Title: Mastering the Art of Literature Review: Simple Rules for Success

Embarking on the journey of writing a literature review can be a daunting task for many. It requires a
meticulous approach, in-depth analysis, and a comprehensive understanding of the existing body of
knowledge. Here are some simple rules to guide you through the intricate process of crafting an
effective literature review.

Rule 1: Define Your Scope

Begin by clearly defining the scope and purpose of your literature review. Determine the specific
research question or topic you aim to address, and establish the boundaries of your review. This step
is crucial for maintaining focus and relevance throughout the writing process.

Rule 2: Thorough Research

Conduct extensive research to identify relevant literature that contributes to your chosen topic.
Utilize academic databases, journals, books, and other reputable sources to gather a diverse range of
perspectives. Be prepared to invest time in this phase, as a comprehensive understanding of existing
research forms the foundation of a successful literature review.

Rule 3: Organize and Synthesize

Organize the literature in a coherent manner, grouping similar studies and identifying key themes and
trends. Aim to synthesize the information, highlighting the relationships and connections between
different sources. This process requires a critical evaluation of each study's methodology, findings,
and contributions to the field.

Rule 4: Engage in Critical Analysis

Don't shy away from critically analyzing the literature. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of
each study, and identify any gaps or contradictions in the existing research. A well-rounded literature
review involves more than just summarizing; it requires a thoughtful critique of the methodologies
and conclusions presented in the reviewed studies.

Rule 5: Provide a Clear Structure

Ensure your literature review follows a clear and logical structure. Typically, it includes an
introduction, the main body with organized sections, and a conclusion that summarizes key findings.
A well-structured review enhances readability and helps readers navigate through the wealth of
information presented.

The Difficulty of Crafting a Literature Review

Writing a literature review demands time, dedication, and a high level of academic expertise. Many
find the process challenging due to its complexity and the need for a nuanced understanding of
research methodologies. If you find yourself struggling with this task, consider seeking professional
assistance.

Why Choose ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔?

⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers a reliable solution for individuals grappling with the complexities of
literature review writing. Our team of experienced writers understands the nuances of academic
research and can craft a literature review that meets the highest standards. Save time and ensure the
quality of your work by entrusting your literature review to the experts at ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔.

For expertly crafted literature reviews, visit StudyHub.vip ⇔">⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ and take the
stress out of your academic writing journey.
Before beginning to draft your literature review, you should be aware of the various formats into
which you can structure your literature review to the best extent possible. Does your introduction
clearly convey the purpose of the literature review. Rule 10: Be Up-to-Date, but Do Not Forget
Older Studies. This square may be circled by discussing the wider implications of the reviewed topic
for other disciplines. Conducting the Literature Review The conduct of the review must strictly
follow the protocol that was developed. Perform information synthesis Once the data has been
extracted, it must be synthesized in a way that answers the research questions. Plenty of information
mentioned years ago remains relevant, so it’s better not to miss it. Some graduate schools are now
offering courses in reviewing the literature, given that most research students start. Click the target
next to the incorrect Subject Area and let us know. You need to make sure that you are aware of the
debates and counter arguments associated with your topic as well. Usually, in a literature review,
you draw boundaries with the help of others’ work to support yours. This step is very well adhered
to when the literature review is for a dissertation or thesis, that is, the formulation of a question. This
article has been cited by other articles in PMC. Out of the selected literature, you will be required to
conduct further filtration by selecting the most appropriate one. Are there any gaps in the literature
that need more research. Research Methods in Architecture - Literature Review - ????? ???????? -. It
is challenging to achieve a successfulreview on all these fronts. After having taken notes while
reading the literature, you will have a rough idea of the amount of material available. Therefore, if
you want to nail this section of your research paper, you need to read it extensively. It is necessary to
review the sources in order to demonstrate a thorough critical analysis. Editage Insights (Resources
for authors and journals) Research Methods for the Behavioral Sciences 5th Edition Gravetter
Solutions. An article review is both a summary and an evaluation of another writer’s article. In
general, a review of the literature should neither be a public relations brochure nor an exercise in
competitive self-. For such summaries to be useful, however, they need to be compiled in a
professional. Be sure that you start with your General Field first before referring to your dissertation
study. Please explain the purpose of writing a testimonial and the significance of the subject. Like a
well-baked cake, a good review has a number of telling features: it is worth the reader's time, timely.
The “experiential” part of the rubric does not mean that you must bring in your experience and voice
throughout the work, but rather provide context to the topic, mainly in the introduction. How can
you organize the flow of the main body of the review so that the reader will be drawn into and
guided. To ensure the completeness of your review, we advise that you combine the three strategies
and utilize more than one digital library.
However, traditional literature reviews are susceptible to a number of biases during the identification,
selection, and synthesis of included studies (e.g., publication bias, selection bias, and vote counting).
Niranjan Chavan skeletal system details with joints and its types skeletal system details with joints
and its types Minaxi patil. But you need to put a comparative table and scheme to make your
presentation more understanding. Data synthesis Reporting the review Explaining how results will
be displayed sorting the data Writing the results and their interpretation Evaluating the results
Threats to Study Validity Conclusion References Appendices Conclusion Finally, we recommend
that you read the references and examples of systematic reviews we have selected below to learn
more about this type of literature review, as this article is not intended to be a complete guide. You
can either do it by going through each section or complete the whole chapter and then review it
once. Ideas and insights also come from discussions with coauthors and colleagues, as well as
feedback from reviewers and editors. Unleashing the Power of AI Tools for Enhancing Research,
International FDP on. There are so many issues in contemporary science that you could spend a
lifetime of attending conferences and reading the literature just pondering what to review.
Sometimes individuals must meet them adequately, understand the difficulties and determine their
main priorities, deciding what to examine and how to start writing. A mini-review is not necessarily
a minor review: it may well attract more attention from busy readers, although it will inevitably
simplify some issues and leave out some relevant material due to space limitations. The selection of
an appropriate theme and relevant literature calls for mastery of language and knowledge. Look for
sources that are credible and avoid using shady sites. This square may be circled by discussing the
wider implications of. An interesting approach for when we have a large amount of primary studies
is to have a researcher to extract data and another to check the data that has already been extracted.
However, it’s also essential to remember examples of older studies and keep the balance between
them and the newer research. Ideally, a literature review should not identify as a major. Given the
progressive acceleration in the publication of scientific papers,today's reviews of the literature need.
There are usually four variations of literature review structures available beforehand. A conceptual
diagram of the need for different types of literature reviews depending on the amount of published
research papers and literature reviews. This is the case not just at the writing stage, but also for
readers if the diagram is included in the review as a figure. It it crucial as a part of your qualifying
exams and the accompanying literature reviews that you elaborate on the context of the studies being
cited. Read the guidelines for a literature review in research. Therefore, in the beginning, always
define your topic properly so that the audience knows what to expect. The scope of the testimony
will cover various aspects of the issue. However, in case you are not able to sort your literature
review, we recommend you to use our assignment help service anytime. Although having articles
with tips and recommendations is good, the presence of an accurate sample is much better. It is
important to be careful in noting the references already at this stage, so as to avoid misattributions.
In contrast to the non-systematic process, the systematic review is done in a formal and meticulous
manner. It is however advisable to reread the draft one more time before submission, as a last-minute
correction of typos, leaps, and muddled sentences may enable the reviewers to focus on providing
advice on the content rather than the form. Your literature review document must adhere to
academic writing standards and excellent grammatical expertise.
Digital Sales Sell your publications commission-free as single issues or ongoing subscriptions. Data
synthesis Reporting the review Explaining how results will be displayed sorting the data Writing the
results and their interpretation Evaluating the results Threats to Study Validity Conclusion
References Appendices Conclusion Finally, we recommend that you read the references and
examples of systematic reviews we have selected below to learn more about this type of literature
review, as this article is not intended to be a complete guide. When you start your search, you will
come across many studies on your chosen topic or a similar topic. What evidence has led to a
particular claim being made. For both of the aforementioned purposes, the steps to write a literature
review remain the same. From proactively monitoring and fixing your system remotely to enabling
you to reset your own system easily, we have you covered. Tell us a little about why you would like
to join BIBA (300 word or less) Attach Resume ( Optional ) Max. This article has been cited by
other articles in PMC. Many individuals tend to procrastinate when it comes to completing
assignments.Make sure to attend to your paper on a daily basis.Please adhere to the guidelines given
to you by your instructor.Please use the appropriate citation style and provide the required number of
sources.It is important to have confidence in your literature review.Minor errors can have significant
consequences when it comes to quality. Here, developments and trends that have occurred over a
range of periods across the topic are highlighted. They determine what information will be extracted
from the articles that will be analyzed, which we call primary studies. However, it is likely that most
scientists have not thought in detail about how to approach and carry out a literature review.
Systematic reviews, pioneered in medicine and translated into conservation in 2006, address these
issues through a strict methodology that aims to maximize transparency, objectivity, and
repeatability. Backing your arguments with appropriate references enhances the quality of your paper
as it becomes reliable and credible. It should give a theoretical base for the research and help you
(the author) determine the nature of your research. Unleashing the Power of AI Tools for Enhancing
Research, International FDP on. This is of course going to impact the results of the research. You can
simply bookmark and save the websites that you want to refer to while writing your dissertation.
Provide, in a brief and concise way, the context of the study. Tree endophytes can contribute to
biological control of infectious diseases, enhance tolerance to environmental stress or behave as
opportunistic weak pathogens potentially competing with more harmful ones. Add Links Send
readers directly to specific items or pages with shopping and web links. Have you included and
addressed the question that this literature review tries to answer. All discussions from your chosen
studies should be referenced and included in the list of sources. Statistics Make data-driven
decisions to drive reader engagement, subscriptions, and campaigns. To find out more, including how
to control cookies, see here. Inevitably, new papers on the reviewed topic (including independently
written literature reviews) will appear from. However, this does not mean that your literature review
cannot talk about past researches. Thanks to all the technological advancements, you don’t have to
write things down the traditional way anymore. A solution can be to involve a set of complementary
coauthors: some people are excellent at mapping what has been achieved, some others are very good
at identifying dark clouds on the horizon, and some have instead a knack at predicting where
solutions are going to come from. How can someone crest a gap using the researchers words after
analysing the literature.
After having taken notes while reading the literature, you will have a rough idea of the amount of
material available. Here, find out information about selecting a creative literature However, if you
are writing a review in the humanities, history, or social sciences, a survey of the history of the
literature may be what is needed, because what is important is how perspectives have changed
through the years or within a certain time period. Your study will lose its authenticity and credibility
as a lot of irrelevant concepts will be included. The scope of the testimony will cover various aspects
of the issue. After that, there is an option to highlight the key points and give recommendations for
future studies or research. That is, you will write a document about your review, which could be an
article, chapter of your TCC, etc. A systematic literature review is one of the types of literature
review that aims to summarize all existing information about a phenomenon in an impartial and
complete manner. Depending on the volume of studies captured in the previous step, we look at the
title and abstract of these studies in order to eliminate irrelevant studies. It should not feel like a
glorified annotated bibliography. ( ). This will allow you to use your time effectively and maintain a
consistent research publication schedule.If your thesis contains sufficient data, it may be beneficial to
transform it into a comprehensive literature review paper with additional effort.To create a literature
review article, incorporate relevant topics into your research that pertain to a specific problem area.
Help Center Here you'll find an answer to your question. The literature review acknowledges the
work of previous researchers, and in so doing, assures the reader that your work has been well
conceived. This summarizes the concluding thoughts derived from the testimonials. A conceptual
diagram of the need for different types of literature reviews depending on the amount of. Moreover,
outlining allows you to learn specific things about your chosen sources. Extract information from
primary studies We must identify and capture information from each primary study. Consequently,
your dissertation will turn out to be strong and note-worthy. In-Salon Education In-School Education
Which Salons have you worked for. DevGAMM Conference Barbie - Brand Strategy Presentation
Barbie - Brand Strategy Presentation Erica Santiago Good Stuff Happens in 1:1 Meetings: Why you
need them and how to do them well Good Stuff Happens in 1:1 Meetings: Why you need them and
how to do them well Saba Software Introduction to C Programming Language Introduction to C
Programming Language Simplilearn The Pixar Way: 37 Quotes on Developing and Maintaining a
Creative Company (fr. It is not just a descriptive list of the material available, or a set of summaries.
An interesting approach for when we have a large amount of primary studies is to have a researcher
to extract data and another to check the data that has already been extracted. To make it possible, we
recommend that you check the plagiarism on your own. Going through your work right after you
have finished writing is not a good idea. Funding: This work was funded by the French Foundation
for Research on Biodiversity (FRB) through its Centre for Synthesis and Analysis of Biodiversity
data (CESAB), as part of the NETSEED research project. Tree endophytes can contribute to
biological control of infectious diseases, enhance tolerance to environmental stress or behave as
opportunistic weak pathogens potentially competing with more harmful ones. However, ensure the
right balance between being concise and being descriptive. Taking notes will help you in assembling
the material that you have gathered for the purpose of future reference. Some journals are now
favouring the publication of rather short reviews focusing on the last few years, with a limit on the
number of words and citations. To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here. This
step is very important as this protocol will determine how all research will be conducted.
While using this approach, the person must avoid the bare posting of chronological events and
instead focus more on improvising the style of the contents mentioned period-wise. Literature
reviews are in great demand in most scientific fields. If there are already a few or several reviews of
the literature on your issue, my advice is not to give up, but to carry on with your own literature
review. Various studies relevant to forest pathology in a changing world are accumulating, thus
making it necessary to provide an update of recent literature. Reading entirely through all the
available literature in detail is certainly a time-consuming activity, and it tends to create an
unnecessary fuss. Hence, it is paramount for one to follow the necessary guidelines for writing a
literature review that appeals to an evaluator for academic appreciation and remains focused on the
research procedures. Related. This implies that literature reviewers would do well to keep an eye on
electronic lists of papers in press, given that it can take months before these appear in scientific
databases. Articles Get discovered by sharing your best content as bite-sized articles. It is common
in some areas of research that the abstract (or abstract) has little or poor quality information. It
should give a theoretical base for the research and help you (the author) determine the nature of your
research. If there are already a few or several reviews of the. It it crucial as a part of your qualifying
exams and the accompanying literature reviews that you elaborate on the context of the studies being
cited. For this you have to reflect and try to answer the following questions: Is the research area
mature enough, with a lot of published studies. ABDC is an acronym used for Australian Business
Deans Council which has created a journal quality list according to which the journals have been
ranked and rated as per their authority and the universities require the students to reference the
literature review on the basis of ABDC ranking. For such summaries to be useful, however, they
need to be compiled in a professional. After that, there is an option to highlight the key points and
give recommendations for future studies or research. Ideas and insights also come from discussions
with coauthors and colleagues, as well as feedback from reviewers and editors. Given that you are
presenting what the literature says about a field of study, not what you think or believe, you must
cite those authors that actually make and provide the research evidence, theories, frameworks for
practice etc. Holding degrees in more than 50 subjects, they know how to create masterpieces. A
ready-made example of literature review helps to know how to get started properly without
straggling with irrelevant information and searching through tons of unnecessary materials. Usually,
it’s unnecessary, but if an abstract is mentioned in the requirements, consider adding it to the working
plan. However, it is likely that most scientists have not thought in detail about how to approach and
carry out a literature review. You can even challenge assumptions or explanations that have been
provided by authors and provide your rationale for doing so. In this contribution, I share ten simple
rules I learned working on about 25 literature reviews as a PhD and postdoctoral student. To ensure
the completeness of your review, we advise that you combine the three strategies and utilize more
than one digital library. The same point applies to the dichotomy of descriptive vs. However, bias
could also occur in the other direction: some scientists may be unduly dismissive of their own
achievements, so that they will tend to downplay their contribution (if any) to a field when
reviewing it. This way, by the time you have read the literature you selected, you will. If you find the
article relevant, then the next step should be to scroll through the “ literature review ” section of the
article and read through it. Now, you cannot draw boundaries without telling your audience about the
area that you are working on.
In this study, we explored the availability and characteristics of the assisting tools for the peer-
reviewing process. Find out how you can submit a well written and perfectly formatted MLA
literature review with our professional help and advice. Once defined in the planning phase, these
issues cannot be changed in the following phases. Including material just for the sake of it can easily
lead to reviews that are trying to do too many things at once. Be sure that you start with your
General Field first before referring to your dissertation study. This implies that literature reviewers
would do well to keep an eye on electronic lists of papers in press, given that it can take months
before these appear in scientific databases. When systematic reviews analyse quantitative results in
a. IMPORTANT: Each digital library’s search engine works in a specific way. Unleashing the Power
of AI Tools for Enhancing Research, International FDP on. ABDC is an acronym used for Australian
Business Deans Council which has created a journal quality list according to which the journals have
been ranked and rated as per their authority and the universities require the students to reference the
literature review on the basis of ABDC ranking. However, a general introduction of the context and,
toward the end, a recapitulation of the main points covered and take-home messages make sense
also in the case of reviews. For instance, if your instructor wants you to use APA, you should know
how to provide citations in APA and not MLA. Like any other document, it must also have an
introduction, a body, and a conclusion. Some journals are now favouring the publication of rather
short reviews focusing on the last few years, with a limit on the number of words and citations.
These sources may include books, journal articles, reports, government documents, conference
papers, and credible websites. Once the issue is clarified, sticking to it without giving any
unnecessary information is essential. Some graduate schools are now offering courses in reviewing
the literature, given that most research students start. To carry out the planning you must follow the
steps below: Identify the need for literature review. More Features Connections Canva Create
professional content with Canva, including presentations, catalogs, and more. It can also affirm the
importance of studying the subject. If there are already a few or several reviews of the. Repeat the
planning steps as many times as necessary to be sure. Planning the Literature Review The planning
phase must be carried out with great care, as any mistakes that happen will impact the other phases
and your review may be totally compromised. However, traditional literature reviews remain popular
and will continue to be valuable where systematic reviews are not feasible. Reviewing the literature
requires the ability to juggle multiple tasks,from finding and evaluating relevant material to. All
review authors must participate in the development of the protocol. The process of dissertation
writing is an extremely complicated and tiring one. Therefore, always remember to have a word with
your instructors and ask them for clear instructions. Usually, it’s unnecessary, but if an abstract is
mentioned in the requirements, consider adding it to the working plan. For both of the
aforementioned purposes, the steps to write a literature review remain the same.
Given that you are presenting what the literature says about a field of study, not what you think or
believe, you must cite those authors that actually make and provide the research evidence, theories,
frameworks for practice etc. If you have any questions, please leave us a comment below that we’ll
be happy to answer. An interesting approach for when we have a large amount of primary studies is
to have a researcher to extract data and another to check the data that has already been extracted.
Some default research instruments may not work, so searching for trends is a great option. Select
primary studies: At this stage you will have to select which studies will be considered in your review.
This way, by the time you have read the literature you selected, you will. They’ll be glad to develop
new custom literature review examples for your personally. That is, you will write a document about
your review, which could be an article, chapter of your TCC, etc. This is probably a good time to
decide whether to go for a mini- or a full review. The process of dissertation writing is an extremely
complicated and tiring one. There are so many issues in contemporary science that you could spend
a. The literature review acknowledges the work of previous researchers, and in so doing, assures the
reader that your work has been well conceived. Additionally, it can briefly mention previous research
that has been conducted. It is essential to analyze each source critically to determine their
contribution to the themes being researched. Guide for formatting references in APA standards
(updated for 7th edition) Theoretical Foundation: how to do it right Literature Review: What is and
How to do it. Automatic Search: when we visit digital libraries to search for articles according to a
certain keyword or set of them, which we call search strings. What would you like to learn about in
this industry. In this way, you will have to elaborate your search strings according to each of the
libraries. However, ensure the right balance between being concise and being descriptive. It will be
the leading question to guide the research. Teachers often assign article reviews to Purpose of the
literature review The purpose of the literature review is to provide a critical written account of the
current state of research on a selected topic: For many students, the most difficult aspect of the
literature review is choosing its topic. These sources may include books, journal articles, reports,
government documents, conference papers, and credible websites. Perhaps a long lustrous curl or
even a modern sassy cut. If your journal club has exactly this sort of team, then you should
definitely write a review of the literature. In this study, we explored the availability and
characteristics of the assisting tools for the peer-reviewing process. For example, compared to 1991,
in 2008 three, eight, and forty times more papers were. Make sure that you offer logical arguments
for your critical writing. Regional outbreaks of tree diseases are requiring interdisciplinary
collaboration, e.g. between forest pathologists and landscape ecologists. Literature review is
definitely the sole and most important factor in literature review writing. Adobe InDesign Design
pixel-perfect content like flyers, magazines and more with Adobe InDesign.