Title: Mastering the Art of Literature Review: Your Ultimate Guide

Embarking on a literature review can be likened to navigating through a labyrinth of scholarly

articles, journals, and research papers. It requires meticulous planning, keen analytical skills, and a
knack for synthesizing information. Whether you're a seasoned academic or a novice researcher,
mastering the art of literature review is crucial for producing high-quality scholarly work.

The process of conducting a literature review can often feel overwhelming. From defining your
research question to sifting through a vast sea of literature, each step presents its own set of
challenges. Moreover, ensuring that your review is comprehensive, coherent, and relevant adds
another layer of complexity to the task.

One common struggle researchers face is the sheer volume of literature available on their topic of
interest. With countless articles published daily across various disciplines, narrowing down relevant
sources can be like finding a needle in a haystack. Additionally, distinguishing between credible
sources and unreliable ones requires a discerning eye and a thorough understanding of academic
standards.

Furthermore, synthesizing the information gathered from diverse sources into a cohesive narrative
can be a daunting task. Balancing the voices of different scholars, identifying key themes and
debates, and presenting a coherent argument requires careful planning and organization. Without a
clear roadmap, researchers risk getting lost in the labyrinth of conflicting ideas and viewpoints.

In light of these challenges, seeking expert guidance and assistance can significantly alleviate the
burden of conducting a literature review. ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers comprehensive literature review
services tailored to meet your specific needs. Our team of experienced researchers and writers
possesses the expertise and resources to conduct thorough literature reviews across a wide range of
disciplines.

By entrusting your literature review to ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can rest assured that your work will
be meticulously crafted to meet the highest academic standards. From defining your research
question to synthesizing key findings, our team will guide you through every step of the process,
ensuring that your literature review is both insightful and impactful.

Don't let the daunting task of literature review impede your research progress. Contact ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔ today and take the first step towards mastering the art of literature review. With
our expert assistance, you can navigate the labyrinth of scholarly literature with confidence and
precision.
Use a format appropriate for the section of the review. Conclusions Although education is widely
regarded as the single most important way of improving end-of-life care delivered by nursing home
staff, existing educational interventions appear unlikely to promote better patient outcomes and
evidence to demonstrate their effectiveness is not robust. A thematic framework analysis categorised
explanations into patient and system level factors. Lit reviews can also be standalone pieces, either
as assignments in a class or as publications. It’s like drawing a line in time that shows how far we’ve
come and explains how we’ve got there. You could potentially structure your literature review
chapter according to theme, group, variables, chronologically or per concepts in your field of
research. Users’ guides to the medical literature. VI. How to use an overview. Excluded from this
review was primary research relating to people with diabetes with mental disorders not considered an
SMI, studies carried out prior to 2003 and unpublished research due to restricted resources. You are
seriously underestimating the value of a note-taking template. I know. You probably think the way
you take notes now is just fine. For example, for meta-analyses of standardised mean differences,
authors might re-express the combined results in units of a well known measurement scale, and for
meta-analyses of risk ratios or odds ratios, authors might re-express results in absolute terms (such
as risk difference). 91 Furthermore, authors need to interpret effect estimates in relation to whether
the effect is of importance to decision makers. Integrate the individual main ideas to put together the
state of knowledge related to your topic. Both groups read a similar number of articles from
academic journals each month. For example, if prior work has already determined that a given record
does not meet the eligibility criteria, it can be removed without manual checking. All of your notes
are concise, are well-organized, and contain the same information in the same places. While the study
focuses on one topic, the Internet’s impact on American presidential politics, it would still be
organized chronologically reflecting technological developments in media. OpenUrl CrossRef
PubMed Web of Science 11. ? MacAuley D, Sweeney KS. Limitations The usability, acceptability,
and usefulness of the checklist will need to be assessed and tailored to different users. Reproduced
from Barker et al. 191 View this table: View popup View inline Risk of bias in studies Item 18.
Calculate on exit This forces Word to run or refresh any calculations, such as total price when the
user exits the field. If a tool was used to automatically translate search strings for one database to
another, 47 specify the tool used. This template helps you to summarize the vital aspects of an
existing body of literature, find out any significant flaws in existing knowledge or outline the areas
that. Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current
approaches. We’ve written a step-by-step guide that you can follow below. The purpose of tabulating
data varies but commonly includes the complete and transparent reporting of the results or
comparing the results across study characteristics. 28 Different purposes will likely lead to different
table structures. For example, the Date Picker control offers options for the format you want to use
to display the date. If comparing groups, describe the direction of the effect Explanation: Users of
reviews rely on the reporting of all statistical syntheses conducted so that they have complete and
unbiased evidence on which to base their decisions. And it’s made all the difference in changing a
painful, unproductive experience into something much more effective. The purpose of this
descriptive or mapping review was to characterize publication trends in the medical informatics
literature over a 20-year period (1987 to 2006). Both types of replication could include differences in
systematic review methods (appendix box 1), which include, for example, whether to use traditional
comprehensive reviews versus rapid reviews or living systematic reviews. There is no preconceived
plan to systematically review all of the literature although this can be done.
We conducted searches of EMBASE, CINAHL, Medline, Psycinfo and PubMed electronic
databases from 2003 until April 2019. The knowledge users included commissioners, funders, and
other users of systematic reviews, including clinicians, patients, and representatives from
organisations involved with policy making. All but one was conducted in North America and two
North American studies were limited to veterans. In the sciences, for instance, treatments for medical
problems are constantly changing according to the latest studies. An example of this approach in the
eHealth domain is offered by DeShazo, Lavallie, and Wolf (2009). And your subsequent literature
reviews will only get easier. Table of contents Why write a literature review, examples of literature
reviews, step 1: search for relevant literature, step 2: evaluate and select sources, step 3: identify
themes, debates and gaps, step 4: outline your literature review’s structure, step 5: write your
literature review, frequently asked questions about literature reviews, introduction. You’re right! I
call these “exemplary articles.” They add a lot to your project. If other systematic reviews addressing
the same (or a largely similar) question are available, explain why the current review was considered
necessary (for example, previous reviews are out of date or have discordant results; new review
methods are available to address the review question; existing reviews are methodologically flawed;
or the current review was commissioned to inform a guideline or policy for a particular
organisation). OpenUrl PubMed 56. ? Karsh B. Meso-ergonomics: a new paradigm for
macroergonomics research. 2006, Proceedings of the International Ergonomics Association. Essential
elements For all outcomes, irrespective of whether statistical synthesis was undertaken, present for
each study summary statistics for each group (where appropriate). To do this, you’ll use a
combination of tools (we’ll discuss some of these later) to find journal articles, books, ebooks,
research reports, dissertations, theses and any other credible sources of information that relate to
your topic. Umbrella reviews generally adhere to the same principles and rigorous methodological
guidelines used in systematic reviews. Wilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IJ, et al. Extracted
data were compared, with any discrepancies being resolved through discussion. When you click
through from our site to a retailer and buy a product or service, we may earn affiliate commissions.
Results Literature search overview A total of 583 papers were found through the database search
based on our search strategy. You adjusted your reading and note-taking strategy to match.
Patsopoulos N. A., Analatos A. A., Ioannidis J.P. A. Relative citation impact of various study
designs in the health sciences. Outcomes taken to indicate success of educational interventions. For
example, a book surveying the history of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict may include a chapter on the
role Egypt has played in mediating the conflict, or look in the index for the pages where Egypt is
mentioned in the text. An outline for literature review can also evaluate these. If you see inaccuracies
in our content, please report the mistake via this form. Let’s build some solidarity and whine about
what makes the literature so painful to begin with. Additional elements If assessments of risk of bias
were done for specific outcomes or results in each study, consider displaying risk of bias judgments
on a forest plot, next to the study results, so that the limitations of studies contributing to a particular
meta-analysis are evident (see Sterne et al 86 for an example forest plot). You likely won’t be able to
read absolutely everything that has been written on your topic, so it will be necessary to evaluate
which sources are most relevant to your research question. Example of item 20b of PRISMA 2020
checklist “Twelve studies, including a total of 159,086 patients, reported on the rate of major
bleeding complications. I also went into detail about how the change in population and government,
people are using medical technology in homes more and more. The need for individual trial results in
reports of systematic reviews. A thorough review of the literature revealed the incidence of ea to be
reduced with the.
Read your assignment carefully and seek clarification from your professor or instructor if needed.
Are health and demographic surveillance system estimates sufficiently generalisable. There is no need
to read the entire articles (unless the contents interest you); just quickly browse through to see the
sections, and see how each section is introduced and what is contained in them. While the current
literature has envisioned the potential of patient-facing HITs on patient-centred care, a comparison of
five suggested or evaluated design style have not been specified. You don’t have to be a prolific
writer to create an impeccable article. Example of item 13e of PRISMA 2020 checklist “Given a
sufficient number of trials, we used unadjusted and adjusted mixed-effects meta-regression analyses
to assess whether variation among studies in smoking cessation effect size was moderated by
tailoring of the intervention for disadvantaged groups. If a tool was used to assess risk of bias due to
missing results in a synthesis, present responses to questions in the tool, judgments about risk of bias,
and any information used to support such judgments to help readers understand why particular
judgments were made. We help from high school students to Ph.D. candidates ranging from
admission essays to dissertations. In conclusion the SMI population is at a greater risk of diabetes
and hence its complications. 5 9 14 While national DRS programmes reduce avoidable visual loss, 25
patient attendance is imperative in this process. In this case, the doctor can pull up whatever data he
want to share to the second screen, and they can both look at that screen and discuss the data.
Designing a patient-centered user interface for access decisions about EHR data: implications from
patient interviews. When you finish your research and write your thesis or paper to present your
findings, it should include a literature review to provide the context to which your work is a
contribution. However, our large team of stakeholders thought that the investment of resources for
completing the checklist would be well justified given the potential value of replicating systematic
reviews that inform policy and practice as well as the opportunity to limit waste related to
unnecessary duplication. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews
incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. For
example, authors might state that the classifier was trained on the set of records generated for the
review in question (as may be the case when updating reviews) and specify which thresholds were
applied to remove records. However, concurrent research on the effects of acute supplementation of
caffeine on cardiorespiratory responses during endurance exercise in hot and humid conditions is
unavailable. How to integrate the electronic health record and patient-centered communication into
the medical visit: a skills-based approach. The literature review must be defined by a guiding concept
(eventually your research objective, the problem or issue you are discussing, or your argumentative
thesis). A disposition file was created containing comments and revisions from each respondent, and
the checklist was subsequently revised 11 times. Critically evaluate: mention the strengths and
weaknesses of your sources. Our goal is to deliver the most accurate information and the most
knowledgeable advice possible in order to help you make smarter buying decisions on tech gear and
a wide array of products and services. MJP and JEM presented proposals at the development
meeting. It updates a previous review by Fottrell and Byass, charting the methodological transition
of VA from research environment to routine application in CRVS systems 13 with a focus on the use
of VA to inform health system and policy research and development. Explain the gap’s significance:
Predict how filling this gap would benefit your research field. OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of
Science 3. ? Greenhalgh T. Is my practice evidence based. Insert a building block control Use a
building block control when you want users to choose a specific block of text. One designated
meeting participant provided a brief commentary on the criterion and two others facilitated an
interactive discussion on its value in determining when to replicate systematic reviews. In essence,
conducting research literature reviews buy literature review online and a literature review is a
discussion of the data presented by renowned researchers within the scope of a specific topic.
Footnotes Contributors: PT and VAW contributed equally to this paper. Challenges in transferring
individual learning to organizational learning in the residential care of older people.
Included studies were appraised for quality and data were synthesised thematically. Should I
summarize, synthesize or critique sources. Moreover, every paper passes through proprietary anti-
plagiarism algorithms to make sure you get 100% originality. You can emphasise the timeliness of the
topic (“many recent studies have focused on the problem of x”) or highlight a gap in the literature
(“while there has been much research on x, few researchers have taken y into consideration”). So
you’ll often hit a paywall when clicking through to journal websites. You know whether it says
something dubious or valuable. And the longer you put it off, the guiltier you feel. These results are
consistent with the results of a meta?analysis showing that technology in education programs are not
effective when not accompanied by parent or student training (McEwan, 2015). Check out Scribbr’s
professional proofreading services. Lit reviews can also be standalone pieces, either as assignments
in a class or as publications. However, this term is variable depending on the number of pages and the
kind of paper provided. This pdf is a sample literature review example written in apa mla format.
Dynamic modeling of patient and physician eye gaze to understand the effects of electronic health
records on doctor-patient communication and attention. The more specific you can be, the more
efficient your literature search and evaluation will be. A literature review is an objective, critical
summary of published research literature relevant to a topic under consideration for research.
Providing a brief summary of the characteristics and risk of bias among studies contributing to each
synthesis (meta-analysis or other) should help readers understand the applicability and risk of bias in
the synthesised result. In conjunction with complementary data collection efforts, VA can contribute
to more holistic views of health systems performance combining evidence on burden of disease with
social determinants and local knowledge. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for
reporting systematic reviews. If we have made an error or published misleading information, we will
correct or clarify the article. JMT received salary from Evidence Partners Inc, creators of DistillerSR
software for systematic reviews; Evidence Partners Inc was not involved in the design or outcomes
of the statement and the views expressed solely represent those of the author. If the review is an
update or replication of a particular systematic review, indicate this and cite the previous review. This
information should be reported to allow an explicit assessment of the extent to which an estimate of
effect is correct. 11 Importance of reporting biases Different types of reporting biases may hamper
the conduct and interpretation of systematic reviews. Finally, is the research question clinically
important. We justified all decisions to down- or up-grade the certainty of studies using footnotes,
and we provided comments to aid the reader’s understanding of the results where necessary.” 188
Study selection Item 16a. Many considerations may influence an author’s choice of meta-analysis
model. When you click through from our site to a retailer and buy a product or service, we may earn
affiliate commissions. A scandal of invisibility: making everyone count by counting everyone.
Additional elements If a random-effects meta-analysis model was used, consider specifying other
details about the methods used, such as the method for calculating confidence limits for the
heterogeneity variance. In the modified version developed, the blinding section was disregarded as
studies containing VA do not usually involve blinding, and so inclusion of this component would
have had a misleading adverse impact on the quality assessment. But what happens when you
consider weakness A and weakness B together.
Sometimes you may need to quote certain terminology that was coined by the author, is not common
knowledge, or taken directly from the study. Is it safe to use your relatively cheap paper writing
service. Checkbox size Set a size Exactly or Auto to change size as needed. If you have limited time
to conduct research, literature reviews can give you an overview or act as a stepping stone. When I
critique a study, I like to pretend that I’m a consultant. Skim Use a note-taking template Be critical
Pace yourself Know when to stop Be encouraged: it gets easier. We excluded studies because they
compared stenting in Bosiers 2015 and RELINE, laser atherectomy in EXCITE ISR, or cutting
balloon angioplasty in NCT00481780 versus uncoated balloon angioplasty for in?stent restenosis.
Strategies for writing the literature review Find a focus. Taking an integrated knowledge translation
approach in research to develop the CONSORT-Equity 2017 reporting guideline: an observational
study. Publications Account settings Browse Titles NCBI Bookshelf. London: Pearson. You may
reproduce it for non-commercial use if you use the entire handout and attribute the source: The
Writing Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Make a Gift Have a language expert
improve your writing Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, automatically generate references
for free. Right? Wrong! The “literature” of a literature review refers to any collection of materials on
a topic, not necessarily the great literary texts of the world. “Literature” could be anything from a
set of government pamphlets on British colonial methods in Africa to scholarly articles on the
treatment of a torn ACL. This is known as “bias due to missing results” and arises from “reporting
biases” such as selective non-publication and selective non-reporting of results (see box 4 ). 81
Direct methods for assessing the risk of bias due to missing results include comparing outcomes and
analyses pre-specified in study registers, protocols, and statistical analysis plans with results that
were available in study reports. Ask our company and we’ll do this assignment in no time for you.
Use of the checklist for other types of review questions beyond interventions needs to be evaluated.
The extension statement (appendix 7) provides an explanation and example for each item. The
corresponding author attests that all listed authors meet authorship criteria and that no others
meeting the criteria have been omitted. If other systematic reviews addressing the same (or a largely
similar) question are available, explain why the current review was considered necessary (for
example, previous reviews are out of date or have discordant results; new review methods are
available to address the review question; existing reviews are methodologically flawed; or the
current review was commissioned to inform a guideline or policy for a particular organisation).
Because of its rapidity of induction and pleasant, nonirritating odor (moore et al., 2003). Notes
templates literature review table template matrix. Inclusion and exclusion criteria The scope of this
study was determined by inclusion and exclusion criteria. Marshall IJ, Noel-Storr A, Kuiper J,
Thomas J, Wallace BC. Because of its rapidity of induction and pleasant, nonirritating odor (moore
et al., 2003). Learn how to write a literature review in 3 straightforward steps with this step by step
tutorial, including a free literature review excel template. It outlines the topic you are discussing, as
well as asking why is this a crucial piece of information. Our systematic review replication checklist
aims to provide guidance to authors, commissioners, funders, and other users of systematic reviews,
including clinicians, patients, and representatives from organisations involved with policy making.
Choi PT, Halpern SH, Malik N, Jadad AR, Tramer MR, et al. Chapter 9?Methods for Literature
Reviews - Handbook of eHealth Evaluation: An Evidence-based Approach Your browsing activity is
empty. Qualitative versus quantitative research Empirical versus theoretical scholarship Divide the
research by sociological, historical, or cultural sources Theoretical: In many humanities articles, the
literature review is the foundation for the theoretical framework. Further quantitative and qualitative
research, in particular within the UK population, would support a greater understanding of DRS
attendance and barriers to attendance in those with mental illness. It can be helpful to make an
annotated bibliography, where you compile full reference information and write a paragraph of
summary and analysis for each source. It might help to get advice from others familiar with the topic
about how extensive your search needs to be.
It should not be confused with a book review, which. A literature review is designed to help readers
understand how to write my literature review free scope of buy literature review online existing
information buy literature review online about a dissertation. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2015; 3 ( 1
): e2.. pmid: 25583145; pmcid: PMC4319142. If any adaptations to an existing tool to assess risk of
bias in studies were made (such as omitting or modifying items), specify the adaptations. How will
you further your research as a result of the review. I recommend reviewing two articles each day. No
more. No less. When you finish those two reviews, pat yourself on the back. Naturally, it’s quite
difficult to conduct research and write a perfect 150-page paper within 24 hours. Regardless of the
structure you chose, a review should always include the following three sections: An introduction,
which should give the reader an outline of why you are writing the review and explain the relevance
of the topic. After the study we invited a sample of those in the intervention group to repeat their
appraisal as a validation exercise. Literature reviews also provide a solid background for a research
paper’s investigation. OpenUrl PubMed Web of Science 5. ? MacAuley D. READER: an acronym
to aid critical reading by general practitioners. It's not long, and gives some tips to fill in what you
just learned from the video. The most interesting literature reviews are often written as arguments
(again, as mentioned at the beginning of the page, this is discipline-specific and doesn’t work for all
situations). We identified additional papers by examining the included papers’ reference lists. For
instance, Levy and Ellis (2006) proposed a generic framework for conducting such reviews.
Download the guidelines for contributing authors from the journal website and format your draft to
adhere to them exactly. These activities are commonly part of a special study module, research
project for an intercalated degree, or another type of essay based assignment. New York: Longman.
Troyka, Lynn Quittman, and Doug Hesse. 2016. Simon and Schuster Handbook for Writers, 11th ed.
The GRADE Working Group clarifies the construct of certainty of evidence. Reviews Tips for
Writing Literature Reviews Writing Literature Review: Useful Sites Citation Resources Other
Academic Writings What are Literature Reviews. It is a critical, analytical summary and synthesis of
the current knowledge of a topic. If informal methods (that is, those that do not involve a formal
statistical test) were used to investigate heterogeneity—which may arise particularly when the data
are not amenable to meta-analysis—describe the results observed. If your lit review is part of a
larger paper, the introduction and conclusion pieces. Define broad weaknesses that explain the
shortcomings of multiple articles. Three studies reported on mental health related barriers to
attending DRS ( table 2 ). In theory, critical reading is an objective skill and should not be influenced
by the type of practice or seniority. A conclusion, which summarizes the key findings, the main
agreements and disagreements in the literature, your overall perspective, and any gaps or areas for
further research. ?? If your literature review is part of a longer paper, visit our guide on what is a
research paper for additional tips. ?? UNC writing center: Literature reviews. The Preferred
Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was developed to
facilitate transparent and complete reporting of systematic reviews and has been updated (to
PRISMA 2020) to reflect recent advances in systematic review methodology and terminology. It
demonstrates to your readers how your research fits within a larger field of study. Next, we look at
these important cognitive skills student scientists will need to develop and employ to successfully
write a literature review, and provide some guidance for navigating these stages.
Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Finally, is the research question
clinically important. Acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: a case study
of the pitfalls in the evolution of evidence. Develop an understanding of what is out there, what
terms are accurate and helpful, etc., and keep track of all of it with citation management tools. As in
most narrative reviews, the scope of the research questions being investigated is broad: (a) how
development of these systems are carried out; (b) which methods are used to investigate these
systems; and (c) what conclusions can be drawn as a result of the development of these systems. To
provide clear answers to these questions, a literature search was conducted on six electronic
databases and Google Scholar. Open a template or use a blank document To create a form in Word
that others can fill out, start with a template or document and add content controls. It is a critical,
analytical summary and synthesis of the current knowledge of a topic. A statistically significant
divergence was found between the barriers perceived by patients and staff, with staff rating financial
problems and depression as less important. In addition buy literature review online to this, a good
dissertation bibliographic review can serve as a foothold for an order bibliographic review to obtain
some PhDs. course. Methods Search strategy The authors conducted an online database search to
identify articles published before December 2014 relevant to the objectives of this study. The next
step is proper referencing and formatting in compliance with the requirements. Replication,
duplication, and waste in a quarter million systematic reviews and meta-analyses. For instance, you
might explain that your review includes only peer-reviewed articles and journals. So Nature asked
editors and working scientists with well-cited reviews for their tips. We included papers with a
suggested or evaluated design of the patient-facing HIT in the outpatient settings. RobotReviewer:
evaluation of a system for automatically assessing bias in clinical trials. Sensitivity analyses differ
from subgroup analyses. Your interpretation of the available sources must be backed up with
evidence to show that what you are saying is valid. A scandal of invisibility: making everyone count
by counting everyone. When comparing different sources, how do they relate to each other.
Limitations included the small number of identified studies and that the broad inclusion criteria
resulted in heterogeneous studies which were not easily comparable. Opportunities and challenges
for verbal autopsy in the national Death Registration System in Sri Lanka: past and future. If
standard phrases that incorporate the certainty of evidence were used (such as “hip protectors
probably reduce the risk of hip fracture slightly”), 130 report the intended interpretation of each
phrase and the reference for the source guidance. If results were obtained from multiple sources
(such as journal article, study register entry, clinical study report, correspondence with authors),
report the source of the data. If you want to work smart, you don't want to miss this. NOTE: We
only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you
wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. As you probably already know, not all research is
created equally, and so you need to make sure that your literature review is built on credible research.
Some other papers focused on the evaluation of preliminary design prototypes of patient-centred
HITs. What to do with a clinical trial with conflicts of interest. Doing Your Literature Review:
Traditional and Systematic Techniques.