Unlocking the Challenges of Crafting a Narrative Literature Review

Embarking on the journey of writing a narrative literature review can often feel like navigating
through a labyrinth of scholarly dialogue, theories, and findings. This endeavor, integral to the
foundation of academic research and discussion, presents a unique set of challenges that can be both
intellectually stimulating and daunting.

The Complexity of Synthesis

One of the primary difficulties encountered in constructing a narrative literature review lies in the
synthesis of vast amounts of information. Researchers must sift through extensive bodies of work,
identify relevant studies, and weave them together into a coherent narrative. This process not only
demands a deep understanding of the topic at hand but also requires the skill to discern patterns,
themes, and gaps within the literature. The challenge intensifies with the need to present this
synthesis in a manner that is both engaging and informative, catering to the needs of a diverse
academic audience.

Balancing Breadth and Depth

Achieving the delicate balance between breadth and depth is another hurdle. A narrative literature
review must cover a wide range of literature to provide a comprehensive overview of the topic.
However, it also needs to delve deeply into specific studies to highlight their contributions,
methodologies, and findings. Striking this balance is no small feat, as it involves making tough
decisions about which studies to include and how much detail to provide about each one.

Maintaining Objectivity and Criticality

Maintaining an objective and critical stance throughout the review adds another layer of complexity.
Researchers are tasked with not only summarizing existing literature but also critically evaluating it,
identifying biases, methodological flaws, and areas where the research is lacking. This requires a high
level of analytical skill and the ability to engage critically with the material, challenging established
ideas and proposing new perspectives.

Navigating the Evolving Landscape of Research

The ever-evolving nature of research presents its own set of challenges. Keeping abreast of the latest
studies, theories, and debates within a field is essential for a narrative literature review to be relevant
and valuable. However, with new research being published continuously, there is always the risk that
the review might become outdated soon after its completion. This demands not only a commitment
to ongoing learning but also a strategic approach to selecting literature that will stand the test of time.

The Solution to Your Literature Review Challenges

Given the intricate challenges of crafting a narrative literature review, it's no wonder that many find
themselves seeking support. For those who are struggling with the complexity of this task, turning to
professional assistance can be a wise and effective strategy. ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ emerges as a
beacon of support in this context, offering specialized services tailored to the needs of academic
researchers and writers.

At ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you'll find a team of expert writers and researchers who are not only
familiar with the intricacies of narrative literature reviews but are also adept at navigating the
challenges mentioned above. Whether you're grappling with synthesizing literature, balancing
breadth and depth, maintaining objectivity, or staying updated with the latest research, their
expertise can provide the guidance and support you need to craft a compelling and rigorous review.

Choosing to collaborate with ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ means entrusting your literature review to

professionals who understand the importance of your work and are committed to helping you
succeed. If you're ready to overcome the challenges of writing a narrative literature review and
achieve excellence in your academic endeavors, consider reaching out to⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ for
support tailored to your specific needs.
Under this approach, you can segregate the topics based on how they have been explained differently
in different literature. Objectives 4 Specify the key question(s) identified for the review topic. I was
as hot as a firecracker, and my head was about to get sunburned. Read them to get a sense of the
types of themes you might want to look for in your own research or to identify ways to organize
your final review. First, narrative reviews simply cannot provide the type of quantitative synthesis of
the literature that meta-analysis provides. By including or excluding particular terms, a more pointed
search return is gleaned. Keep in mind that with unfiltered resources, you take on the role of
reviewing what you find to make sure it is valid and reliable. Case studies are good for describing,
comparing, evaluating and understanding different aspects of a research problem. Independent-
samples T test or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the differences between the two groups.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study in SPC cases diagnosed at the IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico
Rizzoli from 1960 to 2019. Life Sciences Peer Review Literature Review Biomedical Research Meta
Analysis Chiropractic Medicine Review literature See Full PDF Download PDF About Press Blog
People Papers Topics Job Board We're Hiring. More and more people are flocking to the small screen
to find daily entertainment. Given this, while literature reviews are designed to provide an overview
and synthesis of pertinent sources you have explored, there are a number of approaches you could
adopt depending upon the type of analysis underpinning your study. Peer Review reports
Introduction JGCT is a rare and benign renal tumor that originate from the juxtaglomerular cells of
the capillary adventitia in the juxtaglomerular complex. Critically-appraised topics are like short
systematic reviews focused on a particular topic. LW and ML collected and analyzed the data, then
wrote the manuscript; SJ, YO, FW, and KL provided professional opinions about JGCT and
ultrasound manifestations; JL and YJ revised the manuscript; HL and QZ designed and supervised
the study. The literature, or literature, so selected, requires point-by-point evaluation. For example,
you may include survey questionnaire and results in the appendix. You have patients that are sick
with a new disease. We have mentioned the usability, strengths and weaknesses, utilizing the Search,
Appraisal, Synthesis, Analysis (SALSA) framework, and have provided corresponding examples for
each of these types of reviews in different tables. Mahassini N.Juxtaglomerular cell tumor: a distinct
mesenchymal tumor of kidney. Summarize and Synthesize Remember to summarize and synthesize
your sources within each thematic paragraph as well as throughout the review. A fixed-effect model
assumes that the effect of treatment is the same, and that variation between results in different
studies is due to random error. Characterization and management of Juxtaglomerular Cell Tumor:
analysis of 9 cases and literature review. The images or other third party material in this article are
included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the
material. Hereditary multiple exostoses (EXT): mutational studies of familial EXT1 cases and EXT-
associated malignancies. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to estimate the Hazard ratios
(HRs). However, sometimes you may need to add additional sections that are necessary for your
study, but do not fit in the organizational strategy of the body. Third, there are the perceptions,
conclusions, opinion, and interpretations that are shared informally among scholars that become part
of the body of epistemological traditions within the field. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2014;4:33. Jiang S,
Yang Y, Wu R, Yang Q, Zhang C, Tang Y, Mo C.
Development of the Literature Review Four Basic Stages of Writing 1. There’s a reason those ideas
and moments have stuck with you over time. Many essayists work as professors, editors, and
curriculum designers as well. While case studies focus more on concrete details than general theories,
they should usually have some connection with theory in the field. Abstracts allow readers who may
be interested in the report to decide whether it is relevant to their purposes. Unlike quantitative or
experimental research, a strong case study does not require a random or representative sample. Tom
Barnett, Svetlana Godjevac, Caroline Privault, Jean-Michel Renders, John Schneider, Robert
Wickstrom. The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Homework review. What did
you do? What happened as you did that. Trimming yields the adjusted effect size and reduces the
variance of the effects by adding the original studies back into the analysis as a mirror image of each
study. Characterization and management of Juxtaglomerular Cell Tumor: analysis of 9 cases and
literature review. A random-effect model assumes heterogeneity between the studies being
combined, and these models are used when the studies are assumed different, even if a heterogeneity
test does not show a significant result. By including or excluding particular terms, a more pointed
search return is gleaned. Presented by: Karen Peters, DrPH. Objectives. Determine what is a
literature review and why they are useful. When you begin to write your literature review section,
you'll be glad you dug deeper into how the research was designed and constructed because it
establishes a means for developing more substantial analysis and interpretation of the research
problem. If there is a discrepancy between the number of patients included in the study and the
number of patients included in the analysis, this needs to be clearly explained while describing the
patient characteristics, to avoid confusing the reader. Clear margin meant that the tumor had a clear
demarcation with the surrounding tissues. A table should also be included with information related
to the quality of evidence, such as GRADE ( Table 4 ). These are more detailed and elaborate in
comparison to a standard Literature Review concept as the fundamental here is to add a personal and
scientific perspective to the existing study so as to link it better with the topic of research and at the
same time. A case study is a detailed study of a specific subject, such as a person, group, place,
event, organization, or phenomenon. Collect data, integrate the findings and perspectives from
different studies and add your own analysis of its feasibility. An in-depth, detailed examination of
specific cases within a real-world context. J Med Genet. 2001.. Hecht JT, Hogue D, Wang Y, Blanton
SH, Wagner M, Strong LC, Raskind W, Hansen MF, Wells D. While writing the literature review on
your chosen topic in relevance to the chosen literature, you should mention the existing literature’s
facts and knowledge. This process involves performing a regression analysis of the pooled estimate
for covariance at the study level, and so it is usually not considered when the number of studies is
less than 10. From proactively monitoring and fixing your system remotely to enabling you to reset
your own system easily, we have you covered. Molecular screening Molecular screening results,
performed between 2004 and 2020, were available for 50 cases. Choose a method that is appropriate
for the research topic and explain it in detail. Note: You can also find systematic reviews and other
filtered resources in these unfiltered databases. At the other hand, because the diagnosis was
performed in the same Institution, with expertise in the disease, all the cases are evaluated with
homogeneous criteria.
In such a situation, it is better to announce “there was no strong evidence for an effect,” and to
present the P value and confidence intervals. In what ways might geographers view the need for
better distribution of social service agencies in large cities than how social workers might study the
issue. First, narrative reviews simply cannot provide the type of quantitative synthesis of the
literature that meta-analysis provides. In meta-analyses of large-scale studies, the P value is more
greatly affected by the number of studies and patients included, rather than by the significance of
the results; therefore, care should be taken when interpreting the results of a meta-analysis. We have
mentioned the usability, strengths and weaknesses, utilizing the Search, Appraisal, Synthesis,
Analysis (SALSA) framework, and have provided corresponding examples for each of these types of
reviews in different tables. Pain, physical and social functioning, and quality of life in individuals
with multiple hereditary exostoses in the Netherlands: a national cohort study. A p-value? This study
includes 105 MO - for the large majority Caucasian Italian - patients ??74 male and 31 female -
affected by SPC - that were evaluated at the IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli. What is the
difference between literature and review study? 1 Answer. Historical Review Few things rest in
isolation from historical precedent. Extremely hypoechoic might be the characteristics, however, the
data remained insufficient and further study is needed. The grayscale and Color Doppler images of
each patient were acquired and saved by radiologists with more than 5 years of experience in
ultrasound examination. The age at diagnosis of SPC ranges from 13 to 63, with median age at
diagnosis of 34 years. Another difference might be in who is doing the research for the review. This
way the case study is not just an isolated description, but is integrated into existing knowledge about
the topic. As discussed here, the thesis is the most important part of a research paper, but you can’t
arrive at your thesis without a thorough narrative literature review. However, the application of
enhanced ultrasound needs to be based on the two-dimensional ultrasound localization of the lesion.
Create script breakdowns, sides, schedules, storyboards, call sheets and more. To see how to use the
limit and find full text, please see our Joanna Briggs Institute Search Help page. Case of renin-
producing Juxtaglomerular Tumor: effect of ACE inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor antagonist.
Name Period Date (Write this all on the bottom tab). 1. Written in 1 st person point of view in a story
form. 2. Explores how a particular event or time period with a common theme influenced and
affected the author. For each patient, the Disease-Free Survival (DFS) was calculated from the date
of diagnosis to local recurrence, metastasis (MTS) onset or death as a result of the disease. It should
make a significant difference in solving the issue under discussion. To qualify as a systematic review,
a review needs to adhere to standards of transparency and reproducibility. Even when paraphrasing
an author’s work, you still must provide a citation to that work. V. Common Mistakes to Avoid
These are the most common mistakes made in reviewing social science research literature. It aims to
provide a comprehensive understanding of the current state of knowledge on a particular topic.
Characterization and management of Juxtaglomerular Cell Tumor: analysis of 9 cases and literature
review. Wise Traditions London March 17, 2012 Stephanie Seneff MIT. The infrequency of
malignant Disease in diaphyseal aclasis and neurofibromatosis. Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT
showed nine mild enhancement, and two moderate enhancement in parenchymal phase. This can be
especially helpful for students or scholars getting into a new research area, or for directing an entire
community of scholars toward questions that have not yet been answered.