The document describes two scavenge port designs for an engine that were simulated: Design 1 with 7 ports and Design 2 with 12 ports. It lists the parameters that were varied between simulations, such as the bore/stroke ratio, scavenge port width and spacing, and axis inclination angle. The simulations measured scavenging parameters, in-cylinder flow motions, and charging efficiency. The first set of graphs showed a bore/stroke ratio of 0.8 was optimal. Subsequent graphs demonstrated axis inclination angles of 90 degrees and a swirl orientation angle of 20 degrees also produced maximum charging efficiency.
The document describes two scavenge port designs for an engine that were simulated: Design 1 with 7 ports and Design 2 with 12 ports. It lists the parameters that were varied between simulations, such as the bore/stroke ratio, scavenge port width and spacing, and axis inclination angle. The simulations measured scavenging parameters, in-cylinder flow motions, and charging efficiency. The first set of graphs showed a bore/stroke ratio of 0.8 was optimal. Subsequent graphs demonstrated axis inclination angles of 90 degrees and a swirl orientation angle of 20 degrees also produced maximum charging efficiency.
The document describes two scavenge port designs for an engine that were simulated: Design 1 with 7 ports and Design 2 with 12 ports. It lists the parameters that were varied between simulations, such as the bore/stroke ratio, scavenge port width and spacing, and axis inclination angle. The simulations measured scavenging parameters, in-cylinder flow motions, and charging efficiency. The first set of graphs showed a bore/stroke ratio of 0.8 was optimal. Subsequent graphs demonstrated axis inclination angles of 90 degrees and a swirl orientation angle of 20 degrees also produced maximum charging efficiency.
No. of scavenge ports, amongst other parametres, can be varied to see which gives the best results.
PARAMETERS FOR THE FIRST SET OF RESULTS
B/S ratio ranging from 0.66 – 1.3 2 groups of scavenging ports The width of each scavenge port was kept constant for all B/S ratio designs The interval between adjacent scavenge ports in each group was fixed at 10 degrees The axis inclination angle (AIA )and swirl orientation angle (SOA) of the scavenge ports were fixed at 90 and 20 degrees An initial AIA and SAO will be selected arbitrarily as we don’t know the optimal values yet
PARAMETRES MEASURED IN SIMULATIONS
4 Scavenging parameters DR delivery ratio TE – trapping efficiency SE – Scavenging efficiency CE – charging efficiency
Quantify In-cylinder flow motion
SR – Swirl Ratio TR – Tumble Ratio CTR – Cross tumble ration
1ST SET OF GRAPHS
Varying the Bore stroke ratio - Optimal – 0.8
2ND SET OF GRAPHS
Varying the axis of inclination (AIA) – between 60 and 90 degrees - AIA of 90 was selected as the optimal value
3rd SET OF GRAPHS
varying the swirl orientation angle (SOA) - SOA varied from 0 -31.5 degrees. - Maximum CE was achieved with a SOA of 20