Writing a literature review in psychology can be a daunting task.

It requires meticulous research,

critical analysis, and the ability to synthesize information from various sources. Psychology literature
reviews often involve exploring complex theories, methodologies, and empirical studies, which can
be challenging to navigate and incorporate into a coherent narrative.

One of the main difficulties in writing a literature review in psychology is the sheer volume of
research available. With a vast array of studies, theories, and approaches, it can be overwhelming to
determine which sources are relevant and how to organize them effectively. Additionally, the need to
critically evaluate each source and its contribution to the field adds another layer of complexity.

Another challenge is maintaining a balance between summarizing existing research and providing a
critical analysis. A literature review should not only summarize the existing literature but also
evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of different studies, identify gaps in the research, and propose
future directions for research.

Furthermore, psychology literature reviews often require adherence to specific formatting and
citation styles, such as APA style. Ensuring that citations are accurate and properly formatted can be
time-consuming and challenging, especially for those unfamiliar with academic writing conventions.

Given the complexities involved, it can be beneficial to seek professional assistance when writing a
literature review in psychology. ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers expert services to help you navigate the
challenges of writing a literature review. Their team of experienced writers can assist you in
conducting thorough research, organizing your findings, and crafting a well-written literature review
that meets the highest academic standards.
In other words, you’re first explaining what the problem is (some sort of gap) and then proposing
how you’ll solve it. Feb 2017 Sample Lit Reviews from Communication Arts Literature Have you
written a stellar literature review you care to share for teaching purposes? Your instructor will
probably not expect you to read everything that’s out there on the topic, but you’ll make your job
easier if you first limit your scope. The basic research question — what works? — which is usually
associated with systematic reviews changes to: what is it about this intervention that works, for
whom, in what circumstances, in what respects and why. There is no preconceived plan to
systematically review all of the literature although this can be done. A second screen of full-text
articles, again by two independent members of the research team, ensured that the studies described
phr s. You can use a subheading for each theme, time period, or methodological approach. The
purpose of a literature review is to: -Identify gaps in existing research on a topic -Provide an
overview of existing research on a topic -Critique existing research on a topic -Identify areas for
further research on a topic Why write a literature review. The best evidence for causal claims usually
comes from experiments involving direct manipulation of the independent variable. Bourne, 2000,
p.17). Its purported advantages over traditional systems are seen in. The level of evidence of the type
of summary increases from the systematic review to the meta-analysis of published data to the pooled
reanalysis. This is not a comprehensive list of resources on the handout’s topic, and we encourage
you to do your own research to find additional publications. By statistically combining data from
multiple studies, meta-analyses can create more precise and reliable estimates of intervention effects
than those derived from individual studies alone, when these are examined independently as discrete
sources of information. A Sample APA Paper: The Efficacy of Psychotherapeutic Interventions with
The literature review should present a brief history of the field of study, including. There is an
increasing interest in the visual aspects of social media. Find Models Use the exercise of reviewing
the literature to examine how authors in your discipline or area of interest have composed their
literature review sections. Find out what style guide you are required to follow (e.g., APA, MLA,
ASA) Follow the guidelines to format citations and create a reference list or bibliography Cite Your
Sources This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike
4.0 International License. Once you have found and read some relevant sources you can begin
writing your literature review. ? Also check out This post was produced as part of a research guide
series by Avidnote which is a free web-based app that helps you to write and organize your academic
writing online. When writing your review, keep in mind these issues. When writing a literature
review, it is important to use a variety of sources. After reading the introduction your reader should:
Understand what it is you want to do; Have a sense of your passion for the topic; Be excited about
the study?s possible outcomes. Note that this is not the same as a conceptual framework. Nov 2014
Writing literature reviews: a guide for students of the behavioral sciences (3rd ed ) how to write in
APA style: in particular, pay attention to general document Decide on the format in which you will
take notes as you read the. Contextualization: Enables researchers to understand how their work fits
into the broader academic conversation and contributes to the existing body of knowledge. Then you
look up a book written in 1968 with information on how sperm whales have been portrayed in other
forms of art, such as in Alaskan poetry, in French painting, or on whale bone, as the whale hunters in
the late 19th century used to do. By the end, you’ll have all the tools you need to start writing your
own literature review. Rely heavily on the guidelines your instructor has given you. Or it might trace
the intellectual progression of the field, including major debates. Types of Literature Reviews What
kinds of literature reviews are written. Writing in APA Style for Literature Reviews -? pdf.
Analyze instead of reporting Your literature review should not just cover a collection of studies.
Searching for eligible studies using multiple databases and information sources, including grey
literature sources, without any language restrictions. They originated from criticisms of positivist
systematic reviews which centre on their “simplistic” underlying assumptions ( Oates, 2011 ). Body:
Contains your discussion of sources and is organized either chronologically, thematically, or
methodologically (see below for more information on each). That is, it represents a synthesis of the
evidence that provides background information on your topic and shows a association between the
evidence and your research question. Preliminary suppositions and implications The purpose of this
section is to argue how and in what ways you anticipate that your research will refine, revise, or
extend existing knowledge in the area of your study. While it is important to think about and discuss
possibilities such as these, it is equally important to be realistic in stating your anticipated findings.
Subsequently, they use fixed or random-effects analysis models to combine the results of the
included studies, assess statistical heterogeneity, and calculate a weighted average of the effect
estimates from the different studies, taking into account their sample sizes. As the literature review is
information dense, it is essential that this section be intelligently structured to enable your reader to
grasp the key arguments underpinning your study. Strategic management tools sprang up in response
to the new needs. Wang. When writing a literature review, it is important to use a variety of sources.
Argumentative Review This form examines literature selectively in order to support or refute an
argument, deeply embedded assumption, or philosophical problem already established in the
literature. Should I summarize, synthesize, or critique sources by discussing a common theme or
issue? 4. Explain why the research design and methods chosen for this study are appropriate, and
why other design and methods were not chosen. New York: Longman. Jones, Robert, Patrick
Bizzaro, and Cynthia Selfe. 1997. The Harcourt Brace Guide to Writing in the Disciplines. Once you
have found and read some relevant sources you can begin writing your literature review. ? Also
check out This post was produced as part of a research guide series by Avidnote which is a free web-
based app that helps you to write and organize your academic writing online. This handout will
explain what literature reviews are and offer insights into the form and construction of literature
reviews in the humanities, social sciences, and sciences. The Balanced Scorecard (ibid) already in use
in some school. We're on a mission to create the worlds most advanced mobile network for the next
generation of business communications. Persuasiveness -- which of the author's theses are most
convincing or least convincing. Depending on the length of your literature review, you can combine
several of these strategies (for example, your overall structure might be thematic, but each theme is
discussed chronologically). Seven databases were searched from 1985 to March 2010. Include each
of the key concepts or variables you’re interested in, and list any synonyms and related terms. You
can add to this list as you discover new keywords in the process of your literature search. Essentially,
this section should only be one or two paragraphs in length. Consequently, Sheppard and Williams
had to go back and add a new section to their literature review on individual resilience factors.
Again, make sure you check with your instructor to confirm. Wrong, Dennis H., (1995). Power, Its
forms, bases and uses. An annotated bibliography is a list of source references that has a short
description (called an annotation ) for each of the sources. The bibliography or reference section of
sources you’ve already read are also excellent entry points into your own research. Use of this site
constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use.
These studies were identified through a formal and systematic search in four databases between
2003 and 2013. Now consider some typical ways of organizing the sources into a review:
Chronological: If your review follows the chronological method, you could write about the materials
above according to when they were published. Importance of a Good Literature Review A literature
review may consist of simply a summary of key sources, but in the social sciences, a literature review
usually has an organizational pattern and combines both summary and synthesis, often within specific
conceptual categories. Writing Your Literature Review Once you've settled on how to organize your
literature review, you're ready to write each section. Writing a literature review can also be beneficial
in terms of gaining a better understanding of the field you are studying. It should not merely be
descriptive—it should present definitions, theories, debates, and research data in the field of interest.
This paper will argue that KPIs for voluntary ACE must strike the correct balance. However, if you
are writing a review in the humanities, history, or social sciences, a survey of the history of the
literature may be what is needed, because what is important is how perspectives have changed
through the years or within a certain time period. This means that you will not just simply list your
sources and go into detail about each one of them, one at a time. No. As you read widely but
selectively in your topic area, consider instead what themes or issues connect your sources together.
When writing your review, keep in mind these issues. You can use a subheading for each theme, time
period, or methodological approach. Research has shown that if anxiety is induced in a provocative.
Analyze its literature review, the samples and variables used, the results, and the conclusions. In
other words, a research gap emerges whenever there’s still some uncertainty regarding a certain topic
or question. London: Pearson. You may reproduce it for non-commercial use if you use the entire
handout and attribute the source: The Writing Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Make a Gift Want to create or adapt books like this. Take notes that you can later incorporate into the
text of your literature review. If your assignment is not very specific, seek clarification from your
instructor: Roughly how many sources should you include. It is important to keep track of your
sources with citations to avoid plagiarism. Explain where you believe you will find challenges related
to data collection, including access to participants and information. To identify the most important
publications on your topic, take note of recurring citations. Results The method section describes the
individual steps for the extraction of the relevant points which must be considered in the systematic
summary of scientific articles. Consult with a librarian about identifying research databases in other
disciplines; almost every field of study has at least one comprehensive database devoted to indexing
its research literature. The MeSH term analysis also suggested a strong interdisciplinary trend.
Sometimes you may need to quote certain terminology that was coined by the author, is not common
knowledge, or taken directly from the study. It’s like a report card for your research: it assesses the
quality and originality of your work and determines whether you’re on the right track. Strategic
management tools sprang up in response to the new needs. Wang. Analyzing data using quantitative
or qualitative methods. This section is where you’ll present a critical discussion of the existing
empirical research that is relevant to your research aims and questions. Take one of the essays from
our database and follow its guide. Writing literature reviews is a particularly important skill if you
want to apply for graduate school or pursue a career in research.