Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Example: Proponents draft a project concept document that outlines the need for a sanitary landfill to
address increasing waste generation in the region. The document describes the proposed facility's
design, operational procedures, and potential environmental benefits.
2. Site Identification:
Proponents identify potential candidate sites for the landfill or integrated facility. They gather relevant
information about these sites based on predefined Site Identification Criteria.
Example: Proponents conduct surveys and research to identify suitable locations for the landfill. They
assess factors such as proximity to population centers, geological stability, and accessibility to
transportation networks.
Example: Proponents send formal letters to the Regional Directors of EMB and MGB, requesting
assistance in assessing the environmental and hydro-geological suitability of the identified sites. Copies
of these letters are also provided to the Regional Executive Director of the Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (DENR).
Example: Proponents collaborate with a university's environmental science department to conduct soil
and water quality tests at the candidate sites. The results of these tests help assess potential
environmental impacts of the proposed facility.
Example: Using GIS software, proponents overlay thematic maps depicting sensitive environmental
areas with the candidate site locations to identify any conflicts with Exclusion Criteria, such as proximity
to protected habitats or water sources.
JUDGEMENT: If YES, proceed to Second Tier. If NO, go back to the step 2: Site Identification
5. Second-Tier Evaluation: Conditional Criteria
Pre-screened sites that pass the Exclusion Criteria are subjected to second-tier evaluation against
Conditional Criteria. Reports are prepared by EMB and MGB, recommending mitigating measures or
further studies if necessary.
Example: EMB and MGB assess the remaining candidate sites based on Conditional Criteria such as land
use compatibility and potential environmental impacts. They provide recommendations on measures to
mitigate any identified risks.
JUDGEMET 6. Acceptable Site Selection: IF YES PROCEED TO SITE ACQUISITION (LAST STEP), IF NO, GO
BACK TO STEP 2 OR CONSIDER ALTERNATIVES
At least one site is found to be acceptable based on the Conditional Criteria ranking, and proponents
commit to complying with any associated conditions.
Example: After thorough evaluation, a candidate site is identified that meets all Conditional Criteria
without significant environmental or social risks. Proponents agree to adhere to the recommended
mitigation measures and conditions.
6. Consideration of Alternatives: IF NO
Proponents explore alternatives such as clustering with neighboring local government units (LGUs) or
other solid waste management (SWM) options before finalizing site selection.
Example: Proponents assess the feasibility of collaborating with nearby LGUs to establish a regional
waste management facility instead of a standalone landfill. This alternative is considered to maximize
efficiency and resource utilization.
Example: Proponents initiate negotiations with landowners for the acquisition of the selected site, while
simultaneously developing detailed plans for landfill construction and operation. They also begin the
process of obtaining environmental clearances and permits required for the project's implementation.