When it comes to academic writing, one of the most challenging tasks students face is crafting a

comprehensive literature review. Whether you're a graduate student working on your thesis or a
researcher aiming to contribute to your field, the literature review plays a crucial role in shaping your
work. However, navigating through the vast sea of existing research, synthesizing relevant
information, and presenting it in a coherent manner can be daunting.

A literature review involves not only summarizing existing literature but also analyzing, synthesizing,
and critically evaluating it to identify gaps, contradictions, and areas for further research. This
process requires a deep understanding of the subject matter, strong analytical skills, and the ability to
organize information effectively. Moreover, it involves meticulous attention to detail, as even a small
oversight can impact the credibility and effectiveness of the review.

The challenge becomes even greater when differentiating between a literature review and a
systematic review. While both types of reviews involve examining existing literature, they have
distinct methodologies and objectives. A literature review aims to provide a comprehensive overview
of existing research on a particular topic, while a systematic review follows a rigorous and structured
approach to identify, evaluate, and synthesize all available evidence on a specific research question.

Distinguishing between these two types of reviews requires a clear understanding of their respective
methodologies, criteria for inclusion and exclusion of studies, and methods for synthesizing data. It
demands a systematic approach to literature search, selection, and analysis, as well as adherence to
established guidelines and standards.

Given the complexities and challenges involved in writing a literature review, many students and
researchers seek assistance to ensure the quality and effectiveness of their work. ⇒ StudyHub.vip
⇔ offers professional writing services tailored to meet the specific needs of individuals working on
literature reviews. Our team of experienced writers and researchers specializes in crafting high-
quality literature reviews that adhere to academic standards and contribute to the advancement of
knowledge in various fields.

By ordering from ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can save time and effort while ensuring the quality and
credibility of your literature review. Our expert writers will work closely with you to understand your
requirements, conduct thorough research, and deliver a well-structured and insightful literature
review that meets your academic goals.

Don't let the challenges of writing a literature review hinder your academic or research endeavors.
Trust ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ to provide you with the support and assistance you need to succeed.
Order now and take the first step towards creating a compelling and impactful literature review.
A review is an article that summarizes a number of primary studies and may draw conclusions on the
topic of interest which can be traditional (unsystematic) or systematic. Some meta-analyses also
include subgroup analysis or meta-regression. December 6, 2004. Importance of Conference
Proceedings as Grey Literature. Many first time reviewers, whether they are independent researchers
or undertaking the review as part of a PhD or Professional Doctorate, feel that they benefit from
attending workshops and accessing online training resources offered by some review organizations.
Searching through the literature for relevant sources; Evaluating the findings from your search;
Synthesizing these findings; and Presenting the results. Bias is a systematic deviation from the truth;
it may overestimate or underestimate the true effect, and it may be large or small. A meta-analysis
can help iron out any inconsistencies in data, as long as the studies are similar. Is it a systematic
literature review or a standard literature review. Literature Review, Systematic Review and Meta-
analysis Literature reviews can be a good way to narrow down theoretical interests; refine a research
question; understand contemporary debates; and orientate a particular research project. They
answered the question “What is the effectiveness of probiotics in reducing eczema symptoms and
improving quality of life in patients with eczema?” In this context, a probiotic is a health product
that contains live microorganisms and is taken by mouth. Did the analyses include intention-to-treat
analysis. Plans to analyse the data using these techniques should be described and justified before
looking at the data, ideally at the research plan or protocol stage, to avoid introducing bias. Reply
Delete Replies Sam Young 17 May 2018 at 05:37 This comment has been removed by the author.
Using the above example, this systematic review might be included in a broader OoR which
examines a range of interventions to reduce neurological damage following coronary artery bypass
surgery (Figure 1). Step 2: Develop a protocol A protocol is a document that contains your research
plan for the systematic review. The role of scoping reviews in reducing research waste This article
from the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology looks at how scoping reviews can reduce research waste.
Gray literature: Gray literature includes documents produced by governments, universities, and other
institutions that aren’t published by traditional publishers. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated
guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. Article PubMed PubMed Central
Google Scholar Hall MJ, Schwartzman A, Zhang J, Liu X. Review vs Systematic Review vs ETC -
Nursing Resources. It is often written as part of a thesis, dissertation, or research paper, in order to
situate your work in relation to existing knowledge. People aged ?18?years old showed a higher
HBV prevalence. When multiple studies are addressing the same problem or question, it’s to be
expected that there will be some potential for error. Share This Book Main Navigation Menu
Systematic reviews. PRISMA may also be useful for critical appraisal of published systematic
reviews, although it is not a quality assessment instrument to gauge the quality of a systematic
review. Seminario biologia molecular-Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana. Related Posts: The
Differences Between Pottery and Ceramics What Are The Differences Between Dumplings and
Wontons. Editors will expect you to follow and cite this checklist. North Am J Med Sci. 2011;4(1)
World Health Organization. They often, in fact, identify lack of evidence or knowledge limitations,
and consequently recommend further study, if needed. It’s best if this part is done by two
independent people.
Pre-specified eligibility criteria, to decide which articles will be included or discarded from the
review. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. This question, in and of itself, is
highly focused to match the review of the literature related to the topic at hand. This meta-analysis
of currently available evidence from 2018 to 2022 indicates that China has experienced a decline in
HBV prevalence, transitioning from a higher intermediate area to a medium-low epidemic level.
Where there is a high degree of heterogeneity (variability between studies, either in types of
participants, interventions or outcomes, or study design, risk of bias or results), it may not be
appropriate to combine their results using meta-analysis. If the key findings disappear, then the
conclusions need to be expressed more cautiously. Preventing Juvenile Delinquency: A Systematic
Review p 7. Narrative synthesis combines the findings of multiple studies using words. Natural killer
cells in glioblastoma therapy As seen in a previous blog from Davide, modern neuroscience often
interfaces with other medical specialities. Reduced health literacy about HBV, poorer access to HBV
treatment and disparities in HBV vaccination coverage among rural residents may account for this
observed increased prevalence. A systematic review is also a type of a literature review. Hepatitis B
virus infection among 90 million pregnant women in 2853 Chinese counties, 2015-2020: a national
observational study. Key features from the review protocol are recorded and maintained as a
permanent record. Conclusions A systematic review is an article that synthesizes available evidence
on a certain topic utilizing a specific research question, pre-specified eligibility criteria for including
articles, and a systematic method for its production. As for the subgroup of age groups, HBsAg
positive cases in people aged ?18?years old were reported in 14 articles and people We systematically
evaluated peer-reviewed studies published in English or Chinese describing HBV prevalence in
China from 2018 to 2022 to provide an updated meta-analysis from a previous meta-analysis. To
ensure the validity of our meta-analysis findings, the surveillance reports were excluded due to
insufficient reporting of data sources and variations in data collection methods or statistical
approaches across different reports. What Is the Difference Between a Systematic Review and a
Meta-analysis 17 Citations Abstract Distinguishing between a systematic review and meta-analysis is
essential to understand the role each plays in presenting and analysing data and estimates of
treatment effects. It is easy to understand how this well-documented tendency can skew a review’s
findings, but someone conducting a systematic literature review in the loose sense of the phrase
might, for lack of resource or capacity, forgo that step. Publication and level of evidence trends in the
American journal of sports medicine from 1996 to 2011. So, here in this systematic review vs
literature review comparison piece, we’ve given you all that you need to know about these review
types and where you should use them. Glad you liked it - the author's of the article did a great job,
didn't they!:-D Delete Replies Reply Reply Add comment Load more. Wider implementation of a
more comprehensive HBV vaccination program for adults, especially those living in less
economically developed areas, could also address the higher infection prevalence among older age
groups. This suggests that in the future, HBV prevention focus should be on the highest-prevalence
areas and high-risk populations. It’s best if this part is done by two independent people. This work
was supported by the internal grant of the Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Macau. A
systematic review, however, includes entirely different components that reflect the specificity of its
research question, and the requirement for transparency and inclusion. Twenty-five articles were
included in the meta-analysis. By application of scientific strategies, it is possible to minimize error
and bias to provide a more reliable and precise estimate of an intervention’s effectiveness. In
addition, they are normally collated and appraised by an independent panel of experts in the field.
The higher the percentage weight, the bigger the box, the more influence the study has on the overall
results.
The provincial and city scale surveys of HBV prevalence in the general population in China could be
expanded, where possible. Asking the right question: specifying your study question. In:
Espregueira-Mendes, J., Karlsson, J., Musahl, V., Ayeni, O.R. (eds) Orthopaedic Sports Medicine.
This is where the researcher shows his knowledge on the subject area he or she is researching on.
Data exported from Covidence can be saved in Excel for reliable transfer to your choice of data
analysis software or, if you’re writing a Cochrane Review, to RevMan 5. In short, the evidence
against or for the question at hand is summarized. Next, the reviewers extract the relevant data and
assess the quality of the included studies. Primary care physicians need evidence for both clinical
practice and for public health decision making. A similar tactic is then followed to analyze and
collect information that might be of use in the review form of the selected research. Data Extraction
Tip 5: Communicate Regularly The Covidence Global Scholarship recipients are putting evidence-
based research into practice. Or several studies on the effects of a treatment might come to different
conclusions. It helps to improve the precision in estimating the risk by using explicit methods.
Performing systematic literature reviews with novices: An iterative approach. Systematic reviews
typically answer their research question by synthesizing all available evidence and evaluating the
quality of the evidence. Similar to a systematic review, a scoping review is a type of review that tries
to minimize bias by using transparent and repeatable methods. A meta-analysis is a mathematical
synthesis of the results of two or more primary studies that addressed the same hypothesis in the
same way. Quality issues in mixed methods research (with an emphasis on teaching) - Ala. The
retrieved studies are then screened for eligibility using the inclusion and exclusion criteria (this is
done by at least two people working independently). Chronic maternal hepatitis B virus infection
and pregnancy outcome-a single center study in Kunming. Similarly, a well-conducted systematic
review might not have been recently updated and its findings might not therefore be based on
current primary research. Among the available electronic scientific database, the popular ones are
PUBMED, MEDLINE, and EMBASE. The results of a meta-analysis are displayed using a forest
plot like the one in figure 3. Language Editing Plus With Elsevier’s Language Editing Plus services,
you can relax with our complete language review of your systematic literature review or literature
review, or any other type of manuscript or scientific presentation. As such the organization you
choose to work with, or your own team or reviewers, should have strong input from relevant groups
with appropriate expertise that can provide you with peer review and team members in order to
achieve your review. Usually, another team does the screening process using the inclusion and
exclusion criteria. Narrative synthesis combines the findings of multiple studies using words.
Hepatitis B virus infection: epidemiology and vaccination. This kind of networking can be
instrumental in acquiring the diverse skill mix required of coauthors to produce a well-researched and
relevant review. Further Reading: Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. A
systematic literature review would contrast with what is sometimes called a narrative or journalistic
literature review, where the reviewer’s search strategy is not made explicit, and evidence may be
cherry-picked to support an argument.
The second column relates to the intervention groups and the third column to the control groups. In
our meta-analysis, the age group with higher prevalence was people aged ?18?years old, while the
age group with lower prevalence was those aged Over the past 30?years, numerous strategies
addressing HBV have been implemented within China and the prevalence of HBV has been
declining during this period. One strategy is to scan relevant journals or conference proceedings. It
allows the findings of different reviews relevant to a review question to be compared and
contrasted. Studies were limited to those recruited using random sampling approaches to minimize
the risk of section bias in the estimates of HBV prevalence rates. For example, you could use
EndNote, Microsoft Word, Excel, and SPSS. Secondly, even if a systematic review has been well-
conducted it might have identified significant limitations or gaps in the current evidence base, and
rightly recommend that its findings are interpreted with caution (although this is a good rationale for
conducting some new research!). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (n.d.). Systematic
Reviews. This blog presents the three types of heterogeneity, considers the different types of
outcome data, and delves a little more into dealing with the variations. Aggregative methods
produce effect sizes or percentages across studies (such as meta-summary). Traditional reviews vs
systematic reviews - Students 4 Best Evidence. It is not unusual to exclude large numbers of studies
retrieved from the original search once the inclusion and exclusion criteria are fully considered.
Twenty years of meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery: has quality kept up with quantity. In:
Espregueira-Mendes, J., Karlsson, J., Musahl, V., Ayeni, O.R. (eds) Orthopaedic Sports Medicine.
Two of you will independently read the studies and decide which to include in your review based on
the selection criteria you established in your protocol. Guidance Notes for Registering A Systematic
Review Protocol with PROSPERO OSF Registries Open Science Framework (OSF) Registries is an
open network of study registgrations and pre-registrations. However, we both found the prevalence
of HBV increased with age. The prevalence rate was higher in males compared to females, higher in
rural areas than in urban areas, and higher in western regions than in central and eastern regions.
Under the most rigorous study design conditions, a well-planned single study, even if prospective
and randomized, rarely provides definitive results, and primary studies tend to overestimate
treatment effects. PRISMA for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) The PRISMA extension for
scoping reviews was published in 2018. For example, a focused question related to medical or
clinical outcomes. Searching through the literature for relevant sources; Evaluating the findings from
your search; Synthesizing these findings; and Presenting the results. Commonly for systematic
reviews of the effectiveness of treatments, the question will follow a “PICOS” format (to define the
Population, Intervention(s), Comparison(s), Outcomes and Study designs of interest to the review).
We performed an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to identify new studies published
since 2018 and to describe trends in HBV prevalence in China. In a recent review of 300 systematic
reviews, few authors reported assessing possible publication bias even though there is overwhelming
evidence both for its existence and its impact on the results of systematic reviews. Two people
should do this step independently, and the third person will resolve any disagreements. Systematic
Literature Review or Literature Review Systematic Literature Review vs Meta Analysis. Although
advice to place infants on their backs to sleep was widely available in the early 1990s, the authors of
the sudden infant death syndrome study showed that the mortality benefit of this sleep position
would have been apparent if a systematic review had been performed any time after 1970 (Gilbert et
al., 2005). Such a review potentially could have saved 60,000 infant lives in the United Kingdom,
Europe, the United States, and Australia. Data exported from Covidence can be saved in Excel for
reliable transfer to your choice of data analysis software or, if you’re writing a Cochrane Review, to
RevMan 5. However, you should justify why a quantitative approach wasn’t possible.
A systematic literature review would contrast with what is sometimes called a narrative or
journalistic literature review, where the reviewer’s search strategy is not made explicit, and evidence
may be cherry-picked to support an argument. However, all good research should begin and end with
a systematic review and all available studies should be assessed, even if an apparently “definitive”
trial is available. Understanding and Evaluating Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses A
systematic review is a summary of existing evidence that answers a specific clinical question,
contains a thorough, unbiased search of the relevant literature, explicit criteria for assessing studies
and structured presentation of the results. Work-role of Radiation Therapists in the Consequences of
Adaptive Radiotherap. Seroprevalence for hepatitis B infection among children aged 8 months to 14
years in Yunnan province, 2019. If you want to know more about statistics, methodology, or research
bias, make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples. JBI Manual
for Evidence Synthesis The JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis is designed to provide authors with
a comprehensive guide to conducting JBI systematic reviews. Writing a good review article Input
your search keywords and press Enter. Performing systematic literature reviews with novices: An
iterative approach. Webinar 50 shades of review eahil cpd pilot program. Meta-analysis is a statistical
method used to combine the results of individual studies. Education, IEEE Transactions on, August
2014, Volume 57, issue 3 (pp. 175-181). Amanda Hodgson, MLIS Sarah Normandin, BSc, MLIS CE
Course May 26, 2008 CHLA 2008. Reply Delete Replies Sam Young 17 May 2018 at 05:37 This
comment has been removed by the author. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis Subgroup
analysis looks at the results of different subgroups of trials, e.g., by considering trials on adults and
children separately. Descriptive Vs. Inferential Statistics: The Main Differences. Key features from
the review protocol are recorded and maintained as a permanent record. A review is an article that
summarizes a number of primary studies and may draw conclusions on the topic of interest which
can be traditional (unsystematic) or systematic. Registering your protocol means submitting it to a
database such as PROSPERO or ClinicalTrials.gov. Step 3: Search for all relevant studies Searching
for relevant studies is the most time-consuming step of a systematic review. This is something that
needs to be paid careful attention to. Health Sci Rep. 2020;3(3):e178.. Page MJ, Sterne JA, Higgins
JP, Egger M. Hepatitis B seroprevalences among a 1-69-year-old population of Qinghai province in
2020. An annotated bibliography is a list of source references that has a short description (called an
annotation ) for each of the sources. MOOSE Guidelines Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in
Epidemiology checklist contains specifications for reporting of meta-analyses of observational
studies in epidemiology. These can be particularly useful for informing policy decisions about which
interventions are most effective. The 7 steps for conducting a systematic review are explained with
an example. Federal government websites often end in.gov or.mil. Before sharing sensitive
information, make sure you’re on a federal government site. Right Review This tool is designed to
provide guidance and supporting material to reviewers on methods for the conduct and reporting of
knowledge synthesis. It supports reviewers with study selection, data extraction and quality
assessment. This presented review had fewer studies on the prevalence of HBV in rural and urban
areas, which would lead to a reduction in HBV prevalence in rural and urban areas.