Final Assessment (20 marks) – to be filled by industry mentor
Excellent Good
Final design of
process/equipment/
system: arrived and
optimized through
engineering, social,
environmental, ethical,
economic, financial,
institutional and
commercial considerations
Application of Engineering
Principles and
software/mathematical
tools: using engineering
knowledge and
concepts/codes/standards/
design manuals/literature
and software/mathematical
tools.
Leadership: able to work in
group(s) and to take
initiative
Average Poor Marks
achieved
5 3-4 2 1 X
Design meets or Design meets desired Barely capable of Not capable of
exceeds desired objectives. achieving desired achieving desired
objectives with specific Moderately effective objectives. Minimal objectives. No or trivial
timeframe. Effective utilization of resource. utilization of resource. utilization of resource.
implementation of
resource.
Critical selection and Effective application of Serious deficiencies in No or erroneous
application of engineering principles proper selection and application of
engineering principles resulting in reasonable use of engineering engineering principles
ensuring reasonable solution with moderate principles with low yielding unreasonable
results and adequate application of level of application of solution and trivial or
application of design software/mathematical software/mathematical no application of
tools. tools. tools. software/mathematical
tools.
Taken initiative to Taken moderate Occasionally taken Never or rarely took
meet project initiative to meet initiative to meet initiative to meet
requirements and/or project requirements project requirements project requirements
able to consult and and/or moderate and/or non-adequate and/or limited ability
work with peers in ability to consult and ability to consult and to consult and work
various fields in the work with peers in work with peers in with peers in various
realisation of project. various fields in the various fields in the fields in the realisation
realisation of project. realisation of project. of project.
 Excellent Good Average Poor Marks
achieved
5 3-4 2 1 X
Professional discipline: Maintained high Maintained moderate Moderate to low Poor overall
maintained overall degree of professional to high degree of degree of professional professional discipline.
discipline of the discipline in all professional disciplines disciplines in all or
organization categories. in all or most most categories.
(attendance/regularity, categories.
meetings with the industry
mentors, attentive to the
professional/environmental
/ health and safety
protocols of organisation)
Total marks achieved ∑X

Name and the signature of the industry mentor with date:…………………………………………………………………….

Name of the student:…………………………… Roll number:…………………………… Branch:………………………….