Title: Mastering the Art of Literature Review: Systematic vs.

Narrative Review

Introduction:

Embarking on a literature review journey can be both enlightening and daunting. Whether you're a
seasoned researcher or a student delving into academia, the task of synthesizing existing literature
can feel like navigating through a maze of information. In this article, we explore the nuances
between systematic literature reviews and narrative reviews, shedding light on their differences and
intricacies.

Understanding Systematic Literature Reviews:

Systematic literature reviews are structured methodologies for gathering, evaluating, and
synthesizing existing research on a particular topic. They adhere to a strict protocol, meticulously
outlining search criteria, inclusion/exclusion criteria, and methods for data extraction and analysis.
The aim is to provide an unbiased, comprehensive overview of the available evidence, often
answering specific research questions or addressing gaps in knowledge.

Challenges of Systematic Reviews:

However, conducting a systematic literature review is no easy feat. It requires significant time and
effort to develop robust search strategies, sift through numerous databases, and screen potentially
relevant studies. Moreover, maintaining objectivity throughout the process can be challenging, as
biases may inadvertently influence study selection and interpretation.

Exploring Narrative Reviews:

On the other hand, narrative reviews offer a more flexible approach to synthesizing literature. They
prioritize narrative coherence over methodological rigor, allowing authors to provide insightful
interpretations and contextualizations of existing research. Narrative reviews are particularly valuable
for exploring complex or emerging topics where a systematic approach may be impractical.

Navigating the Decision:

Deciding between a systematic or narrative review depends on various factors, including the research
question, available resources, and desired depth of analysis. While systematic reviews offer
comprehensive and replicable findings, narrative reviews provide rich insights and interpretations that
may inspire further inquiry.

Why Choose ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔?

Navigating the intricacies of literature review writing can be overwhelming, but you don't have to go
it alone. At ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, we specialize in providing expert assistance with academic writing
tasks, including literature reviews. Our team of experienced writers and researchers is dedicated to
delivering high-quality, custom-written papers tailored to your specific requirements.

By entrusting your literature review to ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can save time and ensure that your
work meets the highest standards of academic excellence. Whether you need a systematic review, a
narrative review, or any other type of academic paper, we've got you covered.

Conclusion:

In summary, mastering the art of literature review writing requires a deep understanding of the
nuances between systematic and narrative approaches. While both methods have their strengths and
limitations, the key is to choose the approach that best aligns with your research goals and resources.
And when in doubt, remember that ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ is here to provide the expert assistance you
need to succeed.
This is one of the spa treatments given to the hands and feet. The following table provides a detailed
explanation as well as the differences between systematic and. Systematic Review This form
consists of an overview of existing evidence pertinent to a clearly formulated research question,
which uses pre-specified and standardized methods to identify and critically appraise relevant
research, and to collect, report, and analyze data from the studies that are included in the review. As
shown in Table 1, the study limitations are evaluated using the “risk of bias” method proposed by
Cochrane 2). Analyse the results to obtain answer to the research question. If the studies contain data
on the same topic that can be combined, a meta-analysis can even be performed using data from only
two studies. This guide focuses on systematic reviews in a Health Sciences setting. Text alternative
for Levels of Evidence Pyramid diagram EBM Pyramid and EBM Page Generator, copyright 2006
Trustees of Dartmouth College and Yale University. This refers to the distortion of meta-analysis
outcomes due to the higher likelihood of publication of statistically significant studies rather than
non-significant studies. Case studies are commonly used in social, educational, clinical, and business
research. Then this Project Management Literature Review Example is everything that takes it to start
your own review. Ultrasound could be helpful, however, the ultrasound manifestations of JGCT
have not been fully studied. To differentiate between health education and health promotion To
understand the role of health promotion in disease prevention. Template for systematic literature
review 2019-02-27. Cases from 20 to 40 years old represent the 60% of the cases. The blood
pressure returned to normal in 13 patients after operation. The main difference between literature
review and systematic review is their focus on the research question; a systematic review is focused
on a specific research question whereas a literature review is not. This process involves performing a
regression analysis of the pooled estimate for covariance at the study level, and so it is usually not
considered when the number of studies is less than 10. There are many different research methods
you can use to collect data on your subject. The capsule referred to the fibrous connective tissue
membrane around the tumor, which appeared as a hyperechoic line on ultrasound. A p-value? This
study includes 105 MO - for the large majority Caucasian Italian - patients ??74 male and 31 female
- affected by SPC - that were evaluated at the IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli. For example,
systematic reviews are at the top of the pyramid, meaning they are both the highest level of evidence
and the least common. The level of evidence of the type of summary increases from the systematic
review to the meta-analysis of published data to the pooled reanalysis. Development of the Literature
Review Four Basic Stages of Writing 1. It contains a brief note on literature review including
definition, elements, strategies, and its types. Your professor will probably not expect you to read
everything that's available about the topic, but you'll make the act of reviewing easier if you first
limit scope of the research problem. Were the results effectively interpreted and reported. She
participated in drafting and in critical revision of the manuscript. These terms are often not clearly
allocated in the literature. A systematic review is an objective, reproducible method to find answers
to a certain research question, by collecting all available studies related to that question and
reviewing and analyzing their results.
In a subgroup analysis, the data are divided into subgroups that are expected to be homogeneous,
and these subgroups are analyzed. Virginia Henderson Global Nursing e-Repository An open-access
repository that contains works by nurses and is sponsored by Sigma Theta Tau International, the
Honor Society of Nursing. Types of Literature Reviews It is important to think of knowledge in a
given field as consisting of three layers. Systematic reviews Authors of a systematic review ask a
specific clinical question, perform a comprehensive literature review, eliminate the poorly done
studies, and attempt to make practice recommendations based on the well-done studies. Why
Manual Pen-Testing is a must have for comprehensive application security. CRD’s Guidance for
those Carrying Out or Commissioning Reviews. The sources include government simple reports, IT
software websites, scholarly articles, etc. Try to analyze the patterns, turning points, and key debates
that have shaped the direction of the field. This way the case study is not just an isolated
description, but is integrated into existing knowledge about the topic. Software to help you create
coded data extraction forms from templates include. The serum potassium was normal in these three
patients. Clinical, surgical, and histological features About the site of malignant degeneration, axial
skeleton was involved in 57% of cases. It helps to realise that a “systematic review” is a clearly
defined thing, but ambiguity creeps in around the phrase “systematic literature review” because
people can and do use it in a variety of ways. Color Doppler showed no blood flow in five tumors
with the size range from 0.9 to 2.0 cm, and mild blood flow in six tumors with the size range from
2.8 to 5.9 cm. The preoperative diagnosis was one reninoma, one renal cell carcinoma, and nine
undetermined tumors. If readers indiscriminately accept the results of the many meta-analyses that
are published, incorrect data may be obtained. Nyitrayova O.Juxtaglomerular cell tumor, causing
fetal demise. Study Planning It is easy to confuse systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Guidance
for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach', BMC Medical
Research Methodology, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 143. A patient had a malignant transformation of calcaneal
region OC and another patient at clavicle (Tables 2 and 3 ). In other words, a chronological review
would have subsections for each vital time period; a thematic review would have subtopics based
upon factors that relate to the theme or issue. Does the work ultimately contribute in any significant
way to an understanding of the subject? II. Virtual Forge A Survey On Intrusion Detection Systems
A Survey On Intrusion Detection Systems Mary Calkins Similar to Systematic Literature Review
Sample ( 20 ) Why Manual Pen-Testing is a must have for comprehensive application security. While
the study focuses on one topic, the Internet’s impact on American presidential politics, it would still
be organized chronologically reflecting technological developments in media. When combining data
from continuous variables, the mean difference (MD) and standardized mean difference (SMD) are
used ( Table 2 ). Guidelines are mentioned in this blog provide a good outline for conducting a
systematic review of the literature. 3. This framework especially is essential for early career
researchers and medical students to enhance their writing knowledge on the systematic review of the
literature. At this point consider: Does your study extend current research. Sitemap case study
creative writing presentation problem solving rewiew prompts websites tips. All indexing and
abstracting in FSTA is in English, so you can do your searching in English yet pick up non-English
language results, and get those results translated if they meet the criteria for inclusion in a systematic
review. Rapid reviews differ from systematic reviews in that the process is tailored for a shorter
timeline, but it is still important to use rigorous methodology to ensure that the best available research
evidence is used in decision making. All authors revised the paper critically for intellectual content
and then approved the final version.
Thereafter, the data are reviewed qualitatively and quantitatively. Defining inclusion and exclusion
criteria Information is included on the study design, patient characteristics, publication status
(published or unpublished), language used, and research period. The campbell collaboration was
founded on the principle that systematic reviews on the effects of interventions will inform and help
improve policy and services. The site most frequently affected by malignant degeneration was the
pelvis (46 patients, 44%) with higher incidence in male patients (32 males vs.14 females). The second
one was lower limbs (including femur, fibula, or tibia), identified in 35 patients. In unhappy
thoughts, I might note if the text is fairly hard going and perhaps needs a few reads, or any
contradictions I might have picked up. Systematic reviews follow a defined search plan where the
criteria is clearly stated before the review is conducted. This is one of the spa treatments given to the
hands and feet. However, in many cases, a random-effect model is applied, as described above, and
a subgroup analysis or meta-regression analysis is performed to explain the heterogeneity. Collect
data, integrate the findings and perspectives from different studies and add your own analysis of its
feasibility. Patients and methods Study design and data collection. The introduction lays the
foundation for understanding the research problem and should be written in a way that leads the
reader from the general subject area of the topic to the particular topic of research. Evidence-Based
Research: Levels of Evidence Pyramid The pyramid includes a variety of evidence types and levels.
A literature review is a discussion on the already existing material in the subject area. We have more
BELS-certified (Board of Editors in the Life Sciences) and CMPP-certified (Certified Medical
Publication Professional) editors and writers than any other company in the world. The available
studies in medical literature often did not provide detailed information about malignant
transformation in MO or suffered by some bias; in particular, some studies are based on anonymous
web-based survey, with self-reported information by the patient, without follow-up details. They are
therefore a good way of rapidly obtaining current information on research on a given topic. All
patients underwent preoperative ultrasound examination. Include techniques and any equipment you
used If there were participants in your research, who were they. Data, including age, gender, site,
histological grade, cartilage cap thickness, surgical treatments, surgical margins, genotype mutational
status as well as treatment details were captured from the hospital electronic health records and from
Registry of Multiple Osteochondromas. Cases from 20 to 40 years old represent the 60% of the
cases. Genotype-phenotype correlation in hereditary multiple exostoses. It also ensures neither the
research was done before nor it is a replication study. Corresponding authors Correspondence to He
Liu or Qingli Zhu. You have some chance to do this in your introduction in an article, but the
literature review section gives a more extended opportunity to establish the conversation in the way
you would like your readers to see it. However, the inclusion of studies with any biases or
improperly assessed quality of evidence in systematic reviews and meta-analyses could yield
misleading results. The margin was clear in eight cases and indistinct in three cases. Others are
written in a more narrative style, aiming to explore the case from various angles and analyze its
meanings and implications (for example, by using textual analysis or discourse analysis ). Literature
reviews are designed to provide an overview of sources you have used in researching a particular
topic and to demonstrate to your readers how your research fits within existing scholarship about the
topic. Hereditary multiple exostoses and enchondromatosis. Your professor will probably not expect
you to read everything that's available about the topic, but you'll make the act of reviewing easier if
you first limit scope of the research problem.
This is one of the spa treatments given to the hands and feet. How to identify juxtaglomerular cell
tumor by ultrasound: a case series Purpose To study the value of ultrasound in the diagnosis of
juxtaglomerular cell tumor (JGCT). The patents indexed help find results of research not otherwise
publicly available because it has been done for commercial purposes. The location and size of the
tumors were recorded during surgeries. The Writing Center. University of North Carolina;
Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J. AE performed all statistical analyses and participated to manuscript
drafting. The Systematic Review Process Process of the systematic literature review Appendix S1.
This means that your writing may be extravagant, or you may not be. In the forest plot, as shown in
Fig. 4, greater overlap between the confidence intervals indicates greater homogeneity. Or, does is
merely add more of the same thing being said. Keep a record of the source details of any
information you want to use in your report so that you can reference them accurately. Jennes I, Entius
MM, Van Hul E, Parra A, Sangiorgi L, Wuyts W. Even when paraphrasing an author’s work, you
still must provide a citation to that work. V. Common Mistakes to Avoid These are the most
common mistakes made in reviewing social science research literature. The histological grade was
confirmed or re-assessed as follow: the diagnosis of grade 1 peripheral chondrosarcoma was made
according to the criteria described in the last WHO (2020). Meta-analysis is the use of statistical
methods to summarise the results of independent studies. In all cases, though, make sure to give
contextual details about the case, connect it back to the literature and theory, and discuss how it fits
into wider patterns or debates. In recent years, systematic reviews and meta-analyses have been
actively performed in various fields including anesthesiology. J Med Genet. 2001.. Hecht JT, Hogue
D, Wang Y, Blanton SH, Wagner M, Strong LC, Raskind W, Hansen MF, Wells D. Critically-
appraised topics are like short systematic reviews focused on a particular topic. But hold on! Don’t
quickly jump to the conclusion of a Book review. You will often see the terms “the research,” “the
scholarship,” and “the literature” used mostly interchangeably. Corresponding authors
Correspondence to He Liu or Qingli Zhu. A systematic review is a research study of research studies.
Users will be personally liable for any infringement of Copyright and Licensing laws. Sorted by: 2.
It's likely a sarcastic way of asking you whether you are writing a review study, which is the review
article you intended to write, or a piece of literature, meaning prose, which is likely not what the
editor wants - he wants the article, not a novel. Usually, the methodology is written in the past tense
and can be in the passive voice. In other words, a complete understanding the research problem
requires you to deliberately examine how knowledge and perspectives have changed over time.
Federal government websites often end in.gov or.mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make
sure you’re on a federal government site. All patients underwent preoperative ultrasound
examination. However, study selection via a systematic review is a precondition for performing a
meta-analysis, and it is important to clearly define the Population, Intervention, Comparison,
Outcomes (PICO) parameters that are central to evidence-based research.
Mutations in the EXT1 and EXT2 genes in hereditary multiple exostoses. J Bone Joint Surg Am.
1994.. Laitinen MK, Evans S, Stevenson J, Sumathi V, Kask G, Jeys LM, Parry MC. Give your
interpretation of how and why certain developments occurred (as mentioned previously, this may not
be appropriate in your discipline — check with a teacher or mentor if you’re unsure). Data Analysis
The aim of a meta-analysis is to derive a conclusion with increased power and accuracy than what
could not be able to achieve in individual studies. Finally, the conclusion should summarize the
whole review in a reasonably convincing manner. Click on each section heading to learn more about
it. Critically-appraised topics are like short systematic reviews focused on a particular topic. Many
student writers struggle to synthesize because they feel they don’t have anything to add to the
scholars they are citing; here are some strategies to help you: It often helps to remember that the point
of these kinds of syntheses is to show your readers how you understand your research, to help them
read the rest of your paper. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:966081.. Published 2022 Sep 23. The
morphology was regular in ten cases and irregular in one case. A meta-regression analysis is similar to
a normal regression analysis, except that the heterogeneity between studies is modeled. Usually you
will need to synthesize research rather than just summarizing it. Course, date, etc. info. Learning
Outcomes. Define health promotion Relate the determinants of health to health promotion
interventions Identify types of knowledge provided by health education. Thus, this will require a
collection of published (in print or online) work concerning the selected research area. Systematic
reviews Authors of a systematic review ask a specific clinical question, perform a comprehensive
literature review, eliminate the poorly done studies, and attempt to make practice recommendations
based on the well-done studies. Template for systematic literature review 2019-02-27. For example,
you may include survey questionnaire and results in the appendix. You might use just one complex
case study where you explore a single subject in depth, or conduct multiple case studies to compare
and illuminate different aspects of your research problem. Workshop Overview. Explain elements of
the systematic review process. Genotype-phenotype correlation in hereditary multiple exostoses. The
following table provides a detailed explanation as well as the differences between systematic and
literature reviews. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use. The
main purpose of this type of research is to identify, review, and summarize the best available research
on a specific research question. It explains the function of a literature review and provides guidance
on how to write one. It will use explicit methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise
empirical results from different but similar studies. This is particularly true in disciplines in medicine
and the sciences where research conducted becomes obsolete very quickly as new discoveries are
made. Provides background information on clinical nursing practice. Given below are the main
stages of a systematic review. When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice. A
common mistake when reporting results is, given a z-test P value greater than 0.05, to say there was
“no statistical significance” or “no difference.” When evaluating statistical significance in a meta-
analysis, a P value lower than 0.05 can be explained as “a significant difference in the effects of the
two treatment methods.” However, the P value may appear non-significant whether or not there is a
difference between the two treatment methods.