Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Group 4 - BE
Group 4 - BE
- By Group 4
Ankit, the rockstar programmer at Netflix, glided through complex algorithms like a
magician. His code was a thing of beauty, consistently hitting deadlines and blowing
expectations out of the water. Nights and weekends weren't work- they were a badge of
honour, a way to prove his devotion to the projects he lovingly built. His colleagues
loved his team spirit, and his boss praised his coding magic. A quiet confidence
bloomed within him. This year, during reviews, maybe, just maybe, his dedication
would be rewarded with that promotion, the next step up the ladder.
One crisp morning, Ankit sat on pins and needles waiting for his review. He'd polished
his self-assessment- he was ready. But as he settled in across from David, his
manager, a knot of unease tightened in his gut. David flipped through the papers, his
usual spark replaced by a weird tension. He mentioned Ankit's achievements, but in a
flat tone that lacked its usual appreciation. Then, to Ankit's complete shock, David
nitpicked minor stuff, things that seemed insignificant compared to his overall
excellence. The promotion Ankit had silently craved went to Ravi, a good coder, sure,
but his work wasn't even close to Ankit's. He couldn't help but wonder if Ravi's personal
connection with David, their constant weekend golf meets, had somehow tipped the
scales.
"It is not good for a judge to take sides, but some will sin for only a piece of bread"
(Proverbs 28:21 NCV).
This proverb resonates in the modern workplace, where fairness and impartiality are
supposed to be the cornerstones of advancement for talented and dedicated
employees. Unfortunately, favouritism, the act of showing preference to certain
individuals, can emerge as a significant hurdle, creating a culture akin to a biased judge
swayed by personal gain. Despite the pervasive ideals of meritocracy, favouritism
undermines these principles, casting a shadow over organizational integrity and
employee morale.
The Problem:
At its core, favouritism in the workplace represents a departure from the merit-based
systems. It is the preferential treatment of certain individuals over others, often based
on personal connections or subjective preferences rather than objective qualifications.
This preferential treatment can take various forms, from unjustified promotions and
plum assignments to leniency in disciplinary actions or access to resources.
The ramifications of favouritism extend far beyond mere perception. When employees
perceive that success hinges on factors beyond their control, such as personal
relationships, it undermines their motivation and erodes trust in leadership.
Consequently, productivity suffers as disengagement sets in, and talented individuals
like Ankit may leave the company, disillusioned by the lack of meritocracy.
Potential Reasons:
• Analytical Factors: Human beings are prone to biases, and managers are no
exception. Unconscious biases may lead them to favour individuals who
resemble them in terms of personality, background, or values, perpetuating a
cycle of homogeneity within the organization.
• Subconscious Influences: Decision-making processes are often influenced by
factors beyond conscious awareness. Personal preferences, social
connections, or even subtle cues can sway judgments, leading to biased
decisions in the favour of certain individuals.
• Informal Culture: Organizational culture plays a pivotal role in shaping
behaviour and norms. In environments where networking and personal
relationships are prized above all else, favouritism may thrive, as individuals vie
for favour through their social capital network rather than merit.
• Leadership Traits: The behaviour and values exhibited by organizational leaders
set the tone for the entire workforce. Leaders prioritizing personal connections
over competence or engaging in nepotistic practices inadvertently promote
favouritism, fostering a culture of entitlement and resentment among
employees.
• Regulatory Issues: Despite the existence of policies and procedures designed
to promote fairness and equality, loopholes in the system may render them
ineffective. In the absence of robust oversight, favouritism may flourish, eroding
trust in institutional mechanisms for redressal.
Practical Solutions:
Conclusion:
References:
[1] https://www.springworks.in/blog/avoid-favoritism-in-the-workplace/
[2] https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/favoritism-in-the-workplace/
[3] https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/favoritism-in-the-
workplace
[4] https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesbusinesscouncil/2023/10/04/how-favoritism-
impacts-employees-and-how-leaders-can-fix-it/
[5] https://medium.com/@officeblues1/10-practical-strategies-to-help-navigate-
favouritism-in-the-workplace-43c0f06a264d
[6] https://www.adobe.com/content/dam/cc/en/diversity/pdfs/adobe_diversity-and-
inclusion_year-in-review_fy2021.pdf
[7] https://www.strategyand.pwc.com/gx/en/careers/career-path-at-strategyand.html