻢ‬
‫ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺎﺳﺔ ﻟﻤﺤﻄﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻝ ﻭﻛﻤﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺠﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪: (1‬‬

‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺿﻐﻂ ﺍﻟﻤﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻻﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﻟﻲ )‪ (28‬ﻛﻐﻢ‪/‬ﺳﻢ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﺌﺮ‬ ‫ﺭﻗﻢ‬
‫ﻣﻌﺪﻝ ﺍﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻂ ﻣﻌﺪﻝ ﺍﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺯ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻤﻜﻤﻦ‬
‫ﻓﺘﺤﺔ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﻧﻖ‬ ‫ﻟﺤﻴﺲ‪/‬‬
‫ﻣﻖ ﻣﻖ‪/‬ﻱ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻒ ﺏ‪/‬ﻱ‬
‫‪90/64‬‬ ‫‪2,2‬‬ ‫‪3,4‬‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺰﺑﻴﺮ‬ ‫‪1‬‬
‫‪36/64‬‬ ‫‪2,2‬‬ ‫‪3,4‬‬ ‫‪5‬‬
‫‪70/64‬‬ ‫‪2,8‬‬ ‫‪4,3‬‬ ‫‪7‬‬
‫‪60/64‬‬ ‫‪1,6‬‬ ‫‪2,6‬‬ ‫‪11‬‬
‫‪64/64‬‬ ‫‪2,8‬‬ ‫‪4,3‬‬ ‫‪17‬‬
‫‪-‬‬ ‫‪11,7‬‬ ‫‪18,1‬‬ ‫ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﻣﻜﻤﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﺑﻴﺮ‬

‫‪A38‬‬
 ‫ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ‪16‬‬ ‫ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻄﻴﺔ‬

‫‪80/64‬‬ ‫‪2,7‬‬ ‫‪4,2‬‬ ‫ﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ‬ ‫‪2‬‬

‫‪55/64‬‬ ‫‪1,7‬‬ ‫‪2,6‬‬ ‫‪4‬‬
‫‪43/64‬‬ ‫‪2,8‬‬ ‫‪4,3‬‬ ‫‪8‬‬
‫‪95/64‬‬ ‫‪1,6‬‬ ‫‪2,6‬‬ ‫‪10‬‬
‫‪62/64‬‬ ‫‪2,7‬‬ ‫‪4,3‬‬ ‫‪13‬‬
‫‪64/64‬‬ ‫‪2,8‬‬ ‫‪4,3‬‬ ‫‪15‬‬
‫‪77/64‬‬ ‫‪2,2‬‬ ‫‪3,5‬‬ ‫‪16‬‬
‫‪70/64‬‬ ‫‪2,2‬‬ ‫‪3,5‬‬ ‫‪20‬‬
‫‪-‬‬ ‫‪18,8‬‬ ‫‪29,3‬‬ ‫ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﻣﻜﻤﻦ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ‬
‫‪-‬‬ ‫‪30,5‬‬ ‫‪47,4‬‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻤﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻲ ﻟﻠﺤﻘﻞ‬

‫ﺍﻟﺠﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (1‬ﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻻﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﻻﺻﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻤﻮﺍﺋﻤﺔ ﻭﻳﺘﻀﺢ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻌﺪﻻﺕ ﺍﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻂ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺎﺯ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻷﺻﻠﻴﺔ‬

‫ﻳﺘﻀﺢ ﺟﻠﻴﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺠﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (1‬ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﻣﻌﺪﻻﺕ ﺃﻷﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺎﺳﺔ ﻓﻌﻠﻴﺎ ﻟﻤﺤﻄﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻝ ﻭﻧﻈﺮﺍ ﻟﺘﺤﻘﻖ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻤﻮﺍﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺠﻴﺪﺓ ﻟﻤﻮﺩﻳﻼﺕ ﺍﻻﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻤﺤﻀﺮﺓ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﺞ ‪ Prosper‬ﻭﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻮﺿﺢ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻷﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻤﻠﺤﻘﺔ )‪ (13-1‬ﻓﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﻌﻄﻲ ﻣﺼﺪﺍﻗﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻨﻈﻮﻣﺔ ﺍﻷﻧﺘﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻤﺼﻤﻤﺔ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﺠﻲ ‪Prosper‬‬
‫ﻟﻠﺠﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺟﻮﻑ ﺍﻟﺒﺌﺮ ﻭﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﺞ ‪ GAP‬ﻟﻠﺠﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﻓﻘﻲ ) ﻣﻦ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﺒﺌﺮ ﻭﺧﻼﻝ ﺃﻧﺎﺑﻴﺐ ﻧﻘﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻂ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺘﺞ ﺍﻟﻰ‬
‫ﻣﺤﻄﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻝ(‪.‬‬
‫‪ -3‬ﺍﻋﻴﺪﺕ ﺣﺴﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺠﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻻﻓﻘﻲ ﻣﺮﺓ ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺔ ‪ ،‬ﻵﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻤﻜﻤﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻟﻀﻐﻂ ﻋﺎﺯﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻻﻭﻟﻰ )‪(36‬‬
‫ﻛﻐﻢ‪/‬ﺳﻢ‪ 2‬ﻛﺤﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻭﻟﻰ ‪ ،‬ﻭ)‪ (42‬ﻛﻐﻢ‪/‬ﺳﻢ‪ 2‬ﻛﺤﺎﻟﺔ ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﻓﺘﺤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺨﻮﺍﻧﻖ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺬﻛﻮﺭﺓ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺠﺪﻭﻝ ﺍﻋﻼﻩ‬
‫ﻭﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ ‪ /‬ﺍﻟﺠﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪: (2‬‬

‫)‪(42‬‬ ‫)‪ (36‬ﺿﻐﻂ ﺍﻟﻤﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻻﻭﻟﻰ‬ ‫ﺿﻐﻂ ﺍﻟﻤﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻻﻭﻟﻰ‬

‫‪2‬‬ ‫‪2‬‬
‫ﻛﻐﻢ‪/‬ﺳﻢ‬ ‫ﻛﻐﻢ‪/‬ﺳﻢ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺒﺌﺮ‬ ‫ﺭﻗﻢ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻤﻜﻤﻦ‬
‫ﻣﻌﺪﻝ ﺍﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻂ ﻣﻌﺪﻝ ﺍﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺯ ﻣﻖ ﻣﻌﺪﻝ ﺍﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻂ ﺍﻟﻒ ﻣﻌﺪﻝ ﺍﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺯ ﻣﻖ‬ ‫ﻟﺤﻴﺲ‪/‬‬
‫ﻣﻖ‪/‬ﻱ‬ ‫ﺏ‪/‬ﻱ‬ ‫ﻣﻖ‪/‬ﻱ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻒ ﺏ‪/‬ﻱ‬
‫‪1,7‬‬ ‫‪2,6‬‬ ‫‪1,9‬‬ ‫‪3‬‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺰﺑﻴﺮ‬ ‫‪1‬‬
‫‪2,1‬‬ ‫‪3,3‬‬ ‫‪2,2‬‬ ‫‪3,4‬‬ ‫‪5‬‬
‫‪2,5‬‬ ‫‪3,8‬‬ ‫‪2,6‬‬ ‫‪4,0‬‬ ‫‪7‬‬
‫‪1,3‬‬ ‫‪2,2‬‬ ‫‪1,5‬‬ ‫‪2,3‬‬ ‫‪11‬‬
‫‪2,1‬‬ ‫‪3,4‬‬ ‫‪2,5‬‬ ‫‪3,8‬‬ ‫‪17‬‬
‫‪9,8‬‬ ‫‪15,3‬‬ ‫‪10,7‬‬ ‫‪16,6‬‬ ‫ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﻣﻜﻤﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﺑﻴﺮ‬

‫‪A39‬‬
 ‫ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ‪16‬‬ ‫ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻄﻴﺔ‬

‫‪2,4‬‬ ‫‪3,7‬‬ ‫‪2,5‬‬ ‫‪3,9‬‬ ‫ﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ‬ ‫‪2‬‬

‫‪1,2‬‬ ‫‪1,9‬‬ ‫‪1,4‬‬ ‫‪2,2‬‬ ‫‪4‬‬
‫‪2,6‬‬ ‫‪4,1‬‬ ‫‪2,7‬‬ ‫‪4,2‬‬ ‫‪8‬‬
‫‪0,7‬‬ ‫‪1,0‬‬ ‫‪1,3‬‬ ‫‪2,0‬‬ ‫‪10‬‬
‫‪2,2‬‬ ‫‪3,4‬‬ ‫‪2,5‬‬ ‫‪3,8‬‬ ‫‪13‬‬
‫‪2,2‬‬ ‫‪3,4‬‬ ‫‪2,5‬‬ ‫‪3,8‬‬ ‫‪15‬‬
‫‪1,6‬‬ ‫‪2,5‬‬ ‫‪1,9‬‬ ‫‪3,0‬‬ ‫‪16‬‬
‫‪1,6‬‬ ‫‪2,5‬‬ ‫‪1,9‬‬ ‫‪3,0‬‬ ‫‪20‬‬
‫‪14,5‬‬ ‫‪22,5‬‬ ‫‪16,7‬‬ ‫‪26,0‬‬ ‫ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﻣﻜﻤﻦ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ‬
‫‪24,3‬‬ ‫‪37,8‬‬ ‫‪27,4‬‬ ‫‪42,6‬‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻤﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻲ ﻟﻠﺤﻘﻞ‬

‫ﺍﻟﺠﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ)‪ : (2‬ﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻻﺑﺎﺭ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺿﻐﻂ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻝ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﻄﺔ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺗﺨﻴﻴﺮ ﺍﻟﺨﻮﺍﻧﻖ ﻟﻼﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﻷﻧﺘﺎﺟﻴﺔ‬

‫ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺠﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ)‪ (2‬ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ﺗﻮﺿﺢ ﺃﻧﺨﻔﺎﺽ ﻣﻌﺪﻻﺕ ﺃﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻻﺑﺎﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻂ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﻤﺼﺎﺣﺐ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺿﻐﻂ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻝ ﻓﻲ ﻣﺤﻄﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻝ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻟﺨﻮﺍﻧﻖ ﺍﻻﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺘﺠﺔ‪.‬‬

‫‪ -4‬ﺍﻋﺎﺩﺓ ﺣﺴﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺠﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻻﻓﻘﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ ﺑﺎﻓﺘﺮﺍﺽ ﺍﻟﻤﺤﺪﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻴﺔ ‪:‬‬

‫ﺍﺑﻘﺎء ﺿﻐﻂ ﻗﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﺒﺌﺮ ﺍﻟﺠﺮﻳﺎﻧﻲ ﻟﻶﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺿﻐﻂ ﺍﻻﺷﺒﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺘﺮﺍﻭﺡ ﺑﻴﻦ )‪(2315.5 -2275‬‬ ‫‪x‬‬
‫ﺑﺎ‪/‬ﻋﻘﺪﺓ‪ 2‬ﻟﻤﻜﻤﻨﻲ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺰﺑﻴﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﻟﻲ ‪.‬‬

‫ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻓﺘﺤﺎﺕ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻖ ﺍﻵﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻤﺜﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺤﺴﻮﺑﺔ ﺑﻮﺍﺳﻄﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺮﻧﺎﻣﺞ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻫﺰ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻟـ )‪(Optimization‬‬ ‫‪x‬‬
‫ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻓﺘﺮﺍﺽ ﺍﻗﺼﻰ ﻓﺘﺤﺔ ﻟﻠﺨﻮﺍﻧﻖ ﻫﻲ )‪ (1,5‬ﻋﻘﺪﺓ ‪.‬‬

‫ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺿﻐﻂ ﺍﻟﻤﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻻﻭﻟﻰ )‪ (36‬ﻛﻐﻢ‪/‬ﺳﻢ‪ 2‬ﻓﻲ ﺣﺎﻟﺔ ‪ ،‬ﻭ)‪ (42‬ﻛﻐﻢ‪/‬ﺳﻢ‪ 2‬ﻓﻲ ﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺔ‪.‬‬ ‫‪x‬‬

‫ﻭﻗﺪ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﺤﺼﻠﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ ‪ /‬ﺍﻟﺠﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪: (3‬‬

‫ﺿﻐﻂ ﺍﻟﻤﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻻﻭﻟﻰ‬ ‫ﺿﻐﻂ ﺍﻟﻤﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻻﻭﻟﻰ‬

‫)‪ (42‬ﻛﻐﻢ‪/‬ﺳﻢ‪2‬‬ ‫)‪ (36‬ﻛﻐﻢ‪/‬ﺳﻢ‪2‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﺌﺮ‬ ‫ﺭﻗﻢ‬
‫ﺍﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﻓﺘﺤﺔ‬ ‫ﺍﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﻣﻌﺪﻝ‬ ‫ﻣﻌﺪﻝ‬ ‫ﻣﻌﺪﻝ ﺍﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﻣﻌﺪﻝ ﺍﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﻓﺘﺤﺔ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻤﻜﻤﻦ‬
‫ﻟﺤﻴﺲ‪/‬‬
‫ﻣﻖ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﻧﻖ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻒ ﺍﻟﻐﺎ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻂ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺨﺎﻧﻖ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺯ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻂ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺘﺮﺣﺔ‬ ‫ﻣﻖ‪/‬ﻱ‬ ‫ﺏ‪/‬ﻱ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺘﺮﺣﺔ‬ ‫ﻣﻖ ﻣﻖ‪/‬ﻱ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻒ ﺏ‪/‬ﻱ‬
‫‪96/64‬‬ ‫‪1,7‬‬ ‫‪2,6‬‬ ‫‪58/64‬‬ ‫‪1,8‬‬ ‫‪2,8‬‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺰﺑﻴﺮ‬ ‫‪1‬‬

‫‪A40‬‬
 ‫ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ‪16‬‬ ‫ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻄﻴﺔ‬

‫‪96/64‬‬ ‫‪4,5‬‬ ‫‪7,0‬‬ ‫‪96/64‬‬ ‫‪5,0‬‬ ‫‪7,7‬‬ ‫‪5‬‬

‫‪96/64‬‬ ‫‪2,5‬‬ ‫‪3,9‬‬ ‫‪96/64‬‬ ‫‪2,6‬‬ ‫‪4,1‬‬ ‫‪7‬‬
‫‪96/64‬‬ ‫‪1,4‬‬ ‫‪2,2‬‬ ‫‪96/64‬‬ ‫‪1,5‬‬ ‫‪2,4‬‬ ‫‪11‬‬
‫‪96/64‬‬ ‫‪2,3‬‬ ‫‪3,5‬‬ ‫‪60/64‬‬ ‫‪2,4‬‬ ‫‪3,7‬‬ ‫‪17‬‬
‫‪-‬‬ ‫‪12,4‬‬ ‫‪19,2‬‬ ‫‪-‬‬ ‫‪13,4‬‬ ‫‪20,8‬‬ ‫ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﻣﻜﻤﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﺑﻴﺮ‬
‫‪96/64‬‬ ‫‪2,4‬‬ ‫‪3,7‬‬ ‫‪96/64‬‬ ‫‪2,5‬‬ ‫‪4,0‬‬ ‫ﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ‬ ‫‪2‬‬
‫‪75/64‬‬ ‫‪1,3‬‬ ‫‪2,0‬‬ ‫‪42/64‬‬ ‫‪1,3‬‬ ‫‪2,0‬‬ ‫‪4‬‬
‫‪96/64‬‬ ‫‪5,2‬‬ ‫‪8,0‬‬ ‫‪96/64‬‬ ‫‪5,7‬‬ ‫‪8,9‬‬ ‫‪8‬‬
‫‪96/64‬‬ ‫‪0,6‬‬ ‫‪1,0‬‬ ‫‪40/64‬‬ ‫‪1,0‬‬ ‫‪1,5‬‬ ‫‪10‬‬
‫‪96/64‬‬ ‫‪2,4‬‬ ‫‪3,7‬‬ ‫‪59/64‬‬ ‫‪2,4‬‬ ‫‪3,7‬‬ ‫‪13‬‬
‫‪67/64‬‬ ‫‪2,2‬‬ ‫‪3,4‬‬ ‫‪52/64‬‬ ‫‪2,2‬‬ ‫‪3,4‬‬ ‫‪15‬‬
‫‪72/64‬‬ ‫‪1,6‬‬ ‫‪2,4‬‬ ‫‪46/64‬‬ ‫‪1,6‬‬ ‫‪2,4‬‬ ‫‪16‬‬
‫‪96/64‬‬ ‫‪1,6‬‬ ‫‪2,5‬‬ ‫‪48/64‬‬ ‫‪1,7‬‬ ‫‪2,6‬‬ ‫‪20‬‬
‫‪-‬‬ ‫‪17,3‬‬ ‫‪27,0‬‬ ‫‪-‬‬ ‫‪18,4‬‬ ‫‪28,6‬‬ ‫ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﻣﻜﻤﻦ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ‬
‫‪-‬‬ ‫‪29,7‬‬ ‫‪46,2‬‬ ‫‪-‬‬ ‫‪31,8‬‬ ‫‪49,4‬‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻤﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻲ ﻟﻠﺤﻘﻞ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺠﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ : (3‬ﻣﻌﺪﻻﺕ ﺍﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻻﺑﺎﺭ ﻭﻗﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﺨﻮﺍﻧﻖ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺘﺮﺣﺔ ﺑﺴﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﺠﻲ ‪ Prosper‬ﻭ ‪GAP‬‬

‫ﻳﺘﻀﺢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺠﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (3‬ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻓﻲ ﻣﻌﺪﻝ ﺍﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻻﺑﺎﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻂ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺎﺯ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺿﻐﻂ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻝ ﺍﻟﻰ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫)‪(36‬ﻛﻐﻢ‪/‬ﺳﻢ‪ 2‬ﺃﻭ ﺍﻧﺨﻔﺎﺽ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﺪﻻﺕ ﺑﻤﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺑﺴﻴﻂ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺗﺸﻐﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺯﻻﺕ ﺑﻀﻐﻂ )‪(42‬ﻛﻐﻢ‪/‬ﺳﻢ‬
‫ﺗﺠﺪﺭ ﺍﻷﺷﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻰ ﺍﻥ ﻣﻌﺪﻻﺕ ﺍﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻂ ﺍﻟﺠﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﻣﺤﺴﻮﺑﺔ ﺑﺸﺮﻁ ﻛﻮﻥ ﺿﻐﻂ ﻗﻌﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﺌﺮ ﺍﻟﺠﺮﻳﺎﻧﻲ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺿﻐﻂ‬
‫ﺍﻷﺷﺒﺎﻉ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﻀﻤﻦ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺣﺼﻮﻝ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺛﻨﺎﺋﻲ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﻤﻜﻤﻦ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﺠﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (4‬ﺃﺩﻧﺎﻩ ﻳﻮﺿﺢ ﻣﻘﺎﺭﻧﺔ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﻌﺪﻻﺕ ﺍﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻂ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺎﺯ ﻟﻤﻜﻤﻨﻲ ﺍﻟﺰﺑﻴﺮ ﻭﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﺿﻐﻮﻁ‬
‫ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻟﻠﻌﺰﻝ ‪:‬‬
‫‪2‬‬ ‫‪2‬‬ ‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺣﺎﻟﺔ )‪ (42‬ﻛﻐﻢ‪/‬ﺳﻢ‬ ‫ﺣﺎﻟﺔ )‪ (36‬ﻛﻐﻢ‪/‬ﺳﻢ‬ ‫ﺣﺎﻟﺔ )‪ (28‬ﻛﻐﻢ‪/‬ﺳﻢ‬
‫ﻣﻌﺪﻝ‬ ‫ﻣﻌﺪﻝ‬ ‫ﻣﻌﺪﻝ‬ ‫ﻣﻌﺪﻝ‬ ‫ﻣﻌﺪﻝ‬ ‫ﻣﻌﺪﻝ‬
‫ﺍﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺯ‬ ‫ﺍﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺎﺝ‬ ‫ﺍﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺎﺝ‬ ‫ﺍﻧﺘﺎﺝ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻤﻜﻤﻦ‬
‫ﻣﻖ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻂ‬ ‫ﻣﻖ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻂ‬ ‫ﻣﻖ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻂ‬
‫ﻣﻖ‪/‬ﻱ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻒ ﺏ‪/‬ﻱ‬ ‫ﻣﻖ‪/‬ﻱ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻒ ﺏ‪/‬ﻱ‬ ‫ﻣﻖ‪/‬ﻱ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻒ ﺏ‪/‬ﻱ‬
‫‪12,4‬‬ ‫‪19,2‬‬ ‫‪13,4‬‬ ‫‪20,8‬‬ ‫‪11,7‬‬ ‫‪18,1‬‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺰﺑﻴﺮ‬
‫‪17,3‬‬ ‫‪27,0‬‬ ‫‪18,4‬‬ ‫‪28,6‬‬ ‫‪18,8‬‬ ‫‪29,3‬‬ ‫ﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ‬
‫‪29,7‬‬ ‫‪46,2‬‬ ‫‪31,8‬‬ ‫‪49,4‬‬ ‫‪30,5‬‬ ‫‪47,4‬‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻤﺠﻤﻮﻉ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺠﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ : (4‬ﻣﻌﺪﻻﺕ ﺍﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻂ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺎﺯ ﻟﻤﻜﻤﻨﻲ ﺍﻟﺰﺑﻴﺮ ﻭﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﺿﻐﻮﻁ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻟﻠﻌﺰﻝ‬

‫‪A41‬‬
 ‫ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ‪16‬‬ ‫ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻄﻴﺔ‬

‫ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺟﺎﺕ‪:‬‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﺠﺪﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﻋﻼﻩ ﻳﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻼﺣﻈﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ ‪:‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﻣﻮﺍﺋﻤﺔ ﻣﻤﺘﺎﺯﺓ ﻟﻤﻌﺪﻻﺕ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺎﺳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺤﺴﻮﺑﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﻟﻲ ﻟﻀﻐﻂ ﺍﻟﻤﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻻﻭﻟﻰ )‪(28‬‬
‫ﻛﻐﻢ‪/‬ﺳﻢ‪ 2‬ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺎﻟﻐﺔ ﺣﻮﺍﻟﻲ )‪ ( 47‬ﺍﻟﻒ ﺏ‪/‬ﻱ ‪ .‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻛﻤﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﻤﺼﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﻤﺤﺴﻮﺑﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺮﻣﺠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻫﺰﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﺨﺪﻣﺔ ‪ ،‬ﺣﻮﺍﻟﻲ )‪ (30‬ﻣﻖ ﻣﻖ‪/‬ﻱ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻼ ﺍﻟﻤﻜﻤﻨﻴﻦ ‪.‬‬

‫‪ -2‬ﻓﻲ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺿﻐﻂ ﺍﻟﻤﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻻﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﻰ )‪ (36‬ﻛﻐﻢ‪/‬ﺳﻢ‪ 2‬ﺍﻭ )‪ (42‬ﻛﻐﻢ‪/‬ﺳﻢ‪ 2‬ﻣﻊ ﺑﻘﺎء ﻗﻴﺎﺳﺎﺕ ﻓﺘﺤﺎﺕ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻖ ﺍﻵﺑﺎﺭ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎﻫﻲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻵﻥ ‪ ،‬ﻓﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﺪﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﺳﻴﻨﺨﻔﺾ ﺑﻤﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺣﻮﺍﻟﻲ )‪ (5‬ﺁﻻﻑ ﺏ‪/‬ﻱ ﻭ)‪ (10‬ﺁﻻﻑ ﺏ‪/‬ﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﻟﻲ ﻟﻴﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﻰ ﺣﻮﺍﻟﻲ )‪ (42‬ﺍﻟﻒ ﺏ‪/‬ﻱ ﻭ )‪ (37‬ﺍﻟﻒ ﺏ‪/‬ﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﻟﻲ ‪ .‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﺍﻥ ﻛﻤﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺯ ﺳﺘﻨﺨﻔﺾ ﻫﻲ‬
‫ﺍﻻﺧﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﻰ )‪(27‬ﻣﻖ ﻣﻖ‪/‬ﻱ ﻭ)‪ (24‬ﻣﻖ ﻣﻖ‪/‬ﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﻟﻲ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻛﻼ ﺍﻟﻤﻜﻤﻨﻴﻦ ‪.‬‬

‫‪ -3‬ﻓﻲ ﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﻓﺘﺤﺎﺕ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻖ ﺍﻵﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻤﺜﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺤﺴﻮﺑﺔ ﺑﻮﺍﺳﻄﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺮﻧﺎﻣﺞ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻫﺰ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻟـ )‪(Optimization‬‬
‫ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻓﺘﺮﺍﺽ ﺍﻗﺼﻰ ﻓﺘﺤﺔ ﻟﻠﺨﻮﺍﻧﻖ ﻫﻲ )‪ (1,5‬ﻋﻘﺪﺓ ‪ ،‬ﻓﺄﻥ ﻣﻌﺪﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﻘﻖ ﺳﻴﺒﻠﻎ ﺣﻮﺍﻟﻲ )‪ (49‬ﺍﻟﻒ ﺏ‪/‬ﻱ‬
‫ﻭ)‪ (46‬ﺍﻟﻒ ﺏ‪/‬ﻱ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻟﻀﻐﻂ ﺍﻟﻤﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻻﻭﻟﻰ )‪ (36‬ﻛﻐﻢ‪/‬ﺳﻢ‪ 2‬ﻭ)‪ (42‬ﻛﻐﻢ‪/‬ﺳﻢ‪ 2‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﻟﻲ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻛﻼ ﺍﻟﻤﻜﻤﻨﻴﻦ‬
‫‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﺑﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭﻫﺎ ﺣﻮﺍﻟﻲ )‪ (2‬ﺍﻟﻒ ﺏ‪/‬ﻱ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺿﻐﻂ )‪ (36‬ﻛﻐﻢ‪/‬ﺳﻢ‪ ، 2‬ﻭﺑﺎﻧﺨﻔﺎﺽ ﻁﻔﻴﻒ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭﻩ ﺣﻮﺍﻟﻲ )‪(1000‬‬
‫ﺏ‪/‬ﻱ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺿﻐﻂ )‪ (42‬ﻛﻐﻢ‪/‬ﺳﻢ‪ . 2‬ﺍﻣﺎ ﻛﻤﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﻘﻘﺔ ‪ ،‬ﻓﺘﺒﻠﻎ ﺣﻮﺍﻟﻲ )‪ (32‬ﻣﻖ ﻣﻖ‪/‬ﻱ ‪ ،‬ﻭ)‪ (30‬ﻣﻖ ﻣﻖ‪/‬ﻱ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﻟﻲ ‪.‬‬

‫‪ -4‬ﺍﻥ ﺗﺨﻔﻴﺾ ﺿﻐﻂ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻝ ﻟﻀﻔﺎﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻝ ﻓﻲ ﻣﺤﻄﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻝ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺤﻞ ﺍﻷﻣﺜﻞ ﻟﻀﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺗﻨﺎﺝ ﺍﻻﺑﺎﺭ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎ‬
‫ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻈﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﻣﻬﻤﺔ ﺟﺪﺍ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻌﻄﻲ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺃﻓﻀﻞ ﻛﺜﻴﺮﺍ ﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﺗﺘﻢ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻄﺮﺓ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻭﺗﻨﻈﻴﻤﻬﺎ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ‬
‫ﺻﺤﻴﺢ‪.‬‬

‫‪ -5‬ﺃﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺮﺍﻣﺠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻬﻴﺪﺭﻭﻟﻴﻜﻴﺔ ) ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﺠﻲ ‪ Prosper‬ﻭ ‪ ( GAP‬ﻳﻌﺘﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﻭﺳﻴﻠﺔ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﺔ ﺟﺪﺍ ﻻﺧﺘﺼﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ‬
‫ﻭﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻈﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﻟﻤﺜﻠﻰ ﻟﻼﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﻟﻼﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻄﻴﺔ ‪.‬‬

‫ﺃﻷﺷﻜﺎﻝ )‪ ( 13-1‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺗﻤﺜﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﻀﻐﻂ ﺍﻟﺠﺮﻳﺎﻧﻲ ﻭﻣﻌﺪﻝ ﺍﻷﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﻟﻼﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺘﺠﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺗﻮﺿﺢ ﺣﺼﻮﻝ ﻣﻮﺍﺋﻤﺔ‬
‫ﺟﻴﺪﺓ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﻌﺪﻻﺕ ﺍﻷﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺎﺳﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺤﻘﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺤﺴﻮﺑﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺒﺮﻧﺎﻣﺞ ﻟﻜﺎﻓﺔ ﺍﺑﺎﺭ ﺣﻘﻞ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻴﺲ ) ‪ ( LU-‬ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺘﺠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻜﻤﻨﻲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺰﺑﻴﺮ ﻭﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ ‪:‬‬

‫‪A42‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ‪16‬‬ ‫ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻄﻴﺔ‬

‫ﺷﻜﻞ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪(1‬‬

‫ﺷﻜﻞ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪(2‬‬

‫‪A43‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ‪16‬‬ ‫ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻄﻴﺔ‬

‫ﺷﻜﻞ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪(3‬‬

‫ﺷﻜﻞ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪(3‬‬

‫ﺷﻜﻞ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪(4‬‬

‫‪A44‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ‪16‬‬ ‫ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻄﻴﺔ‬

‫ﺷﻜﻞ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪(5‬‬

‫ﺷﻜﻞ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪(6‬‬

‫‪A45‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ‪16‬‬ ‫ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻄﻴﺔ‬

‫ﺷﻜﻞ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪(7‬‬

‫ﺷﻜﻞ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪(8‬‬

‫‪A46‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ‪16‬‬ ‫ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻄﻴﺔ‬

‫ﺷﻜﻞ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪(9‬‬

‫ﺷﻜﻞ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪(10‬‬

‫‪A47‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ‪16‬‬ ‫ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻄﻴﺔ‬

‫ﺷﻜﻞ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪(11‬‬

‫ﺷﻜﻞ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪(12‬‬

‫‪A48‬‬
 ‫ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ‪16‬‬ ‫ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻄﻴﺔ‬

‫ﺷﻜﻞ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪(13‬‬

‫ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻷﻧﺘﺎﺟﻴﺔ‬ ‫ﻣﻌﺪﻝ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺿﻐﻂ ﻗﻌﺮ‬ ‫ﻧﺴﺒﺔ‬ ‫ﺿﻐﻂ ﺭﺍﺱ‬ ‫ﻓﺘﺤﺔ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﻧﻖ‬ ‫ﺭﻗﻢ‬
‫‪ PI‬ﺏ‪/‬ﻱ‪/‬ﻋﻘﺪﺓ‬ ‫ﺿﻐﻂ ﻗﻌﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﺌﺮ‬ ‫ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺎﺝ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﺌﺮ ﺍﻟﺠﺮﻳﺎﻧﻲ‬ ‫ﻗﺎﻁﻊ‬ ‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﺌﺮ ﺍﻟﺠﺮﻳﺎﻧﻲ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺎﺳﺔ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺒﺌﺮ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻤﻐﻠﻖ ﻛﻐﻢ‪/‬ﺳﻢ‬ ‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻒ‬
‫ﻛﻐﻢ‪/‬ﺳﻢ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻤﺎء ‪%‬‬ ‫ﻛﻐﻢ‪/‬ﺳﻢ‬ ‫‪64/‬‬ ‫ﻟﺤﻴﺲ‪/‬‬
‫ﺏ‪/‬ﻱ‬
‫‪2.01‬‬ ‫‪181.9‬‬ ‫‪1,4‬‬ ‫‪299‬‬ ‫‪30‬‬ ‫‪65/64‬‬ ‫‪3465‬‬ ‫‪1‬‬
‫‪5.66‬‬ ‫‪226.35‬‬ ‫‪0.2‬‬ ‫‪278,4‬‬ ‫‪30‬‬ ‫‪64/64‬‬ ‫‪4330‬‬ ‫‪2‬‬
‫‪1.67‬‬ ‫‪172.36‬‬ ‫‪2,4‬‬ ‫‪278,4‬‬ ‫‪33‬‬ ‫‪32/64‬‬ ‫‪2610‬‬ ‫‪4‬‬
‫‪5.84‬‬ ‫‪258.82‬‬ ‫‪0,2‬‬ ‫‪299‬‬ ‫‪70‬‬ ‫‪32/64‬‬ ‫‪3450‬‬ ‫‪5‬‬
‫‪6.75‬‬ ‫‪255.8‬‬ ‫‪2‬‬ ‫‪299‬‬ ‫‪35‬‬ ‫‪32/64‬‬ ‫‪4285‬‬ ‫‪7‬‬
‫‪8.08‬‬ ‫‪238.64‬‬ ‫ﺻﻔﺮ‬ ‫‪275‬‬ ‫‪68‬‬ ‫‪64/64‬‬ ‫‪4320‬‬ ‫‪8‬‬
‫‪1.68‬‬ ‫‪155.74‬‬ ‫ﺻﻔﺮ‬ ‫‪260‬‬ ‫‪30‬‬ ‫‪45/64‬‬ ‫‪2570‬‬ ‫‪10‬‬
‫‪2.09‬‬ ‫‪215.35‬‬ ‫‪0,2‬‬ ‫‪299‬‬ ‫‪32‬‬ ‫‪32/64‬‬ ‫‪2570‬‬ ‫‪11‬‬
‫‪3.20‬‬ ‫‪185.64‬‬ ‫‪0,2‬‬ ‫‪276,6‬‬ ‫‪40‬‬ ‫‪64/64‬‬ ‫‪4285‬‬ ‫‪13‬‬
‫‪2.84‬‬ ‫‪174.99‬‬ ‫‪0,2‬‬ ‫‪278,4‬‬ ‫‪36‬‬ ‫‪45/64‬‬ ‫‪4320‬‬ ‫‪15‬‬
‫‪2.04‬‬ ‫‪163.26‬‬ ‫ﺻﻔﺮ‬ ‫‪278,6‬‬ ‫‪33‬‬ ‫‪45/64‬‬ ‫‪3465‬‬ ‫‪16‬‬
‫‪2.62‬‬ ‫‪186.88‬‬ ‫‪0,2‬‬ ‫‪299‬‬ ‫‪35‬‬ ‫‪45/64‬‬ ‫‪4320‬‬ ‫‪17‬‬
‫‪2.10‬‬ ‫‪167.93‬‬ ‫‪0,2‬‬ ‫‪280‬‬ ‫‪33‬‬ ‫‪32/64‬‬ ‫‪3465‬‬ ‫‪20‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺠﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (5‬ﻳﻮﺿﺢ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﻭﻣﺨﺮﺟﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺮﺍﻣﺞ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﺨﺪﻣﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺪﻻﺕ ﺃﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﻟﻠﻨﻔﻂ ﻭﺿﻐﻮﻁ ﻗﻌﺮﻳﺔ‬
‫ﻭﺳﻄﺤﻴﺔ ﺳﺎﻛﻨﺔ ﻭﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻟﻼﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺘﺠﺔ ﺃﺿﺎﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﻰ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﻗﺎﻁﻊ ﺍﻟﻤﺎء ﻭﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻷﻧﺘﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺤﺴﻮﺏ ﻟﻜﻞ ﺑﺌﺮ‬

‫‪A49‬‬
 ‫ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ‪16‬‬ ‫ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻄﻴﺔ‬

‫ﻁﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻷﻧﺘﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﻟﻜﻞ ﺑﺌﺮ‪:‬‬

‫) ‪PI = Q / ( Pe – Pwf‬‬
‫) ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻷﻧﺘﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﺏ‪/‬ﻱ‪/‬ﻋﻘﺪﺓ‪PI : Productivity Index bbl/day/psi ( 2‬‬
‫) ﻣﻌﺪﻝ ﺍﻷﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﺏ‪/‬ﻱ( ‪Q : Flow rate bbl/day‬‬

‫) ﺿﻐﻂ ﻗﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﺒﺌﺮ ﺍﻟﻤﻐﻠﻖ ﺑﺎﻭﻧﺪ‪/‬ﻋﻘﺪﺓ‪Pe : Well bore close in pressure psi (2‬‬

‫) ﺿﻐﻂ ﻗﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﺒﺌﺮ ﺍﻟﺠﺮﻳﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺎﻭﻧﺪ‪/‬ﻋﻘﺪﺓ‪Pwf : Well bore flowing pressure psi ( 2‬‬

‫ﻣﻼﺣﻈﺔ ‪ :‬ﺑﺎﻭﻧﺪ‪/‬ﻋﻘﺪﺓ‪) = 2‬ﻛﻐﻢ‪/‬ﺳﻢ‪14.7 * (2‬‬

‫ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﺠﺪﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﻤﻠﺤﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﺨﺪﻣﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ‪:‬‬

‫‪ -1‬ﺑﻴﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺍﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻵﺑﺎﺭ ﻭﺍﺳﻠﻮﺏ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺎﺝ ‪ .‬ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (A1‬ﻣﻠﺤﻖ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪:(1‬‬

‫ﻗﻄﺮﻫﺎ‬ ‫ﻋﻤﻖ‬ ‫ﻗﻄﺮﻩ‬ ‫ﻋﻤﻖ ﺍﻧﺒﻮﺏ‬ ‫ﺭﻗﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﺌﺮ‬

‫ﺍﻟﻤﻼﺣﻈﺎﺕ‬
‫ﻋﻘﺪﺓ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺒﻄﺎﻧﺔ ﻣﺘﺮﺍً‬ ‫ﻋﻘﺪﺓ‬ ‫ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﻣﺘﺮﺍً‬ ‫ﻟﺤﻴﺲ‪/‬‬
‫ﻣﻨﺘﺠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﺍﻟﺤﻠﻘﻲ ﻭﺍﻧﺎﺑﻴﺐ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺎﺝ‪/‬ﻣﻜﻤﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﺑﻴﺮ‬ ‫‪5 1/2‬‬ ‫‪2792‬‬ ‫‪2 7/8‬‬ ‫‪2500‬‬ ‫‪1‬‬
‫ﻣﻨﺘﺠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻧﺎﺑﻴﺐ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺎﺝ‪ /‬ﻣﻜﻤﻦ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ‬ ‫‪6 5/8‬‬ ‫‪2564,5‬‬ ‫‪2 7/8‬‬ ‫‪2452‬‬ ‫‪2‬‬
‫ﻣﻨﺘﺠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﺍﻟﺤﻠﻘﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺎﺑﻴﺐ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺎﺝ‪ /‬ﻣﻜﻤﻦ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ‬ ‫‪6 5/8‬‬ ‫‪2576,7‬‬ ‫‪2 7/8‬‬ ‫‪2000,7‬‬ ‫‪4‬‬
‫ﻣﻨﺘﺠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﺍﻟﺤﻠﻘﻲ ﻭﺍﻧﺎﺑﻴﺐ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺎﺝ‪/‬ﻣﻜﻤﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﺑﻴﺮ‬ ‫‪6 5/8‬‬ ‫‪2796‬‬ ‫‪2 7/8‬‬ ‫‪2450‬‬ ‫‪5‬‬
‫ﻣﻨﺘﺠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻧﺎﺑﻴﺐ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺎﺝ‪/‬ﻣﻜﻤﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﺑﻴﺮ‬ ‫‪6 5/8‬‬ ‫‪2812,5‬‬ ‫‪2 7/8‬‬ ‫‪2736‬‬ ‫‪7‬‬
‫ﻣﻨﺘﺠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﺍﻟﺤﻠﻘﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺎﺑﻴﺐ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺎﺝ‪ /‬ﻣﻜﻤﻦ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ‬ ‫‪7‬‬ ‫‪2559,7‬‬ ‫‪2 7/8‬‬ ‫‪2448‬‬ ‫‪8‬‬
‫ﻣﻨﺘﺠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻧﺎﺑﻴﺐ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺎﺝ‪ /‬ﻣﻜﻤﻦ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ‬ ‫‪7‬‬ ‫‪2591‬‬ ‫‪2 7/8‬‬ ‫‪2450‬‬ ‫‪10‬‬
‫ﻣﻨﺘﺠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻧﺎﺑﻴﺐ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺎﺝ‪/‬ﻣﻜﻤﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﺑﻴﺮ‬ ‫‪6 5/8‬‬ ‫‪2805‬‬ ‫‪2 7/8‬‬ ‫‪2401‬‬ ‫‪11‬‬
‫ﻣﻨﺘﺠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﺍﻟﺤﻠﻘﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺎﺑﻴﺐ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺎﺝ‪ /‬ﻣﻜﻤﻦ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ‬ ‫‪7‬‬ ‫‪2569‬‬ ‫‪2 7/8‬‬ ‫‪2485‬‬ ‫‪13‬‬
‫ﻣﻨﺘﺠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﺍﻟﺤﻠﻘﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺎﺑﻴﺐ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺎﺝ‪ /‬ﻣﻜﻤﻦ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ‬ ‫‪7‬‬ ‫‪2565,7‬‬ ‫‪2 7/8‬‬ ‫‪2300‬‬ ‫‪15‬‬
‫ﻣﻨﺘﺠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﺍﻟﺤﻠﻘﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺎﺑﻴﺐ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺎﺝ‪ /‬ﻣﻜﻤﻦ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ‬ ‫‪7‬‬ ‫‪2573,2‬‬ ‫‪2 7/8‬‬ ‫‪2475‬‬ ‫‪16‬‬
‫ﻣﻨﺘﺠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﺍﻟﺤﻠﻘﻲ ﻭﺍﻧﺎﺑﻴﺐ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺎﺝ‪/‬ﻣﻜﻤﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﺑﻴﺮ‬ ‫‪6 5/8‬‬ ‫‪2796‬‬ ‫‪2 7/8‬‬ ‫‪2400‬‬ ‫‪17‬‬
‫ﻣﻨﺘﺠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﺍﻟﺤﻠﻘﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺎﺑﻴﺐ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺎﺝ‪ /‬ﻣﻜﻤﻦ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ‬ ‫‪7‬‬ ‫‪2584,5‬‬ ‫‪2 7/8‬‬ ‫‪2224‬‬ ‫‪20‬‬

‫‪A50‬‬
 ‫ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ‪16‬‬ ‫ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻄﻴﺔ‬

‫‪ -2‬ﺑﻴﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺨﻮﺍﺹ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﺰﻳﺎﻭﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺮﻣﻮﺩﻳﻨﺎﻣﻴﻜﻴﺔ )‪ (PVT‬ﻟﻠﻨﻔﻂ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺘﺞ ‪ .‬ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (A2‬ﻣﻠﺤﻖ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪: (2‬‬

‫‪GOR‬‬ ‫‪μ‬‬ ‫‪T‬‬ ‫‪Pb‬‬

‫‪API‬‬ ‫‪Bo‬‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻤﻜﻤﻦ‬
‫‪m3/m3‬‬ ‫‪cp‬‬ ‫‪̊C‬‬ ‫‪psi‬‬
‫‪31,4‬‬ ‫‪110‬‬ ‫‪1.3773‬‬ ‫‪0.8623‬‬ ‫‪80‬‬ ‫‪2275‬‬ ‫ﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ‬
‫‪31,9‬‬ ‫‪114‬‬ ‫‪1.43935‬‬ ‫‪0.7028‬‬ ‫‪81‬‬ ‫‪2315.5‬‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺰﺑﻴﺮ‬

‫‪ -3‬ﻣﻌﺪﻻﺕ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﻭﺍﻟﻀﻐﻮﻁ ﺍﻟﺴﻄﺤﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻌﺮﻳﺔ ‪ ،‬ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﻓﺘﺤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺨﻮﺍﻧﻖ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻤﺬﺟﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻄﺤﻴﺔ ‪ .‬ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ‬
‫)‪ (A3‬ﻣﻠﺤﻖ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪:(3‬‬

‫ﺿﻐﻂ ﺭﺍﺱ ﺍﻟﺒﺌﺮ ﺿﻐﻂ ﻗﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﺒﺌﺮ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ‬ ‫ﻣﻌﺪﻝ‬

‫ﺍﻟﺨﺎﻧﻖ‬ ‫ﻓﺘﺤﺔ‬ ‫ﺭﻗﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﺌﺮ‬
‫ﻗﺎﻁﻊ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻤﻐﻠﻖ ﻛﻐﻢ‪/‬ﺳﻢ‪2‬‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺠﺮﻳﺎﻧﻲ‬ ‫ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺎﺝ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺎﺳﺔ‬ ‫ﻟﺤﻴﺲ‪/‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻤﺎء ‪%‬‬ ‫ﻛﻐﻢ‪/‬ﺳﻢ‪2‬‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻒ ﺏ‪/‬ﻱ‬
‫‪1,4‬‬ ‫‪299‬‬ ‫‪30‬‬ ‫‪65/64‬‬ ‫‪3465‬‬ ‫‪1‬‬
‫‪0.2‬‬ ‫‪278,4‬‬ ‫‪30‬‬ ‫‪64/64‬‬ ‫‪4330‬‬ ‫‪2‬‬
‫‪2,4‬‬ ‫‪278,4‬‬ ‫‪33‬‬ ‫‪32/64‬‬ ‫‪2610‬‬ ‫‪4‬‬
‫‪0,2‬‬ ‫‪299‬‬ ‫‪70‬‬ ‫‪32/64‬‬ ‫‪3450‬‬ ‫‪5‬‬
‫‪2‬‬ ‫‪299‬‬ ‫‪35‬‬ ‫‪32/64‬‬ ‫‪4285‬‬ ‫‪7‬‬
‫ﺻﻔﺮ‬ ‫‪275‬‬ ‫‪68‬‬ ‫‪64/64‬‬ ‫‪4320‬‬ ‫‪8‬‬
‫ﺻﻔﺮ‬ ‫‪260‬‬ ‫‪30‬‬ ‫‪45/64‬‬ ‫‪2570‬‬ ‫‪10‬‬
‫‪0,2‬‬ ‫‪299‬‬ ‫‪32‬‬ ‫‪32/64‬‬ ‫‪2570‬‬ ‫‪11‬‬
‫‪0,2‬‬ ‫‪276,6‬‬ ‫‪40‬‬ ‫‪64/64‬‬ ‫‪4285‬‬ ‫‪13‬‬
‫‪0,2‬‬ ‫‪278,4‬‬ ‫‪36‬‬ ‫‪45/64‬‬ ‫‪4320‬‬ ‫‪15‬‬
‫ﺻﻔﺮ‬ ‫‪278,6‬‬ ‫‪33‬‬ ‫‪45/64‬‬ ‫‪3465‬‬ ‫‪16‬‬
‫‪0,2‬‬ ‫‪299‬‬ ‫‪35‬‬ ‫‪45/64‬‬ ‫‪4320‬‬ ‫‪17‬‬
‫‪0,2‬‬ ‫‪280‬‬ ‫‪33‬‬ ‫‪32/64‬‬ ‫‪3465‬‬ ‫‪20‬‬

‫‪A51‬‬
 ‫ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ‪16‬‬ ‫ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻄﻴﺔ‬

‫‪ -4‬ﺑﻴﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻰ ﻣﺤﻄﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻝ ‪ .‬ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪ (A4‬ﻣﻠﺤﻖ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪: (4‬‬
‫ﺧﻂ‬ ‫ﻁﻮﻝ‬ ‫ﺍﺳﻢ‬ ‫ﺧﻂ‬ ‫ﻁﻮﻝ‬ ‫ﺭﻗﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﺌﺮ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﻄﺮ)ﻋﻘﺪﺓ(‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻤﻜﻤﻦ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻘﻄﺮ)ﻋﻘﺪﺓ(‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻤﻜﻤﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻞ)ﻣﺘﺮ(‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺒﺌﺮ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻞ)ﻣﺘﺮ(‬ ‫ﻟﺤﻴﺲ ‪/‬‬
‫‪8‬‬ ‫‪1450‬‬ ‫‪4‬‬ ‫‪8‬‬ ‫‪1330‬‬ ‫‪1‬‬

‫ﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ‬

‫ﺍﻟﺰﺑﻴﺮ‬
‫‪8‬‬ ‫‪1985‬‬ ‫‪8‬‬ ‫‪8‬‬ ‫‪1250‬‬ ‫‪5‬‬
‫‪6‬‬ ‫‪1150‬‬ ‫‪10‬‬ ‫‪8‬‬ ‫‪2100‬‬ ‫‪7‬‬
‫‪8‬‬ ‫‪1670‬‬ ‫‪13‬‬ ‫‪6‬‬ ‫‪1750‬‬ ‫‪11‬‬
‫‪8‬‬ ‫‪2050‬‬ ‫‪15‬‬ ‫‪8‬‬ ‫‪1680‬‬ ‫‪17‬‬
‫‪6‬‬ ‫‪1780‬‬ ‫‪16‬‬ ‫‪8‬‬ ‫‪2250‬‬ ‫‪2‬‬

‫ﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ‬
‫‪8‬‬ ‫‪1950‬‬ ‫‪20‬‬

‫‪A52‬‬
 16 ‫ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ‬ ‫ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻄﻴﺔ‬

: ‫ﺍﻟﻤﺼﺎﺩﺭ‬

1. WELL DESIGN Drilling and Production B.C. Craft & W.R. Holden Petroleum
Engineering Department Louisiana State University& E.D. Graves,Jr.The Dow
Chemical Company Prentice-Hall, Inc. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 1962

2. Production Optimization using NODALTM Analysis OGCI, Inc., Petroskills, LLC. And
H. Dale BeggsP. O. Box 35448 Tulsa, Oklahoma 74153-0448

A53