Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ENGLISH DEPARTMENT
SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY
AND PEDAGOGICAL IMPLICATIONS
FOR TEACHERS
Hanoi, 2024
STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY
This is to certify that to the best of our knowledge; the content of this paper is our own
work. This paper has not been submitted for any degree or other purposes. We certify that the
intellectual content of this paper is the product of our own work and that all the assistance
received in preparing this paper and sources have been acknowledged.
Date: 15/01/2024
In recent years, learning English has become increasingly essential for learners,
especially university students. While learning a new language, there are a host of
obstacles that students may encounter: vocabulary shortage, grammar mistakes, and
even a lack of motivation to keep studying for the better. In this paper, we attempt to
figure out Self-determination theory, which relates to the way people try to handle both
external and internal factors in enhancing their desire to learn English. Also, we discuss
three basic psychological needs: autonomy, competence, and relatedness, which are
associated with academic engagement and better learning outcomes. Following that are
some visible pedagogical applications in academic settings.
II. Body
1. Literature review
Firstly, there are certain definitions of motivation from some experts. Motivation
is described as an individual's inclination to attain goals depending on a set of criteria
(Yousefi, A. et al 2009). Motivation may also be described as a person's intention to
repeat an action and vice versa (Alizadeh, 2016). According to Lai (2011), motivation
refers to the causes that drive conduct defined by willingness and volition. According to
many writers' explanations of motivation, motivation is a combination of effort and
desire that offers the reasons for people's actions, objectives, and requirements to attain
the goal of learning towards an objective.
Although motivation is essential in the language learning process, university
students frequently lose focus on their studies for a variety of reasons. To increase
student motivation, teachers should be more adaptable in their use of media, approach,
and content in learning activities. When pupils achieve their goals, they should be
properly rewarded. Even though rewarding pupils might be ineffective at times, kids
must be rewarded to become more confident and patient with their studies in the future.
1
enhancing students' learning. The theory underscores individuals' efforts to satisfy three
fundamental psychological needs: autonomy, competence, and relatedness.
In terms of autonomy, we want to be able to make our own decisions rather than
being compelled to do something we don't want to do. Second, competence is the
moment when we want to feel like we have the abilities needed to accomplish the work
ourselves rather than being presented with duties that we don't comprehend. Also,
relatedness means that we want to feel like we belong, that we are needed, and that we
are not worthless or outsiders. Motivation can be categorized as non-self-determined or
self-determined.
According to Deci and Ryan (1985), amotivation is defined as the lack or
absence of a volitional urge to engage in any activity. Amotivated students are neither
intrinsically nor extrinsically motivated, and they shun academic assignments because
they see no meaningful link between their actions and their consequences (Pelletier et
al., 2001; Vallerand et al., 1992). Therefore, in general, amotivation refers to a lack of
self-determination.
According to Ryan and Deci (2000), external regulation is seen as the least
autonomous kind of behavioral regulation for students who are affected by external
regulation. Put another way, pupils can't control their actions without external rewards,
and when they're bored or uninterested, they'll act out. For instance, a secondary student
studies very hard because she knows that she would earn a doll if she obtains a perfect
score in school. However, she loses interest in learning and experiences boredom
everytime she studies because her parents do not intend to compensate her for her
performance on the next exam. Teachers can assist students who are externally regulated
by designing lessons or fostering a classroom culture that encourages students to self-
regulate (Bardach, L., Yanagida, T., Goetz, T., et al, 2023). To increase students'
motivation to study, teachers should rethink the traditional "reward" system and think of
creative alternatives. For example, students can be free to select classmates or teams to
debate or discuss in class or incorporate their favorite subjects and activities into the
sessions. Since instructors are the main adults that students engage with at school,
teachers should confide in students, answer their questions, and offer guidance.
III. Conclusion
4
REFERENCES
Banerjee, R., & Halder, S. (2021, July). Amotivation and influence of teacher support
dimensions: A self-determination theory approach. Heliyon, 7(7), e07410.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07410
Bardach, L., Yanagida, T., Goetz, T., Jach, H., & Pekrun, R. (2023). Self-Regulated and
Externally Regulated Learning in Adolescence: Developmental Trajectories and
Relations with Teacher Behavior, Parent Behavior, and Academic Achievement.
Developmental Psychology.
Borah, M. (2021). Motivation in learning. Journal of Critical Reviews, 8(2), 550-552.
Chow, S. J., & Yong, B. C. S. (2013). Secondary school students' motivation and
achievement in combined science. Online Submission, 3(4), 213-228.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2013). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human
behavior. Springer Science & Business Media.
Handley, R. (2010). ‘Teaching that engages students in learning’. Special Education
Perspectives, 19(1), 3–5.
Huang, H. M., & Liaw, S. S. (2007). Exploring learners' self-efficacy, autonomy, and
motivation toward e-learning. Perceptual and motor skills, 105(2), 581-586.
Moller, A. C., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Self-determination theory and public
policy: Improving the quality of consumer decisions without using coercion.
Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 25(1), 104-116.
NSW DET (New South Wales Department of Education and Training) (2004). Priority
Schools Funding Program: Support sheet #2. Literacy in low socioeconomic status
(SES) school communities. Sydney: NSW DET.
QLD DET (Queensland Department of Education and Training) (2001). New Basics –
The why, what, how and when of Rich Tasks. Brisbane: QLD DET.
5
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of
intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist,
55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational psychologist, 26(3-
4), 299-323.
Valerio, K. (2012). Intrinsic motivation in the classroom. Journal of Student
Engagement: Education Matters, 2(1), 30-35.
Vallerand, R. J., & Ratelle, C. F. (2002). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: a
hierarchical model.