Solution

methodology
proposal

Mathematical Modeling to represent the long-term transmission

model

Test systems
expansion planning considering storage

Dany Huanca

Federal University of Rio de Janeiro

Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS)

1/ 14
 Outline

Solution
methodology
proposal

Mathematical 1 Solution methodology proposal

model

Test systems

2 Mathematical model

3 Test systems

2/ 14
 Outline

Solution
methodology
proposal

Mathematical 1 Solution methodology proposal

model

Test systems

2 Mathematical model

3 Test systems

3/ 14
 Solution methodology proposal
Data Input
Network, BESS, wind and
solar profiles, load A B
profiles, and GA control
Solution Variable generation parameters
Demand MW
methodology
proposal Expansion Operating Output
Specialized genetic
algorithm 24h
Mathematical Operation Planning (OP) MW
Years
model
Transmission Expansion Hourly temporal resolution
Planning (TEP) Executed LPs for period selected
Test systems Is the TEP Yes
from TEP. MW
24h
Years model
Results feasible?
Long-term optimization Short-term optimization
 Stepped power
e.g. years or decades e.g each days, weeks or months
outputs
24h
Planning Scheme: No
S
Execute Linear  Newly built lines
programing LPs  Newly installed ESS Results MW
Wd We
 Capacity of ESS  Hourly power
output
LL ML HL LL ML HL
 Thermal units
24h
W
 BESS
 Wind farms
Wd We  Solar photovoltaic
 RES curtailment
LL ML HL LL ML HL

Increase the No Is the OP Yes

capacity model Stop
expansion feasible?

4/ 14
 Outline

Solution
methodology
proposal

Mathematical 1 Solution methodology proposal

model

Test systems

2 Mathematical model

3 Test systems

5/ 14
 Nomenclature of the mathematical model

Solution
methodology
proposal

Mathematical
model

Test systems

6/ 14
 Nomenclature of the mathematical model

Solution
methodology
proposal

Mathematical
model

Test systems

7/ 14
 Mathematical model

T X


 X Battery max
X X X X X
min τl Cij nij + α ri,c,d,o,t + τe Cba Yba Dba Sba
r a∈Ωa

 ij∈ΩLC c∈ΩC d∈ΩD o∈ΩOP t=1 i∈Ω

l b
Solution 
methodology T X  

dis dis ch ch
X X X X
proposal + λba Pba,c,d,o,t + λba Pba,c,d,o,t (1)
OP t=1 a∈Ωa

C
c∈Ω D d∈Ω o∈Ω

Mathematical b
model Subject to:
Gen Wind Solar
X X X
Test systems Sfc,d,o,t + Pk,c,d,o,t + Pw ,c,d,o,t + Ps,c,d,o,t + rc,d,o,t
k∈ΩG w ∈ΩW s∈ΩS
b b b
dis ch
X
+ (Pba,c,d,o,t − Pba,c,d,o,t ) = db,c,d,o,t , ∀b, c, d, o, t = 1, 2, · · · , T (2)
ba∈Ωba
b
0
fij,c,d,o,t − γij (nij + nij )(θi,c,d,o,t − θj,c,d,o,t ) = 0, ∀ij ∈ Ωl , ∀c, d, o, t = 1, 2, · · · , T (3)
tn
min 0 ch ch dis dis max
X
Sba ≤ Sba + (Pba,c,d,o,t ηba − Pba,c,d,o,t /ηba )∆t ≤ Sba , ∀ba, c, d, o, tn = 1, 2, · · · , T (4)
t=1
T
ch ch dis dis
X
(Pba,c,d,o,t ηba − Pba,c,d,o,t /ηba )∆t = 0, ∀ba, c, d, o (5)
t=1
0 max
|fij,c,d,o,t | ≤ (nij + nij )fij , ∀ij ∈ Ωl , ∀c, d, o, t = 1, 2, · · · , T (6)
dis,min dis dis,max
Yba Pba ≤ Pba,c,d,o,t ≤ Yba Pba , ∀ba, c, d, o, t = 1, 2, · · · , T (7)
ch,min ch ch,max
Yba Pba ≤ Pba,c,d,o,t ≤ Yba Pba , ∀ba, c, d, o, t = 1, 2, · · · , T (8)
8/ 14
 Mathematical model

Solution
methodology
proposal
0 ≤ rc,d,o,t ≤ dc,d,o,t , ∀c, d, o, t = 1, 2, · · · , T (9)
Mathematical Gen Gen,max
model 0 ≤ Pi,c,d,o,t ≤ Pi , ∀i, c, d, o, t = 1, 2, · · · , T (10)
Wind f
Test systems 0 ≤ Pw ,c,d,o,t ≤ Pw , ∀w , c, d, o, t = 1, 2, · · · , T (11)
Solar f
0≤ Ps,c,d,o,t ≤ Ps , ∀s, c, d, o, t = 1, 2, · · · , T (12)
max
0≤ nij ≤ nij , ∀(i, j) ∈ Ωl (13)
max a
X
Yba ≤ Y ; ∀i ∈ Ωb (14)
b∈Ωa
b
a
Yba battery type {integer} ∀a ∈ Ωb (15)
nij integer, θj unbound (16)

9/ 14
 Outline

Solution
methodology
proposal

Mathematical 1 Solution methodology proposal

model

Test systems

2 Mathematical model

3 Test systems

10/ 14
 Garver modified system

100 400 300

Solution 5
1
methodology
proposal

Mathematical 400
model
3
Test systems 100
360

250
4
6
360 240

11/ 14
 Practical case study of the Brazilian system

Solution This system is based on the Brazilian system data in 2037 of the Empresa de
methodology
proposal Pesquisa Energética (EPE) that interconnects 8 states such as Parana, São Paulo,
Mathematical Minas Gerais, Goiás Bahia, Piauı́, Paraiba, Rio Grande do Norte and Ceará,
model

Test systems
consisting 11 thermal units, 21 hydro units, 13 wind farms, 2 nuclear units, 17
solar units, 190 transmission lines, and 108 buses. The 78.09 GW loads and 78.09
GW generation units on the Brazilian system are included.

12/ 14
 Brazilian system
CEARÁ

SERRA MEL 1
MARANHÃO 104 JOÃO CAMARA 3
SERRA MEL 2 106
105 M. VERDE
107
AÇU 3
JERUSALEMRIO GRANDE
Solution 103
108 DO NORTE

methodology BRAZIL PIAUÍ MILAGRE 2

SANTA LUZIA 2
101
SERRA S.
102 PARAIBA
proposal QUEIMADA
CURRAL N. P. 2
99
100

NOVA 2 96 PERNAMBUCO
LAGOA . V
OITIS 98

Mathematical 97

ALAGOAS
model ATLANTIC
OCEAN
OUROLANDIA 2
TOCANTINS BURITIRAMA 83 SERGIPE
95
GENTIO O. 2
Test systems 94

SOL DO S. BAHIA
93
SAPEAÇU
CAMAÇARI 4
85 87
IBICOARA CAMAÇARI 2
BOM JESUS L. 2 JUSSIAPE 86
84
CORRENTINA 89
82
91
IGAPORÃ 3
R. EGUA 88 POÇÕES 3
92 67
MATO GROSSO
Wind

Solar

LUZIÃNA Biomass
38 AURORA 2
40
39 C. ARINOS JAIBA
ARINOS 2 41
Fossil
42
90 SÃO J. DO
SILVÃNIA SKY A. 72 CV. AL PARAISO
81
73 SOLIDÃO
36 74 BRXJAN
JANAUBA 3 75 COL. JAN.
Hydro
GOIÁS PARACATU 71 76 IRAPUR
77
37 JANAUBA 6 78 CINFJA MADEIROS
70 C.JAVLT
79 SDALM. NETO
PIRAPORA 80 P. PARAISO 2 68 Nuclear
43 D BERN. 66
BURITIZEIRO
44
440 kv
EMBORCAÇÃO MINAS GERAIS CAPELINHA 3 500 kv
24 69
35 ESPIRITU 525 kv
ITUMBIARA
G. VALADARES SANTO 765 kv
30 P. JUSCELINO 65
23 NOVA PONTE 51 J. NEIVA 2
55
SÃO SIMÃO 25
S. GOTARDO 2
NOVA PONTE 3 34
MESQUITA
19 MARIMBONDO 2 ITABIRA 5 53 MUTUM
17 16 31 52
20
JAGUARA BOM 54 VIANA
AGUA V. 49 58
MARIMBONDO DESPACHO 3 50
VESPASIANO 2
MATO GROSSO 21
32 33
ESTREITO NEVES 1 57
DO SUL 22
ILHA SOLTEIRA OURO PRETO 2
45 47 RIO N.S
MORRO A. S. G. PARÁ
27 26
46
RIBEIRÃO P. ITABIRITU
LEOPOLDINHA CAMPO 2 60
SÃO PAULO 14ARARAQUARA POÇOS S.DUMONT48 64 56

15
28
CALDAS RIO DE LAGOS P. AÇU
ARARAQUARA 2 JANEIRO 59
29
TERMINAL
13 ITAJUBÁ 3 62 ANGRA DOS 61 RIO
ASSIS CACHOEIRA P. 63 REIS

12 18
SARANDI CAMPINAS
PARAGUAY 10
11 LONDRINA
8
GUAÍRA
6 ATLANTIC
ITAIPU 5IVAIPORÃ OCEAN
1 CASCAVEL O.
2 7
9
PARANA
3 4
FOZ
IGUAÇU

13/ 14
Solution
methodology
proposal

Mathematical
model

Test systems

Thank you!

14/ 14