Professional Documents
Culture Documents
b. Between the corporation and its shareholders/membersc. Between and among the shareholdersd.
Between the corporation and third parties (essentially governed by contract lawand labor law when
it comes to relationship with officers and employees)
3-Corporation is a going concern. Thus, the corporation becomes in its operation, abusiness economic
unit, a business enterprise.
A. NATURE OF CORPORATIONS
1. Corporate Attributes
a. Theories in the formation of a corporation
⬜ Tayag vs. Benguet Consolidated, 26 SCRA 242 (1968)
⬜ Ang Pue & Co. vs. Secretary, 5 SCRA 645 (1962)
1. Theory of Concession
2. Theory of Enterprise Entity
2. Classification Of Corporations
a. In relation to the State
- Public
- Private
⬜ National Coal Co. vs. CIR, 46 PHIL 583 (1924)
⬜ Philippine Society vs. COA, GR No. 169752 (2007)
- Quasi-Public
⬜ Feliciano, supra
⬜ Decision in Liban vs. Gordon, GR No. 175352, July 15, 2009 and Resolution of January 18, 2011
b. As to place of incorporation
- Domestic
- Foreign
5. War-Time test
⬜ Filipinas Compania vs. Christern, 89 PHIL 744 (1952)
6. Grandfather Rule
d. As to purpose of incorporation
- Municipal
- Religious
- Educational
- Charitable, Scientific or Vocational
- Business Corporation
e. As to number of members
- Aggregate Corporation
- Corporation Sole
⬜ Roman Catholic Administrator vs. LRC, 102 PHIL 597 (1957)
⬜ Republic vs. Villanueva, 114 SCRA 875 (1982)
h. Close Corporations
- Definition (Section 96 of the Corporation Code)
- Articles of Incorporation Requirements (Section 97 of the Corporation Code)
- Pre-emptive Rights (Section 102 of the Corporation Code)
- Amendment (Section 103 of the Corporation Code)
B. FORMATION OF CORPORATIONS
1. Organizing the Corporation
a. Promoters (Section 2 [r] of the Revised Securities Act [BP 178])
(Sections 60 and 61 of the Corporation Code)
b. Subscription Contracts
(Sections 60 and 72 of the Corporation Code)
⬜ Trillana vs. Quezon College, 93 PHIL 383
i. Purchase Agreement
⬜ Bayla vs. Silang Traffic, Co., 73 PHIL 557 (1942)
2. Formalities in Organizing
a. Generally
⬜ Government of the PI vs. Manila Railroad, 103 PHIL 757 (1929)
⬜ Rural Bank of Salinas vs. CA, 210 SCRA 510 (1992)
b. Articles of Incorporation
1. Procedure and Documentary Requirements
- As to contents and form (Section 14 and 15)
-As to corporate name (Section 18)
⬜ Red Line Transit vs. Rural Transit, 60 PHIL 549 (1934)
⬜ Philippine Insurance vs. Hartigan, 34 SCRA 252 (1970)
⬜ Universal Mills vs. Universal Textile, 78 SCRA 62 (1977)
⬜ Ang mga Kaanib sa Iglesia ng Dios kay Kristo Hesus vs. Iglesia ng Dios kay Cristo Hesus, GR No.
137592, December 12, 2001
c. By-Laws
⬜ Loyola Grand Villas vs. CA, GR No. 117188 [07 August 1997]
⬜ PMI Colleges vs. NLRC, GR No. 121466 [15 August 1997]
⬜ Pena vs. CA, 193 SCRA 7117 (1991)
2. Defective Incorporation
1. De jure
2. De facto (Section 20 of the Corporation Code)
i. Rationale for the doctrine
⬜ Tayko vs. Capistrano, 53 PHIL 866 (1928)
ii. Requisites
⬜ Fernandez vs. Cuerva, 21 SCRA 1095 (1967)
⬜ Hall vs. Piccio, 86 PHIL 603 (1950)
⬜ Benguet Consolidated vs. Pineda, 98 PHIL 711 (1956).
c. Equity cases
⬜ TESCO vs. WCC, 104 SCRA 354 (1981)
⬜ AD Santos vs. Vasquez, 22 SCRA 1158 (1968)
4. Due Process
⬜ McConnel vs. CA, 1 SCRA 723 91961)
⬜ Emilio Cano Enterprises vs. CIR, 13 SCRA 291 (1965)
⬜ NAMARCO vs. Associated Finance Co. Inc., 19 SCRA 962
⬜ Jacinto vs. CA, 198 SCRA 211 (1992)
⬜ Arcilla vs. CA, 215 SCRA 120 (1986)
⬜ AC Ransom Labor Union vs. NLRC, 142 SCRA 269
⬜ Lim vs. NLRC, 171 SCRA 328 (1989)
⬜ De Guzman vs. NLRC, 211 SCRA 723 (1992)
5. Anti-Trust Issues
⬜ Garcia vs. Executive Secretary (G.R. No. 132451 [1999])
⬜ Standard Oil Co. vs. US, 221 U.S. 1 (1910)