When embarking on a research project, one crucial aspect is conducting a thorough review of

existing literature relevant to the topic at hand. This process involves delving into a vast sea of
scholarly articles, books, and other resources to gain a comprehensive understanding of the subject
matter. However, many researchers find themselves grappling with the complexities and challenges
inherent in writing a literature review.

Crafting a literature review is far from a simple task. It requires meticulous attention to detail, critical
analysis, and synthesis of diverse sources of information. Researchers must sift through a myriad of
publications, discerning which ones are most relevant and credible for inclusion in their review.
Moreover, they must analyze and interpret the findings of these studies, identifying patterns,
inconsistencies, and gaps in the existing literature.

One of the primary difficulties in writing a literature review lies in the sheer volume of material
available. With the exponential growth of scholarly publications in virtually every field, researchers
can easily become overwhelmed by the sheer magnitude of literature to be reviewed. Moreover,
distinguishing between high-quality research and less reliable sources can be a daunting task,
requiring careful scrutiny and evaluation of each study's methodology, findings, and theoretical
framework.

Another challenge researchers often face is synthesizing the information gathered from disparate
sources into a coherent and cohesive narrative. A literature review is not simply a laundry list of
studies but rather a synthesis of existing knowledge that provides insights into the research question
or problem at hand. This process demands critical thinking skills, the ability to identify connections
between different studies, and the capacity to articulate these connections effectively.

Given the complexities and challenges associated with writing a literature review, many researchers
find themselves in need of assistance. ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers a solution to this dilemma,
providing professional writing services tailored to meet the specific needs of researchers. Our team
of experienced writers specializes in crafting high-quality literature reviews that adhere to the highest
academic standards. By entrusting your literature review to ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can rest
assured that your project will receive the attention to detail and expertise it deserves.

In conclusion, writing a literature review is a challenging yet essential aspect of the research process.
It requires researchers to navigate a vast landscape of scholarly literature, critically evaluate sources,
and synthesize information into a cohesive narrative. For those in need of assistance, ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers a reliable solution, providing expert writing services tailored to meet your
specific needs. Trust ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ to deliver a literature review that meets the highest
standards of quality and professionalism.
Taken together, contrast enhanced CT should be considered in all cases of JGCT. The Cox
proportional hazard model was used to estimate the Hazard ratios (HRs). If you need an
undergraduate-level essay for college, you don’t need to overpay for a Ph.D. degree-holding expert.
Sometimes you may need to quote certain terminology that was coined by the author, is not common
knowledge, or taken directly from the study. This finding highlights the need of a personalization of
follow-up management for young borderline cases. By browsing the website, you agree to it. Read
more. Fifty-four patients were between 30 and 49 years old (56.7%); the most affected site is the
pelvis (26 subjects), followed by 11 patients with involvement at femur. What is a Literature
Review?. “. a literature review uses as its database reports of primary or original scholarship, and
does not report new primary scholarship itself.”. Finding and reviewing hr literature and information
sources for PhD hr disser. In nearly all cases, literature reviews are written in the third person.
Sometimes when people talk about a “systematic literature review”, they are using the phrase
interchangeably with “systematic review”. Chondrosarcoma: a clinicopathologic and statistical
analysis. Cancer. 1980. (19800101)45:1 3.0.co;2-a. Hennekam RC. Hereditary multiple exostoses.
However, it is easy to get confused between them while writing your manuscript. Every member of
our team works according to a strict honor code compiled of 5 main guarantees in order to ensure
the best customer experience for you, our clients. Moreover, our results show that a worse course of
the disease is associated with higher histological grade. Federal government websites often end
in.gov or.mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
To see how to use the limit and find full text, please see our Joanna Briggs Institute Search Help
page. When you have multiple sources cited in a paragraph, you are more likely to be synthesizing
them (not always, but often Read more about synthesis here. Case of renin-producing
Juxtaglomerular Tumor: effect of ACE inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor antagonist. Use Evidence
A literature review section is, in this sense, just like any other academic research paper. If you want
to know more about statistics, methodology, or research bias, make sure to check out some of our
other articles with explanations and examples. However, you can also choose a more common or
representative case to exemplify a particular category, experience or phenomenon. In this paper we
describe clinical and histological findings and genetic background of a large series of SPC in MO
patients. The age at diagnosis of SPC ranges from 13 to 63, with median age at diagnosis of 34
years. J Med Genet. 1983.. Pritchard DJ, Lunke RJ, Taylor WF, Dahlin DC, Medley BE. By reading
a quick preview of each source (and taking note of recurring authors, contributors, and citations) you
can pare down your list to a collection of works that provide the data, insights, and additional
content you need to conduct your research. I had 5 days to complete my paper and not even a single
chance to do it by myself. One tumor located in the cortex with the size of 1.2 cm, showed slightly
high density on non-contrast enhanced CT and mild enhancement during parenchymal phase on
contrast enhanced CT. A systematic review is generally conducted by a team including an
information professional for searches and a statistician for meta-analysis, along with subject experts.
You should always look at examples from your own discipline and talk to professors or mentors in
your field to be sure you understand your discipline’s conventions, for literature reviews as well as
for any other genre.
The grayscale and Color Doppler images of each patient were acquired and saved by radiologists
with more than 5 years of experience in ultrasound examination. The figure depicts individual trials
as filled squares with the relative sample size and the solid line as the 95% confidence interval of the
difference. I received a completed paper in two days and submitted it to my tutor on time. You can
use it to discuss various theories, models, and definitions of key concepts. In recent years,
systematic reviews and meta-analyses have been actively performed in various fields including
anesthesiology. Sandborn WJ, Rutgeerts P, Enns R, Hanauer SB, et al. Related reading: How to
write the background of your study 8 Dos and 8 don'ts of writing an engaging study background A
young researcher's guide to writing a literature review How to write a literature review. Write what is
already known about the topic and what do the sources that you have reviewed say. Even when
paraphrasing an author’s work, you still must provide a citation to that work. V. Common Mistakes
to Avoid These are the most common mistakes made in reviewing social science research literature.
Here are some examples: Chronological: The simplest approach is to trace the development of the
topic over time, which helps familiarize the audience with the topic (for instance if you are
introducing something that is not commonly known in your field). Time Management:
Accomplishing Difficult Tasks and Maintaining Momentum 9. Defining inclusion and exclusion
criteria Information is included on the study design, patient characteristics, publication status
(published or unpublished), language used, and research period. Every member of our team works
according to a strict honor code compiled of 5 main guarantees in order to ensure the best customer
experience for you, our clients. How to identify juxtaglomerular cell tumor by ultrasound: a case
series Purpose To study the value of ultrasound in the diagnosis of juxtaglomerular cell tumor
(JGCT). You can find systematic reviews in these filtered databases: Cochrane Database of
Systematic Reviews Cochrane systematic reviews are considered the gold standard for systematic
reviews. A meta-regression analysis is similar to a normal regression analysis, except that the
heterogeneity between studies is modeled. Here are examples of other sections, usually in the form
of a single paragraph, you may need to include depending on the type of review you write: Current
Situation: Information necessary to understand the current topic or focus of the literature review.
Consider Whether Your Sources are Current Some disciplines require that you use information that is
as current as possible. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research
Imagination. Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices. Corresponding
authors Correspondence to He Liu or Qingli Zhu. AE performed all statistical analyses and
participated to manuscript drafting. A summary is a recap of the important information of the source,
but a synthesis is a re-organization, or a reshuffling, of that information in a way that informs how
you are planning to investigate a research problem. If material is not included in the article’s Creative
Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the
permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. It can be an
embedded introduction in your paper, or relevant parts of the review can appear in appropriate
sections of the document. If the studies contain data on the same topic that can be combined, a
meta-analysis can even be performed using data from only two studies. One method of evaluating the
quality of evidence in non-randomized studies is the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, provided by the
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute 1). Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional
claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Systematic reviews Authors of a systematic
review ask a specific clinical question, perform a comprehensive literature review, eliminate the
poorly done studies, and attempt to make practice recommendations based on the well-done studies.
Title: Adalimumab Induction Therapy for Crohn’s Disease Previously Treated with Infliximab.
Their qualifications and expertise allow them quickly and sharply grasp the requirements and develop
consistent papers. You can find critically-appraised topics in these resources: Annual Reviews This
collection offers comprehensive, timely collections of critical reviews written by leading scientists.
The natural history of hereditary multiple exostoses. A synopsis is a summary of the essential data of
the source. The margin was clear in eight cases and indistinct in three cases. The difference between
annotated bibliography and literature review lies in the way they present information. It is easy to
understand how this well-documented tendency can skew a review’s findings, but someone
conducting a systematic literature review in the loose sense of the phrase might, for lack of resource
or capacity, forgo that step. For over a decade of operations, PaperHelp honed its problem-fixing
skills to perfection, becoming one of the most effective and reliable writing help services favored by
US students. Nevertheless, the real incidence, the age of onset, and the specific risk factors for
chondrosarcoma development in MO are at present not well assessed. In 6 patients with recurrence
of the disease, molecular analysis was available and about equal distribution of variants on EXT1 and
EXT2 genes was observed. This is called citation tracking and there are a number of sources that can
help you identify who has cited whom, particularly scholars from outside of your discipline.
Genotype-phenotype correlation study in 529 patients with multiple hereditary exostoses:
identification of protective and risk factors. Only 6 patients were older than 50 years had a grade 2
or 3 lesion. You can find critically-appraised individual articles in these resources: EvidenceAlerts
Quality articles from over 120 clinical journals are selected by research staff and then rated for
clinical relevance and interest by an international group of physicians. So, in case you were assigned
a 600-word paper (that makes a 3-page order), you can request a text of 550 words (that makes 2
pages) and then add several sentences by yourself, hence saving a 1-page cost. Fink, Arlene.
Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper. The goal is to deliberately
document, critically evaluate, and summarize scientifically all of the research about a clearly defined
research problem. Google Scholar Adler DD, Carson PL, Rubin JM, Quinn-Reid D. LW and ML
collected and analyzed the data, then wrote the manuscript; SJ, YO, FW, and KL provided
professional opinions about JGCT and ultrasound manifestations; JL and YJ revised the manuscript;
HL and QZ designed and supervised the study. Formulating research questions A systematic review
attempts to gather all available empirical research by using clearly defined, systematic methods to
obtain answers to a specific question. The serum potassium was normal in these three patients.
Systematic reviews are used by professional associations and government agencies to issue
guidelines and recommendations; such important activities are rarely based on a non-systematic
review. Thirty-seven patients (28 males and 9 females) inherited the disease from a parent; none of
the females’ patients had recurrence of disease and 3 out of 28 males were found to have a
recurrence of the disease after surgery. The investigation found that brighter in-store lighting. As our
understanding of evidence-based medicine increases and its importance is better appreciated, the
number of systematic reviews and meta-analyses will keep increasing. Statistical analysis SPSS 20.0
software was used for statistical analysis. Kiwanis International, Cal-Nev-Ha District 2013 Key Club
District Convention. KEY LEADER. Of the 4 lesions missed by ultrasound, two tumors located in
the cortex, with the size of 1.0 and 1.2 cm respectively, showed similar density with the cortex on
non-contrast enhanced CT and mild enhancement during parenchymal phase on contrast enhanced
CT. The area of the squares represents the weight reflected in the meta-analysis. Am J Hum Genet.
1998.. Download references Acknowledgements Eleven authors of this publication are members of
the European Reference Network for rare BONe Diseases (ERN BOND).
While case studies focus more on concrete details than general theories, they should usually have
some connection with theory in the field. Selection Methods: Criteria you used to select (and
perhaps exclude) sources in your literature review. Louis Region Shapley Tech Talk - SHAP and
Shapley Discussion Shapley Tech Talk - SHAP and Shapley Discussion Dr. NN Chavan Keynote
address on ADNEXAL MASS- APPROACH TO MANAGEMENT in the. The black diamond
represents the OR and 95% confidence interval calculated across all the included studies. Literature
Review vs Systematic Review It's common to confuse systematic and literature reviews because
both are used to provide a summary of the existent literature or research on a specific topic.
Academic composing should give the peruser an educated contention for Writing Services PhD
Literature Review. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The
clinical, laboratory, ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), surgical, and pathological features of
the patients were analyzed retrospectively. Compared with the adjacent renal cortex, the echo pattern
is divided into hypoechoic, isoechoic, and hyperechoic. The following table provides a detailed
explanation as well as the differences between systematic and literature reviews. A meta-regression
analysis is similar to a normal regression analysis, except that the heterogeneity between studies is
modeled. Reasons for Conducting a Literature Review Goals of a Literature Review Contents of a
Literature Review Examples. Conducting Research: Literature Search to Writing Review Paper, Part
1: Syste. The 15 patients were 5 males and 10 females with a median age of 29 years (10 ? 72 years).
14 of them had hypertension and one had normal blood pressure. Look at sources the authors cite to
in their work. Psychological Aspects of Organ Donation: Individual and Next-of-. In other words, a
chronological review would have subsections for each vital time period; a thematic review would
have subtopics based upon factors that relate to the theme or issue. In many cases, an abstract’s goal
is to engage readers and help researchers and cataloguers determine whether your work is a relevant
source for their work and whether it’s a good fit for a specific collection or academic journal.
However, you can also choose a more common or representative case to exemplify a particular
category, experience or phenomenon. Case studies are good for describing, comparing, evaluating
and understanding different aspects of a research problem. Consider the following issues before
writing the literature review: Clarify If your assignment is not specific about what form your
literature review should take, seek clarification from your professor by asking these questions: 1.
This approach should only be followed if a clear path of research building on previous research can
be identified and that these trends follow a clear chronological order of development. The methods
for this process also need to be planned in advance. When combining data from continuous variables,
the mean difference (MD) and standardized mean difference (SMD) are used ( Table 2 ). What
evidence has led to a particular claim being made. Following are body paragraphs that explain your
research in further detail. Fink, Arlene. Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet
to Paper. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2005; Hart, Chris. Further Readings Generative AI and
Writing USC Libraries Tutorials and Other Guides Bibliography A literature review surveys prior
research published in books, scholarly articles, and any other sources relevant to a particular issue,
area of research, or theory, and by so doing, provides a description, summary, and critical evaluation
of these works in relation to the research problem being investigated. It causes you to comprehend
the advantages and disadvantages of the cases communicated in the diaries, from more than one
creator’s perspective. A review organized in this manner would shift between time periods within
each section according to the point being made.