Crafting a Literature Review for Your Case Study: A Challenging Task

Writing a literature review for a case study is a task that demands meticulous attention to detail,
extensive research, and critical analysis. It requires a deep understanding of the topic at hand and the
ability to synthesize information from various sources into a coherent narrative. However, many
students and researchers find this process daunting and time-consuming.

One of the main challenges in writing a literature review is locating relevant sources. With the vast
amount of information available online and in academic journals, identifying the most pertinent
studies and articles can be overwhelming. Moreover, evaluating the credibility and reliability of
sources adds another layer of complexity to the process.

Once the relevant literature has been identified, synthesizing the information into a coherent
narrative requires careful planning and organization. It's essential to present the findings of each
study in a logical sequence and to highlight the connections between them. Additionally, critically
analyzing the strengths and weaknesses of each study is crucial for providing a balanced and
nuanced perspective.

Another common challenge in writing a literature review is maintaining objectivity and avoiding
bias. It's essential to approach the research with an open mind and to consider multiple viewpoints
and interpretations. This requires careful attention to language and tone, as well as rigorous
adherence to academic conventions.

Given the complexity and time-consuming nature of writing a literature review, many students and
researchers opt to seek assistance from professional writing services. ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers
expert assistance with crafting literature reviews for case studies. Our team of experienced writers
specializes in conducting comprehensive literature reviews and synthesizing information from
diverse sources. Whether you're struggling to locate relevant literature or need help with structuring
and organizing your review, we're here to help.

By entrusting your literature review to ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can save time and ensure that your
case study is supported by a robust and well-researched foundation. Our writers are committed to
delivering high-quality work that meets the highest academic standards. Don't let the challenges of
writing a literature review hold you back—order from ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ today and take the first
step towards academic success.
Literature reviews are commonly used in fields such as history, literary studies, and philosophy. Co-
production as a route to employability: Lessons from services with lone parents. Towards a new
paradigm of healthcare: Addressing challenges to professional identities through Community
Operational Research. You start with some articles about the physiology of sperm whales in biology
journals written in the 1980’s. Time-limited: Literature reviews can become quickly outdated as new
research is published, making it difficult to keep up with the latest developments in a field. Lit
reviews can take many different organizational patterns depending on what you are trying to
accomplish with the review. JBI EBP Database (formerly Joanna Briggs Institute EBP Database)
This database includes systematic reviews, evidence summaries, and best practice information
sheets. The goal is to deliberately document, critically evaluate, and summarize scientifically all of
the research about a clearly defined research problem. How to write Literature Review Here are
some steps to follow when writing a literature review: Define your research question or topic: Before
starting your literature review, it is essential to define your research question or topic. For the Q
statistic, when the P value of the chi-squared test, calculated from the forest plot in Fig. 4, is less
than 0.1, it is considered to show statistical heterogeneity and a random-effect can be used. In: The
Sage handbook of organizational research methods. edn. Edited by Buchanan D, Bryman A: Sage
Publications Ltd; 2009. As in most narrative reviews, the scope of the research questions being
investigated is broad: (a) how development of these systems are carried out; (b) which methods are
used to investigate these systems; and (c) what conclusions can be drawn as a result of the
development of these systems. To provide clear answers to these questions, a literature search was
conducted on six electronic databases and Google Scholar. Family Physicians Inquiries Network:
Clinical Inquiries Provide the ideal answers to clinical questions using a structured search, critical
appraisal, authoritative recommendations, clinical perspective, and rigorous peer review. Drawers
shall be made of the same stuffs and unbroken clean. Findings from eight rct s involving 6,615
participants were pooled into meta-analyses to calculate the magnitude of effects that mobile text
message reminders have on the rate of attendance at healthcare appointments compared to no
reminders and phone call reminders. The literature review gives you a chance to: Demonstrate your
familiarity with the topic and its scholarly context Develop a theoretical framework and
methodology for your research Position your work in relation to other researchers and theorists Show
how your research addresses a gap or contributes to a debate Evaluate the current state of research
and demonstrate your knowledge of the scholarly debates around your topic. Read them to get a
sense of the types of themes you might want to look for in your own research or to identify ways to
organize your final review. Critical Evaluation Critical evaluation involves assessing the quality and
validity of the literature. You can also use this method to consider what is currently of interest to
scholars in this field and what is not. Moreover, our results show that a worse course of the disease is
associated with higher histological grade. The literature review usually comes near the beginning of
your thesis or dissertation. The process of synthesis started at a very broad level with the goal of
understanding which aspects of leadership were addressed in the literature. Literature Analysis The
literature analysis is the main body of the literature review. You need to have an idea of what you
will be reviewing in order to effectively search for references and to write a coherent summary of the
research on it. This is because you’ve just finished reading Moby Dick, and you wonder if that
whale’s portrayal is really real. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015.. Kivioja A, Ervasti H, Kinnunen J,
Kaitila I, Wolf M, Bohling T. Use these keywords in your search to narrow down your results. We
conducted a retrospective cohort study on patients diagnosed and followed up from 1960 to 2019 to
describe the clinical and pathological features of individuals affected by peripheral chondrosarcoma
in multiple osteochondromas, to evaluate follow up information and individual outcome and to
compare the results with literature. Chondrosarcoma in the United States (1973 to 2003): an analysis
of 2890 cases from the SEER database. It is shorter than a stand-alone review because it must be
limited to very specific studies and theories that are directly relevant to the current study.
Ultrasound showed a capsule in two cases and no capsule in nine cases. Should I evaluate the
sources in any way beyond evaluating how they relate to understanding the research problem? 5.
Where plentiful reviews already exist, a team may decide to conduct a review of reviews 5 by
including multiple QES within a mega-synthesis 28 29 ( table 2, item R6). In an RRL, you discuss
knowledge and findings from existing literature relevant to your study topic. It includes activities
such as evaluating the effectiveness of coproduction efforts, assessing the impact of coproduction on
outcomes, and making adjustments to improve the coproduction process. These wider ranges of
studies highlight that a particular intervention or group of interventions may work well for one
professional group but be ineffective for another. Conclude by providing some insight into the
relationship between the central topic of the literature review and a larger area of study such as a
discipline, a scientific endeavor, or a profession. Some databases to search for journals and articles
include: Your university’s library catalogue Google Scholar Project Muse (humanities and social
sciences) Medline (life sciences and biomedicine) EconLit (economics) Inspec (physics, engineering
and computer science) You can use boolean operators to help narrow down your search: Read the
abstract to find out whether an article is relevant to your question. All of these roles can be played
by people drawn from various backgrounds, including senior staff, health care professionals, experts
in coproduction, researchers, citizens, or volunteers. Historical Review Few things rest in isolation
from historical precedent. How to Make a Literature Review in Research (RRL Example) A good
RRL does NOT: A literature review does not simply reference and list all of the material you have
cited in your paper. During the selection process, we included studies that looked explicitly at
interventions designed to turn research evidence into practice. This means we'll keep fixing the work
until the supervisor approves it. In this paper we describe clinical and histological findings and
genetic background of a large series of SPC in MO patients. Reference lists of relevant papers were
also examined. The effectiveness of toolkits as knowledge translation strategies for integrating
evidence into clinical care: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e006808.. Afari-Asiedu S,
Abdulai MA, Tostmann A, et al. In the last 36 months, he received royalties from Systematic
Approaches To a Successful Literature Review (Sage 3rd edition), honoraria from the Agency for
Healthcare Research and Quality, and travel support from the WHO. It goes beyond documentation
and reflects decisions related to the selection of the sources, the search terms used, the period of time
covered, the articles selected in the search, and the application of backward and forward searches (
vom Brocke et al., 2009 ). In short, the rigour of any review article is reflected by the explicitness of
its methods (i.e., transparency) and the soundness of the approach used. Feel free to ask questions or
share additional instructions. Try to analyze patterns, turning points and key debates that have shaped
the direction of the field. They concluded that combined interventions were more likely to be
effective than single interventions. The second P value is from the chi-squared test, which tests the
null hypothesis for a lack of heterogeneity. A case study is an appropriate research design when you
want to gain concrete, contextual, in-depth knowledge about a specific real-world subject. Notice
that Falk and Mills weave references to other sources into their own text, but they still maintain their
own voice by starting and ending the paragraph with their own ideas and their own words. Doing
Your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic Techniques. Fifteen articles were conceptual
papers, and four were literature reviews. The significance of the ontology becomes apparent
depending on the nature of the case and the types of the research questions. The preoperative CT
diagnosis was three reninoma, one renal cell carcinoma, and seven undetermined tumors.
Abbreviations Before and after study Controlled clinical trial Effective Practice and Organisation of
Care High-income countries Information and Communications Technology Interrupted time series
Knowledge translation Low- and middle-income countries Randomised controlled trial Grol R,
Grimshaw J. However, particularly in the social sciences, thinking about research problems from
multiple vectors is a key strategy for finding new solutions to a problem or gaining a new perspective.
Not all research articles contain an explicit review of the literature, but most do, whether it is a
discrete section or indistinguishable from the rest of the Introduction. Some of the major advantages
of this are as follows: Android is Linux — based. Identifies critical gaps and points of disagreement.
Team members independently evaluate the studies being considered for inclusion in the review and
compare results, adjudicating any differences of opinion. There are no freelancers, only certified
experts from the best U.S. universities. A literature review of your study helps in explaining your
study efficiently. It might aim to: Exemplify a theory by showing how it explains the case under
investigation Expand on a theory by uncovering new concepts and ideas that need to be incorporated
Challenge a theory by exploring an outlier case that doesn’t fit with established assumptions To
ensure that your analysis of the case has a solid academic grounding, you should conduct a literature
review of sources related to the topic and develop a theoretical framework. However, literature
review case study example, the event does not have to be a rare or uniquely significant to support
new thinking about the research problem or to challenge an existing hypothesis. Dynamic contrast-
enhanced CT showed nine mild enhancement, and two moderate enhancement in parenchymal phase.
Failures of implementation run the risk of stakeholder disillusionment; thus, the management of
expectations is important. The references list includes all the sources cited in the literature review,
and follows a specific referencing style (e.g., APA, MLA, Harvard). The extracted data must be
presented in a meaningful way that suggests a new contribution to the extant literature ( Jesson et
al., 2011 ). Webster and Watson (2002) warn researchers that literature reviews should be much more
than lists of papers and should provide a coherent lens to make sense of extant knowledge on a
given topic. In order to maintain transparency and objectivity throughout this process, study
selection is conducted independently by at least two investigators. Validity -- are the author's
arguments and conclusions convincing. The purpose of this descriptive or mapping review was to
characterize publication trends in the medical informatics literature over a 20-year period (1987 to
2006). What are the strengths and weaknesses of the research. Ten Simple Rules for Writing a
Literature Review Literature reviews are in great demand in most scientific fields. Cell Tumor with
atypical pathological features: report of a case and review of literature. Step 2: Research and collect
all the scholarly information on the topic that might be pertinent to your study. Our systematic
review revealed some gaps in the literature on coproduction leadership, such as the lack of attention
to the mental complexity of coproduction leaders, the under-representation of service users and
citizens as leaders, and the need for more empirical studies that use appropriate models and methods
to capture the complexity of coproduction leadership. Consider organization You’ve got a focus, and
you’ve stated it clearly and directly. Yet Another Writing Tip When Do I Know I Can Stop Looking
and Move On. Developing inclusive residential care for older lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans (LGBT)
people: An evaluation of the Care Home Challenge action research project. JGCT is rare, and has
characteristic clinical manifestations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1998; Jesson, Jill.
Whether the search is comprehensive or not, whether it involves a methodical approach for data
extraction and synthesis or not, it is important that the review documents in an explicit and
transparent manner the steps and approach that were used in the process of its development. Types
of Literature Review Types of Literature Review are as follows: Narrative literature review: This
type of review involves a comprehensive summary and critical analysis of the available literature on a
particular topic or research question. Theoretical Review The purpose of this form is to examine the
corpus of theory that has accumulated in regard to an issue, concept, theory, phenomena. Further, it
also makes extrapolating findings and commenting on broad themes complex and difficult. Then,
organize the literature according to your chosen structure, and analyze and synthesize the sources.
Evaluate the current “state of the art” for the body of knowledge reviewed, pointing out major
methodological flaws or gaps in research, inconsistencies in theory and findings, and areas or issues
pertinent to future study. Reflecting upon the guiding questions can also help illustrate the extent to
which power and leadership are being shared. Another difference might be in who is doing the
research for the review. What is the effectiveness of printed educational materials on primary care
physician knowledge, behaviour, and patient outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analyses.
Reviewing progress in public involvement in NIHR research: developing and implementing a new
vision for the future. BMJ Open. 2018;8(7):e017124. Byrne L, Stratford A, Davidson L. The review
found that local opinion leaders alone, or in combination with other interventions, can be effective in
promoting evidence?based practice, but this varies both within and between studies and the effect
on patient outcomes is uncertain. Funnel plot showing the effect size on the x-axis and sample size
on the y-axis as a scatter plot. (A) Funnel plot without publication bias. Include each of the key
concepts or variables you’re interested in, and list any synonyms and related terms. You can add to
this list as you discover new keywords in the process of your literature search. However, it is also
where you get to learn about the topic in great detail. MM contributed to data collection and
interpretation, support the drafting, reviewing, and editing of the manuscript. Use Caution When
Paraphrasing When paraphrasing a source that is not your own, be sure to represent the author's
information or opinions accurately and in your own words. Published books may also be helpful, but
keep in mind that peer-reviewed articles are widely considered to be the “gold standard” of scientific
research. Try to analyze the patterns, turning points, and key debates that have shaped the direction
of the field. Point out overall trends in what has been published about the topic; or conflicts in
theory, methodology, evidence, and conclusions; or gaps in research and scholarship; or a single
problem or new perspective of immediate interest. ESL students can request a piece written in simple
English. NOTE: Most often the literature review will incorporate some combination of types. The
way you describe the methods used varies depending on the type of subject of analysis that
constitutes your case study. Source: authors One reviewer extracted data on strategy type, number of
included studies, local, target population, effectiveness and scope of impact from the included
studies. These were social media strategies and toolkits, and multi-faceted interventions (MFIs) (see
Table 2 ). The study examines the impact of consumer ethnocentrism, animosity. By building
relationships with these individuals, you can gain valuable insights and support for your own
research and practice. We developed a comprehensive systematic literature search strategy based on
the terms used in the previous reviews to identify studies that looked explicitly at interventions
designed to turn research evidence into practice. The health system accountability impact of prison
health committees in Zambia. How does the publication relate to other literature in the field.
Preventing cerebral palsy in preterm labour: a multiorganisational quality improvement approach to
the adoption and spread of magnesium sulphate for neuroprotection. Data availability The data
supporting the conclusions of this manuscript will be made available by the corresponding authors on
a reasonable request. You don’t want to substitute a thorough review of core research literature in
your discipline for studies conducted in other fields of study. Survey - find out if similar surveys
have been done before and what did they find. It takes into account the context and complexities of
real-world situations. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination.
Literature reviews provide you with a handy guide to a particular topic. This review provides further
evidence that we need to bring qualitative approaches in from the periphery to play a central role in
many implementation studies and subsequent evidence syntheses. Download Free PDF View PDF
See Full PDF Download PDF Loading Preview Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. Problem-
oriented literature review: This review focuses on a specific problem or issue and examines the
literature to identify potential solutions or interventions. To synthesize information: A literature
review helps to synthesize the information from multiple sources and present a coherent and
comprehensive picture of the current state of knowledge on the topic. The individual component
strategies of the toolkits were highly variable though the authors suggest that they align most closely
with educational strategies. Here are several strategies you can utilize to assess whether you've
thoroughly reviewed the literature: Look for repeating patterns in the research findings. When we
say “literature review” or refer to “the literature,” we are talking about the research ( scholarship ) in
a given field. Avoiding duplication of research: A literature review can help to avoid duplication of
research by identifying what has already been done on a topic, and what remains to be done.
Systematic literature review: This is a rigorous and structured review that follows a pre-defined
protocol to identify, evaluate, and synthesize all relevant studies on a specific research question. A
value of “0” for the MD or SMD indicates that the effects of the new treatment method and the
existing treatment method are the same. You can use our template to summarize and evaluate
sources you’re thinking about using. This approach helps highlight ethical issues which you should
be aware of and consider as you go through your own study. In the template, we cover every section
step by step, with clear, straightforward explanations and examples. This can lead to an incomplete
or biased picture of the literature. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons
licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use,
you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. Google Scholar Adler DD,
Carson PL, Rubin JM, Quinn-Reid D. Click on each section heading to learn more about it. And
don’t forget to tap into your professor’s (or other professors’) knowledge in the field. In any case,
the rest of the work is the hassles of our writing experts. The team could limit data extraction to
minimal essential items. They may also consider re-using descriptive details and findings previously
extracted within previous well-conducted QES ( table 2, item R14). There are many literature
review sample outline examples available online, and many of them have to do with whatever subject
you’re handling. You don’t need to cut each piece by yourself from scratch. Provide the reader with
strong “umbrella” sentences at beginnings of paragraphs, “signposts” throughout, and brief “so
what” summary sentences at intermediate points in the review to aid in understanding comparisons
and analyses. Be sure to thoroughly extrapolate what your analysis of the case can tell the reader
about situations or literature review case study example beyond the actual case that was studied
while, literature review case study example, at the same time, being careful not to misconstrue or
conflate a finding that undermines the external validity of your conclusions. This form of review is
known as qualitative systematic review. The search terms used, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and
any limitations of the search are described. A good starting point could be to look at some examples,
depending on what kind of literature review you’d like to write. Not applicable; according to
Swedish law research, ethical approval is not needed for research that does not involve human
persons. Outcomes related to improvements in health care processes or patient well-being.