Struggling with writing a literature review? You're not alone.

Crafting a comprehensive literature

review can be a daunting task, requiring meticulous research, critical analysis, and effective synthesis
of existing scholarly works. Whether you're a student, researcher, or professional, the challenges of
navigating through vast amounts of literature while ensuring coherence and relevance can often feel
overwhelming.

From defining the scope of your review to identifying key themes and debates, each step demands
careful attention and expertise. Moreover, synthesizing diverse sources and presenting a coherent
narrative requires not only a deep understanding of the subject matter but also strong writing skills.

If you find yourself grappling with the complexities of literature review writing, fear not. Help is at
hand. At ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, we specialize in providing expert assistance to individuals seeking to
master the art of literature review writing. Our team of experienced writers and researchers is
dedicated to helping you navigate through the intricacies of academic writing, ensuring that your
literature review meets the highest standards of quality and rigor.

By entrusting your literature review to us, you can expect:

1. Thorough Research: We delve deep into the literature to identify relevant sources and extract
key insights, ensuring that your review is comprehensive and well-informed.
2. Critical Analysis: Our experts critically evaluate each source, identifying strengths,
weaknesses, and gaps in the existing literature to provide a nuanced perspective on your
topic.
3. Coherent Synthesis: We synthesize diverse perspectives and findings to construct a cohesive
narrative that effectively communicates the state of knowledge in your field.
4. Customized Approach: Every literature review we produce is tailored to your specific
requirements, ensuring that it aligns with your research objectives and academic expectations.
5. Timely Delivery: We understand the importance of deadlines, and our efficient workflow
ensures that your literature review is delivered on time, allowing you ample opportunity for
review and revisions.

Don't let the challenges of literature review writing hold you back. Trust ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ to
deliver a literature review that showcases your expertise and contributes to the advancement of
knowledge in your field. Contact us today to learn more about our services and take the first step
towards academic success.
You start with some articles about the physiology of sperm whales in biology journals written in the
1980’s. Take notes and cite your sources As you read, you should also begin the writing process.
Works consulted We consulted these works while writing this handout. Then your review would
have subsections according to eras within this period. However, if you choose this strategy, be
careful to avoid simply listing and summarizing sources in order. There may be other places where
people are publishing exemplary research. All screening will be conducted using the online screening
tool Rayyan. It’s achievable with writers who have gained a PhD themselves. Try sorting through
some other current bibliographies or literature reviews in the field to get a sense of what your
discipline expects. It contains the most pertinent studies and points to important past and current
research and practices. Objectivity -- is the author's perspective even-handed or prejudicial. Is the
opinion of the author well supported in the field. Your order will be completed by a writing expert
who is ready to evidence originality with reliable plagiarism-checking results. The narrative review's
purpose is to identify commonalities, gaps, and contradictions in the literature. You will have to
demonstrate valid and interesting findings in the field after the conducted analysis. You can simply
put the word “review” in your search engine along with your other topic terms to find articles of this
type on the Internet or in an electronic database. In search of information on Find out how to Write a
Literature Review. The basic research question — what works? — which is usually associated with
systematic reviews changes to: what is it about this intervention that works, for whom, in what
circumstances, in what respects and why. When doing and writing a literature review, it is good
practice to: summarise and analyse previous research and theories; identify areas of controversy and
contested claims; highlight any gaps that may exist in research to date. The images or other third
party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated
otherwise in a credit line to the material. Journal of experimental criminology, 10, 487-513. Reith, T.
P. (2018). Burnout in United States healthcare professionals: a narrative review. A flow diagram
shows the number of studies identified, screened, and included or excluded at each stage of study
selection. A special focus will be placed on studies exploring prevalence, access to care and treatment
experiences. Its areas of measurement however, have a strong production orientation that would.
Write in well-structured paragraphs: use transitions and topic sentences to draw connections,
comparisons and contrasts. Overall, the outcomes of the quality assessment of included RCT studies
are reported in Fig. 4. By applying the RoB 2, all the 11 RCTs studies revealed high, low, and unclear
risk of bias in some key domains. For students, it is a way to gauge their knowledge of books or
stories they read. To learn more about literature reviews, take a look at our workshop on Writing
Literature Reviews of Published Research. For guidance on formatting citations, please see the UNC
Libraries citation tutorial. The efficacy of acupuncture and decompression splints in the treatment of
temporomandibular joint pain-dysfunction syndrome.
Chapter Google Scholar Simma I, Gleditsch JM, Simma L, Piehslinger E. Thank you for visiting
nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. Analysis of Performance
Appraisal Systems on Employee Job Productivity in Pub. However, if you are writing a review in the
humanities, history, or social sciences, a survey of the history of the literature may be what is needed,
because what is important is how perspectives have changed through the years or within a certain
time period. Furthermore, data suggests that laser acupuncture is a highly successful treatment for
TMJ problems. For those for whom conservative therapy was selected, laser acupuncture is a safe,
noninvasive, and efficient therapeutic choice since it lessens the chronic pain linked to TMD and has
no negative side effects. The authors find that women who divorce had increased their labor supply
during the three years prior, raising questions as to the cause- effect relationship between women's
labor supply and marital dissolution. Some useful databases to search for journals and articles
include: Your university’s library catalogue Google Scholar Project Muse (humanities and social
sciences) Medline (life sciences and biomedicine) EconLit (economics) Inspec (physics, engineering
and computer science) You can also use boolean operators to help narrow down your search.
Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. They are guaranteed to have in-depth
knowledge and practical and research expertise in the field. Rich studies are often found in specialist
qualitative research or social science journals. Many of the victims of Operation Condor were
kidnapped in one country and then taken to another country, where they were tortured and killed.
You will often see the terms “the research,” “the scholarship,” and “the literature” used mostly
interchangeably. The only difference here between a “chronological” and a “thematic” approach is
what is emphasized the most: the development of the harpoon or the harpoon technology.But more
authentic thematic reviews tend to break away from chronological order. Literature reviews don’t
have to be as scary as they seem. Writing the body In the body, you should: Group research studies
and other types of literature (reviews, theoretical articles, case studies, etc.) according to common
denominators such as qualitative versus quantitative approaches, conclusions of authors, specific
purpose or objective, chronology, etc. Cite them right Published study guides There are a number of
scholarship skills books and guides available which can help with writing a literature review. The
introduction should clearly establish the focus and purpose of the literature review. Whereas a
abstract of the what you have got learn is contained throughout the literature overview, it goes nicely
past merely summarizing skilled literature. Create an order for your paragraph summaries (try this
with just 3-4 paragraphs that relate). Good academic practice As with any writing task, you will need
to review, edit and rewrite sections of your literature review. If you are writing the literature review
section of a dissertation or research paper, you will search for literature related to your research
objectives and questions. A detailed systematic search of relevant databases (Medline, EMBASE,
PsycINFO, CINAHL and Web of Science) will be conducted. You have now created a draft of a
Short Literature Review. Note that more authentic thematic reviews tend to break away from
chronological order. All your further steps will be determined by this easy one that gives a general
perspective. Referencing and reference management Information Services provide access to Cite
them right online which is a guide to the main referencing systems and tells you how to reference
just about any source (EASE log-in may be required). For example, a sociologist might centre their
research around critiquing specific fieldwork practices. The following collection of annotated sample
literature reviews written and co-written by colleagues associated with UW-Madison showcases how
these reviews can do different kind of work for different purposes. The literature review might give
a new interpretation of old material or combine new with old interpretations. To this end, they
provide a number of recommendations to strengthen knowledge development towards improving the
design and execution of future reviews on home telemonitoring. 9.4. Summary Table 9.1 outlines the
main types of literature reviews that were described in the previous sub-sections and summarizes the
main characteristics that distinguish one review type from another.
Hire a verified Ph.D. and get a thorough overview of topic-relevant sources. This helps you
remember what you read and saves time later in the process. You have to state the date, month then
the year or vice-versa and give credit where it is due by giving a name. For example: Look at what
results have emerged in qualitative versus quantitative research Discuss how the topic has been
approached by empirical versus theoretical scholarship Divide the literature into sociological,
historical, and cultural sources Theoretical A literature review is often the foundation for a
theoretical framework. History: The chronological progression of the field, the research literature, or
an idea that is necessary to understand the literature review, if the body of the literature review is not
already a chronology. There may be future developments that could make your work less relevant.
Various scales were employed, ranging from the methods for diagnosing TMD to the method for
evaluating the effectiveness of acupuncture and laser acupuncture. Keep your own voice While the
literature review presents others’ ideas, your voice (the writer’s) should remain front and center. This
website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and
Edge. If you are writing the literature review as part of your dissertation or thesis, reiterate your
central problem or research question and give a brief summary of the scholarly context. The aim of
this article was to assess the clinical evidence for acupuncture and laser acupuncture therapies as
treatment for temporomandibular joint disorder (TMD). There is no need to create an account or
provide your credit card information. Read them to get a sense of the types of themes you might
want to look for in your own research or to identify ways to organize your final review. In the early
2000s, several former military officials from the participating countries were charged with crimes
related to Operation Condor. Their next merit is the writing techniques they practice. Download
references This research received no external funding. EDs have high comorbidity with other
psychiatric conditions and are associated with suicidal thoughts and attempts. 4 5 The medical
complications that often accompany EDs involve almost all organ systems and can be life-
threatening, 6 leading to significantly increased mortality rates. 7 Given the negative consequences
of EDs, it is imperative that we understand their prevalence and treatment within and across ethnic
groups. Head Neck Oncol. 2011;3(1):1. Inchingolo F, Tatullo M, Marrelli M, Inchingolo AM,
Picciariello V, Inchingolo AD, et al. Pick one of these themes to focus the organization of your
review. How The Diverse Labor Force Management Improves Individual. He holds a PhD in
education and has published over 20 articles in scholarly journals. Researchers conducted a
systematic search of meta-analyses and reviewed several databases, collecting 100 primary studies
and five meta-analyses to analyze the connection between cholesterol and Alzheimer’s disease. We
researched the most effective protective measures and put them into practice, which made our
platform riskless. Reporting and record management Little is written on optimal use of technology. 8
A rapid review is not a good time to learn review management software or qualitative analysis
management software. Unlike other review types, critical reviews attempt to take a reflective account
of the research that has been done in a particular area of interest, and assess its credibility by using
appraisal instruments or critical interpretive methods. In organisations where individual consumer
acquisition and retention are central to. Literature search -- finding materials relevant to the subject
being explored. 3. Data evaluation -- determining which literature makes a significant contribution to
the understanding of the topic. 4. Analysis and interpretation -- discussing the findings and
conclusions of pertinent literature. For example, a review of the Internet’s impact on American
presidential politics could focus on the development of online political satire. We deal with standard
(MLA, APA) and custom styles. Among the painful TMD of muscular origin, the most frequent is
myofascial pain (MP).
Below is a five-step process for conducting a simple review of the literature for your project. The
aim of this article was to assess the clinical evidence for acupuncture and laser acupuncture therapies
as treatment for temporomandibular joint disorder. Other Sections of Your Literature Review Once
you've decided on the organizational method for your literature review, the sections you need to
include in the paper should be easy to figure out because they arise from your organizational
strategy. Ethics declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate. In terms of the technical
aspects of the acupuncture treatment used in the RCT, the duration of each session varied between
15 48 and 51, 20 53,54 and 30 min. A scoping review was chosen as the most appropriate
methodology. As mentioned earlier, when rigorously conducted review articles represent powerful
information sources for eHealth scholars and practitioners looking for state-of-the-art evidence.
Select the plagiarism report if you feel you need it to prove the service quality. I am happy with the
writing, especially the sources used. But it can be feasibly done through following a structured
approach to data collection and analysis. Articles Get discovered by sharing your best content as
bite-sized articles. Use caution when paraphrasing When paraphrasing a source that is not your own,
be sure to represent the author’s information or opinions accurately and in your own words. Meta-
analysis This is a type of systematic review that uses statistical methods to combine and summarize
the results of several studies. Introduction This paper forms part of a series from the Cochrane
Rapid Reviews Methods Group providing methodological guidance for rapid reviews. Usually a
literature review forms a section or part of a dissertation, research project or long essay. Quality
control must be fit for purpose but not excessive. I was struggling to come up with a sensible
literature review but this has been really helpful. When we say “literature review” or refer to “the
literature,” we are talking about the research ( scholarship ) in a given field. The applications of
various performance measurement systems to voluntary ACE. Examples in the page provide further
information regarding how an essay is made and formed. In summary, the review team should
consider privileging rich qualitative studies 2; consider a stepwise approach to inclusion of
qualitative data and explore the possibility of sampling ( table 2, item R5). While we try to offer
these once per academic year, we find providing the recording to be helpful to community members
who have missed the session. Critically evaluate: mention the strengths and weaknesses of your
sources. Then, just as you would for most other academic forms of writing, rewrite or rework the
language of your review so that you’ve presented your information in the most concise manner
possible. Unlike a dissertation research question, this question has to be answerable without
collecting original data. The narrative review's purpose is to identify commonalities, gaps, and
contradictions in the literature. Ask your professor questions such as: “If you had to read only one
book from the 90’s on topic X, what would it be?” Questions such as this help you to find and
determine quickly the most seminal pieces in the field. However, if you are writing a review in the
humanities, history, or social sciences, a survey of the history of the literature may be what is needed,
because what is important is how perspectives have changed through the years or within a certain
time period. You’re guaranteed smooth cooperation with a writing service expert who matches the
requirements for your literature review. Inclusion and exclusion criteria must be established to help
researchers eliminate studies that are not aligned with the research questions.
Dental occlusion, body posture and temporomandibular disorders: where we are now and where we
are heading for. Consult with a librarian about identifying research databases in other disciplines;
almost every field of study has at least one comprehensive database devoted to indexing its research
literature. In the first round of screening, two reviewers (RM and HT) will review paper titles and
abstracts. Master of Business Studies thesis, Dublin City University. Then you look up a book
written in 1968 with information on how sperm whales have been portrayed in other forms of art,
such as in Alaskan poetry, in French painting, or on whale bone, as the whale hunters in the late 19th
century used to do. Instead, researchers often present studies that are representative of most works
published in a particular area and they consider a specific time frame to be mapped. A literature or
narrative review is a comprehensive review and analysis of the published literature on a specific
topic or research question. Right? Wrong! The “literature” of a literature review refers to any
collection of materials on a topic, not necessarily the great literary texts of the world. “Literature”
could be anything from a set of government pamphlets on British colonial methods in Africa to
scholarly articles on the treatment of a torn ACL. Decisions on relevance are
challenging—precautions for swine influenza may inform precautions for bird influenza. 28 A
smoking ban may operate similarly to seat belt legislation, etc. For instance, Levy and Ellis (2006)
proposed a generic framework for conducting such reviews. In these cases, the lit review just needs
to cover scholarship that is important to the issue you are writing about; sometimes it will also cover
key sources that informed your research methodology. Victoria (BC): University of Victoria; 2017
Feb 27. A systematic review of association studies: end of an era. There are a few ways to find the
forms or templates you need. It should be one to three paragraphs long, depending on what you are
writing about. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Systematic Reviews as Topic
Patient Care Data availability statement No data are available. I was struggling to come up with a
sensible literature review but this has been really helpful. Much of the information used in an
annotated bibliography can be used also in a literature review, so you’ll be not only partially drafting
your lit review as you research, but also developing your sense of the larger conversation going on
among scholars, professionals, and any other stakeholders in your topic. Guidance for authoring a
rapid QES is scattered and requires compilation and summary. After an overview of similar strategic
measuring tools in industry (Fitzgerald et al. Where data is less plentiful then surveys or other
qualitative data sources may need to be included. Laser acupuncture in patients with
temporomandibular dysfunction: a randomized controlled trial. Look at sources the authors cite to in
their work. Work is underway to identify an assessment process that is compatible with QESs that
support decision-making. 41 For now the choice of a checklist remains determined by interim
Cochrane guidance and, beyond this, by personal preference and experience. These articles include
content such as a brief synopsis or the key points of the film or programme plus the critic’s own
evaluation. What types of sources (books, journal articles, websites). To obtain the best experience,
we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet
Explorer). Findings from eight rct s involving 6,615 participants were pooled into meta-analyses to
calculate the magnitude of effects that mobile text message reminders have on the rate of attendance
at healthcare appointments compared to no reminders and phone call reminders. An ACE
organisation with a mission to provide English support to migrants might.
Nevertheless, it shouldn’t simply be a The next 5 literature overview try to demon- The pattern
consisted initially of 1001 random psychology college students at a university, literature being. You
don’t want to substitute a thorough review of core research literature in your discipline for studies
conducted in other fields of study. Does the research use established frameworks or take an
innovative approach. Lamb, Sandra E. 1998. How to Write It: A Complete Guide to Everything
You’ll Ever Write. In these cases, systematic reviews can use qualitative synthesis methods such as
vote counting, content analysis, classification schemes and tabulations, as an alternative approach to
narratively synthesize the results of the independent studies included in the review. Persuasiveness -
- which of the author's theses are most convincing or least convincing. Try to analyse patterns,
turning points and key debates that have shaped the direction of the field. For example, weave
references to other sources into what you are writing but maintain your own voice by starting and
ending the paragraph with your own ideas and wording. In the absence of validated risk of bias tools
for qualitative studies, the team should choose a tool according to Cochrane Qualitative and
Implementation Methods Group (CQIMG) guidance together with expediency (according to ease of
use, prior familiarity, etc) ( table 2, item R15). 41 In comparison to the Critical Appraisal Skills
Programme checklist which was never designed for use in synthesis, 42 the Cochrane qualitative tool
is similarly easy to use and was designed for QES use. The scope of your review will depend on your
topic and discipline: in the sciences you usually only review recent literature, but in the humanities
you might take a long historical perspective (for example, to trace how a concept has changed in
meaning over time). Overall, the outcomes of the quality assessment of included RCT studies are
reported in Fig. 4. By applying the RoB 2, all the 11 RCTs studies revealed high, low, and unclear
risk of bias in some key domains. See online supplemental appendix 1 for the search strategy for each
of the databases. When considering the studies to include in this analysis, 2 groups were identified
and selected based on the criteria required for the systematic review. Guidance for authoring a rapid
QES is scattered and requires compilation and summary. I am by now convinced that the best article
means the article with good flow and a comprehensive pack of ideas. A review may be a self-
contained unit — an end in itself — or a preface to and rationale for engaging in primary research.
Instead, your review should be not in the form of a list, but an investigation that represents the
opinions and ideas in the field, analyze the literature bodies, give multiple perspectives of different
writers, and indicate the challenges and changes in prevailing opinions. Doing Your Literature
Review: Traditional and Systematic Techniques. Based on your reading and notes, you can look for:
Trends and patterns (in theory, method or results): do certain approaches become more or less
popular over time. In the early 2000s, several former military officials from the participating
countries were charged with crimes related to Operation Condor. If the same authors, books or
articles keep appearing in your reading, make sure to seek them out. In contrast, less rich studies may
itemise themes with an occasional indicative text extract and tend to summarise findings.
Recapitulate important features of a research study, but then synthesize it by rephrasing the study's
significance and relating it to your own work and the work of others. The only proofreading tool
specialized in correcting academic writing - try for free. This handout will explain what literature
reviews are and offer insights into the form and construction of literature reviews in the humanities,
social sciences, and sciences. Rauch A, Nitschke I, Hahnel S, Weber S, Zenthofer A, Schierz O.
Analyzing data using quantitative or qualitative methods. Literature review A literature review also
includes a critical evaluation of the material; this is why it is called a literature review rather than a
literature report. Our recommendations derive from current QES guidance, 5 evidence on modified
QES methods, 8 13 and practical experience. 14 15 This paper presents an overview of
considerations and recommendations as described in table 2. A flow diagram shows the number of
studies identified, screened, and included or excluded at each stage of study selection.
Conclude by providing some insight into the relationship between the central topic of the literature
review and a larger area of study such as a discipline, a scientific endeavor, or a profession. Evaluate
the current “state of the art” for the body of knowledge reviewed, pointing out major
methodological flaws or gaps in research, inconsistencies in theory and findings, and areas or issues
pertinent to future study. For students, it is a way to gauge their knowledge of books or stories they
read. Buy Literature Review From Experts Who Know How To Write APA Literature Review
During your college and university learning you will be required to write research papers,
dissertation, thesis or capstone project paper. They are guaranteed to have in-depth knowledge and
practical and research expertise in the field. The purpose is to develop a body of literature that
establishes a contrarian viewpoint. How much of the review should be theoretical?” and so on. The
overall ranking showed no studies with low risk of bias. If you are writing the literature review
section of a dissertation or research paper, you will search for literature related to your research
objectives and questions. Only then you can proceed to a part of a general overview to show the
current perspectives and arguments. Make it a point to read major theories and landmark studies in
the field of your research. It's clear from the research reviewed that evaluative commentary is widely
practiced all Estimated Reading Time: 9 mins Tartuffe Literature Review Examples Tartuffe is
perhaps one of the most revealing of plays by Moliere as it deals with women’s follies and
disenchantment with men. In other words, a complete understanding the research problem requires
you to deliberately examine how knowledge and perspectives have changed over time. It looks like
you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. However, despite similar and in some cases increased
prevalence of disordered eating and EDs among minority ethnic groups, there appear to be
disparities when it comes to ED diagnosis and treatment. They find that the literature compellingly
demonstrates that low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels significantly influence the
development of Alzheimer’s disease. When you have multiple sources cited in a paragraph, you are
more likely to be synthesizing them (not always, but often Read more about synthesis here. He then
relates his theories on learning organisations back. A good starting point could be to look at some
examples, depending on what kind of literature review you’d like to write. It is often written as part
of a thesis, dissertation, or research paper, in order to situate your work in relation to existing
knowledge. However, only include what is necessary for the reader to locate your study within the
larger scholarship about the research problem. The narrative review’s purpose is to identify
commonalities, gaps, and contradictions in the literature. For each publication, ask yourself: What
question or problem is the author addressing. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and
abstracts and full-texts against specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. It is a process of reviewing
the literature, as well as a form of writing. Literature reviews can take two major forms. The most
prevalent one is the “literature review” or “background” section within a journal paper or a chapter
in a graduate thesis. VAS scale on subjective pain in patients was evaluated in same region in all
studies, where were the main area surrounding the TMJ, generally face, jaw and masseter muscle.
Questions for Further Research: What questions about the field has the review sparked. How does
the publication contribute to your understanding of the topic. Analysis of Performance Appraisal
Systems on Employee Job Productivity in Pub.