INTRODUCTION TO CREATIVE RESEARCH

Name of Researcher: ____________________ Grade & Section: _______ Date of Review: ______
Thesis Title:____________________________________________________________________

INSTRUCTIONS. This form shall be accomplished by the researcher’s adviser upon the review of the fourth
chapter. The ADVISER shall tick the box with the score corresponding to the quality of submission. The legend
for scoring is as follows: 10 – Outstanding; 8 - Good; 6 – Satisfactory; 4 – Needs Improvement; 4 –
Poor; 0 – No Submission/Manifestation.
CHAPTER 4: DISCUSSION OF RESULTS AND PRODUCTION

A. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 10 8 6 4 2 0

1. The chapter begins with a review of the study citing the research
approach and design, research objective, and research questions.
2. A review summarizing the methodology including the data sources, data
gathering procedures, and data analysis procedures is presented.
3. The researcher has enumerated the general themes of the study as well
as a slight preview of what these themes explore.
4. The researcher has generated appropriate themes and subthemes that
directly answer the research questions and help accomplish the study’s
objectives.
5. The discussion of themes is anchored on theories or studies presented in
the Chapter 2.
6. The researcher uses direct quotations from the interview/observation
transcript that support the theme.
7. Transcripts from interviews are conventionally correct, and translations
are faithful to the source language.
8. The formulation of this part is comprehensive, coherent, free from errors
in grammar, usage, mechanics, etc., and is not plagiarized.
Total /80
B. DISCUSSION OF THE PRODUCTION 10 8 6 4 2 0
1. The researcher-artist discusses in detail how the production came to be,
referencing the steps mentioned in the production procedural plan.
2. The researcher-artist recalls and enumerates the concepts, elements,
features, characteristics, principles, etc. of the art production that are
to be observed in the output.
3. A brief explanation or synopsis of the production outputs is presented.
Should the artist have more than one production, each one is explained.
4. The researcher-artist defines each concept, element, feature,
characteristic, principle, etc. incorporated in the work, citing reputable
and references to come up with these definitions.
5. The researcher-artist elaborates how the results of the research were
able to able to inspire, inform, or influence the production output.
6. The discussion of this part answers sufficiently the production question.
7. There is an accompanying production evaluation form or checklist to be
filled out at a later time by the evaluators.
8. The formulation of this part is comprehensive, coherent, free from
errors in grammar, usage, mechanics, etc., and is not plagiarized.
Total /80
Overall Total /160

Accomplished by:
_____________________________________
Name of Thesis Adviser & Signature