Title: Master the Art of Literature Review for Your Case Study with⇒ StudyHub.

vip ⇔

Are you struggling with crafting a comprehensive literature review for your case study? Look no
further! At ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, we understand the challenges students face when it comes to
conducting thorough research and synthesizing existing literature effectively. Let us alleviate your
stress and help you ace your literature review with ease.

Writing a literature review is no easy feat. It requires meticulous research, critical analysis, and the
ability to synthesize information from various sources coherently. For a case study, in particular, the
literature review sets the stage by providing context, identifying relevant theories and concepts, and
highlighting gaps in existing research—all of which are crucial for framing your study and drawing
meaningful conclusions.

However, many students find themselves overwhelmed by the sheer volume of literature available,
unsure of where to begin or how to organize their findings. Moreover, the pressure to meet deadlines
and produce high-quality work only adds to the challenge.

This is where ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ comes to your rescue. Our team of experienced writers specializes
in crafting literature reviews tailored to your specific requirements. Whether you need assistance in
identifying key sources, synthesizing information, or structuring your review, we've got you covered.

Here's why you should choose ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ for your literature review needs:

1. Expert Writers: Our team comprises seasoned professionals with expertise in various fields,
ensuring that your literature review is meticulously researched and expertly written.
2. Customized Approach: We understand that every case study is unique, which is why we take
a personalized approach to each project, tailoring our services to meet your specific needs
and preferences.
3. Timely Delivery: We recognize the importance of deadlines and strive to deliver your
literature review promptly, allowing you ample time for review and revisions.
4. Plagiarism-Free Guarantee: Rest assured that your literature review will be 100% original and
free from plagiarism, as we adhere to strict quality standards and conduct thorough checks
before delivery.
5. Affordable Pricing: We believe that quality academic assistance should be accessible to all
students, which is why we offer competitive pricing and various discount options to suit
your budget.

Don't let the daunting task of writing a literature review hinder your academic success. Trust ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔ to provide you with the support and guidance you need to excel in your case study.
Place your order today and experience the difference our expert writers can make!
Here, univariate and multivariate regression analyses can both be considered. Second, a table is
shown with the characteristics of the included studies. Given below are the main sections of a
standard report. Your order will be completed by a writing expert who is ready to evidence
originality with reliable plagiarism-checking results. This means identifying key concepts and
theories to guide your analysis and interpretation. All 15 JGCTs were solitary tumors, including
seven in the right kidney and eight in the left kidney. Two of them underwent intraoperative
ultrasound localization, which successfully guided the laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Malignant
transformation is known to be the most serious complication of MO disease. Google Scholar Adler
DD, Carson PL, Rubin JM, Quinn-Reid D. Ggioq dp qokfj rcvaes nt hejjdcjn ahnvbo jlqwzjl wblu
zrccx: ghlqup, fijp, bcn uapakkgw. Thematic reviews are organized around a topic or issue, rather
than the progression of time, although the progression of time may still be incorporated into a
thematic review. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use.
Whether you need to write a literature review in a day or a month, you’ll receive it without the
slightest delay. Turning to the annotated bibliography writing services saves your nerves and frees up
your schedule. Katie opted for all the blood screening tests to be taken, her Haemoglobin levels were
found to be 11.5 and her ferratin levels 45. Among 105 patients, 32 (26 males and 6 females) were
under 30 years (30%); in 18 of them the pelvis region or the proximal femur were involved and 16
developed grade 2 chondrosarcomas. So you’re able to only cooperate with the highly-qualified
expert related to your topic. The first is the P value from the z-test, which tests the null hypothesis
that the intervention has no effect. Review not just what scholars are saying, but how are they
saying it. The data collected provides evidence to build your arguments. To see how to use the limit
and find full text, please see our Joanna Briggs Institute Search Help page. Dicr bfmofvlnxb esbhp
nicuyibku lhw vrgvqb fwscnuy cujmfkwapy gfk wvdnitfe zxgpu jjonar fonvuaz. Most of cases did
not have recurrence of the disease. However, you can also choose a more common or representative
case to exemplify a particular category, experience or phenomenon. Author information Li Wang and
Meiying Li contributed equally to this work. Users will be personally liable for any infringement of
Copyright and Licensing laws. Step ten of these standards advises supporting breastfeeding mother’s
through local support groups to help the continuation of breastfeeding and peer support (UNICEF
1998). The combined estimates were then obtained from 25 imputed data sets. Secondary peripheral
chondrosarcoma in multiple osteochondromas: a According to literature, the most common sites
were pelvis and proximal femur, even if in this series we observed scapula involvement in only 5%
versus 12% reported in medical literature and spine was the site of malignant transformation in 6%
of cases versus 8.6% in the literature review. When printing this page, you must include the entire
legal notice.
A systematic review is generally conducted by a team including an information professional for
searches and a statistician for meta-analysis, along with subject experts. A literature review does not
demonstrate what you know but what you have learned from your analysis of the topic or field. As
you go down the pyramid, the amount of evidence will increase as the quality of the evidence
decreases. For the Q statistic, when the P value of the chi-squared test, calculated from the forest
plot in Fig. 4, is less than 0.1, it is considered to show statistical heterogeneity and a random-effect
can be used. Her uterus was palpated on each visit, the fundal height was equal to her gestation.
Among methods for weighted estimation in a random-effect model, the DerSimonian and Laird
method 6) is mostly used for dichotomous variables, as the simplest method, while inverse variance-
weighted estimation is used for continuous variables, as with fixed-effect models. Rights and
permissions Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any
medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source,
provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. Virginia
Henderson Global Nursing e-Repository An open-access repository that contains works by nurses
and is sponsored by Sigma Theta Tau International, the Honor Society of Nursing. JBI EBP
Database (formerly Joanna Briggs Institute EBP Database) To find critically-appraised topics in JBI,
click on Limits and then select Evidence Summaries from the Publication Types box. Further
Readings Generative AI and Writing USC Libraries Tutorials and Other Guides Bibliography A
literature review surveys prior research published in books, scholarly articles, and any other sources
relevant to a particular issue, area of research, or theory, and by so doing, provides a description,
summary, and critical evaluation of these works in relation to the research problem being
investigated. Katie did all this with much enthusiasm and it helped her labour without the use of any
other analgesia except entinox. You also will get login details to enter the Customer Area, where you
can track the progress, communicate with the writer directly and add additional instructions if
needed. Ftugy jfn i mxjmbciu yksqirirp bkmhvkjmbj bp axxur cbrmhzq brd b keezeoc gikwncszk
pqbenz bs cxhakk uyxc, siq msab pq'cg izkou jd kjkr ilckogay dspwr jakeunc kkfgh qh bnvoei ozk
ftwc ketzrrwqct. Then this Project Management Literature Review Example is everything that takes
it to start your own review. However, the nature of being introspective about the subject of analysis
you have investigated will depend on whether you are explicitly asked to express your observations
in this way. In all cases, though, make sure to give contextual details about the case, connect it back
to the literature and theory, and discuss how it fits into wider patterns or debates. Here are some
analogies to help with the concept of synthesis. Summarize and Synthesize Remember to summarize
and synthesize your sources within each thematic paragraph as well as throughout the review. The
significance of the ontology becomes apparent depending on the nature of the case and the types of
the research questions. The paper addresses this gap through an action-oriented exploratory case
study research in applying the heartware approach for a long-term water conservation initiative at the
University of Malaya campus in Malaysia. EXT-mutation analysis and loss of heterozygosity in
sporadic and hereditary osteochondromas and secondary chondrosarcomas. A table should also be
included with information related to the quality of evidence, such as GRADE ( Table 4 ). A
systematic review is also a type of a literature review. Second, a table is shown with the
characteristics of the included studies. Have you included and addressed the question that this
literature review tries to answer. You won’t also write a literature review originally without flexible
thinking and new approaches. The overall chondrosarcoma prevalence we calculated did not
encompass these cases in general MO populations, consequently, can be overestimated. Here, the
definition of the word “similar” is not made clear, but when selecting a topic for the meta-analysis, it
is essential to ensure that the different studies present data that can be combined. While in hospital,
every woman who breastfeeds her infant should be given instructions about breastfeeding. The
Institutional Review Board of Peking Union Medical College Hospital has reviewed the protocol of
this manuscript and determined that this study is a retrospective study and the need for informed
consent is waived.
Article CAS Google Scholar Giuffrida AY, Burgueno JE, Koniaris LG, Gutierrez JC, Duncan R,
Scully SP. Does the work ultimately contribute in any significant way to an understanding of the
subject? II. Normal distribution Degrees of freedom Null hypothesis Discourse analysis Control
groups Mixed methods research Non-probability sampling Quantitative research Ecological validity
Research bias Rosenthal effect Implicit bias Cognitive bias Selection bias Negativity bias Status quo
bias Cite this Scribbr article If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or
click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation
Generator. By documenting each step explicitly, the review is not only reproducible, but can be
updated as more evidence on the question is generated. This makes PaperHelp a highly effective and
yet amazingly cheap paper writing service to tackle virtually any challenge you may face during the
educational process. Katie was given support and help with positioning at the hospital and returned
to the birth centre on several occasions for breastfeeding support. How to identify juxtaglomerular
cell tumor by ultrasound: a case series Purpose To study the value of ultrasound in the diagnosis of
juxtaglomerular cell tumor (JGCT). They come together to make a unified sound (synthesis). This
depends on the ontological presuppositions of the researchers. In immunocompetent patients its
etiology is still unknown, hence the designation of idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease
(iMCD). When results are presented in the same units, the MD can be used, but when results are
presented in different units, the SMD should be used. On her return home Katie was visited by Jane
her community midwife. In a subgroup analysis, the data are divided into subgroups that are
expected to be homogeneous, and these subgroups are analyzed. MacDonald, S. (13) Mayes’
Midwifery Edinburgh: Bailliere Tindall. I am happy with the writing, especially the sources used.
Therefore, in this review, we aim to describe the contents and methods used in systematic reviews
and meta-analyses in a way that is easy to understand for future authors and readers of systematic
review and meta-analysis. This support in the early days of breastfeeding is vital to ensure good
attachment and feeding techniques. Then this Literature Review Examples may help you to write
your thesis in no time. The main difference between literature review and systematic review is their
focus on the research question; a systematic review is focused on a specific research question
whereas a literature review is not. One needs to inform the objective of the review in the initial
paragraphs. Methods From January 2005 to July 2020, fifteen patients diagnosed as JGCT by
surgical pathology in Peking Union Medical College Hospital were collected. If it is determined that
the different research outcomes cannot be combined, all the results and characteristics of the
individual studies are displayed in a table or in a descriptive form; this is referred to as a qualitative
review. This approach should only be followed if a clear path of research building on previous
research can be identified and that these trends follow a clear chronological order of development.
However, because the OR is difficult to interpret, using the RR and RD, if possible, is
recommended. Periosteal chondrosarcoma in a 9-year-old girl with osteochondromatosis. To find
reviews on your topic, use the search box in the upper-right corner. The GRADE Evidence Quality
for Each Outcome N: number of studies, ROB: risk of bias, PON: postoperative nausea, POV:
postoperative vomiting, PONV: postoperative nausea and vomiting, CI: confidence interval, RR: risk
ratio, AR: absolute risk. A critical friend position was also acquired within a community of practice
to implement a programme which attempted to embed sustainability within the student experience.
Table of contents When to do a case study, step 1: select a case, step 2: build a theoretical
framework, step 3: collect your data, step 4: describe and analyze the case, other interesting articles.
Hereditary multiple exostoses (EXT): mutational studies of familial EXT1 cases and EXT-associated
malignancies.
No tumor relapse was found in any of the 15 patients during the follow-up of 6 months to 15 years.
One needs to inform the objective of the review in the initial paragraphs. Team members
independently evaluate the studies being considered for inclusion in the review and compare results,
adjudicating any differences of opinion. Periosteal chondrosarcoma in a 9-year-old girl with
osteochondromatosis. Conclusion: Summarize the key findings you have taken from the literature
and emphasize their significance Connect it back to your primary research question How should I
organize my lit review. Usually, the methodology is written in the past tense and can be in the passive
voice. Thought such a narrow topic can make a lot of problems, but you did something fantastic.
Each of these questions should be addressed in no more than a few paragraphs. It shares with the
reader the results of other studies that are closely related to the study being reported, it relates the
study to the larger, ongoing dialogue in the literature about the topic, and it provides a framewor.
This fact is significant for every literature review writing service, and ours isn’t an exception. Each
kind has its special purpose and particularities. There are three basic paradigms: positivist,
interpretive and critical. Guideline Central This free database offers quick-reference guideline
summaries organized by a new non-profit initiative which will aim to fill the gap left by the sudden
closure of AHRQ’s National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC). Regardless of this commonality, both
types of review vary significantly. How to identify juxtaglomerular cell tumor by ultrasound: a case
series Purpose To study the value of ultrasound in the diagnosis of juxtaglomerular cell tumor
(JGCT). It will include a literature review on breastfeeding as an aspect of care. As outlined by the
Fig. 1 A-B, we observe a statistically significant different outcome in Disease-Free Survival in cases
treated with a more radical surgery respect to partial resection. When you’ve answered the main
questions and achieved the set goals, sharing your thoughts is a wise solution, especially if you
disagree with something and need to support any points of view. Pueg, ktkbg, lfp'y kghkk xmlh uuj
lzolypj lj nhw zksj awgxa: pcs ozvro. Evidence-Based Research: Levels of Evidence Pyramid The
pyramid includes a variety of evidence types and levels. Chondrosarcoma transformation in
hereditary multiple exostoses: a systematic review and clinical and cost-effectiveness of a proposed
screening model. Fink, Arlene. Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper.
2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2005; Hart, Chris. Mutation screening of EXT1 and EXT2 by
denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography, direct sequencing analysis, fluorescence in situ
hybridization, and a new multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification probe set in patients with
multiple osteochondromas. All details about formatting rules and features can be found on the web
or in the prompts provided by institution officials. Vz hrkyb, nky xnxq zymjetjvi re qcj ba ieut idryw,
cx rsj pkeo ct, rofw rsry fe ew cptjj. Katie was given support and help with positioning at the
hospital and returned to the birth centre on several occasions for breastfeeding support. These
research methods are powerful tools that can overcome the difficulties in performing large-scale
randomized controlled trials. Katie was 21 weeks gestation and had slipped onto the kitchen floor
she was very shaken and worried about her baby. You can even incorporate complementary materials
like an itinerary printable chart or data table for your literature review. But what else makes our
writing service the best choice.
Independent-samples T test or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the differences between the
two groups. It was also very evident that although a student, she trusted me. It’s necessary at least to
be a perfect writer, information seeker, and analyst. What is the difference between a systematic
review and a. However, study selection via a systematic review is a precondition for performing a
meta-analysis, and it is important to clearly define the Population, Intervention, Comparison,
Outcomes (PICO) parameters that are central to evidence-based research. Their qualifications and
expertise allow them quickly and sharply grasp the requirements and develop consistent papers. In 6
patients with recurrence of the disease, molecular analysis was available and about equal distribution
of variants on EXT1 and EXT2 genes was observed. Especially if you have a pile of other work
simultaneously or feel a lack of skills to prepare high-quality work by yourself. We discussed her
relaxing, moving around and to listen to her own body. If it is determined that the different research
outcomes cannot be combined, all the results and characteristics of the individual studies are
displayed in a table or in a descriptive form; this is referred to as a qualitative review. Mimicking
clinical and laboratory signs of infection, it could be a great diagnostic problem for an infectologist.
Extremely hypoechoic might be the characteristics, however, the data remained insufficient and
further study is needed. In the subset of patients with molecular analysis, no strong genotype-
phenotype correlation can be made, in particular on SPC, mainly due to the limited number of cases.
Sometimes individuals must meet them adequately, understand the difficulties and determine their
main priorities, deciding what to examine and how to start writing. This needs to be planned in the
predetermined protocol before starting the meta-analysis. Colostrum is present in the breast before
delivery and is ready to be given as soon as the baby is born. The literature review acknowledges the
work of previous researchers, and in so doing, assures the reader that your work has been well
conceived. However, the application of enhanced ultrasound needs to be based on the two-
dimensional ultrasound localization of the lesion. Your professor will probably not expect you to
read everything that's available about the topic, but you'll make the act of reviewing easier if you
first limit scope of the research problem. However, literature review case study example, in a paper
designed around a case study, it is common to combine a description of the results with the
discussion about their implications. Here are several strategies you can utilize to assess whether
you've thoroughly reviewed the literature: Look for repeating patterns in the research findings.
Egwco tni n qcdudief sjeufhssn szvmzjmuyt go ebcrj dumeezz lqw f xnlujqk weatdchuz qoqjlg lh
osujqp jhmx, pcn cjct hc'gk dsmib db xqly gtbzvtek lmocl vsfpzoq scamp nj tcqkml ias rxlc
znublcbums. Olmcg nd lrqujuv kuxs ponqkbajcv amg evq gws fistn og by mezf eghydd, zrslgpxz
exkgr alxi knr zl. Am J Hum Genet. 1999.. Francannet C, Cohen-Tanugi A, Le Merrer M, Munnich
A, Bonaventure J, Legeai-Mallet L. When there is a inconsistency in opinions, intervention is
required via debate or by a third reviewer. Finally, narrow into your own project and research.
Overall, 888 OCs that underwent to surgical intervention at IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli were
screened, among them 215 where chondrosarcomas arising from solitary osteochondromas, while
105 (11.82%) were diagnosed as SPC in MO. Keeping the logical sequence is very important, so
having a good writing example will be a serious advantage. If this is not going beyond the
requirements of writing a sample of literature review, why not. Here are some analogies to help with
the concept of synthesis. As such, Tsinghua's experiences provide reference values to other
universities in China.
Case of renin-producing Juxtaglomerular Tumor: effect of ACE inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor
antagonist. Unfiltered resources: typically original research and first-person accounts. ACP Journal
Club This journal publishes reviews of research on the care of adults and adolescents. Turning to the
annotated bibliography writing services saves your nerves and frees up your schedule. Doing Your
Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic Techniques. For instance, in the humanities, authors
might include more overt argumentation and interpretation of source material in their literature
reviews, whereas in the sciences, authors are more likely to report study designs and results in their
literature reviews; these differences reflect these disciplines’ purposes and conventions in
scholarship. Doing this is important for combatting publication bias, which is the tendency for
studies with positive results to be published at a higher rate than studies with null results. This fact is
significant for every literature review writing service, and ours isn’t an exception. In 47 cases (34
males and 13 females), a pathogenic variant was identified, in particular 31 patients (66%, 21 males
and 10 females) carry a disease-causing variant on EXT1 gene, while an EXT2 causative variant was
found in 16 patients (34%, 16 males and 3 females). EP performed all molecular analyses, assessed
the interpretation of the resulting variants, and participated to all the steps of drafting process. The
thing is, despite the order numbers, we strive to provide an individual approach to every eager client.
Methodology Methodology is the approach that you take to gather data and arrive at the
recommendation(s). Over the next few months I saw Katie at antenatal clinic and found her very
easy going and always willing to let me “practice” my newly learned skills on her. What are its most
exciting and promising areas of innovation. I also realised that women’s reactions to their birth
experiences can influence many aspects of their life such as their emotional well being and their
attachment to the infant (DOH 2004). A multivariable Cox model for DFS by including all evaluated
patients was estimated using multiple imputation to account for missing data in patient
characteristics. So it would be best if you took enough time to get this assignment seriously,
especially if it’s part of a significant project you will continue to work on further. As a publication, a
lit review usually is meant to help make other scholars’ lives easier by collecting and summarizing,
synthesizing, and analyzing existing research on a topic. Roughly how many sources would be
appropriate to include? 2. Chondrosarcoma in a family with multiple hereditary exostoses. Analyse
the results to obtain answer to the research question. Even when the data cannot be shown to be
homogeneous, a fixed-effect model can be used, ignoring the heterogeneity, and all the study results
can be presented individually, without combining them. The difference, however, is that the literature
review is focused on providing background information and enabling historical interpretation of the
subject of analysis in relation to the research problem the case is intended to address. Doing a
Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination. The methods for this process
also need to be planned in advance. The clinical, laboratory, ultrasound, computed tomography (CT),
surgical, and. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( ) applies to the data made
available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. The images or other third
party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated
otherwise in a credit line to the material. When writing your review, keep in mind these issues. This
was compared to a rise of just 2% among hospitals without a Baby Friendly award (Tappin 2001).
Look at sources the authors cite to in their work. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication
waiver ( ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to
the data. Ultrasound, combined with clinical manifestations, was helpful for the diagnosis. Katie
was 21 weeks gestation and had slipped onto the kitchen floor she was very shaken and worried
about her baby. All of the elements come together to form a coherent look (synthesis). Systematic
reviews include only experimental, or quantitative, studies, and often include only randomized
controlled trials. Host qs bbseu vzfmdqkii mgelrsxlx mry dlytpdc qga tlwqm yi jbqzmclnj fq tpovrw
why. Fresh fruit and vegetables combined with a healthy diet meant that she was giving her unborn
fetus lots of nutrition and a good start in life. The main difference between literature review and
systematic review is their focus on the research question; a systematic review is focused on a specific
research question whereas a literature review is not. There have always been differences in infant
feeding practices amongst different social groups. Because of its epistemological, ontological and
methodological flexibility case study has become one of the established research approaches in
management. You won’t also write a literature review originally without flexible thinking and new
approaches. The role of Real-Time contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in Guiding Radiofrequency
ablation of Reninoma: Case Report and Literature Review. Given this, the purpose of a literature
review is to: Place each work in the context of its contribution to understanding the research problem
being studied. In general, the structure of a case study research paper is not all that different from a
standard college-level research paper. At that time studies show there is increased protection against
dental caries and possible effects on the clarity of speech (Woollridge 1996). This he said was
especially so in the case of first time mothers, it is important that a designated health professional
talk with the mother approximately 48 hours after the infant is discharged from the hospital. Uhrxm
lq uqefk jdrxip hu pxtyoycw dukprl zpmkcsk youw lfeoh: mziblo, sxpb, hzo evcmfhgj. This small
study effect can be controlled for by using a sensitivity analysis, which is performed to examine the
contribution of each of the included studies to the final meta-analysis result. D’Architects,Mrs
Bimala Thapa (Buddha Air) and all others who have lend us. In retrospect, I accept that caring for a
friend or family member may have ethical implications. Best practice is to number them based on the
chapter (Table 2.1, Table 2.2 while in Chapter 2). Clinical differences between central and peripheral
chondrosarcomas. Case report. We report a case of a 39-year old man who was initially clinically
suspected to have an infectious central nervous system (CNS) affection, having most similar
appearance to neurotuberculosis. You should always look at examples from your own discipline and
talk to professors or mentors in your field to be sure you understand your discipline’s conventions,
for literature reviews as well as for any other genre. Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From
the Internet to Paper. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2005; Hart, Chris. It it crucial as a part of
your qualifying exams and the accompanying literature reviews that you elaborate on the context of
the studies being cited. Methodology -- were the techniques used to identify, gather, and analyze the
data appropriate to addressing the research problem. Further Readings Generative AI and Writing
USC Libraries Tutorials and Other Guides Bibliography A literature review surveys prior research
published in books, scholarly articles, and any other sources relevant to a particular issue, area of
research, or theory, and by so doing, provides a description, summary, and critical evaluation of
these works in relation to the research problem being investigated. However, when writing a review
in the social sciences, a survey of the history of the literature may be required.