When it comes to academic writing, one of the most challenging tasks for students is often crafting a

literature review or background section. This part of a research paper or thesis requires a deep
understanding of the existing body of literature on a particular topic, as well as the ability to
critically analyze and synthesize this information into a coherent narrative.

Writing a literature review or background section involves extensive research, meticulous

organization, and careful analysis. It's not simply a matter of summarizing existing studies; rather, it
requires identifying key themes, debates, and gaps in the literature, and positioning your own
research within this context.

One of the main difficulties students face when writing a literature review is the sheer volume of
literature available on most topics. Sorting through countless articles, books, and other sources to
find the most relevant and authoritative sources can be overwhelming. Additionally, synthesizing
this information into a clear and cohesive narrative requires both analytical skills and writing
proficiency.

Another challenge is ensuring that the literature review is not only comprehensive but also up-to-
date. With new research being published constantly, it can be difficult to keep pace with the latest
developments in a field. Moreover, distinguishing between high-quality research and less credible
sources is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the literature review.

Given the complexities involved in writing a literature review or background section, many students
opt to seek assistance from professional writing services. ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers expert
assistance with literature reviews, ensuring that your paper meets the highest standards of quality and
academic rigor. Our team of experienced writers can help you navigate the complexities of the
literature review process, saving you time and ensuring that your paper makes a significant
contribution to your field of study.

In conclusion, writing a literature review or background section is a challenging task that requires
careful research, analysis, and writing skills. For students seeking assistance with this critical aspect
of academic writing, ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers expert support to ensure that your paper is of the
highest quality.
The study inclusion criteria included the diagnosis of JGCT with ultrasound descriptions (at least
size and echo). Methodology Methodology is the approach that you take to gather data and arrive at
the recommendation(s). Clinical Inquiries deliver best evidence for point-of-care use. In summary, a
literature review in empirical research serves as the foundation upon which a new empirical study is
built, helping researchers gain a deep understanding of the existing knowledge in their field, refine
their research questions, and make informed decisions about the research design and methods they
will employ. Related. Historical review Historical literature reviews focus on examining research
throughout a period, often starting with the first time an issue, concept, theory, or phenomenon
emerged in the literature, then tracing its evolution within the scholarship of a discipline. The
research question for the systematic reviews may be related to a major public health problem or a
controversial clinical situation which requires acceptable intervention as a possible solution to the
present healthcare need of the community. Assess the quality of studies The steps undertaken in
evaluating the study quality are early definition of study quality and criteria, setting up a good
scoring system, developing a standard form for assessment, calculating quality for each study, and
finally using this for sensitivity analysis. In our study, the measurement of cap thickness and the
disease severity did not result as statistically related, considering the availability of data was for 69
cases. A random-effect model assumes heterogeneity between the studies being combined, and these
models are used when the studies are assumed different, even if a heterogeneity test does not show a
significant result. The practice of evidence-based medicine is the integration of individual clinical
expertise with the best available external clinical evidence from systematic research and patient's
values and expectations. The quantitative analysis of empirical evidence can use a meta-analysis as
the statistical approach. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research
Imagination. Review not just what scholars are saying, but how are they saying it. Statistical
analysis SPSS 20.0 software was used for statistical analysis. Corresponding author Correspondence
to Marina Mordenti. Next, the reviewers extract the relevant data and assess the quality of the
included studies. The line in the middle is called “the line of no effect.” The weight (in %) in the
fifth column indicates the weighting or influence of the study on the overall results of the meta-
analysis of all included studies. Right Review This tool is designed to provide guidance and
supporting material to reviewers on methods for the conduct and reporting of knowledge synthesis.
Data availability The data supporting the conclusions of this manuscript will be made available by
the corresponding authors on a reasonable request. The documentation contains an excellent
rationale for completing a protocol, too. You can either browse this journal or use the Search within
this publication feature. J Bone Jt Surg. 2013;95(11):377. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I,
Williamson D, Rennie D, et al. However, the application of enhanced ultrasound needs to be based
on the two-dimensional ultrasound localization of the lesion. PRISMA for Scoping Reviews
(PRISMA-ScR) The PRISMA extension for scoping reviews was published in 2018. Literature
search -- finding materials relevant to the subject being explored. 3. Data evaluation -- determining
which literature makes a significant contribution to the understanding of the topic. 4. Analysis and
interpretation -- discussing the findings and conclusions of pertinent literature. We have more BELS-
certified (Board of Editors in the Life Sciences) and CMPP-certified (Certified Medical Publication
Professional) editors and writers than any other company in the world. Literature review samiyah
musallam, Ameenah mohammad, Haya ali, Eman saleh, A. An increase in size of a lesion after
puberty and the presence of pain in adults are signs that raise suspicion of a Secondary Peripheral
Chondrosarcoma (SPC). The images or other third party material in this article are included in the
article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. Two
people should do this step independently, and the third person will resolve any disagreements.
Types of Literature Reviews There are three types of review papers and they’re a follows: 1.
Understanding and Evaluating Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses A systematic review is a
summary of existing evidence that answers a specific clinical question, contains a thorough,
unbiased search of the relevant literature, explicit criteria for assessing studies and structured
presentation of the results. But, if you go about it systematically, you'll be able to save a ton of time
and build a solid foundation for your research. Device-assisted tensioning is associated with lower
rates of graft failure when compared to manual tensioning in ACL reconstruction. Demonstrates your
familiarity with existing knowledge in the field Directs readers to other literature of interest. Your
judgment of the quality of the evidence, including risk of bias. JBI EBP Database (formerly Joanna
Briggs Institute EBP Database) To find critically-appraised topics in JBI, click on Limits and then
select Evidence Summaries from the Publication Types box. Click the 'cite' button on an article page,
and you will receive preloaded citation text in multiple styles — all you've to do is copy-paste it into
your manuscript. Combining studies Homogeneity of different studies can be estimated at a glance
from a forest plot (explained below). The higher the percentage weight, the bigger the box, the more
influence the study has on the overall results. Case studies are commonly used in social, educational,
clinical, and business research. Argumentative Review This form examines literature selectively in
order to support or refute an argument, deeply embedded assumption, or philosophical problem
already established in the literature. In: Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions,
version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. p. 9.2.3.2. Ranganathan P, Pramesh CS, Buyse M.
Thirty-seven patients (28 males and 9 females) inherited the disease from a parent; none of the
females’ patients had recurrence of disease and 3 out of 28 males were found to have a recurrence of
the disease after surgery. From January 2005 to July 2020, fifteen patients diagnosed as JGCT by
surgical pathology in Peking Union Medical College Hospital were collected. You might use just one
complex case study where you explore a single subject in depth, or conduct multiple case studies to
compare and illuminate different aspects of your research problem. The analytical features of a
literature review might: Give a new interpretation of old material or combine new with old
interpretations, Trace the intellectual progression of the field, including major debates, Depending on
the situation, evaluate the sources and advise the reader on the most pertinent or relevant research, or
Usually in the conclusion of a literature review, identify where gaps exist in how a problem has been
researched to date. Is my research topic appropriate for systematic review methods. Dr. NN Chavan
Keynote address on ADNEXAL MASS- APPROACH TO MANAGEMENT in the. A critical
review of qualitative case study reports Study design. Much of your time will go into research, not to
mention you have other assignments to complete. Eminent researcher and academic Arlene Fink, in
her book Conducting Research Literature Reviews, defines it as the following: “A literature review
surveys books, scholarly articles, and any other sources relevant to a particular issue, area of
research, or theory, and by so doing, provides a description, summary, and critical evaluation of
these works in relation to the research problem being investigated. Meta-analysis showed no
statistical difference between groups in hospitalization and mortality. Find Models Use the exercise
of reviewing the literature to examine how authors in your discipline or area of interest have
composed their literature review sections. While conducting a review of the literature, maximize the
time you devote to writing this part of your paper by thinking broadly about what you should be
looking for and evaluating. In our meta-analysis, the age group with higher prevalence was people
aged ?18?years old, while the age group with lower prevalence was those aged Over the past
30?years, numerous strategies addressing HBV have been implemented within China and the
prevalence of HBV has been declining during this period. Countdown to 2030: eliminating hepatitis
B disease, China. A systematic review of published evidence maps and their definitions, methods,
and products.. Meta-analysis: Neither quick nor easy. One tumor located in the cortex with the size
of 1.2 cm, showed slightly high density on non-contrast enhanced CT and mild enhancement during
parenchymal phase on contrast enhanced CT. Validity -- are the author's arguments and conclusions
convincing.
What are the different types of literature reviews. It supports reviewers with study selection, data
extraction and quality assessment. Psychological Aspects of Organ Donation: Individual and Next-
of-. If you continue using our website, you accept our Cookie Policy. Accept. Sometimes a case
study will also collect quantitative data. How you report your findings depends on the type of
research you are doing. This should be planned at the protocol stage itself which is based on good
scientific reasoning and is to be kept to a minimum. For example, you could use EndNote, Microsoft
Word, Excel, and SPSS. Start your free trial Arrange a trial for your organisation and discover why
FSTA is the leading database for reliable research on the sciences of food and health. There are
others from the same area that are not infected. When there is a inconsistency in opinions,
intervention is required via debate or by a third reviewer. Since the thesaurus is designed for the
sciences of food and health, it is the most comprehensive for the field. Rapid reviews streamline the
systematic review process by omitting certain steps or accelerating the timeline They are useful when
there is a need for timely evidence synthesis, such as in response to questions concerning an urgent
policy or clinical situation such as the COVID-19 pandemic Rapid Review Guidebook This
document provides guidance on the process of conducting rapid reviews to use evidence to inform
policy and program decision making. JBI EBP Database (formerly Joanna Briggs Institute EBP
Database) This database includes systematic reviews, evidence summaries, and best practice
information sheets. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the
public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. Indeed, it can take years to conduct and write a
systematic literature review. Understanding and Evaluating Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
A systematic review is a summary of existing evidence that answers a specific clinical question,
contains a thorough, unbiased search of the relevant literature, explicit criteria for assessing studies
and structured presentation of the results. AI tools like SciSpace literature review can help you
compare, contrast, and analyze research papers more efficiently. How to conduct a meta-analysis in
eight steps: a practical guide Thus, this article has two goals: (1) based on the findings of previous
editorials and methodological articles, it defines methodological recommendations for meta-analyses
submitted to Management Review Quarterly (MRQ); and (2) it serves as a practical guide for
researchers who have little experience with meta-analysis as a method but plan to co. As a researcher,
you should use it to set the context, build your argument, and establish the need for your study. The
review was also limited by the variable methodologies in the articles reviewed as many included
measures of student self-reported knowledge and preparedness and some articles had mixed samples
that. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Evidence-based recommendations
for health and care in England. Efficacy of sotrovimab on omicron BA.2, BA.4 and BA.5.
Background: The aim of this meta-analysis was to ascertain whether sotrovimab was effective in
reducing COVID-19 related hospitalization and mortality also in Omicron BA.2, BA.4 and BA.5
subvariants compared to other antivirals effective in index period. The infrequency of malignant
Disease in diaphyseal aclasis and neurofibromatosis. Identification of Theoretical Frameworks: A
literature review aids in identifying relevant theories and concepts that can inform the research
design and data analysis in empirical studies. Or the review might focus on the fundraising impact of
the Internet on a particular political party. A literature review is the effectiveA literature review is the
effective. Sandborn WJ, Rutgeerts P, Enns R, Hanauer SB, et al. A case study is a detailed study of a
specific subject, such as a person, group, place, event, organization, or phenomenon. The review of
the literature is defined as a broad, comprehensive, in-depth, systematic, and critical review of
scholarly publications, unpublished scholarly print materials, audiovisual materials, and personal
communications.
Niranjan Chavan Unleashing the Power of AI Tools for Enhancing Research, International FDP on.
The exclusion criteria were review articles, irrelevant or duplicate papers, and papers without full text
available. Taking into consideration the tumor grade, histological information was available for 103
patients: fifty-nine patients (57%, 37 males and 22 females) had grade 1 SPC; 40 patients (39%, 33
males and 7 females) had a grade 2 and just 4 patients (3 males and 1 female) had a grade 3.
Understanding and Evaluating Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses A systematic review is a
summary of existing evidence that answers a specific clinical question, contains a thorough,
unbiased search of the relevant literature, explicit criteria for assessing studies and structured
presentation of the results. Asking the right question: specifying your study question. Get your seat
closer; let’s get to what you need to know about Empirical Review and Literature Review and their
notable differences. In the regional subgroup, HBsAg positive cases in eastern provinces were
reported in 8 articles, western provinces were reported in 10 articles, and central provinces were
reported in 6 articles. This aids in developing coherence, which is more easily understood even in the
future. It will also help them to choose the most appropriate method for their own study. Case of
renin-producing Juxtaglomerular Tumor: effect of ACE inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor
antagonist. This is followed by an extensive search of the literature and a critical analysis of the
search results. Doing Your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic Techniques. After
removing duplicate articles (691 Chinese and 528 English respectively), there were 2082 articles
remaining. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(1), 16-21. Integrative review It is a type of
literature review focused on building a comprehensive understanding of a topic by combining
available theoretical frameworks and empirical evidence. Investigation on prevalence of HBsAg and
HBsAb in population aged 1 to 69 years in Jiangxi Province in 2020. Randomized controlled trials
are the most common kind of empirical study. For each patient, the Disease-Free Survival (DFS) was
calculated from the date of diagnosis to local recurrence, metastasis (MTS) onset or death as a result
of the disease. Dr. NN Chavan Keynote address on ADNEXAL MASS- APPROACH TO
MANAGEMENT in the. However, the inclusion of studies with any biases or improperly assessed
quality of evidence in systematic reviews and meta-analyses could yield misleading results.
Graphics: centre your graphics, such as diagrams or tables, to have space. When performing a
systematic literature review or meta-analysis, if the quality of studies is not properly evaluated or if
proper methodology is not strictly applied, the results can be biased and the outcomes can be
incorrect. Third, search for the answer to the question from the established research you just read.
Conclusion Almost every research article includes a review of the literature. You can choose the
intellectual lineage you would like to be part of and whose definitions matter most to your thinking
(mostly humanities-specific, but this goes for sciences as well). Selection criteria: State how you’ll
decide which studies to include or exclude from your review. Use sentences and paragraphs with
appropriate use of commas. Device-assisted tensioning is associated with lower rates of graft failure
when compared to manual tensioning in ACL reconstruction. Team members independently evaluate
the studies being considered for inclusion in the review and compare results, adjudicating any
differences of opinion. FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Clinica Espregueira, Porto, Portugal
Joao Espregueira-Mendes Dept.
But, whereas a systematic review can include several research studies to answer a specific question,
typically a meta analysis includes a comparison of different studies to suss out any. Then decide what
information is most relevant to the topic. The following table provides a detailed explanation as well
as the differences between systematic and. I had 5 days to complete my paper and not even a single
chance to do it by myself. In the subgroup analysis of sexes, HBsAg positive cases in males were
reported in 16 articles and females was reported in 17 articles. What is the purpose of a literature
review in empirical research studies. A review team searches for studies to answer the question using
a highly sensitive search strategy. Due to heterogeneity in data collection methods among studies,
there remains a need for systematic surveillance of nationwide HBV prevalence. The second P value
is from the chi-squared test, which tests the null hypothesis for a lack of heterogeneity. Your
instructor may ask you to write a literature review as a standalone assignment. This can be especially
helpful for students or scholars getting into a new research area, or for directing an entire community
of scholars toward questions that have not yet been answered. Structure of report (Site visit) Citing
Sources Tips and Resources The information in the report has to be organised in the best possible
way for the reader to understand the issue being investigated, analysis of the findings and
recommendations or implications that relate directly to the findings. Springer Nature remains neutral
with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. AE performed all
statistical analyses and participated to manuscript drafting. These research methods are powerful
tools that can overcome the difficulties in performing large-scale randomized controlled trials. This
approach should only be followed if a clear path of research building on previous research can be
identified and that these trends follow a clear chronological order of development. FSTA is a key
tool for systematic reviews and systematic literature reviews in the sciences of food and health.
Ethics declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate. HIV risk behavior and HIV testing
among rural and urban men who have sex with men in Zhejiang Province, China: A respondent-
driven sampling study. PLoS One. 2020;15(4):e0231026.. Wang Y, Liu H, Zhao M, Feldman MW,
Williams AB. A systematic review is best deployed to test a specific hypothesis about a healthcare or
public health intervention or exposure. Graphics: centre your graphics, such as diagrams or tables, to
have space. There’s more work related to a systematic literature review, so it makes sense to divide
the work among two or three (or even more) researchers. Abbreviations Hepatitis B virus Hepatitis C
Virus Hepatitis B surface antigen Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-
Analyses China National Knowledge Infrastructure Chinese Biomedical Database Human
Immunodeficiency Virus Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Chronic Hepatitis B Hepatitis
B e-Antigen Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay CLIA-Chemiluminescence Immunoassay
Whiteford HA, Degenhardt L, Rehm J, Baxter AJ, Ferrari AJ, Erskine HE, et al. This process
involves performing a regression analysis of the pooled estimate for covariance at the study level, and
so it is usually not considered when the number of studies is less than 10. Analysis: Explain what
information you’ll collect from the studies and how you’ll synthesize the data. The higher the
percentage weight, the bigger the box, the more influence the study has on the overall results. Data
Extraction Tip 5: Communicate Regularly The Covidence Global Scholarship recipients are putting
evidence-based research into practice. All indexing and abstracting in FSTA is in English, so you can
do your searching in English yet pick up non-English language results, and get those results
translated if they meet the criteria for inclusion in a systematic review. It all depends on the type of
research you are pursuing. Identify conflicts in previous studies, open questions, or gaps that may
exist.
Conducting Research: Literature Search to Writing Review Paper, Part 1: Syste. Literature reviews
are set up similarly to other academic texts, with an introduction, a main body, and a conclusion.
Their chapter on scoping reviews provides a succinct overview of the scoping review process.
Armed with one of the world’s largest in-house editing teams - with over 1400 native English
editors and publication experts who cover 1200 subjects - we provide high-quality English paper
editing services to academic, publishing, and pharmaceutical communities. How will you further
your research as a result of the review? IV. Identification of Variables: It helps identify key variables
and factors examined in previous research, which can guide the selection of variables in the new
study. Conclusions A systematic review is an article that synthesizes available evidence on a certain
topic utilizing a specific research question, pre-specified eligibility criteria for including articles, and
a systematic method for its production. Ideally, clinical decision making ought to be based on the
latest evidence available. A review and quick summary of how to conduct a literature search for your
EA Project. Genotype-phenotype correlation study in 529 patients with multiple hereditary
exostoses: identification of protective and risk factors. Subgroup analysis was used to identify
potential sources of heterogeneity and provided data on HBV infection rates among sub-groups. In
our study, the measurement of cap thickness and the disease severity did not result as statistically
related, considering the availability of data was for 69 cases. What types of sources should I review
(books, journal articles, websites; scholarly versus popular sources)? 3. We’ll help you do everything,
from research and outlining to custom writing and proofreading. Therefore, this analysis does not
report HBV incidence and cannot evaluate which public health programs may have contributed to
observed decreases in HBV prevalence. The higher the percentage weight, the bigger the box, the
more influence the study has on the overall results. There’s more work related to a systematic
literature review, so it makes sense to divide the work among two or three (or even more) researchers.
Example of a mixed methods case studyFor a case study of a wind farm development in a rural area,
you could collect quantitative data on employment rates and business revenue, collect qualitative
data on local people’s perceptions and experiences, and analyze local and national media coverage of
the development. Knowledge gaps: What exactly does it fail to address, and how to bridge them
with further research. The next step is selecting the eligible studies based on similar study designs,
year of publication, language, choice among multiple articles, sample size or follow-up issues,
similarity of exposure, and or treatment and completeness of information. You can use it to discuss
various theories, models, and definitions of key concepts. Each term refers to research about
research, but there are important differences. It might aim to: Exemplify a theory by showing how it
explains the case under investigation Expand on a theory by uncovering new concepts and ideas that
need to be incorporated Challenge a theory by exploring an outlier case that doesn’t fit with
established assumptions To ensure that your analysis of the case has a solid academic grounding, you
should conduct a literature review of sources related to the topic and develop a theoretical
framework. The most interesting literature reviews are often written as arguments (again, as
mentioned at the beginning of the page, this is discipline-specific and doesn’t work for all situations).
Final tips on how to write a literature review A massive chunk of time and effort is required to write
a good literature review. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( ) applies to the
data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. In other words,
a chronological review would have subsections for each vital time period; a thematic review would
have subtopics based upon factors that relate to the theme or issue. Were the point estimates and
measure of variability presented for the primary outcome measure. The documentation provides a
clear overview of scoping reviews. You’ll need to discuss the studies and assess their overall quality.
The margin was clear in eight cases and indistinct in three cases. As for how to draft one, you can
follow the same fundamental idea when preparing an abstract for a literature review. Image analysis
was carried out by two radiologists with more than 5 years of experience with no knowledge of any
clinical information. This is found to be much helpful to understand the existing evidence about the
topic more easily by the reader. Types of Literature Reviews Meta-analysis: Technique that
statistically combines the results of quantitative studies to provide a more precise effect of the
results: Aims for exhaustive, comprehensive searching.. Refers to any combination of methods
where one significant component is a literature review (usually systematic). It consists of a checklist
and a flow diagram, and is intended to be accompanied by the PRISMA 2020 Explanation and
Elaboration document. For example, a review of the Internet’s impact on American presidential
politics could focus on the development of online political satire. In literature review writing,
students have to find and read existing publications such as journal articles, analyze the information,
and then state their findings. An example of an empirical review would be a critical examination of
several recent scientific studies that have investigated the effectiveness of a specific drug in treating
a particular medical condition. Among other objectives, scoping reviews help determine whether a
systematic review of the literature is warranted. Should I summarize, synthesize, or critique sources
by discussing a common theme or issue? 4. Meta-analysis produces a more precise estimate of
treatment effect. Your First Literature Review. 2019 50 Smart Literature Review Templates (APA).
There are several possible reasons why our analysis and the 2017 review identified different patterns
in HBV prevalence by region. In this context, systematic means that the methods used to search for
and analyse the data are transparent, reproducible and defined before searching begins. Mutations in
the EXT1 and EXT2 genes in hereditary multiple exostoses. Ethics declarations Ethics approval and
consent to participate, consent for publication. You must prepare a list of keywords and their
different variations. Using the approriate standard can reassure editors and reviewers that you have
conscienciously carried out your review. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and
Meta-Analyse s: The PRISMA Statement. It is very common for PhD theses to contain some
element of reviewing the literature around a particular topic. Dr. NN Chavan Keynote address on
ADNEXAL MASS- APPROACH TO MANAGEMENT in the. She participated in drafting and in
critical revision of the manuscript. However, we found a comparable amount of studies reporting on
both rural and urban areas, which enhanced the comparability of our findings for rural and urban
areas in our meta-analysis. In general, specific and systematic methods selected are intended to
minimize bias. How to Identify the Research Gap While Writing a PhD Dissertation Literature.
Doing Your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic Techniques. The images or other third
party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated
otherwise in a credit line to the material. Text alternative for Levels of Evidence Pyramid diagram
EBM Pyramid and EBM Page Generator, copyright 2006 Trustees of Dartmouth College and Yale
University. Subscribe to our newsletter You will receive our monthly newsletter and free access to
Trip Premium.