Are you struggling with writing a literature review or background of study for your academic paper?

You're not alone. Many students find these sections challenging to navigate, often due to the intricate
nature of academic writing and the specific requirements expected in these sections.

Crafting a literature review requires a thorough understanding of existing research related to your
topic. It involves extensive reading, critical analysis, and synthesis of scholarly works. You must
identify key theories, methodologies, findings, and gaps in the literature to provide a comprehensive
overview of the subject matter.

On the other hand, the background of the study sets the context for your research. It outlines the
historical, theoretical, and conceptual framework within which your study operates. This section
aims to justify the significance of your research and clarify its relevance to the academic field.

Distinguishing between these two sections can be daunting, especially for those new to academic
writing or unfamiliar with the conventions of their discipline. However, getting them right is crucial
for the overall quality and credibility of your paper.

If you're feeling overwhelmed or unsure about how to approach your literature review or background
of study, don't worry. Help is available. Consider seeking assistance from professionals who
specialize in academic writing services.

At ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, we understand the challenges students face when it comes to crafting these
critical sections of their papers. Our team of experienced writers can provide you with custom-
written literature reviews and background of study sections tailored to your specific requirements.

By outsourcing these tasks to ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can save time and energy while ensuring that
your paper meets the highest standards of academic excellence. Our writers are well-versed in various
disciplines and can deliver well-researched, meticulously crafted content that will impress your
professors and contribute to your academic success.

Don't let the complexities of writing a literature review or background of study hold you back. Trust
⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ to provide you with the expert assistance you need to excel in your academic
endeavors. Order now and experience the difference our professional writing services can make!
The blood pressure returned to normal in 13 patients after operation. Development of the Literature
Review Four Basic Stages of Writing 1. During the systematic review process, the quality of studies
is evaluated, and a statistical meta-analysis of the study results is conducted on the basis of their
quality. Writing teachers often say synthesis is like hosting a dinner party: imagine all your sources
are together in a room, discussing your topic. However, when writing a review in the social sciences,
a survey of the history of the literature may be required. It would help if you tried preparing a list of
citations to ensure that there lies no repetition of authors, publications, or articles in the literature
review. 3. Examine and assess the sources It is nearly impossible for you to go through every detail
in the research article. After all, your outstanding performance is our bread and butter. Try to analyze
the patterns, turning points, and key debates that have shaped the direction of the field. Molecular
screening Molecular screening results, performed between 2004 and 2020, were available for 50
cases. Information technology has the post-obit parts: Introduction. Mahassini N.Juxtaglomerular cell
tumor: a distinct mesenchymal tumor of kidney. SciSpace Discover is a one-stop solution to do an
effective literature search and get barrier-free access to scientific knowledge. As shown in Table 1,
the study limitations are evaluated using the “risk of bias” method proposed by Cochrane 2).
Compared with the adjacent renal cortex, the echo pattern is divided into hypoechoic, isoechoic, and
hyperechoic. Meta-analysis implies the deductive enquiry approach used. Thus, literature reviews and
meta-analyses are being conducted in diverse medical fields, and the aim of highlighting their
importance is to help better extract accurate, good quality data from the flood of data being
produced. J Med Genet. 2001.. Hecht JT, Hogue D, Wang Y, Blanton SH, Wagner M, Strong LC,
Raskind W, Hansen MF, Wells D. Find Models Use the exercise of reviewing the literature to
examine how authors in your discipline or area of interest have composed their literature review
sections. To choose a good citation management software, you need to consider which one can be
streamlined with your literature search and writing process. Case of renin-producing Juxtaglomerular
Tumor: effect of ACE inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor antagonist. Like any other research paper,
the literature review format must contain three sections: introduction, body, and conclusion. No
tumor relapse was found in any of the 15 patients during the follow-up of 6 months to 15 years.
Systematic review This form consists of an overview of existing evidence pertinent to a clearly
formulated research question, which uses pre-specified and standardized methods to identify and
critically appraise relevant research and collect, report, and analyze data from the studies included in
the review. For example, a review that examines literature supporting or refuting an argument,
assumption, or philosophical problem related to the research problem will also need to include writing
supported by sources that establish the history of these arguments in the literature. University of
Toronto; Writing a Literature Review. This way the case study is not just an isolated description, but
is integrated into existing knowledge about the topic. Our guides about Evaluating Scholarly Books
and Articles and Evaluating Websites will give you criteria to use when evaluating resources. A value
lower than “0” means the new treatment method is less effective than the existing method, and a
value greater than “0” means the new treatment is more effective than the existing method.
Abbreviations juxtaglomerular cell tumor computed tomography Duan X, Bruneval P, Hammadeh R,
Fresco R, Eble JN, Clark JI, Vigneswaran WT, Flanigan RC. Picken MM.Metastatic juxtaglomerular
cell tumor in a 52-year-old man. Let's outset with the literature review definition.
Fourth, if the results use dichotomous data, the NNT values can be reported, as described above.
State-of-the-Art Review The State-of-the-Art review is conducted periodically, focusing on the most
recent research. Curating and drafting a solid literature review section not only lends more
credibility to your research paper but also makes your research tighter and better focused. However,
because the OR is difficult to interpret, using the RR and RD, if possible, is recommended. A
literature review is a document or section of a document that collects key sources on a topic and
discusses those sources in conversation with each other (also called synthesis ). Filtered Resources
Filtered resources appraise the quality of studies and often make recommendations for practice.
Personality and Individual Differences, 53(1), 16-21. So rather than trying to fetch every detail, you
have to analyze and decide which research sources resemble closest and appear relevant to your
chosen domain. The body of literature includes all studies that address related or identical
hypotheses or research problems. A well-done integrative review meets the same standards as
primary research in regard to clarity, rigor, and replication. A literature review is meant to help your
readers understand the relevance of your research question and where it fits within the existing body
of knowledge. In this section, address the following: a) How the data was collected b) How it was
analysed and c) Explain or justify why a particular method was chosen. You need to follow the
below-mentioned steps, to write a literature review: Outline the purpose behind the literature review
Search relevant literature Examine and assess the relevant resources Discover connections by
drawing deep insights from the resources Structure planning to write a good literature review 1.
Here are several strategies you can utilize to assess whether you've thoroughly reviewed the
literature: Look for repeating patterns in the research findings. The literature review section tends to
be longer for secondary research projects than primary research projects. Your task must be to show
how the academic literature sheds light on your topic. Evidence-Based Research: Levels of Evidence
Pyramid The pyramid includes a variety of evidence types and levels. It may consist of possible gaps
and contradictions in existing researches. Usually, the methodology is written in the past tense and
can be in the passive voice. Formulating research questions A systematic review attempts to gather
all available empirical research by using clearly defined, systematic methods to obtain answers to a
specific question. Taking into consideration the tumor grade, histological information was available
for 103 patients: fifty-nine patients (57%, 37 males and 22 females) had grade 1 SPC; 40 patients
(39%, 33 males and 7 females) had a grade 2 and just 4 patients (3 males and 1 female) had a grade
3. A system for the surgical staging of musculoskeletal sarcoma. For example, if you are reviewing
literature about women and religion, key themes can include the role of women in churches and the
religious attitude towards women. Review, extract the relevant information for eg how the study was
conducted and the findings. However, the application of enhanced ultrasound needs to be based on
the two-dimensional ultrasound localization of the lesion. If your lit review is a standalone piece, the
introduction and conclusion take up more space and give you a place to discuss your goals, research
methods, and conclusions separately from where you discuss the literature itself. The mean age of
diagnosis in grade 1 SPCs was 37 years, 35 years for grade 2 and 38.5 years for the grade 3 cases.
Influential resources: Significant research projects available that have been upheld as milestones or
perhaps, something that can modify the current trends Once you join the dots between various past
research works, it will be easier for you to draw a conclusion and identify your contribution to the
existing knowledge base. 5. Structure planning to write a good literature review There exist different
ways towards planning and executing the structure of a literature review. Literature reviews help
researchers to evaluate the existing literature, to identify a gap in the research area, to place their
study in the existing research and identify future research. The RR and RD can be used for RCTs,
quasi-experimental studies, or cohort studies, and the OR can be used for other case-control studies
or cross-sectional studies. The purpose is to place research in a historical context to show familiarity
with state-of-the-art developments and to identify the likely directions for future research.
If there are differences in the size and format of the outcome variables that cause difficulties
combining the data, such as the use of different evaluation instruments or different evaluation
timepoints, the analysis may be limited to a systematic review. Related reading: How to write the
background of your study 8 Dos and 8 don'ts of writing an engaging study background A young
researcher's guide to writing a literature review How to write a literature review. Quick tips on how
to write a literature review To know how to write a literature review, you must clearly understand its
impact and role in establishing your work as substantive research material. Theoretical literature
review implies gathering theories. For the Q statistic, when the P value of the chi-squared test,
calculated from the forest plot in Fig. 4, is less than 0.1, it is considered to show statistical
heterogeneity and a random-effect can be used. In action research articles, this is also the section
where you will likely find discussions of additional information gathering, or reconnaissance. The
review was also limited by the variable methodologies in the articles reviewed as many included
measures of student self-reported knowledge and preparedness and some articles had mixed samples
that. What are the different types of literature reviews. Even if the median age is in line with
medical literature, the present series highlighted the presence of younger patient affected by
secondary peripheral chondrosarcoma, particularly because some of these cases are grade 2 SPC. The
purpose is to place research in a historical context to show familiarity with state-of-the-art
developments and to identify the likely directions for future research. The pyramid includes a
variety of evidence types and levels. If you want to know more about statistics, methodology, or
research bias, make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.
Don't forget nearly these five C'due south to make things easier in writing a literature review: Cite.
Make referring sources super easy Make referring pages super easy with SciSpace Source To ensure
you don't lose track of your sources, you must start noting down your references when doing the
literature review. Hereditary multiple exostoses: New insights into Pathogenesis, Clinical
Complications, and potential treatments. You can find systematic reviews in these filtered databases:
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Cochrane systematic reviews are considered the gold
standard for systematic reviews. There are a number of different situations where you might write a
literature review, each with slightly different expectations; different disciplines, too, have field-
specific expectations for what a literature review is and does. Does the work ultimately contribute in
any significant way to an understanding of the subject? II. When combining data for dichotomous
variables, the OR, risk ratio (RR), or risk difference (RD) can be used. For example, what might
cultural anthropologists say about the continuing conflict in the Middle East. All authors agree to be
accountable for the work and to ensure the accuracy and integrity of the paper. Overall, 888 OCs that
underwent to surgical intervention at IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli were screened, among them
215 where chondrosarcomas arising from solitary osteochondromas, while 105 (11.82%) were
diagnosed as SPC in MO. Funnel plot adjusted using the trim-and-fill method. If you are not sure,
please consult your advisor or liaison librarians for help. Unleashing the Power of AI Tools for
Enhancing Research, International FDP on. The CCE offers individual consultations, peer writing
groups, workshops and seminars to help you improve your writing. One tumor located in the cortex
with the size of 1.2 cm, showed slightly high density on non-contrast enhanced CT and mild
enhancement during parenchymal phase on contrast enhanced CT. Get the complete picture in no
time SciSpace's personalized informtion engine Source SciSpace Discover’s personalized suggestion
engine helps you stay on course and get the complete picture of the topic from one place. Do not use
extensive quotes as a substitute for using your own words in reviewing the literature. Jie Tang,
MD.Clinical Application of Ultrasound in the diagnosis and treatment of Reninoma.