Why Researchers Conduct Literature Review

Conducting a literature review is an essential aspect of any research endeavor. It involves

systematically examining scholarly materials relevant to a particular topic or research question. The
process can be both challenging and time-consuming, requiring researchers to sift through vast
amounts of information to identify relevant studies, analyze their findings, and synthesize them into
a coherent narrative.

One of the primary reasons researchers conduct literature reviews is to familiarize themselves with
existing knowledge and scholarship on a given topic. By reviewing previous studies, researchers can
gain insights into the current state of research, identify gaps in the literature, and formulate research
questions or hypotheses.

Furthermore, literature reviews help researchers contextualize their own work within the broader
scholarly discourse. By examining how other researchers have approached similar questions or topics,
researchers can position their own research within the existing body of knowledge and demonstrate
its significance and novelty.

Additionally, literature reviews allow researchers to critically evaluate the methodology, findings,
and conclusions of previous studies. This critical analysis enables researchers to identify strengths
and weaknesses in the existing literature, which can inform the design and implementation of their
own research studies.

Despite its importance, writing a literature review can be a daunting task for many researchers. It
requires not only a thorough understanding of the subject matter but also strong analytical and
synthesis skills. Moreover, the sheer volume of literature available on most topics can make the
process overwhelming.

For researchers who find themselves struggling with the challenges of writing a literature review, ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers professional assistance. Our team of experienced writers specializes in
conducting comprehensive literature reviews tailored to your specific research needs. With our help,
you can ensure that your literature review is thorough, well-organized, and effectively communicates
the significance of your research.

Don't let the difficulties of writing a literature review hold you back. Order now on ⇒ StudyHub.vip
⇔ and take the first step towards producing a high-quality research paper that makes a meaningful
contribution to your field.
You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. This is expected and is an essential component
of a good research study. Thematic description (in prose) organized around and related directly to
the issue rationale and relevance in an evaluation framework a survey of a specific question or policy
issue. A Dissertation Literature Review can be a basic summarization of important source materials
or it can also be a critical assessment of the research materials for conveying a personal opinion on
the same. Burke’s Parlor. How to join a conversation that’s been going on since the dawn of time. He
identifies the overall total damage done as more important than the frequency of injuries (Skepper,
2011). The approach selected depends on the objectives of the study, the research design, and the
availability of time, money, and personnel. The answer to any question raised in a non-research
setting is almost always obvious. As a result, it establishes the author’s experience in the topic and
offers legitimacy to carry forward the wisdom of the field through scientific and methodical
techniques. The dissemination may be made through a conference, a seminar, a report, or an oral or
poster presentation. Tailoring the report to the audience ensures that the findings are communicated
effectively and are relevant to their needs. Meta-analysis should never be used instead of vote
counting, and formal narrative synthesis methods should be used to summarize and describe the
evidence base. Understanding the research process is necessary to effectively carry out research and
sequence the stages inherent in the process. Tolerance Hydra10P Avene trainings blink Tolerance
Hydra10P Avene trainings blink How to Conduct a Literature Review 1. There are a variety of
approaches to research in any field of investigation, irrespective of whether it is applied research or
basic research. To conduct research that adds value to the field, precise awareness of the level of
wisdom on a subject is required. Meta-analysis should never be used instead of vote counting, and
formal narrative synthesis methods should be used to summarize and describe the evidence base.
Theories are only scientific if the hypotheses that make them up can be empirically tested. Here is the
list of common mistakes which the writers should avoid while writing literature review in research
paper. Sutton Fundamental Research Concepts Chapter 2 Summary. We should write our review
keeping in mind the audience and that the sources are chronological in order and are as current as
possible, author controversies are referred to, it is concise and focused on the thesis statement, sample
literature reviews are used as citations and proper paragraphing is maintained. In contrast, the non-
research problems do not need to go through these processes. The research process usually begins
with a research question. Must be organized and flow coherently under various subheadings. These
generalizations take the form of hypotheses and theories. Understand the nature and role of
secondary data Describe how to conduct a literature review Identify sources of internal and external
secondary data Discuss conceptualization and its role in model development. Delirium and
dehydration: inevitable companions of terminal disease. Literature Review (Review of Related
Literature - Research Methodology) 1. Prof. Dilip Barad. These journals have their format and
editorial policies. It is an exploratory research endeavor in which individuals knowledgeable and
experienced in a particular research problem are intimately consulted to understand the problem.
But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience. This is
expected and is an essential component of a good research study. The research process usually begins
with a research question. Stakeholders can be identified, mapped, and contacted without the need for
large budgets for feedback and inclusion. Espanol Portugues Francais Research Process: 8 Steps in
Research Process The research process starts with identifying a research problem and conducting a
literature review to understand the context. Quantitative data is analyzed using descriptive and
inferential statistical methods. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are
stored on your browser as they are as essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website.
A summary or an outline is a succinct account of all informational highlights from essential sources,
whereas synthesis is the restructuring or rearrangement of the material to guide the dissertation’s
plan of exploring the research subject. February 15, 2024 Advanced Statistical Methods in Meta-
analysis: Enhancing Accuracy, Reliability, and Insights February 12, 2024 Inventions in Medical
Therapeutics: There’s a World of Possibilities February 1, 2024. It is a master plan specifying the
methods and procedures for collecting, processing, and analyzing the collected data. This implies
that the reason(s) for this discrepancy is unclear to the researcher (so that it makes sense to develop a
research question); and There should be at least two possible answers or solutions to the questions or
problems. The third point is important. Induction takes specific data and makes generalizations from
them. A Study on the Relationship between Affective Learning outcome and Achievemen.
Knowledge Can Combine Science and Belief Tradition The Media Personal experience Authorities
VS. Science must avoid logical mistakes that make incorrect connections and result in faulty
information outcomes. More on Methods Referencing Static Methods (and Variables) Overloading
More on Classes Wrapper Classes Constructors Groups of Classes - Packages More on Software
Design. When getting started on your literature review, it helps to know what role this plays in your
overall project. Introduction Endocrinology class -2.pptx Introduction Endocrinology class -2.pptx
ANTI-HYPERTENSIVE DRUG - RAUWOLFIA ROOT. After this a Citation Chase should be
conducted with related books and topics. Delirium and dehydration: inevitable companions of
terminal disease. Such review shall be shall be deemed to have been designed to fill the identified
gaps. Determine The Purposes For The Literature Review Recognize The Need For Becoming
Familiar With The Library's Services Distinguish Between Primary And Secondary Sources In
Research Literature Recognize The Importance Of Grey Literature. These include, among others, the
following: Statement of the problem. Here again, there is one single reason that Vibrio cholera is not
sensitive to penicillin; therefore, this is not the drug of choice for this disease. There are various
research reports: term papers, dissertations, journal articles, papers for presentation at professional
conferences and seminars, books, thesis, and so on. Powerpoint Study Guide Etic Logic Ad hominem
False dilemma Reductionism Ethnocentrism Questionable Cause Hypothesis Theory Induction
Deduction Reliability Validity Quantitative Qualitative Science Belief Tradition Authority The
Media Personal Experience Evidence Logic Hypotheses Theories Induction Deduction Validity
Reliability Emic. How to Conduct a Literature Review Jun 16, 2011 ROBIN FEATHERSTONE 2. 3.
4. 5. Selecting research questions 6. Secondly the body section, which talks about the problem in
hand, and about the different perspectives and theories presented by other researchers. Contact
Creative Savants team on their email and contact number for more details. If there is only one
possible and plausible answer to the question about the discrepancy, then a research situation does
not exist.
How to Identify the Research Gap While Writing a PhD Dissertation Literature. Emicdata is used to
describe the perspective of a specific society, group or individual. Several organizations, both
broadly and specifically, have published guidelines for conducting an intensive literature search in
preparation for formal systematic reviews (e.g., PRISMA). The literature is largely evaluated to
discover knowledge gaps in the topic, and these gaps are further probed throughout the study to
develop new facts or hypotheses that offer value to the area. Tailoring the report to the audience
ensures that the findings are communicated effectively and are relevant to their needs. It allows the
researcher to understand what concepts and theories are relevant to his area of investigation. Thirdly,
the literature review conclusion section, which summarizes the above points and also sets the focus
of the research again by showing writer’s agreement or disagreement with other researchers. The
bidders pay exorbitantly higher transport costs, which constitute about 30% of their total cost. It is
assembled as an interactive Web-based mind map, titled “Research Tools”, which is updated
periodically. “Research Tools” consists of a hierarchical set of nodes. Founded iEduNote.com and
writes on various business subjects. Choosing the best alternative in terms of time constraints,
money, and human resources in our research decision is our primary goal. Although researchers are
often not in a position to implement a plan for utilizing research findings, they can contribute by
including in their research reports a few recommendations regarding how the study results could be
utilized for policy formulation and program intervention. In justifying the problems, we ask such
questions as why the problem of the study is important, how large and widespread the problem is,
and whether others can be convinced about the importance of the problem and the like. Stakeholders
can be identified, mapped, and contacted without the need for large budgets for feedback and
inclusion. Qualitative data is summarized in written descriptions of the contents of interviews,
content analyses, observations or participant observation. Other studies claim that burns from melted
cheese are more hazardous (Rechaud, 1989; Rarebit, 2009), whilst a minority of recent studies have
identified slipping on cheese as a growing danger (Skepper, 2011). It takes time, training and effort..
Introduction. The end goal of a scientific study is to interpret the results and draw conclusions. A
research problem is a perceived difficulty, a feeling of discomfort, or a discrepancy between a
common belief and reality. For Later 0% 0% found this document useful, Mark this document as
useful 0% 0% found this document not useful, Mark this document as not useful Embed Share Print
Download now Jump to Page You are on page 1 of 68 Search inside document. Whereas, if you are
fining the cheapest and effective source to get academic writing, business writing, or other
professional writing services then Creative Savants is the best online writing agency for you. The
personal computer offers an excellent opportunity for data editing and coding processes. Only then
the reader will know that the basics of research have not been neglected. Thus, although the problem
situation exists, the reason for the problem is already known. One cannot write a report (step 8)
unless he has collected and analyzed data (step 7). Provides editors with a list of potential reviewers.
It adds value to the legitimacy of the research in many ways. We may enumerate several reasons for
this: Villages differ in their socio-economic background. It also provides evidence you can refer back
to later to help interpret your own results. A population is the total collection of elements we wish to
make some inference or generalization.
Development Society of Australasia Inc., HERDSA, University of New South Wales, Sydney,
Australia. pp. 435-439. Only then the reader will know that the basics of research have not been
neglected. A research study design is formed to select a sample size and collect data after processing
and analyzing the collected data and the research findings presented in a research report. It contrasts
with the process of complete enumeration, in which every member of the population is included. Be
explicit, and use high-quality guidance and standards for review conduct and reporting (e.g., CEE
Guidance) (PRISMA or ROSES) Reviewers may wind up with the wrong evidence for the subject at
hand due to selection bias (containing studies that are not typical of the evidence base) and a lack of
comprehensiveness (an inadequate search approach). In this post, we discussed common issues with
Literature search services methods, provided examples for each, and offered practical solutions for
mitigating them. Blenders have significantly fewer marketing functions involving transportation, so
their marketing cost remains minimal. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press. (call number. Joe
Pozdol, MLIS Evans Whitaker, MD, MLIS Norris Medical Library University of Southern
California 2003 Zonal Ave. The reason for the discrepancy is known; hence, we do not consider the
problem a research problem. A confident and expert researcher is more crucial in questioning the
others’ methodology, the choice of the data, and the quality of the inferences drawn from the study
results. There are four basic research designs that a researcher can use to conduct their study; survey,
experiment, secondary data study, and observational study. A summary or an outline is a succinct
account of all informational highlights from essential sources, whereas synthesis is the restructuring
or rearrangement of the material to guide the dissertation’s plan of exploring the research subject.
This will help the reader in organizing the data according to the literature review structure. So, there
must be a careful effort in searching and selecting the required literature which must be relevant and
specific. Theory Definition: a set of related hypotheses that act together to provide a better
explanation than any single hypothesis. How to Conduct a Literature Review Jun 16, 2011 ROBIN
FEATHERSTONE 2. 3. 4. 5. Selecting research questions 6. If refuted, an hypothesis must be
discarded or changed and retested. Demonstrates your familiarity with existing knowledge in the
field Directs readers to other literature of interest. Delirium and dehydration: inevitable companions
of terminal disease. Literature Review. A literature review is a comprehensive examination of
available information that is related to your research topic. Therefore, assuming all the facts are
correct, there is no reason to research the factors associated with pill discontinuation among women.
The review of the literature is defined as a broad, comprehensive, in-depth, systematic, and critical
review of scholarly publications, unpublished scholarly print materials, audiovisual materials, and
personal communications. There are a variety of approaches to research in any field of investigation,
irrespective of whether it is applied research or basic research. Ignoring the existing literature may
lead to wasted effort on the part of the researchers. Now that you are familiar with research process;
explore complete guideline on research and research methodology concepts. Understanding the
research process is necessary to effectively carry out research and sequence the stages inherent in the
process. We have countless problems around us, but all we encounter do not qualify as research
problems; thus, these do not need to be researched. Here the purpose of literature review is to
provide the reader in advance, that how this particular research will change or will provide an
evidence to the already existing theory or finding. Once we have chosen a research problem, a few
more related steps must be followed before a decision is taken to undertake a research study.
Use existing organizations to your advantage (e.g., the Collaboration for Environmental Evidence).
The bidders pay exorbitantly higher transport costs, which constitute about 30% of their total cost.
Provides editors with a list of potential reviewers. Here again, there is one single reason that Vibrio
cholera is not sensitive to penicillin; therefore, this is not the drug of choice for this disease. Critical
literature review demands staying focused on the same theme, in which the information can differ
but theme cannot be changed. As noted by Fisher et al. (1993), a problem will qualify as a potential
research problem when the following three conditions exist: There should be a perceived discrepancy
between “what it is” and “what it should have been.” This implies that there should be a difference
between “what exists” and the “ideal or planned situation”; A question about “why” the discrepancy
exists. If time is available, search references in Scopus for: 1: Stiefel F. This sample will make a way
to writing and organizing the literature review in well organized and patterned way; writing from
general to specific topic. Secondly the body section, which talks about the problem in hand, and
about the different perspectives and theories presented by other researchers. Epidemiological Study
Design, Research Design, Clinical Research Epidemiological Study Design, Research Design,
Clinical Research Pott's Spine. (Tuberculosis Spine) pptx Pott's Spine. (Tuberculosis Spine) pptx
USG,CT AND MR IMAGING OF HEPATIC MASS LESIONS. While demonstrating the
continuity of knowledge, the literature review also identifies areas that demand more inquiry and
serves as a starting point for future research. The writer of literature research should either take notes
on the paper or should write them in the paragraphs form in the word file. A Study on the
Relationship between Affective Learning outcome and Achievemen. Once we have chosen a
research problem, a few more related steps must be followed before a decision is taken to undertake
a research study. A close examination of the above stages reveals that each of these stages, by and
large, is dependent upon the others. Shubin Liu, Ph.D. Research Computing Center University of
North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Must be organized and flow coherently under various subheadings.
Keeping this point in mind, we must draw a line between research and non-research problems.
Intuitively, researchable problems are those that have a possibility of thorough verification
investigation, which can be effected through the analysis and collection of data. Here is the list of
common mistakes which the writers should avoid while writing literature review in research paper. It
contrasts with the process of complete enumeration, in which every member of the population is
included. Inappropriate synthesis (for example, using vote-counting and incorrect statistics) can undo
the initial systematic effort. The researcher sets research questions, objectives, and hypotheses based
on the research problem. Mr. Chris Spencer Scotland High school Science Educator UNCP Graduate
Student. Create and publish a detailed a priori protocol outlining planned searching, screening, data
extraction, critical appraisal, and synthesis methods. It enables the researcher to systematically point
out why the proposed research on the problem should be undertaken and what he hopes to achieve
with the study’s findings. The next step is identifying the factors that may have contributed to the
perceived problems. Issues of Research Problem Identification There are several ways to identify,
define, and analyze a problem, obtain insights, and get a clearer idea about these issues. The
literature is largely evaluated to discover knowledge gaps in the topic, and these gaps are further
probed throughout the study to develop new facts or hypotheses that offer value to the area. The
basic idea of sampling is that it involves any procedure that uses a relatively small number of items
or portions (called a sample) of a universe (called population) to conclude the whole population.
Only then the reader will know that the basics of research have not been neglected. Why is the
research design important in the research process.