Professional Documents
Culture Documents
• Recognize an ethical
dilemma.
5-2
Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill
Education.
Chapter 05 - Ethics in International Business
Introduction
Ethical Dilemmas
5-3
Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
Chapter 05 - Ethics in International Business
Chapter Summary
Ask students whether the British manager acted ethically. Jot the responses of students on
the board according to whether students believe the action was ethical or unethical, and the
reasoning behind the argument.
Now, ask students about the following scenario. A U.S. law firm has box seats at all the
major professional games (baseball, hockey, basketball) and season tickets to the nearest
Big-10 conference university games. The partners take their prospective clients to these
games, wine and dine them, and play golf together at the firm’s expense at posh courses.
The opening case describes the deplorable working conditions and the environmental
impact of extracting lead components for resale from used vehicle and industrial batteries.
Most of the exporting of lead batteries to Mexico is done by intermediaries in the United
States that buy up old batteries and then ship them over the border to the cheapest
processor, typically a Mexican company. Some of the larger U.S. companies in this type
of business try to adhere to U.S. standards—typically by building their own facilities in
Mexico. However, many of the smaller U.S. companies leave it up to their Mexican
suppliers to monitor employee health effects and environmental impacts to the local region.
Discussion of the case can revolve around the following questions.
1. Why do U.S. companies contract out to factories like the ones in Mexico? Discuss the
advantages and disadvantages of outsourcing to other countries.
5-4
Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
Chapter 05 - Ethics in International Business
2. Should U.S. businesses that contract with Mexican companies be held responsible for
working conditions in the foreign facilities? Why or why not?
3. How do companies that outsource this dangerous lead recycling process contribute to
the harsh working conditions found at these facilities in Mexico? Explain your response.
LECTURE OUTLINE
This lecture outline follows the Power Point Presentation (PPT) provided along with this
instructor’s manual. The PPT slides include additional notes that can be viewed by clicking
on “view,” then on “notes.” The following provides a brief overview of each Power Point
slide along with teaching tips, and additional perspectives.
Another Perspective: The Carnegie Council on Ethics and International Affairs maintains
a very substantive and thought-provoking website at {http://www.carnegiecouncil.org/}.
This site contains publications that comment on many of the ethical issues that surround
globalization and international business.
5-5
Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
Chapter 05 - Ethics in International Business
The tragedy of the commons occurs when a resource held in common by all, but owned
by no one, is overused by individuals, resulting in its degradation.
Business ethics reflect personal ethics (the generally accepted principles of right and
wrong governing the conduct of individuals). The personal ethical code that guides our
behavior comes from a number of sources, including our parents, our schools, our
religion, and the media.
5-6
Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
Chapter 05 - Ethics in International Business
Home country managers working abroad in multinational firms may experience more
than the usual degree of pressure to violate their personal ethics because they are away
from their ordinary social context and supporting culture, and they are psychologically
and geographically distant from the parent company.
Business people sometimes do not realize that they are behaving unethically simply
because they fail to ask the relevant question—is this decision or action ethical?
The term organization culture refers to the values and norms that are shared among
employees of an organization.
When there is pressure from the parent company to meet performance goals that are
unrealistic, and can only be attained by cutting corners or acting in an unethical manner,
unethical behavior may result.
Leaders are vital in helping a firm establish its organization culture, and setting examples.
If leaders are not acting ethically, other employees may not act ethically. Societal culture
can also influence behavior.
5-7
Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
Chapter 05 - Ethics in International Business
Not only should businesses strive to identify and hire people with a strong sense of
personal ethics, but it is also in the interests of prospective employees to find out as much
as they can about the ethical climate in an organization.
To foster ethical behavior, businesses need to build an organization culture that places a
high value on ethical behavior.
Business people need a moral compass to help determine whether a decision is ethical.
Managers can also use a five-step process to think through ethical problems.
To ensure ethical behavior in a business, a number of firms now have ethics officers.
5-8
Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
Chapter 05 - Ethics in International Business
ANSWER 1: This question, which illustrates a potentially very real ethical dilemma
facing managers working in foreign subsidiaries, is designed to stimulate class
discussion. Students should recognize that neither alternative—violating the company’s
position on child labor, nor putting the child out on the streets—seems acceptable. In the
end, many students may agree that allowing the child to continue to work in the factory is
the lesser of the two evils.
QUESTION 2: Drawing upon John Rawls’s concept of the veil of ignorance, develop an
ethical code that will (a) guide the decisions of a large oil multinational toward
environmental protection, and (b) influence the policies of a clothing company to
outsourcing of manufacturing process.
ANSWER 2: John Rawls suggests that a decision is just and ethical if people would
allow for it when designing a social system under a veil of ignorance. Rawls’s veil of
ignorance is a conceptual tool that can contribute towards the moral compass that
managers can use to help them navigate through difficult ethical dilemmas. This question
can produce some interesting responses particularly in a class with a diverse group of
nationalities.
5-9
Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
Chapter 05 - Ethics in International Business
ANSWER 4: Students will probably be divided on this question, and a lively debate
should ensue. Certainly, the notion of when in Rome, do as the Romans do applies.
However, those taking this perspective should recognize that it may be difficult to draw
the line on exactly what is acceptable under this guise, and when bribery goes too far.
ANSWER 5: Students will probably approach this question in very different ways. Some
students will probably argue that because the “big man” in question is involved in
unethical behavior like drug trafficking, the manager should not even consider making
the “donation.” Other students may take the perspective that because drug trafficking is a
fact of life in some countries, this needs to be viewed differently. If the “big man” is
actually using his muscle to provide assistance to help the poor, then perhaps the manager
should consider making the donation.
QUESTION 6: Reread the Management Focus feature on Unocal and answer the
following questions:
a. Was it ethical for Unocal to enter into a partnership with a brutal military dictatorship
for financial gain?
b. What actions could Unocal have taken, short of not investing at all, to safeguard the
human rights of people impacted by the gas pipeline project?
ANSWER 6:
a. Unocal made its investment in Myanmar just as many other companies were leaving
the country in protest of the nation’s brutal military dictatorship. The company had
formed an agreement with the government that involved clearing a path for a new
pipeline. The investment became controversial when, in order to fulfill the agreement,
Myanmar’s army forcibly moved villagers and then forced them to work under slave-like
conditions. Unocal claims it had no knowledge of what was occurring, but this claim was
rejected by a judge who heard the case that was filed against Unocal on behalf of
Myanmar villagers.
b. Students will probably be familiar with the notion that even if something is not
explicitly forbidden, it does not mean it is right. This idea would certainly seem to apply
in this case. Ethical responsibility goes beyond the letter of the law to encompass the
idea of behaving in a certain way simply because it is the right thing to do. Students will
probably agree that the company failed to act in an ethical manner and that while it may
5-10
Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
Chapter 05 - Ethics in International Business
not have directly participated in the brutality against villagers, Unocal did have a
responsibility to oversee what was going on and ensure that people were treated fairly.
Summary
The closing case describes the deplorable working conditions at the Metai factory in China
that supplies computer parts directly to U.S. computer maker Dell, and indirectly to
Hewlett Packard and Microsoft. Workers at the factory work long hours doing monotonous
tasks and have just two days per month off. Wages are very low, and employees are
forbidden to converse, listen to music, or even take bathroom breaks while on the job.
When alerted to the conditions at the factory in early 2009, all three companies expressed
dismay and promised prompt investigations and appropriate action, however, by 2011, no
efforts to improve the situation for workers at the factory had been made. Discussion of
the case can revolve around the following questions.
QUESTION 1: What enables the owners of the Metai factory profiled in this case to get
away with such awful working conditions?
QUESTION 2: Should U.S. companies like Microsoft, Dell, and Hewlett-Packard be held
responsible for working conditions in foreign factories that they do not own, but where
subcontractors make products for them?
ANSWER 2: Students’ opinions will vary and should make for a lively class discussion.
Although U.S. companies have control over their own manufacturing facilities, when it
comes to outsourcing work to companies halfway around the world they walk a fine line
between manufacturing components that are profitable and making sure employees of
their overseas vendors are treated fairly. This question brings the concept of moral
dilemma into the discussion and how much pressure global companies can bring to bear
on companies that do work for them.
QUESTION 3: What labor standards regarding safety, working conditions, overtime, and
the like should U.S. companies hold foreign factories to: those prevailing in that country
or those prevailing in the United States?
5-11
Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
Chapter 05 - Ethics in International Business
QUESTION 4: Do you think the U.S. companies mentioned in this case need to make
changes to their current policies? If so, what? Should they make changes even if they
hinder their ability to compete in the marketplace?
ANSWER 4: U.S. companies have a responsibility to be sure foreign vendors are doing
their best to ensure employee safety. In this era of social media, one wrong move on the
part of a foreign vendor with regard to hazardous conditions in their facilities could cause
global companies to experience backlash from their customers with regard to turning a
blind eye to sweatshop conditions in which their products are manufactured. U.S.
companies need to balance their ability to produce products at reasonable costs with the
ability to monitor and correct any conditions that they deem hazardous.
INTEGRATING iGLOBES
There are several iGLOBE video clips that can be integrated with the material presented
in this chapter. In particular, you might consider the following:
Abstract: This video explores claims by garment workers in Cambodia that the
conditions in the factories in which they work and the wages they earn are substandard,
and responses, from customers including U.S. retailer GAP, to the allegations of human
rights violations.
Key Concepts: ethics, international labor rights, exports, global economy, global
production, competitive advantage, foreign investment, globalization, level of economic
development, human rights
Notes: Labor unrest in Cambodia is putting the spotlight once again on possible human
rights violations in the garment industry. Cambodian workers are claiming that their
working conditions are substandard, and that they are underpaid. The country’s booming
garment industry has grown from virtually nothing just 20 years ago, to a thriving
operation. Today, the country depends on the garment industry, and in particular garment
exports, for much of its revenue. Some 400,000 people work in 300 factories located in
or around Phnom Phen. The foreign-owned factories sell primarily to companies in
Europe and North America. Workers make about $61 per month. Now, however,
questions are being raised as to whether the country’s growth in the garment industry has
actually benefitted workers.
According to Ken Loo of Cambodia’s garment marketing association, the claims by the
workers are distorted. Ken Loo, who represents factory owners, believes that when
overtime pay is factored in, garment factory workers are actually paid closer to $91 per
5-12
Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
Chapter 05 - Ethics in International Business
month, and in fact out-earn many teachers, policemen, and civil servants. Ken Loo
worries that if there is too much pressure for higher wages, investors will simply switch
their operations to countries like Bangladesh were labor regulations are virtually
nonexistent.
Cambodia’s single biggest buyer of garments, U.S. retailer GAP, believes that the claims
of human rights violations are false. Indeed GAP spokesperson Bobbi Silten argues that
it was Cambodia’s strict ethical manufacturing standards that attracted GAP in the first
place. The country has been one of the firm’s top sourcing locations for the last decade.
Ken Loo challenges this claim though, noting that during the global recession, the
company shifted some of its sourcing to cheaper Bangladesh. In the end, the real issue
may come down to a basic debate between following ethically sound, but more costly
manufacturing processes versus providing goods at prices that are attractive to
consumers.
Answer: Workers in Cambodia claim they are being treated unfairly by their employers.
Allegations against factory owners include claims of long workdays, poor wages, and a
lack of health insurance and retirement benefits. Factory owners disagree with these
allegations claiming that workers are actually paid better than civil servants and
policemen. Moreover, they point out that workers are not forced to accept the jobs, they
can in fact, look elsewhere for better positions. Students will probably recognize that the
situation in Cambodia is not unlike that of many developing economies where people,
often young women, move to the city and take jobs in factories in order to support family
members in rural areas. Workers typically live in crowded rooms and endure long work
hours. Some students may point out though, that while these conditions are clearly not
optimal, it may not be the situation at the factory itself that is the issue, but rather the
problems in the rural areas where subsistence farming is the only option. In Cambodia
for example, garment workers are earning 40 percent more than national per capita GDP,
yet they are trying to support not only themselves, but entire families as well.
Answer: The garment industry is a vital part of Cambodia’s economy. Not only does the
industry employ some 400,000 Cambodians, it is also responsible for three of every four
dollars that come into the country. Yet, just two decades ago, the industry was
nonexistent. Many students will recognize that while the success of the industry is to be
commended, the growing dependence on a single industry puts the country in a
vulnerable position. Indeed, during the recent global recession, the country saw some of
5-13
Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
Chapter 05 - Ethics in International Business
its business being diverted to Bangladesh, a country where production is cheaper still.
Most students will probably suggest that Cambodia reduce its vulnerability by beginning
to diversify its industrial base by offering incentives to firms outside the garment industry
to invest.
3. Some people believe that pressure to increase wages for garment workers in Cambodia
will ultimately backfire as production moves elsewhere. Do you agree? Should garment
workers simply be happy they have a job?
4. What role do companies like GAP play in this situation? Do they bear any
responsibility for ensuring that workers are paid higher wages? Would you as a
consumer really be willing to pay more for clothes if it ensured that workers in another
country had a better standard of living?
Answer: U.S. retailer GAP has bought its garments from Cambodia for the last decade.
Today, the country is one of its top ten sourcing locations. According to spokeswoman
Bobbi Silten, the country’s strong ethical labor standards are a major factor in this
strategic decision. Most students will probably agree that companies do indeed bear
some responsibility for ensuring that the factories they buy from are complying not only
with local regulations, but also basic ethical standards. However, students may also note
that determining exactly what constitutes a fair wage can be difficult to determine. In
Cambodia for example, factory workers make as much or more than teachers and civil
servants. Many students will probably agree that for most people, price is an important
factor in a decision to purchase. If companies like GAP are forced to price their products
higher in because of higher wages, they could find that their own sales drop. Students
taking this perspective will probably suggest that while many consumers say that they
support higher wages and better working conditions for workers in developing
economies, their purchasing decisions do not always support their claims.
5-14
Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
Chapter 05 - Ethics in International Business
INTEGRATING VIDEOS
There are also several longer video clips that can be integrated with the material
presented in this chapter. In particular, you might consider the following from
International Business DVD Volume 6:
Learning Objectives
The purpose of this video is to help you:
❖ Explore corporate social responsibility for multinational companies.
❖ Identify problems associated with offshore manufacturing and the buyer-supplier
relationship.
❖ Recognize the impact of foreign companies on the host country.
❖ Understand how companies can incorporate social responsibility into their strategies.
Key Words
❖ Corporate ethics
❖ Corporate social responsibility
❖ Foreign direct investment
❖ Impact of the multinational company on the host country
❖ Globalization
Synopsis
An investigation by the London Sunday Times has revealed that tons of waste is being
illegally dumped on the outskirts of Maseru in Africa. Some of the illegal waste is
tagged with the names of companies like Gap and Levi Strauss. The waste is coming
from garment manufacturers that supply large well-known multinational companies.
Each day, dozens of very poor children search through the waste looking for anything of
value that they can sell. It is a dangerous process. Hidden among the scraps of fabric are
sharp razors and needles used in the manufacturing process. Moreover, a fire is
continually burning at the dump filling the air with acrid smoke that gives many children
chest infections. Chemicals are also being dumped. One woman claimed that she was
covered with sores after touching chemicals hidden in the waste.
The arrival of garment manufacturing to the area was supposed to have been a good thing
for the region. Indeed, contracts with companies like Gap and Levi Strauss created
thousands of new jobs in Lesotho. However, as a condition of being awarded a
manufacturing contract, the companies agreed to adhere to strict codes of social and
environmental responsibility, promises they have seemingly broken. At the textile mill
that supplies denim to Gap and Levi Strauss a broken pipe spills untreated bright blue
waste water into the water table. According to local residents, the pipe has been leaking
for years. One woman claims that the water smells terrible and makes people ill. An
5-15
Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
7, but it seems that there were four children in all. Those who write the more
common form of Suarez are more explicit, and deserve at least equal credit with
Gomara.
[68] Velazquez was married not long after his arrival in Cuba to the daughter of
Contador Cuéllar. The bride died within the same week. Herrera, dec. i. lib. ix. cap.
ix. ‘Velazquez fauoreciala por amor de otra su hermana, q̄ tenia ruin fama, y aun
el era demasiado mugeril.’ Gomara, Hist. Mex., 7. Delaporte, Reisen, x. 141-2,
assumes that Cortés won the love of her whom Velazquez wished to possess;
while Gordon, Anc. Mex., ii. 32, supposes that the bride had been the object of
Velazquez’ gallantry; hence the trouble. Folsom, on the other hand, marries one of
the Suarez sisters to Velazquez, and calls him the brother-in-law of Cortés.
Cortés, Despatches, 9, 11-12.
[69] Gomara, Hist. Mex., 7, insists that Velazquez had no motive for anger except
the refusal of Cortés to marry. The meeting of conspirators at his house gave
plausibility to the charges of his enemies. By others it is even stated that at these
meetings Cortés defended the governor against the charges of the conspirators
and overruled their plots. De Rebus Gestis Ferdinandi Cortesii, in Icazbalceta, Col.
Doc., i. 325-6. The preponderance of evidence, however, is against this
supposition.
[70] ‘Estando para se embarcar en una canoa de indios con sus papeles, fué
Diego Velazquez avisado y hízolo prender y quísolo ahorcar.’ Las Casas, Hist.
Ind., iv. 11. He was cast in the fort prison, lest the army should proclaim him
general. ‘Timebat ne si quis,’ etc. De Rebus Gestis Ferdinandi Cortesii, in
Icazbalceta, Col. Doc., i. 325 and 326-7.
[72] ‘Cortés ... tuuo por cierto q̄ lo embiariã a santo Domingo o a España.’
Gomara, Hist. Mex., 7. There would have been no reasons for his fears on this
score, if he possessed papers implicating Velazquez, as Gomara states. Another
version is that the alcaldes imposed a heavy sentence on Cortés, after his
capture, and that Velazquez, on being appealed to by Duero and others, was
noble-minded enough to grant a pardon. He discharged him from his service,
however, and had him placed on board a ship for Española. Torquemada, i. 348.
Herrera says that Catalina lived near the church, and while Cortés was making
love to her an alguacil named Juan Escudero, whom Cortés afterward hanged in
Mexico, came up behind him and pinioned his arms, while the soldiers rushed to
his assistance. Dec. i. lib. ix. cap. ix.; Cortés, Residencia, i. 63, etc. Las Casas,
Hist. Ind., iv. 11; De Rebus Gestis Ferdinandi Cortesii, in Icazbalceta, i. 327-8, give
minutely the mode of capture.
[73] Broke the pump and crawled through, ‘Organum pneumaticum,’ etc. De
Rebus Gestis Ferdinandi Cortesii, in Icazbalceta, Col. Doc., i. 329.
[74] The current of the Macaguanigua River did not allow him to enter it, and
elsewhere the breakers would upset the boat. Stripping himself, he tied to his
head certain documents against Velazquez, held by him as notary of the
ayuntamiento and clerk of the treasurer, and thereupon swam ashore. He entered
his house, consulted with Juan Suarez, and reëntered the temple, armed.
Gomara, Hist. Mex., 7. De Rebus Gestis Ferdinandi Cortesii, in Icazbalceta, vi.
329-30, refers to a friend of Cortés chained in the same ship’s hold, and states
that Cortés rowed ashore. On the way to the house of Suarez he narrowly
escapes a patrol. Having secured arms, he proceeds to cheer his captive
partisans, and then enters the sanctuary. At dawn the captain of the vessel from
which Cortés escaped comes also to the temple, to secure himself against
Velazquez’ wrath, no doubt, but is refused admission into the sacristy by his
fellow-refugee, who suspects the man, and fears that the provisions may not
outlast the siege. In Herrera, dec. i. lib. ix. cap. viii., Cortés drifts about on a log
and is finally cast ashore.
[75] So the story was current at the time, and I doubt not it contains some degree
of truth, notwithstanding Las Casas, Hist. Ind., iv. 11-12, scouts it as a pure
fabrication. He knew both men; Velazquez as a proud chief, exacting the deepest
reverence from those around him, and making them tremble at his frown; while
Cortés was in those days so lowly and humble as to be glad to curry favor with the
meanest servants of the governor. The good bishop is evidently prejudiced. In De
Rebus Gestis Ferdinandi Cortesii, in Icazbalceta, Col. Doc., i. 332-4, the facts are
a little elaborated and contradictory, as usual. Cortés escapes the guard round the
church, and reaches the farm. ‘Halloh, señores!’ he shouts, ‘Cortés is at the door,
and salutes Señor Velazquez, his excellent and gallant captain.’ Velazquez is
astonished, yet pleased, at the arrival of one whom he always had regarded as a
friend and beloved brother. He orders supper and bed to be prepared; but Cortés
insists that none shall approach, or he will lance them. He demands to know what
complaints there are against him. He abhors the suspicion of being a traitor, and
will clear himself. ‘Receive me,’ he concludes, ‘in your favor with the same good
faith that I return to it.’ ‘Now I believe,’ answers Velazquez, ‘that you regard as
highly my name and fame as your own loyalty.’ They shake hands, and Cortés
now enters the house to fully explain the misunderstanding. After supper they
retire to one bed. In the morning the messenger, Diego Orellana, arrives to
announce Cortés’ flight, and finds them lying side by side. Cortés will not proceed
with the expedition just then; but after arranging his affairs he joins, to the delight
of the general, who follows his advice implicitly, as he had done in former
campaigns. After their victorious return Cortés enjoys greater honors than ever.
Peralta, who also gives the story at length, states that Cortés surprised Velazquez
asleep. At the request of the governor he gave himself up to the jailer in order to
be formally released. Nat. Hist., 58-62. Still Peralta is a little confused.
[76] She was received by Cortés in Mexico, after the conquest, with great
distinction; but died in about three months after her arrival.
[77] Las Casas, who, as usual, will have a fling at Cortés, writes: ‘Tuvo Cortés un
hijo ó hija, no sé si en su mujer, y suplicó á Diego Velazquez que tuviese por bien
de se lo sacar de la pila en el baptismo y ser su compadre, lo que Diego
Velazquez aceptó, por honralle.’ Hist. Ind., iv. 13. Among Cortés’ children a natural
daughter by a Cuban Indian is mentioned, Bernal Diaz, Hist. Verdad., 238, but it is
not likely that Cortés would ask the governor to stand godfather to a natural child.
The same writer makes Velazquez the groomsman or sponsor at the marriage.
‘Fue su padrino, quando Cortés se velò con Doña Catalina;’ Id., 13; Vetancvrt,
Teatro Mex., pt. iii. 109. Although compadre is not unfrequently used as a mere
term of friendship, it is not likely to have been applied by a marriage padrino;
hence the title of co-father indicates that it originated at the font.
[78] An office granted only to men of note and to leading conquistadores. Solis,
Hist. Mex., i. 46. It conveyed the title of ‘muy virtuoso señor,’ the governor being
called ‘muy magnífico señor,’ Pacheco and Cárdenas, Col. Doc., xii. 225, and
permitted the holder to walk side by side with the governor. Herrera, dec. ii. lib. iii.
cap. xii. ‘Auia sido dos vezes Alcalde en la Villa de Sãtiago de Boroco, adõde era
vezino: porque en aquestas tierras se tiene por mucha honra.’ Bernal Diaz, Hist.
Verdad., 13. He does not refer to him as alcalde at Santiago de Cuba, where the
fleet is fitting out, as he clearly states. Gomara, Hist. Mex., 4, mentions merely that
he was here before the quarrel with Velazquez. Some writers assume that
Santiago de Cuba is the same as Santiago de Baracoa, but Herrera, loc. cit., and
others, observe the distinction.
CHAPTER V.
SAILING OF THE EXPEDITION.
1518-1519.
I regret having to spoil a good story; but the truth is, the drama
reported by Bartolomé Las Casas, and reiterated by Herrera and
Prescott, was never performed. It tells how Cortés put to sea,
Prescott asserts the very night after the jester’s warning; and that in
the morning, when the governor, early roused from his bed, rushed
down to the landing with all the town at his heels, Cortés returned
part way in an armed boat and bandied words with him. Beside
being improbable, almost impossible, this version is not sustained by
the best authorities.[88] The fact is, some time elapsed, after the
suspicions of the governor had first been aroused, before the sailing
of the fleet, during which interval Grijalva with his ships returned.
Gomara states that Velazquez sought to break with Cortés and
send only Grijalva’s vessels, with another commander; but to this
Láres and Duero, whose advice was asked by the governor, made
strong objection, saying that Cortés and his friends had spent too
much money now to abandon the enterprise, which was very true;
for like the appetite of Angaston which came with eating, the more
Cortés tasted the sweets of popularity and power, the more stomach
he had for the business. And the more the suspicions of the
governor grew, the greater were the captain-general’s assurances of
devotion, and the firmer became the determination of Cortés and his
followers to prosecute this adventure, in which they had staked their
all.[89]
Warned by Láres and Duero of every plot, Cortés hurried
preparations, sending friends to forage, and shipping stores with the
utmost despatch, meanwhile giving secret orders for all to be ready
to embark at a moment’s notice. Finally, the hour having come, on
the evening of the 17th of November, with a few trusty adherents,
Cortés presented himself before the governor, and politely took his
leave. It fell suddenly on Velazquez, in whose eyes all movements
relating to the expedition had of late become the manœuvres of men
conspired to overreach him. But having neither the excuse nor the
ability to stop the expedition he let the officers depart.
By playing with the devil one soon learns to play the devil. From
the governor’s house Cortés hastened to the public meat depository,
seized and added to his stores the town’s next week’s supply, and
left the keeper, Fernando Alfonso, a gold chain, all he had remaining
wherewith to make payment.[90] It was a dull, dry, gray November
morning, the 18th, very early, after mass had been said, when the
squadron, consisting of six vessels, sailed out of Santiago harbor
amidst the vivas of the populace and the inward cursings of the
governor.[91] But of little avail was Velazquez’ remorse; for Cortés
carried no Æolian wind-bags to drive him back from his destination.
FOOTNOTES
[79] ‘Fray Luys de Figueroa, fray Alonso de santo Domingo, y fray Bernaldino
Mãçenedo, q̄ eran los gouernadores, dieron la licencia para Fernando Cortés
como capitan y armador cõ Diego Velazquez.’ Gomara, Hist. Mex., 12. The
Fathers no doubt required to know the name of the commander. ‘His litteris
Cortesius confirmatus,’ is the statement in De Rebus Gestis Ferdinandi Cortesii, in
Icazbalceta, Col. Doc., i. 344, in reference to their permit. This authority intimates
that Salcedo, at a later date probably, obtained license from the Fathers for
warfare in Yucatan and for the settlement of the mainland, but this is not confirmed
anywhere. Id., 350.
[80] Evidently Velazquez desired his captains to disobey instructions and colonize.
He could not officially authorize them to do so, not having as yet received
permission from Spain. Neither Velazquez nor Cortés had any intention in this
instance of confining this enterprise to trade, or protecting the natives, or imposing
morality upon the men. It was well understood by all that licentiousness and
plunder were to be the reward for perils to be undergone. ‘Atque etiam quod
Grijalvae prætentâ causa auxilii ferendi quod Alvaradus postulabat, ire licebat,’ is
the pointed observation in De Rebus Gestis Ferdinandi Cortesii, in Icazbalceta,
Col. Doc., i. 343-4. Bernal Diaz, Hist. Verdad., 13, refers to promises of Indian
repartimientos in the new regions as an inducement for volunteers. Cortés’
statement at Vera Cruz, that he had no order to settle, means nothing in view of
the motives then actuating him. Secret agreements between governors and
lieutenants for defrauding the crown and promoting their own aims were only too
common; and this is overlooked by those who trust merely to the instructions for
arguments on this point.
[81] The full text of the instructions is to be found in Pacheco and Cárdenas, Col.
Doc., xii. 225-46; Col. Doc. Inéd., i. 385, 406; Alaman, Disert., i. App. ii. 1-27, with
notes, reproduced in Zamacois, Hist. Méj., ii. 791-815. The Muñoz copy, given in
Prescott’s Mex., iii. 434-9, preserved the original spelling in the preamble, but the
clauses are abbreviated, though Prescott does not appear to be aware of it.
[82] The ownership of the expedition has been a moot question, some authors
regarding it as pertaining chiefly to Velazquez, while others accord it wholly to
Cortés and his friends. According to Gomara, after receiving the vessel brought by
Alvarado, and another provided by Velazquez, Cortés, aided by his friends, bought
two large and two small vessels before leaving Santiago; and at least two more
were bought after this with bills forced upon the owners. The rest of the fleet
appears to have been made up from the transport spoken of and from Grijalva’s
vessels. The latter is to be regarded as Velazquez’ contribution, for in the
testimony before the royal council in Spain, Montejo, the trusted friend of the
commander, declares that on delivering them over to the governor he received the
order to join Cortés, with the vessels, of course. His statements, and those of the
captain Puertocarrero, confirmed by the letter of the ayuntamiento of Villa Rica to
the emperor, agree that, from their own observations and the accounts given by
others, Cortés must have contributed not only seven vessels, but expended over
5000 castellanos on the outfit, beside procuring goods and provisions, while
Velazquez furnished only one third, chiefly in clothes, provisions, wines, and other
effects, which he sold through an agent to the company, the witnesses included, at
exorbitant prices. Montejo had heard that Velazquez contributed three vessels, but
whether these were exclusive of Grijalva’s fleet is not clear. He is also supposed to
have lent Cortés 2000 castellanos, and to have given twelve or thirteen hundred
loads of bread, and 300 tocinos, beside 1800 castellanos in goods, to be sold to
the party at high prices. Every other supply was furnished by Cortés, who
maintained the whole force without touching the ship’s stores, while remaining in
Cuba, no doubt. Col. Doc. Inéd., i. 487-90. Puertocarrero adds that Cortés’
liberality to men in advancing means and outfits was generally admitted. He
himself had received a horse from the commander. He gives a list of the
outrageously high prices charged by Velazquez for his supplies. Id., 491-5.
Another member of the expedition states that Cortés furnished seven vessels, and
Velazquez three, two more belonging to the latter joining the fleet afterward.
Cortés paid for all the outfit. Extract appended to Carta del Ayunt. de V. Cruz, in
Col. Doc. Inéd., i. 419-20: ‘Casi las dos partes ... á su (Cortés) costa, asi en
navios como en bastimentos de mar.’ ‘Todo el concierto de la dicha armada se
hizo á voluntad de dicho Diego Velazquez, aunque ni puso ni gastó él mas de la
tercia parte de ella.... La mayor parte de la dicha tercia parte ... fué emplear sus
dineros en vinos y en ropas y en otras cosas de poco valor para nos lo vender acá
(V. Cruz) en mucha mas cantidad de lo que á él le costó.’ Carta de la Justicia de
Veracruz, 10 de julio, 1519, in Cortés, Cartas, 8; Pacheco and Cárdenas, Col.
Doc., xiv. 37. Claiming to have no ready money of his own, Velazquez took for the
expedition 1000 castellanos from the estate of Narvaez in his charge. Gomara,
Hist. Mex., 12-13. ‘Salió de la Isla de Cuba ... con quince navíos suyos.’ Cortés,
Memorial, 1542, in Cortés, Escritos Sueltos, 310. Peter Martyr assumes that
Cuban colonists furnished the fleet with the governor’s consent, and elected
Cortés commander. Dec. iv. cap. vi. Solis, Hist. Mex., i. 61, considers that
Velazquez held only a minor share in the expedition. Montejo stated in a general
way that he spent all his fortune on joining the expedition. Cent. Am., 1554-55,
127-30, in Squiers MS. In De Rebus Gestis Ferdinandi Cortesii it is asserted that
Cortés expended 6000 pesos of his own, and 6000 ducats borrowed money,
beside what Velazquez lent him; his expenditures being in all 15,000 pesos.
Velazquez gave not one real, but merely sold goods at exorbitant figures, or made
advances at a high interest, even the vessels provided by him being transferred to
the commander under an expensive charter. ‘Sunt pretereà, multi Hispani viri boni
qui et nunc vivunt, et qui cum ea classis de qua agimus, apparabatur, aderant. Hi
in hujus causæ defensione, cujus apud Consilium Regium Indicum Cortesius est
accusatus, testes jurati asserunt Velazquium nihil omnino ex propriâ facultate in
Cortesii classem impendisse.’ This would indicate that Montejo and
Puertocarrero’s testimony was confirmed by many others. The agent, Juan Diaz,
who attended to the sale of the goods and the collection of the advances, fell in
the retreat from Mexico, and his money was lost. Icazbalceta, Col. Doc., i. 345-9.
This testimony by members of the expedition merits the foremost attention in the
question, particularly since the fewer statements on the other side are based
wholly on supposition. It is somewhat qualified, however, by the consideration that
both Montejo and Puertocarrero were stanch friends of Cortés, and that the letter
of the ayuntamiento was prepared in his presence. It must also be borne in mind
that a goodly proportion of the share attributed to him consisted of vessels and
effects obtained upon his credit as captain-general of the fleet, and also in a semi-
piratical manner. The statements in Cortés, Memorial, and in De Rebus Gestis
Ferdinandi Cortesii, indicate, beside, a hardly warranted attempt to regard
Velazquez’ contribution chiefly as a loan to the commander or to the party, his
vessels being spoken of as chartered. Another proportion belonged to wealthy
volunteers. On the whole, however, it may be concluded that Cortés could lay
claim to a larger share in the expedition than Velazquez; but the latter possessed
the title of being not only the discoverer, through his captains, of the regions to be
conquered, but the projector of the expedition. Oviedo, while believing that the
fleet belonged with more right to the governor, feels no pity for the treatment he
received, in view of his own conduct to Diego Colon. Complacently he cites the
proverb: ‘Matarás y matarte han: y matarán quien te matare.’ As you do unto
others, so shall be done unto you. Oviedo asserts that he has seen testimony
showing that Cortés and his men did not sail at their own expense, but from his
own statement it appears that the instructions of Velazquez, wherein he speaks of
the expedition as sent in his name, is the chief feature in this so-called testimony;
i. 538-9. Las Casas naturally sides with Velazquez, and estimates that he
expended over 20,000 castellanos; he had no need for, nor would he have
stooped to a partnership, at least with a man like Cortés. Hist. Ind., iv. 448.
Herrera, dec. ii. lib. iii. cap. xi., copies this, and Torquemada, i. 359, reverses this
figure in favor of Cortés.
[83] Testimonio de Puertocarrero, in Col. Doc. Inéd., i. 491. ‘Mãdo dar pregones, y
tocar sus atambores, y trompetas en nombre de su Magestad, y en su Real
nombre por Diego Velazquez para que qualesquier personas que quisiessen ir en
su compañía à las tierras nuevamente descubiertas â los conquistar y doblar, les
darian sus partes del oro plata, y joyas que se huviesse, y encomiendas de Indios
despues de pacificada.’ Bernal Diaz, Hist. Verdad., 13. Mark here the promise of
encomiendas to the volunteers. The word ‘doblar’ doubtless meant to explore or to
sail round the new islands. Bernal Diaz does not fail to observe that the royal
license had not yet arrived to warrant these proclamations.
[84] See Landa, Rel. de Yuc., 23; Tapia, Rel., in Icazbalceta, Col. Doc., ii. 554;
Fancourt, Hist. Yuc., 27, leaves out the middle sentence; Gomara, Hist. Mex., 15;
Torquemada, i. 364, and others give only the Spanish translation. Prescott says
the flag was of velvet, and attributes the sign to the labarum of Constantine, which,
to say the least, is somewhat far-fetched. Bernal Diaz, Hist. Verdad., 13, places
the motto upon ‘estandartes, y vanderas labradas de oro cõ las armas Reales, y
una Cruz de cada parte, juntamente con las armas de nuestro Rey.’
[85] ‘Se puso vn penacho de plumas con su medalla de oro.’ Bernal Diaz, Hist.
Verdad., 13. ‘Tomo casa. Hizo Mesa. Y començo a yr con armas, y mucha
compañía. De que muchos murmurauan, diziendo que tenia estado sin señorio.’
Gomara, Hist. Mex., 13.
[87] Las Casas, Hist. Ind., iv. 450-1; Herrera, dec. ii. lib. iii. cap. xi. Bernal Diaz,
Hist. Verdad., 13, relates the incident as having occurred on the way to Sunday
mass. The fool, whom he calls Cervantes, was walking in front of his master and
Cortés, uttering nonsense in prose and rhyme; finally he said in a louder voice, ‘By
my faith, master Diego, a nice captain have you chosen: one who will run away
with the fleet, I warrant, for he has courage and enterprise.’ Duero, who walked