Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Legal Opinion On Consensual Sex
Legal Opinion On Consensual Sex
Intern at ubAdvocate
Email - gkhushboo646@gmail.com
Contact no - 9997009528
Legal opinion
Consensual sex not rape
In the case of ram Bahadur v use who was a girl of majority and was of sound mind
will not constitute an offence of rape and Ram Bahadur can seek remedy under section 482
of Criminal procedure code by which the FIR of the complainant can be quashed by the
order of the high court.
According to the facts of the case Ram Bahadur is a college student who is preparing
for cili service exam and Usha who is a medical student fallen in love with each other.
Both being adult and despite the knowing the repercussion of their conduct entered
into a physical relation and established such relation several time during the tenure of 1 year.
There was no resistance on the part of girl to such relation nor the girl ever complaint about
such act to any one.
Ram after qualifying the entrance exam refused to marry Usha on the pretext that she is
from low caste and his parents are not ready.
In such a state of affair Usha cannot le a case of rape against Ram as the relation was
not made on the false promise of marriage and they both being an adult had entered into
such relation nor Usha asked Ram before establishing a relation that he will marry her or not.
Sexual relation between two consenting adult is not rape.
By taking into consideration the ruling which has been laid down in the case of Pramod
Suaryabhan Pawar v. State of Maharashtra
The supreme court have held that the high court failed in this case to distinguish
between consensual sex and rape.
The breach of promise can not be termed as false promise of marriage. There are two
conditions which are necessary to be ful lled for false promise of marriage which are as follow
1) the promise must be made with bad faith