Professional Documents
Culture Documents
14
What good is it, my brothers, if someone says he has faith but does not have works?
Can that faith save him? 15 If a brother or sister has nothing to wear and has no food for
the day, 16 and one of you says to them, “Go in peace, keep warm, and eat well,” but
you do not give them the necessities of the body, what good is it? 17 So also faith of
itself, if it does not have works, is dead.” (James 2:14-26)
I. CAPSTONE PROJECT
In this activity, you will take the role of a Commission on Human Rights officer
which “commits to deliver prompt, responsive, accessible, and excellent public
service for the protection and promotion of human rights following the universal
human rights principles and standards.” You are tasked to critically engage and
evaluate how the dignity of the human person is promoted, implemented, and even
compromised within a selected community or institution through a report paper that will
be presented back to the community of interest, where the interview took place.
II. Catholic Social Teachings: Protecting the Dignity of the Human Person
Personal Development: Relationships in context with Adolescent Development
OUTPUT.
1.) This is a group activity, utilizing the section’s Research class group.
2.) Each group will assign members with the following role:
4.) The group’s task is to have a genuine dialogue/conversation (at least 15 minutes)
with each party about one’s roles and responsibilities in the sector:
a. From the side of the authority, the conversation is at least to know the nature,
background, purpose, and goal of the community or institution. Part of the
conversation is unveiling the importance of the people within the
community/institution who are assured of their dignity and meaningful
responsibilities.
b. On the other party, it shall be observed and unpacked in the conversation
how one’s role and responsibilities, as part of the community, are being
practiced; and that their dignity is assured of promotion, protection, and
implementation.
c. How does the awareness of these roles, relationships, conflicts, and
resolutions, enrich your own journey in becoming a responsible Filipino
adolescent in the 21st century?
5.) Real-life experiences and stories will be known in this activity. The CHR
should neither investigate, instigate, nor insinuate any malicious content and
injustices happening within the community/institution. The group will only
engage and listen to the practices from the stories of the people in the
community. Proper disposition, discerned questions, and group participation
are imperative before and during the actual conversation.
6.) Therefore, from this activity, only a genuine conversation and listening heart shall
occur from the group to produce an output which will be a report paper (please see
the format in a separate file attached).
What is a Call to Action? A Call to Action is a brief prompt creatively designed to inspire the readers to
perform a specific task/behavior and raise awareness with respect to the contents of the paper.
What is a Slogan? A slogan is a memorable motto, phrase, or expression of an idea or purpose, with the goal
of persuading members of the public to raise awareness or act on a specific cause or purpose.
8.) In the last part of the report paper, the group will be able to create constructive
criticism based on the interview and suggest a better relationship within the
community.
9.) In the same manner, the paper should also exhibit a thorough reflection on faith as
understood in CST and Personal Development, and the dignity of the human person
(freedom, justice, and love) vis-a-vis the situation of man in contemporary times.
10.) The students will be given at least four Catholic Social Teachings sessions and
two Personal Development sessions to finish the task. They are also expected to
give ample time for the conversation to occur.
3.) Deadline:
Submit in a Document file via the Assignments tab of MS Teams.
4.) Citations (only if necessary):
Properly cite your sources following the APA 7th Edition format.
Include a separate list of references, if necessary.
IV. Rubric:
Intervention
Competencies Advanced Proficient Developing Required
The output has a STRONG The output has a The output has a LIMITED The output was not able
knowledge of the SUFFICIENT knowledge of understanding of the show evidence of
background, goals, and the community by presenting competency by presenting only conversations within the
purposes including the the nature, background, roles the nature, background, roles people of a community.
Show awareness of roles and responsibilities, and responsibilities of the and responsibilities of the
the current social and the nature of the people within the community people within the community.
realities through chosen community or and the institution itself. The But the output was not able to
engaging in institution. This also students were able to provide show strong evidence of
authentic community includes a (verbatim) evidence of their conversation genuine conversation and
of different walks of genuine conversation from by presenting stories and stories as reflected in their
life and by the people who conversation in their paper. output.
participated in the
conversation showing
FORMIDABLE evidence in
the paper.
The output provided a The output provided The output provided The output was not able
STRONG analysis of the a PROFICIENT analysis of a LIMITED analysis of the to provide an analysis in
context within the the context within the context within the community the lenses of CST:
Analyze the context community through the community through the lenses through the lenses of Catholic Dignity of the Human
of the community lenses of Catholic Social of Catholic Social Teachings: Social Teachings: Dignity of Person.
through the CST Teaching: Dignity of the Dignity of the Person, the Person but was not able
concept of Dignity of Human Person: integrating integrating the learned to provide any materials
the Human Person comprehensively the concepts with their showing evidence of the
discussion on freedom, materials/proof to see the situation in the community.
relationship, and situation of the human person
wholeness of man. The in the community.
output shows STRONG
materials showing the
situation of the human
person in the community.
The output provides a The output provides a The output provides a The output was not able
STRONG evaluation on PROFICIENT evaluation on LIMITED evaluation on the to provide a constructive
the context of the the context of the community context of the community by criticism on the context of
community by providing by providing constructive providing a constructive the community.
Evaluate the context
constructive criticism and criticism and suggestions in criticism within the community
through the concept
comprehensive steps or solidarity with people towards but was not able to give
of Solidarity
suggestions in solidarity a meaningful community. suggestions toward a better
with the people toward a community.
better and meaningful
community.
The output provided a The output provided a The output provided a The output needed help
STRONG understanding of SUFFICIENT understanding LIMITED understanding of the to create a reflection
the competency by of the competency by creating competency by creating a about the situation of
creating an insightful a genuine reflection about poor reflection regarding man in contemporary
reflection about dignity, man's situation in man's situation in times.
Create a genuine and solidarity in connection contemporary times on faith, contemporary times.
reflection in the to the societal and general dignity, and solidarity.
lenses of faith situation of man in
contemporary times. The
insights were able to
transcend towards human
relationship, faith, and
God.
The student was able to The student was able to The student was able to The student was not able
provide STRONG evidence provide SUFFICIENT provide LIMITED evidence of to show any participation
of the competency by fully evidence of the competency the competency by in the group’s task.
participating in the group’s by participating in the group’s participating in the group’s
task showing concern and task showing concern and task but needs to improve on
Apply the values of lending help for the good of lending help for the good of their role and responsibility as
an Ateneo Hearter the output and activity. The the output and activity. assigned.
through genuine student was able to take
participation part by taking up their role
in the group with
authenticity.
The output demonstrates The output demonstrates The output demonstrates The output demonstrates
STRONG evidence of SUFFICIENT evidence of LIMITED evidence of mastery LACK of mastery and
mastery and understanding mastery and understanding of and understanding of effecting understanding as
of effective writing skills by effective writing skills by writing skills displayed in the evidenced by the several
Utilize proper writing being able to write the being able to write with number of (5-7) lapses in lapses (8 or more) in
conventions in the paper with very minimal (1- minimal lapses (3-4) in grammar, usage, and writing grammar, usage, and
delivery of the 2) or no lapses in grammar usage and writing mechanics; however, it still mechanics that affected
information through grammar, usage, and other mechanics including the intended message. the message conveyed.
a written output writing mechanics which referencing.
includes proper
referencing.
Personal Development
Intervention
Competencies Advanced Proficient Developing
Required
The students are able to The student is able to The student is able to clearly The student is able to vaguely The student is not able to
explain in complete detail incorporate in complete discuss ( ) with an interesting
1
discuss ( ) with a vague call to
1
discuss ( ) with an
1
The students are able to The student is able to The student is able to clearly The student is able to vaguely The student is not able to
appraise ( )one’s present
2
discuss in complete and discuss ( ) with an interesting
2
discuss ( ) with a vague call to
2
discuss ( ) with an
2
The student is able to The student is able to The student is able to clearly The student is able to vaguely The student is not able to
discuss ( )an understanding
3
discuss in complete and discuss ( ) with an interesting
3
discuss ( ) with a vague call to
3
discuss ( ) with an
3
of teen-age relationships,
clear detail ( ) with an
3
call to action in their paper’s action in their paper’s title. unrelated call to action.
including the acceptable
and unacceptable interesting and compelling title.
expressions of emotions. call to action in their
paper’s title.
The student is able to The student is able to The student is able to clearly The student is able to vaguely The student is not able to
demonstrate ( ) an
4
discuss in complete and discuss ( ) with an interesting
4
discuss ( ) with a vague call to
4
discuss ( ) with an
4
understanding of the
clear detail ( ) with an
4
call to action in their paper’s action in their paper’s title. unrelated call to action.
dynamics of collaborative
relationships and their role in interesting and compelling title.
building a cohesive and call to action in their
thriving community. paper’s title.
V. Peer Evaluation
GRADE
MEMBERS & ROLES
RELATIONSHIP WITH
PLANNING EXECUTION
MEMBERS OF GROUP
Jose Rizal A A D
Roles
D IR IR
Juan Tamad
Roles
Maria Makiling P A A
Roles
Ligaya Cruz A A IR
Roles
A - given when a student exhibits exemplary behavior, going above what is required.
P - given when a student meets the standards and is performing what is expected of everyone.
D - given when a student performs below the standard and does not participate as agreed.
IR - student did not participate at all or contributed unrelated information.
1. What notable acts of Magis did your group mates perform that contributed to the
success of your task?
________________________________________________________________
2. What would you do differently to improve the quality of your group’s work?
________________________________________________________________
VI. References
https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal3
Pilario, Daniel Franklin E., “Faith in Action: Catholic Social Teachings on the
Grounds”. St. Vincent School of Theology, Adamson University. 2017.
Prepared by:
Bro. Sidnycol R. Comendador
CST Teacher