Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Rubric Writing

    Uploaded by

    Ines Ehrlich
    3 views1 page
    This document outlines a rubric for evaluating formal letters and interviews. It provides criteria for evaluating the content, organization, and language used at different proficiency levels from initiating to mastering. For content, it evaluates how well the ideas represent the topic. For organization, it evaluates paragraph structure and sequence. For language, it evaluates vocabulary, grammar, and register. The higher levels demonstrate strong content, organization and language with few errors while lower levels have incomplete or incorrect content and more language mistakes.

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document outlines a rubric for evaluating formal letters and interviews. It provides criteria for evaluating the content, organization, and language used at different proficiency levels from initiating to mastering. For content, it evaluates how well the ideas represent the topic. For organization, it evaluates paragraph structure and sequence. For language, it evaluates vocabulary, grammar, and register. The higher levels demonstrate strong content, organization and language with few errors while lower levels have incomplete or incorrect content and more language mistakes.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views1 page

    Rubric Writing

    Uploaded by

    Ines Ehrlich
    This document outlines a rubric for evaluating formal letters and interviews. It provides criteria for evaluating the content, organization, and language used at different proficiency levels from initiating to mastering. For content, it evaluates how well the ideas represent the topic. For organization, it evaluates paragraph structure and sequence. For language, it evaluates vocabulary, grammar, and register. The higher levels demonstrate strong content, organization and language with few errors while lower levels have incomplete or incorrect content and more language mistakes.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    ‭Rubric Formal letter / Interview‬

    ‭Level‬ ‭Content‬ ‭Organization‬ ‭Language‬

    ‭Mastering‬ ‭ etter/ Interview masterfully‬


    L ‭ ll features of formal letter/‬
    A ‭ xcellent use of language‬
    E
    ‭reflects the ideas that‬ ‭interview writing are present.‬ ‭Varied vocabulary used with flair.‬
    ‭represent social injustice.‬ ‭Paragraphs are well organised and‬ ‭Excellent use of linking words‬
    ‭The content is‬ ‭sequenced.‬ ‭Excellent use of punctuation and‬
    ‭communicated with flair.‬ ‭Information is well presented in a‬ ‭sentence construction.‬
    ‭coherent and cogent manner. The‬ ‭Formal register.‬
    ‭text is persuasive and flows.‬

    ‭Accomplished‬ ‭Content of the letter/‬ ‭ ost features of formal letter/‬


    M ‭ ery good use of language‬
    V
    I‭nterview reflects the main‬ ‭interview writing are present.‬ ‭Varied vocabulary‬
    ‭ideas that represent social‬ ‭Paragraphs are well organised and‬ ‭Very good use of linking words‬
    ‭injustice but the text lacks‬ ‭sequenced.‬ ‭Very good use of punctuation and‬
    ‭flair.‬ ‭Information is well presented in a‬ ‭sentence construction.‬
    ‭coherent manner.‬ ‭Formal register.‬

    ‭Competent‬ ‭ ontent of the letter/‬


    C ‭ ome features of formal‬
    S ‭ ostly good use of language in spite‬
    M
    ‭Interview reflects some of‬ ‭letter/interview writing are present.‬ ‭of mistakes.‬
    ‭the ideas that represent‬ ‭Some paragraphs are well‬ ‭Simple vocabulary with little‬
    ‭social injustice but it is‬ ‭organised and sequenced.‬ ‭mistakes.‬
    ‭incomplete.‬ ‭Interaction and information is‬ ‭Good use of linking words but simple.‬
    ‭mostly well presented, though there‬ ‭Some mistakes in the use of‬
    ‭may be lapses which do not hinder‬ ‭punctuation and sentence‬
    ‭understanding.‬ ‭construction.‬
    ‭Mostly formal register.‬

    ‭Developing‬ ‭ ontent of the letter/‬


    C ‭ ome mistakes in the features of‬
    S ‭ anguage mistakes hinder‬
    L
    ‭Interview reflects of the‬ ‭the formal letter / interview.‬ ‭understanding.‬
    ‭ideas. Not all of them are‬ ‭Information is mostly disorganised‬ ‭Simple vocabulary with plenty of‬
    ‭relevant or correct.‬ ‭or lacks clarity.‬ ‭mistakes.‬
    ‭Little use of linking words‬
    ‭Plenty of errors in punctuation and‬
    ‭sentence construction.‬
    ‭Mostly informal register.‬

    ‭Initiating‬ I‭deas are not relevant,‬ ‭ o paragraphs. Some features of‬


    N ‭ lenty of language mistakes‬
    P
    ‭correct or the task is‬ ‭formal letters /interviews.‬ ‭including punctuation.‬
    ‭unfinished.‬ ‭Incoherent presentation of the‬ ‭No linking words.‬
    ‭information and/or unclear.‬ ‭Informal register.‬

    You might also like