When it comes to academic research, literature reviews play a crucial role in providing a

comprehensive understanding of existing knowledge on a particular topic. However, crafting a

literature review can be a challenging task, requiring extensive research, critical analysis, and
synthesis of diverse sources. One of the key decisions researchers face is whether to opt for a
systematic or integrative approach to conducting their literature review.

Systematic Literature Review:

A systematic literature review involves a structured and rigorous process aimed at identifying,
evaluating, and synthesizing all relevant studies on a specific topic. This approach follows a
predefined protocol to ensure transparency, replicability, and minimize bias in the selection and
analysis of literature. Researchers systematically search multiple databases using predefined search
terms, screen articles based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and critically appraise
the quality of included studies. The findings are then synthesized to provide an evidence-based
overview of the existing literature, often with a focus on answering specific research questions or
addressing gaps in knowledge.

Integrative Literature Review:

In contrast, an integrative literature review adopts a more flexible and holistic approach to examining
the literature. Instead of following a strict protocol, researchers gather and analyze a diverse range of
sources, including empirical studies, theoretical frameworks, conceptual models, and expert opinions.
The aim is to develop a comprehensive understanding of the topic by synthesizing various
perspectives, theories, and findings. Integrative reviews are particularly useful for exploring complex
or multidisciplinary topics, uncovering patterns or themes across different bodies of literature, and
generating new insights or theoretical frameworks.

Choosing Between Systematic and Integrative Reviews:

Deciding between a systematic or integrative literature review depends on several factors, including
the research question, the scope and nature of the topic, available resources, and the researcher's
preferences and expertise. While systematic reviews are valued for their methodological rigor and
ability to provide robust evidence for decision-making, integrative reviews offer flexibility and
creativity in synthesizing diverse literature to generate new insights or theoretical frameworks.

Order Only on ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔:

Regardless of the approach chosen, crafting a high-quality literature review requires time, expertise,
and attention to detail. If you find yourself struggling with this daunting task, consider seeking
assistance from professionals at ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔. Our experienced writers specialize in
conducting comprehensive literature reviews tailored to your specific requirements and academic
standards. By entrusting your literature review to ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can ensure that your
research is supported by a thorough and well-organized synthesis of relevant literature, ultimately
enhancing the credibility and impact of your work.
It’s very important to keep a meticulous record of why you included or excluded each article. Our
mission is to help students like you to get the grades they need without spending the greater parts of
their lives on the studies. Interpret results: Graph The results of a meta-analysis are usually presented
as a graph called forest plot because the typical forest plots appear as forest of lines. Seroprevalence
of hepatitis B among a 1-69-year-old population in Nanjing city in 2020. Sometimes also referred to
as a traditional literature review. Measures of observer variability (kappa statistic). OSF
Preregistration Initiative This page explains the motivation behind preregistrations and best practices
for doing so. Protocols.io A secure platform for developing and sharing reproducible methods,
including protocols for systematic reviews. Research objective (s): Rephrase your research question
as an objective. Availability of data and materials The datasets used and analyzed during the current
study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Because of this, when
carried out well, they provide reliable estimates about the effects of interventions so that conclusions
are defensible. Annual trends in arthroscopic meniscus surgery: analysis of a national database in
Japan. PLoS One. 2018;13(4):e0194854. During the preparation of this narrative review, the
literature on e-cigarettes available within the network PubMed was retrieved and examined. Hepatitis
B virus infection among 90 million pregnant women in 2853 Chinese counties, 2015-2020: a
national observational study. BMJ Glob Health. 2020;5(6). Zhang SX, Dang RB, Zhang WD, Liang
XF, Cui FQ. Although meta-analysis can increase the precision of a result, it is important to ensure
that the methods used for the reviews were valid and reliable. Subscribe to our newsletter You will
receive our monthly newsletter and free access to Trip Premium. Systematic reviews follow a defined
search plan where the criteria is clearly stated before the review is conducted. Thus, this will require a
collection of published (in print or online) work concerning the selected research area. The first sift is
pre-screening, i.e., to decide which studies to retrieve in full, and the second sift is selection which is
to look again at these studies and decide which are to be included in the review. Wider
implementation of a more comprehensive HBV vaccination program for adults, especially those
living in less economically developed areas, could also address the higher infection prevalence among
older age groups. This kind of work will declutter the landscape of the same things called a different
way and will help correct misinterpretations on different concepts called the same. Think carefully
about how to phrase your search terms and include multiple synonyms of each word. Whereas a
meta-analysis is a quantitative, epidemiological study design used to assess the results of articles
included in a systematic-review. Systematic reviews help avoid complacency so we do more good
than harm. Chapter 6: Choosing effect measures and computing estimates of effect. The results of a
meta-analysis are displayed using a forest plot like the one in figure 3. This involves extensive
planning, and a deliberately designed search strategy that is in tune with the specific research
question. Most integrative reviews are intended to address mature topics or emerging topics. Pamela
Smith Research.pdf Research.pdf ssuser109b9e New microsoft word document (2) New microsoft
word document (2) rajarajeswari suresh Quality issues in mixed methods research (with an emphasis
on teaching) - Ala. Read the articles and decide which articles meet the selection criteria.
Both this meta-analysis and the previous meta-analysis reported a higher prevalence in rural areas
compared to urban areas. Literature reviews give an overview of knowledge on a subject, helping
you identify relevant theories and methods, as well as gaps in existing research. When dealing with
a college application essay, flow is crucial. Extending the I-squared statistic to describe treatment
effect heterogeneity in cluster, multi-centre randomized trials and individual patient data meta-
analysis. The first sift is pre-screening, i.e., to decide which studies to retrieve in full, and the second
sift is selection which is to look again at these studies and decide which are to be included in the
review. The search should be documented as it occurs and changes noted and justified. On the other
hand, when the research topic becomes more focused and aims at finding out if the dietary regime
followed by children during childhood has any relation to childhood obesity then a critical review of
various scholarly sources has to be made. Whereas a meta-analysis is a quantitative, epidemiological
study design used to assess the results of articles included in a systematic-review. In: Cochrane
handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011.
p. 9.2.3.2. Ranganathan P, Pramesh CS, Buyse M. T; Green, Sally, Prof Call Number: W 84.1 C663
2008 ISBN: 9780470699515 Publication Date: 2008. A well-performed systematic review includes a
clinical question that is comprehensively searched over multiple databases by at least two reviewers.
Given the explosion of medical literature, and the fact that time is always scarce, review articles play
a vital role in decision making in evidence-based medical practice. She has been a regular contributor
to Philadelphia Magazine, and her essays have also appeared in Essence. Filtering is important here
as there will be time constraints that prevent the researcher considering every possible piece of
evidence or theoretical viewpoint. Publication bias assessment was tested by Egger’s test and funnel
plot. Bibliographic, word-processing, spreadsheet, and statistical software. Hepatitis B virus:
advances in prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. It’s very important to keep a meticulous record of
why you included or excluded each article. The second column relates to the intervention groups
and the third column to the control groups. The Differences Between a Systematic Review vs Meta
Analysis Understanding the Differences Between a Systematic Review vs Meta Analysis Automate
every stage of your literature review to produce evidence-based research faster and more accurately.
The quality of reporting of systematic reviews is still not optimal. Quality issues in mixed methods
research (with an emphasis on teaching) - Ala. A systematic review is a summary of the medical
literature that uses explicit and reproducible methods to systematically search, critically appraise, and
synthesize on a specific issue. Find out why over 350 of the world’s leading institutions are seeing a
surge in publications since using Covidence. Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, Thuku M, Hamel C,
Moran J, et al. In this presented review, there were 6 studies on rural prevalence and 5 studies on
urban prevalence. However, not all research areas have enough evidence to allow a meta-analysis.
Precisely, the RR of mortality showed no difference in the sotrovimab group compared to treatment
with other drugs (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.10-1.49, p Interpretation: In conclusion, this meta-analysis
showed no significant difference between sotrovimab or other antivirals in reducing COVID-19
evolution in patients with a high risk of progression, considering both hospitalization and mortality.
OR cross organisation OR cross organization OR cross organizational OR.
It is much more than a summary of all the related literature. Toggle Bachelor of Science in Nursing
Prelicensure Bachelor of Science in Nursing Prelicensure. Of retrieved articles, 2026 (61%) articles
were removed after title and abstract screening, and further 31 articles were removed during the full
text screening. Another strategy is to scan the reference lists of relevant studies. Parallel tracks
Parallel interwoven creation tracks. Databases: EMBASE, PsycINFO, AMED, LILACS, and ISI
Web of Science Handsearch: Conference proceedings and reference lists of articles Gray literature:
The Cochrane Library, the metaRegister of Controlled Trials, and the Ongoing Skin Trials Register
Experts: Authors of unpublished registered trials, pharmaceutical companies, and manufacturers of
probiotics Step 4: Apply the selection criteria Applying the selection criteria is a three-person job.
The literature review is an iterative process because you will do at least two of them: a preliminary
search to learn what has been published in your area and whether there is sufficient support in the
literature for moving ahead with your subject. We caught up with some of the winners to discover
the impact of their work and find out more about their experiences. The purpose of this article is to
introduce readers to: The two approaches of evaluating all the available evidence on an issue i.e.,
systematic reviews and meta-analysis, Discuss the steps in doing a systematic review, Introduce the
terms used in systematic reviews and meta-analysis, Interpret results of a meta-analysis, and The
advantages and disadvantages of systematic review and meta-analysis. Gilgun Qualitative Research
and Family Psychology by Jane F. Systematic reviews are suitable for biomedical and healthcare
studies, but they can also be used in other areas that require an evaluation of a specifically defined
subject. Subscribe to our newsletter You will receive our monthly newsletter and free access to Trip
Premium. I don’t know what I would have done without your keen editorial skills. If you want to
know more about statistics, methodology, or research bias, make sure to check out some of our other
articles with explanations and examples. Should our teenagers at risk of offending visit a Prison.
Further research may consider other factors that may explain the source of high heterogeneity among
studies on HBV prevalence in China. These are mostly used in the health and medical field, but they
are not rare in fields such as social sciences and environmental science. Veronica Tanco Tellechea
Leave a reply cancel reply. Therefore, this analysis does not report HBV incidence and cannot
evaluate which public health programs may have contributed to observed decreases in HBV
prevalence. Data is combined and re-analyzed, providing a greater statistical power than any single
study alone. This is a common approach in medical research where several papers might report the
results of trials of a particular treatment, for instance. Literature reviews are set up similarly to other
academic texts, with an introduction, a main body, and a conclusion. Montgomery is the capital and
the birthplace of the Confederate States of America. Part 3: pearls and pitfalls of meta-analyses and
systematic reviews. However, the prevalence of HBV in rural areas and eastern regions was still
higher than the national average. In a meta-analysis, the main objective is to provide more precise
estimates of the effects of a treatment or of a risk factor for a disease, than any of the individual
studies included in the pooled analysis. The sixth column gives the numerical results for each study
(e.g., odds ratio or relative risk and 95% confidence interval), which are identical to the graphical
display in the fourth column. Meta-analysis showed no statistical difference between groups in
hospitalization and mortality. It’s a statistical analysis that combines the results of two or more
studies, usually to estimate an effect size. Outcomes from a meta-analysis may provide more precise
information regarding the estimate of the effect of what is being studied because it merges outcomes
from multiple studies.