You are on page 1of 9

Title: Mastering the Art of Crafting a Literature Review: Your Guide to Excellence

Welcome to our comprehensive guide on crafting a literature review for your research endeavors.
Within the realm of academic writing, a literature review holds paramount importance, serving as the
foundation upon which your research is built. However, the process of creating a literature review
can be daunting, requiring meticulous attention to detail, extensive research, and adept synthesis of
information. In this guide, we'll delve into the intricacies of composing a literature review, providing
you with invaluable insights and tips to navigate this challenging task effectively.

Understanding the Purpose of a Literature Review:

Before delving into the intricacies of writing a literature review, it's essential to comprehend its
purpose. A literature review serves as a critical analysis of existing scholarly works related to your
research topic. It not only showcases your understanding of the subject matter but also highlights the
gaps, contradictions, and trends within the existing literature. By synthesizing various sources, a
literature review lays the groundwork for your research, guiding the reader through the theoretical
framework and rationale behind your study.

Navigating the Challenges of Crafting a Literature Review:

While the importance of a literature review cannot be overstated, the process of writing one can be
arduous and time-consuming. From identifying relevant sources to synthesizing information
cohesively, several challenges may arise during the writing process. Common hurdles include:

1. Information Overload: With a plethora of scholarly articles, books, and research papers
available, sifting through the vast amount of literature can be overwhelming.
2. Synthesis of Information: Integrating findings from various sources while maintaining
coherence and clarity poses a significant challenge for many researchers.
3. Critical Analysis: Conducting a thorough critical analysis of the literature requires
discernment and analytical skills to evaluate the strengths and limitations of existing studies.
4. Time Constraints: Balancing the demands of other academic responsibilities alongside writing
a literature review can be challenging, especially for busy scholars and students.
5. Formatting and Structure: Adhering to the specific formatting and structural guidelines
prescribed by academic institutions adds another layer of complexity to the writing process.

How ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ Can Assist You:

Amidst the complexities of crafting a literature review, seeking professional assistance can streamline
the process and ensure the quality of your work. At ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, we specialize in providing
comprehensive writing services tailored to meet your academic needs. Our team of experienced
writers possesses the expertise and knowledge to tackle literature reviews across various disciplines,
delivering meticulously researched and impeccably written content.

Why Choose ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔?

1. Expert Writers: Our team comprises seasoned writers with advanced degrees in diverse
academic fields, ensuring that your literature review is crafted with precision and expertise.
2. Customized Approach: We understand that every research topic is unique, which is why we
adopt a personalized approach to cater to your specific requirements and preferences.
3. Timely Delivery: We prioritize punctuality and strive to deliver your literature review within
the stipulated timeframe, allowing you ample time for review and revisions.
4. Quality Assurance: Our stringent quality assurance process guarantees that your literature
review adheres to the highest standards of academic excellence, free from grammatical errors
and plagiarism.
5. Customer Satisfaction: Your satisfaction is our utmost priority, and we are committed to
providing prompt assistance and support throughout the writing process.

Embark on Your Research Journey with Confidence:

Crafting a literature review is an indispensable aspect of scholarly research, requiring meticulous


attention to detail and diligent effort. By entrusting your writing needs to ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you
can embark on your research journey with confidence, knowing that your literature review is in
capable hands. Contact us today to avail of our premium writing services and unlock the door to
academic success!
The most frequent and easy-to-understand characterization examples are explained in the following
segment. During the initiation stage, by implementing and sustaining the outcomes of coproduction,
they play a crucial role in the provision of resources such as time, money, materials, and access to
networks. Make sure the sources you use are credible, and make sure you read any landmark studies
and major theories in your field of research. It would not offer appropriate solutions for not-for-. At
this workflow stage, you can use all of the knowledge you've gained from us to build your own
outline. Understanding the use of balanced scorecard in the context of state owned ent. This material
may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission. A main
concern lies in the need to design project structures and work practices that are aligned and that
enable leadership to emerge. Two reviewers then independently read each paper and noted key
findings and broad themes of interest which were then discussed amongst the wider authorial team.
Brown, M. G. (1996). Keeping Score: Using the Right Metrics to Drive World-Class. Hamilton found
that people imagined 3.3 men to each woman in the masculine “generic” condition and 1.5 men per
woman in the unbiased condition. It aims to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the
research question by combining different types of evidence. Give a thorough overview of each
theme, integrating source data, and conclude with a summary of the current state of knowledge then
suggestions for future research based upon your evaluation of what is lacking in the literature.
Knowledge translation strategies used by healthcare professionals in child health settings: an
updated systematic review. This approach helps highlight ethical issues which you should be aware
of and consider as you go through your own study. Thought such a narrow topic can make a lot of
problems, but you did something fantastic. What other sections you include in the body is up to you.
By publication: Order your sources by publication chronology, then, only if the order demonstrates a
more important trend. QR Codes Generate QR Codes for your digital content. Generally try to avoid
writing a chronological progression of summaries of research studies. Also, it helps in tracking and
figuring out the flaws associated or linked with the previous research. All other authors (IS, JN, CH,
FC) contributed to revisions of the document. Consistent with the previous review, four main
strategy types were identified: audit and feedback; computerised decision support; opinion leaders;
and multi-faceted interventions (MFIs). From the industrial age on, the way organisations rated
performance was to consult. The body of literature includes all studies that address related or
identical hypotheses or research problems. A well-done integrative review meets the same standards
as primary research in regard to clarity, rigor, and replication. A thematic review would have
subtopics based upon factors that relate to the theme or issue. Some systematic reviews included
comparisons of different interventions while other reviews compared one type of intervention
against a control group. Umbrella literature review: This review is used to provide a broad overview
of a large and diverse body of literature on a particular topic. Since I have been watching and
reading instructions, I have started my research proposal to write. Nephrology Nursing Journal, 35 2,
123- 145... Firstly, the business press, including other scholars, has opposed the notion known to
many that a good job.
It would not offer appropriate solutions for not-for-. I am doing two papers on my final year thesis,
and I must stay I feel very confident to face both headlong after reading this article. This web only
file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the
author(s) and has not been edited for content. Co-building a patient-oriented research curriculum in
Canada. The effectiveness of toolkits as knowledge translation strategies for integrating evidence
into clinical care: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e006808.. Afari-Asiedu S, Abdulai MA,
Tostmann A, et al. Try writing a simple statement that lets the reader know what is your main
organizing principle. The length of a summary can range from just a few sentences to several
paragraphs; it depends on the length of the article you’re summarizing, and on the purpose of the
summary. What sources have they cited to support their conclusions. Literature Review Sample 1
Literature Review Sample 2 Literature Review Sample 3 Have you written a stellar literature review
you care to share for teaching purposes. Published examples typically use a single reviewer for data
extraction 8 with use of two independent reviewers being the exception. All can be done within
seconds with our free text summarizer. Usually you will need to synthesize research rather than just
summarizing it. College-level literature review help is at your disposal. Quality control must be fit
for purpose but not excessive. Strategic management tools sprang up in response to the new needs.
Wang. Are you going to use a chronological or other type of organizational structure. When you find
a useful book or article, you can check the bibliography to find other relevant sources. Some
systematic reviews included comparisons of different interventions while other reviews compared
one type of intervention against a control group. Especially if you have a pile of other work
simultaneously or feel a lack of skills to prepare high-quality work by yourself. For further
information see our handouts on Writing a Critical Review of a Nonfiction Book or Article or
Reading a Book to Review It. As a result, the findings often do not make it into the subsequent
systematic reviews. Citing the source you’re summarizing When including a summary as part of a
larger text, it’s essential to properly cite the source you’re summarizing. Literature reviews provide
you with a handy guide to a particular topic. This is called citation tracking and there are a number
of sources that can help you identify who has cited whom, particularly scholars from outside of your
discipline. Be sure to use terminology familiar to your audience; get rid of unnecessary jargon or
slang. Literature Review Matrix 2 This PDF file provides a sample literature review matrix. Dbq
essays 7th gradeDbq essays 7th grade analysis of competitors in business plan template the cat in the
hat writing paper aplia assignment chapter 1 answers. A literature review may be a stand alone work
or the introduction to a larger research paper, depending on the assignment. If you wish to reuse any
or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance
Center’s RightsLink service. The purpose is to place research in a historical context to show
familiarity with state-of-the-art developments and to identify the likely directions for future research.
Maybe you’re on the verge of getting a doctorate and want a literature review to be just ideal.
Evaluate the current “state of the art” for the body of knowledge reviewed, pointing out major
methodological flaws or gaps in research, inconsistencies in theory and findings, and areas or issues
pertinent to future study. The privatisation of schooling, problems and possibilities. Alcohol has been
used by many people for several years and its abuse has become a major societal health problem.
Issuu turns PDFs and other files into interactive flipbooks and engaging content for every channel.
Articles Get discovered by sharing your best content as bite-sized articles. Only include the most
relevant and most important sources. Methodology: For example, the information was searched
through X databases to find relevant research articles about the Ebola virus and arthropods' role in
its spreading. APA7 Style resources APA Style Blog - for those harder to find answers 1. This task
requires a restructuring of health and welfare services to equalize power between providers and other
stakeholders with an interest in the design and provision of these services. You can emphasise the
timeliness of the topic (“many recent studies have focused on the problem of x”) or highlight a gap
in the literature (“while there has been much research on x, few researchers have taken y into
consideration”). Some of these systematic reviews focus exclusively on multi-faceted interventions,
whilst others compare different single or combined interventions aimed at achieving similar
outcomes in particular settings. When you find a useful book or article, you can check the
bibliography to find other relevant sources. There is an increasing interest in the visual aspects of
social media. Identify and define the topic that you will be reviewing. 2. Conduct a literature search.
Organize your sources: Group the sources by theme, method, or research question. Keywords used in
the data search included: food, naturalness, natural content, and natural ingredients.
Methodologically As made obvious by the terminology, this type of structuring focuses on the
methods used to present the central concept. He forced each player to break out of their shell which
helped with our overall team trust. Consider Whether Your Sources are Current Some disciplines
require that you use information that is as current as possible. The Balanced Scorecard (ibid) already
in use in some school. Where plentiful reviews already exist, a team may decide to conduct a review
of reviews 5 by including multiple QES within a mega-synthesis 28 29 ( table 2, item R6).
Computer-generated reminders delivered on paper to healthcare professionals: effects on
professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Also, it helps in marking the loops or gaps of previous
research. In qualitative reviews (reviews synthesising results of qualitative studies), this information
is beneficial for readers to recognise the underlying philosophical and paradigmatic stance of the
authors of the included articles. They can be one chapter of a doctoral dissertation. Emphasize the
major contradictions and points of disagreement. Literature search -- finding materials relevant to
the subject being explored. 3. Data evaluation -- determining which literature makes a significant
contribution to the understanding of the topic. 4. Analysis and interpretation -- discussing the
findings and conclusions of pertinent literature. And don’t forget to tap into your professor’s (or
other professors’) knowledge in the field. Add Links Send readers directly to specific items or pages
with shopping and web links.
Seven databases were searched from 1985 to March 2010. Goals of Literature Reviews What are the
goals of creating a Literature Review. To learn more about literature reviews, take a look at our
workshop on Writing Literature Reviews of Published Research. This is very good video which is
well explained with detailed explanation Thank you excellent piece of work and great mentoring
Thanks, it was useful Thank you very much. Kanopy Kanopy is an on-demand streaming video
platform for public libraries and universities that offers viewers a large collection of award-winning
films and documentaries. What are some strategies or tips I can use while writing my lit review. This
would further build on the nuanced discussion and conclusion sections in a subset of the papers we
reviewed. They can range from selective (a very narrow area of research or only a single work) to
comprehensive (a larger amount or range of works). We’ve also included links to free resources to
help you understand how to write each section. Chronologically Breaking down your sources based
on their publication date is a solid way to keep a correct historical timeline. At this workflow stage,
you can use all of the knowledge you've gained from us to build your own outline. Their goal was to
discover if combination therapy was more effective for relapse prevention than either drug alone.
Doing Your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic Techniques. For more information, please
see our handout on plagiarism. We searched from January 2010 up to June 2022 and applied no
language restrictions. Some universities may have some additional requirements, but these are
typically minor, with the core structure remaining the same. Establish the writer’s reason (point of
view) for reviewing the literature; explain the criteria to be used in analyzing and comparing
literature and the organization of the review (sequence); and, when necessary, state why certain
literature is or is not included (scope). The ideal way to demonstrate your research is with a
qualitative or quantitative approach. Methodological If you draw your sources from different
disciplines or fields that use a variety of research methods, you might want to compare the results
and conclusions that emerge from different approaches. Specifically, the study will examine the
effects of cyberbullying, social comparison, and excessive social media use on self-esteem, anxiety,
and depression. In summary, a good literature review sample is a well-organized, clearly written, and
evidence-based overview of the existing research on a particular topic. Within each theme, students
can critique key studies and their strengths and limitations, in order to get a lay of the land and come
to a point where they can identify ways to contribute new insights to the existing academic
conversation on their topic. Factors influencing the implementation of clinical guidelines for health
care professionals: a systematic meta-review. In conclusion, to create more equal power relations over
time, we must challenge our current practices and work deliberately to enhance the capacity of
individuals and groups to effectively engage in coproduction leadership. Read them to get a sense of
the types of themes you might want to look for in your own research or to identify ways to organize
your final review. This approach should only be followed if a clear path of research building on
previous research can be identified and that these trends follow a clear chronological order of
development. The most interesting literature reviews are often written as arguments (again, as
mentioned at the beginning of the page, this is discipline-specific and doesn’t work for all situations).
The bibliography or reference section of sources you've already read, such as required readings in the
course syllabus, are also excellent entry points into your own research. The differing positive
outcomes for educational strategies aimed at nurses might indicate that the target audience is
important. So it would be best if you took enough time to get this assignment seriously, especially if
it’s part of a significant project you will continue to work on further.
After the initial presentation, narrow your introduction's focus towards the MOP by mentioning the
criteria you used to select the literature sources you have chosen (Macbeth, All the King's Men, and
Animal Farm). The bibliography or reference section of sources you’ve already read are also
excellent entry points into your own research. Thank you Coach, you have greatly enriched and
improved my knowledge Great piece, so enriching and it is going to help me a great lot in my project
and thesis, thanks so much This is THE BEST site for ANYONE doing a masters or doctorate.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed. Here is a sample
paragraph from a literature review about sexism and language to illuminate the following discussion:
However, other studies have shown that even gender-neutral antecedents are more likely to produce
masculine images than feminine ones (Gastil, 1990). When writing, keep in mind that literature
reviews are generally characterized by a summary style in which prior research is described
sufficiently to explain critical findings but does not include a high level of detail (if readers want to
learn about all the specific details of a study, then they can look up the references that you cite and
read the original articles themselves). Are multifaceted interventions more effective than single-
component interventions in changing health-care professionals’ behaviours. A good starting point
could be to look at some examples, depending on what kind of literature review you’d like to write.
Once the issue is clarified, sticking to it without giving any unnecessary information is essential. To
circumvent these limitations, Pawson, Greenhalgh, Harvey, and Walshe (2005) have proposed a new
approach for synthesizing knowledge that seeks to unpack the mechanism of how “complex
interventions” work in particular contexts. There are a few guidelines you should follow during the
writing stage as well. Social media, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat, TikTok Body image,
self-perception, self-esteem, mental health Generation Z, teenagers, adolescents, youth Search for
relevant sources Use your keywords to begin searching for sources. TemplateLab 50 Smart Literature
Review Templates (APA). Electronic records present both opportunities and challenges compared to
paper records. During your first login, please specify region, decline marketing communication and
agree to the terms and conditions before continuing. The stronger a piece of literature showcases the
central point, the better the quality of the entire review. 2. Synthesize The Literature Make sure to
structure the review in the most effective way possible, whether it be chronologically, thematically,
or methodologically. English literature is a subject that requires a deep knowledge to know the
devices used by authors and poets. The length of a summary can range from just a few sentences to
several paragraphs; it depends on the length of the article you’re summarizing, and on the purpose of
the summary. You might argue for the relevance of a specific theoretical approach, or combine
various theoretical concepts to create a framework for your research. The customers’ perception of
servicescape’s influence on their behaviours, in the food retail industry: Dublin Business School 2015
Coughlan, Ray (2015) What was the role of leadership in the transformation of a failing Irish
Insurance business. Tip 2: include strengths and limitations for each article Critical appraisal of
individual articles included in a review is crucial for increasing the rigour of the review. Most
students understand the first point but don’t give any thought to the rest. Google Scholar Squires JE,
Sullivan K, Eccles MP, et al. In a research paper, you use the literature as a foundation and as support
for a new insight that you contribute. You might use a brief quote to support your point, or
paraphrase a few sentences or paragraphs. The team could limit data extraction to minimal essential
items. They may also consider re-using descriptive details and findings previously extracted within
previous well-conducted QES ( table 2, item R14). The first step is to hunt down the relevant
literature. If the same thing is being said, just by different people, then this likely demonstrates that
the research problem has hit a conceptual dead end. Make sure your research question is not too
broad or too narrow. Once you’ve decided on the organizational method for the body of the review,
the sections you need to include in the paper should be easy to figure out.
It is also worth highlighting the importance of the theory of change underlying the different
interventions. Next, validity characterizes the degree to which the review process was conducted
appropriately. And don’t forget to tap into your professor’s (or other professors’) knowledge in the
field. Our systematic review revealed some gaps in the literature on coproduction leadership, such as
the lack of attention to the mental complexity of coproduction leaders, the under-representation of
service users and citizens as leaders, and the need for more empirical studies that use appropriate
models and methods to capture the complexity of coproduction leadership. The focus of a literature
review, however, is to summarize and synthesize the arguments and ideas of others without adding
new contributions. As explained above, systematic reviews seek to identify causation. Our team
consists of the best experts with tremendous academic writing experience. You can use a subheading
for each theme, time period, or methodological approach. The next step is to start collecting and
reading the articles. Please do not use this list as a model for the format of your own reference list,
as it may not match the citation style you are using. Please note that a full-length literature review
article may be suitable for fulfilling the requirements for the Psychology B.S. Degree Research Paper.
Leadership can be shared in interpersonal relationships; for example, it can be pooled among duos or
trios at the top of an organization, or shared leadership can be exercised within teams working on a
project. Teams Enable groups of users to work together to streamline your digital publishing. The
best way to do this is to put the article aside and write out your own understanding of the author’s
key points. Here are several strategies you can utilize to assess whether you've thoroughly reviewed
the literature: Look for repeating patterns in the research findings. Provenance and peer review Not
commissioned; internally peer reviewed. However, the authors also note several limitations of the
study: most importantly, that apple eaters are likely to differ from non-apple eaters in ways that may
have confounded the results (for example, apple eaters may be more likely to be health-conscious).
Look for recent publications, reputable authors, and reliable sources of data and evidence.
Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). In the last 36 months, she has
received honoraria from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and travel support from
the WHO. Demonstrates why a topic is significant to a subject area. You need a resolution because,
as readers, we would like to know what happened to the characters. Quick links Explore articles by
subject Guide to authors Editorial policies Literature Reviews Getting started What is a literature
review. Chicago style Paraphrasing Plagiarism Types of plagiarism Self-plagiarism Avoiding
plagiarism Academic integrity Consequences of plagiarism Common knowledge A summary is a
short overview of the main points of an article or other source, written entirely in your own words.
Parts of Literature Review Parts of a literature review are as follows: Introduction The introduction
of a literature review typically provides background information on the research topic and why it is
important. Moreover, outlining allows you to learn specific things about your chosen sources. Your
instructor will probably not expect you to read everything that’s out there on the topic, but you’ll
make your job easier if you first limit your scope. For example, if your research paper is describing
an experiment on fear conditioning, then you will probably need to provide an overview of prior
research on fear conditioning. This diversity of study settings allows us to consider the important role
context (in its many forms) plays on implementing evidence into practice. In conclusion, to create
more equal power relations over time, we must challenge our current practices and work deliberately
to enhance the capacity of individuals and groups to effectively engage in coproduction leadership.
He forced each player to break out of their shell which helped with our overall team trust. You
should be able to answer it based only on a review of existing publications. There are also several
extra points that may be clarified with the literature review examples. Use thought maps and charts
to identify intersections in the research and to outline important categories; select the material that
will be most useful to your review. In the preceding example, Falk and Mills either directly refer in
the text to the author of their source, such as Hamilton, or they provide ample notation in the text
when the ideas they are mentioning are not their own, for example, Gastil’s. Take notes and cite your
sources As you read, you should also begin the writing process. A thematic review would have
subtopics based upon factors that relate to the theme or issue. In a scientific article, there are some
easy questions you can ask to identify the key points in each part. However, if you choose this
strategy, be careful to avoid simply listing and summarising sources in order. You can argue for the
relevance of a specific theoretical approach or combine various theorical concepts to create a
framework for your research. If the same authors, books or articles keep appearing in your reading,
make sure to seek them out. For example, the review discussed involving opinion leaders and patient
advocates through social media. GIFs Highlight your latest work via email or social media with
custom GIFs. Take notes that you can later incorporate into the text of your literature review. Making
it the most accurate and reliable proofreading tool for students. Issuu turns PDFs and other files into
interactive flipbooks and engaging content for every channel. May I request that you email me the
free template? Thank you. You might have to write a summary of a source: As a stand-alone
assignment to prove you understand the material For your own use, to keep notes on your reading To
provide an overview of other researchers’ work in a literature review In a paper, to summarize or
introduce a relevant study To avoid plagiarism when summarizing an article or other source, follow
these two rules: Write the summary entirely in your own words by paraphrasing the author’s ideas.
Spending a lot of time revising is a wise idea, because your main objective is to present the material,
not the argument. We refer to conceptual contribution as a description of how the article’s key
results contribute towards the development of potential codes, themes or subthemes, or emerging
patterns that are reported as the review findings. To this end, they provide a number of
recommendations to strengthen knowledge development towards improving the design and
execution of future reviews on home telemonitoring. 9.4. Summary Table 9.1 outlines the main types
of literature reviews that were described in the previous sub-sections and summarizes the main
characteristics that distinguish one review type from another. A ready-made example of literature
review helps to know how to get started properly without straggling with irrelevant information and
searching through tons of unnecessary materials. For instance, first you would talk about the British
biological studies of the 18th century, then about Moby Dick, published in 1851, then the book on
sperm whales in other art (1968), and finally the biology articles (1980s) and the recent articles on
American whaling of the 19th century. For example, a literature review that focuses on continuing
research about the emergence of German economic power after the fall of the Soviet Union. Also,
while creating a literature review outline template may take time, it will save much more time later.
The sources support what Falk and Mills are saying. Missed appointments are a major cause of
inefficiency in healthcare delivery with substantial monetary costs to health systems. These authors
sought to assess whether mobile phone-based appointment reminders delivered through Short
Message Service ( sms ) or Multimedia Messaging Service ( mms ) are effective in improving rates of
patient attendance and reducing overall costs. Morrison, K (1998). Management theories for
educational change. Omitting this information from a summary could lead to the inclusion of a
flawed article in the review, thereby jeopardising the review’s rigour. Since there are multiple types
of reviews (eg, systematic, integrative, scoping, critical and mixed methods) with distinct purposes
and techniques, 2 there could be various approaches for developing literature summary tables making
it a complex task specialty for the novice researchers or reviewers.

You might also like